3M 2091 vs 3M 2091CN Purchased on Amazon

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2020
  • 3M 2091 vs 3M 2091CN Purchased on Amazon
    This video demonstrates some testing that we performed using the 3M 6800 Full Face Mask Respirator. We are comparing the 3M 2091 and 3M 2091CN P100 filters. The mask is tested using a custom setup. We took a mannequin head and drilled three holes and placed plastic tubes through the head to measure air from different areas. One tube goes to the forehead. One hole goes to the mouth. One hole goes to the nose. The forehead and nose holes are used to sample air in different compartments. With this mask we only used the nose sampling tube. This air goes to a four part manifold which allows the air to be measured by the PCE particle counter. The mouth hole is connected to a tube which will allow us to eventually simulate breathing. We are still working on this part of the set up. The four sections manifold allows sampling of the ambient air and also to flush the manifold with filtered air using a ventilator filter for filtration. The PCE particle counter measures particles as small as 0.3 microns. A micron is 1/1000 of a millimeter.
    The one downside to this mask is that the exhalation port is not filtered. If you are an asymptomatic carrier of COVID-19 you can spread the virus with this mask. There is also no voice diaphragm which makes talking somewhat difficult. The mask itself is quite comfortable and the seal is made of nice soft rubber like material.
    Based on the measurements we made, this mask should work against COVID-19. Nonetheless, this mask was not designed for biologic particles and caution should be used when using this device for this purpose. Both filters worked well at 99.96% (2091) and 99.96% (2091CN) filtration.
    One warning I wrote to 3M and they recommended against buying any filter that is branded or intended for foreign markets because they will not be able to authenticate the filter. They also only recommended buying directly from authorized distributors in US.
    I quote: "3M recommends that customers in the United States avoid and refrain from purchasing 3M personal protective equipment from sources outside the United States, particularly from sources advertising on online marketplace platforms. We recommend purchasing through your normal 3M Authorized Distributor in the US."
    They do have an email for COVID-19 fraud: covidfraud@mmm.com.
    This is the 3M website for COVID fraud.
    www.3m.com/3M/en_US/worker-he...
    This is the link to the mask at 3M official website.
    www.3m.com/3M/en_US/company-u...
    This is the website for PCE.
    www.pce-instruments.com/us/
    We use this particle counter from PCE for the testing device.
    www.pce-instruments.com/us/me...
    These are some videos from the company.
    / @pceinstrumentsuspceam...
    This is another mask we tested from Honeywell.
    • 5400 Honeywell Full Fa...
    This is the amazon link to the 3M 2091CN filter.
    www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08...
    This is the amazon link to the 3M 2091 filter.
    www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07...

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @diesdas2172
    @diesdas2172 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Holy shit thank you so much. This was exactly what I needed to know. Sometimes I love the internet and random strangers doing gods work.

    • @RobertoMikiMD
      @RobertoMikiMD  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are welcome. I am happy you found it helpful!

  • @mnkrck
    @mnkrck 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You don't know how much I appreciate this test 👍

    • @RobertoMikiMD
      @RobertoMikiMD  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      glad you found it helpful!

    • @RobertoMikiMD
      @RobertoMikiMD  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thank you for watching!

  • @charlesware5767
    @charlesware5767 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for this video. It answered my question that only performance testing could answer.

    • @RobertoMikiMD
      @RobertoMikiMD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You r welcome. Power in knowledge.

  • @0439nerd
    @0439nerd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this video!

  • @justaskdad
    @justaskdad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the info

  • @dr.j6747
    @dr.j6747 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow, thank you for testing these 3M filters. So there are only minor filtration differences between the 3M P100 "7093s versus these 2091s". Any other advantages or disadvantages between the 7093s vs. 2091s?

    • @RobertoMikiMD
      @RobertoMikiMD  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      7093 has the advantage of being splash proof. With the disc shaped filters if you are working with water or oils it can damage the filters. So for those situations the 7093 is better.

    • @dr.j6747
      @dr.j6747 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@RobertoMikiMD Very good points, I appreciate your expertise. I look forward to learning more from you.

  • @sharmajs2010
    @sharmajs2010 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello Roberto, all your testing videos are really great. It really helps to take a decision to buy the same. Can you please also try and test 3m 2097 and 3m aura mask. Thanks so much, Sanjay

    • @RobertoMikiMD
      @RobertoMikiMD  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      will try to get my hands on some

    • @sharmajs2010
      @sharmajs2010 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RobertoMikiMD Thanks Roberto, it would also help if we can test face shield + mask and see if we get 100% filtration efficiency by using both. Can you also let me know what is the smallest particle size which can be counted by the machine in nm/microns, Thanks and Regards, Sanjay

    • @RobertoMikiMD
      @RobertoMikiMD  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sharmajs2010 0.3 microns is smallest measurable on my machine