Are Monsanto Pesticides Poisoning Children?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ส.ค. 2022
  • Six corporations control the pesticide market: Syngenta, Bayer, Monsanto, Dow, Basf et Dupont. But is our dependence on pesticides harming the health of our children? Every day, children are exposed to up to 130 chemical pollutants from pesticides. All around the world, scientists and doctors are raising the alarm, linking an increase in child cancers, birth defects and even the explosion of autism with exposure to chemicals in pesticides.
    In France, children breathe a pesticide classified as “probable carcinogenic”. Distributed all over the world, it’s one of Bayer’s best-sellers. Martin Boudot and his team of reporters took some samples of dozens of hair of children and went to the annual shareholder's meeting of Bayer in Germany to confront the corporations with its own principles.
    In Hawaii, politics and citizens battle with the pesticides industry. This paradise on earth has become an open-air laboratory where corporations test their future plants and seeds. But it’s also experienced an explosion in birth defects on the island and residents voted against the massive use of pesticides in the fields close to schools and hospitals. So the pesticide industry sued them to enable the use of pesticides to continue
    Filmed in France, Germany, Hawaii, Belgium and USA, this documentary reveals how some chemical corporations endanger the health of our children.
    This documentary was first released in 2016.
    ---
    SUBSCRIBE for more amazing stories, including free FULL documentaries. At Java Films we have an incredible library of award-winning documentaries: from world-leading investigations to true crime and history, we have something for everyone!
    Click the SUBSCRIBE button and make sure to set NOTIFICATIONS to stay updated with all new content!
    Sign up to the Java Films Clubs for exclusive deals and discounts for amazing documentaries - find out first about FREE FULL docs: eepurl.com/hhNC69
    Head to www.watchjavafilms.tv/ to check out our catalogue of documentaries available on Demand.
    You can also find our docs on :
    Amazon Prime Video: www.amazon.com/v/javafilms
    Vimeo On Demand: vimeo.com/javafilms/vod_pages
    Like us on Facebook: / javafilms
    Follow us on Twitter: / java_films
    Follow us on Instagram: / javafilms.tv

ความคิดเห็น • 67

  • @bobsthea
    @bobsthea ปีที่แล้ว +19

    if these chemicals were or was banned in europe or US or developed countries, these companies can dump onto developing countries just to safeguard their huge investment, so these kind of things should be on global agreement for dangerous substances

    • @TheRusschannel
      @TheRusschannel 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      its too late, the stuff is everywhere and has destroyed our kids forever now :(

    • @garyssimo
      @garyssimo หลายเดือนก่อน

      Roundup stays in soil 20 years I heard.

  • @TheMPExperience
    @TheMPExperience ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you for creating this documentary. People need to know this!!!! 🙏🏿🙏🏿

    • @DukeGMOLOL
      @DukeGMOLOL ปีที่แล้ว

      People need to know the video is arm-waving nonsense.

  • @lavinder11
    @lavinder11 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    French researchers have. Been doing excellent work re: damages that pesticides perpetuate. They've been banning use of them even up to a month ago.

    • @DukeGMOLOL
      @DukeGMOLOL ปีที่แล้ว

      Glyphosate is safe and France does not ban it.

    • @lavinder11
      @lavinder11 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DukeGMOLOL It is banned and being phased out by 2035.

    • @DukeGMOLOL
      @DukeGMOLOL ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lavinder11 Not a single country in the EU bans glyphosate and you cannot provide a shard of evidence that it does.

  • @chustar2620
    @chustar2620 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    “We must protect the next childrens brains” - it’s a bit too late… don’t ya think 😵‍💫🙄

    • @rachelhansbro7802
      @rachelhansbro7802 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly I agree, too little too late to be sounding the alarm I reckon!!

  • @alicecoppers8980
    @alicecoppers8980 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Dr Stephanie Senoff from MIT did 35 yrs of research on glyphosate and Autism. Direct relationship

    • @DukeGMOLOL
      @DukeGMOLOL ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Seneff has not done a single bit of test with or on glyphosate. She has done no research on autism, all she has done is made spurious correlations.

    • @melissaverduin3693
      @melissaverduin3693 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Stephanie Seneff is a trustworthy scientist!She's very intelligent and fearless!

    • @thenewmds
      @thenewmds 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      OK Troll. @@DukeGMOLOL

    • @DukeGMOLOL
      @DukeGMOLOL 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@melissaverduin3693 The screwball Seneff is mocked all over the world.

    • @DukeGMOLOL
      @DukeGMOLOL 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thenewmds Mr. Mythbuster to you.

  • @aaronschuhhardt2096
    @aaronschuhhardt2096 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Now I know why I get a headache when I drink wine

    • @DukeGMOLOL
      @DukeGMOLOL ปีที่แล้ว

      Not because of that.

  • @organiccleanfoodconnection
    @organiccleanfoodconnection 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You can see on my channel the last five years my farm being destroyed by chemical spray drift. I was sick and stuck in my house for eight years. I had to have three other countries save my life. I have a new neighbor and in the last five years he has destroyed most of my trees, poisoned my dog and cat. Puts me in bed for three weeks when I get sprayed. Department of agriculture has got positive test results of the one of my house and the food. The farmer has threatened my life. But the county attorney says it’s not her problem. And the sheriff escort the sprayer to my farm now. This is complete insanity. Welcome to Kansas.

  • @joeker6220
    @joeker6220 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Listen to Dr Zach Bush about the side effects of glyphosate

    • @DukeGMOLOL
      @DukeGMOLOL ปีที่แล้ว

      Zach the Quack.

    • @garyssimo
      @garyssimo หลายเดือนก่อน

      Duke the troll

  • @rachelhansbro7802
    @rachelhansbro7802 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Little to no mention of UK, I take it we’re still using this🤭

    • @marycielo7790
      @marycielo7790 ปีที่แล้ว

      Those companies are contaminating our planet but the richest is better than the health of the people especially the childrens, but about that doesn't talk the followers of the climatic change.

    • @nyxnecrodragon4256
      @nyxnecrodragon4256 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's because it's french. We are still using these. Have you ever seen a weed killer called Roundup? That's one of the commercially available one.

  • @garyssimo
    @garyssimo หลายเดือนก่อน

    We have hope in the U. S. to end this poisioning in the form of a presidential candidate who cares ablut health more than dollars.
    He will have my vote!

  • @outpostoneohfive
    @outpostoneohfive 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ya part of zee final solution yaa

  • @jerrymarnon41
    @jerrymarnon41 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    COMMENTS BEING DELEATED.

    • @TheRusschannel
      @TheRusschannel 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this is Google so...

    • @garyssimo
      @garyssimo หลายเดือนก่อน

      Musk will be buying google soon

  • @whatifitstrue7059
    @whatifitstrue7059 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    corporations; business, straw men, artificial persons, legal codes/acts and statutes, masks
    corporations are an artificial persons(legal definition), a mask, with its own, codes, acts(actors) and statutes(status over others). ignorance(entrapment) is acceptance of a contract, codes/acts and statutes are voluntary(must have con-sent). any one can incorporate anything, even themselves. this then has a board of directors at the top(king and queen of england and others), followed by the CEO, other chief executives, vice presidents(federal political persons), directors, managers and lower-level(status) employees. corporation are a presumption(with presumptions attached), people(men, women and children) are its law, it evolved from. corporations are legally able to make its own codes, that must get honoured in its artificial corporate court. this is where judges are used, not a jury court, its law. corporations are legally able to use debt illusion (try to show a friend debt illusion? what color is it? what shape? how does it smell? its not real, a presumption, the lie). they evolved the birth certificate(a legal trust, stealing every child's free equal share of earths land and resources), signed by the corporate registrar general's status, then given to the people, its invitation to its artificial corporate society, as a citizen, an artificial person, em-ploy-ee/slave. the countries, cities, police departments, fire departments, healthcare departments, tax departments etc... are all incorporated, what owns the corporations and its employees? corporations only have jurisdictional authority with other corporations, never its law, the people, nature and god(government; god-over-men, corporations are atheists, not god). corporate banks could then legally use debt illusion(where slavery, pollution, suffering, wars and murders evolve from) with people using their birth certificate, acting as a corporation. this is how the rich/wealthy are legally trying too buy/own all land, water, nature and what people create in its corporate legal political atheist communist system, codes they must pay them tax/debt presumption for anything. in their corporate financial court, hatred and wars are legal, profitable, illegal to love and forgive, unprofitable. did any real life people volunteer in ignorance(entrapment) to corporate codes/acts and statutes? corporations are a civil/suicidal/atheistic/nihilism best not to agree, consent, volunteer to any corporate presumptions, lies. best to being free to share with others, knowing the law and god.
    imagine, think a body, mind and soul, is love, wise, and power, able to forgive and be free?
    avoid debt, the lie, be true and free.
    court; lawyers/judges or jury of people; men, woman, children and nature.
    the court was created by the people, for the people, with a jury of people. anyone thinking another owes the illusion of a debt, that automatically evolves into hatred/war, people can peacefully bring the case(real life proof) a jury will look at the evidence, proof, if it can cause them and their children criminal intent, cause damage and injury, they will vote against it. a judge(most are lawyers, that debate anything for money/debt. can be bought and paid for, too vote for the highest bidder, especially when they are employed by the financial corporate legal political system. there are many court cases that a jury would have never voted what the judges voted for. all departments/institution in the legal political system are a business, what business has proof it has authority to force anything too act as its slave? is it possible for people with a jury to state they do not need some business/services? be free of any corporate legal authority. lawyers are "legally" bound to their law society, its a conflict of interest, serving 2 masters, that's impossible. lawyers are a translator, they translate their financial debt illusion language they call legalese for a debt, trying to trap presumably others in it. only with a jury trail with real life proof can there be a fair trail. all corporate courts use only presumptions, they are a presumption. they presume judges are better then a jury of people coming together with a case of real life proof. too protect and remove criminal activity being done too their real live property, especially their children.
    imagine, think a body and spirit, is love, wise, and power, able to forgive and be free?
    avoid debt, the lie, be true and free.
    presumption of law
    imagine a parent, teacher, police, anyone, presume a child may do something they do not like, use the presumption too punish the child, accuse/charge the child, too take the child's allowance/fine it, ground/jail the child, then also confiscates the child's toys/property, for something that didn't happen, is not real, a lie. anyone using presumptions as something real should get help, put in a psychological hospital, to show what is true or a lie, real or unreal? what psychological effects would presumptions have on the child? it can use presumptions, something not real, a lie, to make others do what it wants? take what others really have? what they really created?
    did lawyers want more business? so since the corporation is a presumption of law. law; they thought its logical(its not) that they could legally attach presumptions too a presumption; the corporation; the birth certificate; the civilian. more presumptuous charges, the more court cases, criminals, fines, incarcerations(jail profits), confiscation of property, so many more profits.
    0 tolerance! for any presumptions, illegal to rebuttal(show they are not real, a lie) them.
    hitler and its s.s., stalin and its k.g.b. and others, used presumptions to charge, inprison and murder men, woman, children and destroy nature.
    let the courts use only real life proof, not a presumption, something not real, a lie.
    imagine, think a body and spirit, is love, wise, and power, able to forgive and be free?
    avoid debt, the lie, be true and free.

  • @horrormysterieswithmr.s7881
    @horrormysterieswithmr.s7881 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm a Corpse and i say poisoning is not good

  • @judyl.abrahams1518
    @judyl.abrahams1518 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do the child eat RAW FOOD 😮

  • @HELIX1
    @HELIX1 ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys need to un-interlace your videos, Topaz has good shit for that