Just came across this teacher's presentations in maths and physics. A great teacher. I wish I'd had such a teacher when I studied physics many years ago, back in the 1970s. His enthusiasm is inspiring!
Love this stuff! Great presentation. I've already taken my lumps and made it through electrical engineering and I am here 25 years later watching this and refreshing myself because it is awesome. Just like he said the symmetry between the electro-static force and gravitational force show that these two forces are probably a derivative of another more fundamental force that physics have yet to discover. To answer the question of why the electro-static or gravitational force exists is why I am here watching this.
Ha ha. I never gained good math in school. I jumped into carpentry at 16. First I learned a -- 90 = x then, I learned a triangle has 180° Then I learned a^+b^=C^ Now with time permitting, I have learned Sin, Cos & tan. When you are this far behind it doesn't matter. I'm just happy learning about the triangle.
I used to teach this stuff years ago but if I was to tutor again this series would make an excellent guide to the order in which the material could be presented. I might add that I share his infectious enthusiasm for the subject. Physics is just brilliant.
Truly An inspiration im trying to become and electrician and im learning everything about electrical / magnetic fields and ive watched so many of your videos im so motivated to do this because of you i love the positivity and enthusiasm in all of your videos it makes me more excited every time i learn something new from you. thank you so much these videos and so many people out there appreciate all the time and work you put into everything you do just know your changing lives and motivating people to be better and live there lives and chase all of there hopes and dreams keep being awesome :)
All fun in Physics will be on an inclined plane. Our teacher is very , very good.. We have more fun...and understand better... All aboard ! Thank you Sir . .a lot.
The permittivity "constant" is very much dependent on the medium in which the measurement of the force between the charged objects is measured. The value stated in the video is only applicable to the medium of air . A different value for this "constant" will have to be used if we were to measure the force in say water or in different medium. Permittivity is actually should be defined as a "coefficient" associated with the medium and not as a universal constant such as the Pi or the Euler constants which are totally and completely medium independent. Thank you for your dedication to science.
Edward's EZ Equilibrium Rotation Law "In a closed system, rotational equilibrium is achieved when the sum of torques acting on the system about any axis is zero. This principle applies universally across physical systems, maintaining balance and stability in rotational motion." This law states that in any closed system, the rotational equilibrium is maintained when the total torque (the rotational force) acting on the system around any chosen axis is balanced, ensuring steady rotational motion without acceleration or deceleration.
the particles each spin in opposite directions, positive or negative, like a screw form factor. screw form factors spinning in the same direction bounce off each other, but screw form factors of an opposite form factor will tend to screw onto each other.
For the quadratic formula at 54:07 you get two answers using the quadratic formula. how do you know to use 1.2x10^-5 instead of 3.8 x 10^-5 (the other answer)
You know what, I did. Got really discouraged. But thanks to your condescending response, I kept watching. Pretty interesting that it works that way. Hope your interpersonal skills get better.
@@jawshua9249 hey man i just found it weird that you asked a question that was answered within 1-2 minutes of your timestamp, wasnt trying to be condescending, but im HAPPY you figured it out :) its ok to get discouraged, its not ok to give up , cheers
The way the puzzle about the three charges (see 37:57) is solved impresses. It took 10 min manipulating cumbersome equiations, while just common sense tells that the values of the forces are irrelevant. Relevant only the equality of the forces. Therefore all these pi, epcilon, and Q are irrelevant. Relevant only relative distances. Therefore the puzzle is sorted out without equiations in just 3 seconds: if the distances are 1 to 3 then the charges should be 1 to 9. In physics ability to use common sense and logic is more important then mechanical manipulation with equiations
Your comment deserves an oval applause. Common sense you say. Define common sense. lol, from what perspective does your thinking come from? Common sense, whos common sense? The collective of what = common?
@@simpleman283 :::: Define common sense. lol, from what perspective does your thinking come from? Common sense, whos common sense? The collective of what = common? ========= doesn"t your common sense suggest you to google "common sense" ?
If opposites attract, how does the atom with negatively charged electrons in the cloud around the nucleus and the positively charged protons in the nucleus keep from collapsing in on itself?
Excellent question! And I really mean that. Around the year 1900 that was the #1 question physicist had on their mind. How could that be possible? After years of experiments and theoretical work, the answer to this question birthed something you might have heard of - Quantum Mechanics. Basically, the electron can't fall all the way in and collide with the nucleus because it would violate the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle. Its beyond the scope of this lesson and this video, but it is all because of the weird way quantum mechanics works.
@@MathAndScience Could it have something to do with the repulsion of the electron between themselves actually preventing them from falling into the nucleus?
It will fix problems like you have to design a smoke precipitator. It will help you to get how much distance should be maintained between the two plates.
One question to the Lecturer. From Coulomb's formula: if the sum of two charges is constant, the force between these two charges reaches its maximum when the charges are equal. Like area of a rectangle with a given perimeter reaches maximum when its sides are equal. How can this be explained from physics viewpoint without using formulae?
Oh my goodness! I am thoroughly confused and wondering if I have been taught wrong or is this just another way of expressing the same thing? Here's my delima: I was taught by Malveno back in the 70's. He said that the Electron was a solid particle and when it left an atom, it left a hole behind which was a positive charge. The neucalous remained as the name implies, neutral. Also, an ion is an atom which has an extra Electron which makes it heavier than the original atom. Also, a coulomb is 6.28 x 10¹⁸ electrons. I could be wrong on that, but it was either 6.24 or 6.28, I cannot remember which. The important thing is, was I taught correctly or in correctly? It really don't matter at this juncture, for I am a 73 year old tech fossel anyway. I just don't want to lead anyone astray.
N Tesla .... Positive ... Neutral .... Negative ... Rule of 3 ... This is how my brain works also .... In my theory all things are light and one .... Light and Dark .... Black light is a negative neutral ... Or AC the opposite Tesla math chart
Watching always again and again from Middle East Saudi Arabia KSA OFW PILIPINO MIGRANTS WORKING ABROAD INTERNATIONAL WORLD 🌍🌎 WIDE Globally OFW PROFESSIONAL JOBS 11.5+million professionals job Pilipinos Luzon Visayas Mindanao Sabah Philippines Maharlika.
I only did that to my dad ONCE. After I picked myself up from the floor, and apologized, I learned not to do that. Perhaps lessons such as that have been lost over the years....
Coulomb's Law---no---Henry Cavendish's Law as well as Om's, Watt's, Ferriday's, and others. None of these men "discovered" or invented any of these. it was all Henry Cavendish folks.
Albert Einstein, quantum entanglement, Einstein call it “( spooky action at a distance across space & time)”……..He also said “( two particles or secretly communicating across space & time)”😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Your brain works like a can of menudo. If you find out what is in menudo, you would not eat it, but if you need what it does for you, you'll want two cans of it.
Jason is the best teacher I have ever seen.
Just came across this teacher's presentations in maths and physics. A great teacher. I wish I'd had such a teacher when I studied physics many years ago, back in the 1970s. His enthusiasm is inspiring!
Jason, the god of the sciences, what a great Teacher!
Amazing! Thank you so much. You made learning physics so much fun and i learned more from you in this hour than I have in class for two months
Love this stuff! Great presentation. I've already taken my lumps and made it through electrical engineering and I am here 25 years later watching this and refreshing myself because it is awesome. Just like he said the symmetry between the electro-static force and gravitational force show that these two forces are probably a derivative of another more fundamental force that physics have yet to discover. To answer the question of why the electro-static or gravitational force exists is why I am here watching this.
Ha ha.
I never gained good math in school.
I jumped into carpentry at 16. First I learned a -- 90 = x
then, I learned a triangle has 180°
Then I learned a^+b^=C^
Now with time permitting, I have learned Sin, Cos & tan.
When you are this far behind it doesn't matter.
I'm just happy learning about the triangle.
It is so helpful that you do not missout any steps ( though cumbersome) , and then explain the meaning. Thank you.
I wish every professor was like you, sir.
I used to teach this stuff years ago but if I was to tutor again this series would make an excellent guide to the order in which the material could be presented. I might add that I share his infectious enthusiasm for the subject. Physics is just brilliant.
The first lesson in physics for me was when I was using a hammer to drive a nail, but hit my thumb. I had a Tom Thumb! :(
Jason you are the best teacher I ever seen
Truly An inspiration im trying to become and electrician and im learning everything about electrical / magnetic fields and ive watched so many of your videos im so motivated to do this because of you i love the positivity and enthusiasm in all of your videos it makes me more excited every time i learn something new from you. thank you so much these videos and so many people out there appreciate all the time and work you put into everything you do just know your changing lives and motivating people to be better and live there lives and chase all of there hopes and dreams keep being awesome :)
All fun in Physics will be on an inclined plane.
Our teacher is very , very good.. We have more fun...and understand better... All aboard ! Thank you Sir . .a lot.
I just love your method of teaching...
Greetings from Nigeria....
Thank you! 😃
Thank you for doing this, you're a good teacher!
The permittivity "constant" is very much dependent on the medium in which the measurement of the force between the charged objects is measured. The value stated in the video is only applicable to the medium of air . A different value for this "constant" will have to be used if we were to measure the force in say water or in different medium. Permittivity is actually should be defined as a "coefficient" associated with the medium and not as a universal constant such as the Pi or the Euler constants which are totally and completely medium independent. Thank you for your dedication to science.
Excellent video! Thank you for shearing your knowledge.
My pleasure!
THANK YOU... SIR...!!!
Most welcome!
Edward's EZ Equilibrium Rotation Law
"In a closed system, rotational equilibrium is achieved when the sum of torques acting on the system about any axis is zero. This principle applies universally across physical systems, maintaining balance and stability in rotational motion."
This law states that in any closed system, the rotational equilibrium is maintained when the total torque (the rotational force) acting on the system around any chosen axis is balanced, ensuring steady rotational motion without acceleration or deceleration.
the particles each spin in opposite directions, positive or negative, like a screw form factor. screw form factors spinning in the same direction bounce off each other, but screw form factors of an opposite form factor will tend to screw onto each other.
He is the best , i ever seen, blessed up
Thank you so much. You made learning physics so much fun.
1:08:42 mins. Take the square root of both sides to equal (3) ^(1/2)= [(d+0.1)/d].
Thank you Dr Jason ❤
For the quadratic formula at 54:07 you get two answers using the quadratic formula. how do you know to use 1.2x10^-5 instead of 3.8 x 10^-5 (the other answer)
did you stop watching at that moment? he literally answers that question
You know what, I did. Got really discouraged. But thanks to your condescending response, I kept watching. Pretty interesting that it works that way. Hope your interpersonal skills get better.
I actually answered once he got the answer and I had not yet realized it was the other number from the quadratic
@@jawshua9249 hey man i just found it weird that you asked a question that was answered within 1-2 minutes of your timestamp, wasnt trying to be condescending, but im HAPPY you figured it out :) its ok to get discouraged, its not ok to give up ,
cheers
Fair enough. Thanks! Cheers!
1:04:00 In this example can I put a +1 micro coulomb charge 10cm away from -3 micro coulomb charge in the other direction?
The way the puzzle about the three charges (see 37:57) is solved impresses. It took 10 min manipulating cumbersome equiations, while just common sense tells that the values of the forces are irrelevant. Relevant only the equality of the forces. Therefore all these pi, epcilon, and Q are irrelevant. Relevant only relative distances. Therefore the puzzle is sorted out without equiations in just 3 seconds: if the distances are 1 to 3 then the charges should be 1 to 9. In physics ability to use common sense and logic is more important then mechanical manipulation with equiations
Your comment deserves an oval applause. Common sense you say. Define common sense. lol, from what perspective does your thinking come from? Common sense, whos common sense? The collective of what = common?
@@simpleman283 :::: Define common sense. lol, from what perspective does your thinking come from? Common sense, whos common sense? The collective of what = common?
=========
doesn"t your common sense suggest you to google "common sense" ?
@@Андреич-с4н You keep lol.
You are the best , blessing always
Adorable teacher!
Thanks so much!
If opposites attract, how does the atom with negatively charged electrons in the cloud around the nucleus and the positively charged protons in the nucleus keep from collapsing in on itself?
Excellent question! And I really mean that. Around the year 1900 that was the #1 question physicist had on their mind. How could that be possible? After years of experiments and theoretical work, the answer to this question birthed something you might have heard of - Quantum Mechanics. Basically, the electron can't fall all the way in and collide with the nucleus because it would violate the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle. Its beyond the scope of this lesson and this video, but it is all because of the weird way quantum mechanics works.
@@MathAndScience Could it have something to do with the repulsion of the electron between themselves actually preventing them from falling into the nucleus?
Ty. Great class.
Great teacher thanks
Great teacher i am learning so much
this complexiti still complex but i Soo Soo love it 👍👍👍👍👍👍♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️
Sir can you recommend a good physics textbook
I had to go through half of this video a few times in order to understand half of it.
very good Thanks you
I don't see how that helps in fixing todays problems. But I will keep watching!
i don't understand, what do you mean? what problems?
Knowing the basics helps you understand the complex
It will fix problems like you have to design a smoke precipitator. It will help you to get how much distance should be maintained between the two plates.
One question to the Lecturer. From Coulomb's formula: if the sum of two charges is constant, the force between these two charges reaches its maximum when the charges are equal. Like area of a rectangle with a given perimeter reaches maximum when its sides are equal. How can this be explained from physics viewpoint without using formulae?
Oh my goodness! I am thoroughly confused and wondering if I have been taught wrong or is this just another way of expressing the same thing? Here's my delima: I was taught by Malveno back in the 70's. He said that the Electron was a solid particle and when it left an atom, it left a hole behind which was a positive charge. The neucalous remained as the name implies, neutral. Also, an ion is an atom which has an extra Electron which makes it heavier than the original atom. Also, a coulomb is 6.28 x 10¹⁸ electrons. I could be wrong on that, but it was either 6.24 or 6.28, I cannot remember which. The important thing is, was I taught correctly or in correctly? It really don't matter at this juncture, for I am a 73 year old tech fossel anyway. I just don't want to lead anyone astray.
thank you very much!!!
Thank you for helping me pass
Thank You, kindly, much appreciated.
What about the fraction round to the nearest whole number please
Please set on to your all video option translate on another lenguages
Thanks a lot .. Yes I still can remember .
All FUN in Physics
Question what if you had a single pole magnet
Wonderfully tough!
Weight and balance .... Center point in Zetetic
Thanks a lot.
So That means The north side of the Magnet points South …… Correct??
amazing!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks so much.
Thanks
N Tesla .... Positive ... Neutral .... Negative ... Rule of 3 ... This is how my brain works also .... In my theory all things are light and one .... Light and Dark .... Black light is a negative neutral ... Or AC the opposite Tesla math chart
Charges and carges.
Watching always again and again from Middle East Saudi Arabia KSA OFW PILIPINO MIGRANTS WORKING ABROAD INTERNATIONAL WORLD 🌍🌎 WIDE Globally OFW PROFESSIONAL JOBS 11.5+million professionals job Pilipinos Luzon Visayas Mindanao Sabah Philippines Maharlika.
Thanks! UKULELE HOLLY BLOE USA
Magnetics=draught of particle
"same carges"? not laughing but find it funny...lol
Sir
Who is starting physics early? (I’m 7)
Wow really? You go!!!
Legend
I only did that to my dad ONCE. After I picked myself up from the floor, and apologized, I learned not to do that. Perhaps lessons such as that have been lost over the years....
Coulomb's Law---no---Henry Cavendish's Law as well as Om's, Watt's, Ferriday's, and others. None of these men "discovered" or invented any of these. it was all Henry Cavendish folks.
Henry Cavendish was born on 10 October 1731 in Nice,
It occurs because the core of the earth is spinning like a Gyroscope!!
Albert Einstein, quantum entanglement, Einstein call it “( spooky action at a distance across space & time)”……..He also said “( two particles or secretly communicating across space & time)”😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
불후방송시간이 바꿨나?
Atoms and neutrons
is Male and female
no
The lord is my shepherds i shall not want , am
but I do want. How about you? Do you want? Come on Keith, tell the truth.
I don't like the 8.99 number I'll just use 9 😤
עכשיו אני בוגר הנדסת אלקטרוניקה. אָמֵן
I don't believe in gravity
Go back to school
Your brain works like a can of menudo.
If you find out what is in menudo, you would not eat it, but if you need what it does for you, you'll want two cans of it.
Physics is science not math
Physics is both science and math
^ What the guy above me said. Physics is Science but with Math "integrated" into it
Math is the language of Science
@paul mcwhoter
thanks