@@DailyFuelUp Guess I’ll have to wait for that then. And maybe include the double chassis of the Lotus88 car and the water cooled brakes of Williams, Lotus and I think Brabham in 1982
Some of these things are at least borderline cheating but the Tyrrell P34 was just pure engineering innovation. Not a big winner but if you can't keep up go to the back row. Go big or go home! Jody Scheckter, a great driver.
Well said - the mispronunciation is shocking for someone who likes to project an expertise in F1. I look forward to their posts about the 'Red Ball' team soon 🙂
Did the narrator said right wing bans everything, at 6:22? Like the left wing wants to ban free speech? Do you really needs to gets political and loose a few viewers?
To such innovations, I'd add 4wd f1 cars which were -guess what - banned due to unfair advantage. Seriously though, some variation in the engineering of cars would be awesome to see. Regulations are so strict that every car looks the same and performance only depends on the engine and not other cool stuff like the air pump, 4wd and six wheels you mentioned. just imagine if all that stuff weren't banned
An actual article in F1 magazine asked this very question. Ferrari said they'd run a 6 wheeler with a V10 if they could get away with it. Interestingly, their designers at the time preferred to put the 4 on the rear, probably so the car wouldn't slide too much. Now there really was a 6 wheel car called the Tyrell P34. It wasn't a bad idea as it did win several races. The biggest issue was the tires were expensive and had to be custom built for that exact car. No other car could use those tires.
Right wing, left wing, front wing, rear wing, does not matter on which wing the active aero gets to be. Electronic driver aids are just that. Replacing drivers with electronic aids. We have drivers because then know when to brake, they don't just smash the brake pedal all at the same time counting on ABS to do the rest. We have drivers because they know when they lose traction and how to correct it not in order for them to all drive the same line counting on the traction control to do the rest. We have drivers to know what gear to shift into, not a computer to decide what gear/revs are the best for the car in current conditions. We have drivers for a reason. If you don't like that, then fine, just replace drivers with computers and call it a drone F1.
I liked the ground effect seasons. It surprised me how much noise the sliding skirt made on some cars. Like everyone else reading this l miss the sound of the larger atmospheric engines. They could still be hybrids with a V-10 and not sound like a sport bike.
Everyone always talks about active suspension and then say “modern road cars have it”. Yes they do, but it’s ENTIRELY different. Modern road cars will have active dampers that can be adjusted and if they have adjustable ride height it’s 99% of the time from air suspension. F1 active suspension was purely hydraulic. Where there were no springs and no dampers. It was hydraulic pistons that acted upon the system in compression and the system acted upon them in rebound. The closest system in a road car to what F1 had is the active suspension in the new Porsche Taycan Turbo GT. Where it is mostly running from a hydraulic system. It has taken 30 years to get a system in a road car that is even remotely similar to that used in F1
@@christiannasca3520 yes the ABC system. Which is actually a really good compromise between a road car active suspension and what you would see in F1. On the ABC systems, there is an air spring and adaptive damper at each corner (like most road car systems). But each spring also has a hydraulic top hat that can change the ride height and weight transfer independently to counteract cornering forces and braking/acceleration forces (similar to F1). The benefit of having both systems is you don’t have to program the hydraulic system for absorbing bumps
One of the 'T' in tnt is toluene, I've worked with that stuff and it's cool if you want to get up there really quick. But is also a great paint stripper. The guy that brought most of these items, Lotus did.
Ahhh the late Charlie Whiting, recommended by Bernie to be F1 Race Director because during his time as Cheif Mechanic in Bernie's team, Brabham, "we never had a legal car" ...it takes a master cheater to spot a cheater.
So... You can pronounce toluene but not Tyrell? That's a little disappointing. Regarding the use of ground effect on the cars:- the BBC show Horizon dedicated an episode to this many years ago. It was called "Gentleman, Raise Your Skirts" and was absolutely fascinating. Worth tracking down if you can find it somewhere.
D.A.S. = Dual AXIS System... Not Acces Nice video, but quite annoying you often use footage that differs years or even decades from the subject. Example, just one of many: BMW-Sauber, using V10 engines, had nothing to do with the BMW 4 cylinder Turbo engines from the 80s. Confusing for F1 Newbies who simply get wrong (visual) information, annoying for F1 Fans. Something to take into account for your next videos perhaps?
Ok…this trend has to stop…I get these videos are not easy to make, but you have to stop shooting the text you’re reading onto the screen one word at a time onto the screen. Either, you just give default subtitles for all lines, or you don’t. It feels lazy and uninspired. It takes effort to time the shooting of those words on screen to your voice over. Just stop..this is almost as bad as shooting vertical video.
Have You Watched My Latest Video?
The Day That Changed Formula 1 Forever.. 😨
WATCH ► th-cam.com/video/xZ6rpXz-3Vc/w-d-xo.html
Nice video, but you forgot about the double diffuser and of course the F-duct
Appreciate you mate! ❤️ Guess I’ll have to make a part 2 then… 👀
@@DailyFuelUp Guess I’ll have to wait for that then. And maybe include the double chassis of the Lotus88 car and the water cooled brakes of Williams, Lotus and I think Brabham in 1982
Some of these things are at least borderline cheating but the Tyrrell P34 was just pure engineering innovation. Not a big winner but if you can't keep up go to the back row. Go big or go home! Jody Scheckter, a great driver.
YOU MISPRONOUNCED TYRELL :((. Good video though
F*ck 😅 Appreciate you watching mate! ❤️
You mean Tyrrell? ;)
@@karenthomas7555 omg i mispelled it NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!! :(( XD
Dailyfuel misspelled it to mispronounce it right 😂
Well said - the mispronunciation is shocking for someone who likes to project an expertise in F1. I look forward to their posts about the 'Red Ball' team soon 🙂
I thought F1 was just as much about the engineering as the racing? Wielding the ban hammer like that does nothing but stunt scientific progress.
Yeah but it's either the team being to fast with the new tech that there's no competition or it's dangerous for the drivers. But it's maFIA after all.
Did the narrator said right wing bans everything, at 6:22? Like the left wing wants to ban free speech? Do you really needs to gets political and loose a few viewers?
@@Deontjie Well, the right is known for wanting to ban certain books and education
@@DeontjieI’d rather be political than fail English
@@BDSFormula1 You get US English, and the rest of the world English. I bet you are not any good at my home language either.
To such innovations, I'd add 4wd f1 cars which were -guess what - banned due to unfair advantage. Seriously though, some variation in the engineering of cars would be awesome to see. Regulations are so strict that every car looks the same and performance only depends on the engine and not other cool stuff like the air pump, 4wd and six wheels you mentioned. just imagine if all that stuff weren't banned
Imagine what F1 would look and sound like without all these restrictions
Would be so incredibly fun to watch
An actual article in F1 magazine asked this very question. Ferrari said they'd run a 6 wheeler with a V10 if they could get away with it. Interestingly, their designers at the time preferred to put the 4 on the rear, probably so the car wouldn't slide too much. Now there really was a 6 wheel car called the Tyrell P34. It wasn't a bad idea as it did win several races. The biggest issue was the tires were expensive and had to be custom built for that exact car. No other car could use those tires.
Great info, excellent delivery, I could certainly see a series on sports innovations that got banned
Of all of these, banning drivers from cycling around the track seems the most ridiculous
CVT transmission which you didn’t review
underrated channel ong. this my type of car content.
Right wing, left wing, front wing, rear wing, does not matter on which wing the active aero gets to be. Electronic driver aids are just that. Replacing drivers with electronic aids. We have drivers because then know when to brake, they don't just smash the brake pedal all at the same time counting on ABS to do the rest. We have drivers because they know when they lose traction and how to correct it not in order for them to all drive the same line counting on the traction control to do the rest. We have drivers to know what gear to shift into, not a computer to decide what gear/revs are the best for the car in current conditions. We have drivers for a reason. If you don't like that, then fine, just replace drivers with computers and call it a drone F1.
I liked the ground effect seasons. It surprised me how much noise the sliding skirt made on some cars. Like everyone else reading this l miss the sound of the larger atmospheric engines. They could still be hybrids with a V-10 and not sound like a sport bike.
You’re making great videos on F1 mate! I really hope the hard work your putting in pays off. Either way I’ve subscribed.
Thanks Chris, hope so too hahaha
Everyone always talks about active suspension and then say “modern road cars have it”. Yes they do, but it’s ENTIRELY different. Modern road cars will have active dampers that can be adjusted and if they have adjustable ride height it’s 99% of the time from air suspension. F1 active suspension was purely hydraulic. Where there were no springs and no dampers. It was hydraulic pistons that acted upon the system in compression and the system acted upon them in rebound. The closest system in a road car to what F1 had is the active suspension in the new Porsche Taycan Turbo GT. Where it is mostly running from a hydraulic system. It has taken 30 years to get a system in a road car that is even remotely similar to that used in F1
Mercedes offered a real, hydraulic active suspension in their top notch road cars at one point.
@@christiannasca3520 yes the ABC system. Which is actually a really good compromise between a road car active suspension and what you would see in F1. On the ABC systems, there is an air spring and adaptive damper at each corner (like most road car systems). But each spring also has a hydraulic top hat that can change the ride height and weight transfer independently to counteract cornering forces and braking/acceleration forces (similar to F1). The benefit of having both systems is you don’t have to program the hydraulic system for absorbing bumps
Citroën, playing with hydropneumatic suspension since the 50s, the 90s Xantia Activa was said to handle better than a Ferrari due to the suspension.
also modern cars are driven by NORMAL PEOPLE, NOT ELITE DRIVERS LIKE IN F1
It's truly captivating to witness how the heat of competition and the edge of desperation can spark strokes of genius.
'Sneaky little devils...😊'
A combination of DAS & Rear Axle assymetric braking is like the dream SpeedRacer concept.
"poor Ron Dennis"
(shows Adrian Newey)
...
😕
Fun fact: mass damper should be inspired by those from mini4wds
One of the 'T' in tnt is toluene, I've worked with that stuff and it's cool if you want to get up there really quick.
But is also a great paint stripper.
The guy that brought most of these items, Lotus did.
It was Dual Axis Steering
You think the X wings were ugly?
2014 called
13:42 blown defusour
you mentioned DAS and forgot about F-duct?
Part 2 coming soon…
F1 but they banned the car's wheels
Dont really agree with your opposition of the bans. Imagine how the cars would look like today if all these inventions would be allowed.
what ab the williams infinite gearbox?
You forgot about aston martin's endplates Idea in 2022 hungary
I have the FW08B on assetto corsa its pretty cool
I think that they should have only a few regulations so that we can see more amazing things in f1
The Irony being i dont care if it has traction control, if i wanna do a burn out, im doing a burn out
The fromt tires were smaller and wore out faster...the benefit wasn't what was thought of it.
You forget Mercedes FRIC that the anti fun police ban with the help of Karen Horner.
Part 2 coming soon…
Ur videos are so damn good narrated I thought u had 1m subscriber u deserve more :)
Tysm my brother ❤️❤️
great vid but you also need to ban those epileptic subs man
Ahhh the late Charlie Whiting, recommended by Bernie to be F1 Race Director because during his time as Cheif Mechanic in Bernie's team, Brabham, "we never had a legal car" ...it takes a master cheater to spot a cheater.
CVT
yeah the thumbnail feels like turning pure sim racing into silly arcade racing
nerd sim into braindead arcade
Always hated the killjoys that are FIA.
Ferrari hasalways loved throwing a fit over being out engineered
V10 should still be present
How does everyone forget the f duct
So... You can pronounce toluene but not Tyrell? That's a little disappointing.
Regarding the use of ground effect on the cars:- the BBC show Horizon dedicated an episode to this many years ago. It was called "Gentleman, Raise Your Skirts" and was absolutely fascinating. Worth tracking down if you can find it somewhere.
Ground effect was very dangerous
Then why did they bring them back?
The 6 wheel car
5.4 what? and the echoing edgy bits are too much
Bar.
Tyrell is pronounced 'Ti-rell' 🤣 not 'Ty-rell'
Bro, Ferrari is a law firm not a car company, why are they even in F1?
its called tirrell , not ty-rell....AI BOT
The FIA with good intentions are party poopers, let them race! Please 😮.
D.A.S. = Dual AXIS System... Not Acces
Nice video, but quite annoying you often use footage that differs years or even decades from the subject. Example, just one of many: BMW-Sauber, using V10 engines, had nothing to do with the BMW 4 cylinder Turbo engines from the 80s. Confusing for F1 Newbies who simply get wrong (visual) information, annoying for F1 Fans. Something to take into account for your next videos perhaps?
From this Video I learned that in other countries right wing parties are banning all sorts of things, while here it's the other way around.
6:12 Don't you mean, "left wing"? Right wingers allow innovations while left wingers don't.
you live in a fantasy world. right wing? innovation? gtfo
Ooo someone got butthurt
The people who refuse to accept that it’s not the 1960’s anymore? I wouldn’t call that innovative lmao
Please learn how to pronounce TYRRELL 😢😅
Ok…this trend has to stop…I get these videos are not easy to make, but you have to stop shooting the text you’re reading onto the screen one word at a time onto the screen. Either, you just give default subtitles for all lines, or you don’t. It feels lazy and uninspired. It takes effort to time the shooting of those words on screen to your voice over. Just stop..this is almost as bad as shooting vertical video.
Who is u bro
They should ban all stupid shit.
Why the photo of Hamilton’s dad ! What innovation did he give to f1 ?
His son
Every innovation that could’ve added better performance and faster laps to the cars shouldn’t have been outlawed🥲
If only it was that easy..
Then the cars wouldn't need drivers and would be doing about 300mph