I think you're walking on the wild side here....I would caution you the seek 1st answers to what you can't or don't understand....Revelation is a very rich book of insight into the last & final days which it seems like we have entered into....
@@bibletruth7014 I've never had an issue with Revelation, I find it extremely fascinating and my favorite book in the Bible...I find the Book of Acts much more questionable as to who Luke actually was and also I'm trying to research the Book of Luke...IMO, I believe that both were written closer to mid 2nd century...Jesus didn't come to the gentiles, but to the Lost sheep of the House of Israel, nor to the Samaritans...once Simon Magus was baptized (which really didn't take), his teachings were the proto-type of Paul & Maricon and Menander, a successor of Simon Magus, and then Marcion adopted 10 of Paul's teachings and a redacted version of the Gospel of Luke, s...Luke, allegedly being of Greek decent and possibly from Cyrene, located in I believe Northern Tunisia....which had Greek settlements as well as Jewish, I believe he went east to Antioch where he was associated with that church.... Ignatius of Antioch (/ɪɡˈneɪʃəs/; Greek: Ἰγνάτιος Ἀντιοχείας, translit. Ignátios Antiokheías; died c. 108/140 AD),[3][4][8][9][10] also known as Ignatius Theophorus Theophorus (Ἰγνάτιος ὁ Θεοφόρος, Ignátios ho Theophóros, 'the God-bearing'), IMO, it is more likely that Luke was writing to this person who was requesting information of Jesus and Luke, being an accomplished Greek Historian, was hired by Ignatious Theophoros to research the history of Jesus and all information....I think Luke (AKA LUKE) traveled all over Asian, the Mediterranean and Israel, collecting records and accounts of the history of Jesus & the 12...I also believe that he took, in part some of the writings of Josephus, which a number of Biblical scholars & historians have also concluded...Dr. Robert Price, also believes that Acts was written mid-second century along with Jacob Berman of History valley, TH-cam channel...The paths of Simon Magus, Paul and Queen Helena of Adiabene all cross paths in numerous places in Josephus & the NT...and Marcion reveals this in his conglomeration of the 1st canonized Bible in the mid 2nd century AD.. Revelation reveals these details of Paul being REJECTED by the Church of Ephesus....THAT IS HUGE !!! Whereas Acts tells us that Paul was REJECTED by the Church of Ephesus as well in the writings of John in Revelation 2-3, where he speaks to the 12 churches in Asia...Acts and Paul only discuss the Churches established in Rome and Galatians, Corinthians, ...Paul was NOT SUPPOSED to go to Asia...and this is where John the Apostle maintained a foothold there...& this is discussed by Polycarp as well as the group of early Christians in Asia, the Quartodeciman's who I believe kept the Sabbath & held Passover....however, the Church's of ,Rome & Antioch REJECTED Passover & decided unanimously to keep Easter Sunday in remembrance of the Resurrection, completely rejecting Passover to such a degree that they established the ruling that Easter could never occur in conjunction with Passover...so as we see, Easter is ALMOST ALWAYS celebrated the following Sunday following Passover, with the EXCEPTION of this year...where Easter was celebrated BEFORE PASSOVER...I kept Passover in March....not this late Jewish Israeli calendar happening on April 23rd...
I think you're walking on the wild side here....I would caution you the seek 1st answers to what you can't or don't understand....Revelation is a very rich book of insight into the last & final days which it seems like we have entered into....
You are right this book is truly the wild side. I would imagine I will do at least three more on this book, but watch the other 7 parts
@@bibletruth7014 I've never had an issue with Revelation, I find it extremely fascinating and my favorite book in the Bible...I find the Book of Acts much more questionable as to who Luke actually was and also I'm trying to research the Book of Luke...IMO, I believe that both were written closer to mid 2nd century...Jesus didn't come to the gentiles, but to the Lost sheep of the House of Israel, nor to the Samaritans...once Simon Magus was baptized (which really didn't take), his teachings were the proto-type of Paul & Maricon and Menander, a successor of Simon Magus, and then Marcion adopted 10 of Paul's teachings and a redacted version of the Gospel of Luke, s...Luke, allegedly being of Greek decent and possibly from Cyrene, located in I believe Northern Tunisia....which had Greek settlements as well as Jewish, I believe he went east to Antioch where he was associated with that church....
Ignatius of Antioch (/ɪɡˈneɪʃəs/; Greek: Ἰγνάτιος Ἀντιοχείας, translit. Ignátios Antiokheías; died c. 108/140 AD),[3][4][8][9][10] also known as Ignatius Theophorus Theophorus (Ἰγνάτιος ὁ Θεοφόρος, Ignátios ho Theophóros, 'the God-bearing'),
IMO, it is more likely that Luke was writing to this person who was requesting information of Jesus and Luke, being an accomplished Greek Historian, was hired by Ignatious Theophoros to research the history of Jesus and all information....I think Luke (AKA LUKE) traveled all over Asian, the Mediterranean and Israel, collecting records and accounts of the history of Jesus & the 12...I also believe that he took, in part some of the writings of Josephus, which a number of Biblical scholars & historians have also concluded...Dr. Robert Price, also believes that Acts was written mid-second century along with Jacob Berman of History valley, TH-cam channel...The paths of Simon Magus, Paul and Queen Helena of Adiabene all cross paths in numerous places in Josephus & the NT...and Marcion reveals this in his conglomeration of the 1st canonized Bible in the mid 2nd century AD..
Revelation reveals these details of Paul being REJECTED by the Church of Ephesus....THAT IS HUGE !!! Whereas Acts tells us that Paul was REJECTED by the Church of Ephesus as well in the writings of John in Revelation 2-3, where he speaks to the 12 churches in Asia...Acts and Paul only discuss the Churches established in Rome and Galatians, Corinthians, ...Paul was NOT SUPPOSED to go to Asia...and this is where John the Apostle maintained a foothold there...& this is discussed by Polycarp as well as the group of early Christians in Asia, the Quartodeciman's who I believe kept the Sabbath & held Passover....however, the Church's of ,Rome & Antioch REJECTED Passover & decided unanimously to keep Easter Sunday in remembrance of the Resurrection, completely rejecting Passover to such a degree that they established the ruling that Easter could never occur in conjunction with Passover...so as we see, Easter is ALMOST ALWAYS celebrated the following Sunday following Passover, with the EXCEPTION of this year...where Easter was celebrated BEFORE PASSOVER...I kept Passover in March....not this late Jewish Israeli calendar happening on April 23rd...