Big fan of your videos. I continue be more and more impressed. As a science educator, I’d love to be able to convey this topic as well as you, and as well as I am with other science topics. Thank you!
18:30 - predict, because I've seen people talk about the idea, basically you measure the 2 states where it's probability 0 because you'll never find them there. And somehow this will allow us to figure out they're entangles. I just have no clue how to proceed exactly...
One question I can't get an answer is can a particle be entangled with two or more other particles at the same time and so create entanglement chains ?
I really appreciate the attempt to explain difficult concepts using a bit of mathematics. However, in my opinion, this video does not escape a general rule, which I call the Exclusion Principle of the popularization of quantum mechanics. Either you try to explain the general principles without using mathematical formulas, but simply with discursive considerations (in this case the discourse is fascinating, but remains a bit abstract and generic); or you introduce calculus and then the reasoning is mathematically correct, but the magic disappears (quantum mechanics becomes a simple matter of more or less boring calculations, like classical mechanics, without anything surprising and fascinating).
I think a better way of saying it would be that measurement reveals and is always consistent with the entanglement.
"The Rules of Entanglement" sounds like the name of a 90s romcom
followed by the more enthralling The Regulations of Entanglement
Big fan of your videos. I continue be more and more impressed. As a science educator, I’d love to be able to convey this topic as well as you, and as well as I am with other science topics. Thank you!
Very clearly explained, thank you!
The first rule of quantum mechanics is "Don't talk about quantum mechanics."
and always use a properly matching quantum screwdriver
18:30 - predict, because I've seen people talk about the idea, basically you measure the 2 states where it's probability 0 because you'll never find them there. And somehow this will allow us to figure out they're entangles. I just have no clue how to proceed exactly...
Get well soon😊❤👏🏼
So, happy particles do exist!
Great presentation.
What came first, the Doa or Toa? ❤ My question is can you describe the geometry of the Aeons and Pleroma?
One question I can't get an answer is can a particle be entangled with two or more other particles at the same time and so create entanglement chains ?
Yup!
X,2x5=8[n3]
Sadly one video is deleted.
Thanks doc
Because when you measure something, thats where it is. Thats what measurement means.
This equals love,lol,❤❤❤❤
0:35 What? I thought it was don't talk about it!
😂😂💢
I really appreciate the attempt to explain difficult concepts using a bit of mathematics. However, in my opinion, this video does not escape a general rule, which I call the Exclusion Principle of the popularization of quantum mechanics. Either you try to explain the general principles without using mathematical formulas, but simply with discursive considerations (in this case the discourse is fascinating, but remains a bit abstract and generic); or you introduce calculus and then the reasoning is mathematically correct, but the magic disappears (quantum mechanics becomes a simple matter of more or less boring calculations, like classical mechanics, without anything surprising and fascinating).
Dang I'm early