IL2 1946 Me-262B2 Turboprop

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2017
  • Me-262B2 Turboprop, www.sas1946.com/main/index.php...
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 64

  • @FroggyFrog9000
    @FroggyFrog9000 6 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Such a great aspect to 1946 that there are so many cool aircraft available. I wish the developers would re-release a update to bring 46 up to BOS BOK level of graphics flight models etc.

    • @emmerad
      @emmerad 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes

    • @PORRRIDGE_GUN
      @PORRRIDGE_GUN ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I don't think much more can be done with the graphics. It certainly is greatly improved. But the best thing about '46 is the gameplay

  • @nicomeier8098
    @nicomeier8098 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    A Maus on the runway at takeoff, nice touch!

  • @MiKeMiDNiTe-77
    @MiKeMiDNiTe-77 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow it's amazing how switching to turboprops change the whole nature of the Stormbird

  • @thanosthethiccfarmer1850
    @thanosthethiccfarmer1850 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The Turboprop engines give you an eargasm

  • @SHAHROOKHSHROFF-uk7ub
    @SHAHROOKHSHROFF-uk7ub ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Messerschmitt Me - 262 :
    A perfect fly swatter for swatting flies (read : "Heavy babies" and their "nannies")
    From the crowded German skies!
    (This is how they streak earthwards : ☄☄☄☄☄☄☄☄☄☄).
    WÜNDERBAR!
    🔥🔥🔥⚡⚡⚡💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻

  • @mwmaxwgreen
    @mwmaxwgreen 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Something along similar lines, and yet, none of those who are fans of Luft 46 and whif forums is a single engine fighter, such as the FW190D or the TA152 with the same DB021 this 262 has a pair of. . I've been building a 190D with the 021 in 1/32 scale. Not sure about the history I'll have to generate(have to keep this theoretically plausible, so no fancy scifi mods and the like). Not even sure if it'd have an interceptor mission, point defense(which actually wouldn't make a whole lot of sense, as such a fighter would have to have the ability to go really fast from a near standing start, like fighters like some of the early MiG jets, including the MiG 21), a strike fighter, such as the Westland Wyvern, or even an attack role as witnessed by the Piper Enforcer, which was a modified P51 with turboprop. Still, it does offer some tantalizing possibilities.

  • @juanrios9522
    @juanrios9522 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    That turbo job looks quite more romantic than the old mean brute Me262...=)

  • @onecheman
    @onecheman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Certainly this 262 will have less problems with acceleration while landing, when the p51s and 47s came to visit em

    • @mwmaxwgreen
      @mwmaxwgreen 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes, as well as better fuel economy, which is also an important factor, given that the twin turbojets were, like all 1st or 2nd generation jet engines, were quite thirsty.And, I'm wondering something else.If the JUMO 004 and the BMW 003 were limited in operational life, average TBO being something like ten hours. If your not familiar the term, it means Time Between Overhauls.Right now, in the aviation industry, there is a move away from alloy turbine blades to ceramic, which are manufactured by old methods(casting and cooking). Might there have been a chance that one of the engineers at Junkers or other jet engine manufacturers, stumbled upon ceramics as a possible turbine blade material, and had soon after begun producing blades for all extant turbine engine designs? A 262 that could fly for as long as the fuel it carried lasted? A medium range He162? This is something to consider.

    • @user-do5zk6jh1k
      @user-do5zk6jh1k 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Also less problems deceleraring, since a windmilling prop acts like an airbrake

    • @PORRRIDGE_GUN
      @PORRRIDGE_GUN ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-do5zk6jh1k Especially if you can put it into reverse pitch.

  • @antred11
    @antred11 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Damn, the props are definitely a visual improvement on the 262.

  • @mwmaxwgreen
    @mwmaxwgreen 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You could have used a PT6, Allison 250, Kuznetsovs or any other turboprop for sound effect. Those engines sound like JT8Ds in dire need of some walnut shell.

  • @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
    @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thats the coolest bird to ever butter an airstrip. How do you say "Mosquito Swatter" in German?

    • @spitefulwar
      @spitefulwar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Fliegenklatsche.

  • @Pixy335
    @Pixy335 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The chasing crafts were rocket assisted (like La-7R) or just damaged by fuel tank puncturing?

  • @dartvader4081
    @dartvader4081 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What are u engaging? P-51s? (Sound of prop engines)
    Can't say by watching the video.

  • @skidzholeshot1316
    @skidzholeshot1316 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    05:26 who is that,is it a photo? lol

  • @VacMaster1991
    @VacMaster1991 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hey Steven 197106 how do i install this plane? Is it the same proses you told me earlier

    • @Steven197106
      @Steven197106  6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      drop the folder in waw and then go to STD folder com, open each folder till you come to the air file then open and all your aircraft are listed here, now add the lines in the 262TFP folder like under the 262 section in the german pit add , Me-262A-V1 air.ME_262AV1 2 g01 SUMMER

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I just looked i already have this plane XD

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also if you have any recommendations for texture or sound upgrades for Luftwaffe planes just tell me.

  • @PorscheGTRSWeissach
    @PorscheGTRSWeissach 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wow! This Turboprop version looks much better than the standard Me-262's! :-)

  • @aries-3536
    @aries-3536 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dam well thought out Sir,
    but if you look at it from a different angle like I did and have, a 262 with the following:
    Drop tanks,
    After Burners,
    Speed brakes,
    Movable tail planes.
    try that......

    • @A.G.798
      @A.G.798 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mit Panzer abwerfen sind abwerfbare Zusatztanks gemeint, hält ein blödes Übersetzungsprogramm.

  • @creative-anon-ca______4560
    @creative-anon-ca______4560 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good

  • @benlaskowski357
    @benlaskowski357 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    😳 Wow!

  • @bruceruttan60
    @bruceruttan60 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Looks like about 6K alt.

  • @__dINe__
    @__dINe__ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    b2 or b1?!

  • @stephenclay2763
    @stephenclay2763 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Too much straight line flight, in-out, in-out. Can the Me262 B2 dogfight or do torque turns? Didn't see much of that here. Energy state fighting is so inefficient against other fighters.

  • @sucherso-sein6769
    @sucherso-sein6769 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hat es dieses Flugzeug tatsächlich gegeben, oder nur die Konstruktionspläne davon ?

    • @kg_sroberth2238
      @kg_sroberth2238 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      nur Blaupausen... :)

    • @sucherso-sein6769
      @sucherso-sein6769 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Vielen Dank, Floyd :oD

    • @kg_sroberth2238
      @kg_sroberth2238 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kein Problem :)

    • @Steven197106
      @Steven197106  6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Papier entworfen, nie produziert

    • @sucherso-sein6769
      @sucherso-sein6769 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Auch Dir Steven vielen Dank. Ist schon ein sehr geiles Flugzeug (im Spiel).

  • @bruceruttan60
    @bruceruttan60 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cruising at 420 with a pair of nose drops?

  • @micktv1117
    @micktv1117 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Графика класс.что за мод?

  • @4137fy
    @4137fy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    螺旋槳???

  • @A.G.798
    @A.G.798 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Na ja, was soll das bringen, da würde ich doch ein reines Strahltriebwerk vorziehen! Mehr Zeug dran,kann auch mehr Kaputt gehen. Technisch gesehen wäre ein Nachbrenner gut.

  • @Mossi-fd4es
    @Mossi-fd4es 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Il 2 1946 CUP?

    • @Steven197106
      @Steven197106  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      vp modpack

    • @Mossi-fd4es
      @Mossi-fd4es 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Steven 197106 where find?

    • @jesseboombatts
      @jesseboombatts 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      www.sas1946.com/main/index.php?topic=50919.0

  • @niume7468
    @niume7468 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    did germans even had Turboprops?

    • @Pixy335
      @Pixy335 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      In projects certainly, and maybe some early prototypes were constructed, but i'm only few % sure, don't rely on me here.

    • @Steven197106
      @Steven197106  6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      paper designed, never produced

    • @adamweaver4195
      @adamweaver4195 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      lots of paper designs were drawn up. a good resource would be luft'46.com

    • @KylleinMacKellerann
      @KylleinMacKellerann 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      They had designs but lacked the materials to make a reliable jet engine, and since turbo-props use a second set of turbines past the power turbines to generate take-off power (for the props, not the flight) they never achieved reality. All things considered, using those early jets to power props made more sense than using them as pure reaction engines.

    • @JohnDoe-ee6qs
      @JohnDoe-ee6qs 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      NiumeLT they invented them and there were many types built before the and of the war and countless others on the drawing board, but as far as I know these were never put into airframes as the war ended before this could happen.

  • @farmerman7947
    @farmerman7947 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    One problem is, turboprops guzzle fuel

    • @__dINe__
      @__dINe__ 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      true, but much much less than the jumo 004, that was the big change.

    • @vumba1331
      @vumba1331 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Jugs were not known for being frugal, they really guzzled top grade avgas whereas these would theoretically run on diesel or kerosene, much cheaper and more readily available. The Jugs also consumed huge amounts of oil so their flight times were at times limited.

  • @johnanthonyalberola6252
    @johnanthonyalberola6252 ปีที่แล้ว

    THEY ARE GIVEN TO MUCH TIME TO DAMADE A TARGET ZONE

  • @solopeyton7168
    @solopeyton7168 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Weint auf deutsch

  • @kingstondailey9074
    @kingstondailey9074 ปีที่แล้ว

    B gxl
    Lo