Like how that american company had so big domination in F1. If they bought to all exepect Ferrari. Why did they go then sell them in the 80s to anymore get few wins, so now Ferrari, Mercedes and Reunalt have gone past Ford.
The Ford Cosworth DFV engine was widely used by most garagista teams in the 70's due to it's cost, power and reliability, if I'm not wrong there was a season sometime in the 70's that the only engine on the grid other than the DFV was Ferrari's
@@almeidaariel9 It was also and possibly crucially, much lighter than anything else at the time. Especially since the 70's was when more emphasis was placed on aerodynamics rather than brutish V12 Italian grunt.
Keep in mind that nowadays they race more than 20 Gps per season. Back in the 50s they raced 10 races per season and about 16 up until the 2010s. Ferrari Alfa Romeo Maserati would have WAY more wins if they raced 20 GPs back in those years as well
In the 50s to the early 80s there were 20+ race per year, but only a few counted in the World Championship. And lot of drivers run in F2 races as well.
@Canadian 009 It's a matter of knowledge, Not statements. F1 in the 50s was very basic and It got much more sofisticated going into the 60s-70s & 80s. Mercedes at the time was 100% Behind in all Those aspects and you Just Need to look at their Road Cars of the time to realize It. Mercedes would Not have been able to match the likes of Lotus McLaren Ferrari Williams in terms of aero and chassis and probably Not even engine Power/reliability ratio. Finally, history shows that in F1 aero Is more important than Power. Ferrari for example dominated with Schumacher in the early 2000s but during some of those seasons the Ferrari engine was Not the most powerful One. Still, there is no Way that Mercedes would have been able to match the top dogs in the 70s and 80s. And even in the 90s (they would have made their own team instead of Just making the engine if that was the case). Finally, Mercedes during These last 8 years has been MASSIVELY helped by the FIA and It was during These last years that they won most of their races. And this Is another element : Mercedes has won races with Just 2 engine formats, Ferrari with all of them
@Haarish Kannan Le Mans disaster in 1955 that killed more than 80 people, including one driver, so Mercedes was retired in every Motorsport championship
@Haarish Kannan, no not that, the body panels were made from magnesium and when they tried to put the fire out with water it exploded... again. Magnesium and some other light metal fires were not understood back then.
Go Repco! Built in a small factory in Richmond, Victoria, Australia (starting with an American block). It was a world beater. The rest of the European F1 community mustn't have known what hit them. Good on you Jack and team.
Actually it was one of the weakest of the field with the same size of block. 1966 was a turning point in F1. The formula from F2 turned back to F1 with an increased displacement 3000 max for NA. Repco and Ferrari were the only teams to kick off the season with the right size of engine. 70% of the field had underpowered 2.0-2.5 litre engines. But Repco was an unbeatable beast right from the beginning. Is was a good engine in good hands. Sir Black Jack was amazing.
@@sheldensummers8317 yes but the hybrid era in general is millennial anyways lol but what I mean was with out a massive budget the normal aspersion engines revved so hard they just sounded so much better when running comp to nowadays.. Good fun tho to see what can be squeezed out a 1.5 v6 turbo
I love how totto said in an interview to teams that want to join that they can't just enter and start winning while Mercedes entered in 2010 and took them 4 years to just dominate for eight years
Bro the 2018 section was entertaining 😂, slowly but surely Renault was catching up to Ford and then like 2 races after out of nowhere mercedes overtakes
@@martinpapin4944 it was Mercedes fault. They made a car out of magnesium alloy which burnt when trying to douse the flames while also a lot of other engineering liberties they took
@@ananayjoshi most the ppl died in the initial impact of the car smashing into the crowd, a few died from the flames. Its stupid to blame mercedes for the incident instead of the hosts for not having a safe enough environment.
If Alonso knows how to extract the most out of an underperforming car, Vettel can extract the most out of a tailor made car. No one had better synergy than Vettel in the right redbull.
French manufacturers made several remarkable race cars in every discipline could be rally, hill climb or track cars like F1, so do not underestimate them. They are just lazy to produce roadgoing cars which lives up others expectation, but they are quite content with their own products anyway. Italians has some similar spirit as well, because they miss the quality control. But design concepts in these 2 nations are generally way ahead of the rest of the World.
And the Alfa Romeo Tipo 158 they win the 1950 championship with. It has entered 41 Grand Prixs between 1938 and 1951 and won 37 of them. In the 1950 F1 season it won each and every race with a 1-2 podium finish but the Italian GP where they had only 1st and 3rd places. They did not compete on the Indy 500 as none of the other F1 competitors did.
I would throw in the McLaren M23 and Ferrari 126C2. The McLaren was still competitive in good hands five years after it first turned a wheel. The 126C2 is a sleeper. Hardly anyone knows about it. It won the 1982 constructors championship, despite missing two races altogether and running only one car in six others. They finished the year with a totally different driver lineup from what they started with. Andretti, then aged 42, was called in to replace Pironi at Monza and despite having never driven the car before and having been out of F1 for two years, put the bastard on pole.
Ford Cosworth: *Enters the sport as engine supplier *gets 155 wins across various teams, supplies more than half the field at once for several years *leaves *refuses to elaborate further
I work for Cosworth, we would love to build F1 engines again but the cost to develop a F1 engine is so expensive that we just can't afford to attempt it, especially without a team already lined up to buy it.
Ferrari are amazing, a small company from Modena, now the number one brand in the World. What amazed me, is that there are no English engine companies anymore, yet all the teams are based in the UK, bar Ferrari.
@@AdamTheMan1993 yeh, but engineered in Germany. Is there any enginees actuengineered in the UK, or in the UK do they just build them as per designs from abroad? Not sure, just curious. RB too will simply work, build the HONDA engine. I initially thought they were building their own, but then understood that's not the case! Just surprised tbh, everything in F1 is in the UK bar actually engineering the engine! Not one English engine in F1!
The design of the Cosworth DFV was remarkable, as with some modifications to the engine displacement and fuel injection, it was adapted for USAC Indy Champ Car racing (and later in the CART series) as the DFX; running on alcohol; and turbocharged; which provided Cosworth with over a decade of revenue with supplying customers in those North American racing series. In addition, despite the vibration issues the Cosworth DFV had that made it less suitable for endurance sports car racing, it managed to be the powerplant for two Le Mans victories: 1975 & 1980.
Can you please change the name from Ford to Cosworth? I'm tired of correcting americans in the comments who boast about something they had nothing to do with. Cosworth were the engines, not Ford.
Kinda crazy that the hilariously named Coventry Climax went toe to toe with Ferrari in the 60's, but then even more crazy how the Ford Cosworth caught up so quickly and dominated in the 70's!
Possibly one aspect that may have retarded the Ferrari success in 1960s F1 efforts was Enzo Ferrari's passion for the sports car racing series back then; primarily with endurance racing and dabbling in the Can Am series; as it spread out the team's resources too thinly, which left the F1 effort coming up short for several years; that is, until Ferrari got out of sports car racing competition.
@@freddarau Except that Cosworth started as Cosworth, got funding from Ford with Ford branding as a stipulation, but continued to design and build F1 engines in the UK... In the Cosworth plant. So you just made some shit up.
@@animalmother5902 Cosworth built their own engines, from block casting up. They then sold their casting technology to Ford in 91, WAY after these engines won all the championships. During Cosworth's success Ford provided funding but the design and manufacturing was carried out by Cosworth in the UK. Ford wasn't the only company they partnered with and Ford's contribution appears to be commercial only.
Ferrari in the 50’s, 60’s and 00’s, Ford in the 70’s, Honda in the 80’s, 90’s and 10’s, Renault I’m the 80’s, 90’s, 00’s and 10’s and Mercedes in the 00’s and 10’s be like: _stonks_
Coventry Climax hasn't entered a race as an engine maker in 53 years (and doesn't even exist anymore), and they're still sixth all-time in wins behind five huge corporations.
I recall the engine division was merged with Jaguars engine division when Jaguar bought the Coventry Climax company, Walter Hassan went on to develop the Jaguar V12 engine whilst the Fork Lift side was sold by British Leyland.
Interesting seeing Repco and Climax on the list. The use of the Repco engine for the Brabham chassis had me mystified in this one respect: Would you agree that in F1, it is the chassis name that comes before the engine? Such as with "McLaren-Honda"? Well, in the 1960s I always recalled the Brabham F1 racers being branded as "Repco-Brabham." The engine name before the chassis name was unique, indeed! There is plenty of info to be found online about the Repco engined powered Brabhams in the 1960s. Climax engines were interesting, as they were there at the start of the F1 mid-engine (or some would say "rear-engine") revolution in F1 racing in the late 1950s with Cooper; and powered the Lotus team up through the 1965 season. The FIA going to the 3-liter formula in 1966 put the engine maker out-of-the-running; as by some accounts, Coventry-Climax gave up being a F1 engine supplier.
Mercedes' dominance in the turbo-hybrid era is just astounding. They became only the second engine manufacturer after Ferrari to breach the 200 win mark despite not having competed in F1 far less often than Ferrari.
@@justamanchimp The Cosworth DFV is the greatest racing engine ever built, it's amazing that it was competitive from the late 1960's through to the early 1980's
And the turbocharged & alcohol fueled version of that engine, the DFX, dominated the North American Indy Car series from the late 1970s to the late 1980s.
As a person who is not a petrolhead/gearhead, after watching this video, I now understand the significance of the movie: Ford vs Ferrari. Also, I'm quite surprised Mercedez only started seeing consistent success in the late 90s...
They only really started seeing success in the 90s as they had left F1 in the mid-50s due to the 1955 Le Mans disaster. A Mercedes car launched into a crowd of spectators, and out of shame the company dropped motor racing entirely for about 40 years or so! So that makes it even more impressive, personally, that they came back from such a long hiatus, and still had a front-running engine/car the whole way.
You really don't. First of all that Ford. vs. Ferrari movie is some of the most ridiculous American propaganda ever, and paints an entirely wrong picture, which in reality was that Ferrari didn't care about something that Ford cared a lot about and managed to beat Ferrari in it. Inferiority complex by Ford. Second, Ford had nothing to do with F1. These engines were designed, engineered and built by Cosworth in the UK. Ford was just one of the biggest financers, they had nothing to do with the development. 100% UK made engines.
@Kody Moodley . . . Some have contended that Enzo Ferrari's passion for sports cars, with devoting the racing efforts to the sports cars endurance series and to the Can Am series, may have set back the F1 efforts in the late 1960s into the '70s.
@@derbigpr500 Myself an old-timer, I followed the racing scene in the years that the Ford vs Ferrari movie covered, and it bothered me with the amount of liberties (or "dramatic license") and omissions that was done in that movie; and this is from an American perspective.
Thanks for the support. Maybe it is not blowing, one video went up in views now it is going down with views, but I will try to improve on content to get the views back up :)
@@mahattahamovich3983 He means the power unit wins. Lewis has never raced for a manufacturer that does not use Mercedes engines. He entered the sport with McLaren-Mercedes, then moved to the Mercedes-AMG team. Both used Mercedes engines. So all 103 of his wins were brought to him with Mercedes power.
I didn't realize that the Lotus-Ford partnership at the Indy 500 predated Lotus-Ford in F1 by a full four years, but the real mindfuck was figuring out that Brabham didn't yet have BMW engines in 1981. I always assumed the split graphic on the nose was a BMW thing, but I guess it's something BMW adopted later on. I love the BMW livery whether it's on a Brabham, a Sauber, or the 2000 Williams.
Considering how long Ferrari is around, they are actually doing pretty bad in this chart lol I was surprised by Renault tho, never knew that a Renault driven car won that much. And the Mercedes man, phew, that domincance was something else. 2022 season, i'm ready!
the engine is only 1/3 the battle... You need the car itself and the driver as the other 2/3... I'm sure toyota made great engines but bad cars and no amazing talent... mostly new drivers and old talent washed up..
@@SirRobbins I just said they nerly won in Malaysia 2009 (a rain race) and if you watch or rewatch the race, it is just fact. I don't judge their cars or the talent of the drivers
@@arnaudmilome7740 I was replying to the OP, not you. You're right they nearly did win one race but I feel Toyota made a competitive engine, just not a competitive car
- The parody leading up to the 70's was CRAZY - 70's Ford Era (Cosworth Engine was just too nutty) - 80's Parody (Honda, Renault, Porsche Tag, Renault, with the occasional Ferrari win, & BMW making cameos) - 90's 1st Renault Domination (Honda still a winner, Mercedes returning and winning, Ford in it's dying years but still winning races, Ferrari not really up to snuff until later in the decade) - 00's Ferrari domination (Mercedes & Renault still winners later on & BMW, Honda, & Ford Cameos while Toyota couldn't reach the brass ring) - 10's 2nd Renault Domination followed by Mercedes Domination (Honda coming back from scratch while Ferrari fails to win anything more than just races) - 20's Too soon to tell. Mercedes & Honda deadlocked through the 2nd year but time will tell after 2020 Mercedes domination (Ferrari & Renault lacking big time so far)
Petite question sur les probables victoire de red bull cette année, seront t-il attribué à red bull ou à Honda ? Small question on the probable victory of red bull this year, will it be attributed to red bull or to Honda?
Cette année ce sera sûrement RB sachant qu'Honda se retire. Nonobstant il est vrai que le moteur est développé par Honda pour 2022 donc on ne sais pas trop.
Je pense à Red Bull eux-mêmes puisque le moteur devrait porter leur nom, à moins qu'il ne s'occupe que de "rebadger" le moteur Honda avec une collaboration plus étroite
One of the things this video is wrong is counting Mugen-Honda as Honda. Despite preparing Honda engines, they were not badged as official Honda. You can check this here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formula_One_engines#Most_wins_in_a_season
cosworth backed out after deeming the hybrid units to complex and costly to design and construct... It was a sad day to see cosworth go. They ran the last V10s in F1 in 2006 when everyone else went to V8s.
COSWORTH, not Ford. Ford had nothing to do with it. It's a British company with British engineers and engines made and designed there. Keep your nationalism away from F1.
Oh please can we see Climax back on the grid in 2022.... Oh shit, when I started typing that they had 2 wins, Now its 39. Seems they were more than an innuendo.
Putting a Ford badge on Cosworth engine is really unfair and makes it seem like Ford had something to do with F1, which is false. Cosworth was a British company (and still is) completely and entirely unrelated to Ford road cars.
so it's their fault they were better than everyone at adapting, I'm just saying if this domination happend with ferrari your small brain wouldn't say the same thing
@@antonelloboccardi991 And the FIA & F1 did many things to try and stop the Merc dominance. But they only proved to be the best team at adapting to new regulations. The cream rises to the top!!
@@antonelloboccardi991 Ferrari was pretty darn good 2006-2019. Renault had Benetton and Williams in the 1990's. Mercedes and Ferrari started breaking up that domination in 1997 ..BMW in 2001 with 14 wins with Ralf, Juan Pablo and Robert.
@@antonelloboccardi991 bernie ha detto non troppo tempo fa che quando era in possesso della f1 fece il possibile per far vincere vettel e la ferrari in generale. Inoltre la fia ha cercato di annullare il vantaggio della mercedes principalmente nel 2017 e 2021 (riuscendo finalmente a far creare agli altri una macchina migliore della loro) Nel 2006 la fia rese illegale il mass damper a metà stagione, dopo averlo giudicato legale all'inizio, e questo penalizzò sopratutto la renault (1 in campionato con alonso). Dopo questo, la ferrari era la miglior macchina Quando la Ferrari dominava nei primi 2000 pensi che lo sport fosse più bello? O lo dici solo perché ti da fastidio che fin'ora la mercedes sia stata il miglior team per anni? Meglio quando la fia veniva chiamata ferrari international assistance...
Ford I believe in 1974 and 1975 was supplying every team except for Ferrari, no wonder they dominated this classification
Yess, all grid except Ferrari
And they had a budget that was like 5 times bigger than the one Ferrari had in regards to the development
@@giuseppemaggio5894 yes and still Ferrari won the 75,76,77
Like how that american company had so big domination in F1. If they bought to all exepect Ferrari. Why did they go then sell them in the 80s to anymore get few wins, so now Ferrari, Mercedes and Reunalt have gone past Ford.
The engines were British really.
Ford really just supplied rival teams with the same engine and then laughed all the way to the bank in the 70s huh.
Lmao
Like Mercedes is doing now... they have 8 cars on the track.
@@javiazar except they are the only team that are winning (under normal circumstances) with those engines
Practically all teams except Ferrari during those times, practically a spec series.
@@gpaje you like the word practically don't you?
nice vid! i didn't know ford had such a presence in the 70's
Ford/Cosworth engines were pretty common sight on the F1 grid till the early 2000s
Yeah, the DFV engine was one of the greatest of all time
The ford DFV is probably one of the most prevalent engines in the entire history of F1 lol.
The Ford Cosworth DFV engine was widely used by most garagista teams in the 70's due to it's cost, power and reliability, if I'm not wrong there was a season sometime in the 70's that the only engine on the grid other than the DFV was Ferrari's
@@almeidaariel9 It was also and possibly crucially, much lighter than anything else at the time. Especially since the 70's was when more emphasis was placed on aerodynamics rather than brutish V12 Italian grunt.
Toro Rosso win in 2008 was the only Ferrari customer engine win
Vettel's first win
And here comes Sebastian Vettel
Are you serious?
@@icantthinkofagoodname7012 yes
Keep in mind that nowadays they race more than 20 Gps per season. Back in the 50s they raced 10 races per season and about 16 up until the 2010s. Ferrari Alfa Romeo Maserati would have WAY more wins if they raced 20 GPs back in those years as well
Actually they raced like 20 races per year back in the 50's but only 7 give points
In the 50s to the early 80s there were 20+ race per year, but only a few counted in the World Championship. And lot of drivers run in F2 races as well.
@Canadian 009 No. It was an excuse to leave as undefeated. They knew they didn't have the resources to keep winminh
@Canadian 009 It's a matter of knowledge, Not statements. F1 in the 50s was very basic and It got much more sofisticated going into the 60s-70s & 80s. Mercedes at the time was 100% Behind in all Those aspects and you Just Need to look at their Road Cars of the time to realize It. Mercedes would Not have been able to match the likes of Lotus McLaren Ferrari Williams in terms of aero and chassis and probably Not even engine Power/reliability ratio. Finally, history shows that in F1 aero Is more important than Power. Ferrari for example dominated with Schumacher in the early 2000s but during some of those seasons the Ferrari engine was Not the most powerful One. Still, there is no Way that Mercedes would have been able to match the top dogs in the 70s and 80s. And even in the 90s (they would have made their own team instead of Just making the engine if that was the case). Finally, Mercedes during These last 8 years has been MASSIVELY helped by the FIA and It was during These last years that they won most of their races. And this Is another element : Mercedes has won races with Just 2 engine formats, Ferrari with all of them
@@johnstratos9336 .. and in sportscar racing like Le Mans, Mille Miglia, Coppa Panamericana, you can name it...
Mercedes counter stops at 9 after 1955.
Those who dont know:😁
Those who know:😨
@Haarish Kannan Le Mans disaster in 1955 that killed more than 80 people, including one driver, so Mercedes was retired in every Motorsport championship
Indeed.
An horrible incident.
@Rcemn yea, exactly!
@Haarish Kannan, no not that, the body panels were made from magnesium and when they tried to put the fire out with water it exploded... again. Magnesium and some other light metal fires were not understood back then.
9:19 the Only time ferrari engine won in a non ferrari car
Yes
Was wondering if this happened, thank you
The the anomaly was something called Sebastian Vettel
Great catch, I was looking for that. Thanks!!
You'd think that's crazy but then you see Ferrari vs the teams they supplied in 2021......
Go Repco! Built in a small factory in Richmond, Victoria, Australia (starting with an American block). It was a world beater. The rest of the European F1 community mustn't have known what hit them. Good on you Jack and team.
Is this the origin of Repco auto parts stores?
That's the one, actually they gained fame for cooperation with Brabham, they were producing car parts way before F1 :)
Actually it was one of the weakest of the field with the same size of block. 1966 was a turning point in F1. The formula from F2 turned back to F1 with an increased displacement 3000 max for NA. Repco and Ferrari were the only teams to kick off the season with the right size of engine. 70% of the field had underpowered 2.0-2.5 litre engines. But Repco was an unbeatable beast right from the beginning. Is was a good engine in good hands. Sir Black Jack was amazing.
@@skipdonahue4440 at least it beat the Ferrari.
Indeed! Ferrari had insane amount of experience in F1, still Repco was beat them for 2 years in a row!!! But after the DFV Cosworth changed anything.
Video was well made. Didn't realise Ford had that big of an impact and success in the early decades of F1
It's cosworth British company that makes engine with Fords badge
Quality engine builders shame the old skool has gone and we now have the millennial shite ti deal with ...
@@gaz10182 well you say millennial shite, the PU winning the most grand Prix of the last decade is the car manufacturer that's the oldest 🤣
@@sheldensummers8317 yes but the hybrid era in general is millennial anyways lol but what I mean was with out a massive budget the normal aspersion engines revved so hard they just sounded so much better when running comp to nowadays.. Good fun tho to see what can be squeezed out a 1.5 v6 turbo
@@gaz10182 i dont think s millinieal made hybrid turnbo engines
impresive how good renault is.
Thats bc of Alonso and the red bull engine thats why is high but is impressive
@@jayceebelino2646 and also Williams
@Jaycee Belino2 No that was a renault engine
@@robinsenechal1465 Williams in 90s had Renault Engine
Correction: was
I love how totto said in an interview to teams that want to join that they can't just enter and start winning while Mercedes entered in 2010 and took them 4 years to just dominate for eight years
They had an engine program for years with McLaren. Given their domination was very engine based, you can't ignore that.
It took them an Engine change to be dominant they were a midfield at best in the V8 era
They got it almost perfect with the v6 rule change
yeah same with RB they joined in 2005 and became contenders 5 years later and won 6 years later
It only took red bull a few years to dominate but they didn’t dominate for long
Coventry Climax was dropped from the top 5 only in 2003.
THEY WENT BANKRUPT IN 1986!!
when ferrari finally surpassed ford in the 2000s enzo was probably in his grave like 'mama mia I finally beat henry ford 2!'
You realize Cosworth and Ford aren't the same? American Ford has nothing to do with F1. Literally. It's a British company that developed F1 engines.
@@derbigpr500 you realize that I dont care and just made a joke right
@@derbigpr500 Ford is Ford .
This man deserves more subs!
Thanks man! Hold tight more videos incoming ;)
Bro the 2018 section was entertaining 😂, slowly but surely Renault was catching up to Ford and then like 2 races after out of nowhere mercedes overtakes
Good to see that the last renault engine victory was by an actual renault and not redbull lol
Still really proud of Honda. Same manufacturer of my SuperCub
i love renault . itse good result.
It was wierd when Mercedes needed so long, then I remembered they were out of the sport after that horrible crash that killed many people.
It's not Mercedes fault's it was this concurents was so bad
@@martinpapin4944 well i do think killing like 50 people with your car at le man can be seen as your fault
@@dylanboot152 it's not about fault really, it's negative marketing... Today is different
@@martinpapin4944 it was Mercedes fault. They made a car out of magnesium alloy which burnt when trying to douse the flames while also a lot of other engineering liberties they took
@@ananayjoshi most the ppl died in the initial impact of the car smashing into the crowd, a few died from the flames. Its stupid to blame mercedes for the incident instead of the hosts for not having a safe enough environment.
10:19 vettel just dominates
Also the only driver to win a race with a ferrari engine that isn't in a ferrari in monza 2008
9 wins in a row is ridiculous when you realize Hamilton has had that Mercedes for years and never made it past 5.
@@Ruben-to9yk give vettel a good car and he will extract every ounce of performence. Ik hamilton was great but Vettels dominance was menacing.
If Alonso knows how to extract the most out of an underperforming car, Vettel can extract the most out of a tailor made car. No one had better synergy than Vettel in the right redbull.
@@0megalul309 thats a great comparison
great video this must have been quite a bit of work love what your doing
Thanks for support!
Renault is really a big F1 engine manufacturer.. one of the best! Very impressive considering their car line up :)
French engineering ! Remember the Renault FT in 1917 ;)
French manufacturers made several remarkable race cars in every discipline could be rally, hill climb or track cars like F1, so do not underestimate them. They are just lazy to produce roadgoing cars which lives up others expectation, but they are quite content with their own products anyway. Italians has some similar spirit as well, because they miss the quality control. But design concepts in these 2 nations are generally way ahead of the rest of the World.
That is a brilliant graphic. Thank you so much.
the only thing i learned is the McLaren mp4/4, Ferrari f2004 and the Mercedes w11 are possibly the greatest f1 cars ever
And FW14 ?
The RB08 (RB from 2013) ?
And the Alfa Romeo Tipo 158 they win the 1950 championship with. It has entered 41 Grand Prixs between 1938 and 1951 and won 37 of them. In the 1950 F1 season it won each and every race with a 1-2 podium finish but the Italian GP where they had only 1st and 3rd places. They did not compete on the Indy 500 as none of the other F1 competitors did.
I would throw in the McLaren M23 and Ferrari 126C2. The McLaren was still competitive in good hands five years after it first turned a wheel. The 126C2 is a sleeper. Hardly anyone knows about it. It won the 1982 constructors championship, despite missing two races altogether and running only one car in six others. They finished the year with a totally different driver lineup from what they started with. Andretti, then aged 42, was called in to replace Pironi at Monza and despite having never driven the car before and having been out of F1 for two years, put the bastard on pole.
F1-75 Ferrari this year is going to be good
Peterson was an absolute beast in the early 70's.. Sad that he never won the Title...
From the early 2000’s on this really shows the lack of depth in F1 competition.
So the whole 70's and 80's was any better? Ford won everytime
ROFL...lack of depth? That's when the competition started.... before 2000's F1 was one or two good drivers and the rest useless.
@@alexstromberg7696 Yes but with different teams. Unlike Merc
Ford Cosworth:
*Enters the sport as engine supplier
*gets 155 wins across various teams, supplies more than half the field at once for several years
*leaves
*refuses to elaborate further
I work for Cosworth, we would love to build F1 engines again but the cost to develop a F1 engine is so expensive that we just can't afford to attempt it, especially without a team already lined up to buy it.
Wow, that's cool. Do you have some memorabilia around the office or something? :)
Hopefully Ford interested to comeback in 2025 or 2026
Ford Ragequit in 2004 thanks to how awful Jaguar was kek
@@whatifgoddoesntcare since f1 is aiming for cheaper and simpler engines in 2025/6, might we see a cosworth comeback? That would be awesome!
man, just puts into perspective the dominance of anything with a dfv
Ferrari are amazing, a small company from Modena, now the number one brand in the World. What amazed me, is that there are no English engine companies anymore, yet all the teams are based in the UK, bar Ferrari.
I think Haas and apha tauri are also based in italy. Alfa Romeo is based in switzerland.
@@DarthKaese oh, did not know that. Interesting though. Let's hope this next season will be a good one.
Mercedes F1 engines are currently built in Brixworth, UK
@@DarthKaese Haas are mainly bassed in Kannapolis, USA but have a European base in Banbury
@@AdamTheMan1993 yeh, but engineered in Germany. Is there any enginees actuengineered in the UK, or in the UK do they just build them as per designs from abroad? Not sure, just curious. RB too will simply work, build the HONDA engine. I initially thought they were building their own, but then understood that's not the case! Just surprised tbh, everything in F1 is in the UK bar actually engineering the engine! Not one English engine in F1!
Last win for BMW belongs to Robert Kubica. I think it will last till next century 😁
The design of the Cosworth DFV was remarkable, as with some modifications to the engine displacement and fuel injection, it was adapted for USAC Indy Champ Car racing (and later in the CART series) as the DFX; running on alcohol; and turbocharged; which provided Cosworth with over a decade of revenue with supplying customers in those North American racing series.
In addition, despite the vibration issues the Cosworth DFV had that made it less suitable for endurance sports car racing, it managed to be the powerplant for two Le Mans victories: 1975 & 1980.
Mercedes' momentum and dominance over the past ten years is comparable to Ford Cossworth's dominance in the past!
they just delivered to every team except Ferrari^^
Nice one, but if I were you, I would speed the video up a bit
Yep, max 5 mins long
Coventry Climax sounds like totally different kind of thrusting than burning gasoline.
Can you please change the name from Ford to Cosworth? I'm tired of correcting americans in the comments who boast about something they had nothing to do with. Cosworth were the engines, not Ford.
Kinda crazy that the hilariously named Coventry Climax went toe to toe with Ferrari in the 60's, but then even more crazy how the Ford Cosworth caught up so quickly and dominated in the 70's!
Possibly one aspect that may have retarded the Ferrari success in 1960s F1 efforts was Enzo Ferrari's passion for the sports car racing series back then; primarily with endurance racing and dabbling in the Can Am series; as it spread out the team's resources too thinly, which left the F1 effort coming up short for several years; that is, until Ferrari got out of sports car racing competition.
I have been looking for this video for ages
I love how people keep saying Ford, Ford in comments when thos engines are Cosworth.
There using ford factories In Detroit, using ford money into ford cars, there as ford as it gets.
@@freddarau Except that Cosworth started as Cosworth, got funding from Ford with Ford branding as a stipulation, but continued to design and build F1 engines in the UK... In the Cosworth plant. So you just made some shit up.
@@-BuddyGuy Maybe the only time that the engines was named as Ford is McLaren Ford in 90s?
But who is cosworth buying the engine from?
@@animalmother5902 Cosworth built their own engines, from block casting up. They then sold their casting technology to Ford in 91, WAY after these engines won all the championships. During Cosworth's success Ford provided funding but the design and manufacturing was carried out by Cosworth in the UK. Ford wasn't the only company they partnered with and Ford's contribution appears to be commercial only.
criminal, seb won in Canada 2019
Ferrari in the 50’s, 60’s and 00’s, Ford in the 70’s, Honda in the 80’s, 90’s and 10’s, Renault I’m the 80’s, 90’s, 00’s and 10’s and Mercedes in the 00’s and 10’s be like:
_stonks_
You could actually split the 60's between Ferrari and Ford since, the 60's was mostly contested between Brabham, Lotus, Ferrari, Matra and Tyrell.
Great work! 👍👍
This is a well made video. SUBSCRIBED
When this channel has like 100k (cuz it will soon) i can say i was here since 250 lol
Thanks for the support :)
It's interesting to see that current 4 manufacturers are in the top 5. Many years passed but still they want to compete in F1
Coventry Climax hasn't entered a race as an engine maker in 53 years (and doesn't even exist anymore), and they're still sixth all-time in wins behind five huge corporations.
I recall the engine division was merged with Jaguars engine division when Jaguar bought the Coventry Climax company, Walter Hassan went on to develop the Jaguar V12 engine whilst the Fork Lift side was sold by British Leyland.
Very impressive Ferrari❤️🔥🇮🇹💪🏻
That cosworth engine was epic. Any cosworth engine is epic infact 😎
Interesting seeing Repco and Climax on the list.
The use of the Repco engine for the Brabham chassis had me mystified in this one respect: Would you agree that in F1, it is the chassis name that comes before the engine? Such as with "McLaren-Honda"? Well, in the 1960s I always recalled the Brabham F1 racers being branded as "Repco-Brabham." The engine name before the chassis name was unique, indeed!
There is plenty of info to be found online about the Repco engined powered Brabhams in the 1960s.
Climax engines were interesting, as they were there at the start of the F1 mid-engine (or some would say "rear-engine") revolution in F1 racing in the late 1950s with Cooper; and powered the Lotus team up through the 1965 season.
The FIA going to the 3-liter formula in 1966 put the engine maker out-of-the-running; as by some accounts, Coventry-Climax gave up being a F1 engine supplier.
Mercedes' dominance in the turbo-hybrid era is just astounding. They became only the second engine manufacturer after Ferrari to breach the 200 win mark despite not having competed in F1 far less often than Ferrari.
It's fascinating seeing it like this. I knew Cosworth did some great things but I had no idea they practically dominated the 70s and early 80s!
They were supplying every team…
@@miks564 Yeah and that just goes to show how good they were the fact every team wanted the cosworth engine.
@@justamanchimp The Cosworth DFV is the greatest racing engine ever built, it's amazing that it was competitive from the late 1960's through to the early 1980's
And the turbocharged & alcohol fueled version of that engine, the DFX, dominated the North American Indy Car series from the late 1970s to the late 1980s.
Nice work
Cosworth's 174th win was the 1994 European Grand Prix. They've won two races since...
As a person who is not a petrolhead/gearhead, after watching this video, I now understand the significance of the movie: Ford vs Ferrari. Also, I'm quite surprised Mercedez only started seeing consistent success in the late 90s...
They only really started seeing success in the 90s as they had left F1 in the mid-50s due to the 1955 Le Mans disaster. A Mercedes car launched into a crowd of spectators, and out of shame the company dropped motor racing entirely for about 40 years or so! So that makes it even more impressive, personally, that they came back from such a long hiatus, and still had a front-running engine/car the whole way.
Not really, the engines names was Cosworth not Ford its like name Ferrari as Fiat.
Cosworth is british, Ford american
You really don't. First of all that Ford. vs. Ferrari movie is some of the most ridiculous American propaganda ever, and paints an entirely wrong picture, which in reality was that Ferrari didn't care about something that Ford cared a lot about and managed to beat Ferrari in it. Inferiority complex by Ford.
Second, Ford had nothing to do with F1. These engines were designed, engineered and built by Cosworth in the UK. Ford was just one of the biggest financers, they had nothing to do with the development. 100% UK made engines.
@Kody Moodley . . . Some have contended that Enzo Ferrari's passion for sports cars, with devoting the racing efforts to the sports cars endurance series and to the Can Am series, may have set back the F1 efforts in the late 1960s into the '70s.
@@derbigpr500 Myself an old-timer, I followed the racing scene in the years that the Ford vs Ferrari movie covered, and it bothered me with the amount of liberties (or "dramatic license") and omissions that was done in that movie; and this is from an American perspective.
I'm ur 500th subscriber!
I feel good for you.you are blowing up
Thanks for the support. Maybe it is not blowing, one video went up in views now it is going down with views, but I will try to improve on content to get the views back up :)
@@MKF1_official you are getting very good views
Crazy how 103 of 212 race wins by a Mercedes engine are Lewis Hamilton.
U mean by sore loser Hamilton 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😅😅😅😅💯💯💯💯
Not exactly he had wins before going to Mercedes
@@trevorsenft2876 Must be a Red Bull fan...
@@mahattahamovich3983 He means the power unit wins. Lewis has never raced for a manufacturer that does not use Mercedes engines. He entered the sport with McLaren-Mercedes, then moved to the Mercedes-AMG team. Both used Mercedes engines. So all 103 of his wins were brought to him with Mercedes power.
@@JustSomeGuyWithNoMaidens Or a Ferrari fan.....
Renault engine
💯💯🔥🔥🔥🔥
Ford Overtook Ferrari with the 1972 Italian GP and Ferrari equaled them by the 2004 US GP nice lttle coincidence we got there
Honda need to come back and get to 100 race wins
Great video.
I didn't realize that the Lotus-Ford partnership at the Indy 500 predated Lotus-Ford in F1 by a full four years, but the real mindfuck was figuring out that Brabham didn't yet have BMW engines in 1981. I always assumed the split graphic on the nose was a BMW thing, but I guess it's something BMW adopted later on. I love the BMW livery whether it's on a Brabham, a Sauber, or the 2000 Williams.
The first Indy 500 for Lotus in 1963 used a bona-fide Ford production engine block in that race; a pushrod engine valve design at that.
i find it funny how the climax did exactly what it said on he tin
This video should be 2x faster so we can make it 4x faster with youtube playback speed
It's Juan Manuel Fangio and Giuseppe Farina
never heard Ford and Formula 1 in the same context
Considering how long Ferrari is around, they are actually doing pretty bad in this chart lol
I was surprised by Renault tho, never knew that a Renault driven car won that much.
And the Mercedes man, phew, that domincance was something else.
2022 season, i'm ready!
Its not Renault car, is Renault engines
For those who dont know, Merc engines are built in the UK as are the cars. Money from Germany thats all
Shout-out to Toyota, Lamborghini, Yamaha, Life and Subaru for never making a race winning engine.
Peugeot too. Toyota nearly won in Malaysia 2009
the engine is only 1/3 the battle... You need the car itself and the driver as the other 2/3... I'm sure toyota made great engines but bad cars and no amazing talent... mostly new drivers and old talent washed up..
@@SirRobbins I just said they nerly won in Malaysia 2009 (a rain race) and if you watch or rewatch the race, it is just fact. I don't judge their cars or the talent of the drivers
@@arnaudmilome7740 I was replying to the OP, not you. You're right they nearly did win one race but I feel Toyota made a competitive engine, just not a competitive car
It would be nice if the names of the 'current' engine manufacturers were highlighted somehow at each point in time
Ford/Cosworth comeback soon?
Would like to see it
Theyll come back if F1 gets rid of the hybrid engines an go back to raw gasoline
- The parody leading up to the 70's was CRAZY
- 70's Ford Era (Cosworth Engine was just too nutty)
- 80's Parody (Honda, Renault, Porsche Tag, Renault, with the occasional Ferrari win, & BMW making cameos)
- 90's 1st Renault Domination (Honda still a winner, Mercedes returning and winning, Ford in it's dying years but still winning races, Ferrari not really up to snuff until later in the decade)
- 00's Ferrari domination (Mercedes & Renault still winners later on & BMW, Honda, & Ford Cameos while Toyota couldn't reach the brass ring)
- 10's 2nd Renault Domination followed by Mercedes Domination (Honda coming back from scratch while Ferrari fails to win anything more than just races)
- 20's Too soon to tell. Mercedes & Honda deadlocked through the 2nd year but time will tell after 2020 Mercedes domination (Ferrari & Renault lacking big time so far)
Petite question sur les probables victoire de red bull cette année, seront t-il attribué à red bull ou à Honda ?
Small question on the probable victory of red bull this year, will it be attributed to red bull or to Honda?
Cette année ce sera sûrement RB sachant qu'Honda se retire.
Nonobstant il est vrai que le moteur est développé par Honda pour 2022 donc on ne sais pas trop.
Je pense à Red Bull eux-mêmes puisque le moteur devrait porter leur nom, à moins qu'il ne s'occupe que de "rebadger" le moteur Honda avec une collaboration plus étroite
Actually in some of the 70’s Ferrari’s engines were supplied by fiat, it was a flat 12 engine
Suprised me how many renault have
One of the things this video is wrong is counting Mugen-Honda as Honda. Despite preparing Honda engines, they were not badged as official Honda. You can check this here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formula_One_engines#Most_wins_in_a_season
*reads in Jeremy Clarkson anorak voice*
The funny part about the Ford numbers is all of those wins came from either the DFV or a derivative of it.
Fantastic!
Damn, 2016 was really a year for Mercedes
Cool video, pitty Honda left...they looked like they could have added more wins for themselves moving forward.
We need Cosworth back now more than ever!
cosworth backed out after deeming the hybrid units to complex and costly to design and construct... It was a sad day to see cosworth go. They ran the last V10s in F1 in 2006 when everyone else went to V8s.
Remember Toyota was also a part of F1 yet they didn't win a single race. Weslake at least achieved this.
How about Le Mans 24h and Nissan VK45 engine
Only Toro Rosso´s Seb is winner with a Ferrari engine without a Scuderia Ferrari's Team
The only ferrari win in 2008 apparently
What would be interesting is the ratio to years in F1 and number of wins.
And race starts.
More than f1 years and wins is f1 starts because back in the days it was 7 race every year or even less now we ha more than 20
Michael schumacher last ford-cosworth engine champions
Respect ...
FORD all the way....
Dominant back then.
Golden times.
COSWORTH, not Ford. Ford had nothing to do with it. It's a British company with British engineers and engines made and designed there. Keep your nationalism away from F1.
@@derbigpr500 hahahah.....
European crap.
Ford all the way.
America rules.🇺🇸🗽🦅⚡⚡
Oh please can we see Climax back on the grid in 2022.... Oh shit, when I started typing that they had 2 wins, Now its 39.
Seems they were more than an innuendo.
Maybe do one with most wins for each team
Ferrari would be at top again because all there manufacturer wins are for Ferrari
@@victor4331 I know, but it would be interesting to see other teams throughout the history
@@victor4331 all but one.
Still I'd watch a video on the most wins by team
Honda. Aryton Senna won 21/22 races with McLean Honda mp4/4.
The most dominant car in F1 ever
@@rodrozil6544 15/16 races
Average Dominant Engine Fan vs Average Weslake Enjoyer
How’s it all time F1 didn’t start in the 50s
Yes it did? Grand Prix racing dates back earlier, F1 started in 1950
All the forgotten teams. Or some that have won, but still ended up on the downlow.
Putting a Ford badge on Cosworth engine is really unfair and makes it seem like Ford had something to do with F1, which is false. Cosworth was a British company (and still is) completely and entirely unrelated to Ford road cars.
Ford supplied the money to build it.
Monza 2008, First and Last win for a Ferrari engine without Scuderia Ferrari.
Basically it was DFV vs various versions of 312 in the 70s
putting vettel on the thumbnail,, smart😂❤
This is not correct. You forgot Mario Illen.
Ah! Yes! Illmor engines badged as Mercedes.
I believe Honda return to Formula 1 championship and take its 100th win.
No, it's pointless for Honda now. The have proven that can be top in F1.
Before 2014 Mercedes engine had 99 victories.
After rules change, engine reach 113 victories.
How to destroy the most beautiful sport in the world
so it's their fault they were better than everyone at adapting, I'm just saying if this domination happend with ferrari your small brain wouldn't say the same thing
@@raduchiriac6342 when it happened with Ferrari, FIA and Formula 1 did everything to stop it.
And they did in 2005.
So shut up kid
@@antonelloboccardi991 And the FIA & F1 did many things to try and stop the Merc dominance. But they only proved to be the best team at adapting to new regulations. The cream rises to the top!!
@@antonelloboccardi991 Ferrari was pretty darn good 2006-2019. Renault had Benetton and Williams in the 1990's. Mercedes and Ferrari started breaking up that domination in 1997
..BMW in 2001 with 14 wins with Ralf, Juan Pablo and Robert.
@@antonelloboccardi991 bernie ha detto non troppo tempo fa che quando era in possesso della f1 fece il possibile per far vincere vettel e la ferrari in generale. Inoltre la fia ha cercato di annullare il vantaggio della mercedes principalmente nel 2017 e 2021 (riuscendo finalmente a far creare agli altri una macchina migliore della loro)
Nel 2006 la fia rese illegale il mass damper a metà stagione, dopo averlo giudicato legale all'inizio, e questo penalizzò sopratutto la renault (1 in campionato con alonso). Dopo questo, la ferrari era la miglior macchina
Quando la Ferrari dominava nei primi 2000 pensi che lo sport fosse più bello? O lo dici solo perché ti da fastidio che fin'ora la mercedes sia stata il miglior team per anni?
Meglio quando la fia veniva chiamata ferrari international assistance...
Do you imagine ford- Cosworth comeback for 2026...
All of Offenhauser's wins were when the Indianapolis 500 was apart of the world championship