2000-2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / GMC Yukon NHTSA Moderate Overlap Crash Test (37.5 Mph)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
- A series of Injury Risk Assessment tests performed to analyze the risk of injuries between 50th Percentile Male and 5th Percentile Female occupants.
Performed on 11/29/2001, this test assesses the THOR-Lx dummy in a 40% Moderate Overlap frontal crash test. Both Driver and Passenger are 50th Percentile Male Hybrid III dummies with THOR-LX legs. The speed was 60.35 Km/h (37.5 Mph).
Occupant Readings:
Driver - Passenger
HIC 373 - 282
Chest G's 46 - 36
Chest Disp (mm) 21 - 24
Femur Loads (N - L/R) 6303/4254 - 4066/1313
Damn that was a clean ass tahoe too
These are probably 20 years old vids so it was new
Barn doors 😭
@@jadenbright3854 *I agree the video quality is really showing the date of that time “ish”*
It says in the description performed 11/29/2001
A friend of mine had a Silverado around this vintage, head on crash with a Durango at 45-50mph both drivers walked away without even a scratch. Crash tests are not the end all be all. The real world is.
You don’t get the point the crash tests are done to show what can happen to the cars in an accident while it’s not likely that you’ll get injured the possibility is higher for that vehicle due to the A pillar buckling
It matters how much overlap there was. If they cars were fully overlapping he would most likely be ok, if it was partially overlapping it would have seriously injured both of the lower legs.
@@sureynix very well could be. All I can tell you is the results I saw first hand on the street, which is as real as it gets.
Looks real world crash to me 🤷♂️
@@fastingpinoy546 a real world situation reduces the size of the average vehicle you would run into. the odds of running into something as big, are there, but smaller than the odds of running into something much smaller. These trucks get in wrecks on the road, and we witness it. they handle wrecks well simply due to their size. If two full sized SUVs smash into eachother at speed, idc what brand the SUV is, the people are gonna be hurt without a Mirical. Id even say the durango vs yukon the guy mentioned above was a Mirical situation
Thanks for this upload! I was always wondering how these huge SUV's would perform in standard crash tests.
And it was just a moderate overlap test - what would happen in a small overlap 😣
Small overlap test would be devastating. I have a 2004 yukon but it's not my daily driver anymore.
@@robertforce888 glad you sold it
Check this out if you want
th-cam.com/video/noor55yGWHc/w-d-xo.html
@@AndreiAndrei-rt4po but that was probably going like 60 or 70 mph. And if he was ejected he wasn’t wearing his seatbelt. That guy seem liked he was trying to kill himself. Which he did
And this was 37.5 mph. Not 40 😮
Oh my legs! 😭
This would probably earn a Marginal like the Silverado it was based on. That being said, in the real world it's more likely that these will hit something smaller.
August 13, 2020 5:57 pm
In the real world you're not running into a stack of hardened steel block bolted to the floor
@@my95buick That stack of hardened steel block bolted to the floor simulates a car of the same weight as the one tested.
@@josema6694they need to do car on car testing. A steel block simulates nothing in the real world
Why this man add the date and time 😂
th-cam.com/video/ye47TafDU1w/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=ClickOnDetroit%7CLocal4%7CWDIV
A crash between a Cruze and Yukon. Damage seems similar.
I’d say maybe just maybe an acceptable rating. Minor injures to the neck and head due to hitting the B pillar. And possible injures to the knees and legs. To be honest you’d survive this but you won’t just straight up walk it off.
Never mind probably a marginal
@@texas2884 maybe poor
Check this out
th-cam.com/video/noor55yGWHc/w-d-xo.html
I got bored so I slammed my Tahoe into a concrete wall (I was getting a new bumper as it was a project and the wall needed to come down, took the srs fuse out obviously) and I slammed into it, chipped the wall good and the bumper didn't even have a dent.
I got so board watching this video I slammed my suburban into a wall
I got rear ended by an Audi and not even a scratch on the paint.
Only difference of the 2003-2006 is just a new steering wheel
And all the bottons are different my dad has a 02 and I have a 05 feels a lot smother and easier to drive
the 2003-2006 are pretty different mechanically compared to the 2000-2002 chevy tahoes
Yes with new included Bose sound systems, double din radio relocated on star antenna, complety diffrent interior wiring, gauge cluster is different two tone interior is different a lot of small things were changed
NCgames orange also chime and gauges
I have a 2004. I especially purchased due to it having a stronger chassis
rip legs
This vehicle is definitely safe
No
Check this out
th-cam.com/video/noor55yGWHc/w-d-xo.html
@@AndreiAndrei-rt4po it does alot better than the modern SUV'S
@@AndreiAndrei-rt4po
The driver of that Tahoe didn’t have his seatbelt on and that was a head on collision on a highway.
If you happen to find an overlap crash test for the 2007-2014 Tahoe I would be forever grateful. I own one. Curious to see how it does.
th-cam.com/video/fqqobhX1pq0/w-d-xo.html
@@fatimadnoor7563 not this
th-cam.com/video/PNZ9S7IArTw/w-d-xo.html
Not a Tahoe but still sits on the same frame.
Super good!!! It will be totaled if you get in a accident any worse than a fender bender, but it is very safe and absorbs all the energy
If this test is any indication, the Tahoe will typically perform about as well as the Silverado it's based on. The 2007-2013 Silverado earned a Good rating, so the 2007-2014 Tahoe will probably perform similarly.
June 18, 2023 12:38 am
Damm, clean but its a shame. I am sure glad haven't crashed mine.. mines a 2002 model like that one. Broke my heart to see such damage lol
Pictures: 2020 quality
Video: 1980s quality
Actual 1980's quality: better than this
video looks like it was shot with high-speed film. Never good looking quality but that's the trade off for high speed.
Tests today don’t seem to show as many angles
Rather concerning to the roof beginning to buckle above the driver. Especially considering that it hit a stationary object at only about 40 mph...
What version of the tahoe have a brown two tone
Probably earlier ones. It might have been an option for the 2000 model year. It was option package ZY2 on Silverado. You can easily do this two tone yourself. The color is sunset gold.
Thx
11/29/01
How much for one rear door?
This test was done 20 years ago and the vehicle is long gone.
@@CarPro1993 I was kidding lol but still cool
Wow, the Ford did a lot better in this test.
The Ford was going 7mph slower which can make a big difference.
@@AntonEMaes That's an important detail.
is this test actualy from 2001 like the description sa
Yes it is.
اين انتم يا عرب🇸🇦
موجودين
موجودين 🫡
Steering wheel in your chest literally
I had a 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe battalion chief suv at the suburban Chicago fire department I served at for 35 years it was in regular service from 2000-18 a show and back up rig 2018-20 when destroyed in George Floyd protests and riots
Watch this and then watch all 2020 pickup trucks crash which would I rather have I actually have a 2003 Yukon
Lmao no. Did you notice the dummy lost his legs? And the A pillar folded up so fast?
@@benjammin8510 it's plastic doesn't replicate an actual leg
@@benjammin8510 did you also notice that on the new ones the engines almost come into the cab
@@dakotazellers839 no they don’t quit making things up
I was in a moderate overlap crash at about this speed on my way to school with my mom one time. She was not wearing her seatbelt and the airbags did not deploy. Niether of us were injured though the front of the vehicle looked about like this car by the time we came to a stop. The truck we hit was pretty analogous, and it of course was almost unscathed.
I think it would get a good rating in iihs
?
the silverado with the same chassis got a marginal from iihs
Whats the rating tho ?
The Silverado, which this is based on got a marginal
@@myname6390 and that means what?
If it hit a sedan the sedan will loose.
Like the Town and Country vans (voyager in Europe) it has a 1 star ranking here but destroy a 5 star car..
My 1997 explorer destroy a BMW 1
My 2015 Chrysler TC destroy a BMW 1
My 2007 Chrysler TC destroy a Volvo XC60
My Chrysler Sebring survived a wild boar with a scratch and blood through the whole front end.
And every car is very bad in a crash test.
I work as a car body mechanic in germany, i see lot of accident cars…
Depends on the sedan and what you define as losing.
The land cruiser and nissan patrol in 1998 are way better than this
I think tahoe safe car, before see this test.
The type is too old, most cars show same safety at that time. Also, i think this car is too heavy which impact the crash test.
This is still safer than the 2001 ford F-150. I also saw a pattern with all 1998-2003 cars, they all care about the tyres more than the actual driver
If you hit Something smaller, the other one will Look Like the hoe.
I had a Explorer 97 and a New bmw 1 hit me rear end.
I was driving home ... 🤪
Not safe at all check this out
th-cam.com/video/noor55yGWHc/w-d-xo.html
Never would have guessed that is so unsafe GM truly makes some of the worst vehicles on the road
I’ve seen worse than this and it’s not gm
About half the vehicles on the road are within this era lol. Open your eyes...
Why would you not guess it? Its an old vehichle. They don't do well.
@@thatguy_jose modified food starch
@@slapshotjack9806 RED 40
The thing is these are simulating a crash with a barrier that has the weight of a damn semi so this is worst case scenario in reality
The forces in the test are similar to those that would result from a frontal offset crash between two vehicles of the same weight, each going just under 37 mph.