China Deploys a Massive Double-Carrier Battle Group With New Fighter Jets

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 418

  • @leonwangls
    @leonwangls หลายเดือนก่อน +353

    Freedom of navigation is not exclusive to the American

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      I actually genuinely agree with you.

    • @Joshua-dt5vi
      @Joshua-dt5vi หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      When did they ever say that?

    • @gumpyoldbugger6944
      @gumpyoldbugger6944 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      @@Joshua-dt5vi I don't think they have, at least not out right.....but they certainly do get their collective knickers in a royal twist when either the PLAN or Russian conduct exercises in international water close to their territories......they call it a "provocation" when a nation they see as adversarial does it, but claim they (the US) are only exercising to their right to freedom of navigation when they do it.

    • @Joshua-dt5vi
      @Joshua-dt5vi หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @gumpyoldbugger6944 The only time Russia or China ever sail near the US is when they go to Alaska, and if my memory serves me right, all I ever recall the US saying is that they are monitoring the vessels, which is the complete opposite of what China does when the US sails in the South China sea or Taiwan strait.

    • @gumpyoldbugger6944
      @gumpyoldbugger6944 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@Joshua-dt5vi They also said it was a provocation

  • @tonywei423
    @tonywei423 หลายเดือนก่อน +188

    Wait for the Fujian carrier.

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      I actually genuinely agree with you

    • @300guy
      @300guy หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes, wait...wait......wait......still waiting 😅😂🤣

    • @johnsmith1953x
      @johnsmith1953x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RadicalFloat_95 Stop spamming the comment section radical.

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@johnsmith1953x 1h ago why?

    • @chrisdoulou8149
      @chrisdoulou8149 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@300guyThe induction of the Fujian is moving along nicely. No one is expecting it in service before 2025, and then another couple of years before it’s fully operational.
      It’s a first of class with a bunch of novel technologies, some that don’t exist in even US warships. The Chinese are very cautious till they have a design working perfectly, and then they go into mass production at a rate that scares everyone.

  • @GoriusBungo
    @GoriusBungo หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    In this fleet
    3 destroyer type 055
    5 destroyer type 052D
    1 frigate type 054A
    2 fast combat support ship type 901.

    • @hermesliteratus882
      @hermesliteratus882 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      And there could be nuclear subs underneath.

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​And don't forget about AWACS. @@hermesliteratus882

    • @bearpolo3618
      @bearpolo3618 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@hermesliteratus882 There must be 2.

    • @佯谬
      @佯谬 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bearpolo3618 可能更多

    • @tyc9302
      @tyc9302 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And undisclosed number and model of submarines.

  • @grid-panda
    @grid-panda หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    I have to say that the J-15 fighter jet with PLAN's light-colored paint looks really good.

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I actually genuinely agree with you.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      That's stealth coating.

    • @qiyuxuan9437
      @qiyuxuan9437 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Those with new paint are J15B or J15T, which is the catapult variant made for the future carriers, and they also has new radar and weapons used on the J16, a massive upgrade over the old J15 which has gray paint.

    • @LoveFreedom-p1n
      @LoveFreedom-p1n หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      中国隐身舰载机J-35比J-15更好看

  • @harrythehandyman
    @harrythehandyman หลายเดือนก่อน +106

    To respectfully clarify: China has not been the one changing the status quo.
    Whoever is moving towards declaring the independence of Taiwan is breaking the status quo.
    No able country would tolerate the secession of its territory.
    The status quo is mainly based on:
    1. 1943 Cairo Declaration and 1945 Potsdam Declaration, which Japan accepted as they unconditionally surrendered. (Japan shall be stripped of all the islands in the Pacific which she has seized or occupied since the beginning of the first World War in 1914, and its sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku.)
    2. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (Restoration of the lawful rights of the People's Republic of China in the United Nations. It recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations")
    3. China-US Three Joint Communiqués (1972, 1979, 1982, US President Jimmy Carter in TV broadcast to the entire world, that the United States recognized that the government of the People's Republic of China was the sole legal government of China, and acknowledged the PRC's position that Taiwan is part of China. )
    4. 1992 Consensus (See following).
    For whom would like to play with wording, I quote President Jimmy Carter in Three Joint Communiqués "We do not undertake this important step for transient tactical or expedient reasons. In recognizing the People's Republic of China, that it is the single Government of China, we are recognizing simple reality. But far more is involved in this decision than just the recognition of a fact."
    This is the foundation of China-US relationship and President Carter has no intention to play ambiguous wording here in the full context of the Three Joint Communiqués.
    Now some more facts on The status quo.
    1. Taiwan is not the name of a country. It is the name of a island or a province. The Republic of China (ROC) is the acting governing body of Taiwan province.
    2. In the current constitution of ROC, it states both mainland China including Mongolia and Taiwan province are the territory of ROC.
    3. Mainland China is governed by the People's Republic of China (PRC), while Taiwan province is governed by ROC.
    4. Two governing bodies are still in civil war since 1945 and have never signed a peace treaty nor an armistice. The current condition is in a ceasefire.
    5. What do most countries do with civil wars? Take the United States as an example. When the Confederate States seceded from the United States, the Union states didn't tolerate such action and waged a four year civil war which resulted in 620,000 deaths of soldiers not including civilians.
    What did The Union government do to counter The British and French support for the Confederate States?
    a) diplomacy: The Union government dispatched diplomats to Europe to explain the cause of the war and to argue that secession was unconstitutional. The Union also attempted to persuade European nations that supporting the Confederacy would lead to a long and bloody war that would destabilize the entire continent.
    b) Naval blockade of the Confederate ports.
    c) Economic policy: The Union government encouraged domestic manufacturing to reduce reliance on British and French goods. The Union government also placed high tariffs on imported goods.
    6. There are many ways for a country to end civil wars. PRC and ROC's semiofficial representatives had agreed on the 1992 Consensus which formed an basis of the dialogue between two, until recent years that ROC's (Taiwan) position has changed and deviating further away from the 1992 Consensus in both words and actions in the past 10 years. PRC (mainland) has made many attempts to invite the ROC representative back to the conversation on the basis of the 1992 Consensus but to no avail. With the growing possibility of Taiwan's permanent secession from the mainland, the PRC (mainland) took several different approaches and more firm actions and is still open to peaceful resolution based on "One China policy".
    7. The United Nation and the vast majority of the countries (more than 200) in the world including the US only recognize the PRC as the sole legal government of China and established diplomatic relationships. There is only about five countries (depending on when) has diplomatic relation with ROC(Taiwan). However, in recent years, the actions of the US government (like arms sell to Taiwan) and its politicians have deviated further away from the three joint communicates between the US and the P.R.China.

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes but actually no and actually get a life for once you racist hater and sorry l actually couldn't hear you cause your actually that irrelevant and actually stop promoting misinformation and nobody actually asked for your opinion keyboard warrior and that's actually ironic coming from you and how much did the fbi and cia pay you for that?

    • @红领巾-i2q
      @红领巾-i2q หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      吃评论的吗

    • @红领巾-i2q
      @红领巾-i2q หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      言论自由吗

    • @未央笑笑生
      @未央笑笑生 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Anyone who doesn't think Taiwan is part of China, go to Taiwan and buy an official map published by themself, the territory they claim includes not only the entire Chinese mainland, but also Mongolia. Then look at their constitution, they claim that they are the legitimate government representing China. You tell me Taiwan is not part of China?

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @未央笑笑生 l actually agree with you and finally some one who l found in the comment section that actually has a functioning brain for once.

  • @cheungchingtong
    @cheungchingtong หลายเดือนก่อน +133

    First an ICBM to Pacific, then this, it is almost like China be saying: "It seems everyone got a temper these day, I think you guys need to calm down a little bit". lol.
    Also, dear ENI, will you cover the Zhuhai Aviation Show few days to come?

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I actually genuinely agree with you and you actually couldn't have said that actually any better than me and out of all the languages that you chose to speak you chose to speak facts and this world and community actually genuinely needs more people actually like you in this world.

    • @normanfung7124
      @normanfung7124 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      You should count the number of military bases on foreign soil. Then you know who should "calm down" (actually, piss off)

    • @jemler3speak
      @jemler3speak หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can't blame the empire for imperial expansion and chauvinism aggression, but those countries (except sk, japan, germany who willingly become colony of the u.s.) who subjugate themselves to station foreign military bases are miserable without a reason, among them there are few cronies who mocks China not being "free"? How dare they criticise a true sovereign country with it's mind set straight and have MAD ability to counter the u.s., while they allow foreign power have troops and bases on their soil? ​@@normanfung7124

    • @老子就是中国人
      @老子就是中国人 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@normanfung7124你应该看看中国有多少盟国

    • @Wvavy
      @Wvavy หลายเดือนก่อน

      China is weak and poor

  • @ylmake
    @ylmake หลายเดือนก่อน +122

    I hope the United States can look at the Taiwan issue calmly. China does not want to go to war with the United States over the Taiwan issue. The Taiwan issue is China's internal affairs. China will not allow Taiwan to be independent or maintain the status quo forever. China will definitely unify Taiwan. I hope it will be a peaceful unification of Taiwan rather than a military unification of Taiwan. If the United States insists on intervening in the Taiwan issue, the Taiwan Strait will inevitably lead to a war, and China can do anything for Taiwan. This is the core issue of our country and we will never allow foreign interference. I hope American politicians can be more clear-headed! China does not want to go to war with the United States. China only wants to unify Taiwan!

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I actually genuinely agree with you and you actually couldn't have said that actually any better than me and out of all the languages that you chose to speak you chose to speak facts and this world and community actually genuinely needs more people actually like you.

    • @flowingfiber7115
      @flowingfiber7115 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But does taiwan want to unify with China? Because it certainly doesn't seem like it.

    • @rod9829
      @rod9829 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I hope the CCP can look at the Taiwan issue calmly. The US does not want to go to war with China. The US only wants Taiwanese self determination!

    • @路人-zi
      @路人-zi หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      ​@@rod9829印第安人才需要这个

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@rod9829
      Yes, 3rd-brotha is a superpower since 2020 and has working HSR since 2013.
      Caste-system numba-1.
      Mumbai-Dharavi numba-1.

  • @JinJiaLat-vl1oj
    @JinJiaLat-vl1oj หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    LKY : The unification of China is inevitable. A matter of time. And time is on China's side.

  • @jonasezekiel3829
    @jonasezekiel3829 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Beautiful aircrafts.

  • @calrajos
    @calrajos หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    China has all this before the US will sit down and reason with you peacefully🤣🤣🤣

    • @YUINTER
      @YUINTER หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      手里没剑和有剑不用是两码事

  • @Hystericall
    @Hystericall หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    lol, that "keep breaking down" was savage!!

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I actually genuinely agree with you and out of all the languages that he could have said he choose to speak facts.

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i never expect word salad from this channel

    • @helium269c2
      @helium269c2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@RadicalFloat_95 As good as the QE carriers are with its stealth airwing, a chain is as strong as it's weakest link, and if the carrier cannot move / breaking down / under maintenance and it cant perform its primary operation, its pretty useless. Like a submarine that cant submerge

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @helium269c2 l actually agree with you and you actually couldn't have said that actually any better than me lol.

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@RadicalFloat_95
      Yes, Mumbai-Dharavi numba-1.
      Caste-system numba-1.

  • @markmcgrew9012
    @markmcgrew9012 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    Nice marine architecture….🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳China

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I actually genuinely agree with you and you actually couldn't have said that actually any better than me lol and this world actually genuinely needs more people actually like you.

    • @Wvavy
      @Wvavy หลายเดือนก่อน

      China is weak and poor 😂

    • @红领巾-i2q
      @红领巾-i2q หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @BITStudioCode
    @BITStudioCode หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    China: building 055 at an astonishing pace. US: retiring ticonderogas at an astonishing rate while slacking on the production of burke III's and the constellation.

    • @Americaisgreat12
      @Americaisgreat12 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The only way we can compete with China production of ships is to star building new docks and expand the existing ones

  • @Ahmat_Sila
    @Ahmat_Sila หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Mao needed this maritime power back then to bring Ta1wan back home🎉

    • @rod9829
      @rod9829 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He was too busy killing sparrows

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@rod9829that actually has nothing to do with the south China sea

    • @ChuckNorrizzed
      @ChuckNorrizzed หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don’t need to, USA will discard them soon

    • @jackwang1238
      @jackwang1238 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@rod9829不,是在朝鲜半岛射大海雕,还在缅甸剿匪。😂

    • @YUINTER
      @YUINTER หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@rod9829 尔曹身与名俱灭,不废江河万古流。

  • @taimoor167
    @taimoor167 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Very nice informative video.

  • @robertseaborne5758
    @robertseaborne5758 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Thank you very much for this inspiring information, the world needs this PLAN for the protection of Socialism with Chinese (and Taoist) characteristics. By the way, your accent is just fine as is your analysis and reporting.

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you!

    • @YUINTER
      @YUINTER หลายเดือนก่อน

      无量天尊

  • @Ricardo-lb4so
    @Ricardo-lb4so หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    When will the PLA carrier Fujian initiate naval drills with a task force??

    • @RichardsMiscCorner
      @RichardsMiscCorner หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      sometime next year, takes at least a year +++ to complete the trials to a super carrier, and this is China's first one.

  • @JinJiaLat-vl1oj
    @JinJiaLat-vl1oj หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    LKY : No American intervention. Taiwan is a core issue of China and a peripheral issue of the US.

  • @Vhvjdow0ajsbcdhcuei3o22-om4sm
    @Vhvjdow0ajsbcdhcuei3o22-om4sm หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    In other news the su-57 will be shown at the zhuhai airshow!

    • @BjTomY
      @BjTomY หลายเดือนก่อน

      su57 already showed up zhuhai China

  • @davidk6269
    @davidk6269 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    China's first double-carrier battle group? It gives new meaning to 双喜。 ; )

  • @People-Republic-of-America
    @People-Republic-of-America หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    Love from People republic of America ❤

    • @binghan4587
      @binghan4587 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      有点搞笑,哈哈

    • @EL8888
      @EL8888 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@binghan4587 美利坚人民共和国 😍

    • @jackwang1238
      @jackwang1238 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      美利坚联盟国赞同你的做法😅

    • @DavidGamersChannel
      @DavidGamersChannel หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Your flag is so humorous

    • @DaddyBear205
      @DaddyBear205 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well done sir!

  • @nomercynodragonforyou9688
    @nomercynodragonforyou9688 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Awesome photo op and scene to clip

  • @horridohobbies
    @horridohobbies หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Sure, the J-15 is not a state-of-the-art stealth fighter, but it's still a good-looking aircraft, just like I admire the F-15 Eagle and F-14 Tomcat.

    • @kimpark283
      @kimpark283 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It never was a stealth fighter. The j31 is, and made for carriers

    • @Souffle083
      @Souffle083 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      J-35 has already released, it will be next gen fighter of the carriers.

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat หลายเดือนก่อน

      The J15 is based on the Sukhoi Russian jets which outperform the F15. The F14 was a beast though. Funny - only Iran still flies them

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Souffle083 Need both. Stealth fighter can't carry as many weapons

    • @石昊-y2l
      @石昊-y2l หลายเดือนก่อน

      So how do you appreciate J35 today

  • @jamesmandahl444
    @jamesmandahl444 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Bro there is nothing wrong with the j15. Especially the new variants. The new j15 breeds are better in every matric. We are obviously updating the f18e and ea18 to try and create parity. Don't casually downplay China's military kit. It is constantly improving from all I am reading.
    BTW awesome content keep it up.

  • @BoLa-uv5oy
    @BoLa-uv5oy หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Exact quote of LKY.
    The unification of China is inevitable. A matter of time. And time is on China's side. No American intervention. Taiwan is a core issue of China and a peripheral issue of the US.

  • @samad3251
    @samad3251 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    SEAD is very important, this is an area where China seriously lags behind (at least by 27 years) USA. US has (since early 1990s) has invested and trained heavily in SEAD and has plethora of weapons/missiles to suppress enemy's air defence.

    • @taibro3868
      @taibro3868 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And what exactly are those? Why would you think China is behind?

    • @arthaswade7741
      @arthaswade7741 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please keep this in mind, and I hope American politicians think the same way.

    • @RichardsMiscCorner
      @RichardsMiscCorner หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      yes, they only have the YJ-91 as an anti-radiation missile. but to be fair, America goes on the offensive 100% of the time - so they need SEAD in great numbers. China would be in most cases, defending their territory against the US and wouldn't need it nearly as much. Against Taiwan, a combination of drones, and missiles including rocket artillery would take out whatever defences Taiwan could muster. Just like Iron Dome can be overwelmed.

  • @multipolarworldorder
    @multipolarworldorder หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Long live modern China

  • @hoekoktong9099
    @hoekoktong9099 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Pride of being Chinese , great china progress and soon relegated to strongest nation - economically militarily technologically 👏👍🇨🇳

    • @Wvavy
      @Wvavy หลายเดือนก่อน

      Literally will never catch up to America. China is weak and poor 😂

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Wvavyyes but actually no and actually get a life you racist hater and sorry l actually couldn't hear you cause your actually that irrelevant and actually stop promoting misinformation and nobody actually asked for your opinion keyboard warrior and that's actually ironic coming from you.

  • @cabasadefogo9533
    @cabasadefogo9533 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Ouch that dig at the mighty British navy 🤣😝😂

    • @029laowei
      @029laowei หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Little UK

  • @SabeloMthethwa-h4x
    @SabeloMthethwa-h4x หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can you please do a video on the capabilities of each missiles of the PLA rocket force and onother on the PLA's combat and surveillance drones.

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I actually genuinely agree with you.

    • @gumpyoldbugger6944
      @gumpyoldbugger6944 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@RadicalFloat_95 can't you say something else for f**k sake, you are getting annoying.

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@RadicalFloat_95
      🏳️1962🏳️1962🏳️

  • @billhsu6349
    @billhsu6349 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Hello there."

  • @xiaozhong5198
    @xiaozhong5198 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    i.m Chinese. I can prove that is a CG. we don't have aircraft and the airjet is a bunch of junks.

    • @虚晃一招跳出圈外
      @虚晃一招跳出圈外 หลายเดือนก่อน

      宫廷玉液酒😂

    • @DDxxxxxl
      @DDxxxxxl หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We got the best CG teams on this👌🏻

  • @CurtisAdams-cs2pr
    @CurtisAdams-cs2pr หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The usa has 1 carrier in service the others are being repaired...

  • @AY2121-i4y
    @AY2121-i4y หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    When the USA says freedom of navigation. They actually mean containing the sea ways. US navy can't even stop the Houthis, how can they contain China in its own backyard 😂😂😂

    • @Lucas-o6b3v
      @Lucas-o6b3v หลายเดือนก่อน

      The United States is only pretending to fight the Houthis. It does not want to really expose its advanced technology. When the need arises, it will strike with a decisive blow.

  • @tonysia6474
    @tonysia6474 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    China PLA Navy 🇨🇳♥️♥️♥️

  • @xklymr4395
    @xklymr4395 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    it's time to change, USA.

  • @uzumakipongzei6853
    @uzumakipongzei6853 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can you make a video on China soldiers military gears

  • @pohmoh3590
    @pohmoh3590 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    UK carriers are without full air wings and escort ships 😅
    Endia new carrier has No air wing. Still waiting for final bid results likely rafale -M aircraft 😂

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      3rd-brotha waiting for enough 🚽🚽🚽

    • @stevencher9968
      @stevencher9968 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Even if indian carrier has air wing, they can't take off or land because the carrier has kowtowing motion 😅

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stevencher9968 yeah, that new carrier is made of k urry, it shake all the time on sea, but its no surprise, product of endya( 100% foreign parts ,but wrongly assembled by hindus)

    • @noriakikakyoin6557
      @noriakikakyoin6557 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      hopefully they decide actually get HAL tejas HAHAHAH😅

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I actually genuinely agree with you and you actually couldn't have said that actually any better than me lol ❤😂🎉.

  • @alexchan5454
    @alexchan5454 หลายเดือนก่อน

    keep going and be stronger.

  • @DorJinTan
    @DorJinTan หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tri-carrier ops. Yes, Yes and Yes!

  • @Tomahawk3090
    @Tomahawk3090 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I don't think we're gonna get GTA 6 anytime soon

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wrong video comment section.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@RadicalFloat_95
      No comment section is wrong for GTA 6 😂

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​@@ajaykumarsingh702go watch cocomelon kid.

  • @ChuckNorrizzed
    @ChuckNorrizzed หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Is this navy fleet capable of hitting San Diego?

    • @zhezeng651
      @zhezeng651 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, but DF are

    • @noriakikakyoin6557
      @noriakikakyoin6557 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      nope, but china has icbms that can easily reach u.s. and nukes to destroy the world, the same goes with u.s and russia

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@noriakikakyoin6557l actually agree with you.

    • @OutlawPingu
      @OutlawPingu 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      What make you 'think' that China aircraft carrier want to hit San Diego.?

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @OutlawPingu I actually agree

  • @soonlooitan71
    @soonlooitan71 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    America have many grandpa carrier 😂

  • @thchong1376
    @thchong1376 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Carrier group is obsolete nowadays. It is to threaten lesser countries though.

  • @mssv19123
    @mssv19123 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Dual nuclear aircraft carriers currently being built as well....by 2030, China will have 5 aircraft carriers

    • @300guy
      @300guy หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And still almost ZERO experience, they can build over 100 like the US did in WW2. Problem being, with no experience, no one with the experience willing to catch them up, however many the build will just add to the stack of floating paper weights.

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@300guyLol no country today has that experience by your logic

    • @haochengzhai7156
      @haochengzhai7156 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @300guy China's shipbuilding capacity is 100 times stronger than that of the United States during World War II.

    • @neudaiz
      @neudaiz หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@haochengzhai7156 no country in the world has ever matched US ship building in WWII

    • @osb1945
      @osb1945 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@neudaiz The US of ww2 has been surpassed a long time ago

  • @leecheong4986
    @leecheong4986 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    They have satellite photos fourth and fifth aircraft carrier. One is the size of Fujian and the other is bigger still. True?

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, those are LHDs (075s & new 076)

    • @Bai420-h2k
      @Bai420-h2k หลายเดือนก่อน

      Two aircraft carriers in '26

  • @LuobingSong
    @LuobingSong หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    what is the next generation of naval aviation?
    Is the ford class next generation of carrier?
    China now do have the best ship building capability of the world, the real answer is not carrier Fujian, also not Ford class.
    for China now can easily build a 250000 tons carrier, simply add more than 7 launch trails on one single ship, and launch 3x32 planes alone with medium sized AEW like KJ-500 based on Y-9 in 30 minutes
    now the question is how to recovery the planes, there are two different ways of doing this, the first way is recover the planes on different ships, for example recover planes on 076 class, but it can not be the best way
    what if 2 or 3 recover runway on single ship, and how to install these things on one single ship, that can be a question
    but it will come

  • @WildBillCox13
    @WildBillCox13 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well, well . . . China is finally able to stage a publicity shot as convincing as those already published by her closest near peer- Great Britain. That's a great leap forward, I must admit.

    • @kimpark283
      @kimpark283 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Says Mr extra-white....

    • @RichardsMiscCorner
      @RichardsMiscCorner หลายเดือนก่อน

      UK can do a promo image like that - if they use copy / paste in photoshop

  • @Azathoth2980
    @Azathoth2980 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is a little present for election

  • @JeffChua-w7t
    @JeffChua-w7t หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    India is better by talking a lot. Nothing can be achieved.

  • @12nad22
    @12nad22 หลายเดือนก่อน

    这才开始呢

  • @keli4068
    @keli4068 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    these two carriers are just training ship,real carrier starts with 003

  • @asu6475
    @asu6475 หลายเดือนก่อน

    双航母编队还是太少,兄弟们快把烟点上。

  • @OrionsMako
    @OrionsMako หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Easy work

  • @AY2121-i4y
    @AY2121-i4y หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Instead of building air craft carrier they just need to build more 055 Destroyers.

    • @台独的老父亲
      @台独的老父亲 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      055会制造,航母也会继续制造,因为我们拥有世界上最强大最全面的制造业

  • @Sundayb-gj5vr
    @Sundayb-gj5vr หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I do support your video. Do you accept "Paypal"?

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Many thanks sir. I definitely can receive Paypal - please send to the account under the email address navalreviewer@gmail.com

  • @TheGriffithHuyan
    @TheGriffithHuyan หลายเดือนก่อน

    China in recent months diddddddddddddddddd aloooooooooooooot of miltitary showoff, everyone knows why they choose this time to show what they can!

  • @musa7010
    @musa7010 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You are very late on this

  • @BenderRodríguez-p3e
    @BenderRodríguez-p3e หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    First Comment Baby!!

  • @kalmurphy5254
    @kalmurphy5254 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Don't worry China is no pushover and Russia will help defend Iran and their is nothing the United states and NATO countries can do about it China has weapons that the world has never seen.

    • @YUINTER
      @YUINTER หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Chairman Mao said: It is the people, not one or two new weapons, that decide the outcome of a war.

    • @georgesikimeti2184
      @georgesikimeti2184 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What weapons,the only weapon that I’ve not seen is the one without “bullet”…!

    • @kimpark283
      @kimpark283 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@YUINTERcowardly,racist,worthless ,inept Americunt soldiers with left handed sausage fingers and right handed butter fingers. Asses got kicked out of Korea, Vietnam and Afghanistan . Only inbred, bumbling morons enlist in Americunt military,as they know dat they're too retarded to get hired anywhere else

  • @ଳନଧସଧସଧଧଧଧରଳଧଞ
    @ଳନଧସଧସଧଧଧଧରଳଧଞ หลายเดือนก่อน

    military china 2025 one trillion dollars budget economy 🌐🇺🇳🇨🇳 1000 000 000 000$

  • @robertlyh3553
    @robertlyh3553 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    👍

  • @johnsmith1953x
    @johnsmith1953x หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    *IS there a reason why the two carriers are RIGHT OUT FRONT?!*
    Is it for show? I would assume they each would have a sacrificial destroyer or frigate in front of each?

    • @elmouto3883
      @elmouto3883 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Photo op

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@elmouto3883yes but actually no.

  • @owbvbsteve
    @owbvbsteve หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Or maybe the other navies have been a carrier counties for decades?
    It could also be that it taken you 6 years to get two carriers ready at one time.
    Dual carrier operations only takes two carriers. China really only has two carriers and a training ship.
    It does sound like the carrier battle group is exactly like a US battle group with less missiles and less aircraft.
    Two Chinese carriers = 1 Ford and has a lower sortie rate

    • @noriakikakyoin6557
      @noriakikakyoin6557 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      but 055 has more VLS than burke though

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@noriakikakyoin6557l actually agree with you.

  • @shengzhong2662
    @shengzhong2662 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    印度:天下英雄唯……

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      3rd-brotha 😂🤣😂🤣

    • @bobbychang2223
      @bobbychang2223 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@taiwanstillisntacountry bureau of zhanhu?

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@bobbychang2223
      Scam-centers Mumbai-Dharavi 5-rupy-rupy little-D-boi?

  • @300guy
    @300guy หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ​@台独的老父亲 什么,这有问题吗?

  • @chinadragon7713
    @chinadragon7713 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Americans better watch out the Dragon is rising

    • @kimpark283
      @kimpark283 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The americunts have been afraid to attack since Korean war ended. China's carriers aren't for them-- its missiles are

  • @ta8986
    @ta8986 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Haha, anyone can create computer graphics. China going broke and unable to develop such a task force!

  • @thehumus8688
    @thehumus8688 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So, its like IJN Kidō Butai - where carrier operated as pairs (akagi-kaga, shoukaku-zuikaku etc)
    those lewd ship waifu version would populate the internet, soon I suppose

    • @rave.201
      @rave.201 หลายเดือนก่อน

      dual-CV TF was a thing if their single carrier werent brought enough wings to the fight. hence, why Nimitz class or Ford-Class always at ease doing it solo + their escort

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@rave.201l actually agree with you.

  • @RichChin-cz9ui
    @RichChin-cz9ui หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sounds foolish, when he critizes other navies... speed over substence. That's realism over choreographing.

    • @RichChin-cz9ui
      @RichChin-cz9ui หลายเดือนก่อน

      pardon the spelling

  • @tonysu8860
    @tonysu8860 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't think you'll ever see the USN engage in dual carrier formations except in training exercises eith other countries to share knowledge and expertise. Dual carrier formations by navies like the PLAN are likely a recognition their single carriers are inadequate against expected adversaries even with the upgraded aircraft.
    The aircraft probably aren't too much if a concern, the indigenous engines mostly the WS-10 won't likely last more than a week if heavy operations and would need to be replaced. Aircraft flown by all the Western allies should be able to fly months before requiring heavy maintenance that might require replacement.
    Or, maybe China's carrier will be sunk within hours so endurance is not a concern.

    • @theinfralink6598
      @theinfralink6598 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸

    • @rave.201
      @rave.201 หลายเดือนก่อน

      well, seems like u didnt saw the news few once back. guess what CVN join the Reagan in west pacific

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I actually genuinely agree with you. ​@@rave.201

  • @BenderRodríguez-p3e
    @BenderRodríguez-p3e หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    FIRST

    • @gimme88
      @gimme88 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      well done ☕

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@gimme88l actually agree

  • @MarvinChenFantasy
    @MarvinChenFantasy หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Light carrier will not compare to a serious carrier.

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      they do, because gears they have on board are like 60 years advanced than those US carriers built in 60s 70s 80s

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​@@xinyiquan666l actually agree with you and you actually couldn't have said that actually any better than me and out of all the languages that you chose to speak you chose to speak facts.

  • @LanzEsnid
    @LanzEsnid หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait for the US 7th Fleet😊

    • @eason-d8y
      @eason-d8y หลายเดือนก่อน

      wake up.

    • @OutlawPingu
      @OutlawPingu 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      For what.?

  • @WysteriaGuitar
    @WysteriaGuitar หลายเดือนก่อน

    No one does carrier ops better than the US Navy...

    • @LuobingSong
      @LuobingSong หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i think IJN were better
      at least before 1943

    • @WysteriaGuitar
      @WysteriaGuitar หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LuobingSong Yeah, not since 45'

    • @kimpark283
      @kimpark283 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Due to evacuating cowardly americunt soldiers from all the wars dat they lost

    • @OutlawPingu
      @OutlawPingu 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The carrier well operated , aircraft can take off and secure landing on the flat top.
      That is more than enough. As for air superiority it's not the aircraft , it's the pilot.!!

  • @donaldlee8249
    @donaldlee8249 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Two carriers have combined air wing numbers similar to one Nimitz class, roughly 70-80, and lack awcs

    • @tc691kiing9
      @tc691kiing9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Each pair of wings following by 5 aerial fighters…

    • @mjabb02
      @mjabb02 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There are helicopters based aewacs on each carrier

    • @donaldlee8249
      @donaldlee8249 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mjabb02 cannot compare

    • @Iamabot4708
      @Iamabot4708 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They have helicopter based awacs

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​@@donaldlee8249still AWACS that can track you from thousands of miles away from the deck and remain invisible on your radar.

  • @JonTan-z3e
    @JonTan-z3e หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i mean lets not go as far as to claim china prefers substance over speed alright....

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I actually would.

    • @JonTan-z3e
      @JonTan-z3e หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@RadicalFloat_95 iv spend my whole life as a chinese surrounded by chinese and i know the only thing chinese prefers over anything else is money, anything else is just an unfortunate byproduct or a coincidence or happenstance.

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JonTan-z3e fake Chinese.

  • @jonathanbaincosmologyvideo3868
    @jonathanbaincosmologyvideo3868 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Put a ski-jump on both carriers?
    double lol

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Meanwhile India and uK:lm l actually a joke now?

  • @LanzEsnid
    @LanzEsnid หลายเดือนก่อน

    All Made in China is low Quality including the Covid 19😅

    • @eason-d8y
      @eason-d8y หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're an unevolved boar, stinking ass. You eat shit three times a day. Get your head soaked in shit every day!!!!!

    • @eason-d8y
      @eason-d8y หลายเดือนก่อน

      No money, no one loves you, you are a poor man!!!

    • @eason-d8y
      @eason-d8y หลายเดือนก่อน

      You poor little frog, you've had a rough life, haven't you? Eat junk food every day? The well you live in is very cold, or how can it make your heart so dark, and there is no money to travel around the world to see? Just typing away in the well every day. Oh, my God. You have to go up! Jump out of the well and see the outside world.!!

    • @OutlawPingu
      @OutlawPingu 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Too low until US banned Huawei hand phones.!!
      Just a hand phones and the US already scare shit out of it and pissed in the pants.

  • @seungwooham3204
    @seungwooham3204 หลายเดือนก่อน

    cute kkkk

    • @OrionsMako
      @OrionsMako หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Isn't it 😂

    • @seungwooham3204
      @seungwooham3204 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@OrionsMako so cute kkk

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​I actually genuinely agree with you❤😂🎉 ​@@OrionsMako

  • @PretendMe
    @PretendMe หลายเดือนก่อน

    tiu ley ah China

  • @vincentrivera743
    @vincentrivera743 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The 2 carrier task force of Chinese navy looks impressive sailing in calm waters. But the Pacific ocean can be brutal at times and with strong waves is able to sink large ships, carriers included.
    It may be a prudent decision to showcase the power of the mighty Chinese carrier group near a Chinese pier rather than sail the winds of an angry Pacific ocean during monsoon season. The sea is a taskmaster impossible to please.

    • @tgsgardenmaintenance4627
      @tgsgardenmaintenance4627 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The Chinese have been sailing the seas for a few thousand years, I think they know what it's like!😂

    • @coolsoenie
      @coolsoenie หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@tgsgardenmaintenance4627yes and no
      Yes they do sail lots of time at the sea
      No because sailing with a double carrier group is different than sailing with a group of fregat.

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@coolsoenieno but actually yes and actually get a life for once you racist hater and sorry l actually couldn't hear you cause your actually that irrelevant and actually stop promoting misinformation and nobody actually asked for your opinion keyboard warrior and that's actually ironic coming from you.

    • @tgsgardenmaintenance4627
      @tgsgardenmaintenance4627 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @coolsoenie . I meant with regards to how rough the Pacific could be. Pretty sure they've known that longer than we have!

  • @msb3235
    @msb3235 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm so worried, please US get your shit together and bring back your super powers glory of the 90s!

    • @MianguangHan
      @MianguangHan หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You mean to stink sky high 😂

    • @OutlawPingu
      @OutlawPingu 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You should worried why US carriers keep on poking their nose in the Asia region.

  • @imjoekang
    @imjoekang หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    CCP propaganda channel

  • @tyc9302
    @tyc9302 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good content, awful accent.

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually racist.

    • @tyc9302
      @tyc9302 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ This is nothing to do with race. If you think this is an opportunity to communicate with English speaking audiences, there are so many Chinese who can speak clear normal good English, why have someone who has such a strange obscure accent to read the text. It is all about communication, communication and communication !

    • @RadicalFloat_95
      @RadicalFloat_95 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@tyc9302 yes but actually no and actually get a life for once you racist hater and sorry l actually couldn't hear you cause your actually that irrelevant and actually stop promoting misinformation and nobody actually asked for your opinion keyboard warrior and that's actually ironic coming from you.

  • @maxchi1176
    @maxchi1176 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Navigation freedom always barking by u.s and his small brother in south china sea.. Now PLA and Russia navy can reach off shore of america West cost😂😂😂😂