Why this is the only IWC I Love

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 286

  • @WatchCrunchOfficial
    @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Join the conversation at WatchCrunch: www.watchcrunch.com/Max/posts/what-s-your-favorite-military-watch-1074

    • @RT-jf9pp
      @RT-jf9pp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can't find this model(even on Ebay), even if you have money. SMITHS MILITARY PRS-29AM (white dial)

    • @michaeljordan6008
      @michaeljordan6008 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sell it and get the IWC.
      Life is too short.

  • @pierremartin9048
    @pierremartin9048 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I bought a very similar 40mm blue dial Le Petit Prince version on their most excellent bracelet. It’s in my opinion an outstanding watch. Absolutely one of my favorites and a keeper no doubt.

  • @carlhaluss
    @carlhaluss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thanks so much for the heartfelt, informative review. Although I recently got the Mark XVIII Heritage, I feel my decision might have been a bit too hasty. I was on the fence about the Spitfire because of the lume at only 3, 6, 9 and 12 positions. I knew, of course, it is not a cost-cutting measure, but there must be a good explanation for it. Now, after your explanation, I actually applaud IWC for sticking with the original lume positions of the radium lume on the Mark XI. Not a choice to be taken lightly. It risks a loss of sales due to guys who do want a better lume coverage. Like me, before I learned the reason! I did try the Spitfire before I got the Mark XVIII Heritage. I was surprised at the difference 1mm could make. I realized the lugs are much thicker on the Mark XVIII, which accounts for much of the larger wrist presence. And I do like the more sparse use of the faux patina on the Sptifire. I may well consider selling my Mark XVIII and getting the Spitfire. Thanks again for the great review!

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah that lil detail really sold me on the spitfire 👍. Glad I can help clarify

  • @evh4611
    @evh4611 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Got the black dial IWC Mark XX last saturday. I am very impressed and i love it. It's a keeper. It sits nicely in my collection next to my Omega's Tudor's Rolex's and Grand Seiko. Terrific watch

  • @degenerateWA
    @degenerateWA 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I had a co-worker rocking an IWC Aquatimer. Never heard of them before and when he handed it to me it almost took me off balance at how immediately apparent the superb quality was. A great option for people who are "in-the-know" on great, less popular, watches.

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Seriously dude, it oozes quality, even in this well worn example👍

    • @bdegrds
      @bdegrds 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Ummm IWC are very popular, have been for decades. They have been making watches for 154 years. They sponsor a formula one team. There is a world beyond instagram, just because you haven't heard of them doesn't mean it's not extremely well known. It's actually ranked 9th most recognized watch brand in the world.

    • @degenerateWA
      @degenerateWA 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@bdegrds so what you're saying is that it's less popular than 8 other watch brands?

    • @ThePianoTester
      @ThePianoTester 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@degenerateWA out of more than 300 watch brands, 9th is extremely famous actually

    • @degenerateWA
      @degenerateWA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ThePianoTester IWC is a great brand. There is no denying that. IWC is a less popular watch brand. There is also no denying that. Not really a debate on how much less; it is simply a fact that it is indeed less. IMO a pointless debate that the above commenter wanted to bring up

  • @Teslaus
    @Teslaus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I've owned the spitfire bronze chrono. Was a great piece and the decision was either this one or the chrono. They're both excellent field watches for sure!

  • @typebflieger
    @typebflieger 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I can’t stop thinking about the Spitfire since trying it on at an AD. This is the only 39mm case I know of in the IWC pilot lineup and sits in the sweet spot between 36mm and 40mm, the standard sizes of their smaller pilots.
    I’ve discussed this watch with other watch fans and I’ve heard complaints about the fauxtina, long lugs, the non-color-matched-3oclock date window, the “boring design,” and the premium over Stowa or Sinn not being worth it. After handling the watch, all of those concerns are answered, but the retail price is $700-$1,000 too high, IMO.
    I hope people give this watch a chance and stop getting hung up on parts like the date window. You’re right that it adds visual weight that would be lost if it were color matched. This is just another example of how this watch as a whole is greater than the sum of it’s parts.

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Very well said my guy! I pulled the trigger because I got it used at a good price and it really surprised me as you said, all the niggles went away when I had it in hand 👌

    • @zachscheel3784
      @zachscheel3784 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I purchased new from an AD that was
      Going out of business, $3350 out the door almost two years ago. In love with it and it’s a strap monster
      Idk what about it but it’s a piece you will get attached to and make memories with. I’d say it is a slow burn, like a 36mm explorer may be

    • @typebflieger
      @typebflieger 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zachscheel3784 That’s a great deal! I’m glad to hear you say how it grows on you because this watch is most likely in my future. Definitely much more easy to appreciate in-person than in photos or videos, and that has been a common trait among all of my favorite watches. Anyway, I’m glad you enjoy it and hope you make many more great memories with it!

  • @danlanders9219
    @danlanders9219 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I picked the 40MM Montblanc 1858 Automatic in Blue with Navy Blue Compass bezel featuring lume on the dial and the bezel. Comes with an amazing navy/black leather band from their leather source in Italy. Nice watch. I am enjoying it.

  • @ToolwatchBoutique
    @ToolwatchBoutique 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Stunning watch. I have the classic white dial Mark XVIII.
    My next one will be the 41mm Chronograph of the Spitfire lineup 👍

  • @matgorelsp
    @matgorelsp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good review I've had my IWC spitfire 326803 for nearly a year. I still look at mine and it blows me away congrats on you're IWC.

  • @gentlmentlmn
    @gentlmentlmn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great review! I really enjoyed hearing about the aspects of dial design that make this a keeper watch for you. I've tried this watch on many times and agree it is close to perfect. I'm less a fan of the faux patina however so I've so far held off on pulling the trigger (though I get your point that it adds colour to the dial). I can't wait to see what new watches IWC has in store this year - in-house 39 mm Mark 19 perhaps??

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm with you, until I saw the picture of the mark 11 and realized it's not just a design thing. Can't wait to see what iwc is coming up next👍

  • @marcgirard7551
    @marcgirard7551 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great review here, Max! You showed me something in this video that I could never seem to quite put my finger on... I have always wondered why I preferred the IWC type A flieger design to anything from Laco or Stowa and could never figure it out. Now with this video, you helped understand the subtle tweaks and magic IWC worked with the asthetics and symmetry of this watch to make it different and just better balanced and less sparse. This helps me justify in my mind why I would want the IWC over the Germans and have a real explanation.

  • @jabrz
    @jabrz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    really like this piece, so nice .

  • @wheelsandwatches
    @wheelsandwatches 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Absolutely love my mkXVIII le petit prince. Glad you like the spitfire.

  • @llcharl1e
    @llcharl1e 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    My favorite sub 40 iwc pilot military watch. I can't justify it though because i already have the most under-rated field watch, the Tudor Heritage Ranger.

  • @_Peter_.
    @_Peter_. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love the design of the IWC Aviation Watches and this 39mm model was on my list for some time, but I am glad that I didn’t bought one. I found a 1940s Omega 2292 HS8 watch in decent enough condition in the city I live in and bought it immediately… The Omega 2292 is definitely my favorite pilots watch!
    Thanks for the great content!

  • @JamesBond-nf1iv
    @JamesBond-nf1iv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have already owned it for over 2 years! I really love the military watch, and the 39mm size just perfect for my not big wrist!
    Thank you for your informative review!

  • @dimdon
    @dimdon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cute dial and a blogegr,
    I bought Rolex only before.
    Being a spifire owner for 1 year.
    IWC is my first choose for daily .

  • @richevans85
    @richevans85 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice watch and great review. It would be nice if you could include the model number, and link to strap, of the watches you review.

  • @Fab5Hill33
    @Fab5Hill33 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I was pleasantly surprised when I tried this on at an AD 2 years ago. I love the legibility and historical significant of Flieger's (especially from an original manufacturer), and the Spitfire has both PLUS an elegance to it that a Laco doesn't. However, my hesitation was the price. There seems to be a good amount you're paying for the IWC name. Maybe if I found one on the second hand market like you did...

    • @typebflieger
      @typebflieger 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree. It’s an amazing watch, and does surprise and delight in-person, but there is definitely an IWC premium. Ballpark, $3,750 (BB58 money) is the most I’d pay.

    • @user-do8ef4np7q
      @user-do8ef4np7q 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@typebflieger iwc is not even in the same ball park ad tudor....

  • @zHumanfactor
    @zHumanfactor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Happy New Year Max. Thanks for showcasing this Spitfire. I really never paid too much attention to IWC because of the size. I thought one had to be the Tom Brady size to pull these off. So I was surprised to see this at 39mm. I'm now interested. Cheers.

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Happy New Year! Glad I can share my experience discovering a new brand I love 👌😁

  • @dstevens1527
    @dstevens1527 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    would love to see this IWC spitfire without a date-window at 3... then I will buy this in a blink !

  • @stuartniven2401
    @stuartniven2401 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I own the big pilot and it is by far the highlight of my collection! Great video, thank you!

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Stuart! IWC is impressive in the metal 👍

  • @edjustice7755
    @edjustice7755 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    From afar have always liked the IWC Pilot, in particular this smaller variant, but go big or go home as they say. The Big Pilot, esp the Top Gun Ceramic has always been on my list. What's that a review I hear? hahaha! Happy 2022 All!

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah I'm working up to the big pilot dude 😎. I feel it's in my future

  • @complicatedtime
    @complicatedtime 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You know that IWC has 6 different Watch lines, and Pilots is only one of those lines, right? Some would argue that the “Portuguese Line” is what they are most recognized for. Don’t get me wrong, just as easily, the Pilot line is likely their biggest seller - but don’t sell this brand short.

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah but all their watches are big 😉. The Spitfire is the line that looks best for my dainty wrist

  • @johnjew2883
    @johnjew2883 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic review. I will get one. I already have 3 IWC Pilots. The 39mm spitfire is on my list.. I went to a recent watch convention here is San Francisco where i live and there ia German company, Laco which makes the original German pilot watches. I tried on the 55mm Type A and B watches. Amazing. How about doing a review on Laco? Thanks.

  • @dCotnijoeb
    @dCotnijoeb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Original big pilot for German military was 55mm. 46mm is the modern take on big pilot. I don’t think the watches IWC provided to the British were ever that massive haha

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ahhh that makes sense, IWC really played both sides 😉

  • @StuartHollingsead
    @StuartHollingsead ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah, it is fantastic, but I am not a pilot.
    For me, I wanted a watch with the 24 hour on the dial. So at first I looked into GMT watches.
    But then I found a nice watch by Hamilton that ticked all the boxes for me.
    Find what you like. Not what others like.

  • @user-cm3wd5hk1p
    @user-cm3wd5hk1p 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Still have this one?
    I’m seriously looking at the Mark XX. I go back and forth o. The black and green dial but for me I think the only green watch that sings to me is the Rolex Sub

  • @finesse49
    @finesse49 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It looks like a nice watch but at 20x the price would I get 20x the pleasure of wearing my Miyota powered Korean flieger? I doubt it. An enjoyable review, though.

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep, I know the one, I've had it as well 😉. Hard to beat the price

  • @almeladze
    @almeladze 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Max make sure your wife (future wife) doesn't hear that you have a habit of moving on after the honey moon period ;) LOL On a more serious note I prefer the looks of that Laco to this IWC. to me it is more complete.

  • @paulojpcarvalho74
    @paulojpcarvalho74 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love this video, Max! IWC is one of my favorite brands and I think it is very underrated by the watch community.
    Please, make a video about Cartier Santos. My favorite is Santos 100 2878 (mid size) for small wrists.

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good call! I have a friend with a Santos, I'll look into it👌

  • @rmwgroup3465
    @rmwgroup3465 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I thoroughly enjoy your videos so much such that each time you introduced your pieces, I am so hyped to go out and buy them! In fact, I already got two of the models you introed! Very dangerous LOL😅😅

  • @jeanlefranc3817
    @jeanlefranc3817 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Certainly a nice watch, but I still think a Sinn556a, with that subtle date window, is a strong contender in the Flieger/Daily driver game.

    • @typebflieger
      @typebflieger 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have a beloved 556i and it’s the watch I’d have to part with if I ever moved on to the Spitfire. It’s a tough fight between the two, despite the clear difference in price.

  • @VinodKumar-nn7go
    @VinodKumar-nn7go 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Max, nice video! have you ever tried IWC Mark XV? .Personally for me, the hands introduced after Mark15 was not appealing that much. I would not say bad or anything negative, but I found the Mark XI 's and Mark XII 's charm still embedded in Mark XV. I got one from Crown and Caliber in a good condition. It is almost 19-20 years old, but looks great and has become a beater/keeper for me..I was seeking an Explorer 36 for long , but I guess my search has ended here. Cheers !!

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes those hands are definitely more accurate historically! I've yet to see one in person, I hope to soon👍

  • @titojoyo
    @titojoyo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is that the spitfire original straps or not? Could you please give us information about the straps...

  • @JasonTheWatchGuy
    @JasonTheWatchGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone else find it really ironic that IWC, a watch company that produced pieces for the luftwaffe in ww2 now have a watch named after the spitfires that fought them? Just me?

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha, they made watches for both sides 😉. Benefit of swiss neutrality

  • @kjeldpedersen666
    @kjeldpedersen666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m the owner of a Mark XV from 2000. A bit smaller at 38mm and with stick hands which are more true to the original Dirty Dozen watches. I kind of like the sword hands but that’s more of a German (Luftwaffe) thing in my opinion. Then again, IWC provided both sides in WW2 as far as I know...
    It has become my everyday watch - a true keeper for sure. I recognize everything you mention about the subtle details growing on you, a watch you just come to appreciate more and more. It’s under the radar but reveals it’s true quality through your ownership.
    The only watch I would consider switching it for is the IWC Mark XII, the direct successor to the legendary Mark XI but with a date and - most of all - an automatic Jaeger Lecoultre movement.
    IWC’s pilot watches are truly stunning😊👍

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Totally agree, I learned so much researching this video and gained a world of respect for IWC as a brand 👍

  • @philamor5139
    @philamor5139 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    please do a watch collection video, we can tell you have very talented taste and it would be fun to see everything youv collected all together!

  • @douglaskrueger357
    @douglaskrueger357 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Never late than never … the truth is that the watch is a really slow burn but when it hits it hits perfectly.

  • @Lionel_pt
    @Lionel_pt 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey! Where did you get the strap? Is it an original IWC one? I love it! 😍

  • @yashara1e
    @yashara1e 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really nice watch but I don't understand why IWC always skimp on lume, cheap move.
    Use of Iron cage is also due to lack of rights for silicone hairsping

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I read that 😆. Was pretty disappointed on the lack of lume as well

    • @yashara1e
      @yashara1e 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WatchCrunchOfficial haha, still stand by it

  • @sanhxhebsbbb1048
    @sanhxhebsbbb1048 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love all watches by iwc there just perfect wow

  • @michaelriera6277
    @michaelriera6277 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Happy 2022! It is the kind of watch that needs to be held and lived with for a bit in order to appreciate.

  • @bensmiling
    @bensmiling 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve had mine for about 8 months. Love it. My every day go-to. I have a family link to spitfires and it just works in every way.

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Love how thin it is, gotta find a mark bracelet for it👌

  • @bensmiling
    @bensmiling 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve had mine for about 8 months. Love it. My every day go-to. I have a family link to spitfires and it just works in every way.

  • @paulsteele6120
    @paulsteele6120 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think IWC is being a bit cute as I have a 2005 Mk XV derivative called in the IWC catalogue as a Spitfire with an IWC number i.e. IW3253-II Pilot's Watch Mark XV Spitfire Stainless Steel. Mind you I bought mine New,Old stock from Farren-Price in Adelaide in 2014 and it needed fair amount of new parts to bring it up to chronometer standard. Everybody notices it as it has a quite presence on my wrist. Enjoy your watch they tell a tale, always.

  • @norman102745
    @norman102745 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still am having a love affair with my Mark XII which I have had since new.

  • @Valera_Scotland
    @Valera_Scotland 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Saving for the Spitfire. Hope you still love yours

  • @charleshermetix3886
    @charleshermetix3886 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I simply adore the bracelet on the new pilots series, and am growingly enamored w pilots watches' layout. Here's the thing...ive come to the realization that what I'm looking for is Rolex or Seiko style raised numerals BUUUUUT w an outline of steel or gold around the numerals (explorer, Glasshutte seaQ,etc) which is why I've landed on the new Longines Zulu as my current grail for this purpose. Hopefully my next watch, it just ticks aaaaalllll them boxes for me. Also I think IWC could totally knock it out of the park revamping the Ingeneur,adding another datejust or aqua terra alternative😊

    • @michaeljordan6008
      @michaeljordan6008 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you get it without the 5 horizontal stars.

  • @ankitupadhyay4834
    @ankitupadhyay4834 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My favourite bremont alt 1b

  • @adbraham
    @adbraham 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I absolutely love everything about this watch, err . . . except the red “spitfire”. I love the red accent, it’s just the word “spitfire” on the dial face that I have an issue with. Not very “tool watch” is it? . It just smacks of the naff marketing used by companies like Bremont. You don’t see it on the face of the Spitfire Chronograph, so why here? I prefer the size; the font; the slightly more “inboard” placement of the numerals. In short I prefer everything over the mark XX, except that word! I know this is personal taste however. I can even overlook the fauxtina, but not that word. It just makes the mark XX look like the proper tool watch, unfortunately, because in every other respect the Spitfire is much, much better!

  • @andreagargioni8658
    @andreagargioni8658 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is that watch strap from IWC or? Is there a reference for it? Thanks!

  • @partybees8856
    @partybees8856 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My favorite detail on the Spitfire that I don't find on many watches is that the second and minute markers are the same length.

  • @hughming
    @hughming ปีที่แล้ว

    The date window is bad because it exists. Then the lume is a deal breaker.

  • @jpce9999
    @jpce9999 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the non-symmetrical and rough looking date window bothers me... things like are why I would rather spend my $5K-$10K on a Grand Seikos or a Santos

  • @edgarberges3679
    @edgarberges3679 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Howdy, I stumbled into your channel. Good review. I love pilot watches too. Try the Omega MK40, ref 3520.53.

  • @WilliamButtel
    @WilliamButtel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hmm
    I like this but the movement is ETA base
    If I’m paying luxury prices I expect an in house manufacture movement tbh
    This top gun version with a new movement sheeesh I’m in trouble

  • @sauravsen1705
    @sauravsen1705 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your reviews man! Really like this watch…but…is it just me or does the date wheel seem misplaced to the left by maybe 0.5mm? Not as bad as the Mark Xiii.

  • @eljayr4669
    @eljayr4669 ปีที่แล้ว

    Out of choice I would go for the MK XVIII. I recently bought the MK XX and as much as I liked the watch and wanted it as a keeper I returned it as it was so inaccurate.

  • @ruslee5996
    @ruslee5996 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want that strap from StrapCode but having hell of a time finding it and StrapCode is no help. Anyone know part number or another brand out there? Want a few colors

  • @cy4624
    @cy4624 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The movement is not true inhouse.
    It's a IWC finished version of a Valfluerier that Cartier, Panerai, Baume all claim is in-house.

  • @AlexCastignani
    @AlexCastignani 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi i'haven't see in person but the general design is quite similar as laco hamilton and many other military design watch. it lack in personality imho. nice video anyway!!

  • @DDWGG1
    @DDWGG1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just got the new Spitfire Chrono! IWC is doing some great things over there

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's a sexy watch dude, their design for the Spitfire line is on point!

  • @timetowatch_francois
    @timetowatch_francois 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for sharing! I LOVE IWC with its simplicity and great movement. However, I need to stack up the dineros $$ to get one and, too often, I have other "better" watches that need my attention, namely the Mühle-Glashütte MroMare Go 😍
    Hope you have continued success in 2022 🙂👍🏼

  • @TheFlyrodder68
    @TheFlyrodder68 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's nice but to be honest, I think I'll get bored with that watch soon enough as well. Enjoy the honeymoon. Thumbs up!

  • @juanjose_mx
    @juanjose_mx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s a gorgeous model. It reminds me a lot to the Hamilton Khaki field, although this is a pilot. Keep up the good work.

  • @Grwthwarrior
    @Grwthwarrior 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @watchcrunch Please reference the strap source!

  • @FilmScout
    @FilmScout 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what's the exact model?

  • @orangedan5424
    @orangedan5424 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice simple look👍 in Aviation I think only Breitling and IWC are best. Personally though I like the IWC chronograph... Simply because they have all the day and date complete. Breitling should learn a thing or two from IWC. Even with day and date, their chronograph watches design still look cool.

  • @inandouttv5365
    @inandouttv5365 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a great channel! You got a fellow watch geek subscribing from Vancouver, BC. Great production and presentation, very enjoyable. Interesting to know about this IWC, absolutely perfect looking pilot watch, thanks! I will never buy it new in my right mind though with this pricetag and losing too much value the minute you walk out of the AD, and the brand name is just incomparable to Rolex or Omega which sell in similar price ranges. Always surprised to meet IWC fans but to each their own, whatever makes you happy! Again, thanks and genuinely enjoyed the video, on to the next one. Keep up the good work!

  • @BrandonDean3
    @BrandonDean3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really enjoy your channel. I’m not trying to sound snooty - but a lot of watch videos annoy me. Yours are really well done. Cheers my man.

  • @galatians22122
    @galatians22122 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just picked up the bronze spitfire wow!

  • @BigBellyEd
    @BigBellyEd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing. But I much rather choose the Luftwaffe one. Laco or Stowa

  • @peterferenczy8073
    @peterferenczy8073 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Perfect comments! The watch is beautiful but Stowa was the pioneer

  • @기차비행기자동차
    @기차비행기자동차 ปีที่แล้ว

    아날로그 타이머처럼 거꾸로가는버전도 있었으면...
    약속시간까지 얼마나 남았는지도 알수있을텐데.
    d-day와 비슷한 d-time 기능의 시계

  • @aftarsun
    @aftarsun 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love military watches too and this is my fave! I’m glad to see you covering it

  • @ams914
    @ams914 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you like balance and symmetry, look at the BP 43.

  • @MGave
    @MGave ปีที่แล้ว

    Pls could you tell me where I can find this canvas strap?

  • @jackycheung6279
    @jackycheung6279 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just bought a IWC spitfire Bronze 39mm , I like it a lot ,especially the green dial.

  • @Ferien7
    @Ferien7 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Long, gappy lugs 😖

  • @AldoFelt
    @AldoFelt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    In my eyes even an Oris Pilot looks better. just my opinion.

  • @ericgrace9995
    @ericgrace9995 ปีที่แล้ว

    Despite being English and my natural affinity for its name, I chose to buy the Longines Spirit. This was in some measure down to the price - £1260 from an AD at an incredible discount. For me, when comparing specs and finish, I couldn't help but think of the Emperor's New Clothes when looking at the IWC.

  • @laidback-luc
    @laidback-luc ปีที่แล้ว

    Is your band also from IWC? Love the color.

  • @istudy9
    @istudy9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Longines spirit!!

  • @arjeneveraers
    @arjeneveraers 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    where can I buy the strap?

  • @Dondaddyh
    @Dondaddyh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Military..... Nope, nothing military for me.😂

  • @deanc7476
    @deanc7476 ปีที่แล้ว

    Max, thank you for making this video. It really helps folks like me who are still sitting on the fence. I think my watch buying journey has been leading me in similar directions to yours. I own two military heritage watches right now and am still interested in others. Now that you have owned Spitfire for a while what do you think of the long lug to lug and how it sits on your wrist. My wrist circumference is not much bigger than yours (at 7inches). Are there any other issues that have surfaced and stand out over the time you’ve become acquainted with the watch? I’m wondering if this model has been out long enough where a refresh by IWC might be imminent. Do you have any opinion on that latter point?

  • @riccardo1569
    @riccardo1569 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would never spend 5000€ for this watch. There’s plenty of similar options for a fraction of the price, and personally even better ones i.e. Longines Spirit.

    • @coffeeboyclips1973
      @coffeeboyclips1973 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Longines spirit is a good watch but the iwc is in a different league, iwc is up there with Rolex etc

  • @Rider2ingenieur
    @Rider2ingenieur 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My favorite iwc is fliegerchronograph , as well as the ingenieur model.

  • @stinkstank5177
    @stinkstank5177 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brother, you nailed this review! I couldn’t agree more with all your points concerning the layout of the Spitfire, it’s a stunner!

  • @watchwanted6580
    @watchwanted6580 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congrats my friend this is perfect watch for sure and my favorite IWC too. Really love all in this piece, just lugs too long I think, but on leather nato should be great too 👌 I tried on new green IWC chrono 41 and really was impressed how is cool watch, but spitfire still my favorite 👍😎

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks my dude! Your experience with watches is amazing to me, thanks for the suggestion, I'll have to check out the Chrono 👍. Happy New Year!

  • @chelious1973
    @chelious1973 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    They should put this on a bracelet. IWC makes the best in the business. The regular XVIII with the 30110 was supurb before they went with Selitta with the 35111. The 32110 is based off the 30110, actually use most of the same parts. The 32110 is also coming to the regular XVIII.

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes I found this out after the video! Will definitely investigate 😁👍

  • @The442nd
    @The442nd ปีที่แล้ว

    My all time favorite is the Mark XV with stainless steel bracelet.

  • @ronforman9821
    @ronforman9821 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The lugs are too long, I wouldn't be able to stop looking at the gap between the case and the strap. It might have been the angle of the camera but the date didn't seem to be in the middle of the window. Is this really worth 10x the price of a khaki?

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      In person, it is hard to explain but yes, it leaves Hamilton in the dust.

  • @ItsMiGGz11B
    @ItsMiGGz11B 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its a nice watch. But not worth the price in my opinion.

  • @absoluteb22
    @absoluteb22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just tried it on with the Nato and it surprised me how impressive it looks and feels on wrist.

  • @Chris-mm5gi
    @Chris-mm5gi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I absolutely love this watch. My only hang up is the 4500$ RRP, since they gets me other watches I keep coming back to, and 4300 will get a new root beer Tudor on a leather strap.

    • @coffeeboyclips1973
      @coffeeboyclips1973 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Iwc is seen as a more higher end brand than Tudor, Tudor is similar to Longines,

  • @chrisk1361
    @chrisk1361 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The size of the spitfire is basically perfect, I purchased the mark xviii which I love and has replaced lots of my other watches, so simple but I do wish it had the spitfire sizing. Great video!

    • @kaakie1
      @kaakie1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Would you chose the Mark 18 over the Spitfire again? I can not make a choise !

    • @coffeeboyclips1973
      @coffeeboyclips1973 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've got a mark 18,it felt a little big on my wrist at first but once I got used to it I found its the perfect size and watch.

    • @kaakie1
      @kaakie1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@coffeeboyclips1973 My wrist is 17 cm ( 6.69 inch) : Will it fit regarding the lug to lug? What is your wrist size?

    • @coffeeboyclips1973
      @coffeeboyclips1973 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kaakie1 my wrist is 6.5inches, yeah it will be fine on your wrist, best to try it on.

  • @chrisk1255
    @chrisk1255 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Santa brought me a Hamilton khaki pilot day date.
    Santa done good 😁😁
    (Santa also might be my wife...hard to tell)

    • @WatchCrunchOfficial
      @WatchCrunchOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha, it's been a big year for you Chris 👏👏😁