Assalamualaykum sister, Costa Rica looks soooo beautiful Ma Sha Allah. Allah's creation is amazing! Have you watched a guy a guy called Aanghel? Would be interesting to see what you think of his conversion story May Allah bless you and your family
MashaAllah wow i can watch tgis vedio over and over nevet get tired of the cleanliness and the trees I didnt know Costa Rica. Its hard to imagine you lived there and bren borrn there??.. its jusy like a vacation😍 place..
@@nabsnabster3488 We should love the beauty of our own wife and not look at other woman staring at them. Prophet Muhammad ﷺ once said, “No one who has an atom’s weight of pride in his heart will enter Paradise.” A man asked, “What if a person likes his clothes to look good and his shoes to look good?” The Prophet ﷺ replied, “Allah is beautiful and He loves beauty. Pride means denying the truth and looking down on people.” Be handsome, were good looking clothes and be a role model to others. Other than that it is completly out of the context the hadith you quoted. Furthermore you can enjoy the content without looking at the person the whole time enjoying beatuy. It's not only about being modest outside of the house, but also being modest infront of Al Baseer (The All-Seeing) without any person being near by. This is first and foremost a reminder to myself brothers. We all struggle, but that is the jihad al Akbar, which when won till the end of our life it will grant us al jannah with the most beautiful wifes. Be patient, be modest, fear Allah.
@@Btraain Firstly I didn't quote the hadith. 2) What are YOU doing watching the video then hypocrite, go watch your own wife's youtube video then xD 3) We judge If someone is beautiful or not automatically. So you've done it too in your head, lets be honest, and the thirsty nice guys just post comments saying "mashallah" lol, let them be. At least they are honest. While you on the other hand x_x
@@Btraain Even so the Matan (content/meaning) of the hadith can still apply. "A dirty mind thinks dirty". Listen m8, go work on yourself instead of trying to teach Muslims the abc's of Islam in the youtube comments. You don't have any moral or intellectual standing right now and anyone with a bit of sense can tell.
Raaa ur actually a breath of fresh air 😂 I can listen to you all day long with that Extra charisma your spurting all day . Much love from a fellow Muslim from the UK and good luck on your new journey to Islam . I can’t wait for your future videos , uv got a friend in me 💙 Costa rica seems hella dope btw.
Guava reminds me of my childhood. Used to climb the guava tree n sit on its big branch for hours after school eating guava as my lunch😂😂. ❤️ from indonesia.
Very peaceful. It's like time took a vacation in your village. Walking through your village reminded me so much of Bangladesh except your village looks so pictureseque.
Interest..... Salam by the way. The guavas in Costa Rica/South America in general look different (more pink, even for a ripe one) than the ones from Asia. I wonder if they taste the same or similar. Do you have jujube in your country
I have visited Costa Rica and most of Latin America, when ripe the taste is similar to the ones in Asia. Jujube prefers drier climate and is native to China and South Asia.
I'd love to know more about Islam in Costa Rica and in surrounding countries, along with current perceptions of the masses, and other Muslim revert workers who are making a difference to change the image :)
Assalam mualaikum. I am surprised. Your English is excellent. I have always thought Puerto Rican speak mainly Spanish. My apologies to all Puerto Ricans
Yariela Valverde 600 years before mohammed received revelation from "angel gabriel" in a cave, Angel Gabriel visited Mary (LUKE 1:35) and calls JESUS the SON of GOD, so why 600 years later does "gabriel" appear to mohammed saying, "allah has no son" this would mean there is a false message. In 2 CORINTHIANS 11:14 The bible says: marvel not for satan himself MASQUERADES himself as an angel of light. Could this be who visited Mohammad in the cave? To deceive people and to take JESUS off the cross? There is a hidden agenda to cover the truth, the founder of islam is not Mohammed, rather satan himself. JESUS CHRIST is the only way to heaven (John 14:6) only JESUS can pay the penalty for our sins, JESUS is the VISIBLE image of the invisible GOD, GOD manifested in the FLESH. (COLOSSIANS 1:15) (1TIMOTHY 3:16) (JOHN 1:1-14) (PHILIPPIANS 2:6-11). The bible says that if we confess that JESUS is LORD, and believe in our heart GOD raised him from the dead, we shall be SAVED (ROMANS 10:9) put your faith in JESUS CHRIST and be saved!!!! To reject JESUS CHRIST IS TO REJECT SALVATION. the Jesus from islam is a lie from Mohammed. JESUS IS MORE THAN A PROPHET. HE IS THE LORD. 👍👍👍👑👑♥️♥️♥️🎁🎁🎁✔✔✔
thank you for telling her but she is allowed to choose to believe what she does. sharing this just makes it seem like you're not respecting the right of free will that God gave her. I am happy you're in love with your religion but that's you're own belief and she has her own. God bless
But I have a duty to expose Islamic contradictions so let me explain. Sunnah as a Muslim is nothing but following the sayings, practices and life of Prophet Muhammad. Quran cannot be the only source for Sunnah so you must read Hadith to live life and practices of Prophet Muhammad. But Hadith is full of contradictions and with million absurdities and you will realize that Islam is a concocted religion and off course, Muslims are defendants not jury because they are blinded by their own desire to believe the absurd.. read below for an explanation: The early Muslim scholars accepted a hadith as Sahih only when its authenticity was established on the basis of both Fann-i-Riwaayat (The art of sequence of narration) and Fann-i-Daraayat (The art of logical concordance). Moreover, a Hadith should not have contradicted the Sunnah and the Quran. I am not interested and none of us is any more qualified to determine the methodology that was used for accepting or rejecting a Hadith based on Fann-i-Riwaayat. These are old stories. All those who reported them are dead more than a thousand years ago and we have no way to verify their trustworthiness. At this moment the only method left to determine the sihhat (soundness) of a Hadith is Fann-iDaraayat and its compatibility with the Quran. Asif Iftikhar writes "Therefore, a Hadith can be regarded as a source of religious guidance only 'if the basis of that Hadith exists in the Quran or the Sunnah or the established principles of human nature and intellect. Moreover, it should not be contradictory to any of these bases" (from The Authenticity of Hadith) The same author writes "Imam Ibni Ali Jauzee is reported to have said: "If you find a Hadith against the dictates of commonsense or contrary to a universal rule, consider it a fabrication; discussions about the trustworthiness of its narrators are needless. Similarly, such Ahadith should be suspected as are beyond comprehension to the extent that they leave no room for any possible explanation. Also, a Hadith in which colossal recompense is promised for a minor deed and a Hadith which is absurd in meaning are suspect." By examining some of the hadiths in the light of "commonsense", and the recommendations of Ibni Ali Jauzee we find many of them, despite being acknowledged as Sahih do not qualify as such and can be rejected. Take the following Hadith for example: Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 43, Number 652 Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "While a man was on the way, he found a thorny branch of a tree there on the way and removed it. Allah thanked him for that deed and forgave him."
Here it seems that the recompense outweighs the good deed and if we had to follow the sound advise of Ibni Ali Jauzee, we have to discard this Hadith as false. Well, this might seem something trivial but the implication is immense. By proving that a hadith that has been categorized as sahih is not sahih, we establish that is is prudent to be suspicious of the authenticity of the rest of the hadithes classified as sahih. In fact this proves that despite the fact that 90% of the Muslims believe in the Bukhari and in Muslim, and despite the fact that these books were regarded the most infallible books of guidance after the Quran for the last 1200 yeas, those books are not trustworthy after all.
*May peace be upon you.* *Make sure you read this:* I very strongly suggest that you look into Quranism (following the Quran alone) vs following other books that have been falsly ascribed to Muhammeds Name after he passed (also known as hadiths which sunnis and shias respectively follow). Mainstream "Islam" is a fasad and don't portray what true Islam (submission to Allah) is. The issue is that they have accepted the so called hadiths when they where written over 200 years after the Quran was revealed, and Allah even speaks against people who follow them. Such as in the following verse: *Then in which hadith (saying) after this [Quran] will they believe?* - Quran 77:50. It's estimated that over 99% of people who claim to be Muslims. Go against that verse. Aswell as other verses that speaks against the traditional Hadiths and advocate for Quranism (following the Quran alone). Such as the following Quran verses: 6:112-117, 45:6-8, 12:111 etc. If you see this and want to contact me and talk about this topic. You may contact me on Instagram. Just tell me first if you are interested before I decide to give it out. People will come with logical fallacies such as "how can the majority be wrong?" and, "how will we know how to pray without the traditional hadiths?" The answers are simple and clear. Contact me for more information, in shaa Allah. *So why don't I delve into that here?* Because I'm not looking to debate numerous people all at once. Since that's what traditional hadith followers like sunnis and shias usually end up trying to do. But you seem genuin and I don't mind explaining things to you, which almost no one will (because they are either ignorant or merely disingenuous about a multitude of Quran related topics). The Quran is guidance from Allah. And the traditional Hadiths came about as a scheme from Shaytan to deceive mankind and divide the Muslims, which we have clearly been warned about in verse 6:112. The same thing happened with the followers of Musa, Isa and other prophets. Be very careful about this. Because if you die while having rejected the Quran verses I've presented, then Jahannam (The Hellfire) will be your eternal abode (as mentioned in 45:6-8). Peace.
@@zeeshanraw May peace be upon you. The "Sahih" hadiths are not acceptable as a source of guidance in any way. The Quran verses are clear and I've provided plenty of evidence. I've been through scenarios like this plenty of times before. I've encountered all the arguments you may present. And nothing you may come with changes my stance. My stance, which is the actual Quranic stance while rejected by the vast majority of people who claim to be Muslim (read 25:30 & 77:50 & 6:116). As I said in my initial comment. I'm not here to debate you one after another. My comment is only an invitation for the sister to make research and to look at the Quran in the way its intended to be looked at (away from traditional hadith). And ofcurse, if she has questions, I will be available (in shaa Allah) if she want to contact me on instagram. The Quran is an explanation/clarification for all things, remember that (Read 12:111).
@@uncleiroh3451 Rejecting Hadiths: The Fitnah of the Quranists There are some “Muslims” in our times who follow a recent new movement (19th-20th century) which rejects hadiths, hence, deviating from the path of mainstream Islam. They pose and comment on many issues related to Islam from their viewpoint and reject many fundamental aspects of our religion. Worst of all, they try to present their views as the mainstream opinion. It should be made clear that they do not represent mainstream Islam or Muslims in any way or form. The ummah (nation) of Muhammad (pbuh) accepts the Qur’an and hadiths as legitimate forms of sources for deriving Islamic laws. We, the mainstream Muslims, acknowledge that both, the Qur’an and hadiths, are a guidance from Allah. Their History During the colonial period, when most of the Muslim world came under the subjugation of the West, some “scholars” arose in places like Egypt (Taha Hussein), India (Abdullah Chakralawi and Ghulam Ahmed Pervaiz), and Turkey (Zia Gogelup), who began questioning the authenticity and relevance of hadith. It was not that some genius had found flaws in the hadith study that had eluded the entire ummah for thirteen centuries. It was simply that the pressures from the dominant Western civilization to conform were too strong for them to withstand. They buckled. Prophetic teachings and life example - Hadith - was the obstacle in this process and so it became the target. About Their Movement It is a movement that holds the Qur’an to be the most authentic criterion in Islam. Quranists (a common name for them) generally reject the religious authority of Hadith (cataloged narratives of what the Prophet Muhammad is reported to have said and done), as they consider it inconsistent with the Qur’an. This in contrast to the Sunni’s which consider hadiths essential for the Islamic faith. However, we the mainstream Muslims (whose ideology has existed since the time of the Prophet) believe that hadiths are necessary and are a legitimate form of extraction for divine guidance. We believe that Qur’an and hadiths go hand in hand and one explains the other. The Qur’an is general and the sunnah is specific and detailed. Hadiths are the interpretation of the Qur’an by the Prophet (pbuh). The Quranists’ rejection of hadiths have led them to turn the Qur’an into a toy which they interpret based on their own intellect and desires. The hadiths, the mainstream Muslims say, preserve the meaning of the Qur’an. This is why Allah tells us in the Qur’an [meaning of which is]: And We revealed to you [O Muhammad] the message [Qur’an] that you may make clear to the people what was sent down to them and that they might give thought. [Qur’an 16:44] His HADITHS are that clarification! There are also numerous verses in the Qur’an where Allah specifically commands the Muslims to obey the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), for example: And We did not send any messenger except to be obeyed by permission of Allah. [Qur’an 4:64] But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you, [O Muhammad], judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you have judged and submit in [full, willing] submission. [Qur’an 4:65] He who obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah; but those who turn away - We have not sent you over them as a guardian. [Qur’an 4:80] And when it is said to them, “Come to what Allah has revealed and to the Messenger,” you see the hypocrites turning away from you in aversion. [Qur’an 4:61] Just as We have sent among you a messenger from yourselves reciting to you Our verses and purifying you and teaching you the Book and wisdom and teaching you that which you did not know. [Qur’an 2:151] The above verses show that the Messenger (pbuh) plays a big role in addition to the Qur’an. This is how the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) understood the religion as well. They understood that not everything is in the Qur’an. For example, it is narrated from Abdullah bin Khalid that he said to Abdullah bin Umar, a companion of Muhammad (pbuh) and the son of the second caliph of Islam: “We find (mention of) the prayer of the resident and the prayer in a state of fear in the Qur’an, but we do not find any mention of the prayer of the traveler. Abdullah said to him: ‘Allah sent Muhammad (pbuh) to us, and we did not know anything, rather we do what we saw Muhammad (pbuh) doing.” (Reported by Ibn Majah, Ibn Qayyim said it is authentic) The prophet (pbuh) warned us against them in a hadith which they of course deny: “Soon there will come a time that a man will be reclining on his pillow, and when one of my hadiths is narrated he will say: ‘The Book of Allah is (sufficient) between us and you. Whatever it states is permissible, we will take as permissible, and whatever it states is forbidden, we will take as forbidden.’ Verily, whatever the Messenger of Allah has forbidden is like that which Allah has forbidden.”(Reported by Ahmad, Abu Daawood, Ibn Maajah and at-Tirmidhee, who declared it hasan. Al-Albaanee declared it saheeh in Saheehul-Jaami’ (no.8186)) Now, in my discussion with some of them, they will acknowledge that yes even the companions of Muhammad (pbuh), who saw, lived, learned, and met the last prophet himself, did not reject hadiths as a whole (they may differ on or doubt individual hadiths) but rather followed them and derived rulings from them. So what’s the problem? Their response: “Brother, they were just human beings and made mistakes. We shouldn’t accept it just because they did it.” Just think about that for a moment. The very people who were extremely involved with the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) on a daily basis and learned directly from him were somehow collectively mistaken on the issue of following hadiths. I mean we have direct quotes from them acknowledging the sunnah and their strong desire to follow it to the best of their ability for God’s sake! Wouldn’t the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) have clarified to them to follow the Qur’an alone and not his hadiths? But somehow they were all wrong and this newly formed sect from the colonial period figured it all out. Completely absurd. As for their delusional claim that hadiths were not written down until hundreds of years later, then I have already discussed this issue in a different post. Their Hypocrisies These hadith rejectors will criticize the sunnis for relying on hadiths while it was these same sunnis who preserved the Qur’an generation after generation! For some reason, they have trouble understanding the fact that if they do not trust our preservation methods when it comes to hadiths, then why do they trust our preservation method when it comes to the Qur’an?! An ignorant among them once responded to me with: “because the Qur’an was compiled during the time of the Prophet (pbuh).” This is completely false! It was compiled after the time of the Prophet by the same people who today call themselves Ahlu Sunnah wal Jama’ah (a.k.a SUNNI)! The ironic thing is if one were to ask them about the history of the Qur’an, they would have to go to hadiths else there is no other way. The Qur’an itself does not give its own history. Hence, they will go to hadiths when it suits their agenda and ideology. The reality is that there are numerous verses which cannot be understood without hadiths, for example: Why [is it that] when a disaster struck you, although you had struck with one twice as great, you said, “From where is this?” Say, “It is from yourselves.” Indeed, Allah is over all things competent. [Qur’an 3:165] When did this verse come down? What disaster is this verse talking about? What was struck twice as great? Another verse: And what struck you on the day the two armies met was by permission of Allah that He might make evident the [true] believers. [Qur’an 3:166] What two armies? And on what day? What happened that day exactly? Where is this information in the Qur’an? It isn’t there but it is in hadiths. Another example: Allah has already given you victory in many regions and [even] on the day of Hunayn, when your great number pleased you, but it did not avail you at all, and the earth was confining for you with its vastness; then you turned back, fleeing. [Qur’an 9:25] What is Allah speaking about here? What is the Day of Hunayn and its victory? What exactly happened on that day? You cannot provide any of these details from the Qur’an.
@@kabulibnafghanistanalkhura7794 Rejecting Hadiths: The Fitnah of the Quranists There are some “Muslims” in our times who follow a recent new movement (19th-20th century) which rejects hadiths, hence, deviating from the path of mainstream Islam. They pose and comment on many issues related to Islam from their viewpoint and reject many fundamental aspects of our religion. Worst of all, they try to present their views as the mainstream opinion. It should be made clear that they do not represent mainstream Islam or Muslims in any way or form. The ummah (nation) of Muhammad (pbuh) accepts the Qur’an and hadiths as legitimate forms of sources for deriving Islamic laws. We, the mainstream Muslims, acknowledge that both, the Qur’an and hadiths, are a guidance from Allah. Their History During the colonial period, when most of the Muslim world came under the subjugation of the West, some “scholars” arose in places like Egypt (Taha Hussein), India (Abdullah Chakralawi and Ghulam Ahmed Pervaiz), and Turkey (Zia Gogelup), who began questioning the authenticity and relevance of hadith. It was not that some genius had found flaws in the hadith study that had eluded the entire ummah for thirteen centuries. It was simply that the pressures from the dominant Western civilization to conform were too strong for them to withstand. They buckled. Prophetic teachings and life example - Hadith - was the obstacle in this process and so it became the target. About Their Movement It is a movement that holds the Qur’an to be the most authentic criterion in Islam. Quranists (a common name for them) generally reject the religious authority of Hadith (cataloged narratives of what the Prophet Muhammad is reported to have said and done), as they consider it inconsistent with the Qur’an. This in contrast to the Sunni’s which consider hadiths essential for the Islamic faith. However, we the mainstream Muslims (whose ideology has existed since the time of the Prophet) believe that hadiths are necessary and are a legitimate form of extraction for divine guidance. We believe that Qur’an and hadiths go hand in hand and one explains the other. The Qur’an is general and the sunnah is specific and detailed. Hadiths are the interpretation of the Qur’an by the Prophet (pbuh). The Quranists’ rejection of hadiths have led them to turn the Qur’an into a toy which they interpret based on their own intellect and desires. The hadiths, the mainstream Muslims say, preserve the meaning of the Qur’an. This is why Allah tells us in the Qur’an [meaning of which is]: And We revealed to you [O Muhammad] the message [Qur’an] that you may make clear to the people what was sent down to them and that they might give thought. [Qur’an 16:44] His HADITHS are that clarification! There are also numerous verses in the Qur’an where Allah specifically commands the Muslims to obey the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), for example: And We did not send any messenger except to be obeyed by permission of Allah. [Qur’an 4:64] But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you, [O Muhammad], judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you have judged and submit in [full, willing] submission. [Qur’an 4:65] He who obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah; but those who turn away - We have not sent you over them as a guardian. [Qur’an 4:80] And when it is said to them, “Come to what Allah has revealed and to the Messenger,” you see the hypocrites turning away from you in aversion. [Qur’an 4:61] Just as We have sent among you a messenger from yourselves reciting to you Our verses and purifying you and teaching you the Book and wisdom and teaching you that which you did not know. [Qur’an 2:151] The above verses show that the Messenger (pbuh) plays a big role in addition to the Qur’an. This is how the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) understood the religion as well. They understood that not everything is in the Qur’an. For example, it is narrated from Abdullah bin Khalid that he said to Abdullah bin Umar, a companion of Muhammad (pbuh) and the son of the second caliph of Islam: “We find (mention of) the prayer of the resident and the prayer in a state of fear in the Qur’an, but we do not find any mention of the prayer of the traveler. Abdullah said to him: ‘Allah sent Muhammad (pbuh) to us, and we did not know anything, rather we do what we saw Muhammad (pbuh) doing.” (Reported by Ibn Majah, Ibn Qayyim said it is authentic) The prophet (pbuh) warned us against them in a hadith which they of course deny: “Soon there will come a time that a man will be reclining on his pillow, and when one of my hadiths is narrated he will say: ‘The Book of Allah is (sufficient) between us and you. Whatever it states is permissible, we will take as permissible, and whatever it states is forbidden, we will take as forbidden.’ Verily, whatever the Messenger of Allah has forbidden is like that which Allah has forbidden.”(Reported by Ahmad, Abu Daawood, Ibn Maajah and at-Tirmidhee, who declared it hasan. Al-Albaanee declared it saheeh in Saheehul-Jaami’ (no.8186)) Now, in my discussion with some of them, they will acknowledge that yes even the companions of Muhammad (pbuh), who saw, lived, learned, and met the last prophet himself, did not reject hadiths as a whole (they may differ on or doubt individual hadiths) but rather followed them and derived rulings from them. So what’s the problem? Their response: “Brother, they were just human beings and made mistakes. We shouldn’t accept it just because they did it.” Just think about that for a moment. The very people who were extremely involved with the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) on a daily basis and learned directly from him were somehow collectively mistaken on the issue of following hadiths. I mean we have direct quotes from them acknowledging the sunnah and their strong desire to follow it to the best of their ability for God’s sake! Wouldn’t the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) have clarified to them to follow the Qur’an alone and not his hadiths? But somehow they were all wrong and this newly formed sect from the colonial period figured it all out. Completely absurd. As for their delusional claim that hadiths were not written down until hundreds of years later, then I have already discussed this issue in a different post. Their Hypocrisies These hadith rejectors will criticize the sunnis for relying on hadiths while it was these same sunnis who preserved the Qur’an generation after generation! For some reason, they have trouble understanding the fact that if they do not trust our preservation methods when it comes to hadiths, then why do they trust our preservation method when it comes to the Qur’an?! An ignorant among them once responded to me with: “because the Qur’an was compiled during the time of the Prophet (pbuh).” This is completely false! It was compiled after the time of the Prophet by the same people who today call themselves Ahlu Sunnah wal Jama’ah (a.k.a SUNNI)! The ironic thing is if one were to ask them about the history of the Qur’an, they would have to go to hadiths else there is no other way. The Qur’an itself does not give its own history. Hence, they will go to hadiths when it suits their agenda and ideology. The reality is that there are numerous verses which cannot be understood without hadiths, for example: Why [is it that] when a disaster struck you, although you had struck with one twice as great, you said, “From where is this?” Say, “It is from yourselves.” Indeed, Allah is over all things competent. [Qur’an 3:165] When did this verse come down? What disaster is this verse talking about? What was struck twice as great? Another verse: And what struck you on the day the two armies met was by permission of Allah that He might make evident the [true] believers. [Qur’an 3:166] What two armies? And on what day? What happened that day exactly? Where is this information in the Qur’an? It isn’t there but it is in hadiths. Another example: Allah has already given you victory in many regions and [even] on the day of Hunayn, when your great number pleased you, but it did not avail you at all, and the earth was confining for you with its vastness; then you turned back, fleeing. [Qur’an 9:25] What is Allah speaking about here? What is the Day of Hunayn and its victory? What exactly happened on that day? You cannot provide any of these details from the Qur’an.
Avatar aang go back to waterbending do not spread your misguidance to this beautiful sister otherwise you will be refuted the hadith rejectors are not from the muslims !!!
Damn this video made want to visit Costa Rica. Such beautiful land Masha Allah 💙
Nature is truly beautiful... It Must be preserved
Absolutely!:)
Yo so funnyyyy
إنّ مهر الفتاة الحقيقي هو ما تجده بعد الزواج وليس قبله ❤️
نتخانق الف مره لكن مفرطش فيه ولا مره الدنيا كلها تغيب لكن هو ميغبش 💙🌍
Lmao Me and my sis need to hang out with you. Your personality kills me 🤣
The nature just looks so peaceful
What a beautiful place, and tbh beautifully shot 😄 MashaAllah
Keep watching your awesome videos and Alhmdulillah watching the beauty of nature 😍
Subhanallah.. Costa Rice looks beautiful
Assalamualaykum sister,
Costa Rica looks soooo beautiful Ma Sha Allah. Allah's creation is amazing!
Have you watched a guy a guy called Aanghel? Would be interesting to see what you think of his conversion story
May Allah bless you and your family
Wow, never knew Costa Rica is so beautiful! Thank you for this ❤️
Keep active! Your home is beautiful!
MashaAllah wow i can watch tgis vedio over and over nevet get tired of the cleanliness and the trees I didnt know Costa Rica. Its hard to imagine you lived there and bren borrn there??.. its jusy like a vacation😍 place..
The amount of men commenting about the sisters beauty is really scary. Stop simping, lower your gaze, do it the halal way and fear Allah.
How can someone watch a youtube video with their gaze lowered xD lol
@@nabsnabster3488 We should love the beauty of our own wife and not look at other woman staring at them.
Prophet Muhammad ﷺ once said, “No one who has an atom’s weight of pride in his heart will enter Paradise.” A man asked, “What if a person likes his clothes to look good and his shoes to look good?” The Prophet ﷺ replied, “Allah is beautiful and He loves beauty. Pride means denying the truth and looking down on people.”
Be handsome, were good looking clothes and be a role model to others. Other than that it is completly out of the context the hadith you quoted.
Furthermore you can enjoy the content without looking at the person the whole time enjoying beatuy. It's not only about being modest outside of the house, but also being modest infront of Al Baseer (The All-Seeing) without any person being near by. This is first and foremost a reminder to myself brothers. We all struggle, but that is the jihad al Akbar, which when won till the end of our life it will grant us al jannah with the most beautiful wifes. Be patient, be modest, fear Allah.
ok, sharia police officer xD
@@Btraain Firstly I didn't quote the hadith. 2) What are YOU doing watching the video then hypocrite, go watch your own wife's youtube video then xD
3) We judge If someone is beautiful or not automatically. So you've done it too in your head, lets be honest, and the thirsty nice guys just post comments saying "mashallah" lol, let them be. At least they are honest. While you on the other hand x_x
@@Btraain Even so the Matan (content/meaning) of the hadith can still apply. "A dirty mind thinks dirty". Listen m8, go work on yourself instead of trying to teach Muslims the abc's of Islam in the youtube comments. You don't have any moral or intellectual standing right now and anyone with a bit of sense can tell.
Beautiful faith, Beautiful girl, beautiful family, beautiful country...all in one video. =)
Raaa ur actually a breath of fresh air 😂
I can listen to you all day long with that Extra charisma your spurting all day .
Much love from a fellow Muslim from the UK and good luck on your new journey to Islam . I can’t wait for your future videos , uv got a friend in me 💙 Costa rica seems hella dope btw.
A TH-camr on the rise. So funny. Can't wait to see where your next adventure takes us.
" look at dat.. it's a wild Chihuahua! "
Guava reminds me of my childhood. Used to climb the guava tree n sit on its big branch for hours after school eating guava as my lunch😂😂. ❤️ from indonesia.
Very peaceful. It's like time took a vacation in your village. Walking through your village reminded me so much of Bangladesh except your village looks so pictureseque.
subhanallah, even though we do have similar rainforest but when it comes to fruits almost diff though haha
لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين
You're funny and the video is great
Interest.....
Salam by the way. The guavas in Costa Rica/South America in general look different (more pink, even for a ripe one) than the ones from Asia. I wonder if they taste the same or similar. Do you have jujube in your country
I think they taste very different and I'm not sure, I don't think I've ever heard of that fruit!
I have visited Costa Rica and most of Latin America, when ripe the taste is similar to the ones in Asia. Jujube prefers drier climate and is native to China and South Asia.
Beautiful nature in Costa Rica
Such a beautiful country ma sha allha
look at all that bamboo!! You can make so many things with that.
Maybe I will make myself a hut haha
@@yarielavalverde405 a Pizza Hut hahahaaa....✌😹
@@yarielavalverde405 That is what we uded to make. P.s. Tell your grand parents to grow some durian fruits. Sell it to China... $$$
so lush out there! so green! i know where to vacation next time with the wifey and baby.
thats beautiful . you guys have fun .
Man you so lucky to live in such a beautiful place!
Masyallah Costa Rica is beautiful, thank you for showing beautiful sister
Beautiful jungle you are lucky
Your mum looks so young she could be your sister 😊
Your country looks amazing 😊
Love from Nepal sis🇳🇵🇳🇵
I bet you were a very playful and curious girl :)
Costa Rica is a great place. It seems
It’s jungle girl!
we call this fruit Giava in Sudan and we sell and buy it like orange and banana in market
👍🏻
I'd love to know more about Islam in Costa Rica and in surrounding countries, along with current perceptions of the masses, and other Muslim revert workers who are making a difference to change the image :)
Sis, how is your English sooo perfect 😍 and you live in Costa Rica?
Yes! I'm actually an English teacher as well:)
@@yarielavalverde405 ah that makes sense, I was amazed to hear your clear accent too. Visit us in Texas sometime :)
Is she your mom or your sister
that look like a property that was up for sale...looking to move there
All of that was my families property.
just like in my country...greetings from Indonesia, may Allah bless you and your family :)
أصبحنا على فطرة الإسلام وكلمة الإخلاص، وعلى دين نبينا محمد صل الله عليه وسلم، وعلى ملة أبينا إبراهيم حنيفًا مسلمًا ما كان من المشركين
many people Indonesia same like guava 👍🙏.
Costa Rica looks so similar with Indonesia
🔥🔥🔥
I am never eating guavas again lol
Que lindo q parte.? Que envidia, de la buena mashallah
Islamic reaction video your TH-cam channel upload
Great Idea!:)
@@yarielavalverde405 hey salam sister, where are you residing now? Your beautifull
@@sub_0292 I'm in Costa Rica
How old are you🙈
@@sub_0292 Fear Allah dude! Don't give out your personal info to the world sister, too many creeps that mean no good will prey on it!
Have you caught any snakes?
Not gonna lie I was scared from imagining there's a snake unde my bed. How do people live in the jungle.....?
assalamu'alaikum Masha Allah
Good video..
Assalam mualaikum. I am surprised. Your English is excellent. I have always thought Puerto Rican speak mainly Spanish. My apologies to all Puerto Ricans
Costa Rican****
@@yarielavalverde405 Truly ashamed. Sorry. Costa Ricans
ماشاءاللّٰه ❤🇵🇰
Would be nice to hear the native language(s) in your next videos
I’m in the trapics too we should link up
Show us the country)
I wonder if Sandra Bullock is you undercover or what ??
Be nont rude
@@fahadmalik8862 It seems you misunderstood me bro ... So please delete it ...
@@ahmedalshalchi Sorry. no go
Wow Mashaa'Allah Lets be friends
Lool 🥺
بسم الله ما شاء الله
اللهمَّﷺصَلِّﷺوسَـــلِّمْﷺوَبَارِكﷺْعلىﷺنَبِيِّنَـــ-اللهمَّﷺصَلِّﷺوَسَـــلِّمْﷺوَبَارِكﷺْعلىﷺنَبِيِّنَـــاﷺمُحمَّدﷺ
Aah your face is very similar to your father's
Salam from Australia
why did you lick that rotten fruit LMAO
It's not rotten. It's ripe. You eat it when its pink, but I prefer eating them before they're pink (even though these aren't ripe)
Very pretty sister where is this place please...
Yariela Valverde 600 years before mohammed received revelation from "angel gabriel" in a cave, Angel Gabriel visited Mary (LUKE 1:35) and calls JESUS the SON of GOD, so why 600 years later does "gabriel" appear to mohammed saying, "allah has no son" this would mean there is a false message. In 2 CORINTHIANS 11:14 The bible says: marvel not for satan himself MASQUERADES himself as an angel of light. Could this be who visited Mohammad in the cave? To deceive people and to take JESUS off the cross? There is a hidden agenda to cover the truth, the founder of islam is not Mohammed, rather satan himself. JESUS CHRIST is the only way to heaven
(John 14:6) only JESUS can pay the penalty for our sins, JESUS is the VISIBLE image of the invisible GOD,
GOD manifested in the FLESH. (COLOSSIANS 1:15) (1TIMOTHY 3:16)
(JOHN 1:1-14) (PHILIPPIANS 2:6-11).
The bible says that if we confess that JESUS is LORD, and believe in our heart GOD raised him from the dead, we shall be SAVED (ROMANS 10:9) put your faith in JESUS CHRIST and be saved!!!! To reject JESUS CHRIST IS TO REJECT SALVATION. the Jesus from islam is a lie from Mohammed. JESUS IS MORE THAN A PROPHET. HE IS THE LORD.
👍👍👍👑👑♥️♥️♥️🎁🎁🎁✔✔✔
thank you for telling her but she is allowed to choose to believe what she does. sharing this just makes it seem like you're not respecting the right of free will that God gave her. I am happy you're in love with your religion but that's you're own belief and she has her own. God bless
You look like Flauna
you are so beautiful and everything about you and the most important thing revert :)
make due you get rabies vaccination
But I have a duty to expose Islamic contradictions so let me explain. Sunnah as a Muslim is nothing but following the sayings, practices and life of Prophet Muhammad. Quran cannot be the only source for Sunnah so you must read Hadith to live life and practices of Prophet Muhammad. But Hadith is full of contradictions and with million absurdities and you will realize that Islam is a concocted religion and off course, Muslims are defendants not jury because they are blinded by their own desire to believe the absurd.. read below for an explanation:
The early Muslim scholars accepted a hadith as Sahih only when its authenticity was established on the basis of both Fann-i-Riwaayat (The art of sequence of narration) and Fann-i-Daraayat (The art of logical concordance). Moreover, a Hadith should not have contradicted the Sunnah and the Quran. I am not interested and none of us is any more qualified to determine the methodology that was used for accepting or rejecting a Hadith based on Fann-i-Riwaayat. These are old stories. All those who reported them are dead more than a thousand years ago and we have no way to verify their trustworthiness. At this moment the only method left to determine the sihhat (soundness) of a Hadith is Fann-iDaraayat and its compatibility with the Quran. Asif Iftikhar writes "Therefore, a Hadith can be regarded as a source of religious guidance only 'if the basis of that Hadith exists in the Quran or the Sunnah or the established principles of human nature and intellect. Moreover, it should not be contradictory to any of these bases" (from The Authenticity of Hadith)
The same author writes "Imam Ibni Ali Jauzee is reported to have said: "If you find a Hadith against the dictates of commonsense or contrary to a universal rule, consider it a fabrication; discussions about the trustworthiness of its narrators are needless. Similarly, such Ahadith should be suspected as are beyond comprehension to the extent that they leave no room for any possible explanation. Also, a Hadith in which colossal recompense is promised for a minor deed and a Hadith which is absurd in meaning are suspect."
By examining some of the hadiths in the light of "commonsense", and the recommendations of Ibni Ali Jauzee we find many of them, despite being acknowledged as Sahih do not qualify as such and can be rejected. Take the following Hadith for example:
Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 43, Number 652 Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "While a man was on the way, he found a thorny branch of a tree there on the way and removed it. Allah thanked him for that deed and forgave him."
Here it seems that the recompense outweighs the good deed and if we had to follow the sound advise of Ibni Ali Jauzee, we have to discard this Hadith as false. Well, this might seem something trivial but the implication is immense. By proving that a hadith that has been categorized as sahih is not sahih, we establish that is is prudent to be suspicious of the authenticity of the rest of the hadithes classified as sahih. In fact this proves that despite the fact that 90% of the Muslims believe in the Bukhari and in Muslim, and despite the fact that these books were regarded the most infallible books of guidance after the Quran for the last 1200 yeas, those books are not trustworthy after all.
هذه خطيئة
I want your instagram please
yariela_valverde
*May peace be upon you.*
*Make sure you read this:*
I very strongly suggest that you look into Quranism (following the Quran alone) vs following other books that have been falsly ascribed to Muhammeds Name after he passed (also known as hadiths which sunnis and shias respectively follow).
Mainstream "Islam" is a fasad and don't portray what true Islam (submission to Allah) is. The issue is that they have accepted the so called hadiths when they where written over 200 years after the Quran was revealed, and Allah even speaks against people who follow them.
Such as in the following verse:
*Then in which hadith (saying) after this [Quran] will they believe?* - Quran 77:50.
It's estimated that over 99% of people who claim to be Muslims. Go against that verse. Aswell as other verses that speaks against the traditional Hadiths and advocate for Quranism (following the Quran alone).
Such as the following Quran verses:
6:112-117, 45:6-8, 12:111 etc.
If you see this and want to contact me and talk about this topic. You may contact me on Instagram. Just tell me first if you are interested before I decide to give it out.
People will come with logical fallacies such as "how can the majority be wrong?" and, "how will we know how to pray without the traditional hadiths?" The answers are simple and clear. Contact me for more information, in shaa Allah.
*So why don't I delve into that here?*
Because I'm not looking to debate numerous people all at once. Since that's what traditional hadith followers like sunnis and shias usually end up trying to do. But you seem genuin and I don't mind explaining things to you, which almost no one will (because they are either ignorant or merely disingenuous about a multitude of Quran related topics).
The Quran is guidance from Allah.
And the traditional Hadiths came about as a scheme from Shaytan to deceive mankind and divide the Muslims, which we have clearly been warned about in verse 6:112. The same thing happened with the followers of Musa, Isa and other prophets. Be very careful about this. Because if you die while having rejected the Quran verses I've presented, then Jahannam (The Hellfire) will be your eternal abode (as mentioned in 45:6-8).
Peace.
Bro Sahih hadiths are right bro We have to follow Quran And Hadith also Bro.
@@zeeshanraw
May peace be upon you.
The "Sahih" hadiths are not acceptable as a source of guidance in any way. The Quran verses are clear and I've provided plenty of evidence.
I've been through scenarios like this plenty of times before. I've encountered all the arguments you may present. And nothing you may come with changes my stance. My stance, which is the actual Quranic stance while rejected by the vast majority of people who claim to be Muslim (read 25:30 & 77:50 & 6:116).
As I said in my initial comment.
I'm not here to debate you one after another. My comment is only an invitation for the sister to make research and to look at the Quran in the way its intended to be looked at (away from traditional hadith).
And ofcurse, if she has questions, I will be available (in shaa Allah) if she want to contact me on instagram.
The Quran is an explanation/clarification for all things, remember that (Read 12:111).
@@uncleiroh3451 Rejecting Hadiths: The Fitnah of the Quranists
There are some “Muslims” in our times who follow a recent new movement (19th-20th century) which rejects hadiths, hence, deviating from the path of mainstream Islam. They pose and comment on many issues related to Islam from their viewpoint and reject many fundamental aspects of our religion. Worst of all, they try to present their views as the mainstream opinion. It should be made clear that they do not represent mainstream Islam or Muslims in any way or form. The ummah (nation) of Muhammad (pbuh) accepts the Qur’an and hadiths as legitimate forms of sources for deriving Islamic laws. We, the mainstream Muslims, acknowledge that both, the Qur’an and hadiths, are a guidance from Allah.
Their History
During the colonial period, when most of the Muslim world came under the subjugation of the West, some “scholars” arose in places like Egypt (Taha Hussein), India (Abdullah Chakralawi and Ghulam Ahmed Pervaiz), and Turkey (Zia Gogelup), who began questioning the authenticity and relevance of hadith. It was not that some genius had found flaws in the hadith study that had eluded the entire ummah for thirteen centuries. It was simply that the pressures from the dominant Western civilization to conform were too strong for them to withstand. They buckled. Prophetic teachings and life example - Hadith - was the obstacle in this process and so it became the target.
About Their Movement
It is a movement that holds the Qur’an to be the most authentic criterion in Islam. Quranists (a common name for them) generally reject the religious authority of Hadith (cataloged narratives of what the Prophet Muhammad is reported to have said and done), as they consider it inconsistent with the Qur’an. This in contrast to the Sunni’s which consider hadiths essential for the Islamic faith.
However, we the mainstream Muslims (whose ideology has existed since the time of the Prophet) believe that hadiths are necessary and are a legitimate form of extraction for divine guidance. We believe that Qur’an and hadiths go hand in hand and one explains the other. The Qur’an is general and the sunnah is specific and detailed. Hadiths are the interpretation of the Qur’an by the Prophet (pbuh). The Quranists’ rejection of hadiths have led them to turn the Qur’an into a toy which they interpret based on their own intellect and desires. The hadiths, the mainstream Muslims say, preserve the meaning of the Qur’an. This is why Allah tells us in the Qur’an [meaning of which is]:
And We revealed to you [O Muhammad] the message [Qur’an] that you may make clear to the people what was sent down to them and that they might give thought. [Qur’an 16:44]
His HADITHS are that clarification!
There are also numerous verses in the Qur’an where Allah specifically commands the Muslims to obey the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), for example:
And We did not send any messenger except to be obeyed by permission of Allah. [Qur’an 4:64]
But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you, [O Muhammad], judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you have judged and submit in [full, willing] submission. [Qur’an 4:65]
He who obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah; but those who turn away - We have not sent you over them as a guardian. [Qur’an 4:80]
And when it is said to them, “Come to what Allah has revealed and to the Messenger,” you see the hypocrites turning away from you in aversion. [Qur’an 4:61]
Just as We have sent among you a messenger from yourselves reciting to you Our verses and purifying you and teaching you the Book and wisdom and teaching you that which you did not know. [Qur’an 2:151]
The above verses show that the Messenger (pbuh) plays a big role in addition to the Qur’an. This is how the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) understood the religion as well. They understood that not everything is in the Qur’an. For example, it is narrated from Abdullah bin Khalid that he said to Abdullah bin Umar, a companion of Muhammad (pbuh) and the son of the second caliph of Islam:
“We find (mention of) the prayer of the resident and the prayer in a state of fear in the Qur’an, but we do not find any mention of the prayer of the traveler. Abdullah said to him: ‘Allah sent Muhammad (pbuh) to us, and we did not know anything, rather we do what we saw Muhammad (pbuh) doing.” (Reported by Ibn Majah, Ibn Qayyim said it is authentic)
The prophet (pbuh) warned us against them in a hadith which they of course deny:
“Soon there will come a time that a man will be reclining on his pillow, and when one of my hadiths is narrated he will say: ‘The Book of Allah is (sufficient) between us and you. Whatever it states is permissible, we will take as permissible, and whatever it states is forbidden, we will take as forbidden.’ Verily, whatever the Messenger of Allah has forbidden is like that which Allah has forbidden.”(Reported by Ahmad, Abu Daawood, Ibn Maajah and at-Tirmidhee, who declared it hasan. Al-Albaanee declared it saheeh in Saheehul-Jaami’ (no.8186))
Now, in my discussion with some of them, they will acknowledge that yes even the companions of Muhammad (pbuh), who saw, lived, learned, and met the last prophet himself, did not reject hadiths as a whole (they may differ on or doubt individual hadiths) but rather followed them and derived rulings from them. So what’s the problem? Their response: “Brother, they were just human beings and made mistakes. We shouldn’t accept it just because they did it.”
Just think about that for a moment. The very people who were extremely involved with the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) on a daily basis and learned directly from him were somehow collectively mistaken on the issue of following hadiths. I mean we have direct quotes from them acknowledging the sunnah and their strong desire to follow it to the best of their ability for God’s sake! Wouldn’t the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) have clarified to them to follow the Qur’an alone and not his hadiths? But somehow they were all wrong and this newly formed sect from the colonial period figured it all out. Completely absurd.
As for their delusional claim that hadiths were not written down until hundreds of years later, then I have already discussed this issue in a different post.
Their Hypocrisies
These hadith rejectors will criticize the sunnis for relying on hadiths while it was these same sunnis who preserved the Qur’an generation after generation! For some reason, they have trouble understanding the fact that if they do not trust our preservation methods when it comes to hadiths, then why do they trust our preservation method when it comes to the Qur’an?! An ignorant among them once responded to me with: “because the Qur’an was compiled during the time of the Prophet (pbuh).” This is completely false! It was compiled after the time of the Prophet by the same people who today call themselves Ahlu Sunnah wal Jama’ah (a.k.a SUNNI)!
The ironic thing is if one were to ask them about the history of the Qur’an, they would have to go to hadiths else there is no other way. The Qur’an itself does not give its own history. Hence, they will go to hadiths when it suits their agenda and ideology. The reality is that there are numerous verses which cannot be understood without hadiths, for example:
Why [is it that] when a disaster struck you, although you had struck with one twice as great, you said, “From where is this?” Say, “It is from yourselves.” Indeed, Allah is over all things competent. [Qur’an 3:165]
When did this verse come down? What disaster is this verse talking about? What was struck twice as great?
Another verse:
And what struck you on the day the two armies met was by permission of Allah that He might make evident the [true] believers. [Qur’an 3:166] What two armies? And on what day? What happened that day exactly? Where is this information in the Qur’an? It isn’t there but it is in hadiths.
Another example:
Allah has already given you victory in many regions and [even] on the day of Hunayn, when your great number pleased you, but it did not avail you at all, and the earth was confining for you with its vastness; then you turned back, fleeing. [Qur’an 9:25]
What is Allah speaking about here? What is the Day of Hunayn and its victory? What exactly happened on that day? You cannot provide any of these details from the Qur’an.
@@kabulibnafghanistanalkhura7794 Rejecting Hadiths: The Fitnah of the Quranists
There are some “Muslims” in our times who follow a recent new movement (19th-20th century) which rejects hadiths, hence, deviating from the path of mainstream Islam. They pose and comment on many issues related to Islam from their viewpoint and reject many fundamental aspects of our religion. Worst of all, they try to present their views as the mainstream opinion. It should be made clear that they do not represent mainstream Islam or Muslims in any way or form. The ummah (nation) of Muhammad (pbuh) accepts the Qur’an and hadiths as legitimate forms of sources for deriving Islamic laws. We, the mainstream Muslims, acknowledge that both, the Qur’an and hadiths, are a guidance from Allah.
Their History
During the colonial period, when most of the Muslim world came under the subjugation of the West, some “scholars” arose in places like Egypt (Taha Hussein), India (Abdullah Chakralawi and Ghulam Ahmed Pervaiz), and Turkey (Zia Gogelup), who began questioning the authenticity and relevance of hadith. It was not that some genius had found flaws in the hadith study that had eluded the entire ummah for thirteen centuries. It was simply that the pressures from the dominant Western civilization to conform were too strong for them to withstand. They buckled. Prophetic teachings and life example - Hadith - was the obstacle in this process and so it became the target.
About Their Movement
It is a movement that holds the Qur’an to be the most authentic criterion in Islam. Quranists (a common name for them) generally reject the religious authority of Hadith (cataloged narratives of what the Prophet Muhammad is reported to have said and done), as they consider it inconsistent with the Qur’an. This in contrast to the Sunni’s which consider hadiths essential for the Islamic faith.
However, we the mainstream Muslims (whose ideology has existed since the time of the Prophet) believe that hadiths are necessary and are a legitimate form of extraction for divine guidance. We believe that Qur’an and hadiths go hand in hand and one explains the other. The Qur’an is general and the sunnah is specific and detailed. Hadiths are the interpretation of the Qur’an by the Prophet (pbuh). The Quranists’ rejection of hadiths have led them to turn the Qur’an into a toy which they interpret based on their own intellect and desires. The hadiths, the mainstream Muslims say, preserve the meaning of the Qur’an. This is why Allah tells us in the Qur’an [meaning of which is]:
And We revealed to you [O Muhammad] the message [Qur’an] that you may make clear to the people what was sent down to them and that they might give thought. [Qur’an 16:44]
His HADITHS are that clarification!
There are also numerous verses in the Qur’an where Allah specifically commands the Muslims to obey the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), for example:
And We did not send any messenger except to be obeyed by permission of Allah. [Qur’an 4:64]
But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you, [O Muhammad], judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you have judged and submit in [full, willing] submission. [Qur’an 4:65]
He who obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah; but those who turn away - We have not sent you over them as a guardian. [Qur’an 4:80]
And when it is said to them, “Come to what Allah has revealed and to the Messenger,” you see the hypocrites turning away from you in aversion. [Qur’an 4:61]
Just as We have sent among you a messenger from yourselves reciting to you Our verses and purifying you and teaching you the Book and wisdom and teaching you that which you did not know. [Qur’an 2:151]
The above verses show that the Messenger (pbuh) plays a big role in addition to the Qur’an. This is how the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) understood the religion as well. They understood that not everything is in the Qur’an. For example, it is narrated from Abdullah bin Khalid that he said to Abdullah bin Umar, a companion of Muhammad (pbuh) and the son of the second caliph of Islam:
“We find (mention of) the prayer of the resident and the prayer in a state of fear in the Qur’an, but we do not find any mention of the prayer of the traveler. Abdullah said to him: ‘Allah sent Muhammad (pbuh) to us, and we did not know anything, rather we do what we saw Muhammad (pbuh) doing.” (Reported by Ibn Majah, Ibn Qayyim said it is authentic)
The prophet (pbuh) warned us against them in a hadith which they of course deny:
“Soon there will come a time that a man will be reclining on his pillow, and when one of my hadiths is narrated he will say: ‘The Book of Allah is (sufficient) between us and you. Whatever it states is permissible, we will take as permissible, and whatever it states is forbidden, we will take as forbidden.’ Verily, whatever the Messenger of Allah has forbidden is like that which Allah has forbidden.”(Reported by Ahmad, Abu Daawood, Ibn Maajah and at-Tirmidhee, who declared it hasan. Al-Albaanee declared it saheeh in Saheehul-Jaami’ (no.8186))
Now, in my discussion with some of them, they will acknowledge that yes even the companions of Muhammad (pbuh), who saw, lived, learned, and met the last prophet himself, did not reject hadiths as a whole (they may differ on or doubt individual hadiths) but rather followed them and derived rulings from them. So what’s the problem? Their response: “Brother, they were just human beings and made mistakes. We shouldn’t accept it just because they did it.”
Just think about that for a moment. The very people who were extremely involved with the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) on a daily basis and learned directly from him were somehow collectively mistaken on the issue of following hadiths. I mean we have direct quotes from them acknowledging the sunnah and their strong desire to follow it to the best of their ability for God’s sake! Wouldn’t the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) have clarified to them to follow the Qur’an alone and not his hadiths? But somehow they were all wrong and this newly formed sect from the colonial period figured it all out. Completely absurd.
As for their delusional claim that hadiths were not written down until hundreds of years later, then I have already discussed this issue in a different post.
Their Hypocrisies
These hadith rejectors will criticize the sunnis for relying on hadiths while it was these same sunnis who preserved the Qur’an generation after generation! For some reason, they have trouble understanding the fact that if they do not trust our preservation methods when it comes to hadiths, then why do they trust our preservation method when it comes to the Qur’an?! An ignorant among them once responded to me with: “because the Qur’an was compiled during the time of the Prophet (pbuh).” This is completely false! It was compiled after the time of the Prophet by the same people who today call themselves Ahlu Sunnah wal Jama’ah (a.k.a SUNNI)!
The ironic thing is if one were to ask them about the history of the Qur’an, they would have to go to hadiths else there is no other way. The Qur’an itself does not give its own history. Hence, they will go to hadiths when it suits their agenda and ideology. The reality is that there are numerous verses which cannot be understood without hadiths, for example:
Why [is it that] when a disaster struck you, although you had struck with one twice as great, you said, “From where is this?” Say, “It is from yourselves.” Indeed, Allah is over all things competent. [Qur’an 3:165]
When did this verse come down? What disaster is this verse talking about? What was struck twice as great?
Another verse:
And what struck you on the day the two armies met was by permission of Allah that He might make evident the [true] believers. [Qur’an 3:166] What two armies? And on what day? What happened that day exactly? Where is this information in the Qur’an? It isn’t there but it is in hadiths.
Another example:
Allah has already given you victory in many regions and [even] on the day of Hunayn, when your great number pleased you, but it did not avail you at all, and the earth was confining for you with its vastness; then you turned back, fleeing. [Qur’an 9:25]
What is Allah speaking about here? What is the Day of Hunayn and its victory? What exactly happened on that day? You cannot provide any of these details from the Qur’an.
Avatar aang go back to waterbending do not spread your misguidance to this beautiful sister otherwise you will be refuted the hadith rejectors are not from the muslims !!!