The co-hosts are delusional lol how was she scared of a man who weighed less than her and was begging for air for 20 minutes? She’s sadistic and loved hurting him; HE was HER victim.
THAT'S WHAT I SAID SO BASICALLY THE DEFENSE WANTS FOLKS TO BELIEVE SHE LEFT AN OPENING WHERE HE COULD GET OUT BUT HE DECIDED TO STAY IN THEIR IN DIE...MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
STOP JUST STOP YOU GUYS SHE LIED ,IS THAT TO HARD FOR YOU TO SEE SHE LIED!!!! SHE DID IT BECAUSE SHE WANTED TO BE IN CONTROL AND HE GOT TIRED OF LISTENING TO HER DRUNK BUTT.
Wth difference does it make. He told her he couldn't breathe. He obviously was truthful. She left him. Thats truthful AND accurate..and torture. She said she didn't want him to get out and pushed his hand back in with a bat because she was afraid of him..yet in same breath say she assumed he could get out so she went to sleep. She didnt care one way or another what happened to him. She left him to die. And apparently with 2 of your panel members..thats okay. Interesting. So if a parent leaves their 2 yr old in a filled tub, pushes them back in when try to get out, then leave the room to go to sleep and say they assumed they could get out..that wouldn't be criminal either when they drown instead?? Same thing.
Very accurate. If she was THAT scared of him she’d have made sure he could never get out. But she simultaneously was too scared so she beats him with a bat, but not scared enough to have zipped it up? After 20 minutes of begging? Okay lol
She forgot she beat him up with a bat while he was in the suitcase. No way if he could have gotten out would he be able to beat her up..He was injured to badly
@@ichabodSandersAll lies!!!. I don't even believe she remembers recording him begging..She was totally drunk with an evil mindset.. She's that person that gets toasted and starts arguing and wanna fight..
He begged for his life. She laughed at him and went upstairs to leave him to die. GUILTY. She did it for revenge for “all he did to her” not out of fear for her life.
Why didn't the state do a simulation with someone the same height and weight as Jorge, and put them in the same size suitcase and see if they can get out?
I know the fella that said, he thinks she should be found not guilty😂 is most likely a defense attorney, and I know Vinny there needs to be someone with a dissenting opinion but that’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard.😂 actually laughable… it’s definitely a insult my intelligence
He’s as crazy as her lawyer!! There is no way she was in fear for her life, left it open that much, and just went off to bed. Not buying what she’s trying to sell.
The video doesn't show it was open from the side, I think she's not telling the truth. If she was in an abusive relationship she would have let him out knowing if he comes out on his own she's going to be in trouble. She let him die in there on purpose.
His hand coming out, (if that did actually happen), was necessary as the required 'overt act' to enable her to use self-defense. The judge approved it, fearing appeal. Wuss.
Brian Watkins just said on CourtTV "It takes two to tango so there's always some aggressiveness on both sides of each party when we're talking about a domestic violence case" . CourtTV, I expect better from you.
She zipped him up and then flipped the suitcase over. The weight of his body and the bigger part of the suitcase almost pinched the zipper making it almost impossible to open. By the time she flipped him back over, he was probably exhausted and running out of energy to get out. She knew that. She could see it. If she could take her phone, turn on the camera, point it and hit the record button, she could dialed 911. Better yet, she could have unzipped it. She was on a mission to torture him, and she tortured him to death.
She used the bat to get him back in bc she was afraid for her life if he got out he was going to kill her. So you really think she left the zipper open? No. Do you really think she thought he wouldn’t kill her the next day? He would be nicer later?
If it was open then how could he not breathe🙈...how could he not rip the suitcase open because we know suitcases tear easily...I think she zipped it more when she knew he was in a vulnerable position 🙃
SO BASICALLY THE DEFENSE WANTS YOU TO BELIEVE SHE LEFT A BIG ENOUGH OPENING FOR HIM TO GET OUT BUT I GUESS HE DECIDED TO STAY IN THE SUITCASE AND DIE....MAKE IT MAKE SENSE....ALSO HE HAS BRUISES ON HIM THAT WHILE HE WAS IN THE SUITCASE YOU BEAT HIM WITH A BAT...YET THIS WAS A GUY YOU WERE SO AFRAID OF THAT YOU WOULDN'T CALL THE POLICE TO GET HIM OUT OF YOUR PLACE...AND YOU WENT TO BED I GUESS WITH THE INTENTIONS OF OPENING IT UP IN THE MORNING FOR A GUY YOU WERE SO AFRAID OF THAT I WOULD THINK HE WOULD BE ANGRIER IN THE MORNING....HMMMM...BS!
We would all know from basic common sense how to zip someone up securely in a suitcase. It's not rocket science. Obviously you just use one zip and zip it to the opposite extremity. You wouldn't leave even a one inch gap at the corner. Those guests are naive. How can you possibly forgive Sarah for leaving that man to die in terror? Imagine the cramps that would set in, and the claustrophobia. She needs to be punished. She put his life in her own hands then abandoned him. She was therefore 100% responsible for his life, and then acted irresponsibly. Any reasonably intelligent person would know that involved a very high risk of death, or if not that of severe mental trauma. Maybe the defence should have claimed that Sarah is a m0r0n, or whatever the scientific term for that is. Maybe a grade-A student, but with no common sense.
WHAT ??? How do you come to that conclusion.. If she was scared for her life , when he was in the suitcase why not call the police. Her testimonial of the night was one of drinking and having fun , there was no fear. She is 100% guilty
@@steve10I said nothing about her being afraid of him. I also never said that she wasn't guilty. What I said was that I think that manslaughter is the more fitting charge here.
6:44 I think the same thing. I don’t think she wanted him dead. It was fun and it went to far cause she was afraid of repercussions when he got out. Cause he started by laughing and ended but being angry
SHE WASN'T AFRAID OF HIM OR SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN LET HIM OUT...ABUSED WOMEN WOULD NEVER GET THEIR ABUSER ANGRY LET ALONG LET THEM SIT IN A SUITCASE ALL NIGHT KNOWING THE CONSEQUENSES WHEN HE GOT OUT...SHE WAS NOT AFRAID OF HIM AT ALL.....I THINK SHE WAS THE ABUSER THAT'S WHY SHE DIDN'T EVEN HAVE CUSTODY OF HER OWN CHILD...SHE'S A NUT JOB
#CourtTV Catch up on FL v. #SarahBoone:
www.courttv.com/tag/sarah-boone/?
So she left it unzipped that much but it was self defense to protect herself? She can’t have it both ways 🙄
No way was it unzipped that much.
The co-hosts are delusional lol how was she scared of a man who weighed less than her and was begging for air for 20 minutes? She’s sadistic and loved hurting him; HE was HER victim.
If he could have gotten out, he would have. C’mon.
THAT'S WHAT I SAID SO BASICALLY THE DEFENSE WANTS FOLKS TO BELIEVE SHE LEFT AN OPENING WHERE HE COULD GET OUT BUT HE DECIDED TO STAY IN THEIR IN DIE...MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
GUILTY AS CHARGED!
His hand is reaching out to kill her!!!! BS. The whole story.
Ridiculous. He said he couldn’t breathe. She did nothing. Is that innocent or guilty?
"HMMMMM , i can't tell Vinnie , could you get in and show us , obviously if we go off home, we will promise to let you out tomorrow"
You have to remember that lawyers don't distinguish between lies and the truth. Only in what they can get people to believe.
We need to put the suitcase on Trial!
Sie is an adult person and has to take responsibility for her Action.
STOP JUST STOP YOU GUYS SHE LIED ,IS THAT TO HARD FOR YOU TO SEE SHE LIED!!!!
SHE DID IT BECAUSE SHE WANTED TO BE IN CONTROL AND HE GOT TIRED OF LISTENING TO HER DRUNK BUTT.
Wth difference does it make. He told her he couldn't breathe. He obviously was truthful. She left him. Thats truthful AND accurate..and torture. She said she didn't want him to get out and pushed his hand back in with a bat because she was afraid of him..yet in same breath say she assumed he could get out so she went to sleep. She didnt care one way or another what happened to him. She left him to die. And apparently with 2 of your panel members..thats okay. Interesting. So if a parent leaves their 2 yr old in a filled tub, pushes them back in when try to get out, then leave the room to go to sleep and say they assumed they could get out..that wouldn't be criminal either when they drown instead?? Same thing.
Very accurate. If she was THAT scared of him she’d have made sure he could never get out. But she simultaneously was too scared so she beats him with a bat, but not scared enough to have zipped it up? After 20 minutes of begging? Okay lol
What's amazing is that humans have mentally degenerated to the point this is a difficult debate.
She forgot she beat him up with a bat while he was in the suitcase. No way if he could have gotten out would he be able to beat her up..He was injured to badly
@@ichabodSandersAll lies!!!. I don't even believe she remembers recording him begging..She was totally drunk with an evil mindset.. She's that person that gets toasted and starts arguing and wanna fight..
THANKYOU! That’s what Ive been saying, she can’t have it both ways!
He begged for his life. She laughed at him and went upstairs to leave him to die. GUILTY. She did it for revenge for “all he did to her” not out of fear for her life.
Why didn't the state do a simulation with someone the same height and weight as Jorge, and put them in the same size suitcase and see if they can get out?
Or, they could do a digital representation.
No way y’all got the prop suitcase 😂😂😂
She’s a ‘DV’ victim. Prosecutor must be kind. GUILTY. GUILTY GUILTY.
I know the fella that said, he thinks she should be found not guilty😂 is most likely a defense attorney, and I know Vinny there needs to be someone with a dissenting opinion but that’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard.😂 actually laughable… it’s definitely a insult my intelligence
He’s as crazy as her lawyer!! There is no way she was in fear for her life, left it open that much, and just went off to bed. Not buying what she’s trying to sell.
In the videos and photos it's completely closed
The video doesn't show it was open from the side, I think she's not telling the truth. If she was in an abusive relationship she would have let him out knowing if he comes out on his own she's going to be in trouble. She let him die in there on purpose.
Wait till you hear the state's rebuttal it changes everything!
He was no threat and she still didn’t get help she went to bed for 12 hours.
She's guilty in my mind after watching the video she took
Also she beat his hands back into the case
How TF can you not push through a zipper?!
Why doesn't Vinnie climb in?! Then, they zip it up, and wait for the fireworks?!! 😅 😂 🤣
"She's telling the truth but it isn't accurate." Spoken like a true defense attorney. Good thing most juries have more sense than that.
Look at the video of Jorge in the suitcase! The zipper placement is NOT there. His hand coming out, or the overt act, didn't happen!
you should of invited a contortionist to your panel.
Vogue , strike a pose
She also turned the case over before she used the bat, so the opening would be on the bottom on the floor.
I agree sara is telling her own truth .
I think she will get off cuz ppl will fall for her antics. She was an abuser too. She was angry and wanted revenge and she was drunk.
i wanna see someone reenact the seen
What kind of idiot gets into a suitcase?
A drunk idiot
We don’t know that ! That’s her story.
The same kind that gets in a refrigerator
@@solraczevehc3761 so you think she forced him to get in? Like how?
His hand coming out, (if that did actually happen), was necessary as the required 'overt act' to enable her to use self-defense. The judge approved it, fearing appeal. Wuss.
Guilty 100%
Why are you guys arguing this testimony it's on video that suitcase was zipped tight and he suffocated and died 😮😮
Brian Watkins just said on CourtTV "It takes two to tango so there's always some aggressiveness on both sides of each party when we're talking about a domestic violence case" . CourtTV, I expect better from you.
She zipped him up and then flipped the suitcase over. The weight of his body and the bigger part of the suitcase almost pinched the zipper making it almost impossible to open. By the time she flipped him back over, he was probably exhausted and running out of energy to get out. She knew that. She could see it. If she could take her phone, turn on the camera, point it and hit the record button, she could dialed 911. Better yet, she could have unzipped it. She was on a mission to torture him, and she tortured him to death.
The judge moving so much he’s silently commenting to himself yes more bs mmhmmm yes the jury ain’t having it either miss boone.
Thats not just a suitcase. That is a tool to make your man a better man ...if he wakes up in the morning.
If it was that far open, he wouldn't have died from suffocation point blank
Don’t believe they played hide and seek - I believe she was more abusive to him than he was to her ……… she is cold and heartless even sober
Owens took it on for the money .
She used the bat to get him back in bc she was afraid for her life if he got out he was going to kill her. So you really think she left the zipper open? No.
Do you really think she thought he wouldn’t kill her the next day? He would be nicer later?
I do not believe this at all, He would have been able to get out. I think she sat on top of it and zipped him in.
If it was open then how could he not breathe🙈...how could he not rip the suitcase open because we know suitcases tear easily...I think she zipped it more when she knew he was in a vulnerable position 🙃
Crazy case, excuse the pun
This prosecutor is not that good
I'd like to know how many of those bruses are from her being drunk and falling down.
That picture of her black eye looked like make up
He was drunk though. When you are drunk you loose coordination.
SO BASICALLY THE DEFENSE WANTS YOU TO BELIEVE SHE LEFT A BIG ENOUGH OPENING FOR HIM TO GET OUT BUT I GUESS HE DECIDED TO STAY IN THE SUITCASE AND DIE....MAKE IT MAKE SENSE....ALSO HE HAS BRUISES ON HIM THAT WHILE HE WAS IN THE SUITCASE YOU BEAT HIM WITH A BAT...YET THIS WAS A GUY YOU WERE SO AFRAID OF THAT YOU WOULDN'T CALL THE POLICE TO GET HIM OUT OF YOUR PLACE...AND YOU WENT TO BED I GUESS WITH THE INTENTIONS OF OPENING IT UP IN THE MORNING FOR A GUY YOU WERE SO AFRAID OF THAT I WOULD THINK HE WOULD BE ANGRIER IN THE MORNING....HMMMM...BS!
We would all know from basic common sense how to zip someone up securely in a suitcase. It's not rocket science. Obviously you just use one zip and zip it to the opposite extremity. You wouldn't leave even a one inch gap at the corner. Those guests are naive.
How can you possibly forgive Sarah for leaving that man to die in terror? Imagine the cramps that would set in, and the claustrophobia. She needs to be punished. She put his life in her own hands then abandoned him. She was therefore 100% responsible for his life, and then acted irresponsibly. Any reasonably intelligent person would know that involved a very high risk of death, or if not that of severe mental trauma. Maybe the defence should have claimed that Sarah is a m0r0n, or whatever the scientific term for that is. Maybe a grade-A student, but with no common sense.
I feel like you're being a bit obtuse on this one. She didn't intend to murder him. Manslaughter.
WHAT ??? How do you come to that conclusion..
If she was scared for her life , when he was in the suitcase why not call the police.
Her testimonial of the night was one of drinking and having fun , there was no fear.
She is 100% guilty
@@steve10I said nothing about her being afraid of him. I also never said that she wasn't guilty. What I said was that I think that manslaughter is the more fitting charge here.
Nice clickbait. Hope no one was dumb enough to believe you had the suitcase
Not guilty of murder obviously.
6:44 I think the same thing. I don’t think she wanted him dead. It was fun and it went to far cause she was afraid of repercussions when he got out. Cause he started by laughing and ended but being angry
Ya I agree she murdered him
SHE WASN'T AFRAID OF HIM OR SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN LET HIM OUT...ABUSED WOMEN WOULD NEVER GET THEIR ABUSER ANGRY LET ALONG LET THEM SIT IN A SUITCASE ALL NIGHT KNOWING THE CONSEQUENSES WHEN HE GOT OUT...SHE WAS NOT AFRAID OF HIM AT ALL.....I THINK SHE WAS THE ABUSER THAT'S WHY SHE DIDN'T EVEN HAVE CUSTODY OF HER OWN CHILD...SHE'S A NUT JOB