love the thumbnail, really strikes that balance between your OG thumbnails, and making it more clear that this is a Squad video. i hope it is what you were looking for
In defense of the warrior, especially the UA version: They are so god damm tanky. Infantry will have a hard time killing you. british mechanised so often wrecks in Mutaha and other maps, simply because a single squad even with a HAT will struggle to finish off a warrior, while the gunner, drinking tea, kills off the squad. Also the main gun just slaps with it's damage. But in the end: We all want the CTAS back..
PMC on Tallil INV defense is actually pretty good unless the server allows for main camping. Tons of ATGMs and 4 HATs with the best long range infantry.
I think there is another round with the Brits on Talil. Maybe you remember the round when we mechanised pushed onto an enemy FOB in Hangars. That felt awesome from the ground.
The Warrior does have some nice things about it. I would take it over a BMP-1 and maybe even the MIL BMP-2. It is super tanky, doesn't have an ammor rack, has a good gun for killing inf and light armor and don't forget you reload the ammo super quick.
@@duckrikini the TOW in the game and irl uses SACLOS guidance which means it requires visual contact with an infrared beacon on the missile to detect its position and use the guidance wires to issue corrections to its flight path to guide it toward the centre of the optic. so both irl and in game IR countermeasures such as smoke would disrupt the missiles guidance
I’d honestly rather prefer the Warrior over the BMP-1. It also depends on the situation say if your fighting a faction without armor capabilities then I’ll take a BMP for the amount of high-explosive damage it’s able to put out but the warrior is able to reasonably brawl with enemy armor from long distances compared to the BMP
@@ittybittyputtymitty you are complaining that the Turkish IFVs have a slow rate of fire when they have the same gun as the LAVs and Bradley versus the Warrior?
Can`t believe you actualy did it :D
Thanks for playing but next time please don`t make it sound like I died xD
Lmao I thought you passed away or sum
@@Panchoproductions2069 Wut why? Just wanted to see some good underdog IFV gameplay... don`t we all kinda root for them
The "In Memory of" left the impression that you bit the bullet
rip
IN MEMORY OF BOBBAY RIP
"terrible equipment will make your victory all the more impressive!" - MoD, probably
love the thumbnail, really strikes that balance between your OG thumbnails, and making it more clear that this is a Squad video. i hope it is what you were looking for
In defense of the warrior, especially the UA version:
They are so god damm tanky. Infantry will have a hard time killing you. british mechanised so often wrecks in Mutaha and other maps, simply because a single squad even with a HAT will struggle to finish off a warrior, while the gunner, drinking tea, kills off the squad.
Also the main gun just slaps with it's damage.
But in the end: We all want the CTAS back..
Scimitar is where it's at. Quick, nimble and completely made out of tissue paper.
If it was 5 tickets it would be crazy good. For 10 its not worth using.
@@ninety3premiumit is 5 tickets
its so strong!
Just use ambush tactics to the max and focus on killing enemy turrets.
@@babyclifford1759 When did they update it to 5 tickets?
@@babyclifford1759 Scim is 10
PMC on Talil is one of the worst picks I’ve ever seen
PMC on Tallil INV defense is actually pretty good unless the server allows for main camping. Tons of ATGMs and 4 HATs with the best long range infantry.
I think there is another round with the Brits on Talil. Maybe you remember the round when we mechanised pushed onto an enemy FOB in Hangars. That felt awesome from the ground.
Now i need more CTAS rampage videos after this. Don't see enough of those anymore.
It's funny how the brits have both the best IFV in the game and also the worse, truly a british moment
What’s the best IFV? The 40mm one?
Babe, wake up! Dog man sips tea!
The Warrior does have some nice things about it. I would take it over a BMP-1 and maybe even the MIL BMP-2. It is super tanky, doesn't have an ammor rack, has a good gun for killing inf and light armor and don't forget you reload the ammo super quick.
I have over 60 kills with just one Bradley, and I drive it alone.
Do you think they should bring back the CTAS ?
11:27 unlike real life, smoke launcher will not effect any wire guided systems. Only laser guided ones. Thats why you get hit
Ookay, I'm warming up to the thumbnails.
Can you do another video on the silly blue truck? It'd be funny to see it flanking enemies despite it sticking out like thumb on most maps
11:27 i think the TOW got through because your smoke burst too high leaving a gap below it for the missile to track through
PMC TOW is wired not laser, smoke or not it will still go through. they should have moved if they wanted to dodge it
@@duckrikini the TOW in the game and irl uses SACLOS guidance which means it requires visual contact with an infrared beacon on the missile to detect its position and use the guidance wires to issue corrections to its flight path to guide it toward the centre of the optic. so both irl and in game IR countermeasures such as smoke would disrupt the missiles guidance
I don’t know why British armored vehicles in games always seem underwhelming hmmm
fancy seeing u here, fellow henki enjoyer too i see
Love Warriors, especially into militia. real shitty ifv vs shitty ifv hours. great fun.
510 aint even bad...the 107 is where the pain really is. No clue why they deleted the CTAS since it was the only IFV that truly was good.
The warrior is my BMP1
I’d honestly rather prefer the Warrior over the BMP-1. It also depends on the situation say if your fighting a faction without armor capabilities then I’ll take a BMP for the amount of high-explosive damage it’s able to put out but the warrior is able to reasonably brawl with enemy armor from long distances compared to the BMP
If you are hull down in a bmp-1 you are damn near invincible. That thing is impossible to see with its low profile
bro I need to get on RB more man I used to play a lot on there love your armor stuff to I'm a big time armor player to
Thumbnail is spot on!
KEEP UP THE AMAZING CONTENT, LOVE YOU HENKI
Bro I literally hesitate to face you while playing in RB. You're acting like a beast which destroys everything in its path...
warrior is the best IFV and i'm sick of pretending it isn't!
they may get shitty equipment but fuck do they get alot of it, like yeah a bmp-2 can out kill a cimitar but can it out kill 3 of them?
No I think it’s pretty good
It's okay to be wrong
Worst IFV is Turkish ACV or Pars. No armor, no speed, no hp and slow rate of fire
@@ittybittyputtymitty you are complaining that the Turkish IFVs have a slow rate of fire when they have the same gun as the LAVs and Bradley versus the Warrior?
Now do the Scimitar.
just close your eyes and pretend this is a scimitar video
17:15 Tasty
Ahh morning vids my fav
Dude its 6.30 pm....
Crazy sleep schedule
@@cpt_brexit2193 yeah!
@@TheLillerO have you considered that other timezones exist
@@cripple9860 No! There is only one!
mid vehicle banger vid
I had my most kills in any game 1 manning this thing lol... 3 am al basrah invasion, 168 downs, 115 kills...
damn most kills my gunner got was 106
yeah, if you stay still and sit at a distance (something drivers don’t want to do) it is a menace.
I don’t know why British armored vehicles in games always seem underwhelming hmmm