The more I listen to Peter Z the more I'm convinced that he has some good overarching ideas and insights but the same themes seem to be repeated, aka, the textile story that has surfaced in many videos. His videos seem to be clip excerpts from either an interview or speaking engagement with no preamble AND you come away with a feeling that somebody that works for him just slices and dices excerpts to flood TH-cam for cash flow AND here you have a guy that really likes to hear himself talk.
Because the way they are headed is not self-sustainable (or otherwise) and the talks are about the impact on world economy and products when that happens.
If my comment is held for moderation, please read all of it. It does not make sense to remove it. I spent a lot of time writing it and none of it is anything but pragmatic.
I can't believe what you said about Trump! Now I doubt your political opinions and alleged knowledge on the current events! I will rarely watch your videos from now on!😮
Total nonsense .What person who has been doing crap boring jobs for decades till they are 65 ( which is 90% of the working population ) would want to work for another 10 years . Only people in cushy and satisfying jobs talk or promote this working longer .
Guessing that if people over 65 were given worthwhile tax reduction incentives to work past 65 many would continue to work at least part time especially since most baby boomers have not saved enough money for a comfortable retirement. This would help stimulate the economy by holding the line on wage increases somewhat and insure that corporate profits r protected a bit more. Of course corporate profits and hence reinvestment r a necessary ingredient and can potentially partially make up for the loss in tax proceeds the government receives.
The more I listen to Peter Z the more I'm convinced that he has some good overarching ideas and insights but the same themes seem to be repeated, aka, the textile story that has surfaced in many videos. His videos seem to be clip excerpts from either an interview or speaking engagement with no preamble AND you come away with a feeling that somebody that works for him just slices and dices excerpts to flood TH-cam for cash flow AND here you have a guy that really likes to hear himself talk.
Predicting the future is precarious at best.
Clickbait: what did any of this have to do with “Russia on the Brink”?
Because Zeihan is a huge s**tstain.
What do you expect from Peter Pan, he likes to hear himself talk 🙃
Why is it that literally nothing this guy says comes to fruition?
What did this video have to do with Russia? Clickbait title.
Because the way they are headed is not self-sustainable (or otherwise) and the talks are about the impact on world economy and products when that happens.
i dont know who's behind this, but Peter says, "we're in the first days of the Biden administration." What?
If my comment is held for moderation, please read all of it. It does not make sense to remove it. I spent a lot of time writing it and none of it is anything but pragmatic.
Medication will not erase ageism.you will hav we to do something to get rid of ageism
Wrong title
Can the corn with all 8 essential amino acids
This guy is like chicken little talking about the sky.
Peter Zeihan is generally wrong 😂
Just curious, what has he been wrong about?
@@MLB1212
Read the comment below ⬇️
He only has to be right once... And eventually he will be since he does nothing else but talk...
@@davidgreen449 what is it about PZ that u fundamentally disagree with?
@@gorankovacevic673 what has he been wrong about?
I can't believe what you said about Trump! Now I doubt your political opinions and alleged knowledge on the current events! I will rarely watch your videos from now on!😮
I have to disagree. It’s going to be sudden and horrific.
Total nonsense .What person who has been doing crap boring jobs for decades till they are 65 ( which is 90% of the working population ) would want to work for another 10 years . Only people in cushy and satisfying jobs talk or promote this working longer .
Guessing that if people over 65 were given worthwhile tax reduction incentives to work past 65 many would continue to work at least part time especially since most baby boomers have not saved enough money for a comfortable retirement. This would help stimulate the economy by holding the line on wage increases somewhat and insure that corporate profits r protected a bit more. Of course corporate profits and hence reinvestment r a necessary ingredient and can potentially partially make up for the loss in tax proceeds the government receives.