TUTORIAL - How to Use Biblindex

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @Cahrub
    @Cahrub 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    It wouldn't be a Christian website without Papyrus font.

  • @matthewschraith8434
    @matthewschraith8434 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Bro this will make my studies so much better, thank you!

    • @TheOtherPaul
      @TheOtherPaul  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A pleasure!

  • @koyo3376
    @koyo3376 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This tool rules! I wish I knew about this earlier.

    • @hll97fr16
      @hll97fr16 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is quite new I think. But yeah.

  • @LoveForTheWord
    @LoveForTheWord 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Learned about this tool (or something like it) when I read through Beckwith's "Old Testament Canon of the New Testament Church." I had fumbled around with how to use it myself some time ago.
    A tutorial I watched said that you could click on the names of the works (or the authors themselves) and you would be directed to some resource page. I never got that to work though. I was always directed to a broken link. Google works just as well though! Thanks for the pro tip on the Book / Chapter references. I never really figured out how to parse that information.
    One thing I've used Biblindex for thus far is to demonstrate the interest of ancient fathers in passages shedding light on the person of Christ over passages used to argue for a specific understanding of justification. For example, in the first couple centuries after Christ, John 1:1 had several hundred hits and Rom 3:28 had a couple dozen, or something crazy like that.

  • @hll97fr16
    @hll97fr16 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you very much for this very useful video.

  • @cyrusnelsen986
    @cyrusnelsen986 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Catena is also a great resource. Does the same thing with a better UI.

  • @JimmySonny
    @JimmySonny 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Amazing thing to see technology created for the glory of God. Here from Discord.

  • @SouthPadreTony
    @SouthPadreTony 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you very much!

  • @SethGullion
    @SethGullion 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is definitely going to help me in my research!!! Thanks Paul!!!

  • @muppetpoppet216
    @muppetpoppet216 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent. Bookmarked.

  • @AbsurdScandal
    @AbsurdScandal 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why isn't Augustine among the ancient writers? I just noticed that - they don't include Augustine's works in their corpus.

    • @ImNotSureWho
      @ImNotSureWho 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, I'm confused too

    • @TheOtherPaul
      @TheOtherPaul  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Just saw this too, RIP. It's an ongoing project tho so he'll eventually be in there:
      www.biblindex.org/en/prospects

    • @AbsurdScandal
      @AbsurdScandal 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheOtherPaul Hope it grows bigger! And hope it also eventually links to the actual works cited as much as possible too, so one doesn't have to manually check the reference off site!

    • @TheOtherPaul
      @TheOtherPaul  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AbsurdScandal Google ain't hard 😎

  • @gamerjj777
    @gamerjj777 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you brother greatly helpful.

  • @thomassiharath9078
    @thomassiharath9078 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Based method

  • @laiquende9971
    @laiquende9971 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They use the papyrus font? I'm skeptical but I'll keep watching.

    • @TheOtherPaul
      @TheOtherPaul  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Don't disrespect papyrus here bro you're asking for trouble

    • @laiquende9971
      @laiquende9971 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Okay it's pretty cool. Thanks for the video! (Biblindex that is, I stand by what I said about Papyrus)

  • @AnglicanFish
    @AnglicanFish 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you wise Elder Paul, sad you didn’t have Arthur Morgan do this video

    • @TheOtherPaul
      @TheOtherPaul  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Next time habibi

  • @damiandziedzic23
    @damiandziedzic23 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Biblindex is fine but it’s lacking a lot 😢

    • @TheOtherPaul
      @TheOtherPaul  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The core functionality is solid and is a game changer in itself

    • @damiandziedzic23
      @damiandziedzic23 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheOtherPaulIn the past I used it myself. Now I would say it’s more efficient and preferable to combine Thesaurus Linguae Graecae (TLG) search with Corpus Corporum project for Latin.

    • @AbsurdScandal
      @AbsurdScandal 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheOtherPaul One thing which would make it so much better than it already is, is if it had quick links to all the author's works it cites. Searching them by yourself can be tedious, especially if they're not in English or by an obscure author.

    • @davidclark5618
      @davidclark5618 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AbsurdScandal I experienced this too and it is tedius. The databse is based on the quotations from Biblia Patristica which often has different book and chapter divisions than newer translations. The book and chapter divisions in BIBLIndex do correspond, however, to the TLG (thesarus lingua graecae). So depending on how good hour greek is you can just read it on there or get a general feel for what its saying and then find the section in modern translations. same goes for patrologia latina.