DNA is a book, not a blueprint. Specifically not a blueprint, in fact. A blueprint is a 2D representation of a 3D model, like what an engineer or architect would use. DNA is a 3D molecule read from left to right, with nucleic acids that repeat like letters in a sentence.
No.. it's the chemistry that differs but not in sense of laws but in metabolic pathways and gene expression.. Not physics it's the same laws which governs everything to us to the universe... Molecular biophysics is more of modelling and using physics to understand physiology functions.. Biochemistry involves physical techniques so it looks like molecular biophysics is more of biochemistry..
Keeping the doors shut and not allowing systems to operate together and communicate effectively actually delays progress in name of individual development. This is one sad contradiction of the scientific world. Biophysics and biochemistry do exist. Sharing prizes represent progression and open minded thinking, which apparently is not a trait of scientists' mind. I am a student of Neuroscience, it simply embraces the three in concert. Yet, even a supposedly smart person such as this doctor is so blinded by the thought of prizes and personal success that it shows how the world of sciences completely fails to see that closure causes isolation, exclusion, and it impairs further general development. Supposedly, discoveries are meant to help cure people, open minds and inspire new generations.
Interdisciplinary approach is the best way for learning, i only follow the idea of Meistro's joke with another one. I'm SLP and audiology student so i understand how physics and biology work together
HE IS NOT A BIOLOGIST NOR A BIOPHYSICIST BUT A PHYCIST WHO STUDIED BIOLOGY HERE AND THERTE AN DNOW HAS BEEN GIVE SOMEONE ELSES' JOB BECAUSE OF THE NEPOTISM IN THE ACADEMIA. THE LEVELS OF IGNORANT PREJUDICE in the lecture is absolutely disgusting.
biology is not so easy, but its definitely easier than physics! I like how people who study physics and chemistry can be able to do deep down into biology while the reverse is not so true. Biologists are more specialised and its harder to go backward into a bigger field like chemistry or physics.
Because they use chemical tool as well as physical tool to investigate. We can say Biology is a branch or more accurate a specialised part from Chemistry or Physics. So to be honest, Neural Chem is just a branch of Chem, only different in the fact that one deals with biological stuff while chem is more general, deal with everything! Biology is still easier than Physics and Chem though! We apply Chem and Physic rules Bio! Chem and Physics are foundation for Bio!
Well, to me, its easier as Im a Biochemist and I find Biology and Chemistry are really absorbable! But Physics is really tough, especially when dealing with relativity and quantum mechanics which are among the hardest concepts in scientific world!
yeah, but i mean in general, a lot people find biology is much more easier than physics or chemistry. I mean in general population. Lots of people can learn biology or chemistry themselves by self-reading textbooks but not many people can read a physics textbook about quantum mechanics themselves without asking anyone or without attending any lecture or study group. I dont say there is no one, but i say less people can do it!
yes, physics and maths are much more abstract than biology. Physics derived from Maths which has already famous for its abstraction. Biology has more memorising stuff. But obviously, memorising stuff isnt going to make u become a scientist. Like other scientists, we do have to think and derive from what we have known before (which is all the pathways we need to remember) to investigate new things. We do have to learn physics and use our creation to design experiments. But the abstraction is not as big as physics. We deal with small stuff that our eyes hardly can see and we have to design expt. to indirectly observe them, but with physics, you have to deal with stuff u dont even know if they are exist or not, dark matters, dark energy, all kinds of subatomic particles,..
Horrible. The level of separationism among scientific fields that he promotes so blindly is the exact problem that delays development of a new vaccine for instance. Why did I think we've made any progress?
The most incredibly absurd intro to biophysics ever heard. Yeah sure study biology a few minutes before going to sleep cause being a PhD physics student obviously gives you omniscient powers! And that discriminatory statement about physicists being smart cause they're elitists and prejudiced. As a matter of fact, that's why science progression is so slow and NEVER about true discoveries nor patients' best interests. Honestly disgusted. Truthfully. NT
Because even the smartest elite so called physicist can't really figure out things in biology... Mathematical physiology for eg.. We could have applied physics Equations to understand physiology but at some it becomes really challenging because we can't isolate things and number of distinct variables are too much.. Every door opens something new in every research..
![เบิ้ล ปทุมราช - สาวสอง ( มีมี่ของอ้าย ) ft. ตาต้า,ต้องเต [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mqlMjnP08XI/mqdefault.jpg)
open sourcing science, like homebrew computer club in 70s, is the key to understand complexities of living things and develop AI...
Agreed, if technology exerts greater complexity, then it can also serve to explain th complexities
Understanding life is the greatest challenge of the twenty first century. Understanding energy is the most important challenge of the 38th century.
Have you read "The Last Question" by Isaac Asimov?
loved how the camera zooms in on his cut out like a poet from 16:12 - he dropped the chalk! lol
I love this lecturer alrdy haha
This is a pretty awesome lecture.
If you are dumb, racist, and narrow m minded, know nothing about biology and genetic research, the perhaps...
DNA is a book, not a blueprint. Specifically not a blueprint, in fact. A blueprint is a 2D representation of a 3D model, like what an engineer or architect would use. DNA is a 3D molecule read from left to right, with nucleic acids that repeat like letters in a sentence.
That was beautiful. Thank you for that Yasmeen.
Dna on textbook is blueprint of actual dna...
Every body defines biophysics differently. There is confusion and no clarity about this subject. Molecular biophysics is more of biochemistry
No.. it's the chemistry that differs but not in sense of laws but in metabolic pathways and gene expression.. Not physics it's the same laws which governs everything to us to the universe...
Molecular biophysics is more of modelling and using physics to understand physiology functions.. Biochemistry involves physical techniques so it looks like molecular biophysics is more of biochemistry..
19min starts getting in to it
Very interesting ..... Very interesting indeed
DNA and other genetic material is more important to understanding time than huge energy reactions.
I know this is old but would you be able to elaborate on this? Or link me some resources on how dna relates to time? Thank you
no
@@gliese4363 yes
where are the rest of these lectures? seems this is the first of the series
Keeping the doors shut and not allowing systems to operate together and communicate effectively actually delays progress in name of individual development. This is one sad contradiction of the scientific world. Biophysics and biochemistry do exist. Sharing prizes represent progression and open minded thinking, which apparently is not a trait of scientists' mind.
I am a student of Neuroscience, it simply embraces the three in concert. Yet, even a supposedly smart person such as this doctor is so blinded by the thought of prizes and personal success that it shows how the world of sciences completely fails to see that closure causes isolation, exclusion, and it impairs further general development. Supposedly, discoveries are meant to help cure people, open minds and inspire new generations.
are science lawyers a thing?
@@Monksees patent lawyers are a thing if thats what u mean
@@Monksees Actually yes.
Finally biologists who know what a calculator is for! (hint: not paperweights)....
Only noobs need calculators...
Finally physicists who know about autopoiesis
Interdisciplinary approach is the best way for learning, i only follow the idea of Meistro's joke with another one. I'm SLP and audiology student so i understand how physics and biology work together
*****
Good for you you scumbag. I'm a garbage collector. So i beat all of you!
HE IS NOT A BIOLOGIST NOR A BIOPHYSICIST BUT A PHYCIST WHO STUDIED BIOLOGY HERE AND THERTE AN DNOW HAS BEEN GIVE SOMEONE ELSES' JOB BECAUSE OF THE NEPOTISM IN THE ACADEMIA. THE LEVELS OF IGNORANT PREJUDICE in the lecture is absolutely disgusting.
I don't think time really matters to nonliving things.
Like rocks
levi voils time doesn't matter to rocks
levi voils or clouds
Sorry ***** this stuff gets me excited.
biology is not so easy, but its definitely easier than physics!
I like how people who study physics and chemistry can be able to do deep down into biology while the reverse is not so true. Biologists are more specialised and its harder to go backward into a bigger field like chemistry or physics.
Because they use chemical tool as well as physical tool to investigate. We can say Biology is a branch or more accurate a specialised part from Chemistry or Physics. So to be honest, Neural Chem is just a branch of Chem, only different in the fact that one deals with biological stuff while chem is more general, deal with everything! Biology is still easier than Physics and Chem though! We apply Chem and Physic rules Bio! Chem and Physics are foundation for Bio!
Biology isn't easier than physics. Not to mention biology involves a lot of biochemistry and biophysics.
Well, to me, its easier as Im a Biochemist and I find Biology and Chemistry are really absorbable! But Physics is really tough, especially when dealing with relativity and quantum mechanics which are among the hardest concepts
in scientific world!
yeah, but i mean in general, a lot people find biology is much more easier than physics or chemistry. I mean in general population. Lots of people can learn biology or chemistry themselves by self-reading textbooks but not many people can read a physics textbook about quantum mechanics themselves without asking anyone or without attending any lecture or study group. I dont say there is no one, but i say less people can do it!
yes, physics and maths are much more abstract than biology. Physics derived from Maths which has already famous for its abstraction.
Biology has more memorising stuff. But obviously, memorising stuff isnt going to make u become a scientist. Like other scientists, we do have to think and derive from what we have known before (which is all the pathways we need to remember) to investigate new things. We do have to learn physics and use our creation to design experiments. But the abstraction is not as big as physics. We deal with small stuff that our eyes hardly can see and we have to design expt. to indirectly observe them, but with physics, you have to deal with stuff u dont even know if they are exist or not, dark matters, dark energy, all kinds of subatomic particles,..
Hmm these lecture seems interesting
why is there little documanteries on this? i hope BBC makes one
Peter Parker studies this, so here i am...
Horrible. The level of separationism among scientific fields that he promotes so blindly is the exact problem that delays development of a new vaccine for instance. Why did I think we've made any progress?
The most incredibly absurd intro to biophysics ever heard. Yeah sure study biology a few minutes before going to sleep cause being a PhD physics student obviously gives you omniscient powers! And that discriminatory statement about physicists being smart cause they're elitists and prejudiced. As a matter of fact, that's why science progression is so slow and NEVER about true discoveries nor patients' best interests. Honestly disgusted. Truthfully. NT
Because even the smartest elite so called physicist can't really figure out things in biology... Mathematical physiology for eg.. We could have applied physics Equations to understand physiology but at some it becomes really challenging because we can't isolate things and number of distinct variables are too much.. Every door opens something new in every research..