41 years old and beating the two world championship contenders to pole then winning the race after spending 2 years in heavier indycars (becoming champion). One of the all time great drivers.
@@posniknelb6114 Ayrton had more than double the pole number than Mansell. No way was Mansell quicker than Senna (to be fair no one was). All other things considered one can´t really compare (to many variables at stake), but concerning speed it was not even close. NO driver back then was as quick as Senna - in pure speed and natural talent - when driving those cars. And by a margin. His pole percentage back then (on "modern era cars") does not lie.
Mansell: one of great talents of motorrracing. Incredible talent. Great personality.Determination and commitment. True Legend. Happy to see him in action. Long live Nigel!
Brilliant lap from Nigel - such skill and commitment even at 41 years old! Was always a top qualifier. Even managed 8-8 against Prost in 1990 with the team openly prioritising Alain.
Prost was notorious for setting up his car for race conditions rather than qualifying. So its pretty bad that Mansell only managed 8-8 against Prost. Thats why Prost is often outqualified by Senna but he would have much better race pace.
Phantom5611 Senna dominated prost in qualifying because Prost knew it was a waste of energy trying to beat him in qualifying, he employed Lauda’s tactics that were used against himself in 84
@Firstname Lastname Ha ha, you seem to have a problem there with Mansell I see! Let it go, he may have had a more successful life than you, but he is long retired now...
@Firstname Lastname Please read what I said... You said that Mansell was "overrated". I said, looking at his achievements, that he wasn't. I never said he was as good as Prost or Senna - though he certainly could be every bit as fast. Just not the complete package that they were
Mansell should have won his first title in 1986, when Williams were by a mile superior to McLaren's. Instead of what he battled with his teammate. As a result Prost won, while Mansell & Piquet lost. Same in 1987, he had the car to win, but Piquet was still there. Anyway like him or not he was a very good driver, but lacked the ability or will to set up properly a car, you can't just hop in and drive. This is the key difference between title count, at some point you have to make one with the car. Should have retired in style after this race won, but messed it up totally.
+X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X Indeed, amazing reaction and intelligence to react and spin the car to avoid collision. His save at Imola 1990 is the best of all time imo
+dinterful I belive it is, judging by the white helmet with a stripe of some sort (should be black-red-gold) on the side. Furthermore, Schumacher crashed at this corner in practice and in the race, if I remember Adelaide correctly ;)
also check spa 1993 with senna in eu rouge or how is spelt :)mansel and senna was the last great f1 champs and i feel lucky i was there to see them fight live many times !!!
I'm a huge Prost fan as well but Mansell had a lot of bad luck. Amazing that he won in 94. He would have been world champion in 93 had Williams not been so stupid. The car was built for Mansell and he was racing better and better
Just shows the talent of the man, didn't really go testing and wasn't interested in fine tuning the set-up. Here he was an old man and part-time racing driver besting one of the best of all time. If he was around in today's era he would have given them all nightmares!
As an american,and road racer first and foremost,I was looking to F1 to for s racing career and still,I was Nigel fan from way back and loved his personality,one thing I didn't know about him till reasontly was he came to williams as an engineer,and wonder what exact kind and if there was more in depth interviews where he talks more about starting at Williams,I know that background really helped him,I don't possess the academic train but like most itailians I look at technology from the position of a constructed,it really more of genetic problem I can never look at anything superficially...thanks for posting video of one my all time favorite drivers,probably the one...
Nigel went to Lotus as a test driver in 1980. He was very much an established F1 driver by the time he went to Willaims to partner Nelson Piquet for 1985.
I would like to have seen Nigel in that car from the start of the season and Ayrton in the other Benneton partner to Shumacher, that would have been very interesting.
@@chriswebb1148 Schumacher always driven 'how he did'. Look at 1995, when the Williams was better in the first half of the season and Michael still blew them away.
It wasnt that bad. The Williams had a massive power advantage over the Ford and was very quick but hard to drive. By Imola, the car was already much better and by mid season, the best overall package.
Hill had less issues than Ayrton in that car. Seemed like a bad marriage from the start for Senna, he had problems with it, especially with the cockpit, size and position of the steering wheel. In one of his earlier tests during pre-season he told reporters that the car was "undrivable". But the FW16 was quick and had lots of potential, it wasn't bad, just had to be fine tuned.
Good video but it must be stressed that this was only Friday's first qualifying session. The next day, Mansell recorded a pole lap which was almost a full second faster than Messieurs Hill & Schumacher, and that was the one that truly counted!
la Pole Position che conferma, senza ogni dubbio, il gran Pilota che è stato Nigel Mansell!! ... questa monoposto non era assolutamente la migliore del lotto e lui la portò in cima alla griglia lo stesso!!
Hill si è giocato il titolo con la Williams. Forse non era il pacchetto completo che fù la Benetton di quel periodo, ma la FW16 era comunque un'ottima vettura e minimo la seconda miglior auto in pista.
@@livingbeing1113 concordo perfettamente con te. Hill è stato irruento, la miglior vettura quell'anno era la Benetton, ma per come si era messa quella gara, se avesse atteso un istante, avrebbe avuto il mondiale in tasca. Schumacher, viceversa è stato di una scorrettezza assoluta e la Fia ha dormito.-
Yes he was fast but old :) And not as talented as Senna or new generation Schumacher. Besides if Senna couldn't work out in first races how to make the FW16 set ups better, and we was a master at that, i can hardly see Mansell doing better. Just see what happened in 95, off to Hakkinen by 3sec in McLaren. When he managed to get in ;)
@@heexxi i am sorry heexxi but you can’t argue the 95 season for Mansell. It’s just nonsense And he was in my opinion better than Senna and indisputably more fair-play in head to head battle ( not difficult with Senna)
@@TheUlysse2000 How can he could be better that Senna, just see title and win count :) . In 5 years of F1 Mansell scored 1 pole no win. Senna scored 29 poles, 14 wins and one title. You can't seriously say he was better. I agree he was a spectacular driver, no doubt. In 94 he done 4 races as a reminder, 2 DNF, France and Europe, 4th in Japan Therefore certainly not a good choice for 95, or championship contender. He should have won 86/87 titles hands down, Williams-Honda were unbeatable at times. And with a more reliable car 91 because the Williams were on top again.
@@heexxi so you choose the period of time you want right? Ok in 1992 Mansell had 9 victories and one title. What about Senna? In 86 Senna ruined 2 races for Mansell, Brazil and Belgium. You know Mansell was really the man to beat between 86 and 92 and he was very very unlucky. Others often won because of Mansell retirements
@@TheUlysse2000 Mansell ruined many races too, and his 1987 title on his own by wanting pole in Japan and crashed, had to withdraw the two races left handing the title to Piquet. I agree he won in 1992, but that's his 1st and only title. As i said and i recon he was talented, he should have won 86/87/91. 88 Williams lost Honda engine to McLaren ( 15 wins/16 races ) the car was no match to others. 89/90 at Ferrari ? 89 soso, 90 well Prost simply walked over him, and was nearly titled in 90 ( Mansell did not help much as a teammate either watch Portugal ). Unlucky is and excuse for losers. He was certainly not the man to beat , these were McLarens Prost and Senna. I'm watching F1 since 1984, and if you ask any driver / commentator of these years, if Mansell was superior in any ways to any otherr, well they will just say NO. As a finish i had to quote Mr Mc Enroe : YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS ;)
Taking it over from Senna and what a incredible pole from Mansell. He was the indy world champion and f1 champion at the same time! What a incredible racing driver! Frank Williams why didn't you let Senna and Mansell fight it out in 1992! Lastly launch control and the ban and that dirty take out at the end... Bennetton and those Cheat..ers get what they deserve..both of them! Karma comes back.. Literally. Miss you Ayrton
Nesse tempo o esporte era paixão e emoção, ex: Mansel, Jordan, Pelé, Maradona, Hortência, etc. De 1s anos pra cá só interessa o R€$ULTADO, ex: Schumi, Messi, Neymar, Lebron, Bolt...
assurdo che in williams abbiano aperto il cockpit per permettere alle mani di girare solo dopo la morte di senna. era una modifica che si poteva fare già dopo i test invernali
pulse 'n' think to be fair, the car was setup to Schumacher’s liking, which is very pointy. Herbert didn’t necessarily like that setup, probably none of Schumi’s other Benetton teammates liked it either considering their relative lack of speed.
Firstname Lastname that’s rather harsh. None of them are all time greats, but not slouches either. Herbert and Brundle are Le Mans winners, and Hill is a World Champion, so none of them are complete hacks like a DeCesaris.
@Firstname Lastname Not true at all. They were all top drivers. Herbert was a huge talent in his early career. Didn't you follow F3000 at the time? He had his huge accident from which he never really recovered, unfortunately. Perhaps he was never quite the driver he could have been, but on occasion he was seriously quick. He never had the full backing of a team though and things never quite worked out.
@Firstname Lastname Mansell overrated? Hmmm... not sure about that. A guy from a Birmingham housing estate who had to re-mortgage his home to get, somehow, to F1, then is able to race on equal terms with Senna, Prost and co, and becomes world champion, then does the same in Indy cars. Overrated. Right... Run that one by me again. And you clearly don't seem to understand that some drivers just don't get the chances in F1. For example, do you really think that Brundle had a chance of getting the full support of the team, the upgrades and the best of everything, running alongside Schumacher? Of course not. Schumacher was a career destroyer. And Herbert was looked upon absolutely as a future world champion before his unfortunate accident. F1 is full of superb drivers who never quite got the chances - too many to mention but that's life
The back end of the Williams was twitchy look at the video here he has problems with the back end when they took away the driver aids everything got really scary Senna predicted there would be accidents unfortunately he died but I believe the steering column was the big culprit and it broke
Mansell´s skill was better than Damon Hill. He has more than half a second on his foot against hill. This is really amazing at his debue in the Formula. Hill has no chance against Mansell never. Mansell against schumacher from the beginning in 1994 then it went around. Hill is nothing against Schumacher, the fantastic Senna, the legend Mansell, the profesor Prost and the others.
+F1-Fan- 82 Well in 1994 Hill out qualified Mansell 3-1, beat him races 2-1 in races and outscored him 22-13. Mansell has no right being mentioned with the likes of Prost, Senna or Schumacher. Prost outscored Mansell 73-37 when they were team mates in 1990, meaning Mansell only scored 51% of Prost's points. In 1993 Damon Hill scored 70% of Prost's points (99-69) despite it being his first full season in the sport (after a half season in the dreadful 1992 Brabham). Another point of comparison is Elio de Angelis, who was team mates with both Mansell and Senna. de Angelis outscored Mansell 76-38, whilst de Angelis actually got very close to Senna, with Senna only outscoring him 38-33. Prost/Senna > de Angelis > Rosberg/Piquet/Mansell
Yeah, but I think Mansell would have demanded a lot more than Hill and Coulthard would.. and also Mansell would have been a very expensive driver to keep. Therefore, I think Williams decided to keep Hill and Coulthard..
So a guy who did the whole season on a car out qualifies a 41yo Former Champion that just comes to race 3 times. Yeah, well done mate. Prost the french politics bastard you mean? Yeah well, we all know how the story went at Ferrari when Prost arrived, don't we?
He proved he was better than Schumacher, Schumacher had to push his car beyond it's limits and crashed. he also crashed in the race and then deliberately drove into Damon Hill, taking them both out and handing the win to Nigel.
Williams was already faster than Benetton at this point. Newey already sorted their problem in mid season. It just Damon Hill was not a world class driver like Mansell and Schumacher.
41 years old and beating the two world championship contenders to pole then winning the race after spending 2 years in heavier indycars (becoming champion). One of the all time great drivers.
Mansell should of won as many championships as Senna. He just had more bad luck. He was just as quick, if not, even quicker than Senna.
@@posniknelb6114 Ayrton had more than double the pole number than Mansell. No way was Mansell quicker than Senna (to be fair no one was). All other things considered one can´t really compare (to many variables at stake), but concerning speed it was not even close. NO driver back then was as quick as Senna - in pure speed and natural talent - when driving those cars. And by a margin. His pole percentage back then (on "modern era cars") does not lie.
The pole was impressive but to be fair his race pace was not. He won but not because of a strong performance.
A full season in that car and he would have won again. Senna couldn't get to grips with it
Senna and Mansell is a dream combo which would destroy any team including Bennetton
The reflexes of Nigel to avoid contact in the first clip were remarkable. To be on a 'quickie' and come upon this - wonderful driving.
Mansell: one of great talents of motorrracing. Incredible talent. Great personality.Determination and commitment. True Legend. Happy to see him in action. Long live Nigel!
Mansell is ridiculously talented
Brilliant lap from Nigel - such skill and commitment even at 41 years old!
Was always a top qualifier. Even managed 8-8 against Prost in 1990 with the team openly prioritising Alain.
Prost was notorious for setting up his car for race conditions rather than qualifying. So its pretty bad that Mansell only managed 8-8 against Prost. Thats why Prost is often outqualified by Senna but he would have much better race pace.
Phantom5611 Senna dominated prost in qualifying because Prost knew it was a waste of energy trying to beat him in qualifying, he employed Lauda’s tactics that were used against himself in 84
@Firstname Lastname Ha ha, you seem to have a problem there with Mansell I see! Let it go, he may have had a more successful life than you, but he is long retired now...
@Firstname Lastname Please read what I said... You said that Mansell was "overrated". I said, looking at his achievements, that he wasn't. I never said he was as good as Prost or Senna - though he certainly could be every bit as fast. Just not the complete package that they were
Mansell should have won his first title in 1986, when Williams were by a mile superior to McLaren's. Instead of what he battled with his teammate. As a result Prost won, while Mansell & Piquet lost. Same in 1987, he had the car to win, but Piquet was still there. Anyway like him or not he was a very good driver, but lacked the ability or will to set up properly a car, you can't just hop in and drive. This is the key difference between title count, at some point you have to make one with the car. Should have retired in style after this race won, but messed it up totally.
The emergency spin was some stunning car control!
+X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X Indeed, amazing reaction and intelligence to react and spin the car to avoid collision. His save at Imola 1990 is the best of all time imo
+X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X Was that Schumacher in the Benetton? Can't clearly see it^^
+dinterful
I belive it is, judging by the white helmet with a stripe of some sort (should be black-red-gold) on the side. Furthermore, Schumacher crashed at this corner in practice and in the race, if I remember Adelaide correctly ;)
+X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X Yes, wasn't his best weekend^^
also check spa 1993 with senna in eu rouge or how is spelt :)mansel and senna was the last great f1 champs and i feel lucky i was there to see them fight live many times !!!
1:30 we dont get nowadays that sensation of thrill, epic and emotion
41 years old and still challenging the youngest. Should have won more titles. (and I'm a Prost fan)
I'm a huge Prost fan as well but Mansell had a lot of bad luck. Amazing that he won in 94. He would have been world champion in 93 had Williams not been so stupid. The car was built for Mansell and he was racing better and better
41 isn't old 🤣
Just shows the talent of the man, didn't really go testing and wasn't interested in fine tuning the set-up. Here he was an old man and part-time racing driver besting one of the best of all time. If he was around in today's era he would have given them all nightmares!
Vettel is modern day Mansell
What???
@@TheKestevon why??
I reckon he would have won the Drivers WC if he had a Williams drive in 1995.
Yes.
It would've been a tough battle vs Schumacher.
Car no. 2 started that season on pole and finished it there as well.
41 years and still winning
So good Nigel, whom I was a big fan, came back at the end of that dreadful season to give us back the taste of F1
As an american,and road racer first and foremost,I was looking to F1 to for s racing career and still,I was Nigel fan from way back and loved his personality,one thing I didn't know about him till reasontly was he came to williams as an engineer,and wonder what exact kind and if there was more in depth interviews where he talks more about starting at Williams,I know that background really helped him,I don't possess the academic train but like most itailians I look at technology from the position of a constructed,it really more of genetic problem I can never look at anything superficially...thanks for posting video of one my all time favorite drivers,probably the one...
Nigel went to Lotus as a test driver in 1980. He was very much an established F1 driver by the time he went to Willaims to partner Nelson Piquet for 1985.
What a legend
mansell the king
Ai num pode desmerecer ele a qualidade dele né. Pena que não continuou na WIlliams em 95. Acho que teria sido bem melhor a temporada...
I would like to have seen Nigel in that car from the start of the season and Ayrton in the other Benneton partner to Shumacher, that would have been very interesting.
@@chriswebb1148 Schumacher always driven 'how he did'. Look at 1995, when the Williams was better in the first half of the season and Michael still blew them away.
Then Mansell would've died instead
@@chriswebb1148 they found traces of launch control software. Try to be correct in your info.
They didn’t call A SENNA THE BOSS for nothing 😂
He would of been a good choice for 95. Frank didnt want to pay him.
and lost the championship.
41 and still fastest :-)
Lol the car you mean.
He means the driver, easy to see.
42 years old Michael got pole position at Monaco in 2012 in a midfield car.
@@TheKestevon Monaco is a different kettle of fish
@@scottnorman4334 yup. Not many champions were good on that track
Too bad Senna couldn’t live to see the evolution of FW16 - a car that born full of balance and aerodynamic issues.
It wasnt that bad. The Williams had a massive power advantage over the Ford and was very quick but hard to drive. By Imola, the car was already much better and by mid season, the best overall package.
@@weallfollowmanutd Depending of what you call late season, Senna was dead before it anyway
@@afoxwithahat7846 well, you don't say!
@@weallfollowmanutd Still it was hard to drive in Imola and far awa from beeing good to handle.
Hill had less issues than Ayrton in that car. Seemed like a bad marriage from the start for Senna, he had problems with it, especially with the cockpit, size and position of the steering wheel.
In one of his earlier tests during pre-season he told reporters that the car was "undrivable". But the FW16 was quick and had lots of potential, it wasn't bad, just had to be fine tuned.
Awesome Driver
Ah ces moteurs renault 👍 🇫🇷
1994.the last race of that year
Good video but it must be stressed that this was only Friday's first qualifying session. The next day, Mansell recorded a pole lap which was almost a full second faster than Messieurs Hill & Schumacher, and that was the one that truly counted!
This was the pole lap. On the Saturday it rained.
th-cam.com/video/u4cIfybRfQA/w-d-xo.html
la Pole Position che conferma, senza ogni dubbio, il gran Pilota che è stato Nigel Mansell!! ... questa monoposto non era assolutamente la migliore del lotto e lui la portò in cima alla griglia lo stesso!!
Hill si è giocato il titolo con la Williams. Forse non era il pacchetto completo che fù la Benetton di quel periodo, ma la FW16 era comunque un'ottima vettura e minimo la seconda miglior auto in pista.
@@livingbeing1113 concordo perfettamente con te. Hill è stato irruento, la miglior vettura quell'anno era la Benetton, ma per come si era messa quella gara, se avesse atteso un istante, avrebbe avuto il mondiale in tasca. Schumacher, viceversa è stato di una scorrettezza assoluta e la Fia ha dormito.-
Mansell was ridiculously fast and would have probably won 93,94,95 and maybe more years title behind the williams steering wheel
Yes he was fast but old :) And not as talented as Senna or new generation Schumacher. Besides if Senna couldn't work out in first races how to make the FW16 set ups better, and we was a master at that, i can hardly see Mansell doing better. Just see what happened in 95, off to Hakkinen by 3sec in McLaren. When he managed to get in ;)
@@heexxi i am sorry heexxi but you can’t argue the 95 season for Mansell. It’s just nonsense
And he was in my opinion better than Senna and indisputably more fair-play in head to head battle ( not difficult with Senna)
@@TheUlysse2000 How can he could be better that Senna, just see title and win count :) . In 5 years of F1 Mansell scored 1 pole no win. Senna scored 29 poles, 14 wins and one title. You can't seriously say he was better. I agree he was a spectacular driver, no doubt. In 94 he done 4 races as a reminder, 2 DNF, France and Europe, 4th in Japan Therefore certainly not a good choice for 95, or championship contender. He should have won 86/87 titles hands down, Williams-Honda were unbeatable at times. And with a more reliable car 91 because the Williams were on top again.
@@heexxi so you choose the period of time you want right? Ok in 1992 Mansell had 9 victories and one title. What about Senna? In 86 Senna ruined 2 races for Mansell, Brazil and Belgium.
You know Mansell was really the man to beat between 86 and 92 and he was very very unlucky. Others often won because of Mansell retirements
@@TheUlysse2000 Mansell ruined many races too, and his 1987 title on his own by wanting pole in Japan and crashed, had to withdraw the two races left handing the title to Piquet. I agree he won in 1992, but that's his 1st and only title. As i said and i recon he was talented, he should have won 86/87/91. 88 Williams lost Honda engine to McLaren ( 15 wins/16 races ) the car was no match to others. 89/90 at Ferrari ? 89 soso, 90 well Prost simply walked over him, and was nearly titled in 90 ( Mansell did not help much as a teammate either watch Portugal ). Unlucky is and excuse for losers. He was certainly not the man to beat , these were McLarens Prost and Senna. I'm watching F1 since 1984, and if you ask any driver / commentator of these years, if Mansell was superior in any ways to any otherr, well they will just say NO. As a finish i had to quote Mr Mc Enroe : YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS ;)
Taking it over from Senna and what a incredible pole from Mansell. He was the indy world champion and f1 champion at the same time! What a incredible racing driver! Frank Williams why didn't you let Senna and Mansell fight it out in 1992! Lastly launch control and the ban and that dirty take out at the end... Bennetton and those Cheat..ers get what they deserve..both of them! Karma comes back.. Literally. Miss you Ayrton
Nesse tempo o esporte era paixão e emoção, ex: Mansel, Jordan, Pelé, Maradona, Hortência, etc.
De 1s anos pra cá só interessa o
R€$ULTADO, ex: Schumi, Messi, Neymar, Lebron, Bolt...
0:19 is that David Coulthard?
Sure is. 1994 Williams test driver. Got the full time gig once nigel left.
Where is the steering column movement? I can´t see it...
the steering column movement happened only in Imola and especially in Senna's car
That happened after crash at Imola.
I miss John Watson's commentary so much
I found footage of him as a lead commentator on ESPN/Fox, he's simply brilliant
I can hear Alain Prost speaking, is it him?
2:43 angry v10 3.5
Mansells car control was reallyput to the test the williams looked like it wanted to throw you off the road at any second
Could have won the championship that year if he had had a fulltime seat?
How much better was adelaide track!
THANKS GUYS ❤ TODAY JUNE 2024❤
I was there!
With an difficult williams.
Schumacher what a legend!
assurdo che in williams abbiano aperto il cockpit per permettere alle mani di girare solo dopo la morte di senna. era una modifica che si poteva fare già dopo i test invernali
Why did Nigel Mansell come back exactly?
Because Bernie wanted a world champion on the grid because Senna was dead
When Coulthard mentioned that it's normal for a steering wheel to move 4 inches side to side I totally lost respect.
Coulthard was and is an annoying commentator. Never gets anything right and sounds righteous while doing it . A windbag.
Schumacher - Herbert ~1.5sec ...
Was only the second time Herbert have driven the B194...
pulse 'n' think to be fair, the car was setup to Schumacher’s liking, which is very pointy. Herbert didn’t necessarily like that setup, probably none of Schumi’s other Benetton teammates liked it either considering their relative lack of speed.
Firstname Lastname that’s rather harsh. None of them are all time greats, but not slouches either. Herbert and Brundle are Le Mans winners, and Hill is a World Champion, so none of them are complete hacks like a DeCesaris.
@Firstname Lastname Not true at all. They were all top drivers. Herbert was a huge talent in his early career. Didn't you follow F3000 at the time? He had his huge accident from which he never really recovered, unfortunately. Perhaps he was never quite the driver he could have been, but on occasion he was seriously quick. He never had the full backing of a team though and things never quite worked out.
@Firstname Lastname Mansell overrated? Hmmm... not sure about that. A guy from a Birmingham housing estate who had to re-mortgage his home to get, somehow, to F1, then is able to race on equal terms with Senna, Prost and co, and becomes world champion, then does the same in Indy cars. Overrated. Right... Run that one by me again. And you clearly don't seem to understand that some drivers just don't get the chances in F1. For example, do you really think that Brundle had a chance of getting the full support of the team, the upgrades and the best of everything, running alongside Schumacher? Of course not. Schumacher was a career destroyer. And Herbert was looked upon absolutely as a future world champion before his unfortunate accident. F1 is full of superb drivers who never quite got the chances - too many to mention but that's life
How well did he perform the following year at McLaren ??
Who cares? You, bitch?
Terrible, unfortunately. He was too big for the car, and honestly getting too old for F1. Australia 1994 was his last hurrah.
The car was a pile of crap to be fair. Once he realised how bad it was he lost motivation. No point making the numbers up after his career.
@Firstname Lastname In your opinion.
I don't see the steering column Shake on nigel car like it did on Senna
Cuz it was already fixed perhaps?
The back end of the Williams was twitchy look at the video here he has problems with the back end when they took away the driver aids everything got really scary Senna predicted there would be accidents unfortunately he died but I believe the steering column was the big culprit and it broke
Oldest pole better?
@@GuTOHGT Farina, you mean...
Mansell´s skill was better than Damon Hill. He has more than half a second on his foot against hill.
This is really amazing at his debue in the Formula. Hill has no chance against Mansell never.
Mansell against schumacher from the beginning in 1994 then it went around.
Hill is nothing against Schumacher, the fantastic Senna, the legend Mansell, the profesor Prost and the others.
F1-Fan- 82 Senna was 1 second faster than Hill in qualifying laps lol but yeah, Damon HIll cannot compare with these drivers...
+F1-Fan- 82
Well in 1994 Hill out qualified Mansell 3-1, beat him races 2-1 in races and outscored him 22-13.
Mansell has no right being mentioned with the likes of Prost, Senna or Schumacher. Prost outscored Mansell 73-37 when they were team mates in 1990, meaning Mansell only scored 51% of Prost's points. In 1993 Damon Hill scored 70% of Prost's points (99-69) despite it being his first full season in the sport (after a half season in the dreadful 1992 Brabham).
Another point of comparison is Elio de Angelis, who was team mates with both Mansell and Senna. de Angelis outscored Mansell 76-38, whilst de Angelis actually got very close to Senna, with Senna only outscoring him 38-33.
Prost/Senna > de Angelis > Rosberg/Piquet/Mansell
Yeah, but I think Mansell would have demanded a lot more than Hill and Coulthard would.. and also Mansell would have been a very expensive driver to keep. Therefore, I think Williams decided to keep Hill and Coulthard..
+Spinodontosaurus you know of f1metrics right?
So a guy who did the whole season on a car out qualifies a 41yo Former Champion that just comes to race 3 times. Yeah, well done mate.
Prost the french politics bastard you mean? Yeah well, we all know how the story went at Ferrari when Prost arrived, don't we?
Michael Schumakorrr
Dear francois gachot, you greedy too much. Because i'm not just only your old friend, i'm from alien world. From: eddie the 1st.
1:01 great.
He proved he was better than Schumacher, Schumacher had to push his car beyond it's limits and crashed. he also crashed in the race and then deliberately drove into Damon Hill, taking them both out and handing the win to Nigel.
Williams was already faster than Benetton at this point. Newey already sorted their problem in mid season. It just Damon Hill was not a world class driver like Mansell and Schumacher.
You just do not know what you say...you are so ignorant
Sweet beans.
Shake shake car , Fw16
what a year,,, even for Bezos ..... maybe he would safe F1 one day ... we can only wish..... haha hahah hahaha hahah ...
The arrogant risk ultrasonically punch because thunderstorm pathohistologically describe opposite a obsequious lyric. sad, noxious tenor
Yeah but he had all the charisma of a potato chip. Still a top man though but the interviews were a bit dull lol.
Not really
Fraps, those were the days!