It's clear out dude. Don't create excuses. If India need to be great again, they need to find their faults. No all the time Bumrah and Jaishwal will be present out there while all ther players are collapsing. . Respect the decision and move on
Clear not out thaa. Technology ko ek dum Bharosa nehi toh use kyon karte hoo? Umpire starting se Naked eye se dekh ke bol raha hai clear deflection. My point is naked eye ka decision on field umpire ka hai 3rd umpire ko technology use karna hoota hai
We all are far away from Australia 's MCG . Field umpires and third umpires are there to review the DRS taken by Australian players. We have to accept the umpire's descision. Indian players did not play up to their calibre.
Have you heard of optical illusions, if the Snicko shows no sound but still gave out, what is the point of Technology use in Cricket, then don't use Technology Sunil Gavaskar Said
Don't create confusions and raise questions against umpires for your own faults. It's only shameful batting display which caused the imminent downfall. No, excuses, please.
Have you heard of optical illusions, if the Snicko shows no sound but still gave out, what is the point of Technology use in Cricket, then don't use Technology Sunil Gavaskar Said
Have you heard of optical illusions, if the Snicko shows no sound but still gave out, what is the point of Technology use in Cricket, then don't use Technology Sunil Gavaskar Said
Bhad me jaye controversy.. the truth is that this is the most heartbreaking defeat in history for me . 😢 . I am watching cricket since Rahul dravid era .
Deflection was clear. Ball changed the direction. The reason there was no snicko was because it was far from stumps. The mic is not powerful to catch shortball clearly
Answer from Chat GPT and what’s the rules say about this controversy Yes, the third umpire can give it out even if Snicko doesn’t show a spike, provided there is clear and conclusive evidence from the visual replays to overturn the on-field decision. In the scenario you described, where there is a clear deflection of the ball near the bat or glove, the third umpire can use that visual evidence, along with any other supporting angles, to determine that the ball made contact with the bat or glove. According to the Decision Review System (DRS) protocols: • The third umpire must have conclusive evidence to overturn the on-field decision. • Tools like Snicko (UltraEdge) and ball-tracking are aids, but the final decision depends on the combination of all available evidence, including video replays. If the visual evidence clearly shows a deflection that indicates contact with the bat or glove, the third umpire is within their rights to overturn the “not out” decision and give the batter out.
stop your backwas even harsha said it was good decision by umpire ..he also said technology isn't 100 percent accurate and you can clearly see the deflection
the microphones are at the stumps and the contact point of the ball was really high from the microphones. thats why there was no sound picked up. but the deflection was clearly visible, hence there shouldn't be any controversies.
@rahulbist8647 ha aapki bat bhi sahi hai technology per question zaroor hai ki agar itna issue hai to hotspot use Krna chahiye, atleast Australia BCCI use kr skte hai wo technology kyuki wo bht mahngi hoti hai.... Magar out to tha ye clear hai
Yeh cricket ki analysts hain.. ICC rules mein kya likha huya hain ki snicko mein spike nahi hoga toh out nahi hain... umpires ke pas dimagh naam ki bhi cheez hote hain..
Umpires can decide after judging the scenario if they want to take the help of technology. it's good but technology cannot make decisions over people. After judging the scenario, technology may give you false results due to errors or malfunctions but human eye does't. since, there are chances of errors in the technology. That's why the control of using technology has been given to people. and despite having lots of technology, you also see two umpires on the peach for observation and for judging everything. there’s no decision making process here, this is a clear out.
It was clear out You don't need to hide behind these decision First of all no need to play this ball you are playing loose ball and then blaming umpires
Aussie media said it right. You guys are cry babies. You guys are crying because the decision hasn't been made in your favour. Jaiswal played well and deserved the century. I felt bad for him. But that was clear out. If it didn’t edge then why the ball deflected so much? It's simple case of technological error and third-umpire made the right call by giving Jaiswal out
Dude the ball doesn't change direction and slow down if it doesn't have deflection. The keeper had to dive forward to catch it. Even the batsman was walking initially. Make a fuss out of something that is pointless or look at the other main issues in Indian batting.
If It was an optical illusion of deflection then,, why Australian thought it was clearly out and take instantly review? Why Pat Cummins was so confident? I think there was minimal touch on globe which could not captured by Mic... ICC should instantly think about such extreme conditions.
I don't know if this is out or not out, but according to the law, even if you look almost identical to your father, if a DNA test fails, then you are not legally considered his son. I hope this rule is consistent worldwide. However, this umpire might issue a certificate solely based on facial similarity, and some people might also agree with him. But as per the law and technological evidence, a father's and son's DNA results are definitive and do not fail.
Given out, despite a spike on Snickometer. Upon review, there was a clear gap between the bat and ball. decesion turned down. You need to understand the basics of cricket, please. it was clear drflection
Ohh Bhai Its was clear out 😂 meter can be wrong coz sometimes but the large Deflection can't be wrong everyone can see it with naked eye,, and still if jaiswal has been given notout india still haven't won this game
😡Poor Test Team selection😡 😡ROHIT, Kohli or Siraj ne es series me sirf nautanki ki he..... Performance to dur dur tak nahi hai👎🏻😡😡.. Siraj or Pant kis basis par indian test team me he😡..Rohit, Virat, Jadeja please retirement declare kar do es match ke baad🙏🏻.........5 days domestic test match khelne wale inform young players ko Indian Test team me chance do... 🙏🏻
The only one who should be criticized here on this dismissal is jaiswal..it was clearly out ..a huge deflection and he knew it...but even after given out ..he was shamelessly standing there acting like he had been given out wrongly...and 2ndly about snicko..technology has its glitches..sometimes the snicko wont be able to pick the sound...that doesn't mean that a huge deflection of the bat should be ignored by the umpire and should be given not out just because Snickometer didn't pick the sound
It was out...rohit Sharma also confirmed it. Raising question on umpire is wrong... Question should be raised on snico technology and it's accuracy...It was clear out but snico didn't detect it.
In the last month Technology said Mohammad Siraj bowled at 181 kph , do you believe that? There are some errors in the technology and you can not avoid it. Ricky ponting, Ex number one umpire Simon Tuffel even Rohit Sharma, Harsha Bhogle, Ravi Satstri said it was out so there are no debate and controversy about this decision. Just try to find out the root cause regarding your poor performance that will be helpful for you.
Clear evidence of deflection. out clear. World famous cricketers and sports analyst are appreciating this decision and you are saying controversial decision! How funny😆😆😆😆😆
OUT THA ! Korean ho yaa Japani Umpire. Mast hain abhi sab selection commitee senior players or baki sab jo is halat k liye responsible hain . Woh sab BANGLADESH K PICHE CHUP JAO ! AUR KYA AUSTRALIA OR HUM ME TOH YEHI FAARK REH GIYE HAI.
Snicko or any other technology is to support your visual decision. It is not always 100% accurate. It can never be used to overrule visual indication when it is clear that there was a nick resulting in deflection for jaiswal. Sometimes when bowl is very close to bat and you cant be sure if there was a nick, then snicko can help to augment your decision whether it is out or not. In Bumrah case as well, it was clear both with naked eye and snicko that there was a nick. Umpires got it wrong both time but i dont blame them when it was very difficult decision to make in real time. Moreover, jaiswal survived lbw from starc early on which could have gone Aus ways, then ind would lose match quickly. So umpires got 3 decision in india's favor and you are blaming them. Seriously? Stop creating unnecessary conflicts for views and focus on upcoming matches
The ball was not close to the wicket. It was almost 2 meters above the ground. the snicko wouldn’t work there. So based on noise only wouldn’t make sense. They used another technology where you can clearly see that the ball was changing trajectory. Even with the blind on slow motion you can see the ball was changing trajectory. The only thing you can debate about is…Why isn’t there a hot spot system? Never the less it was a poor shot by jaiswal at that moment. He shouldn’t have played it. And all the biased Indian fans out there. Y’all didn’t deserve to win that game. It’s a ten man game and only 2 of them played decent in two innings. Just move on people hope for the best on the next game. 👍🏼
Abey kon si controversy? Clear deviation IS conclusive evidence. It doesn’t matter if snicko picks it up or not. Visual evidence is sufficient evidence
Well sadly there was no Imran khan moment when he called the Indian player back to bat when he was given out and on the next ball he gets him out. Just see the level of his confidence.
So, clear deflection is not conclusive? How did the ball changed It's line so much. That much deflection is conclusive. Technology is not alway 100% right.
Kiitttnnnaaa sakooonnn arha hy na inko cheekhhta dekh k😂😂😂😂😂😂 ab pata lga kesa hta hy cheating se jeetna😂😂😂😂😂 hogya badla pura😂😂😂😂 sakooonnnnnnnnnnnn😂😂😂😂
The technology behind Snickometer is not 100 percent accurate you know... mistakes can happen. And that was clear as day that desicion, I mean it wasn't difficult at all.
It's clear out dude. Don't create excuses. If India need to be great again, they need to find their faults. No all the time Bumrah and Jaishwal will be present out there while all ther players are collapsing. . Respect the decision and move on
Yes 101% but technology hai toh use krke dikha dena tha ..jab pta hai controversy hogi😂😂
@@AS_17007 Bhai Technology hi use karke Visual Evidence dikhaya hai ... Bowl ki tracking tk dikhai hai jismein 100% deflection tha mere bhai
@@AtifAliKhan-ys4ee Hotspot kiuki yeh bol rhe hain.Air flow se deflection hua hai
It was not out
@@sid156 then siraj 181 kmh bowl🤣 woh celebrate kiu nahi kar rahi ho
It was a clear out, don’t make excuses team Sports Yaari
Sniko में तो डिफ्लेक्शन था ही नहीं मेरे भाई..phir out ksay day diya
Clear not out thaa.
Technology ko ek dum Bharosa nehi toh use kyon karte hoo?
Umpire starting se Naked eye se dekh ke bol raha hai clear deflection.
My point is naked eye ka decision on field umpire ka hai
3rd umpire ko technology use karna hoota hai
@@risingrathoresmusic9940 sniko is just a technique, it can have limitations, but deviation was quite visual
@ camera is also technology, cameras showing that there is deviation and bowl touch the gloves
We all are far away from Australia 's MCG . Field umpires and third umpires are there to review the DRS taken by Australian players. We have to accept the umpire's descision. Indian players did not play up to their calibre.
It was a clear out so don't overreact on third umpire decision and accept humiliate decision 😂
Woh log aisa bol Rahe kyuki in logoko excuses chaiye ki qussies india se better nahi hain that's it😂
Liberals have arrived.... Indias problem characters
Have you heard of optical illusions, if the Snicko shows no sound but still gave out, what is the point of Technology use in Cricket, then don't use Technology Sunil Gavaskar Said
@VedantTech7it was a deflection not an optical illusion, the ball slowed and carey had to dive down for a 135 km/ph bouncer, does it sound logical???
No boss.
Ball trajectory changed clearly.
There was a clear deflection
😊
Good point 🎉
It was not out
@@sid156if this is not out Then Newton's first law is wrong.
Jaiswal should of been out earlier , the ball was clearly hitting the stumps , but some what it was umpire decision …
😂
Ha , hamare paksh main Na tha.😂😂
Yes bro but for sports yaari it doesn't matter 🤣
Don't create confusions and raise questions against umpires for your own faults. It's only shameful batting display which caused the imminent downfall. No, excuses, please.
it Was Clear out ...Can siraj bowl more than 160km ???? but your speedo meter showed 182km ,,,, be realistic ACCEPT YOUR DEFEAT
Very good poin
😂😂😂😂😂😂 true
Have you heard of optical illusions, if the Snicko shows no sound but still gave out, what is the point of Technology use in Cricket, then don't use Technology Sunil Gavaskar Said
Even these guys know its clear out. So let them run their Drama, create controversies and teach umpires on how to make decisions 😆
Dont teach umpire so shut your mouth you cant change reality now
Out or not out matter nahi hai ji
Jab aap technology use krty ho to rule ke hisab se out nahi tha bss itni si baat hai .
@@rahulbist8647technology > human?
Have you heard of optical illusions, if the Snicko shows no sound but still gave out, what is the point of Technology use in Cricket, then don't use Technology Sunil Gavaskar Said
@@rahulbist8647 Agreed
You know umpires don't know everything
Travis Head be like -Batting nhi kya to khush ho gaye lo bowling kar li or hra bhi diya.pant ka wicket turning point
It's clear out.. Vese b india ko harna hi tha itna ghatiya perfomance Rohit, virat, rahul ky bole
Clearly out no doubt
Bhad me jaye controversy.. the truth is that this is the most heartbreaking defeat in history for me . 😢 . I am watching cricket since Rahul dravid era .
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Where Siraj can bowl at 180 kilometers per hour, there is no guarantee that the snicko will not be damaged.!! 😂
Deflection was clear. Ball changed the direction. The reason there was no snicko was because it was far from stumps. The mic is not powerful to catch shortball clearly
Clear out tha.koi controversial decision nahi tha
Answer from Chat GPT and what’s the rules say about this controversy
Yes, the third umpire can give it out even if Snicko doesn’t show a spike, provided there is clear and conclusive evidence from the visual replays to overturn the on-field decision.
In the scenario you described, where there is a clear deflection of the ball near the bat or glove, the third umpire can use that visual evidence, along with any other supporting angles, to determine that the ball made contact with the bat or glove.
According to the Decision Review System (DRS) protocols:
• The third umpire must have conclusive evidence to overturn the on-field decision.
• Tools like Snicko (UltraEdge) and ball-tracking are aids, but the final decision depends on the combination of all available evidence, including video replays.
If the visual evidence clearly shows a deflection that indicates contact with the bat or glove, the third umpire is within their rights to overturn the “not out” decision and give the batter out.
When you cheat, it's right.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
When the right decision is made, it is called cheating.
The ball touched gloves clearly, it was a soft touch and maybe because of the distance snico meter didn't register the spike
stop your backwas even harsha said it was good decision by umpire ..he also said technology isn't 100 percent accurate and you can clearly see the deflection
the microphones are at the stumps and the contact point of the ball was really high from the microphones. thats why there was no sound picked up. but the deflection was clearly visible, hence there shouldn't be any controversies.
Saaf saaf deflection hai. Hum log jab harte hai to bs yahi rona shuru kr dete hai
Bhai ye baat nahi hai
Aus ne bahut acha khela but jab sniko me koi sound hi nahi hai or technology jab use krty hai uss hisab se out nahi tha
@rahulbist8647 ha aapki bat bhi sahi hai technology per question zaroor hai ki agar itna issue hai to hotspot use Krna chahiye, atleast Australia BCCI use kr skte hai wo technology kyuki wo bht mahngi hoti hai.... Magar out to tha ye clear hai
Yeh cricket ki analysts hain.. ICC rules mein kya likha huya hain ki snicko mein spike nahi hoga toh out nahi hain... umpires ke pas dimagh naam ki bhi cheez hote hain..
No controversy, no cheating, when you loose just suckup & move on .
Bangladeshi tha third empire to usne apni akuat dikha di
😂
You Indians are super racist.
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🎉🥳
Abe clear out tha wo
Rona shuru kar diya😂😂😂
Now satisfy your bruised egos with cheating charge
abe out tha red mark bhi bana tha bat pr
Brave & right decision by third umpire
Kya bola tha india tou 3rd session mein gayo 😂
Umpires can decide after judging the scenario if they want to take the help of technology. it's good
but technology cannot make decisions over people.
After judging the scenario, technology may give you false results due to errors or malfunctions but human eye does't.
since, there are chances of errors in the technology. That's why the control of using technology has been given to people.
and despite having lots of technology, you also see two umpires on the peach for observation and for judging everything.
there’s no decision making process here, this is a clear out.
Now we understand How big Dhoni's decision was for team to move on without him - Hats off Dhoni - legendary retirement.
If umpire is convinced than he has the right to give the desicion
Is out ko dikha ke pura team ke batting me jo Kami ho usko nhi chupana chahiye 😢😢😢😢
India crying 😂😂😂😊
Does India have shops which sell glasses?
fhir to siraj ka 181km wala ball bhi sahi tha?
You know World Class Batting .. aisy Decisions py Dhyaaan na Dia kro
Rohit out is cheating
Virat out is cheating
Kl out is cheating
Jaiswal out is cheating
India lose is cheating 🤡
Only win is right
Simply you can see the change rotation of the ball after passing the player
Bangladeshi umpire ne aukat dikha di
cry baby😂😂😂 kesa laga ab
@HasanA9876 Bangladeshi can just cheat but never win a icc trophy india will destroy ban in champions trophy 😆
haha Maza agya...ab jhota rona Shuru krdo
Commonsense - Why Deflection happened? Or this is Cry Baby
Why Deflection happened?
All Pakistanis are giving their attendance in the comment section 😂😂 .
They are actually here to give an attendance to your mother, so don't intervene
Commonsense
That deviation was just bcz of bat flow..the pressure that bat created changed the flow of ball and thus it deviated
Out hai paiijaan😂😂. Aaj koi bachne ke koshish nhi kare ga
From winning to see win in resisting follow on and draw ..we came a long way
It was clear out
You don't need to hide behind these decision
First of all no need to play this ball you are playing loose ball and then blaming umpires
Ap roo mat har taslim kro yhii brabr hy
Right decision... Don't cry.....
Aussie media said it right. You guys are cry babies. You guys are crying because the decision hasn't been made in your favour.
Jaiswal played well and deserved the century. I felt bad for him. But that was clear out. If it didn’t edge then why the ball deflected so much? It's simple case of technological error and third-umpire made the right call by giving Jaiswal out
Dude the ball doesn't change direction and slow down if it doesn't have deflection. The keeper had to dive forward to catch it. Even the batsman was walking initially. Make a fuss out of something that is pointless or look at the other main issues in Indian batting.
Clear deflection. There was no spike because spike is based on noise bro. Gloves do not make noise. So no spike!!!! Use hotspot😊
On this ground of MCG that no ball of nawaz happened , now wakt aik sa nai rehta aaj india ka rona he , or ground b same he
If It was an optical illusion of deflection then,,
why Australian thought it was clearly out and take instantly review?
Why Pat Cummins was so confident?
I think there was minimal touch on globe which could not captured by Mic...
ICC should instantly think about such extreme conditions.
No big controversy, no cheating here.. I think the Indian captain made it clear during the press conference..
I don't know if this is out or not out, but according to the law, even if you look almost identical to your father, if a DNA test fails, then you are not legally considered his son. I hope this rule is consistent worldwide. However, this umpire might issue a certificate solely based on facial similarity, and some people might also agree with him. But as per the law and technological evidence, a father's and son's DNA results are definitive and do not fail.
Given out, despite a spike on Snickometer. Upon review, there was a clear gap between the bat and ball. decesion turned down. You need to understand the basics of cricket, please. it was clear drflection
Aik baar lbw bhe tha woh not out dyaa !!!
If u see side view than It was clearly out. Bowl touched the upper portion of the bat that's why there was a big deflection
Why controversy 😂😂 It’s clear out.
Clear glove
Look who is talking aboout cheating 🤣🤣🤣🤣
If it is not conclusive Benefit of doubt must go to batsmen.
Bhaiya Dil ko tassali dene k lye acha hai mgr fact yeh hai k vo ball uske gluff pr lag kr itni swing hoyi hai k empire out dene pr majboor hogaya
Ohh Bhai Its was clear out 😂 meter can be wrong coz sometimes but the large Deflection can't be wrong everyone can see it with naked eye,, and still if jaiswal has been given notout india still haven't won this game
We watch your comments, because u r honest, I expect you to accept that he was clearly OUT! do not confuse it.
Onfeild empire ko awaz NH ayi spikes NH aye mgr ball to lag kr swing hoyi naa Meri ulado
Wase Hotspot aur sinoco dono ko use karo agar ek se clear nhi ho to 2nd option se check dono hone chaiye taki bastmen ke saat galat na ho
😡Poor Test Team selection😡
😡ROHIT, Kohli or Siraj ne es series me sirf nautanki ki he..... Performance to dur dur tak nahi hai👎🏻😡😡.. Siraj or Pant kis basis par indian test team me he😡..Rohit, Virat, Jadeja please retirement declare kar do es match ke baad🙏🏻.........5 days domestic test match khelne wale inform young players ko Indian Test team me chance do... 🙏🏻
This is 200% right decision
The only one who should be criticized here on this dismissal is jaiswal..it was clearly out ..a huge deflection and he knew it...but even after given out ..he was shamelessly standing there acting like he had been given out wrongly...and 2ndly about snicko..technology has its glitches..sometimes the snicko wont be able to pick the sound...that doesn't mean that a huge deflection of the bat should be ignored by the umpire and should be given not out just because Snickometer didn't pick the sound
Due process has not been followed by umpire
It was stonewall Out mate. Come on you Aussies.
Ab Rona shroo kar dia hahahahhaha
It was out...rohit Sharma also confirmed it. Raising question on umpire is wrong... Question should be raised on snico technology and it's accuracy...It was clear out but snico didn't detect it.
That was out😂
ye wesy hi out de diya hai jesy india v Bangladesh match mn kohli ki century ki wjhse wide ball ho wide hi ni tha diya gya 😂😂😂
In the last month Technology said Mohammad Siraj bowled at 181 kph , do you believe that? There are some errors in the technology and you can not avoid it. Ricky ponting, Ex number one umpire Simon Tuffel even Rohit Sharma, Harsha Bhogle, Ravi Satstri said it was out so there are no debate and controversy about this decision. Just try to find out the root cause regarding your poor performance that will be helpful for you.
Abay technology truth tak
Pohnchnay k Leye hai
Stupid deflection hi conclusive evidence hai
Clear evidence of deflection. out clear. World famous cricketers and sports analyst are appreciating this decision and you are saying controversial decision! How funny😆😆😆😆😆
OUT THA ! Korean ho yaa Japani Umpire. Mast hain abhi sab selection commitee senior players or baki sab jo is halat k liye responsible hain . Woh sab BANGLADESH K PICHE CHUP JAO ! AUR KYA AUSTRALIA OR HUM ME TOH YEHI FAARK REH GIYE HAI.
Snicko or any other technology is to support your visual decision. It is not always 100% accurate. It can never be used to overrule visual indication when it is clear that there was a nick resulting in deflection for jaiswal. Sometimes when bowl is very close to bat and you cant be sure if there was a nick, then snicko can help to augment your decision whether it is out or not. In Bumrah case as well, it was clear both with naked eye and snicko that there was a nick. Umpires got it wrong both time but i dont blame them when it was very difficult decision to make in real time. Moreover, jaiswal survived lbw from starc early on which could have gone Aus ways, then ind would lose match quickly. So umpires got 3 decision in india's favor and you are blaming them. Seriously? Stop creating unnecessary conflicts for views and focus on upcoming matches
Clearly out
See a eye doctor.
There was a huge deflection
It was snicko meters fault.
100 out he...
Poor Rendia 😂
Don't cry plz..this is real out decision..
Batsman nakaam ho gaye.sirf jaiswal kya kar sakta hai..kohli aur rohit kya kiya.paata wicket pe out ho gaye
The ball was not close to the wicket. It was almost 2 meters above the ground. the snicko wouldn’t work there. So based on noise only wouldn’t make sense.
They used another technology where you can clearly see that the ball was changing trajectory. Even with the blind on slow motion you can see the ball was changing trajectory. The only thing you can debate about is…Why isn’t there a hot spot system?
Never the less it was a poor shot by jaiswal at that moment. He shouldn’t have played it. And all the biased Indian fans out there. Y’all didn’t deserve to win that game. It’s a ten man game and only 2 of them played decent in two innings.
Just move on people hope for the best on the next game. 👍🏼
Clear Out brother 😂😂
Abey kon si controversy? Clear deviation IS conclusive evidence. It doesn’t matter if snicko picks it up or not. Visual evidence is sufficient evidence
Well sadly there was no Imran khan moment when he called the Indian player back to bat when he was given out and on the next ball he gets him out. Just see the level of his confidence.
بھائی اب رونا بند کریں ہار تو گئے ہیں اپ اب انڈیا رونے کے سوا اور کر بھی کیا سکتا ہے
Umpire ek insaan h...insaan ki aankhe dhokha nhi de skti...orr technology 100% thik nhi hoti
So, clear deflection is not conclusive? How did the ball changed It's line so much. That much deflection is conclusive. Technology is not alway 100% right.
Kiitttnnnaaa sakooonnn arha hy na inko cheekhhta dekh k😂😂😂😂😂😂 ab pata lga kesa hta hy cheating se jeetna😂😂😂😂😂 hogya badla pura😂😂😂😂 sakooonnnnnnnnnnnn😂😂😂😂
The way indian cricket team is playing I don't think so they deserve to win this series
Remember the Emerging asia cup India vs Afghanistan 1st wicket .what about that cartoon
😂😂 so, how did that deflection occur, u r telling there is clear deflection and u r also saying it is not out.....😅😅
The technology behind Snickometer is not 100 percent accurate you know... mistakes can happen. And that was clear as day that desicion, I mean it wasn't difficult at all.
Do you want to say technology is better than human come to reality man technology made human.