Let me know if you watched the video until the end if you would like to see more long videos like this! Soon im planning to expand on my content and I wanna do challenges but also longer detailed guides!
the T-14 doing less damage isn’t confusing, basically the T-14 has the 2A82 cannon, which is basically just a 2A46 gun, both fire shitty APFSDS being able to penetrate about 500 millimeters of armor, compared to the M829A2 APFSDS fired by the M1 Abrams’ 120mm M256 L/44 gun can penetrate around 660 millimeters of steel, so it is statistically correct for the AbramsX to dish out more damage. Edit: Also, the AbramsX is pay to win compared to the T-14 so the devs purposely make it better, also the T-14 is absolute garbage in reality.
Tbh as someone who is 70% p2w (ownership of abx, fal heavy, and ww2 pack) I personally think it’s stupid that paid options are dead best. I think the p2w options are so overpowered that they put the player using it up a whole level. For example. I think the average abx user (not considered to be badly skilled or highly skilled) is on the same level as a highly skilled or good player, who’s playing in the T-14 or any of the other MBTs. A bad player using the abx would be on the same level as an average player. Same thing goes for all the other p2w vehicles and gear. This is absolutely bonkers. I understand that the devs want to make money, so they make paid options the best so more people will buy them. But in a game like this where most of the missions to get different vehicles are long, tedious and difficult at times is more than enough reason to buy a paid vehicle. I think there should be a free to play vehicle in every category, that is on par with the paid option. Although it should be the most difficult to unlock. Another thing that would be fine is if paid options just had an extra unique abilities. For example: if the f35 was the same in terms of performance to the harrier but in addition it has the ability to drop bombs. That would still make the f35 better, since it is the only plane that can hover and drop bombs and honestly deal with ground targets the easiest. It would be plenty of reason to buy it. And since you don’t have to make the long grind of level 30 to unlock it, it’s still a good choice for those who don’t want to go through that grind. This way paid options are technically still the “best” but there is a free alternative options that free to play players can use with immense effort put into the game to grind for it. This way players aren’t discouraged to pvp. Because sometimes it really does feel hopeless when a decent p2w player enters the lobbby.
You know, the VCAC and BTR-80 are both just like the M3 Bradley, how?, Well, firstly, BTR-80 has a 30mm explosive cannon and a machine gun, just like the Bradley, and VCAC has wire guided missiles, just like the Bradley, so really, the Bradley is just VCAC and BTR-80 combined, really the only difference is that the BTR-80 is amphibious (at least it will be in the future) and VCAC has more wire guided missiles, so yeah.
Você usou que tipo de maconha? Não tem nada a ver, BTR E VCAC e M3 e uma coisa totalmente diferente é Outra inclusive aonde as rodas aparecem? Na lua? Sem conta oque o BTR será anfíbio eo VCAC eu carro anti tank leve Que é movido sobre rodas e apenas possuem as mesma arma do M3 Bradley eo Adtas a diferença é que a do VCAC é feita pra tanks
2:23 the shell size does not always matter, statistically tanks do not have health bars in the real world and other stuff affects damage such as the length of the barrel which can improve the velocity of the shell and the type of shell American shells being better than the Russian equivalent here
2:15 the cannons do have a difference in size but that doesnt necessarily mean that bigger = more damage, as irl most (if not all) modern tanks use APSD rounds which are basically smaller rods than the diameter of the barrel and use a sabot to keep the pressure behind the round, ps i dunno if 5mm gonna make that much off a difference (thats what she said 💀)
yeah I agree with that, heres the thing, I would have mentioned that in the video itself but it was already gonna be long and least according to how war tycoon does it they do more damage based on the size in most instances
While they both shoot apfsds shells 5mm means they can fit more powder behind The shell, they can also fire a bigger dart which should create more spall
Hi bro, excellent video, keep it up, but, in the last video I asked you if there was a new code, to which you replied yes, could you tell me what the code is? Thank you :)
little correction: explosive machine gun on the abramsX does NOT fire faster than the t-14. the abramsX has a slow explosive machine gun and also a normal machine gun. while the t-14 has a fast explosive machine but none with normal bullets
@MoazRBLX thanks for pointing that out but even the e turret on t14 is slower then normal bullets and the abrams x has medium e bullets and fast normal bullets so I think that's why I said that but I phrased it wrong and it's a very small speed difference(like 0.3 seconds) between the t14 and abrams x so I still think abrams x takes that point
T14 takes more damage to rpg etc on the sides its more durable at the front on the sides it takes 4 rpg shots on the side for abramsX it takes 5 rpg shots I think they might of slightly buffed the abramsX
Yeah But its important to test damage for the same place plus people mostly go for front hits. Either way I think abrams got slightly buffed, in fact all tanks did and ill make a video on that soon
2:10 the size of the gun has nothing to do with the damage it’s the velocity of the shell, 3:38 it does more damage shooting in the side, that’s why you t-14 was faster in that situation 5:30 the t-14 has explosive reactive armor which has no advantage over Normal shells, only high explosive shells, which is the kind of round the rpg uses 8:00 bro really hit the barrel💀💀💀 he’d have won by a lot if he were to hit a better spot
The T-14 Armata (At least irl, since ERA doesn't work in this game) uses Monolith ERA, which is highly effective against Kinetic Energy munitions (APFSDS, APDS, AP, APHE), not only Chemical Energy munitions (HE, HEATFS, ATGM, HESH) Russian ERA from Kontakt-5 and above have been known to be effective at significantly reducing the amount of penetrating power that KE rounds can have.
@@generalschmidt7429 it’s effective e against the ke which is true however it protects even better against HEAT, which is the round the rpg uses. I gotta admit it’s true most of you stuff you said
@@sebastianaxdalstergaard1959 Yes, despite its high effectiveness against Kinetic Energy munitions, it is still around 2 or 3 times more effective against Chemical Energy munitions!
By the way: th-cam.com/video/zK77-8kJ69c/w-d-xo.htmlfeature=shared A simulated example of an APFSDS round hitting a T-90M protected by Relikt ERA (Maybe, the creator didn't say what ERA it is, but it looks like Relikt because of the two plates flying inwards and outwards when the ERA exploded), which is less effective than T-14's Monolith ERA. (This is not 100% accurate to irl but it is accurate enough)
Would u rather have a tank with explosive guns (no addition other bullets) that have normal 125mm ammo OR a tank with a XM360 120m with a explosive gun that also fires additional other bullets and a javelin?
??, all you did here was some fancy wording, XM360 being the name of the 120mm gun of the abrams X, and you can make the T-14 also look as good as the abrams by saying or a tank that has a 2A82-1M smoothbore 125mm gun with an automatic remote controlled explosive machine gun. The difference in damage is simply because of the difference in the APFSDS shells that they have, they both use APFSDS, but unsurprisingly the one that costs 1500 robux deals more damage, now of course the Abrams X is better because of its higher DPS, more DPM when it comes to the explosive machine gun, and its inclusion of a javelin will of course make the abrams better.
@@Guygotphonecall I'd love to see a source saying that the XM360 is a shell, because all sources I've seen are saying that the XM360 is a light-weight 120mm gun, and yes the fancy wording does stand for something, the non-fancy wording of what you said. What you basically said was: Would you want to have a tank with a 30mm explosive autocannon with a 125mm smoothbore that fires APFSDS, OR a tank that has a 30mm explosive autocannon with generally better shells than the Armata's 30mm, with a 120mm cannon that also fires APFSDS, and a javelin equipped.
@@Guygotphonecall I am not denying the fact that the Abrams X is (blatantly) better than the Armata, because it is! But what I'm saying is that you used some fancy wording to make the other tank look better when they virtually have the same features but one with amplified performance (better performance) and the addition of a javelin and the other having the same thing except its lacking a bit of DPS, DPM and a javelin.
T-90A and the T-72A both use the 2A46M gun, albeit different versions (2A46M-1, 2A46M-4, 2A46, 2A46-2, blah blah) but the T-14 uses the 2A82 gun, and in-game the guns do different amounts of damage
I think the biggest advantage that the abx has over the armata is blowout panels, like 99% of time abx users are absolute dogshit but even if you destroy their tank they just jump out and finish you off with an rpg, it's super annoying.
abrams x deals more damage, has a better APFSDS shell than both of them, has an explosive machine gun with stupid DPM and includes a javelin, although the T-90A does have a great passive and good main gun DPM, it doesn't beat the abrams X besides it's reload, albeit the T-90A having I think the fastest reload in the game for a tank, although that needs confirmation, but other than that it has the same hp, worse DPS on both the machine guns and main gun, and lacks a javelin.
The weapon caliber is not the only factor, there’s speed of shell, density of shell, penetrating power, velocity, etc Am still confused why it has an explosive machine gun to this day ITS A MAGAZINE NOT A CLIP (technically it’s the barrel overheating cause no reload animation) T-14 def protected by Stalinium Yeah basically no tank is surviving a Javelin to the roof, the armour is to thin and the Javelin has to much penetrating power Ok bu bai am sticking with the Abrams X I still haven’t unlocked T-14 lmao
*Devs trying to be realistic so they decide to make T-14 more durable to be real life accurate* and then fucking up in numbers and making 120mm stronger than 125mm
well the abram x has more damage than the armata even tho the armata has a larger caliber due to the tank shell that was fired from the cannon, because lets be real t-14 irl is prob some propaganda that its stronger than even the abrams [like the shell could be KE, or something from the future since it isn´t developed yet] + yeah the fact that a tank from future can be beaten by a tank that can´t even compare to the leopard 2a7
yeah I agree it could be propaganda, at the end of the day reason why i was surprised with stronger abrams cannon was also because on average in this game they base damage on size
actual shell fired: shell velocity: a bunch of other statistics that go into how much damage a cannon should do: this guy: "125mm bigger than 120mm, more damage 🤓☝" like, no true offense meant but that's kind of dumb to think that's how it works
I dont think thats how it works, im basing what I say on past things developers do and they seem to on average follow the pattern on bigger the size the stronger the shot
@@LordBloxxxxxx im sure it's taken into account, it's just not something they display, why else would a T-72 (keep in mind that thing is from the early cold war), that has the same caliber as a T-90, do far less damage ? because the shell fired is a lot weaker, the gun and ammo are older, etc.
ngl they should buff the t14 or nerf the x with the javelin am playin both but only bcs of the javelin the abramsx has soooo many advantegets over every other tank like it makes more damage but the most annoying part is that the abramsx can locate u with that stupid thing and is instand battle ready while u just chill, and 2 secs later ur dead bcs you have not even seen him or for me the most annoying part in the game is that when western tanks blow up, they dot blow up. i know that the tanks burn out in real life and dont make boom but why the hell do u surive that hell inside an abramsx when ur tank died ?!?! while when ur in an russian tank u instandly die my oppinion is that u should die in both vehicles when ur tank dies
@@cherylmark7 so you mean the explosive autocannon on the top of the vehicle? if so the abrams x's autoloader is significantly faster than the armata's one
How is it realistic the t14 in the game don’t even have rocket that can disrupt javelin ,how ever IRL it has the system that can disrupt javelin or any anti-tank guided missiles🙄🙄🙄
I don’t think you know what you’re talking about. It’s called APS not “rocket” and it can’t shoot javelins down only deploy smoke grenades to hide it from the javelin.
Make maus realistic? Let it be it already balance to me, if it going to be realistic then its gonna be much slower also modern tank can penetrate it easily since you want it realistic
Let me know if you watched the video until the end if you would like to see more long videos like this!
Soon im planning to expand on my content and I wanna do challenges but also longer detailed guides!
The reason why it dose more damage is because American tanks are better then Russian ones
ok
the T-14 doing less damage isn’t confusing, basically the T-14 has the 2A82 cannon, which is basically just a 2A46 gun, both fire shitty APFSDS being able to penetrate about 500 millimeters of armor, compared to the M829A2 APFSDS fired by the M1 Abrams’ 120mm M256 L/44 gun can penetrate around 660 millimeters of steel, so it is statistically correct for the AbramsX to dish out more damage.
Edit: Also, the AbramsX is pay to win compared to the T-14 so the devs purposely make it better, also the T-14 is absolute garbage in reality.
This tank does not have a spray plate 💀💀💀
Hi
The Devs changed it so that p2ws could still have better stuff than the best non p2w stuff
Tbh as someone who is 70% p2w (ownership of abx, fal heavy, and ww2 pack) I personally think it’s stupid that paid options are dead best. I think the p2w options are so overpowered that they put the player using it up a whole level. For example. I think the average abx user (not considered to be badly skilled or highly skilled) is on the same level as a highly skilled or good player, who’s playing in the T-14 or any of the other MBTs. A bad player using the abx would be on the same level as an average player. Same thing goes for all the other p2w vehicles and gear. This is absolutely bonkers.
I understand that the devs want to make money, so they make paid options the best so more people will buy them. But in a game like this where most of the missions to get different vehicles are long, tedious and difficult at times is more than enough reason to buy a paid vehicle. I think there should be a free to play vehicle in every category, that is on par with the paid option. Although it should be the most difficult to unlock.
Another thing that would be fine is if paid options just had an extra unique abilities. For example: if the f35 was the same in terms of performance to the harrier but in addition it has the ability to drop bombs. That would still make the f35 better, since it is the only plane that can hover and drop bombs and honestly deal with ground targets the easiest. It would be plenty of reason to buy it. And since you don’t have to make the long grind of level 30 to unlock it, it’s still a good choice for those who don’t want to go through that grind.
This way paid options are technically still the “best” but there is a free alternative options that free to play players can use with immense effort put into the game to grind for it. This way players aren’t discouraged to pvp. Because sometimes it really does feel hopeless when a decent p2w player enters the lobbby.
@@SuspiciousAnomolybros become grammarly lol
@@SuspiciousAnomolyyeah no you are fucking crazy, aa counters planes anyways, for 30 dollars I expect a plane that dusts everything, and it does.
The Abrams-X's tank shell is more advanced so that is why it take more damage. 02:15
The only thing in my opinion the AbramsX has over the T14 is the javelin launchers
I think thats one of them but not the most important
The real life armata has ATGM's so the devs could add that
@@shakti203abramsx would be not worth it if that happened
@@SarvesanOfficialit alr isn't
@@ilcarlino752yea i can Beatles abramsx with a t90
You know, the VCAC and BTR-80 are both just like the M3 Bradley, how?, Well, firstly, BTR-80 has a 30mm explosive cannon and a machine gun, just like the Bradley, and VCAC has wire guided missiles, just like the Bradley, so really, the Bradley is just VCAC and BTR-80 combined, really the only difference is that the BTR-80 is amphibious (at least it will be in the future) and VCAC has more wire guided missiles, so yeah.
Você usou que tipo de maconha? Não tem nada a ver, BTR E VCAC e M3 e uma coisa totalmente diferente é Outra inclusive aonde as rodas aparecem? Na lua? Sem conta oque o BTR será anfíbio eo VCAC eu carro anti tank leve Que é movido sobre rodas e apenas possuem as mesma arma do M3 Bradley eo Adtas a diferença é que a do VCAC é feita pra tanks
ITS A VAB RAHHHHH
They are both awesome. The vcac is mainly super OP and ill make a video on it soon too
@@LordBloxxxxxx Ok, I’m excited for the video about the VCAC.
the bradley actually has a 25mm auto cannon but yeah
Hint if you hit a tank on back it will do maximum damage
My biggest problem with the T-14 is that it's really fucking tall and fat
It's supposed to have all around good protection with ERA in the front and sides, but the devs clearly know nothing about tanks
Ye man great vid I deffo think that longer videos are now required but keep it up 😊
Thanks! Will do!
mm caliber in tank cannons does not mean anything. it just means the size of the shell, not the damage
2:23 the shell size does not always matter, statistically tanks do not have health bars in the real world and other stuff affects damage such as the length of the barrel which can improve the velocity of the shell and the type of shell American shells being better than the Russian equivalent here
Well tbh I think T14 is better cuz its free to play
Awesome video!
T 14 is like a bradley and a maus at the same time fr
Awesome vid mate. I don't even need the abx now that I have the t14
:)
I love T-14.
2:15 the cannons do have a difference in size but that doesnt necessarily mean that bigger = more damage, as irl most (if not all) modern tanks use APSD rounds which are basically smaller rods than the diameter of the barrel and use a sabot to keep the pressure behind the round, ps i dunno if 5mm gonna make that much off a difference (thats what she said 💀)
yeah I agree with that, heres the thing, I would have mentioned that in the video itself but it was already gonna be long and least according to how war tycoon does it they do more damage based on the size in most instances
@@LordBloxxxxxx ah yeah, i get what u mean
While they both shoot apfsds shells 5mm means they can fit more powder behind The shell, they can also fire a bigger dart which should create more spall
You mean APDS? I pretty sure they use APFSDS now
@@EnderKnightGames mb bro, i dont look into tanks that much, im more of an aviation guy 😅
T-14 IRL: Please don't shoot me 🙏
LOL
Me when I dont have AbramsX: YAY I HOPE T-14 IS BETTER
Me getting gifted AbramsX after 2 minutes: I hope abramsX gets a buff.
Wait what was going on at 2:39?😂😂 I paused it there and…I can’t even explain it😂😂
The reason the T-14 does not do as much damage is because (From real life) Its shoots an inferior shell
Hi bro, excellent video, keep it up, but, in the last video I asked you if there was a new code, to which you replied yes, could you tell me what the code is? Thank you :)
Ik theres a code but I dont know what it is sadly
@@LordBloxxxxxx oh okay thx
Another thing to point out if that the explosive machine guns on the abrams x are way faster then the ones on the t14
little correction: explosive machine gun on the abramsX does NOT fire faster than the t-14. the abramsX has a slow explosive machine gun and also a normal machine gun. while the t-14 has a fast explosive machine but none with normal bullets
@MoazRBLX thanks for pointing that out but even the e turret on t14 is slower then normal bullets and the abrams x has medium e bullets and fast normal bullets so I think that's why I said that but I phrased it wrong and it's a very small speed difference(like 0.3 seconds) between the t14 and abrams x so I still think abrams x takes that point
The ABX has some difirent types of shells for its canon and thats why it has more damage than the t14 Armata
T14 takes more damage to rpg etc on the sides its more durable at the front on the sides it takes 4 rpg shots on the side for abramsX it takes 5 rpg shots I think they might of slightly buffed the abramsX
Yeah But its important to test damage for the same place plus people mostly go for front hits. Either way I think abrams got slightly buffed, in fact all tanks did and ill make a video on that soon
@LordBloxxxxxx ah ok I didn't realize all tanks got buffed thanks for these informative videos
@@LordBloxxxxxx bro theres a difference why
Abram x better dmg when 120 barrel and t14 125mm
Its cuz they use different shells
The Abrams x has XM360 rounds. That’s why it deals more dmg
2:10 the size of the gun has nothing to do with the damage it’s the velocity of the shell, 3:38 it does more damage shooting in the side, that’s why you t-14 was faster in that situation 5:30 the t-14 has explosive reactive armor which has no advantage over Normal shells, only high explosive shells, which is the kind of round the rpg uses 8:00 bro really hit the barrel💀💀💀 he’d have won by a lot if he were to hit a better spot
yeah I agree with all this, I didnt also include some of it as I didnt wanna make the video 20 mins
The T-14 Armata (At least irl, since ERA doesn't work in this game) uses Monolith ERA, which is highly effective against Kinetic Energy munitions (APFSDS, APDS, AP, APHE), not only Chemical Energy munitions (HE, HEATFS, ATGM, HESH)
Russian ERA from Kontakt-5 and above have been known to be effective at significantly reducing the amount of penetrating power that KE rounds can have.
@@generalschmidt7429 it’s effective e against the ke which is true however it protects even better against HEAT, which is the round the rpg uses.
I gotta admit it’s true most of you stuff you said
@@sebastianaxdalstergaard1959 Yes, despite its high effectiveness against Kinetic Energy munitions, it is still around 2 or 3 times more effective against Chemical Energy munitions!
By the way: th-cam.com/video/zK77-8kJ69c/w-d-xo.htmlfeature=shared
A simulated example of an APFSDS round hitting a T-90M protected by Relikt ERA (Maybe, the creator didn't say what ERA it is, but it looks like Relikt because of the two plates flying inwards and outwards when the ERA exploded), which is less effective than T-14's Monolith ERA.
(This is not 100% accurate to irl but it is accurate enough)
The reason why the AX has more damage is because of the cannon name believe it or not it just makes it way stronger
Yeah
Is there a way to change the sensitivity of the tank scope?
I dont think so
Make a video about AK12 vs HK416 pls
ill have lots like that coming
Would u rather have a tank with explosive guns (no addition other bullets) that have normal 125mm ammo OR a tank with a XM360 120m with a explosive gun that also fires additional other bullets and a javelin?
of course the second version, thats kind of what the video explained
??, all you did here was some fancy wording, XM360 being the name of the 120mm gun of the abrams X, and you can make the T-14 also look as good as the abrams by saying or a tank that has a 2A82-1M smoothbore 125mm gun with an automatic remote controlled explosive machine gun. The difference in damage is simply because of the difference in the APFSDS shells that they have, they both use APFSDS, but unsurprisingly the one that costs 1500 robux deals more damage, now of course the Abrams X is better because of its higher DPS, more DPM when it comes to the explosive machine gun, and its inclusion of a javelin will of course make the abrams better.
@@Sande1976 ur technically wrong. The irl abramsX’s program says they’re gonna use the XM360 120mm shell, and all fancy word stand for something
@@Guygotphonecall I'd love to see a source saying that the XM360 is a shell, because all sources I've seen are saying that the XM360 is a light-weight 120mm gun, and yes the fancy wording does stand for something, the non-fancy wording of what you said. What you basically said was: Would you want to have a tank with a 30mm explosive autocannon with a 125mm smoothbore that fires APFSDS, OR a tank that has a 30mm explosive autocannon with generally better shells than the Armata's 30mm, with a 120mm cannon that also fires APFSDS, and a javelin equipped.
@@Guygotphonecall I am not denying the fact that the Abrams X is (blatantly) better than the Armata, because it is! But what I'm saying is that you used some fancy wording to make the other tank look better when they virtually have the same features but one with amplified performance (better performance) and the addition of a javelin and the other having the same thing except its lacking a bit of DPS, DPM and a javelin.
Fun fact in real life t-14 has 152mm like kv-2.
imagine if t14 was this good irl
Brp i havent gotten any pil barrels its so hard to get them
realistically the abrams x shot is stronger because its a futuristic tank with new type of rounds that can do way more damage than a 2010's tank
i guess its true, size doesnt matter like someone's gf said
LOL
when ru going live???
Not sure
@@LordBloxxxxxx maybe if your in europe arount 11:00?
The bradly is way beter than the armata, The bradly is very very underrated is literally the best tank of the game
Coming from me, the guy in the vid, i actually couldnt use the jav, i spammed as much as i could but still it couldnt shoot the jav so idk
Oh u couldnt??? Then when abrams will then that puts it even higher above it
Is the m1 abrams obsolete now?
No,but the M1 afther the T-90 updatr become much harder to use. but still good.
Its harder to use yeah but still good
If it’s against a t90 it’s mainly skill based or whoever fires the first shot. With a t14 your just dead
The t14 cannon uses the same gun as the t90 and t72 so they will do the same damage
T-90A and the T-72A both use the 2A46M gun, albeit different versions (2A46M-1, 2A46M-4, 2A46, 2A46-2, blah blah) but the T-14 uses the 2A82 gun, and in-game the guns do different amounts of damage
Anyways it's worth to grind t14?
Yeah, best free to play tank
K ty ❤ ! @@LordBloxxxxxx
@@LordBloxxxxxx12 oil barels.
too easy operation. i made it very easy. the tank is too good for the easy task
I have both tanks and i like Abrams x more cause i spent money on it so yea im gonna stick with abrams x
also consider that AbramsX is 1499 robux and T-14 is free which shows what a masterpiece T-14 is
big truth
thats why the t14 needs a nerf, a tank so easy to get shouldnt be as good as a 15 dollar tank
T14 doesn't need a nerf devs need to make it harder to get like 30 oil barrels or smt else@@thekir99
Hey I'm sorry I can't join the faction because im co-leader in my faction
I think the biggest advantage that the abx has over the armata is blowout panels, like 99% of time abx users are absolute dogshit but even if you destroy their tank they just jump out and finish you off with an rpg, it's super annoying.
Yeah i agree, thats a huge strength, personally i dont relly on it as abrams has so much fire power to use
The vcac is op and can kill abrams X in 4 shots and also the t-90 is better than the abrams X and the t-14 is better than 90 so it’s the new mbt
The t90 is not better than the abrams X
ITS A VAB AKSHSHWJNA
@@santinocapelli6523 bro are u dum the t-90 is literally the same thing but without a javelin but that barely does s### and missile disruption
i'd love an explanation on how the T-90A in anyway shape or form is better than the abrams x
abrams x deals more damage, has a better APFSDS shell than both of them, has an explosive machine gun with stupid DPM and includes a javelin, although the T-90A does have a great passive and good main gun DPM, it doesn't beat the abrams X besides it's reload, albeit the T-90A having I think the fastest reload in the game for a tank, although that needs confirmation, but other than that it has the same hp, worse DPS on both the machine guns and main gun, and lacks a javelin.
The reason AbramsX has more damage is because of yhe modern XM360 I guess...
Ngl bradley is the meta in my eyes cus it easily destroys everything if u have a bit of skill
I agree
:)
The weapon caliber is not the only factor, there’s speed of shell, density of shell, penetrating power, velocity, etc
Am still confused why it has an explosive machine gun to this day
ITS A MAGAZINE NOT A CLIP (technically it’s the barrel overheating cause no reload animation)
T-14 def protected by Stalinium
Yeah basically no tank is surviving a Javelin to the roof, the armour is to thin and the Javelin has to much penetrating power
Ok bu bai am sticking with the Abrams X I still haven’t unlocked T-14 lmao
Yeah some things with the abrams x tank make no sense. However with the javelin point it would be stupid if it one shot any tank tho
What are ur PC specs?
Its too long to list
Did they nerf Abram’s x?
They are more likely to buff it than to nerf it
Devs did meth not math in balance
Best balance changes fr. 125mm does less than 120mm
*Devs trying to be realistic so they decide to make T-14 more durable to be real life accurate* and then fucking up in numbers and making 120mm stronger than 125mm
I find that a bit funny as t14 was done correctly with the blow pannels yeah
The velocity, penetrating power and density of the round might be better 🤓
well the abram x has more damage than the armata even tho the armata has a larger caliber due to the tank shell that was fired from the cannon, because lets be real t-14 irl is prob some propaganda that its stronger than even the abrams [like the shell could be KE, or something from the future since it isn´t developed yet] + yeah the fact that a tank from future can be beaten by a tank that can´t even compare to the leopard 2a7
yeah I agree it could be propaganda, at the end of the day reason why i was surprised with stronger abrams cannon was also because on average in this game they base damage on size
@@LordBloxxxxxx i get it
actual shell fired:
shell velocity:
a bunch of other statistics that go into how much damage a cannon should do:
this guy: "125mm bigger than 120mm, more damage 🤓☝"
like, no true offense meant but that's kind of dumb to think that's how it works
I dont think thats how it works, im basing what I say on past things developers do and they seem to on average follow the pattern on bigger the size the stronger the shot
@@LordBloxxxxxx im sure it's taken into account, it's just not something they display, why else would a T-72 (keep in mind that thing is from the early cold war), that has the same caliber as a T-90, do far less damage ? because the shell fired is a lot weaker, the gun and ammo are older, etc.
ngl they should buff the t14 or nerf the x with the javelin
am playin both but only bcs of the javelin the abramsx has soooo many advantegets over every other tank
like it makes more damage but the most annoying part is that the abramsx can locate u with that stupid thing and is instand battle ready
while u just chill, and 2 secs later ur dead bcs you have not even seen him
or for me the most annoying part in the game is that when western tanks blow up, they dot blow up.
i know that the tanks burn out in real life and dont make boom but why the hell do u surive that hell inside an abramsx when ur tank died ?!?!
while when ur in an russian tank u instandly die
my oppinion is that u should die in both vehicles when ur tank dies
I agree that abrams is really op but again its game pass and the fact russian tanks die is because russia doesnt use blow up pannel technology
@@LordBloxxxxxx yeah but have u seen an abrams go boom ?
u shouldnt survive it
Bro u dumb as 😂😂@@bennifischer3871
I think the T14 has a worse shell than Abarms X X
that's why
I think the t14 has more health but it doesn’t have as much armor as the Abrams x
Good point, well in game they count it all as health
Abramsx is still better cause it have 2 javelin launchers and is faster
1 javelin
i wonder how the game will look like in 2025
Same
@@LordBloxxxxxx hey i got banned from war tycoon discord server for...30 days... but i'm happy to know what's going on thatns for your videos!
leo and bradley and the abrams x has simply better rounds. t-14's autocannon fires fster than the abrams x (and bradley's) and has a bigger capacity.
I think you meant autoloader
No@@Sande1976
@@cherylmark7 so you mean the explosive autocannon on the top of the vehicle? if so the abrams x's autoloader is significantly faster than the armata's one
The autocannon does NOT have an autoloader.@@Sande1976
Wow me saludas please
Whats up :)
what about afordability
T14 no contest of course
T14 vs t90?
Someone already done that
@@LordBloxxxxxx ok
Pls KV 2
imagine a madness suit!
on rebirth 12
gives you 500 HP and a minigun!
imagine that
yeah
How is it realistic the t14 in the game don’t even have rocket that can disrupt javelin ,how ever IRL it has the system that can disrupt javelin or any anti-tank guided missiles🙄🙄🙄
I don’t think you know what you’re talking about. It’s called APS not “rocket” and it can’t shoot javelins down only deploy smoke grenades to hide it from the javelin.
Bro, I destroyed a T 14 in an M4 Sherman
Than the t 14 player must have been very bad lol
@@LordBloxxxxxx He might forgot about this, because usually these day people don't think about this in my opion, that i see in a few month ago.
I got the t14 In a day
how dare u bro u killed me on the abrams i see u TH-camer
XD, bro can I not kill everyone now LOL
Also great to see you watch :)
also can u gift me abrams X my user is (pollex495)
Russian bias doesn't exist...
Abrams-X gana
2:15 Bro get basic knowledge about tanks, caliber doesn't matter that much in modern tanks, it's mostly the shell itself.
Correct but according to in game statistics and how the developers do it usually it should do more damags bigger the mm
@@LordBloxxxxxx But following this logic the t-72 should deal more damage than the AbramsX so not really.
bradley solos both no difficulty
Hell nah
@@LordBloxxxxxx hell yeah dude! Maybe you’re just bad with the bradley. I kill t14s and abramsx all the time with the Bradley
Car
👇
🚗
i got my ass kicked by t14 armata while im in my abramsx
Abrams x is better. You just need some strategy
@@LordBloxxxxxx i did attack first somehow my aim decides to be horrible
#makemausrealistic
Ye
Make maus realistic? Let it be it already balance to me, if it going to be realistic then its gonna be much slower also modern tank can penetrate it easily since you want it realistic
@jordysiahaan8440 at realistic, its top speed will be like 11mph
im 10th liker
Awesome
Wait what was going on at 2:39?😂😂 I paused it there and…I can’t even explain it😂😂