The things we can now do are just amazing. I just finished creating the best Bubble Nebula I've ever made using data shot when the moon was at 100%, 97%, 84% and 74%. The moon is no barrier with this technique. Go to my post page to see it.
Wow, what a game changer. I use OSC so that might be more prone to moonlight leaking in to my images, but within a few years I'm definitely going to be upgrading my rig to do LRGB (very exciting!!).
I am almost certain you can use this with an OSC camera, you will just need to be a bit more careful with acquiring your base information as OSCs are a bit less efficient with color filters and you cannot do strategic filtering with them.
Brilliant! I wonder if some of these techniques would apply to light polluted skies... Except that you won't have the chance to shoot good high frequency sub frames.
I would guess you can use the technique from light polluted regions but I live in the backwoods and have no practical means to test this. But, as you said, you would not ever be able to get good base (low frequency) information for your foundation from an area of light pollution. However, if you are out of town, what you could do is shoot one or more targets and acquire your base information, then get the high layer information for those targets later from your home under light pollution. That's only an educated guess yet. I have no way to test it.
@@SKYST0RY That's very interesting, it gives me ideas to get better images while imaging most of the time from my place. In any cases I'll dig into your videos about frequency separation. Keep on your good work!
I know of no reason why it won't work with an OSC, but I haven't experimented with an OSC yet. But ultimately an OSC is just a mono camera with a Bayer in front of it (sort of like permanently affixed RGB filters.) Since the HF is very resistant to moonlight, you should be fine capturing your high layer information with an OSC with a UV/IR cut filter. But since an OSC is much less efficient in shooting specific frequencies or color ranges of light, you should capture your base information under darker conditions. Any moon phase under 50% - 60% should be fine.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 80 | คู่เอก "รักษ์ vs ยอดนำชัย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ckLMRorsMeY/mqdefault.jpg)
Just started this hobby and I'm impressed by the level of sophistication that is possible today.
The things we can now do are just amazing. I just finished creating the best Bubble Nebula I've ever made using data shot when the moon was at 100%, 97%, 84% and 74%. The moon is no barrier with this technique. Go to my post page to see it.
this is fascinating, exciting, mind bending and also somewhat daunting... i am engaged though!
Pretty interesting and amazing approach. Have to give this a try
Wow, what a game changer. I use OSC so that might be more prone to moonlight leaking in to my images, but within a few years I'm definitely going to be upgrading my rig to do LRGB (very exciting!!).
I am almost certain you can use this with an OSC camera, you will just need to be a bit more careful with acquiring your base information as OSCs are a bit less efficient with color filters and you cannot do strategic filtering with them.
Very informative. Liked very much.
Brilliant! Thank you.
Nice video
Brilliant! I wonder if some of these techniques would apply to light polluted skies... Except that you won't have the chance to shoot good high frequency sub frames.
I would guess you can use the technique from light polluted regions but I live in the backwoods and have no practical means to test this. But, as you said, you would not ever be able to get good base (low frequency) information for your foundation from an area of light pollution. However, if you are out of town, what you could do is shoot one or more targets and acquire your base information, then get the high layer information for those targets later from your home under light pollution. That's only an educated guess yet. I have no way to test it.
@@SKYST0RY That's very interesting, it gives me ideas to get better images while imaging most of the time from my place. In any cases I'll dig into your videos about frequency separation. Keep on your good work!
so wont work on a broadband target then. on osc
It should work. Just be a bit more careful capturing your base information.
will this work on a broadband target using only uvir ?
I know of no reason why it won't work with an OSC, but I haven't experimented with an OSC yet. But ultimately an OSC is just a mono camera with a Bayer in front of it (sort of like permanently affixed RGB filters.) Since the HF is very resistant to moonlight, you should be fine capturing your high layer information with an OSC with a UV/IR cut filter. But since an OSC is much less efficient in shooting specific frequencies or color ranges of light, you should capture your base information under darker conditions. Any moon phase under 50% - 60% should be fine.