My Intro to TP-Link Omada 101

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.ค. 2022
  • amzn.to/3Qqs6Ud
    Omada Router: amzn.to/3QzK5YG
    Omada WAP: amzn.to/3u9VOFD
    Omada controller: amzn.to/3QTADRe
    (As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases)
    🔥These links support my madness🔥
    💲 NordVPN: www.bmbsucks.com
    💲 Members-Only Punishment: bit.ly/bmbmembers
    💯These are my other Socials💯
    🔹Twitter: bit.ly/BMBTw
    🔹Instagram: bit.ly/bmbinstagram
    🔹Tik-Tok: bit.ly/bmbtock
    🔹Discord: bit.ly/BMBDISCORD
    ✉️P.O. Box for Mail✉️
    Byte My Bits
    P.O. Box 77
    Haysville, KS 67060
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 133

  • @MarcoFaroukBasir
    @MarcoFaroukBasir 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I started with Omada a few years ago because of cost and availability of Ubiquity equipment. It works, it's cost effective too and I've deployed about six system so far never having any major problems and all are still running.

  • @meseone920
    @meseone920 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I have ran both Omada and UniFi for over a year together. UniFi at home and Omada at my cabin. They both serve their purpose and I can tell you they are similar and enjoy both of them. I feel the UniFi is extremely expandable and has protect/phone and more that can be intergrate and I love it for my house. At the cabin I didn’t need all this and the Omada served as way to have the core of what was needed, allowed for network expansion for coverage as well as using a similar interface.

    • @daltonschrader8328
      @daltonschrader8328 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I prefer to not have all my eggs in one basket with how Ubiquiti likes to kill stuff off plus I refer to use my own hardware.

  • @JeremyCulbreath
    @JeremyCulbreath 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Been running Omada for just over a year. As a network professional, I've been an Ubiquiti fanboy for a long time, but like to be familiar with options. So far, the wireless gear and switches have been rock solid. The routers are comparable to the lower-end Unifi offerings. They hold up well enough for light users, but pale in comparison to "real" off-the-shelf routers, much less something like PFsense. However, the hardware controllers are trash. I've tried both hardware controllers and they are inexplicably buggy. But the software controller has worked flawlessly. And the cloud access to it hasn't let me down, yet. Since learning it and working out the kinks, I've installed several Omada setups (from 1 to 160 access points) and I've received no complaints (well, out of the ordinary). Unless somebody has a predetermined preference or use case requiring more horsepower, Omada brings a lot of performance vs. cost to the table.

    • @ClayGravil
      @ClayGravil 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you put me in touch with the client that is 150+ access points? As a network professional, I'd really love to discuss with them how it is going, what their working environment is, and the ease of management they've found with Omada.

    • @JeremyCulbreath
      @JeremyCulbreath 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ClayGravil It's an old hotel. To be honest, I wanted to go Ubiquiti with them, but they elected to save money. Wall APs for the rooms and better APs in common areas. A few meeting spaces, but no big conference center, so I wasn't worried about density too much. They aren't a tech savvy bunch. No smart hotel system. And they just change the wifi password weekly. I was honest about my concerns going in, but they've been happy so far. Been running for about 6 months.

    • @ossito
      @ossito ปีที่แล้ว

      How are you running the software controller...proxmox ?

    • @boldstardex
      @boldstardex ปีที่แล้ว

      quick question: can the omada controler software non omada access points along with omada access points installed?

    • @user-oj4iz9gb9m
      @user-oj4iz9gb9m 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😀SINCERE thanks for advice about software subscription of tplink omada instead of the hardware.

  • @TechySpeaking
    @TechySpeaking 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    You can run the Omada controller as a Docker container, you don't need the physical controller if you don't want.

    • @MrSephkeene
      @MrSephkeene 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yup, I run mine in a Linux Container (LXC) under Proxmox.

    • @berns2264
      @berns2264 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Do you have any tutorials?

    • @drooplug
      @drooplug 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Works on windows, too.

  • @danielkroft
    @danielkroft 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Had a slight freak out thinking someones in my computer! Then yeah realized you got the same wallpaper as me! It's soooo cool!

  • @slip0n0fall
    @slip0n0fall 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Really looking forward to seeing the rest of this Omada series!

    • @willyhillstrom7816
      @willyhillstrom7816 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Every time someone says Omada, I think Obama, and it's been a lot of fun.

  • @Walterz930
    @Walterz930 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really like the look at the omada line up I really wish I heard about them before changing 3 networks over to unifi also hopefully one day they bring out a rack bracket but maybe just 3D print one to hold them together

  • @patricknelson
    @patricknelson ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As far as the controller, I’m also “basic”. I regularly administer servers for work, super familiar with a love using Docker daily. But personally, I actually love the simplicity of just having a dedicated hardware controller. But YMMV. My setup isn’t yet complicated enough to warrant taking advantage of the benefits of removing hardware and consolidating things into a single server with virtualization and etc. For me having the dedicated hardware adds a bit of “set it and forget it” simplicity since then you’re not thinking about making sure the host server is online, the docker service is running, the container is running, the container is up to date, etc. Sure you still need to make sure the controller is updated, but still. Seems easier to me. 🤔

  • @Cruiser-nr3pl
    @Cruiser-nr3pl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    When I decided to switch from Spectrum to my municipality's new fiber internet, I decided to go with a better setup. I bought the router you have, the controller and their 5 port POE switch to run the 3 TP Link access points in my house. It's been almost a year now and have had no issues whatsoever. My previous cable ISP, I had to reboot every couple of weeks. I actually got the Edge Switch 10? first as I was thinking of using them but their other equipment was never available. No regrets with TP Link. Does more than I need it to be but if I ever decide to expand my network, good to know this can handle what I might want to do.

    • @uiopuiop3472
      @uiopuiop3472 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      DONOT EAT THE CANDY IN THE TPLINK BOC. ITAS NOT CANDY BUT STICKYAPAD

    • @ppha0244
      @ppha0244 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you dont mind me asking, Which model 5-port POE switch do you use?

    • @Cruiser-nr3pl
      @Cruiser-nr3pl 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ppha0244 Don't know the model # offhand, sorry. If I can remember when I'm home later I'll get it but it's only a couple years old at this point so can't have changed too much from any of their current model #.

  • @jackofclubz
    @jackofclubz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have this basic setup and I got to tell you I love it.

  • @7MBoosted
    @7MBoosted 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I can't speak to the router, but I use Omada stuff behind a pfsense firewall and I am happy with it. Been using it for about 2 years now.

    • @robcrowderdesigns5406
      @robcrowderdesigns5406 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm setup the same way ..I have, Omado switches, Access Points and Controller in Docker, I do own their router ( the one in this video ) but when I set it up, it seemed lacking compared to my pfsense. Spoiled with pfSense

  • @peterg4527
    @peterg4527 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome Video love the hardware centric videos the best! When are you going to tackle the new Plex server I am really looking forward to the Loki upgrade

  • @Random_How-tos
    @Random_How-tos 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! I might buy one now. Completely off-topic, did you film this on your iPhone 13 pro?

  • @davesradiorepairs6344
    @davesradiorepairs6344 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You may call it "prosumer" or "high-end" but at a $100, it can't be beat and works like a charm...

  • @testengineeringdaily1957
    @testengineeringdaily1957 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    not going to lie the mowing the lawn bit earned my sub

  • @videowatcher495
    @videowatcher495 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I think there is a docker that has the Omada controller software built in s you no longer have to use the hardware controller. I have seen people download it on their unraid servers and on their main machine.

  • @awarepenguin3376
    @awarepenguin3376 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    No wireguard? thats the future of VPN. Incredible performance.

    • @teemuvesala9575
      @teemuvesala9575 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Business solutions tend to move slower. WireGuard is great, but business solutions will move to it only once it matures.

    • @adogonasidecar1262
      @adogonasidecar1262 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Obviously, it's available now

  • @Highqman1974
    @Highqman1974 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    There is zero issue with running Cat 5e at the length they give in the box. I cant understand why people wanna constantly bang away at that. 10g will pass with no issue up to 45m. Ive got North of 30 Omada systems right now in the field (oldest system is 2 years old). Very good, reliable stuff. All working with the free cable between components. Dont whine about the free cable. Its fine. Youll be ok....

  • @xisop
    @xisop 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I'm running the controller in a docker on my Unraid server. For now only using the ER605v2, really hoping to get my hands on the TL-SG3428MP and a EAP610 very soon to expand my setup. Really love the ecosystem and the full 1Gb WAN I pay for

    • @galsherp6173
      @galsherp6173 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      unraid has built in vpn, does that work with such routers?

    • @xisop
      @xisop 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@galsherp6173 I installed wireguard an duckdns for vpn. Only had to open 1 port for wireguard in the firewall and had no issues. Using a Windows VM as daily driver, connecting through Chromebook. At home I don't need VPN, away from home I activate the tunnel and have all the luxury of a powerful "pc" and full network access.. Only have to figure out how to connect through DNS instead of IP

    • @galsherp6173
      @galsherp6173 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xisop if u use duckdns u have an dns...?

    • @xisop
      @xisop 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@galsherp6173 I mean connecting to .local or any other device that can be accessed that way. I have to connect to IP of the server with a port if needed. When you have a bunch of devices scattered across 5 vlans/subnets this can be a hassle

  • @onlyzach1
    @onlyzach1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does Omada give you a VPN option that you can assign certain devices to? It'd be nice to assign an Apple TV 4K to one for example. I know pfSense can do it, but kinda scared of setting that up with Ubiquiti. Would like to see all the options the VPN can do on it. These things look like mini switches heh. Great video as always!

  • @BUMMERSBARBQ
    @BUMMERSBARBQ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Glad to finally see you make a video about real tech again..........and not batteries.

  • @peterfolchi1032
    @peterfolchi1032 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use omada at home and i love it, never had issues with it!

  • @anulearntech
    @anulearntech 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have been trying to find out if the is a way to connect my external 4TB USB drive to the network. My router doesn't have a USB port. The internet is telling the only practical way is by using a huge NAS. I just want 1-2 USB ports with the network device. Let me know if anyone has a solution.

  • @kuyavenzinfovlog
    @kuyavenzinfovlog ปีที่แล้ว

    can you check the VLAN if will pass through the MESH network

  • @TheRubernck21
    @TheRubernck21 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im sure that you can 3d print something to make it rack mountable as well.

  • @AngryGibberish
    @AngryGibberish 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would love to see the mobile wan back up using the USB port. I've been looking for something like that.

  • @adriankomadowski
    @adriankomadowski 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    iperf3 tests: firewall & routing please
    does it have some DPI or IDS/IPS?

  • @bladerunner2639
    @bladerunner2639 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    how it different from regular router ?

  • @kwbarron
    @kwbarron 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I use all Omada stuff for my home network, and I run the controller in Docker on my unRAID server. For the money, you really can't beat it.

  • @thisfeatureisbad
    @thisfeatureisbad 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh, I just bought the old ER605 model. If I knew there was already a new revision with a USB port.

  • @mesbaisers9468
    @mesbaisers9468 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    does it need a static ip for the internet? how about a dhcp internet connection will it work?

  • @SomeRandomGuy407
    @SomeRandomGuy407 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do they make you purchase a hardware controller? Why not build it into the switch? Or even give you a option to buy it then flash the firmware on the router with it? Sure I'm not getting something but don't understand why they make it a 2nd device when that's not needed.

  • @scholziallvideo
    @scholziallvideo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi,
    perfect video.
    Omadacontroleller is the same GUI that Ubiquiti use only with other icons ^^

  • @kirbydepaz1697
    @kirbydepaz1697 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have ER605 but no usb port. Why's that?

  • @daltonschrader8328
    @daltonschrader8328 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the tplink gear with lifetime warranty. But i only run pfsense anymore.

  • @ArturKania
    @ArturKania 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I personally wouldn't consider this router/firewall for business use. One of my main requirements is the ability to run multiple lans/subnets across it's interfaces. Those appear to be link layer switch ports instead of accessible interfaces.

  • @user-vk8xs3fl2b
    @user-vk8xs3fl2b 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤ thank you very much🎉

  • @masterchef2408
    @masterchef2408 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’d like to see what your VPN speeds are with this

  • @thelaughterchannel
    @thelaughterchannel ปีที่แล้ว

    Whats the model of those tplink sir?

  • @richmax13
    @richmax13 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hahahaha!! I love the dumb humor in this video!! Lmao

  •  2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The rack mount is really a missed opportunity imho. At least TP-Link could have made it so that it was separate available piece. Maybe a bracket where that router and the controller can be mounted together on a 1U bracket or something. Only thing that's vague to me is if IGMP Snooping is supported.

    • @uiopuiop3472
      @uiopuiop3472 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      IGMP is for multicast noobs like Telekom and other noob ISPs

  • @aaro_n
    @aaro_n 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the omada controller dockered on a raspberry pi to control my router and ap.
    My er605 doesn't have a USB port though!

    • @EdVelez
      @EdVelez ปีที่แล้ว

      The V2 hardware version came with the USB. You and I have the V1 ER605 with no USB

  • @OPTIMUS6LTR
    @OPTIMUS6LTR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can confirm those candies are delicious

  • @kiddicarus
    @kiddicarus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:05 -->😄Thanks for that too!

  • @endgame4318
    @endgame4318 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do I setup with Omada if I have a Wi-Fi/modem combo from my ISP? Do I replace it? Do I set it up in bridge mode? Or do i not need to the Omada router and use my ISP modem?

    • @JamesAutoDude
      @JamesAutoDude 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah you always need the modem part, but you can turn off the WiFi from within the settings of that ISP box and then it's just a modem and router with no WiFi
      Then you plug in your new WiFi to that and go from there. If it has bridge mode, even better if you plan to use a new router (like the one in the video)

  • @fxallo1
    @fxallo1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you want to try the mikrotik hexs router

  • @justbored3.14
    @justbored3.14 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    forgive my ignorance but what does this device do ? is it a hardware solution for plug and play vpn setup ? or is it hardware designed to run software that provides vpn

    • @dan_hitchman007
      @dan_hitchman007 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a prosumer/light business network ecosystem (router, switches, wireless access points with mesh or hardwired backloading) where you can have VLAN's to segregate sections of the network and block certain clients from accessing the router and controller (in the home... ie guests and/or kids). You can set up basic VPN's too. This level and above tends to have better data throughput than your basic consumer network gear.

  • @EdVelez
    @EdVelez ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Got the router, controller, 2 switches and 2 AP's running in the house. I actually switched from being a Mikrotik fan over to TP-Link. Go figure!. Its very stable but...be warned when you go and adopt your hardware to your controller. The controller does not do EVERYTHING that the individual pieces do. I am hoping that TP-Link will eventually add in all the functionality to the controller so I can keep everything integrated and not have to go stand alone. Thats a pain. If you go from stand alone to controller...you lose the settings...if you want to go back to stand alone, you lose the settings...There has been some minor bugs with DHCP reservations and others things that TP-Link is still growing through...Probably not much different when it comes to growing pains that Ubiquiti is going through. Pricepoint...I love it...full roaming...I love it...Stability...I love it. Support....gotta beat up TP-Link once in a while on the forums to get them to move.

    • @angrynerd2103
      @angrynerd2103 ปีที่แล้ว

      You arent the first iv seen to say that there are differences between controller and standalone. One of the forums I was looking at even mentioned a setting that was preventing full throughput. Im curious, for a smaller network like just router, switch, and 1 ap would you use the controller or is it better to have more options and use the standalone interfaces?

    • @EdVelez
      @EdVelez ปีที่แล้ว

      @@angrynerd2103 Small networks really dont need the controller at all. Actually any size network does not need the controller. But for the price point, I just decided to go with it.

  • @winger46146
    @winger46146 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I run the EAP's, big fan of them

  • @ikkuranus
    @ikkuranus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's not a toilet paper holder but it is something that should be flushed

  • @westonbean9674
    @westonbean9674 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I luagh cause I just the modem dew.days.before you posted this..

  • @donaldhiles_k9sgz428
    @donaldhiles_k9sgz428 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool 👍

  • @LokiScarletWasHere
    @LokiScarletWasHere 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Should probably consider a better provider, or not using a VPN service at all if you're just using Nord because of their claims of privacy. VPN services are only really any good for bypassing geofilters, and providers like Nord where they expect you to install their own app and their own driver could be stripping SSL.

  • @mixtube_4916
    @mixtube_4916 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this wifi router?

  • @YugimanTeam
    @YugimanTeam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a great ecosystem..my only issue is no mdns

  • @darrengreen7906
    @darrengreen7906 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Desktop background...I have the deep field JWST picture.

  • @DaveSomething
    @DaveSomething 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    if you build it, they will come...
    I thought about vpn router, but chose to use a pi instead. wouldn't mind a better firewall though, can't use pi for that as it doesn't have the bandwidth capabilities.

    • @jasonpowell7704
      @jasonpowell7704 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The pi cannot be best for the value on VPN

    • @DaveSomething
      @DaveSomething 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jasonpowell7704 seems to work fine

  • @ShinyTechThings
    @ShinyTechThings 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I didn't see holes for ears so you would just put on a shelf in your rack.

  • @AndyRay
    @AndyRay 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is there an ongoing cost/licensing on a monthly or annual basis for Omada and Cloud management?

  • @MegaSunspark
    @MegaSunspark 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Won't be my friend for too long ...doing that, sticking things into where it doesn't belong !

  • @sjoervanderploeg4340
    @sjoervanderploeg4340 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You need to ugprade that thing to a newer OpenWRT right away, that thing is running OpenWRT 14 with a 3.x kernel and that is VERY INSECURE!

  • @ShinyTechThings
    @ShinyTechThings 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    With side projects my wife says I never finish anyth...
    🤦‍♂️🤣

  • @Kelekona_808
    @Kelekona_808 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:30 Forbidden black liquorish included in box ;)

  • @SH-fc7xp
    @SH-fc7xp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just use a mikrotik. Cheap, very powerful, it's a literal swiss army knife

  • @Alan.livingston
    @Alan.livingston 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Go the Blue Heeler

  • @JamesAutoDude
    @JamesAutoDude 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wish I would've found this before trying stupid Decos 😑

  • @ahmedtalaat27
    @ahmedtalaat27 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this stupid thing this controller must be embedded inside any AP then then router is the VPN gate for this whole system but TPlink prefers to put it separate for some reason.!

  • @enquiries.kbaphotography8501
    @enquiries.kbaphotography8501 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    print a rack mount ;)

  • @jeffherdz
    @jeffherdz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jason, For the cost of everything that you need. Would it not be better to just get a Unif Gateway Pro and be done with it ?
    P.S. I love my Gateway Pro.

    • @ConfidentGrips
      @ConfidentGrips 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or just run pfsense on a 1u

    • @jasonpowell7704
      @jasonpowell7704 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Still cost less than a unifi gateway pro. About $350 for everything including controller and access point with switch to get you up and running. Plus in stock

    • @jeffherdz
      @jeffherdz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jasonpowell7704 Had no issues getting mine. and only paid $50.00 more for one device.

    • @meseone920
      @meseone920 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You could, I run both UniFi and Omada. UniFi at home and Omada at my cabin. Both have their place in the industry and I can tell you that in my use case at the cabin this was a better option as it was slightly lower cost, expandable as needed and easy to use as the interface is close to UniFi.

    • @jasonpowell7704
      @jasonpowell7704 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jeffherdz you only paid $50 more for unifi?

  • @KhurramSSiddiqui
    @KhurramSSiddiqui 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    5:00 minutes into the rant. Yawns, writes this comment, and leaves at 5:46 mark

  • @dougfox5312
    @dougfox5312 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The problems are their APs are huge and hideous

    • @logikgr
      @logikgr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep, they're similar design to Xirrus APs fugly AF. Cisco's WiFi6 Catalyst APs are alright, but their 3700 series APs looked pretty cool, too. Aruba APs look alright, and yeah, their flagship 6 AP-555 is massive. Their new 6E series AP are kinda cool with the geometric texture and compactness, except for the gloss finish.

    • @brucebondi6104
      @brucebondi6104 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@logikgr They now have mini APs, they are awesome.

  • @caseycard
    @caseycard 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    sticking with my PFSense

  • @Hephaestus93
    @Hephaestus93 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    TP-Link copies Unifi OS even down to the icons... Thier hardware is garbage and thier software has all the same problems that last years version of the Unifi OS had. Check how often TP-Link updates firmware. Check how easy it is to get support from TP-Link. Almost no firmware updates and zero support. Cash that check they gave you, finish the videos you agreed to and run, dont walk, run.

    • @tylertuthill5121
      @tylertuthill5121 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I guess we all need money, but I won't touch any of this video series with a 10 foot pole. The information is contaminated/scrubbed as it's obviously bought and paid for bullshit.

  • @TechySpeaking
    @TechySpeaking 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    First

  • @DarinCates
    @DarinCates 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    He thinks he is funny ..... why?

  • @manslayerdbzgt
    @manslayerdbzgt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    They're basically the same TP-Link basically copied the unifies old interface and there's way less products on TP-Link Armada and the access points don't look good and they're too big but it's not bad it's still a good service and everything like that is still good

  • @jasonme3557
    @jasonme3557 ปีที่แล้ว

    ubquity is junk

  • @arshadyousef
    @arshadyousef 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks cheap compared to UniFi

  • @keyboard_crip
    @keyboard_crip 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You made this video boring

  • @jonathan.sullivan
    @jonathan.sullivan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    First, S*c* it Nate.

  • @scubieman
    @scubieman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    lets go brandon!

  • @jhonatanhg8026
    @jhonatanhg8026 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    supported a imageline product... what a joke, and also tNice tutorialer save function is a joke... even the save function in "Microsoft Word" is better...

  • @fredcailloux2526
    @fredcailloux2526 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Useless...1Gb network isn't good enough today, 2.5Gb, 5Gb and10Gb are already there and more futur proof! Wifi 6/6E/7, Cat6/6E cable and IEEE 802.3bz equipements is what we need. My provider offer fiber internet access up 1,5Gb and I have a 10Gb port on the HH4000 modem/router they rent me. You can get 2.5Gb switch and network card for pretty cheap today and you don't need to dump all your 1Gb equipement tomorrow they still work. New purchase mean "upgrade" getting 1Gb equipement is not an upgrade...

    • @Alan.livingston
      @Alan.livingston 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s an upgrade because it was free from tp-link