Hello Ladies and Gents. Your positive comments really are appreciated. I create these videos in my spare time around a full time day job. Each one takes around 60-70 man hours of effort to produce, even longer on complex videos like Schweinfurt-Regensburg and the Battle of Midway. My goal is to reach 100k subscribers by the end of 2020. If you enjoy The Operations Room, it would be awesome if you could please subscribe!
Hello sir, love your videos I watch them on my break when at work, you have a very good skill of narrating certain battles in order and consequences of certain events. Keep up the great work! Tom
this is a very informative video, finally I could understand the extremely complicated refueling plan! But I think there are few comments to be made: 1- the runway in Stanley wasn't long enough for high performance fighter/bombers, and the British naval blockade already prevented that the equipment needed to support those fighters could reach the islands. 2- Argentine forces managed to deploy extending plates for the runway, but those were used to create a servicing platform for the Hercules and other transports, allowing faster loading/unloading procedures. The Hercules flights were barely enough to provide for the garrison, there was no room to provide for a fighter squadron with fuel/ammo/spares on top of that. 3- the crater was repaired fairly quickly, and the runway continued to operate until the last day. 4- the were Mirages left to overlook the capital from the very beginning, not because the BB raids. 5- the only success of such missions was the destruction of Skyguard radar, and a huge psychological impact, but not much else. This is a very good analysis on Black Buck, lots of information: www.thinkdefence.co.uk/operation-black-buck/analysis/ cheers!
@@martindione386 One could make similar observations regarding the Doolittle Raid, but very few would claim that it had negligible impact. Sometimes the mere fact that an enemy has the nuts to attempt something so brash is all it takes to force a combatant to reconsider his courses of action.
@@johngalt3568 as I said, it had some material effect and a huge psychological effect, but those missions had two clear objectives: disable/destroy the runway, and the main air surveillance radar, and those were NOT achieved.
I remember standing on the filght deck of HMS Antrim during one of these raids. I remember watching a Vulcan fly directly overhead. I cant remember now if it was heading North or South. Anyway many, many years later I was at the Vulcan's final appearance at Prestwick airport. Martin Withers was meeting with enthusiastic kids and signing autographs. I stood in line and when my turn came, he saw a considerably older fan, who didn't want an autograph. I said to him "I was on the Antrim and you flew right over my head" He said "And"? I replied "I waved, you didn't wave back" He burst out laughing and said "I was a little busy".
I also met him at RIAT one year. He seems genuinely bemused by the attention he gets for what he considers just doing his job! I'm sure the book royalties sooth is objections :D
No wonder that when the drogue(?) snapped they got outta there as fast as they could. But they were kind enough to donate some of their own tea to the leftover tanker👍
It’s said that British pilots can I crease their fuel consumption as much as 10 times when under pressure, much like an afterburner, so that 3 week supply was quickly drained.
I was the Wireless Operator on Ascension Island during the raid. There were a few mess-ups with planes not using the correct callsigns as went into a new day (cryptography etc). Which led to the radio calls for air to air refuelling by the Vulcans to be ignored. I was sworn at by an incredibly angry Vulcan pilot when he landed, but I was backed up the RN operations director who tore the pilot off a strip for forgetting to update the callsigns. Like everything else in real life things don't go to plan. One thing stuck out in my mind was extremely excited senior RAF officer hugging the crew of the Vulcans as they came into the Operations room (portacabin). It was in hindsight extremely brave of Vulcan crews and very British in its let's give it a go attitude.
no solo fue un bombardeo que fracaso...creo que 3 mas FRACASARON , solo murieron 9 soldados Argentinos y la pista fue operable hasta el fin del conflicto , los Argentino con su creencia que los TOMMYS no reconquistarían las islas Malvinas ...no se prepararon adecuadamente...será la próxima y sin la dama de hierro y que el infierno la tenga bien a resguardo.
This was such a British operation. Totally under-equipped and relying on one good old boy to make it through. I picture them twirling their mustache and drinking tea on the Vulcan.
The fuel problem was twofold... (for Black Buck 1 only). 1/ All the aircraft flew in formation at the same altitude, which meant that the Vulcan was not flying at it's most fuel efficient altitude. and.. 2/ The Vulcan was kept constantly topped up which meant that it was flying at maximum weight for most of the way. ( More weight means that more fuel is required). This was immediately realised and was corrected for the later Black Buck missions. Having said that a good, accurate, and informative video clip! .
Interesting point, well made. I forget which black buck mission it was, but the vulcans refuelling probe snapped completely! and had to divert to Rio de Janerio (I think).... with a live shrike missile that had failed to jettison. WHOOPS!!
Not only was it a bombing that failed...I think 3 more FAILED, only 9 Argentine soldiers died and the runway was operable until the end of the conflict, the Argentines with their belief that the TOMMYS would not reconquer the Malvinas Islands...I don't know They prepared properly...she will be next and without the iron lady and may hell keep her safe.
Imagine being stationed at that runway and the alarm for enemy planes wakes you up. You get out your bunk, expecting a few harriers from the carrier to harass you, only to find a massive bomber has flown thousands of miles to wreck your day.
you don't seem to appreciate the damage 1000lbs of explosives can do. The rest of the bombs landed on the troops and equipment stations at the airfield.
Aaron, it wasn't planned to be suicidal. It was however very risky. If you read Lt. Cmdr Sharkey Wards excellent book "Sea Harrier Over the Falklands", he is very critical of the RAF effort and, with some authority states that the Harriers could have done the job just as well and used literally millions of gallons of fuel less than the seven Black Buck missions consumed. However, the point he seemed to overlook was that because the RAF could bomb that far from home it did make the Argentinians withdraw fighters to protect the mainland, which may well have made a difference but of course we'll never know for sure. In that respect, it was a strategic move that helped to stack the odds as much in the British favour as possible, always a good thing in war.
@@theflyingfool It was in no way suicidal, it was just very risky, like all military missions. The refueling plan was the product of some egg-heads fevered imaginations though!....British pilots don't do suicide missions, they carry out orders.
@@theflyingfool They didn't meant for it to be suicidal, but the level of complexity to pull it off nearly made it so. So many things could go wrong (and did) that nearly resulted in failure.
@@creativeamerican8811 they were officially retired and definitely overloaded. They had no idea how much fuel they would use as it was totally outside anything it had ever done.
HobgoblinUK Honestly it makes me shudder. Not a fan of flying but always say I reckon I’d be ok on a military aircraft outside of combat... just not a fan of commercial air travel, however, the thought of being in that Vulcan flying the length of the Atlantic.. I need someone to hold me... I’ve thought about it too much.
I was stationed at RAF Alconbury at the time of the war. Every morning, we'd receive classified briefings on what was happening. It was fun going home after shift, turning on the BBC, and seeing how wrong they got their stories.
It's a shame the BBC didn't think before letting slip that 2 Para were attacking Goose Green a few hours before they were due to. Whoever made that decision should've been shot.
not realy the air strip was repaired and operated til the last day o the conflict. the susecuent operations whit anti radiaton misisles have more impact.
@@anuvisraa5786 I'm talking about the success of the logistical side to complete the mission in this case. The impact of the raid itself was pretty minimal you're right but it did result in a withdrawal of the fast jets back to the Argentinian mainland so there was some benefit.
Besides, it was one massive muscle flex by the UK that certainly degraded Argentina's confidence in the war. I thinkt he political repercussions had much more impact than the physical ones.
@Real Thailand Once again for the intellectually impaired, I'm talking about the success of the logistical operation so the mission could be completed which was a remarkable achievement given the resources available. Learn to read.
@Real Thailand The aim was to get the bomber to the Falkland Islands so it could deliver its payload,and back in one piece. This was successfully achieved so clearly it was a logistical success. What are you not understanding here?
In operation Black Buck Six, one vulcan broke his fueling nose and was forced to land in Rio here in Brazil. You can find pictures of the pilots enjoying the night in the city together with the Brazilian pilots who intercepted them with F5s. Better than drifting in a inflatable boat at the Atlantic Ocean.
The emergency landing did cause some problems, as the Vulcan in question still had an American anti-radar Shrike missile on board. Officially the USA wasn't supporting the British and reports of British bombers armed with new, high-tech American weapons could've caused issues. I believe the Brazilians kept the whole thing quite in exchange for free spare parts for their British helicopters they had purchased earlier.
That was the story put out at the time. The story around the RAF was that Britain had pre-positioned a Shape (Nuke) in the region. In either case the Brazilian government refused to let the aircraft, and whatever it was carrying, leave until the MoD agreed to purchase the Tuccano aircraft. An awful aircraft that needed extensive modifications before the RAF could use it.
@Vlodec Apart from the fact one ship can't be in two places, what we have are _vastly_ more capable than what we had back then. If we sent our fleet back in time is likely that this entire mission could have been completed with ⅓ of the capital ships we took, just a single Type 45 can defend vast stretches of sea against ship, aircraft and missile attacks. Combined with a carrier with CAP and crows nest capability, nothing gets near.
@@gbonkers666 But it did teach us a harsh lesson about CIWS. So sometimes you have to take what you can from a bad situation. If you look at ships _everybody_ build now, it's all about layered anti-air defense, CIWS, point defence missiles, fleet air defence and networked sensors and fire control. Just a single Type 45 now provides all of that on it's own, more than a Type 42 and Type 22 combined.
The amazement and dedication of the RAF pilots didn't just stop here. I was stationed on the Falklands shortly after the war to build the runway (as well as other tasks), which was still only big enough for a Hercules c130 to land, carrying military equipment and our letters from home. Two Hercules would set off from ascension and the first Hercules would use half its fuel then refuel the second before turning back. However, the first Hercules still couldn't make it to the Falklands, so a Victor bomber would then refuel the Hercules for a second time. The problem was, the Victors slowest speed was still faster than the Hercules fastest speed, so both planes had to climb to a set height then go into a dive as they refuelled (it's called 'tobogganing). The pilots use to say that they felt as if the Hercules would shake apart, and they did that three times a week until the runway was built to be able to land bigger aircraft some months later.
I was a navigator on those C-130 tankers. To get the freighter CMk1 to Stanley took 2 refuellings. Initially we used a Victor for the first bracket and the KMk1 Herc for the second, and eventually 2 C-130 tankers. The mission to do the second bracket took 17 hours out and back. Once the Stanley runway had been extended and covered in AM2 we took the tanker Hercs down to the Islands to support the Harriers and F-4s, but there were no larger aircraft in the inventory back then. Eventually when Mount Pleasant was built in '87 the Tristars took over the Air Bridge and didn't need refuelling, but we didn't buy the Tristars until a few years afterthe war.
Its a standard "Do-or-die" attitude common in Europe at that time. Both western nations and the eastern block were standing on the shoulders of the giants their fathers who fought in WW2 were. And they approached any task given as it was the Battle of Britain/Siege of Leningrad itself as they learnt that that is how things are done ... That attitude is of course far gone, bar few exceptions here and there.
The Vulcan that took part in this raid is on display at it’s original home base at RAF Waddington which is just down the road for me. Just shows how innovative the RAF are. This was widely considered an impossible task but they still carried it out. Makes me proud to be British and can’t wait to join the RAF
Who ever dreamed up the deck-shuffling refuel was some kind of Rubic's Cube logistics genius. The last minute swap of fuel between tankers was also a grand exhibition of intelligence, perseverance, and adaptation under duress.
The runway was repaired within hours, but was camouflaged to look busted during the day, and operational at night. The last C-130 flew out of it in the early hours of June 14th. The runway wasn't extended, reinforced, nor used for Mirages ever, which was very idiotic.
@@dukedepommefrites8779 In hindsight cruise missiles would've been the best weapon to use on Port Stanley. 6 cruise missiles would've put the runway out of action for much longer, and without endangering friendlies.
@@killman369547 It seems like that could be tricky as cruise missiles use side-scanning terrain radar for their navigation. They'd have a lot of featureless sea to cross before fixing on the island, and then possibly not have enough maneuverability to turn inland to hit the runway (not sure of the scale from the video.) I can't remember the operation, but I've seen another video where cruise missiles had to take a circuitous route around a flat expanse of desert so they would have some mountains to follow to the target.
I saw an interview with that guy on a cable TV show... He's totally straight during the whole thing, but the things he's saying are unbelievable... It'd been ten years, since they had done a single flight, of mid air refueling... they dragged the equipment out of the back of old hangars were it was buried... then they ran practice flights every day, trying to re-learn how to do it..... Then the flight back, the way he told the story, was unintentionally hilarious, and breathtaking... Very calmly, he says "Well, it'd been at least a decade, of training flights, and I literally never saw the fuel gauge below a half, at any moment... Now here we were, on fumes, wondering, does this gauge even work, when it's this low?? Is there any reserve built into this thing???" I remember just shaking my head and laughing at the TV screen, like, are you kidding??? omg. And then the rescue flight turns back due to low fuel... Unreal... I just found your channel. You do a great job on these. These are very well done, and very good.
I remember watching a documentary about this and the scramble to rebuild the in-flight refueling system. Apparently they were missing a critical valve component and were trying to work out how fast they could fabricate a new one when one of the engineers found the part being used as an ashtray in the crew mess.....
When asked to do something your aircraft was not designed for. And when working with what you've got. The armed forces do seem to rise to the challenge. I suppose operating as the RAF does, punching well above its weight and doing so with limited budgets. Working around problems is the norm.
this is why when i went threw training in the British army my section comander always told us " this is the British army and its a small badly equipped army for a reason. it forces you to do alot more with alot less and hence makes you a superior warrior the war only stops when we run out of hot water coffee and tea"
I was stationed in Vegas during the 70's and we hosted the Britts for a joint test force and they brought a fleet of Vulcans that we refueld in the air several times during the operation.
There is no aircraft that sounds quite as incredible as the Vulcan. I've been fortunate to see it fly a dozen or so times before being completely retired
Same here mate, first of all you get that quad bass rumble tearing your very molecules apart as it releases the brakes, then as it glides past, that distinctive blowing over the top of a bottle sound, howling as it screams skyward. Inspiring stuff. I remember it's final RAF service year, when they really opened up the engines and threw it around like a fighter one last time. I thought it would be the last time I saw her. Until she was restored and flew much more conservative displays for a few years. Still, that sound. Never forgotten. I would love to have experienced a whole squadron taking off.
@@rowgliLikely be extinct too. If a whole squadron took off, there probably wouldn't be a UK for them to return to. Some things should remain wishes. ;)
If Operation Black Buck 1 could be compared with any other mission, I'd put it in the same bracket as the Doolittle Raid on Tokyo in 1942. Both involved theoretically near-impossible expenditures of resources with the same high level of risk versus reward - the the case of the Doolittle Raid, the risk was of losing the USS Hornet, one of only three US fleet carriers in the Pacific at the time, which made it *almost* indispensable. However, the reward for the risk of the Doolittle Raid would be the inflicting of a massive shock on the Japanese high command - psychological rather than physical damage, since the boast in Imperial Japan at the time was that the home islands were inviolable. Having sixteen B25s turn up seemingly out of nowhere to drop bombs on a totally unprepared Japan was a massive humiliation for a race of people for whom pride and 'face' were integral. The damage to Japanese pride far outweighed the physical damage the bombers inflicted, and all of the bombers were lost after running out of fuel. In an attempt to put a brave face on the debacle, the Japanese propagandists tried to pass it off as the 'Do-Nothing Raid' but, in fact, they were shocked to the core. Likewise, the Argentines tried to present Operation Black Buck 1 as a pinprick at the end of a massive expenditure of resources. They tried to point and laugh at the single bomb crater in Stanley's runway and suggest that, as all the other bombs missed the target, the raid was a failure. The book on the raid, 'Vulcan 607', makes clear the RAF's objective was 'runway cutting' - bisecting the runway and halving its length - rather than the wholesale destruction of the island's main lifeline. The objective all along was to place one bomb on the runway to damage it and Operation Black Buck 1 succeeded in doing just that - damaging the runway just enough to deny its use for fast jets. The Argentine engineers patched the crater within 24 hours, hence their belief the raid was an expensive failure. However, they botched the job. The first aircraft to touch down at Stanley after the raid - an Argentine C130 Hercules - ran over the filled-in crater on its landing roll and the crew discovered in doing so that the runway was no longer flat and level because the Hercules slewed off the runway and ended up on the grass. It was quickly realised that any attempt to land or take off with a Mirage or Skyhawk on such a surface would end catastrophically. Black Buck 1 had achieved its objective. Only after the war was over was the crater properly repaired.
You've got wrong information, the crater wasn't patched, the opposite, the argentinians threw more mud over the crater to make it look bigger because they knew that the british were looking with satellites. The runway at Stanley was used by the argentinian aircrafts till the end of the war, with the last Hercules taking off in the middle of the night during the Tumbledown combat was going on, so the runway wasn´t destroyed. Plus, the argentinians gave up the idea of landing combat aircrafts in the runway BEFORE this bombing, in april. The effect was psychological. The fear of another Vulcan bombing was constant. And This was the only succesfull Black Buck mission, and it failed to actually destroy the runway...
@@sanignacio1999 My primary source for information on the raid was Rowland White's book, "Vulcan 607". He talked extensively to the RAF personnel who planned and executed Black Buck 1 and it was made clear that destroying the runway wasn't the objective - cutting it in half was the plan. They loaded the Vulcans with leftover WW2-vintage bombs and planned to drop them at an angle across the runway in the hopes of putting at least one of them onto it and rendering it inoperable for fast jets. They didn't know what Argentina's plans were for the runway at Stanley, only that it was the only runway in the vicinity that theoretically COULD accommodate Mirages and Skyhawks. So the plan was to shorten it by half and that's what they did.
@@elennapointer701 It was a success for the british, but did nothing against the argentines. Why they didn't even try to extend the runway before this bombing raid is puzzling. It was fully operational at night until the end if the war though.
Correct. The fact that all dog fights took place with fast jets coming from the mainland tells us what we need to know. Much further to travel and more fuel burned giving far less time to possibly dogfight and use your gas-guzzling afterburners, fewer sorties per day also as further to fly.
This was a brilliant presentation and demonstration of this epic mission. I live up the road from RAF Waddington and see XM607 parked up by the A15. My Dad, who sadly recently died, used to run the Royal Engineer Field Support unit in the 80's and 90's. At one point the base got hold of the last Victor to refuel the Vulcan and my Dad's unit built a second platform so the two aircraft were situated next to each other as a memorial. But some pencil pushing spoil-sport in Whitehall said they weren't allowed two gate guards, so the Victor was towed off and dismantled. Fortunately my Dad was able to salvage a couple of cockpit displays for me from the Victor, one of which I still have to this day His unit shared a hanger with XH558 when they first arrived and I got to often sit in the Vulcan whenever I visited Dad at work. Such a special aircraft
In the early 1970s, I lived in Bellevue Nebraska...the then-home of SAC headquarters at Offutt AFB, and got to see lots of different aircraft at their annual air shows. One of the most amazing ones I ever saw was a Vulcan bomber. With their delta wing design, they could come over at such a low speed that they seemed to vibrate to keep from falling out of the air, then make a turn a few miles south of the field and come back over at close to 500 mph and everything in town would vibrate. :-D
Isn't this the mission where the guys scavenged parts for the bomber from museums and junkyards and even one part was an ashtray? Gotta give it to the British, they go for it and usually hit it for six as they say. Salutes from the United States Navy 🇺🇸💞🇬🇧
I think you're right about the ashtray. It is said there was a conversation between the brits and the Americans who's airbase on ascension the mission was run from. The fuel was supplied through the Americans and when the brits gave them their requirements the American commander said " you can't possibly use that much fuel" the reply was "we're going to give it a bloody good try" I can't be certain it is true but i hope it is. And for what it is worth. The Americans did help out logistically with this mission so respect to you.
After one of the Black Buck missions, the Vulcan XM597 was on its way back to Ascension when it had a problem in its aerial refueling system and was unable to refuel. RAF's contigency plan was for the planes to try an emergency landing in Brazil if such situations happened. So the crew kept radio silence and headed to Rio de Janeiro, where they would only contact the Brazilian authorities once they found the closest airport. However, they were spotted by the radars as soon as they entered Brazilian airspace, so the Brazilian Air Force sent two F-5 Tigers to intercept the bomber, the Vulcan's crew was forced to break radio silence and inform them about the fuel problem. Then the bomber was escorted to the Galeão International Airport, where it was grounded and its missile AGM-45 was apprehended. The Brazilian Government only allowed the XM597 to fly back to UK seven days later and under the condition that it wouldn't be used in further missions against Argentina during the war.
That was the most labour and resource costly 1000lb bomb ever. Well done! Thanks for explaining the refueling sequence so well. I had no idea what it took. Too bad they didn't have two birds on target for that first run.
@@Dave5843-d9m they did but one of the Vulcans had to turn back when the cabin wouldn't pressurize. I remember when I was a kid i went to an air show here in Winnipeg and the RAF showed up with one or their Vulcans. Blew my mind mind when it flew low altitude over the crowd. That wing. The size. The noise! I never forgot it. As I think about it i imagine they could never get that close to a crowd nowadays. My all-time favorite plane.
From the snags that occurred in the later stages of the outbound flight, particularly the electrical storm, & a snapped refuelling drogue it looks like the abort of the 2nd Vulcan was fortuitous to getting the single Vulcan onto target & safely returned. It was remarkable that the Vulcan wasn't hit by an Argentine air defense battery concentrated on a single aircraft. Even more remarkable was the slide rule planning (without sophisticated computing aids in 1982) to achieve all the many buddy-buddy, & bomber refuelling contacts necessary to get the Vulcan to its target. A terrific achievement by the Victor Operations planners at HQ No 1 (Bomber) Group
There is a Vulcan at the castle air force base museum in Atwater California USA...despite its coming close to bein obsolete at the time of the raid you cant ignore its beauty..well done chaps.
@b52gf16c i have not heard of that. However the base was still in operation at that time. Far as the museum's existence im not sure. Will look into that. Very interesting. Cheers
@b52gf16c yes it is..i was there 6 months ago with my grandson. It never gets boring there. I posted a few vids of my visit on my channel if you care to check them out. Thank you for the information.
I remember reading in the local paper, during the conflict, about the removal of the part from the Castle museum Vulcan. Don't remember seeing it in the national news.
I remember a sign up against the Exocet missile on display at the manufacturer's stand at the Farnborough Air Show after the Falklands War had ended. It read: "Combat Proven"
Black buck missions were actually several,this was just the 1st,the succeeding ones were anti radar. They just ddn't recieve the same publicity even after the war.
@Hammer 001 Taking fast jets off the islands is effective. Taking out following radar stations, then a foll up bombing strike on the Argentine garrison was entirely effective. British servicemen didn't die from potential action from those assets, its a complete success of tax payers money.
@@1993Crag Only one radar station was eliminated in the succeeding Black Buck raids. Two Black Buck raids were scrubbed, Black Bucks Two and Seven did not hit their targets (the bombs on Seven had not been fused correctly anyway); Five only did minor damage to their long-range radar and Six failed to acquire it and so only destroyed a single fire-control radar. Furthermore, Six was diverted to Brazil due to a refueling failure and nearly caused a political incident involving an American missile still aboard the plane. Black Buck One was successful, as it achieved its objective, but I would argue the subsequent Black Bucks were not worthwhile given the Herculean effort to use bombers on the edge of retirement in a mission the RAF never planned for, and only existed to give the RAF an opportunity to participate in the conflict and to improve morale.
I remember a Vulcan flying up NE Valley, Dunedin, NZ... Not sure when, but probably the 70s. Absolutely no doubt due to it's shape. In camouflage colours, it looked like a giant moth.
These were incredible examples of professionalism and bravery. Not enough can be said about the maintainers restoring systems. One part of a refueling system was found being used as an ashtray in a ready room!
In September 1981, Argentina actually applied to the UK Government to buy an unspecified number of Vulcans. The export of a single aircraft was approved, but intra-government correspondence at the time noted its potential suitability for bombing the Falklands. Three months later, Argentina invaded the Falklands and the sale was off.
I once attended a talk at an airshow hosted by one of the crewmembers of XM607, sadly I couldn't remember who it was, but it wasn't Martin Withers. Really good talk and I learnt so much. His talk was definitely the highlight of that Air show as sadly it was in poor conditions and 90% of the flying plan was cancelled due to extremely poor weather. His talk was brilliant though and totally worth it.
The noise of Vulcan XX558 on maximum thrust pulling up from low level after completing its bombing run to turn about and head home must have been truly awesome.. Proud to be British.
one of the funniest fact's I learnt was that a mechanical part essential for the mission was sitting in the staff room been used as an ash tray ha ha ha good ol Britz!
The RAF didn't have a whole lot at their disposal, but just like they've always done- they found a way to go above and beyond their known capabilities. Incredible story. Thank you for sharing.
My uncle was the Air Electronics Officer on the Primary Crew for this mission, ironically his crew had flown out on XM607 but switched aircraft as they had problems with the fuel tank. He got to in on the second raid.
Just before the Vulcan came near the Falklands a jump jet flew near Stanley to make sure the argies had the radar on as they expected an attack. But not the Vulcan attack. This enabled the Vulcan to lock on to the signal given off by the enemy radar.
s g I remember it well, having served with Bomber Command and stationed at RAF Waddington and RAF Cottesmore in the 1960s, still seems like it was a short time ago, but decades have passed by so quickly. RAF Waddington has an interesting history should you wish to examine it.
To modern military minds, this seems like such an improvised, 'poor man's strike' while World War II Lancaster bomber crews would be amazed by the capabilities of the planes involved in this raid.
A truly amazing mission. I did not know it involved so many refueling stages and tankers, refueling tankers. And great courage and skill by all involved.
I was in Lincolnshire at the time and remember Vulcans changing their flying routine. For a while a singleton would leave Waddington and later run back up along the edge, making a low pass across the station with an explosion to mark it's passing. It was clear that someone was soon going to be served notice that they were not out of reach. In due course a heavily laden departure was heard and then seen climbing out on an unusual southerly heading. On TV the band of the Paratroop Regiment had played "Don't Cry for Me Argentina" as they marched down to the docks.
I was in Olinda Brazil and saw two Vulcans roaring over that day. For a 11 year old boy and fanatic for war jets it was quite a scene. Thanks for posting this video.
Nice graphic! Short, sweet and to the point. There is a 47-minute video called XM607 Falklands' Most Daring Raid that covers the story in more detail, and with personal anecdotes, but for a "CliffsNotes" version, this is good!
@Hammer 001 There were no harriers there at the time. Had that airfield not been compromised as it was, Argentina could have based Super Etendards there and history is altered. Anyway my comment was about the personnel.
@Hammer 001 That would be extremely fortuitous - having the task there the day the Argentine invaded. Perhaps keep your personal remarks to your friends and family.
@Hammer 001 Sir, the first attacks by Sea Harrier FRS.1 aircraft, of 800 Naval Air Squadron, took place AFTER the Black Buck One bombing raid. David Morgan, one of the Sea Harrier pilots, suffered a damaged tail plane due to cannon fire.
@Hammer 001 we agree with your statements totally. Knowing a lot of the RN Sea Harrier pilots as we do, if anything the Black Buck raids hindered the offensive effort.
I mean, it was more of a propaganda mission than a strategic one. Like the Doolittle raid, it was more meant to show off the capabilities of the RAF than to actually deliver a strategically-significant payload.
I remember we loaded the 1,000lb bombs on a train at the ROF depot - they were placed on the floor of the wagon because there was no time to crate them up. The train started off and I could hear the bombs clanging like bells. We had to stop the train and we fitted wedges between them the bombs. Glad to know they arrived at there final destination!
FAntastic animation, and a couple of details I didn't know about.... how we achieved this is quite astounding, given the complexities and odds stacked against. But we did pull it off.... sadly, those days of bravery are gone, and I have no idea what this country is coming to.... thank you for a splendid account... I loved the background music, in great taste, and it did not distract from the narration.... give you 10 / 10
I've got nothing against the British over the falklands war. The only thing that makes me scratch my head is why not just use cruise missiles to hit port stanley instead of risking a bomber and crew? This seems like an awful lot of work for one bomb hit.
As you rightly say, I think that was a demonstration to Argentina that we could reach them if necessary. The RAF’s day’s or should I say nights of wrecking enemy cities was over but they still must have had a formidable reputation.
Do you really think it's reasonable to compare an aircraft that first entered operational service in 1997, 15 years after this mission took place, with an aircraft that had been operational since 1956? Come on mate, be fair.
Refuelling midair, looks damn hard on a good day. This whole operation just blows my mind. The animation is much appreciated.
5 ปีที่แล้ว +15
And the RAF learned their lesson and maintain a fleet of long range bombers to this day.
5 ปีที่แล้ว +9
@@bobsemple7660 Sorry mate, was being sarcastic. They currently don't have anything even close to the old Vulcan's capabilities let alone a better long range platform that could effectively support far flung territories.
@@Tomartyr We now have two air craft carriers, we never had proper air craft carrier as we sold the design for them to the yanks and promised that we would never build a full size carrier again. Which is why the QE and PC are smaller than the nimitz class. However, war has changed since then and you have drones and long range missiles. All what you need to do nowadays is press a button and you can win half the way straight away.
You have NO IDEA how long this distance is. If you're an American, it's like flying from NYC to Los Angeles, back to NYC and back to Denver in the middle of the night, over open ocean. And I thought my career washing dishes on an aircraft carrier was dangerous 😆🇺🇸💞🇬🇧
Excellent video, straight to the point and very detailed and informative. I'll spread the word around and disable my adblocker for you. Thank you for your time and effort.
@@yungy7942 come on, we were fighting a war half a world away, against a country with a massive home advantage and larger military numbers and we still won. Pretty impressive, dont you think?
@@yungy7942 Did you not listen to what was said at that start of the video? It was the longest bombing run at that time, covering a total distance of around 7,800 miles. The B-52 only manages 8,800 at the moment, and that's only in the last 30 years due to the numerous refits and upgrades that it's undergone over the years. At the time of this operation it's limit was around 6,500 miles.
Was @ Army ROTC Advanced Camp @ Ft. Riley, KS when the Falklands War happened. Not having any portable devices, we all cheered when we were told the Argentines surrendered.
That's because they are easily modifiable. Old systems can easily be swapped for new systems with little down time. It's the same reason the B-52 is still in service as well and might become the first plane to stay in active service for 100 years.
I'm sorry but I wholeheartedly disagree. There were hundreds of civilians on that island that lived there. Do you just leave those civilians to be annexed by a foreign power?
Thank you for such an excellent video. I've seen this story told a number of times but to actually see the graphic representations of all the aeroplanes involved in that mission is truly amazing, it's such an eye-opener regarding the distances and logistics. I am incredibly fortunate to have seen the XH558 at RIAT a few years ago and I think there's something rather awesome about four engined Avro's, such as the Vulcan or the Lancaster. As a slight side note, I was recently flying from Dublin to London and discovered the aeroplane I was on was a BAE146, AKA Avro RJ45, and I mused to myself it was nice that Avro were still flying four engined aeroplanes over the skies of Europe! ;-)
This raid always makes me proud to be ex RAF. Although I was 12 at the time of the war, but 8 years later I finally done my impossible mission and signed up. However, I think that this was the only time in recorded history since WW2, that officers actually deserved to be respected. I have met several ex forces that served during the Falklands both marines and paras. All of whom never talk about it, they talk with their eyes and by that their eyes are in tears. When you see grown men with tears in their eyes and not able to speak, you can pretty much tell that the Falklands was one hell of an experience for those involved. Per Aruda Ad Astra always.
I was serving in RAFG at the time. Whilst Recruit Training SWINDERBY, we use to see Vulcans from SCAMPTON and WADDINGTON, overhead being air tested, that was something to see, them being put through their paces. I became an RAFP dog handler and spent many a cold wet night sheltering under a Vulcan. A bomber with the grace of a fighter, never be another aircraft like her.
Hello Ladies and Gents. Your positive comments really are appreciated. I create these videos in my spare time around a full time day job. Each one takes around 60-70 man hours of effort to produce, even longer on complex videos like Schweinfurt-Regensburg and the Battle of Midway.
My goal is to reach 100k subscribers by the end of 2020. If you enjoy The Operations Room, it would be awesome if you could please subscribe!
Hello sir, love your videos I watch them on my break when at work, you have a very good skill of narrating certain battles in order and consequences of certain events. Keep up the great work! Tom
this is a very informative video, finally I could understand the extremely complicated refueling plan! But I think there are few comments to be made:
1- the runway in Stanley wasn't long enough for high performance fighter/bombers, and the British naval blockade already prevented that the equipment needed to support those fighters could reach the islands.
2- Argentine forces managed to deploy extending plates for the runway, but those were used to create a servicing platform for the Hercules and other transports, allowing faster loading/unloading procedures. The Hercules flights were barely enough to provide for the garrison, there was no room to provide for a fighter squadron with fuel/ammo/spares on top of that.
3- the crater was repaired fairly quickly, and the runway continued to operate until the last day.
4- the were Mirages left to overlook the capital from the very beginning, not because the BB raids.
5- the only success of such missions was the destruction of Skyguard radar, and a huge psychological impact, but not much else.
This is a very good analysis on Black Buck, lots of information:
www.thinkdefence.co.uk/operation-black-buck/analysis/
cheers!
Thanks for the hard work. It's truly appreciated.
@@martindione386 One could make similar observations regarding the Doolittle Raid, but very few would claim that it had negligible impact. Sometimes the mere fact that an enemy has the nuts to attempt something so brash is all it takes to force a combatant to reconsider his courses of action.
@@johngalt3568 as I said, it had some material effect and a huge psychological effect, but those missions had two clear objectives: disable/destroy the runway, and the main air surveillance radar, and those were NOT achieved.
I remember standing on the filght deck of HMS Antrim during one of these raids. I remember watching a Vulcan fly directly overhead. I cant remember now if it was heading North or South. Anyway many, many years later I was at the Vulcan's final appearance at Prestwick airport. Martin Withers was meeting with enthusiastic kids and signing autographs. I stood in line and when my turn came, he saw a considerably older fan, who didn't want an autograph. I said to him "I was on the Antrim and you flew right over my head" He said "And"? I replied "I waved, you didn't wave back" He burst out laughing and said "I was a little busy".
I also met him at RIAT one year. He seems genuinely bemused by the attention he gets for what he considers just doing his job!
I'm sure the book royalties sooth is objections :D
The question is did you forgive him Micky? 🙂
@Nick Maclachlan Smac 19/22 pal.
Absolute class 😄
Brilliant story, thankful to say i were able to walk around XH558 that day, I recorded the sad departure if you want to have a watch 😪
“We’re off” absolute class. The navigator used a map off the northern hemisphere upside down to calculate the route. True Legends.
LTrain 45 the bit that says Northern Hemisphere.
LTrain 45 🤦♂️
You can guarantee his exact words were “fuck it, we’re off.” Like deciding to go to the zoo, even though it’s raining 😂
Not having any of that foreign map nonsense. A sketch of the channel should do just fine. We'll wing it from there. 🧐
It's always raining.
actually Vulcan has enough Fuel for the whole mission, they're refueling tea for the pilots
No wonder that when the drogue(?) snapped they got outta there as fast as they could. But they were kind enough to donate some of their own tea to the leftover tanker👍
Nonsense, no British unit ever goes into battle without 3 weeks of tea 🤣🤣
It’s said that British pilots can I crease their fuel consumption as much as 10 times when under pressure, much like an afterburner, so that 3 week supply was quickly drained.
@@trumpstinyhands maybe the RAF Typhoon is really the Typhoo
@@pauldilworth3297 😂😂😂😂 well played sir. I doff my cap
I never watched a video of little jets moving on a map so intensely as I did this one. Riveting description and one hell of an operation.
I was the Wireless Operator on Ascension Island during the raid. There were a few mess-ups with planes not using the correct callsigns as went into a new day (cryptography etc). Which led to the radio calls for air to air refuelling by the Vulcans to be ignored. I was sworn at by an incredibly angry Vulcan pilot when he landed, but I was backed up the RN operations director who tore the pilot off a strip for forgetting to update the callsigns. Like everything else in real life things don't go to plan. One thing stuck out in my mind was extremely excited senior RAF officer hugging the crew of the Vulcans as they came into the Operations room (portacabin). It was in hindsight extremely brave of Vulcan crews and very British in its let's give it a go attitude.
Thank you sir. The angry Vulcan pilot wouldn't have been John Reeve would it?
no solo fue un bombardeo que fracaso...creo que 3 mas FRACASARON , solo murieron 9 soldados Argentinos y la pista fue operable hasta el fin del conflicto , los Argentino con su creencia que los TOMMYS no reconquistarían las islas Malvinas ...no se prepararon adecuadamente...será la próxima y sin la dama de hierro y que el infierno la tenga bien a resguardo.
This was such a British operation. Totally under-equipped and relying on one good old boy to make it through. I picture them twirling their mustache and drinking tea on the Vulcan.
Polishing off a crumpet as they hit the ingress point
Tea indeed! Vulcans and Victors all had hot water facilities!
@@callumr1998 even my old 432 afv had boiling vessel so we could 'brew up' when we were on operations or exercise :)
@@yamabushi170 British kit wouldn't be proper without a brew ;)
@@callumr1998 Gotta love our allies the UK...taking care of business and looking good at the same time.
The fuel problem was twofold... (for Black Buck 1 only).
1/ All the aircraft flew in formation at the same altitude, which meant that the Vulcan was not flying at it's most fuel efficient altitude.
and..
2/ The Vulcan was kept constantly topped up which meant that it was flying at maximum weight for most of the way. ( More weight means that more fuel is required).
This was immediately realised and was corrected for the later Black Buck missions.
Having said that a good, accurate, and informative video clip!
.
I'm glad you enjoyed. Make sure you're subscribed for the next video!
Interesting point, well made. I forget which black buck mission it was, but the vulcans refuelling probe snapped completely! and had to divert to Rio de Janerio (I think).... with a live shrike missile that had failed to jettison. WHOOPS!!
@@justandy333 we are coming in armed!
Very good points. "Thats gonna be a regression for Mission Planning" lol. "You're gonna have to see this ride again."
Not only was it a bombing that failed...I think 3 more FAILED, only 9 Argentine soldiers died and the runway was operable until the end of the conflict, the Argentines with their belief that the TOMMYS would not reconquer the Malvinas Islands...I don't know They prepared properly...she will be next and without the iron lady and may hell keep her safe.
Imagine being stationed at that runway and the alarm for enemy planes wakes you up.
You get out your bunk, expecting a few harriers from the carrier to harass you, only to find a massive bomber has flown thousands of miles to wreck your day.
With the Argentine commanders worrying, “The Americans flew bombers off an aircraft carrier early in WWII. What have the British learned from that?”
I'd be unimpressed that a single 30 yo bomber is all they could manage.
And it managed to put a single bomb on the runway. Terrifying, just horrific.
@@elguapo1690 I can't imagine being so dense that I miss the message this raid sends.
you don't seem to appreciate the damage 1000lbs of explosives can do. The rest of the bombs landed on the troops and equipment stations at the airfield.
Truly one of the most ridiculous and suicidal missions I've ever heard that actually succeeded.
Ummmm.... Doolittle Raid
Aaron, it wasn't planned to be suicidal. It was however very risky. If you read Lt. Cmdr Sharkey Wards excellent book "Sea Harrier Over the Falklands", he is very critical of the RAF effort and, with some authority states that the Harriers could have done the job just as well and used literally millions of gallons of fuel less than the seven Black Buck missions consumed. However, the point he seemed to overlook was that because the RAF could bomb that far from home it did make the Argentinians withdraw fighters to protect the mainland, which may well have made a difference but of course we'll never know for sure. In that respect, it was a strategic move that helped to stack the odds as much in the British favour as possible, always a good thing in war.
@@theflyingfool It was in no way suicidal, it was just very risky, like all military missions. The refueling plan was the product of some egg-heads fevered imaginations though!....British pilots don't do suicide missions, they carry out orders.
@@cmbell73 Yeap that was pretty insane too. But based on technical complexity this mission takes the prize.
@@theflyingfool They didn't meant for it to be suicidal, but the level of complexity to pull it off nearly made it so. So many things could go wrong (and did) that nearly resulted in failure.
One of the best visual explanations I’ve ever seen of the raid , thanks
vqey2
Those Vulcan bombers were ancient even in 1982. Pretty sure one of them was fixed using parts from a bicycle.. no joke.
@@creativeamerican8811 they were officially retired and definitely overloaded.
They had no idea how much fuel they would use as it was totally outside anything it had ever done.
HobgoblinUK
Honestly it makes me shudder. Not a fan of flying but always say I reckon I’d be ok on a military aircraft outside of combat... just not a fan of commercial air travel, however, the thought of being in that Vulcan flying the length of the Atlantic.. I need someone to hold me... I’ve thought about it too much.
I was stationed at RAF Alconbury at the time of the war. Every morning, we'd receive classified briefings on what was happening. It was fun going home after shift, turning on the BBC, and seeing how wrong they got their stories.
The BBC getting their stories completely wrong doesn't sound likely at all, therefore I disbelieve this story..... 🤣
The BBC gave a news report on TV that Vulcans could reach the Fslklands just before they took off from Ascension.
It's a shame the BBC didn't think before letting slip that 2 Para were attacking Goose Green a few hours before they were due to. Whoever made that decision should've been shot.
@@hairydave82 when we had treason laws as well ...
@@wayneabel5421 Margaret Thatcher: "It's treason then." *pulls out lightsaber*
The logistical minutiae is so often overlooked but the importance of it's success is beautifully illustrated here.
not realy the air strip was repaired and operated til the last day o the conflict. the susecuent operations whit anti radiaton misisles have more impact.
@@anuvisraa5786 I'm talking about the success of the logistical side to complete the mission in this case. The impact of the raid itself was pretty minimal you're right but it did result in a withdrawal of the fast jets back to the Argentinian mainland so there was some benefit.
Besides, it was one massive muscle flex by the UK that certainly degraded Argentina's confidence in the war. I thinkt he political repercussions had much more impact than the physical ones.
@Real Thailand Once again for the intellectually impaired, I'm talking about the success of the logistical operation so the mission could be completed which was a remarkable achievement given the resources available. Learn to read.
@Real Thailand The aim was to get the bomber to the Falkland Islands so it could deliver its payload,and back in one piece. This was successfully achieved so clearly it was a logistical success. What are you not understanding here?
In operation Black Buck Six, one vulcan broke his fueling nose and was forced to land in Rio here in Brazil. You can find pictures of the pilots enjoying the night in the city together with the Brazilian pilots who intercepted them with F5s. Better than drifting in a inflatable boat at the Atlantic Ocean.
The emergency landing did cause some problems, as the Vulcan in question still had an American anti-radar Shrike missile on board. Officially the USA wasn't supporting the British and reports of British bombers armed with new, high-tech American weapons could've caused issues. I believe the Brazilians kept the whole thing quite in exchange for free spare parts for their British helicopters they had purchased earlier.
That was the story put out at the time.
The story around the RAF was that Britain had pre-positioned a Shape (Nuke) in the region.
In either case the Brazilian government refused to let the aircraft, and whatever it was carrying, leave until the MoD agreed to purchase the Tuccano aircraft. An awful aircraft that needed extensive modifications before the RAF could use it.
A cool fact, Britain decided to purchase every single Exocet missile on the market just to stop Argentina from purchasing them
@JuanOber 2018 just like argentina
yes, and at every opportunity shrink her navy to the point at which it is now a shadow of its former self..logic is not a strong point in the MOD
@Vlodec
Apart from the fact one ship can't be in two places, what we have are _vastly_ more capable than what we had back then.
If we sent our fleet back in time is likely that this entire mission could have been completed with ⅓ of the capital ships we took, just a single Type 45 can defend vast stretches of sea against ship, aircraft and missile attacks.
Combined with a carrier with CAP and crows nest capability, nothing gets near.
Still didn't help with Sheffield.
@@gbonkers666
But it did teach us a harsh lesson about CIWS.
So sometimes you have to take what you can from a bad situation.
If you look at ships _everybody_ build now, it's all about layered anti-air defense, CIWS, point defence missiles, fleet air defence and networked sensors and fire control.
Just a single Type 45 now provides all of that on it's own, more than a Type 42 and Type 22 combined.
The amazement and dedication of the RAF pilots didn't just stop here.
I was stationed on the Falklands shortly after the war to build the runway (as well as other tasks), which was still only big enough for a Hercules c130 to land, carrying military equipment and our letters from home.
Two Hercules would set off from ascension and the first Hercules would use half its fuel then refuel the second before turning back. However, the first Hercules still couldn't make it to the Falklands, so a Victor bomber would then refuel the Hercules for a second time.
The problem was, the Victors slowest speed was still faster than the Hercules fastest speed, so both planes had to climb to a set height then go into a dive as they refuelled (it's called 'tobogganing).
The pilots use to say that they felt as if the Hercules would shake apart, and they did that three times a week until the runway was built to be able to land bigger aircraft some months later.
I was a navigator on those C-130 tankers. To get the freighter CMk1 to Stanley took 2 refuellings. Initially we used a Victor for the first bracket and the KMk1 Herc for the second, and eventually 2 C-130 tankers. The mission to do the second bracket took 17 hours out and back. Once the Stanley runway had been extended and covered in AM2 we took the tanker Hercs down to the Islands to support the Harriers and F-4s, but there were no larger aircraft in the inventory back then. Eventually when Mount Pleasant was built in '87 the Tristars took over the Air Bridge and didn't need refuelling, but we didn't buy the Tristars until a few years afterthe war.
There's a certain Britishness to the whole.
"We don't have enough fuel."
"Let's turn back, then."
"No, we've got a runway to destroy."
And, that was the "B" team!.......We don't fuck about......
Lol, yeah but that badass attitude was completely fucked by the tanker crew who noped out on them at the last minute.
Its a standard "Do-or-die" attitude common in Europe at that time. Both western nations and the eastern block were standing on the shoulders of the giants their fathers who fought in WW2 were. And they approached any task given as it was the Battle of Britain/Siege of Leningrad itself as they learnt that that is how things are done ...
That attitude is of course far gone, bar few exceptions here and there.
The Vulcan that took part in this raid is on display at it’s original home base at RAF Waddington which is just down the road for me. Just shows how innovative the RAF are. This was widely considered an impossible task but they still carried it out. Makes me proud to be British and can’t wait to join the RAF
More of a 'Actually nah fuck it, we'll figure it out'
Having suffered a crippling recession in the 1970's Britain's military was in sad shape. It's amazing they were able to do this.
It's a cliche but can-do spirit did play a role here. The Vulcan crew was all-in regardless.
It’s in even worse shape now
It'll be entiry non-existent when Corbyn sells it all off to pay for his communist utopia...
On paper, I would have to say: they were not able to do this.
@@Zakalwe-01 Corbyn sucks but Argentina only invaded after Thatcher cut spending on defence.
Who ever dreamed up the deck-shuffling refuel was some kind of Rubic's Cube logistics genius. The last minute swap of fuel between tankers was also a grand exhibition of intelligence, perseverance, and adaptation under duress.
Flexibility is the key to air power, as they say. BTW I was in white 4.
Yeah it was the right solution, but I saw it exactly like a staged rocket. Once you run a stage out of fuel, discard it to drop the weight.
@@Hypersonik For anyone who's ever played Kerbal Space Program, this is very similar to asparagus staging.
@@SoWhat1221 Yeah, it can take a lot of planning to actually build something to work that way
@@MegaWeebles Were you with Paul Milligan? He'd been one of my QFIs 4 years earlier and I met him on ASI just before the raid.
That is the most British thing ever. An absurdly impractical and dangerous effort for a task way over their heads that, somehow, works.
The runway was repaired within hours, but was camouflaged to look busted during the day, and operational at night.
The last C-130 flew out of it in the early hours of June 14th.
The runway wasn't extended, reinforced, nor used for Mirages ever, which was very idiotic.
@@hugoarcada Found the argie lmao
@S D Are you an adult?
@S D Thatcher matched idiotic hubris with ridiculous and unrepentant aggression
I remember the mission but had no idea what a pain in the ass it was. The Falkland War was the first conflict that I watched unfold on television.
Hi I love the vulcan
If they knew how difficult it was maybe things would have been different.
@@dukedepommefrites8779 In hindsight cruise missiles would've been the best weapon to use on Port Stanley. 6 cruise missiles would've put the runway out of action for much longer, and without endangering friendlies.
@@killman369547 It seems like that could be tricky as cruise missiles use side-scanning terrain radar for their navigation. They'd have a lot of featureless sea to cross before fixing on the island, and then possibly not have enough maneuverability to turn inland to hit the runway (not sure of the scale from the video.) I can't remember the operation, but I've seen another video where cruise missiles had to take a circuitous route around a flat expanse of desert so they would have some mountains to follow to the target.
@@jimstanley_49 That was on another Operations Room video, "Air War in Desert Storm."
I saw an interview with that guy on a cable TV show... He's totally straight during the whole thing, but the things he's saying are unbelievable... It'd been ten years, since they had done a single flight, of mid air refueling... they dragged the equipment out of the back of old hangars were it was buried... then they ran practice flights every day, trying to re-learn how to do it.....
Then the flight back, the way he told the story, was unintentionally hilarious, and breathtaking... Very calmly, he says "Well, it'd been at least a decade, of training flights, and I literally never saw the fuel gauge below a half, at any moment... Now here we were, on fumes, wondering, does this gauge even work, when it's this low?? Is there any reserve built into this thing???" I remember just shaking my head and laughing at the TV screen, like, are you kidding??? omg. And then the rescue flight turns back due to low fuel... Unreal...
I just found your channel. You do a great job on these. These are very well done, and very good.
I remember watching a documentary about this and the scramble to rebuild the in-flight refueling system. Apparently they were missing a critical valve component and were trying to work out how fast they could fabricate a new one when one of the engineers found the part being used as an ashtray in the crew mess.....
When asked to do something your aircraft was not designed for. And when working with what you've got. The armed forces do seem to rise to the challenge.
I suppose operating as the RAF does, punching well above its weight and doing so with limited budgets. Working around problems is the norm.
thanks for explaining the refueling brackets as you did, having read Vulcan 607 i never understood how the refueling worked until now .. thanks again
No problem, glad you enjoyed
I will happily second that comment! Vulcan 607 is a great read but this visual displayed the operation perfectly. Thanks!
this is why when i went threw training in the British army my section comander always told us " this is the British army and its a small badly equipped army for a reason. it forces you to do alot more with alot less and hence makes you a superior warrior the war only stops when we run out of hot water coffee and tea"
nails
Also you keep the grunts less supplied so the grunts are always too angry to die.
Coffee and tea are priorities, everything else is secondary
No wonder they were running short on fuel, they forgot to account for the weight of the balls of steel of the pilots (all of them)... ;-)
Love this !
Bullshit! They should be ashamed to be a member of the RAF! They were incompetent and a bunch of hacks!
@@josephkane825 what a cock
Love it 😂🇬🇧
@@josephkane825 Poor fellow, you're not a gentleman, are you.
I was stationed in Vegas during the 70's and we hosted the Britts for a joint test force and they brought a fleet of Vulcans that we refueld in the air several times during the operation.
How did the Vulcans perform?
There is no aircraft that sounds quite as incredible as the Vulcan. I've been fortunate to see it fly a dozen or so times before being completely retired
Same here mate, first of all you get that quad bass rumble tearing your very molecules apart as it releases the brakes, then as it glides past, that distinctive blowing over the top of a bottle sound, howling as it screams skyward. Inspiring stuff.
I remember it's final RAF service year, when they really opened up the engines and threw it around like a fighter one last time. I thought it would be the last time I saw her. Until she was restored and flew much more conservative displays for a few years. Still, that sound. Never forgotten.
I would love to have experienced a whole squadron taking off.
@@poppedweasel I saw one growing up in the USAF, at an airshow. Looked awesome, sounded awesome.
@@poppedweasel that would be amazing on paper, but you'd probably be literally deaf now ;)
@@rowgliLikely be extinct too. If a whole squadron took off, there probably wouldn't be a UK for them to return to. Some things should remain wishes. ;)
@@rikk319 I saw one fly at an air show at Edwards AFB , California back in 1980. Awesome . I was in the USAF at the time.
British stiff upper lip: Chaps, We may not have any fuel but on the bright side it means we're lighter.
If Operation Black Buck 1 could be compared with any other mission, I'd put it in the same bracket as the Doolittle Raid on Tokyo in 1942. Both involved theoretically near-impossible expenditures of resources with the same high level of risk versus reward - the the case of the Doolittle Raid, the risk was of losing the USS Hornet, one of only three US fleet carriers in the Pacific at the time, which made it *almost* indispensable. However, the reward for the risk of the Doolittle Raid would be the inflicting of a massive shock on the Japanese high command - psychological rather than physical damage, since the boast in Imperial Japan at the time was that the home islands were inviolable. Having sixteen B25s turn up seemingly out of nowhere to drop bombs on a totally unprepared Japan was a massive humiliation for a race of people for whom pride and 'face' were integral. The damage to Japanese pride far outweighed the physical damage the bombers inflicted, and all of the bombers were lost after running out of fuel. In an attempt to put a brave face on the debacle, the Japanese propagandists tried to pass it off as the 'Do-Nothing Raid' but, in fact, they were shocked to the core.
Likewise, the Argentines tried to present Operation Black Buck 1 as a pinprick at the end of a massive expenditure of resources. They tried to point and laugh at the single bomb crater in Stanley's runway and suggest that, as all the other bombs missed the target, the raid was a failure. The book on the raid, 'Vulcan 607', makes clear the RAF's objective was 'runway cutting' - bisecting the runway and halving its length - rather than the wholesale destruction of the island's main lifeline. The objective all along was to place one bomb on the runway to damage it and Operation Black Buck 1 succeeded in doing just that - damaging the runway just enough to deny its use for fast jets. The Argentine engineers patched the crater within 24 hours, hence their belief the raid was an expensive failure. However, they botched the job. The first aircraft to touch down at Stanley after the raid - an Argentine C130 Hercules - ran over the filled-in crater on its landing roll and the crew discovered in doing so that the runway was no longer flat and level because the Hercules slewed off the runway and ended up on the grass. It was quickly realised that any attempt to land or take off with a Mirage or Skyhawk on such a surface would end catastrophically. Black Buck 1 had achieved its objective. Only after the war was over was the crater properly repaired.
There were actually two carriers on the Doolittle raid. Hornet and Enterprise which only reinforces what a had risk operation that mission was.
You've got wrong information, the crater wasn't patched, the opposite, the argentinians threw more mud over the crater to make it look bigger because they knew that the british were looking with satellites. The runway at Stanley was used by the argentinian aircrafts till the end of the war, with the last Hercules taking off in the middle of the night during the Tumbledown combat was going on, so the runway wasn´t destroyed. Plus, the argentinians gave up the idea of landing combat aircrafts in the runway BEFORE this bombing, in april. The effect was psychological. The fear of another Vulcan bombing was constant. And This was the only succesfull Black Buck mission, and it failed to actually destroy the runway...
@@sanignacio1999 My primary source for information on the raid was Rowland White's book, "Vulcan 607". He talked extensively to the RAF personnel who planned and executed Black Buck 1 and it was made clear that destroying the runway wasn't the objective - cutting it in half was the plan. They loaded the Vulcans with leftover WW2-vintage bombs and planned to drop them at an angle across the runway in the hopes of putting at least one of them onto it and rendering it inoperable for fast jets. They didn't know what Argentina's plans were for the runway at Stanley, only that it was the only runway in the vicinity that theoretically COULD accommodate Mirages and Skyhawks. So the plan was to shorten it by half and that's what they did.
@@elennapointer701 It was a success for the british, but did nothing against the argentines. Why they didn't even try to extend the runway before this bombing raid is puzzling. It was fully operational at night until the end if the war though.
Correct. The fact that all dog fights took place with fast jets coming from the mainland tells us what we need to know. Much further to travel and more fuel burned giving far less time to possibly dogfight and use your gas-guzzling afterburners, fewer sorties per day also as further to fly.
This was a brilliant presentation and demonstration of this epic mission.
I live up the road from RAF Waddington and see XM607 parked up by the A15.
My Dad, who sadly recently died, used to run the Royal Engineer Field Support unit in the 80's and 90's.
At one point the base got hold of the last Victor to refuel the Vulcan and my Dad's unit built a second platform so the two aircraft were situated next to each other as a memorial. But some pencil pushing spoil-sport in Whitehall said they weren't allowed two gate guards, so the Victor was towed off and dismantled.
Fortunately my Dad was able to salvage a couple of cockpit displays for me from the Victor, one of which I still have to this day
His unit shared a hanger with XH558 when they first arrived and I got to often sit in the Vulcan whenever I visited Dad at work.
Such a special aircraft
I know that it's just a map animation but boy that was intense
The Vulcan is my favorite non-USAF aircraft. Its kind of sad it couldn't me modernized like the B-52.
Vulcan is cooler than a B52, sorry not sorry :D
@@TheOperationsRoom and the Victor. Such a scary aircraft.
@@TheOperationsRoom Sorry dude. Can't side with you on that one. BUFF's rule!
@@sarge505050 I guess you yanks will make silly claims like the P51 is cooler than a Spitfire next ;)
@@TheOperationsRoom, aye, remember, it is an aircraft the RAF wanted and we delivered.
The planners of this mission obviously stayed awake during math class.
A remarkable feat
One tiny error and there'll be plenty of tankers landing on the sea.
In the early 1970s, I lived in Bellevue Nebraska...the then-home of SAC headquarters at Offutt AFB, and got to see lots of different aircraft at their annual air shows. One of the most amazing ones I ever saw was a Vulcan bomber. With their delta wing design, they could come over at such a low speed that they seemed to vibrate to keep from falling out of the air, then make a turn a few miles south of the field and come back over at close to 500 mph and everything in town would vibrate. :-D
The jet version of Rodan.
At the 1956 Farnborough Air Show the Vulcan Bomber did a roll on take off. It is on TH-cam.
Isn't this the mission where the guys scavenged parts for the bomber from museums and junkyards and even one part was an ashtray? Gotta give it to the British, they go for it and usually hit it for six as they say. Salutes from the United States Navy 🇺🇸💞🇬🇧
I think you're right about the ashtray.
It is said there was a conversation between the brits and the Americans who's airbase on ascension the mission was run from. The fuel was supplied through the Americans and when the brits gave them their requirements the American commander said " you can't possibly use that much fuel" the reply was "we're going to give it a bloody good try"
I can't be certain it is true but i hope it is.
And for what it is worth. The Americans did help out logistically with this mission so respect to you.
@lee van cleef these days nukes would be delivered by a cargo ship from China.
@lee van cleef please say this is a joke.
@@finkyfamboni4333 No it's not. Mark Felton has a video on it (can't find the file reference ATM)
>scavenged parts for the bomber from museums and junkyards
This still happens.
And the crew played Chariots of Fire on the way back home.
as they hugged and cried probably knowing that they wont be getting wet
And everyone stood up and clapped
After one of the Black Buck missions, the Vulcan XM597 was on its way back to Ascension when it had a problem in its aerial refueling system and was unable to refuel. RAF's contigency plan was for the planes to try an emergency landing in Brazil if such situations happened. So the crew kept radio silence and headed to Rio de Janeiro, where they would only contact the Brazilian authorities once they found the closest airport. However, they were spotted by the radars as soon as they entered Brazilian airspace, so the Brazilian Air Force sent two F-5 Tigers to intercept the bomber, the Vulcan's crew was forced to break radio silence and inform them about the fuel problem. Then the bomber was escorted to the Galeão International Airport, where it was grounded and its missile AGM-45 was apprehended. The Brazilian Government only allowed the XM597 to fly back to UK seven days later and under the condition that it wouldn't be used in further missions against Argentina during the war.
oh, and the vulcan had to do the flight back unarmed if i recall (including the condition you mentioned), right?
They played Chariot of Fire cassette in the Vulcan after the bomb run. Truly classic
That was the most labour and resource costly 1000lb bomb ever. Well done! Thanks for explaining the refueling sequence so well. I had no idea what it took. Too bad they didn't have two birds on target for that first run.
Well, 21 1000lbs bombs
@@Damo2690 I know. I was referring to the fact that only one bomb did any damage.
Did the fleet have the fuel to get two Vulcans over target?
@@Dave5843-d9m they did but one of the Vulcans had to turn back when the cabin wouldn't pressurize. I remember when I was a kid i went to an air show here in Winnipeg and the RAF showed up with one or their Vulcans. Blew my mind mind when it flew low altitude over the crowd. That wing. The size. The noise! I never forgot it. As I think about it i imagine they could never get that close to a crowd nowadays. My all-time favorite plane.
From the snags that occurred in the later stages of the outbound flight, particularly the electrical storm, & a snapped refuelling drogue it looks like the abort of the 2nd Vulcan was fortuitous to getting the single Vulcan onto target & safely returned.
It was remarkable that the Vulcan wasn't hit by an Argentine air defense battery concentrated on a single aircraft. Even more remarkable was the slide rule planning (without sophisticated computing aids in 1982) to achieve all the many buddy-buddy, & bomber refuelling contacts necessary to get the Vulcan to its target. A terrific achievement by the Victor Operations planners at HQ No 1 (Bomber) Group
There is a Vulcan at the castle air force base museum in Atwater California USA...despite its coming close to bein obsolete at the time of the raid you cant ignore its beauty..well done chaps.
@b52gf16c i have not heard of that. However the base was still in operation at that time. Far as the museum's existence im not sure. Will look into that. Very interesting. Cheers
@b52gf16c awesome information. I will have to visit for the 30th time...true actually
😀
@b52gf16c yes it is..i was there 6 months ago with my grandson. It never gets boring there. I posted a few vids of my visit on my channel if you care to check them out. Thank you for the information.
I remember reading in the local paper, during the conflict, about the removal of the part from the Castle museum Vulcan. Don't remember seeing it in the national news.
“We’re off then...” That’s the kind of thing heroes say when it looks like loss is on the horizon but they have a different vision.
Almost like... “Let’s roll”
I remember a sign up against the Exocet missile on display at the manufacturer's stand at the Farnborough Air Show after the Falklands War had ended.
It read:
"Combat Proven"
Black buck missions were actually several,this was just the 1st,the succeeding ones were anti radar. They just ddn't recieve the same publicity even after the war.
@Hammer 001 Taking fast jets off the islands is effective. Taking out following radar stations, then a foll up bombing strike on the Argentine garrison was entirely effective. British servicemen didn't die from potential action from those assets, its a complete success of tax payers money.
@@1993Crag Only one radar station was eliminated in the succeeding Black Buck raids. Two Black Buck raids were scrubbed, Black Bucks Two and Seven did not hit their targets (the bombs on Seven had not been fused correctly anyway); Five only did minor damage to their long-range radar and Six failed to acquire it and so only destroyed a single fire-control radar. Furthermore, Six was diverted to Brazil due to a refueling failure and nearly caused a political incident involving an American missile still aboard the plane.
Black Buck One was successful, as it achieved its objective, but I would argue the subsequent Black Bucks were not worthwhile given the Herculean effort to use bombers on the edge of retirement in a mission the RAF never planned for, and only existed to give the RAF an opportunity to participate in the conflict and to improve morale.
I've never been so hooked on a story of little plane icons and a low res map.
I remember a Vulcan flying up NE Valley, Dunedin, NZ... Not sure when, but probably the 70s. Absolutely no doubt due to it's shape. In camouflage colours, it looked like a giant moth.
These were incredible examples of professionalism and bravery. Not enough can be said about the maintainers restoring systems. One part of a refueling system was found being used as an ashtray in a ready room!
In September 1981, Argentina actually applied to the UK Government to buy an unspecified number of Vulcans. The export of a single aircraft was approved, but intra-government correspondence at the time noted its potential suitability for bombing the Falklands. Three months later, Argentina invaded the Falklands and the sale was off.
Interesting, do you have a a source?
I once attended a talk at an airshow hosted by one of the crewmembers of XM607, sadly I couldn't remember who it was, but it wasn't Martin Withers. Really good talk and I learnt so much. His talk was definitely the highlight of that Air show as sadly it was in poor conditions and 90% of the flying plan was cancelled due to extremely poor weather. His talk was brilliant though and totally worth it.
The noise of Vulcan XX558 on maximum thrust pulling up from low level after completing its bombing run to turn about and head home must have been truly awesome.. Proud to be British.
XX558 wasn't a Vulcan. Presumably you mean XH558? Which didn't take part in the mission at all.
I believe this was the entire British Ariel Refuelling fleet. This was also one of the greatest bombing runs in history.
only thing about britain.
It knows how to hit a target somehow.
They’re not refilling washing detergent mate
one of the funniest fact's I learnt was that a mechanical part essential for the mission was sitting in the staff room been used as an ash tray ha ha ha good ol Britz!
Hey yeah was another doco on the raid here on TH-cam. Apparently it was an essential part that was required to carry out air refuelling
TRISTAN DICKINSON There’s a whole documentary on the Black Buck raids on TH-cam. It was being used as an ash tray in the RAF Waddington officer’s mess
You can actually see XM607, it’s positioned near the entrance to RAF Waddington on the A15 into Lincoln.
The RAF didn't have a whole lot at their disposal, but just like they've always done- they found a way to go above and beyond their known capabilities. Incredible story. Thank you for sharing.
My uncle was the Air Electronics Officer on the Primary Crew for this mission, ironically his crew had flown out on XM607 but switched aircraft as they had problems with the fuel tank. He got to in on the second raid.
This is simply amazing. I never realised just how complex it was.
They found part of the vulcan refueler probe in a officers mess, which was used as a astray.
Just before the Vulcan came near the Falklands a jump jet flew near Stanley to make sure the argies had the radar on as they expected an attack. But not the Vulcan attack. This enabled the Vulcan to lock on to the signal given off by the enemy radar.
Can warmly recommend The Fighterpilot podcast which has a recent interview with the Vulcan pilot that did the mission
I live within 2 miles of xm607 vulcan sat next to the runway of raf waddington amazing to see evertime I go past 👍
s g It's in a very sad state.
@@GSP21 but it is still at least in a state, rather than the metal reclaimed.
@@EngineeringAndRestoration You mean like maybe EVERY RN BATTLESHIP!?!
s g
I remember it well, having served with Bomber Command and stationed at RAF Waddington and RAF Cottesmore in the 1960s, still seems like it was a short time ago, but decades have passed by so quickly.
RAF Waddington has an interesting history should you wish to examine it.
To modern military minds, this seems like such an improvised, 'poor man's strike' while World War II Lancaster bomber crews would be amazed by the capabilities of the planes involved in this raid.
If they were not aware - they would be equally in awe of when Vulcan first flew. The gap between Lancaster and Vulcan is brainbendingly short.
@@AdmV0rl0n The Avro Shackleton was retired from service in 1991.
It was the descendant of the Avro Lancaster.
Air Chief Marshal Sir Michael Beetham planned this raid and he was a WW2 Lancaster veteran
The Avro Vulcan is the RODAN of strategic bombers.
A truly amazing mission. I did not know it involved so many refueling stages and tankers, refueling tankers. And great courage and skill by all involved.
The failure rate was so high. What a fantastic video. Never knew about the refueling plan. Fantastic.
I was in Lincolnshire at the time and remember Vulcans changing their flying routine.
For a while a singleton would leave Waddington and later run back up along the edge, making a low pass across the station with an explosion to mark it's passing.
It was clear that someone was soon going to be served notice that they were not out of reach.
In due course a heavily laden departure was heard and then seen climbing out on an unusual southerly heading.
On TV the band of the Paratroop Regiment had played "Don't Cry for Me Argentina" as they marched down to the docks.
That band made a brilliant choice of music.
I was in Olinda Brazil and saw two Vulcans roaring over that day. For a 11 year old boy and fanatic for war jets it was quite a scene. Thanks for posting this video.
Nice graphic! Short, sweet and to the point.
There is a 47-minute video called XM607 Falklands' Most Daring Raid that covers the story in more detail, and with personal anecdotes, but for a "CliffsNotes" version, this is good!
Lost count of how many times i've watched this!
Given the number of equipment failures and mishaps on the mission, this all falls under the category of “miraculous.”
Fantastic video, those animations were very helpful to track the complicated refueling procedure.
Fantastic. I remember the raid but those guys got way too little credit for what they did.
@Hammer 001 There were no harriers there at the time. Had that airfield not been compromised as it was, Argentina could have based Super Etendards there and history is altered. Anyway my comment was about the personnel.
@Hammer 001 That would be extremely fortuitous - having the task there the day the Argentine invaded. Perhaps keep your personal remarks to your friends and family.
@Hammer 001 Sir, the first attacks by Sea Harrier FRS.1 aircraft, of 800 Naval Air Squadron, took place AFTER the Black Buck One bombing raid. David Morgan, one of the Sea Harrier pilots, suffered a damaged tail plane due to cannon fire.
@Hammer 001 we agree with your statements totally. Knowing a lot of the RN Sea Harrier pilots as we do, if anything the Black Buck raids hindered the offensive effort.
I mean, it was more of a propaganda mission than a strategic one. Like the Doolittle raid, it was more meant to show off the capabilities of the RAF than to actually deliver a strategically-significant payload.
I remember we loaded the 1,000lb bombs on a train at the ROF depot - they were placed on the floor of the wagon because there was no time to crate them up. The train started off and I could hear the bombs clanging like bells. We had to stop the train and we fitted wedges between them the bombs. Glad to know they arrived at there final destination!
If you look at recent aerial photos of the airport there are a row of craters filled with water on the south west side of the runway.
Damn! Just checked out Google maps! Amazing...
Yes before we retook it, the Argies were using them as baths lolol
Back end of the stick dropped on this raid. First Bomb hit the southern side of the runway.
SUPERBLY EXPLAINED/ puts the whole op into clear and precise context. well done. i only made it to ascension, and saw them off....brave job.
When you are waiting for the *DITCH DITCH DITCH!* from the pilot but you see the fuel going up. _Happy tea noises_
'This mission seems to be impossible.'
'Well, let's do it anyway.' The book Vulcan 607 is well worth a read.
FAntastic animation, and a couple of details I didn't know about.... how we achieved this is quite astounding, given the complexities and odds stacked against. But we did pull it off.... sadly, those days of bravery are gone, and I have no idea what this country is coming to.... thank you for a splendid account... I loved the background music, in great taste, and it did not distract from the narration.... give you 10 / 10
For me it's always this raid and HMS Venture's sinking of U-846 that show what people can do with some graph paper and pencil!
Moon landing doesn't count?
As a CS student, I've always loved the Alan Turing story and the breaking of Enigma. A war won with cogs and wires
@@sypwn If you go to Ascension Island you could see that the could have shot the moon landing there.
Thx
My friend died in the Falklands. He'd have loved this.
However he'd have been disappointed; with some of the ignorant disrespectful comments here!
I've got nothing against the British over the falklands war. The only thing that makes me scratch my head is why not just use cruise missiles to hit port stanley instead of risking a bomber and crew? This seems like an awful lot of work for one bomb hit.
@@killman369547 it’s 39 years ago....
Have a look back at what was in the arsenal and what was available to the planners at the time......
That was by far the best description of Black Buck One I've ever heard!!! Liked and subbed instantly!!!! Well Done Mate!!!!
Odd that only 39 years later this entire mission could be accomplished, unseen, by a single submarine.
i mean it could probably be done back then aswell but i dont know if Britain had any missile subs
As you rightly say, I think that was a demonstration to Argentina that we could reach them if necessary. The RAF’s day’s or should I say nights of wrecking enemy cities was over but they still must have had a formidable reputation.
Imagine the sheer relief that Vulcan crew must’ve felt when they saw the tanker with mere minutes to spare on their fuel.
Like damn.
And to think, most B2 missions take off from the states, fly across the world, drop bombs, and then go back home.
Do you really think it's reasonable to compare an aircraft that first entered operational service in 1997, 15 years after this mission took place, with an aircraft that had been operational since 1956? Come on mate, be fair.
Besides, B2's could only manage a range of 6,800 miles, that would have been 1,000 short for this epic mission.
I still cant believe that there isn't a movie about this
Refuelling midair, looks damn hard on a good day. This whole operation just blows my mind. The animation is much appreciated.
And the RAF learned their lesson and maintain a fleet of long range bombers to this day.
@@bobsemple7660
Sorry mate, was being sarcastic. They currently don't have anything even close to the old Vulcan's capabilities let alone a better long range platform that could effectively support far flung territories.
@@bobsemple7660 No the MOD realised that long range strategic bombers are useless so long as you always have your aircraft carriers.. oh wait.
@@Tomartyr We now have two air craft carriers, we never had proper air craft carrier as we sold the design for them to the yanks and promised that we would never build a full size carrier again. Which is why the QE and PC are smaller than the nimitz class. However, war has changed since then and you have drones and long range missiles. All what you need to do nowadays is press a button and you can win half the way straight away.
RAF should have bought 100 B-1B. USAF should have bought 500 B-1B and 100 B-2.
@@stupidburp The RAF probably couldn't even afford the paint for a B1-B, to be honest.
You have NO IDEA how long this distance is. If you're an American, it's like flying from NYC to Los Angeles, back to NYC and back to Denver in the middle of the night, over open ocean.
And I thought my career washing dishes on an aircraft carrier was dangerous 😆🇺🇸💞🇬🇧
Operation "Keep calm and CRIKEY THERE'S NOT ENOUGH PETROL IN THE TANKER"
OH BUGGER
Isn't that Ozzie?
Absolutely outstanding effort by the RAF to inflict the first blow in recapturing the Falkland Island and extremely well presented video. 👍
Excellent video, straight to the point and very detailed and informative. I'll spread the word around and disable my adblocker for you. Thank you for your time and effort.
I'm not even from Britain but this made me feel powerful
It made me feel weak. One bomber needing that many tankers. Bruhhhhh
@@yungy7942 come on, we were fighting a war half a world away, against a country with a massive home advantage and larger military numbers and we still won. Pretty impressive, dont you think?
@@yungy7942 Americans lost to a bunch of trees
@@yungy7942 Did you not listen to what was said at that start of the video? It was the longest bombing run at that time, covering a total distance of around 7,800 miles. The B-52 only manages 8,800 at the moment, and that's only in the last 30 years due to the numerous refits and upgrades that it's undergone over the years. At the time of this operation it's limit was around 6,500 miles.
@@calebdouglas2512 "larger military numbers"
*laughs in A-4 skyhackw using bombs from the WW2*
That's just wayyyyyy too far away from home to be fighting a war, for the UK. Incredible they pulled it off.
Was @ Army ROTC Advanced Camp @ Ft. Riley, KS when the Falklands War happened. Not having any portable devices, we all cheered when we were told the Argentines surrendered.
Absolutely outstanding show of British Grit, Determination and ingenuity.
A we;l-told story of impressive logistics, resourcefulness, and bravery. Your videos are superb and respectful to the stories they tell. Kudos.
Thank you very much!
That was fantastic! I live only 3 miles from RAF Waddington and see XM607 often.
She's in quite bad condition these days :(
Looking at this video (and similar ones), one can appreciate why the USAF still employs huge numbers of KC-135's and KC-10's.
That's because they are easily modifiable. Old systems can easily be swapped for new systems with little down time. It's the same reason the B-52 is still in service as well and might become the first plane to stay in active service for 100 years.
I was a little surprised that both countries were so willing to fight over an island filled with rocks, penguins, and sheep.
Don't forget the Bennies
the was more to it like domestic political servile
I'm sorry but I wholeheartedly disagree. There were hundreds of civilians on that island that lived there. Do you just leave those civilians to be annexed by a foreign power?
Thanks for the visual. All the pilots must have been shaking their heads the whole time!
Thank you for such an excellent video. I've seen this story told a number of times but to actually see the graphic representations of all the aeroplanes involved in that mission is truly amazing, it's such an eye-opener regarding the distances and logistics. I am incredibly fortunate to have seen the XH558 at RIAT a few years ago and I think there's something rather awesome about four engined Avro's, such as the Vulcan or the Lancaster.
As a slight side note, I was recently flying from Dublin to London and discovered the aeroplane I was on was a BAE146, AKA Avro RJ45, and I mused to myself it was nice that Avro were still flying four engined aeroplanes over the skies of Europe! ;-)
This raid always makes me proud to be ex RAF. Although I was 12 at the time of the war, but 8 years later I finally done my impossible mission and signed up. However, I think that this was the only time in recorded history since WW2, that officers actually deserved to be respected. I have met several ex forces that served during the Falklands both marines and paras. All of whom never talk about it, they talk with their eyes and by that their eyes are in tears. When you see grown men with tears in their eyes and not able to speak, you can pretty much tell that the Falklands was one hell of an experience for those involved. Per Aruda Ad Astra always.
I was serving in RAFG at the time. Whilst Recruit Training SWINDERBY, we use to see Vulcans from SCAMPTON and WADDINGTON, overhead being air tested, that was something to see, them being put through their paces. I became an RAFP dog handler and spent many a cold wet night sheltering under a Vulcan. A bomber with the grace of a fighter, never be another aircraft like her.