This is the SUPER-Takumar 50mm f/1.4. Chapter 26.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
  • Isn't enough reviews about the performance of this Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 on TH-cam? The answer is "YES". But why I'm still doing it in 2023? Because I'm thinking out of the box.
    In this chapter, I'm concerned about its evolution and how to spot which generation it belongs to, with easy and no doubts, and why 8 elements went to the end of production.
    TH-cam 上關於這款 Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 的性能的評論還不夠嗎?答案是“是”。
    但為什麼我在 2023 年仍然這樣做?因為我是從另外一方面來思考。
    在本章中,我關心的是它的演變以及如何輕鬆且毫無疑問地發現它屬於哪一代,以及為什麼 8 個元素會停產。
    #carl #contax #kmz #meyer #pentax

ความคิดเห็น • 41

  • @seoulrydr
    @seoulrydr ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i refuse to go find a the special version of the 50mm! i'm lying. now i want one. i appreciate the detailed information contained in this video - thank you!

  • @ohjajohh
    @ohjajohh ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the background information about Pentax! I love Pentax lenses

    • @red_code
      @red_code  ปีที่แล้ว

      During my research for the Asahi's History Timeline (Pentax) I found "the master stone" from them, a relic, rare to find over the net. Their "Jupiter binoculars"! One more piece to my collection.

  • @stephenreynolds6414
    @stephenreynolds6414 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have the third generation of this lens and it is wonderful. The images that are produced are beautiful.

    • @red_code
      @red_code  ปีที่แล้ว

      Your comment rocks! Yes, we are speaking in "generations" and not based in serial numbers. Love your glass, no matter 8 or 7 elements.

    • @stephenreynolds6414
      @stephenreynolds6414 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@red_code I have seen a couple of reviews on You tube comparing the 8 v 7 element versions and there wasn't any noticeable difference. All Takumars are great.

  • @d30gaijin
    @d30gaijin ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting video. That you! My copy of the SMC Takuma 50/1.4 seems to be an anomaly. It's serial number (4620xxx) puts it in the last generation but the inscription on the back of the "manual/Auto" change switch is inscribed 37902 rather than 37802.

    • @red_code
      @red_code  ปีที่แล้ว

      Your copy is a Super-Multi-Coated Takumar. Their evolution - Takumar; Auto-Takumar; Super-Takumar; Super-Multi-Coated Takumar and last SMC Takumar. The product #37902 belongs to Super-Multi-Coated Takumar and the lens is coated with thorium too. Your copy were assembled after, or within the previous models Super-Takumar 1:4 / 50mm (37801 and 37802). Thank you for your comment.

  • @krustysurfer
    @krustysurfer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great knowledge bomb 🙌 thank you and great video

    • @red_code
      @red_code  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you.😊

  • @mikepxg6406
    @mikepxg6406 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video thank you.

    • @red_code
      @red_code  ปีที่แล้ว

      You welcome.

  • @simonc4764
    @simonc4764 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm aware there are actually two versions of the early 8 element lens. The early version produce softer image but the later version has thorium and is sharp just like the 7 element lens.

    • @red_code
      @red_code  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow, if you found something, just let me know and thanks for your comment.

  • @harrison00xXx
    @harrison00xXx ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome lens, doesnt matter if its a 2nd gen or latest 1969+ one
    I have the SMC Takumar with rubber focus ring and SN 5655555.
    I didnt mind the generation too much as long its not the earliest one with 8 elements. My main focus was on a good price and condition of the lens since its mainly used for low light and fun stuff here and then only

    • @red_code
      @red_code  ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow, lucky you with that SN.😀

  • @slammermx
    @slammermx 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a K3 ii and just bought the SMC 100 mm F/4, I'm loving it.

    • @red_code
      @red_code  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Love your lens.

  • @Rick_B52
    @Rick_B52 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I REALLY appreciate the attention to all the versions and serial number identification. Been trying to figure out which I have for a while. SN# 3.7mill so 68-69' most likely.

    • @red_code
      @red_code  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi, can you provide some more info about your lens, and I would try to figure it out.

  • @genleague7663
    @genleague7663 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for your great video. I really love to own this legendary lens but i have a bit concern whether this radioactive lens will impact the mirrorless camera sensor over the period of time? Does this matter need to be worried? 👍

    • @red_code
      @red_code  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As easy as a piece of cake. I have several radioactive lenses, specially the Carl Zeiss Pancolar (Zebra) 50mm f/1.8 (the strongest one). Unmount it from your camera body and if you don't feel safe, put it inside of a tin and close it. Only it's unsafe if you grind the glass dust and have direct contact with your body. Thanks for your comment.

  • @Andy-rk9mu
    @Andy-rk9mu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the great and information filled video. I was a bit confused about the R explanation: 2:20. There are many gen1 for sale with just a line on the right but could not come across one with R. Was it like a limited edition?

    • @red_code
      @red_code  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hello to you and thanks for the comment. When you see the red line on the right-hand side of mark 4, this one is the 8 elements or, the first generation doesn't have any inscription behind the iris control. Little red "R" is legacy, not every lens has it.
      It was taken out of the market because of the problem explained in this video. Japanese people care a lot about their consumers. For them, the main point is, that the lens should be used with other Spotmatics free from problems, but this was problematic.

    • @Andy-rk9mu
      @Andy-rk9mu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@red_codeThank you for the explanation. I see it now. I just ordered one, but I went after the radioactive.

    • @red_code
      @red_code  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Andy-rk9mu 😊👍

  • @NeoPlatina2009
    @NeoPlatina2009 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have the serial number 998219 of this lens. Very close to the 998383 you own :)

    • @red_code
      @red_code  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😍

  • @TheFuse25
    @TheFuse25 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome video, than you for your research and hard work! I have a question regarding the compatibility of the 8-element takumar: will the mirror mechanism of the Spotmatic SP damage the rear element of the glas? Thank you!

    • @red_code
      @red_code  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hello and thank you for your comment. If you own an 8-element version, you must pay close attention to the "R" at the film rewinder knob. If your Spotmatic SP holds a GREEN "R" it is UNSUITABLE, the push-plate will damage the rear element. If in RED, that's OK. Have a look at the 01:03:32:12. Thank you again.

    • @TheFuse25
      @TheFuse25 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@red_codethank you very much! Have a great day!

  • @jean-francoisgrasset744
    @jean-francoisgrasset744 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for all these very useful information. If I buy the 1st generation, can I use the lens with a LX or MX (with an adaptor), with no risk to damage the lens ?

    • @red_code
      @red_code  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello and thank you for your comment. I fear of that. Even the LX were introduced in 80s to commemorate the Asahi Optical, if I stood in the position of Pentax, I will think “that lens was removed from the market long time ago , and for the sake of a tree will not abandon a forest.” Use with extreme caution. Try to fire once in slow shutter and in a silent room. If it hits, sound and impact will be noticed.

    • @red_code
      @red_code  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If your adaptor is thicker then 0.5cm, I think it would do.

  • @jean-marcschwartz2525
    @jean-marcschwartz2525 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are these radioactive lenses dangerous for our eyes our health in the time?

    • @red_code
      @red_code  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I keep those radioactive lenses inside a tin and away from me, as a precaution. Many articles I have read are, only harmful when you accidentally hurt yourself with glass shards. Don't fear it too much because you are not sleeping with it or always carrying it with your camera. But the devil of that "brown yellowish tint color" is unsustainable. Thank you for the comment.

  • @_Drab
    @_Drab 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello.
    I have prod. 37908 SMC Takumar ser. 7654183
    What you can say about this lens ?

    • @red_code
      @red_code  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello. Your 50mm f/1.4 lens serial numbers range from 5346xxx - 7932xxx and are produced in 72 to 75. It's larger and heavier than before generation and it's 8 blades. At f/2, did you get round bokeh? Thank you for the comment.

    • @_Drab
      @_Drab 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@red_code thank you. Yes

    • @_Drab
      @_Drab 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@red_code and I have 6,5 mZv gamma radiation (>30x) on back lens

    • @red_code
      @red_code  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@_Drab interesting lens.