You have played a decent sample now (200k+ hands of rush and cash). What has your win rate been so far? There’s no more reason to hide it under some “low sample” excuse.
he has nothing to prove to you. hush. he's solid, and his ability to explain through his thoughts in order to coach us is incredible. if you need to know his win rate in order to believe his knowledge, go learn from hustler casino instead
@@asurp7173 I didn’t want my comment to encourage responses from haters/trolls like you. It is clear that Pete is good at poker and understand it better than almost all his viewers. No doubt about it. My question about his win rate comes from a place of wanting to know what is achievable in today’s online environment mostly
21:05 It looks bluffy and might get some calls. You could easily have a flush, two pair or better, so he is repping flushes, most likely with missed flush draw K of hearts. My best guess is he has T8 or KT with K hearts and bluffed you off with blocker to straight and nut flush.
I think that the river spot at 24:46 is really interesting and can be arguments for all the options we have (xf, xc, and xjam). I'd have bluffcatched double blocking the nut straight, even thou vs that size is close to indifferent! But, you should know better than me that low boards are often overbluffed especially in 3bp. Finally, you unblock the entire brodway region that can float the flop with overcards and backdoor equity even vs a mid/big size (common mistake of most regs is to overcall flops vs big sizes in 3bp) and bluff the river with no sdv after turn goes X/X. I think we also have arguments to check jam that combo. I understand that to regs look often difficult that other regs are able to properly protect their checking range ott and otr, but you can sometime play your T's, 8's and 76's just like that and balance your range with hands like 66's, 65's (as you don't need too many bluffs!). Def a close spot and all options could be fine!
Question: The hand that starts at 29:10 where you have JTo, wouldn’t this be a mandatory bluff on the river or are you saying that in a splash pot, too many people are calling with bad hands?
14:02 so bad check vs rec. bet fold like 10-25% on the flop and same on the blank turn. Check back river abd you can get exactly value from hands line this. Checking and playing quotation games if fish decide to bet is terrible
Hi Pete. Just wondering with the AJo SB v BU (3bp). The choice to go b33 on turn could you elaborate at all because all the hands you named that you can fold out, you are ahead of anyway. I understand denying them equity and preventing him from bluffing are incentives however to me your hand makes a decent giveup on the assumptions that IP may try to realise with these hands and then potentially XB river anyway. Plus im not sure if pool is defending the cbet with enough 88-99 region to fold out on turn anyway. The hands you probably do fold out the most are like QX (which sadly you block), but to me that makes the spot Jam/Check from OOPs perspective. I think I like a b33 at 100bbs a bit more because he is gonna call twice with Qx and then you can triple off at a decent rate (albeit probably not with this hand)
Nice video! How is that J8 close though? Has to be a pure VPIP with 10BB extra in there being OTB? Especially in reality if blinds are not jamming and ISOing aggressively which I’d imagine is the case at nl100. Gl with BR challenge at GG. Will you update on it here? Would be interested to see how it goes. I found that GG is the site I’ve made the lowest net BB/100 on. It’s not a huge sample but still well in to 6 figured number of hands. It’s surprising because my initial approximation was way different given the player pool, rake structure and RB system (yes, I’m aware RB is scammy on GG).
I think QTo at 8min against fish you could raise sized turn, some fish are capable of hero folding Kx but would not fold to raise + bet river. They also have QJ,JT that could pay once
I thought the same, even thou we can argue that sometimes a NAI raise OTT with a decently low SPR looks stronger than a raise jam (especially on a draw heavy board like that). In the end, I think it mostly depends on the rec profile (more passive, more spewy, maniac, etc...) and both plays have reason to be there.
I laughed too hard at the J8 pun 🤦 Its nice to see some hands where things dont work out so well, still great to hear the insights. Great vid as always
@@88jouman well I guess the idea was to give the idea that the spots are where the people are playing wrong and to understand the idea so it was fine for me. About the prove I believe that they made mass data analysis
I must be improving because I watched the 76 hand and thought "surely that's a mandatory bluff". When you x/r flop on an ace-high board in a 3bet pot, surely its either got to be a set for value or a flush/two straightening cards as a bluff. Calling the 3bet from the cutoff generally means you have all the mid-suited connectors and middling pocket pairs that villain doesn't as often. When the turn brings the flush and the suited ace is on the board, you know they have so few flushes. Then, when the river brings so many straights, I think people at micro/low stakes fold almost everything if you triple. That said...they probably don't fold a set of aces, so in that particular spot...I'd have lost a buy-in 😂
You have played a decent sample now (200k+ hands of rush and cash). What has your win rate been so far? There’s no more reason to hide it under some “low sample” excuse.
he has nothing to prove to you. hush. he's solid, and his ability to explain through his thoughts in order to coach us is incredible. if you need to know his win rate in order to believe his knowledge, go learn from hustler casino instead
Probably -5bb😂
@@asurp7173 I didn’t want my comment to encourage responses from haters/trolls like you.
It is clear that Pete is good at poker and understand it better than almost all his viewers. No doubt about it.
My question about his win rate comes from a place of wanting to know what is achievable in today’s online environment mostly
"Decent Sample". "Hundreds of Hands". 🤣
@@angrybeaver2204 edited lol
Nice high level explain again. What is your bb/100 until now in this pool??
21:05 It looks bluffy and might get some calls. You could easily have a flush, two pair or better, so he is repping flushes, most likely with missed flush draw K of hearts. My best guess is he has T8 or KT with K hearts and bluffed you off with blocker to straight and nut flush.
I think that the river spot at 24:46 is really interesting and can be arguments for all the options we have (xf, xc, and xjam).
I'd have bluffcatched double blocking the nut straight, even thou vs that size is close to indifferent! But, you should know better than me that low boards are often overbluffed especially in 3bp. Finally, you unblock the entire brodway region that can float the flop with overcards and backdoor equity even vs a mid/big size (common mistake of most regs is to overcall flops vs big sizes in 3bp) and bluff the river with no sdv after turn goes X/X.
I think we also have arguments to check jam that combo. I understand that to regs look often difficult that other regs are able to properly protect their checking range ott and otr, but you can sometime play your T's, 8's and 76's just like that and balance your range with hands like 66's, 65's (as you don't need too many bluffs!).
Def a close spot and all options could be fine!
oy youre playing too weak passive mate innit
Hi, what do u mean by low stakes when talking about Grade E? Thanks for response
Question: The hand that starts at 29:10 where you have JTo, wouldn’t this be a mandatory bluff on the river or are you saying that in a splash pot, too many people are calling with bad hands?
Hey Pete. Great video as always, can't wait for the new course to be released!
Completely off topic: any recommendations to learn bridge lnline?
Does betting one's range help against microstakes players at 0.01/0.02 & 0.02/0.05 if they're not aware of who has the range advantage?
14:02 so bad check vs rec. bet fold like 10-25% on the flop and same on the blank turn. Check back river abd you can get exactly value from hands line this. Checking and playing quotation games if fish decide to bet is terrible
if people actually listened to the first 3 minutes of this video, there would be no money in poker. class content as usual mate!
Just my everyday session for the last months...
As some experienced person said: - All you need is just to loose less than winning
Hi Pete. Just wondering with the AJo SB v BU (3bp). The choice to go b33 on turn could you elaborate at all because all the hands you named that you can fold out, you are ahead of anyway. I understand denying them equity and preventing him from bluffing are incentives however to me your hand makes a decent giveup on the assumptions that IP may try to realise with these hands and then potentially XB river anyway. Plus im not sure if pool is defending the cbet with enough 88-99 region to fold out on turn anyway. The hands you probably do fold out the most are like QX (which sadly you block), but to me that makes the spot Jam/Check from OOPs perspective.
I think I like a b33 at 100bbs a bit more because he is gonna call twice with Qx and then you can triple off at a decent rate (albeit probably not with this hand)
Nice video!
How is that J8 close though? Has to be a pure VPIP with 10BB extra in there being OTB? Especially in reality if blinds are not jamming and ISOing aggressively which I’d imagine is the case at nl100.
Gl with BR challenge at GG. Will you update on it here? Would be interested to see how it goes. I found that GG is the site I’ve made the lowest net BB/100 on. It’s not a huge sample but still well in to 6 figured number of hands. It’s surprising because my initial approximation was way different given the player pool, rake structure and RB system (yes, I’m aware RB is scammy on GG).
I think QTo at 8min against fish you could raise sized turn, some fish are capable of hero folding Kx but would not fold to raise + bet river.
They also have QJ,JT that could pay once
Seems good to me
I thought the same, even thou we can argue that sometimes a NAI raise OTT with a decently low SPR looks stronger than a raise jam (especially on a draw heavy board like that). In the end, I think it mostly depends on the rec profile (more passive, more spewy, maniac, etc...) and both plays have reason to be there.
I laughed too hard at the J8 pun 🤦 Its nice to see some hands where things dont work out so well, still great to hear the insights. Great vid as always
Should have bet the river
Where is the dark? It looks like any of my poker sessions. I thought this is normal...
Great work Pete! Just like Anakin Skywalker bringing balance between the light and dark side of poker
Love the format as always and great news that Grade E is coming to the store.
Dude them small 3bets like at 10:30 just kill me when I miss the flop
Hi as i Understand grade e sounds exploitive, so whats the difference between it and cash injection?
Grade E is more in depth.
Yeah i think cash injection was priced way too high without mass data proving stuff and longer and more in depth examples
@@88jouman cash injection was extremely cheap
@@88jouman well I guess the idea was to give the idea that the spots are where the people are playing wrong and to understand the idea so it was fine for me. About the prove I believe that they made mass data analysis
I must be improving because I watched the 76 hand and thought "surely that's a mandatory bluff".
When you x/r flop on an ace-high board in a 3bet pot, surely its either got to be a set for value or a flush/two straightening cards as a bluff.
Calling the 3bet from the cutoff generally means you have all the mid-suited connectors and middling pocket pairs that villain doesn't as often.
When the turn brings the flush and the suited ace is on the board, you know they have so few flushes.
Then, when the river brings so many straights, I think people at micro/low stakes fold almost everything if you triple.
That said...they probably don't fold a set of aces, so in that particular spot...I'd have lost a buy-in 😂
Great stuff!! The only decision i would make diffferent is slam dunk calling the KJdd on 4 hearts runout :))
Another great video pete
I was afraid to watch because i fear the dark side. But i was relieved to find i enjoyed this video
good one.
Ignition? 😂
@ 28:20 LOL
More great content, Thanks Pete. All though keep playing this passive and it's going to take you far too long to dust that bankroll off 😉🙂
Wow, you really play not that good, im sorry to say that.
perhaps you could give some timestamps and suggestions of how the play should have been altered at that point.
There is only dark side.Gambling never pays off
Hot take
Except all the times it pays off