It is considered weaker since it has to have all its components as small as possible. That's only in theory though, but it was said a lot about the 2671 so I assume the same is true for amm mini-movements, but I would be wrong. Doesn't mean it's not precise though.
![[1080p60] ETA 2895-2 dismantling and assembling](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DeqD2DIgo-Q/mqdefault.jpg)
![[1080p60] ETA 2895-2 dismantling and assembling](/img/tr.png)
![[1080p60] ETA 7750 dismantling and assembling](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0eAzpgxeqh4/mqdefault.jpg)
![[1080p60] ETA 6497 dismantling and assembling](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PXM2rwHEk6Y/mqdefault.jpg)
![[1080p60] ETA2894-2 (with chronograph module) dismantling and assembling](/img/n.gif)
Is this robust and reliable as 2824 or 2892 ???
It is considered weaker since it has to have all its components as small as possible. That's only in theory though, but it was said a lot about the 2671 so I assume the same is true for amm mini-movements, but I would be wrong. Doesn't mean it's not precise though.
It's a total piece of shit, trust me. It's very unstable and is not a well designed movement.
thank you for the quality tutorial.