I don’t know what exactly it is, but there is something about the way you explain and your videos in generell, that makes it just so easy to grasp everything. Truly fantastic and incredibly helpful!
Excellente qualité de cette vidéo. Les concepts sont abordés de façon claire, extrêmement bien construite, didactique, agréable à entendre, et surtout précise et rigoureuse. Merci, c'est un plaisir.
A huge thank you to you again I'm incredibly excited to learn more about pragmatic from you in minutes. It is much more valuable for 3 hrs lecturering.
Great sir! Could you please post something on optimality theory? Also, if possible, more videos on Syntax with more difficult lessons. Eg - binding theory, wh-movement and so on. Thank you so much.
Dear sir....hats off to your command over English...I could understand clearly. Anyone who would listen to your video will definitely get inspired to improve their vocabulary . suggestions to make video: discourse analysis- interpretation, cohesion, coherance, speech events, co-operative principle sociolinguistics thank you
Waooooooooo Superb!!!!!! Sir! U r doing rally a good job I recently subscribe your channel its fantastic please sir make more video on pragmatics just like this amazing video. 👍
I am a new Linguistics student, going into a test tomorrow, and I have been using your videos to help me understand some of the concepts for Introduction to Linguistics. Thank you for these videos, and I hope you make more soon.
@@christianoronaldo9905 You are better Ronaldo. But you need to capitalize 'khalid' so it would be 'Khalid' because it's a proper noun. and also you have to put a comma before 'but' since it acts as conjunction and separates two independent clauses.
Maaaan, You take too much time to post. We would like to see more of your explanations. I watch you from Morocco. Keep up the good work. I appreciate your efforts. Thanks a lot.
Concerning speech acts, are locutionary, illocutionary and perlocurionary acts equivalents to direct and indirect acts? Thanks for the videos! Really useful.
They are not equivalents, but direct and indirect speech acts involve illocutionary, locutionary, and perlocutionary acts. For example, if you were the student seated by the open window and I say to you, "it sure is cold in here"--that is the locutionary act because that is what was actually said. However, the illocutionary act would be my intention as a speaker: a request for you to close the window, and the perlocutionary act would be how you interpret the meaning of "it sure is cold in here": that you take action to close the window. I hope that helps.
I have some flustered thoughts about inference and presupposition. Are they coming in dual or separate things? Let me explain what I understood after your lecture. The inference is understanding the purpose of the speech while presupposition is understanding the most possible response to the speech. Am I correct sir? It's a very good lecture.
Hi Htut. You're on the right track. Inference is information used by the listener (or reader) to make a connection between what is said and what is meant, but presupposition is information, assumed by the speaker, to be known to the listener. Inference and presupposition happen in real time, as both parties of a conversation help navigate where that conversation goes.
Many thanks for this superb presentation. All in 10 minutes; worth it more than that of a 50 minutes classroom lecture. 👍
Very good and understandable
agree
THIS! 👏👏👏
I totally agree!
Sir, You are truly Great! Thanks for your videos. They are invaluable contribution towards fostering a learning culture.
Thank you, Sir for this very informative video. You made understanding Pragmatics a lot easier. 💚
I don’t know what exactly it is, but there is something about the way you explain and your videos in generell, that makes it just so easy to grasp everything. Truly fantastic and incredibly helpful!
Excellente qualité de cette vidéo. Les concepts sont abordés de façon claire, extrêmement bien construite, didactique, agréable à entendre, et surtout précise et rigoureuse. Merci, c'est un plaisir.
You have made it very easy sir.. I tried reading this from a book and things just went above my head. Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge
I love the simple way you explain these topics.
Just discovered you and you're very fluent and confident. I find your videos soothing and clear, superb love it!! ♥️
A huge thank you to you again I'm incredibly excited to learn more about pragmatic from you in minutes.
It is much more valuable for 3 hrs lecturering.
This is really helpful and might as well be a recommendation to anyone that wants a simpler representation of this branch.
Thank you a lot. Your videos save me from my midterm examination. You are the best.
Very polite and sympathetic way of teaching. Thanks alot sir
You are saving my degrees here, thank you so much for your time and your great explanation
Never stop posting on this channel. You are a saviour in English language 😭😭
Great sir! Could you please post something on optimality theory? Also, if possible, more videos on Syntax with more difficult lessons. Eg - binding theory, wh-movement and so on. Thank you so much.
It's an extraordinary explanation of that linguistics item (( pragmatics)) short and pretty informative. Keep it up sir.
Thanks for sharing ❤
Please keep making more contents for us
Thanks 🙏 a lot for your effort in this important lecture ✍️👍
It was really great. Please sir keep on uploading videos on pragmatics. Waiting for further videos
Dear sir....hats off to your command over English...I could understand clearly. Anyone who would listen to your video will definitely get inspired to improve their vocabulary .
suggestions to make video:
discourse analysis- interpretation, cohesion, coherance, speech events, co-operative principle
sociolinguistics
thank you
Perfect video! Thanks for your work
Thank you for your videos, Evan. They have been incredibly helpful!!
You are my linguistic hero in my deitic center. 😉 thanks so much! 😊
Great explanation...Lots of lv from India
Thanks a lot for sharing. I really liked the way you explained it.
really with no exaggeration you have great prestige while explaining
Great presentation! Very clear for me to understand all these terms, thanks a lot!!
Thank you for this🙏🏽
Something about how you explain concepts in your videos 🙏🏽
Splendid indeed. we need more topics about cross-cultural pragmatic
When you said: "don't use the term deictic center, it would kill the romance," I thought "Unless the partner is a languages' freak/linguist." HAHA
Yes, in that case, if one's partner is a linguist/language nerd, terms such as "deictic center" might turn them on!
@@evanashworth490 absolutely!👀🔥
Ur so good with explaining, Thank you.
Thanks for your efforts!❤❤
Thank you sir for these lecture it was very helpful ❤️💐
This is a whole semester made clear in 10. Thnk you sir🙏
Sir please more videos you are very clear and to the point best videos on tube
THANK YOU SO MUCH, SIR!
Btw i really adore your sense of humor.
brief but rich and reaching presentation
sending my thanks from Algeria. thank u sooooo much great explanation. just excellent.
i do enjoy your lectures a lot.
Thanks for helping me.
It is so precious.
Waooooooooo
Superb!!!!!!
Sir! U r doing rally a good job
I recently subscribe your channel its fantastic please sir make more video on pragmatics just like this amazing video. 👍
You are a really good teacher !
Invaluable ❤
God has granted you a lot of knowledge.
You are definitely just like an ocean!!
Thank you 😊, your way is very enjoyable
Thank you so much for sharing ❤
thank you sir , your teaching has really made things easy for me
wowww this is awesome. it's very clear and super helpful, you deserve more subscribes and views really!
I am a new Linguistics student, going into a test tomorrow, and I have been using your videos to help me understand some of the concepts for Introduction to Linguistics. Thank you for these videos, and I hope you make more soon.
Sir this is amazing can u make more video related this topic??
Well explained ...thx sir
Thank you for your explanation, it's very clear
very helpful... ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
pls make a video about discourse analysis
You're amazing!🔥❤
Tx alot fr such an informative vdeo
Great professor ❤
Not the hero we deserved, but the hero we needed.
Very helpful ❤❤
Thanks a lot. but it would be great to make a simple comparison between descriptive and prescriptive approaches. thanks again
Thank you for the video sir
Very helpful. Many thanks
Hey man you’re perfect teacher ❤
You're the best sir
this was clearly helpful to me thanks a lot!!!
Thanks a bunch very informative
thank you very much i appreciate your neat explication
You are amazing 😻
Good job.... Make a video of discourse analysis.
Thanks sir for the lecture
Hello, really enjoyed your explanation on pragmatic. I’m wondering if you could talk about pragmatic equivalence? Thanks
Superb!
Thank you sir, it was very fruitful video, looking forward to see more....
you are good khalid but you needed to add ''a '' before the word video it was a very fruitful video
@@christianoronaldo9905 You are better Ronaldo. But you need to capitalize 'khalid' so it would be 'Khalid' because it's a proper noun. and also you have to put a comma before 'but' since it acts as conjunction and separates two independent clauses.
@@arazhaqdust88 i know that so well but i really do not have time to punctuate my sentence thanks for your advice
a lucid exposition!!
Very useful. Thanks a lot
Nicely explained
youre are the goat my man
Thank you! It was very helpful!
Thank you, this helped me a lot!!
Maaaan, You take too much time to post. We would like to see more of your explanations. I watch you from Morocco. Keep up the good work. I appreciate your efforts. Thanks a lot.
Love this chanel
Amazing! Thanks!
You're the best
Thanks so much for this! I'm studying last minute for my exam tomorrow (ehehe) and this helped a whole lot.
Now I'M studying last minute for an exam 😂😂
@@Deathist you can do it :D
Thanks it helps me a lot 👍
great video
Great thanks 👍🏼
you literally saved my life
Hello sir
Could you please elaborate your lectures
They ate pretty informative and pertinent but short
Sir, Can you make a video about discourse analysis?
THANK YOU SO MUCH
Awesome lesson! Sir, Just wanted to ask what could be the difference between Dennotative and Lexical meaning?
I would say that they are same thing 🙂
Concerning speech acts, are locutionary, illocutionary and perlocurionary acts equivalents to direct and indirect acts? Thanks for the videos! Really useful.
They are not equivalents, but direct and indirect speech acts involve illocutionary, locutionary, and perlocutionary acts. For example, if you were the student seated by the open window and I say to you, "it sure is cold in here"--that is the locutionary act because that is what was actually said. However, the illocutionary act would be my intention as a speaker: a request for you to close the window, and the perlocutionary act would be how you interpret the meaning of "it sure is cold in here": that you take action to close the window. I hope that helps.
so many thanks 🙏
very informative
thanks that was so so clear 😊🤩🥰
Ich küss dein Herz. In 10 min mehr verstanden als in 4h Vorlesung
ı feel like ı know you for my all life thank you
I love #pragmatics
I have some flustered thoughts about inference and presupposition.
Are they coming in dual or separate things? Let me explain what I understood after your lecture. The inference is understanding the purpose of the speech while presupposition is understanding the most possible response to the speech. Am I correct sir?
It's a very good lecture.
Hi Htut. You're on the right track. Inference is information used by the listener (or reader) to make a connection between what is said and what is meant, but presupposition is information, assumed by the speaker, to be known to the listener. Inference and presupposition happen in real time, as both parties of a conversation help navigate where that conversation goes.
Very good ☺️