Excellente qualité de cette vidéo. Les concepts sont abordés de façon claire, extrêmement bien construite, didactique, agréable à entendre, et surtout précise et rigoureuse. Merci, c'est un plaisir.
Dear sir....hats off to your command over English...I could understand clearly. Anyone who would listen to your video will definitely get inspired to improve their vocabulary . suggestions to make video: discourse analysis- interpretation, cohesion, coherance, speech events, co-operative principle sociolinguistics thank you
Great sir! Could you please post something on optimality theory? Also, if possible, more videos on Syntax with more difficult lessons. Eg - binding theory, wh-movement and so on. Thank you so much.
A huge thank you to you again I'm incredibly excited to learn more about pragmatic from you in minutes. It is much more valuable for 3 hrs lecturering.
Waooooooooo Superb!!!!!! Sir! U r doing rally a good job I recently subscribe your channel its fantastic please sir make more video on pragmatics just like this amazing video. 👍
I am a new Linguistics student, going into a test tomorrow, and I have been using your videos to help me understand some of the concepts for Introduction to Linguistics. Thank you for these videos, and I hope you make more soon.
Nicolas is a French. His wife is a Polish. Page 64 Chopin, Emilia Chopin, Frederic Chopin, Isabella Chopin, Justyna (mother) Chopin, Louise Chopin, Nicolas (father)
@@christianoronaldo9905 You are better Ronaldo. But you need to capitalize 'khalid' so it would be 'Khalid' because it's a proper noun. and also you have to put a comma before 'but' since it acts as conjunction and separates two independent clauses.
I have some flustered thoughts about inference and presupposition. Are they coming in dual or separate things? Let me explain what I understood after your lecture. The inference is understanding the purpose of the speech while presupposition is understanding the most possible response to the speech. Am I correct sir? It's a very good lecture.
Hi Htut. You're on the right track. Inference is information used by the listener (or reader) to make a connection between what is said and what is meant, but presupposition is information, assumed by the speaker, to be known to the listener. Inference and presupposition happen in real time, as both parties of a conversation help navigate where that conversation goes.
Maaaan, You take too much time to post. We would like to see more of your explanations. I watch you from Morocco. Keep up the good work. I appreciate your efforts. Thanks a lot.
Sir, thanks for your Chrystal clear clear explanation. Can you please explain how to answer to the question - "Define the difference between the regional accent and regional dialect?"
Hi Ramona. You might also consider watching my video called "Sociolinguistics", as this question is addressed in that video, but to summarize, a "dialect" is a much broader notion than an "accent". A dialect is basically a regional (or social!) variety of a language (e.g., British English vs. American English; Western American English vs. Southern American English), whereas an accent involves aspects of pronunciation that speakers use in association with a certain dialect (or that listeners use to identify where a speaker is from, regionally or socially). Dialects therefore involve differences in speech/signing at any linguistic level (e.g., phonetic, phonological, morphological, syntactic, semantic), but accents only involve differences as the phonetic and phonological levels. I hope that helps!
I don’t know what exactly it is, but there is something about the way you explain and your videos in generell, that makes it just so easy to grasp everything. Truly fantastic and incredibly helpful!
Concerning speech acts, are locutionary, illocutionary and perlocurionary acts equivalents to direct and indirect acts? Thanks for the videos! Really useful.
They are not equivalents, but direct and indirect speech acts involve illocutionary, locutionary, and perlocutionary acts. For example, if you were the student seated by the open window and I say to you, "it sure is cold in here"--that is the locutionary act because that is what was actually said. However, the illocutionary act would be my intention as a speaker: a request for you to close the window, and the perlocutionary act would be how you interpret the meaning of "it sure is cold in here": that you take action to close the window. I hope that helps.
the distinction between semantics and pragmatics is clear to me but I just cannot understand the difference between discourse and pragmatics. I know that discourse is broader in a sense that it is outside the micros of linguistics, however what does it even stand for?
Hello! This is a tricky question but I'd say that in order to perform discourse analysis in the first place, one must have an understanding of pragmatics (how speakers and listeners determine meaning in context). For me, pragmatics is really a subdiscipline of linguistics, but discourse analysis is not just restricted to linguistics, as this approach is used in communication, sociology, anthropology, and other fields. That is, you can think of pragmatics as an area of study, but discourse analysis is more like a methodology (as an activity that you engage in as a researcher). I hope that helps!
Hello! Unfortunately, I do not--I only have a 3-part video on phonetics on this channel and a couple videos on phonetics on the UBC Visible Speech Channel.
Hi ,Mr Evan thanks for such a good videos ! would you please explain about information structuring / and given new information topic in the context of second language acquisition.
Hi, Simran. You might want to start with this wiki page and take a look at the references provided at the end of that page. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_structure
Many thanks for this superb presentation. All in 10 minutes; worth it more than that of a 50 minutes classroom lecture. 👍
Very good and understandable
agree
THIS! 👏👏👏
I totally agree!
Never stop posting on this channel. You are a saviour in English language 😭😭
Excellente qualité de cette vidéo. Les concepts sont abordés de façon claire, extrêmement bien construite, didactique, agréable à entendre, et surtout précise et rigoureuse. Merci, c'est un plaisir.
Sir, You are truly Great! Thanks for your videos. They are invaluable contribution towards fostering a learning culture.
Splendid indeed. we need more topics about cross-cultural pragmatic
Thank you, Sir for this very informative video. You made understanding Pragmatics a lot easier. 💚
Impeccably taught, it was inevitable from you omniscient sir... you deserver global acknowledgement beyond your wildest confabulations
God has granted you a lot of knowledge.
You are definitely just like an ocean!!
This is really helpful and might as well be a recommendation to anyone that wants a simpler representation of this branch.
You are saving my degrees here, thank you so much for your time and your great explanation
Dear sir....hats off to your command over English...I could understand clearly. Anyone who would listen to your video will definitely get inspired to improve their vocabulary .
suggestions to make video:
discourse analysis- interpretation, cohesion, coherance, speech events, co-operative principle
sociolinguistics
thank you
Thank you a lot. Your videos save me from my midterm examination. You are the best.
Very polite and sympathetic way of teaching. Thanks alot sir
I love the simple way you explain these topics.
Just discovered you and you're very fluent and confident. I find your videos soothing and clear, superb love it!! ♥️
You have made it very easy sir.. I tried reading this from a book and things just went above my head. Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge
Thanks for sharing ❤
Please keep making more contents for us
This is a whole semester made clear in 10. Thnk you sir🙏
Great sir! Could you please post something on optimality theory? Also, if possible, more videos on Syntax with more difficult lessons. Eg - binding theory, wh-movement and so on. Thank you so much.
It was really great. Please sir keep on uploading videos on pragmatics. Waiting for further videos
When you said: "don't use the term deictic center, it would kill the romance," I thought "Unless the partner is a languages' freak/linguist." HAHA
Yes, in that case, if one's partner is a linguist/language nerd, terms such as "deictic center" might turn them on!
@@evanashworth490 absolutely!👀🔥
A huge thank you to you again I'm incredibly excited to learn more about pragmatic from you in minutes.
It is much more valuable for 3 hrs lecturering.
It's an extraordinary explanation of that linguistics item (( pragmatics)) short and pretty informative. Keep it up sir.
Being simple yet having a lot of information, I like listening to you!
Sir please more videos you are very clear and to the point best videos on tube
Waooooooooo
Superb!!!!!!
Sir! U r doing rally a good job
I recently subscribe your channel its fantastic please sir make more video on pragmatics just like this amazing video. 👍
Thanks a lot for sharing. I really liked the way you explained it.
wowww this is awesome. it's very clear and super helpful, you deserve more subscribes and views really!
I am a new Linguistics student, going into a test tomorrow, and I have been using your videos to help me understand some of the concepts for Introduction to Linguistics. Thank you for these videos, and I hope you make more soon.
really with no exaggeration you have great prestige while explaining
thank you sir , your teaching has really made things easy for me
You are my linguistic hero in my deitic center. 😉 thanks so much! 😊
Great explanation...Lots of lv from India
Great presentation! Very clear for me to understand all these terms, thanks a lot!!
Thanks 🙏 a lot for your effort in this important lecture ✍️👍
Hello, really enjoyed your explanation on pragmatic. I’m wondering if you could talk about pragmatic equivalence? Thanks
Thank you so much for this comprehensible explanation. I hope you will make more videos.
THANK YOU SO MUCH, SIR!
Btw i really adore your sense of humor.
Thank you for this🙏🏽
Something about how you explain concepts in your videos 🙏🏽
Not the hero we deserved, but the hero we needed.
Hey man you’re perfect teacher ❤
Sir this is amazing can u make more video related this topic??
sending my thanks from Algeria. thank u sooooo much great explanation. just excellent.
Ur so good with explaining, Thank you.
i do enjoy your lectures a lot.
Nicolas is a French. His wife is a Polish.
Page 64
Chopin, Emilia
Chopin, Frederic
Chopin, Isabella
Chopin, Justyna (mother)
Chopin, Louise
Chopin, Nicolas (father)
Thank you sir, it was very fruitful video, looking forward to see more....
you are good khalid but you needed to add ''a '' before the word video it was a very fruitful video
@@christianoronaldo9905 You are better Ronaldo. But you need to capitalize 'khalid' so it would be 'Khalid' because it's a proper noun. and also you have to put a comma before 'but' since it acts as conjunction and separates two independent clauses.
@@arazhaqdust88 i know that so well but i really do not have time to punctuate my sentence thanks for your advice
Compare "the dog turned on the man" to "the dog turned the man on."
I channel J.L. Austin a lot.
Thanks so much for this! I'm studying last minute for my exam tomorrow (ehehe) and this helped a whole lot.
Now I'M studying last minute for an exam 😂😂
@@Deathist you can do it :D
Thank you for your videos, Evan. They have been incredibly helpful!!
Hello sir
Could you please elaborate your lectures
They ate pretty informative and pertinent but short
Perfect video! Thanks for your work
Thank you 😊, your way is very enjoyable
I have some flustered thoughts about inference and presupposition.
Are they coming in dual or separate things? Let me explain what I understood after your lecture. The inference is understanding the purpose of the speech while presupposition is understanding the most possible response to the speech. Am I correct sir?
It's a very good lecture.
Hi Htut. You're on the right track. Inference is information used by the listener (or reader) to make a connection between what is said and what is meant, but presupposition is information, assumed by the speaker, to be known to the listener. Inference and presupposition happen in real time, as both parties of a conversation help navigate where that conversation goes.
this was clearly helpful to me thanks a lot!!!
Thanks for your efforts!❤❤
Thank you sir for these lecture it was very helpful ❤️💐
You are a really good teacher !
Good job.... Make a video of discourse analysis.
I love your examples
brief but rich and reaching presentation
Thanks for helping me.
It is so precious.
Thank you for your explanation, it's very clear
Maaaan, You take too much time to post. We would like to see more of your explanations. I watch you from Morocco. Keep up the good work. I appreciate your efforts. Thanks a lot.
very helpful... ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
pls make a video about discourse analysis
Thank you for the video sir
very great and easy to understand, but why the subtitle is korean auto-generated lol
Thanks a lot. but it would be great to make a simple comparison between descriptive and prescriptive approaches. thanks again
Sir, thanks for your Chrystal clear clear explanation. Can you please explain how to answer to the question - "Define the difference between the regional accent and regional dialect?"
Hi Ramona. You might also consider watching my video called "Sociolinguistics", as this question is addressed in that video, but to summarize, a "dialect" is a much broader notion than an "accent". A dialect is basically a regional (or social!) variety of a language (e.g., British English vs. American English; Western American English vs. Southern American English), whereas an accent involves aspects of pronunciation that speakers use in association with a certain dialect (or that listeners use to identify where a speaker is from, regionally or socially). Dialects therefore involve differences in speech/signing at any linguistic level (e.g., phonetic, phonological, morphological, syntactic, semantic), but accents only involve differences as the phonetic and phonological levels. I hope that helps!
Thank you, Sir they mean alot@@evanashworth490
Thanks a bunch very informative
you really need to listen to this guy
at the end: wait, he can see us?
You are amazing 😻
youre are the goat my man
I'm so grateful to you
Invaluable ❤
Very helpful. Many thanks
Plz make a vdo on pragmatics theory of meaning
Awesome lesson! Sir, Just wanted to ask what could be the difference between Dennotative and Lexical meaning?
I would say that they are same thing 🙂
You're amazing!🔥❤
Sir, Can you make a video about discourse analysis?
I don’t know what exactly it is, but there is something about the way you explain and your videos in generell, that makes it just so easy to grasp everything. Truly fantastic and incredibly helpful!
Hello sir
How diectic expressions refer to world outside linguistic context ?
thank you very much i appreciate your neat explication
Thank you so much 4 your time sir
Great professor ❤
Concerning speech acts, are locutionary, illocutionary and perlocurionary acts equivalents to direct and indirect acts? Thanks for the videos! Really useful.
They are not equivalents, but direct and indirect speech acts involve illocutionary, locutionary, and perlocutionary acts. For example, if you were the student seated by the open window and I say to you, "it sure is cold in here"--that is the locutionary act because that is what was actually said. However, the illocutionary act would be my intention as a speaker: a request for you to close the window, and the perlocutionary act would be how you interpret the meaning of "it sure is cold in here": that you take action to close the window. I hope that helps.
Thank you! It was very helpful!
Thank you, this helped me a lot!!
Amazing👏
Ich küss dein Herz. In 10 min mehr verstanden als in 4h Vorlesung
Enriching
you literally saved my life
Nicely explained
the distinction between semantics and pragmatics is clear to me but I just cannot understand the difference between discourse and pragmatics. I know that discourse is broader in a sense that it is outside the micros of linguistics, however what does it even stand for?
Hello! This is a tricky question but I'd say that in order to perform discourse analysis in the first place, one must have an understanding of pragmatics (how speakers and listeners determine meaning in context). For me, pragmatics is really a subdiscipline of linguistics, but discourse analysis is not just restricted to linguistics, as this approach is used in communication, sociology, anthropology, and other fields. That is, you can think of pragmatics as an area of study, but discourse analysis is more like a methodology (as an activity that you engage in as a researcher). I hope that helps!
@@evanashworth490 oh, I see. it helped indeed. Thank you very much!
Well explained ...thx sir
Have you got a video on naturalness in phonetics?
Hello! Unfortunately, I do not--I only have a 3-part video on phonetics on this channel and a couple videos on phonetics on the UBC Visible Speech Channel.
I love #pragmatics
Hi ,Mr Evan thanks for such a good videos ! would you please explain about information structuring / and given new information topic in the context of second language acquisition.
Hi, Simran. You might want to start with this wiki page and take a look at the references provided at the end of that page.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_structure
@@evanashworth490 thank you so much ,Mr Evan ! Well all discription provided there 🙏🏻
Superb!