Federer vs Hewitt - All 27 H2H Match Points (HD)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ค. 2020
- Subscribe for more H2H videos !
Full list of matches:
Year • Winner • Tournament - Round • Score
1999 • Hewitt • Lyon - R32 • 7-6(4) 2-6 6-4
2000 • Hewitt • Davis Cup - WG R1 • 6-2 3-6 7-6(2) 6-1
2000 • Hewitt • Montreal - R64 • 3-6 6-3 6-2
2000 • Federer • Basel - SF • 6-4 5-7 7-6(6)
2001 • Hewitt • 's-Hertogenbosch - SF • 6-4 6-2
2002 • Federer • Miami - SF • 6-3 6-4
2002 • Hewitt • Paris - QF • 6-4 6-4
2002 • Hewitt • WTF - SF • 7-5 5-7 7-5
2003 • Hewitt • Davis Cup - WG SF • 5-7 2-6 7-6(4) 7-5 6-1
2004 • Federer • Australian Open - R16 • 4-6 6-3 6-0 6-4
2004 • Federer • Hamburg - SF • 6-0 6-4
2004 • Federer • Wimbledon - QF • 6-1 6-7(1) 6-0 6-4
2004 • Federer • US Open - F • 6-0 7-6(3) 6-0
2004 • Federer • WTF - RR • 6-3 6-4
2004 • Federer • WTF - F • 6-3 6-2
2005 • Federer • Indian Wells - F • 6-2 6-4 6-4
2005 • Federer • Wimbledon - SF • 6-3 6-4 7-6(1)
2005 • Federer • US Open - SF • 6-3 7-6 (0) 4-6 6-3
2007 • Federer • Montreal - QF • 6-3 6-4
2007 • Federer • Cincinnati - SF • 6-3 6-7(7) 7-6(1)
2008 • Federer • Wimbledon - R16 • 7-6(7) 6-2 6-4
2009 • Federer • Cincinnati - QF • 6-3 6-4
2009 • Federer • US Open - R32 • 4-6 6-3 7-5 6-4
2010 • Federer • Australian Open - R16 • 6-2 6-3 6-4
2010 • Hewitt • Halle - F • 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4
2011 • Federer • Davis Cup - RR • 5-7 7-6(5) 6-2 6-3
2014 • Hewitt • Brisbane - F • 6-1 4-6 6-3
#H2H #tennis - กีฬา
At least Hewitt can go around saying
"Federer? Yeah he was good, but I beat him last time we played!"
2-6 to 19-8, what a comeback from Fed
Murray was also 6-2 vs. Federer once upon a time (tho Fed I think was a lot like Sampras- didn't take non-slam matches too too seriously, tho sometimes like Shanghai 2010 he did get stomped)
@@jjfutbol11 No its because in a best of 3 its easier for the lesser player to win.
6-13 to 27-23, what a comeback from 🐐 No1e
@@alexandermirkov970 Your Novak is 6 year younger than Federer. Nadal is better
@@alexandermirkov970 that's about Federer between Hewitt. Who cares your Djobronze😂😂😂
As a Hewitt`s fan I have to admit that Federer is genius.
After Davis Cup 2003, after match like THAT another player would be broken mentally. But not Federer. Instead he improve his game - serve return, speed, baseliner abilities, very soon won Masters Cup and after AO 2004 became invincible for Hewitt. Who would imagine that this was Hewitt`s last victory over Federer until... 2010th?
At his prime Hewitt was fast , motivated, best defense player. Best lob ever!!!
Nadal's defense was so good it was a weapon. But yeah, still very underrated and 04-07 was very far from the "weak era" Peak Fed made it seem to be
Hi guys I just wanted to rectify a little mistake in the video (2-7 and not 3-6 for Davis Cup 2003). Because of that, the final H2H is 18-9 and not 17-8.
As well I had to delete one match point due to copyright, hope you’ll still enjoy it 😉
-2004 • Federer • US Open - F • 6-0 7-6(3) 6-0
Keep the suggestions coming, I will try to use the most of them for future videos 🤙😉
Federer vs Berdych
Nadal vs Ferrer
Federer vs DelPo
Djokovic vs Raonic/Roddick
Nadal vs Agassi
Karlovic match points, just because that would be so many match points in short time.
1:42 it was Hewitt who beated Federer at Davis Cup 2003 coming back from 2-0 set and 5-3 down...
Awesome video! It's funny. People who say that Federer is better now than he was 15 years ago should look at his H2H against Hewitt and Roddick. During Federer's prime from 2004-2007 he was 12-0 against Hewitt, but after that he was 5-2. From 2004-2007 he was 8-0 against Roddick, but after that he was 6-2. It's not like Federer became a horrible player after his prime, but he definitely started losing matches that he never lost when he was high in confidence during his prime.
Love knowing tennis pros h2h not enough people do this
Thanks for your support man 🙌
@@tennischill8711 no worries
Saying Fed's prime ended at 26 is ridiculous though. Just because Nadal and Novak were good enough to start beating him. Fed was 15-0 against Hewitt up to 2010. So cherrypicking these windows of H2H is not telling the full story.
@@Romans8-9 huh? I wasn’t referring to Rafa and Djokovic. I was just pointing out he wasn’t as consistently good after 2007 as he was before. As evidence, he started losing to his rivals more often.
yes finally thanks man for this H2H
Glad you enjoy it man 🙌👍
Wow didn't know Hewitt was dominant at the beginning
Same happened in the Nalbandián-Federer rivalry in the beginning. Federer fought hard and had to adjust to beat those guys
Are you kidding? Everyone knows that Hewitt and Nalbandian are main reasons why Federer is so good. Federer`s idol in tennis was Pete Sampras, so Federer also tried to be serve&volley player like Sampras, but against Nalbandian and Hewitt that "old fashion" style did not work. Federer understood tht is time to change something. In autumn 2003 Federer decided to change his serve&volley for more modern style, improved baseliner skills... And in Australian Open 2004 he beated both of them - Hewitt and Nalbandian (he defeated Nalbandian first time in Masters Cup 2003).
@@josequintero8615 No. Thats not correct.
Federer was too young before 2003., he was still very very weak mentally.
I remember many matches against Hewitt in a period
2000.-2002.he lost because his mental game wasnt on the best level yet.
Later 2003 on 13 straight wins over Hewitt.
@@TheRanger866 wow that's incredible knowledge we never knew thanks 🎾👍 pretty sure nowadays everyone's idol is 1 of the top 3 haha like ours aha we even posted once a video of Federer
I you read Federer‘s biography written by René Stauffer (a Swiss sports journalist, who updates his edition regularly, so I would wait and buy it until Federer retires), you will see that it was a mix between his serve-and-volley style but also his mental weakness at the beginning of his career that made Federer lose to Hewitt so often. Especially his problems at the beginning of his career are very interestingly depicted in this great book.
That Davis Cup win from 0-2 by sets in 2003 totally changed the dynamics of this rivalry
Before that Hewitt always felt more confident and superior, even when Roger was playing much better which resulted in 6-2 run in favor of Lleyton. From that Davis Cup win when Roger overcome himself and crushed Lleyton, it was already 17-2 in favor of Federer
The same dynamics changes could be find in Roger's rivalries with Nadal (23-10 in favor of Nadal prior to AO-17 and 6-1 in favor of Roger from that moment) and Djokovic (10-4 in favor of Roger prior to US-10 and 23-13 in favor od Djokovic after that match)
That shift in the Roger-Novak head to head probably has more to do with Novak entering his prime and there being a lot of matches between the two when Roger was well past his prime years.
The info in this video is incorrect. It was Hewitt who came from 2 sets down to beat Federer in that Davis cup semi-final. Federer said it was one of the worst losses of his career. After that match the h2h was 7-2 in Hewitt's favor. Hewitt had also beaten Federer at the Hopman cup in an exo, so the overall h2h was 8-2 when Federer turned it around from 2004 onwards
thomas voglis That AO match in 2004 was really the turning point for Roger.
@@kifinov1239 Yes it was. as an Aussie it hurts to watch, but from 04' Fed really did have Hewitt figured out. I think that match was extra important as he finally managed to beat his contemporary rival Hewitt on the same court that he lost that Davis cup semi. Following his 2003 Master Cup victory Federer reached a new level of confidence and consistency that he carried into 04'
@@thomasvoglis7063 thank you thought I was going crazy. I knew Hewitt had won the Davis Cup 2003 against Federer. They really need to do better research.
From 2-7 to 18-9, last match is a victory from Hewitt.
the date of the confrontation is very important ...
In 2001,2002 Hewitt was the terror man against almost all players like sampras, federer, Agassi, Kuerten, kafelnikov, ect
Yes.. When Sampras was far from his prime, at the end of his career and when Fed was young and stupid..
When Fed matured in 2003.
13 straight wins over Hewitt..
With several sets 60..
Us open finals
60 76 60 hahaha
@Aaron Maher Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahaah
Limited tennis knowledge???
Haahahahahahahahahah
Hahaahahahahahahahahah
Wow.
You said everything with your first sentence.
Hewitt had a decent 1st serve gahabaababababab
Ahahahahahaah
I got nothing to say to you.
Really.
@@jonbonesmahomes7472 Meh Sampras won the last slam he ever played. To make out like he was past it is not giving due credit to Hewitt. Sampras def didnt seem past it in 01 Wimbledon against Federer.
@@Romans8-9 So what?
Nadal also won AO now ,waaaay past his prime..
Ps .sampras 2001 against Fed was 30% below his best ..
@@jonbonesmahomes7472 Federer had a similar time line to Sampras. Both were most successful from 22-29 and slowed down at 30-31. I think it’s amazing how Federer had the extra decade and prolonged his longevity. He adapted his game and learned to shorten points with added variety. The young Hewitt was very strong and had Federer’s number and all the other top guys but his reign at the top was shorter and injury affected his play.
In 2003, the winner was Hewitt not Federer.
Where's the US Open 2004 final?
Please do the same with Federer vs Haas
I think you’re missing at least one match. In 2014 Hewitt beat Federer in Brisbane in 3 sets
At 1-3, it still showed 2 match points only!
not bad looking in numbers, but that 11 yr streak of 2003=2013 when Roger won mostly would affect any player's morale after each game..
Hewitt was never the same player after injury. He was almost as good but something was lost and at that level, it’s the small things that make the difference. He used to beat Federer as youngsters but something was lost.
Before 2004 (Fast Courts) Hewitt was the better man...
After 2004 (Slower Courts) Federer was the better man...
Courts were still fast until 2006.
It had more to do with Lleyton's declining due to injuries, and Federer reaching his prime.
I think that is due to the australian entraineur of Hewitt (2003-2007) who ended also the carrers of Safin and Tsonga : Roger Rasheed.
@@gardada Spot on.
@@masters.1000 ?
No. You dont understand man.
Before 2003.Fed was weak mentally and still very young.
Then he fixed his head and started to dominate Hewitt..
O rememever many matches 2000.2001.2002.where young Fed wasnt good with his mental game
Shouldn't their match in 2000 Canada be in Toronto??
Hewitt beat Federer only twice when fed was old and level has dropped . The rest of the time he was losing 100% during feds prime years. Still a respectable record though.
Ллейтон суперово грав.
Hewitt nalbandian
Federer won 15 match in a row
Final score was 19-7 not 19-8
Federer didn't have the toughest of competition early in his career with the likes of Hewitt and roddick.
Obviously. Yes.
Thats correct.
Hewitt had an edge over young immature Federer but once Fed fixed his head, 13 straight wins over Hewitt with several 60 sets..
Us ooen finals
60.76 60 dismantled him.
Hewitt, Safin, Moya, Nalbandian, Kuerten, Agassi, Sampras off top of my head. Both Hewitt & Safin destroyed Sampras at USO, so yeah, pretty tough.
@@Nirky Yes.. Destroyed.. When?
Tell me when..
I ll tell you..
When Sampras was far from his absolute prime.
Hewitt wouldnt stand a chance against 90'sSampras
@@Nirky sure, but Federer was younger. He totally dominated his peers. Hewitt got overtaken by everybody. And then came Nadal, djokovic and going beyond Federer.
@@jonbonesmahomes7472 Sampras was 29 when Safin destroyed him, and just turned 30 when Hewitt did likewise. Sampras would go on to win USO in '02 and retire. I guess he had a relatively short "prime". :)
Hewitt didn't deserve to win any majors. He's lucky he played in such a weak era
Nonsense. You know sod all about tennis. Hewitt played against some extremely strong players. Your remark is so disrespectful. A good match to watch is Halle 2010 vs Federer on both their favourite surface.
What an idiot