A short history of AWACS

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @traveler5566
    @traveler5566 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +18

    Y’all do a truly incredible job. From presentation to historical videos you source the videos are always documentary quality. Quite honestly better than the documentary’s most of us grew up with.

  • @ComfortsSpecter
    @ComfortsSpecter 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +14

    Probably gonna be the best presentation of the subject on TH-cam for awhile
    Ofocurse, mostly because there’s very few Good competitors
    Common Casual versus Proper Formal Literacy
    Adorable lesson in how Practical Specification work

  • @janusz4156
    @janusz4156 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +11

    Boeing E-767 - the main AWACS in Ace Combat series. 30 years of Ace Combat series in 2025.

  • @alanhelton
    @alanhelton 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    Such a well narrated and presented channel !

    • @demun6065
      @demun6065 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I’ve only recently found this channel. On narration, I have a question…
      Does the real creator of this channel hire a narrator? Because this guy has a British accent, but it’s “Australian aviation”…
      Just curious, it’s really great info in these videos!

  • @wk7337
    @wk7337 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Would love a P-8a Poseidon/history of patrol aircraft video and or a special ops aircraft video! This was great

  • @benvandermerwe4934
    @benvandermerwe4934 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great historical journalism and professional presentation. Thanks.

  • @rkc62
    @rkc62 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    One of the best videos to date. Great work.

  • @louiswilkins9624
    @louiswilkins9624 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great video

  • @dauvone.5772
    @dauvone.5772 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    True work of art, keep up the good work

  • @mikegrew7446
    @mikegrew7446 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Hopefully Canada will acquire the wedgetail someday.

    • @charlesdorval394
      @charlesdorval394 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ... why?

    • @KuostA
      @KuostA 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@charlesdorval394 ........why not? odd comment. isn't the answer obvious....? why else does every country want it?

  • @joshuarees4342
    @joshuarees4342 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you! 😀

  • @petesheppard1709
    @petesheppard1709 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I was hoping to have heard more about the RN's helo-based AEW. Lacking conventional CATOBAR carriers, that's the only way they can have airborne radars at sea.

  • @rogerjohnson6676
    @rogerjohnson6676 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Excellent video again, sure hope the E-7 isn’t based on the MAX.

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    they boost signals between satellites and aircrafts and army on ground

  • @briancooper2112
    @briancooper2112 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Great plane. Ready for retirement.

  • @mi1400
    @mi1400 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    we helped u making AWACS a signature term and a word to recon with ... though we didnt like it very much when spending summers with us :|

  • @nelsongomez8267
    @nelsongomez8267 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nice=)

  • @tamzidkarim9402
    @tamzidkarim9402 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    A day after Christmas of 2024, China just unveiled their upcoming KJ 3000 based on the Y 20 strategic airlifter, while the PLA navy is also gearing up for the carrier based KJ 600.

  • @Reachforitify
    @Reachforitify 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "
    " Several falling outs " thats so funny.

  • @Vansh-b3g
    @Vansh-b3g 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Hi why won't you make a video on upcoming weapons of India
    We would love to watch that

  • @chandrachurniyogi8394
    @chandrachurniyogi8394 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    the AWACS classification of special mission aircraft by the USAF is wholly inaccurate . . . Airborne Early Warning & Control or AEW&C is the actual correct term . . .

    • @thelandofnod123
      @thelandofnod123 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      The Sentry and the JSDF 767 based AEW&C utilise the specific package known as AWACS. All the platforms are either AEW&C or AEW, however only these two carry the AWAC system.

    • @chandrachurniyogi8394
      @chandrachurniyogi8394 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @thelandofnod123 care to elaborate on the specific package thing if possible . . .

    • @thelandofnod123
      @thelandofnod123 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@chandrachurniyogi8394 “Special package thing”?

    • @einfisch3891
      @einfisch3891 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It's almost like he said that in the video, you should watch it, it's pretty good.

    • @chandrachurniyogi8394
      @chandrachurniyogi8394 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@thelandofnod123 sorry my bad what is specific package???

  • @oxcart4172
    @oxcart4172 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Anyone else seen that Chinese AEW platform? Grumman should sue!

    • @geoflewis204
      @geoflewis204 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Stolen by Israel .. Sold to China ..

    • @willdsm08
      @willdsm08 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Grumman should check its hires and computer security systems.

  • @jamesjross
    @jamesjross 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I didn't like Linebacker 2. Sequels are never as good as the original. I felt the same about Rocky.

    • @petesheppard1709
      @petesheppard1709 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      In the case of LINEBACKER, the sequel was far better. LINEBACKER I restricted B-52s to missions in S. VIetnam. With LINEBACKER II, the BUFFs were turned loose on the North, and the N. Vietnamese quickly decided to negotiate in earnest.