Yeah i notice that, i check the background (author & content inside) - sometimes i didn't check well, i choose the best, deep & 2nd hand cheap. Thanks for the info
Johnathan Sarfati has a commentary book on Genesis. There are a lot of prophecies in the OT about a day of judgement that happened in Maccabees, and also about the day of judgement 70 AD.
Hi Dr. Shanks, would you possibly do a TH-cam video on some of the commentaries that you would recommend? I have been researching all of these: (NIV application set, NICOT/NICNT set, Believers Bible commentary, word biblical commentary set, The Bible Knowledge commentary OT & NT, Baker Exegetical set, The New American commentary, & the IVP Bible Background OT & NT commentary to name a few). Just wanting some direction on ones out of these that you may recommend for the layperson? I have read the entire Bible, but want to dive deeper in my studies of course, but will be brand new to using commentaries. Thank you and God Bless!
That is a possibility, I will have to mull that one over. Is there a particular book in the Bible that you are thinking about getting a commentary for your studies?
@@askabibleprof7099I wanted to try to get a large commentary set where there is a volume for every book of the Bible (maybe like NICOT/NICNT), along with maybe a two volume commentary (maybe like the Bible knowledge set.) As far as books of the Bible, I do want to dive deeper in to Revelation and 1&2 Corinthians. I tend to lean more to the continuationism side than cessationism, but would like to go more in depth with studies on both views. When looking at authors/scholars of commentaries, I am unsure of who I should probably look more into on the study of continuationism.
Here's a list: _The Jewish Annotated New Testament_ by Amy-Jill Levine (Editor), Marc Zvi Brettler (Editor) _The Jewish Study Bible:_ Second Edition by Adele Berlin (Editor), Marc Zvi Brettler (Editor) _The Jewish Annotated Apocrypha_ by Jonathan Klawans (Editor), Lawrence M. Wills (Editor) _The New Oxford Annotated Bible with Apocrypha:_ Fifth Edition: New Revised Standard Version: by Michael Coogan (Editor), Marc Brettler (Editor), Carol Newsom (Editor), Pheme Perkins (Editor) _HarperCollins Study Bible:_ Fully Revised & Updated by Harold W. Attridge (Author), Society of Biblical Literature (Author) _The SBL Study Bible_ Hardcover - November 21, 2023 by Society of Biblical Literature (Author) A thoroughly revised edition of The HarperCollins Study Bible _Fortress Commentary on the Bible: Two Volume Set_ Kindle Edition by Gale A. Yee (Author), Matthew J. M. Coomber (Editor), Margaret Aymer (Editor
@@gmac6503 Great, you provided a bibliography, but what does that prove? Anyone can do the same and they don't have to have a substantive position on any particular issue or an original thought of your own. It's kind of boring to be truthful.
@@askabibleprof7099 i have Mr. fake professor. provided a couple of sources so they can learn on their own, and you never do respond to points I do make so I really don't care how you want to have your followers just follow you. You're unlearned, sir.
I don't have any of the commentaries you have mentioned. So my ability to comment of them is very limited. What I do know is that they are very dated. That's not to say they don't have value or any good insights. Nevertheless, I personally try to use more current commentaries. I do this simply because so much has been learned and discovered since the late 18th century. So if you have any of these, then good, but I would start to incrementally supplement your library with more current commentaries. Hope that helps.
He's a FAKE bible prof. He does not even have a library lol. I have all 3 you mentioned. Gill is a hyper cal and Spurgeon admits that while Clarke is your Arminian defender and his opinion on the serpent is amusing while Barnes is hard to find I think but ok. You have to remember they are all outdated though. The prof here has no idea who they are. lol
I bit the bullet and bought Logos 8 Bible software. Logos 8 is pricey but worth it if you can swing it. I can pick and chose which commentaries I want, buy particular commentary series, and make inter-commentator comparisons at deep discounts to print copies. Logos 8 has been a total game-changer to my biblical studies...I'll never go back to print copies. Yes, there is an extensive array of lousy commentaries about forwarding liberal, progressive, and just plain heretical pseudo-doctrines angling for a popular audience. I tend to compare different expositors to piece together what makes expositional, theological, contextual, and systematic sense on passages. I like Moo, Block, Bruce, Walvoord, Zuck, and a couple others. The only "evangelical preacher" commentary series I'd heartily recommend is John MacArthur's...but the cost here is upward of $600.00 (buy a book or two at a time and grow your library). MacArthur is also worth it you're a died-in-the wool Calvinist-leaning type (like me). Your advice here is fantastic for serious Bible students...particularly your admonition about commentaries offering "exegetical comments" that range from simply incorrect to off-the-rails bizarre.
James; right, electronic commentaries can be found at a considerable savings. The problem for me is that as you know, I'm at a computer looking at a screen all the time. Consequently, I prefer hard print because it gives my eyes a break, and I can read them even if there is a power outage. Some times I just need to get away from my desk.
Great vid. I'm considering buying some biblical books (including bibles) , and glad I came accross your channel. You've made some great points in this video. Thx for posting.
Interesting, can you be more specific? Is it your assertion that Kind David never existed, or that the biblical record regarding him is an invention? Can you be more precise?
@@askabibleprof7099 why don't you buy the book since it's only $1.99 and read it for yourself. He is a scholar and I know you don't like them but why don't you read it and give us what you think. OK clown. The guy has never heard of Joe Baden or John Collins, who has the best commentary on Daniel. Oh wait, they're from Yale so he's not gonna bother tell me something why don't you tell me what you think about king David that ain't gonna happen he never responds to questions.
@@askabibleprof7099 he asked me if I could be more specific, but I didn't give a commentary on the commentary I mentioned. I didn't give an opinion at all. This clown can't have a conversation with anybody who he knows can derail him in seconds. It's like the dude who claims that he could beat up Mike Tyson and yet never went to the gym to challenge him. This guy is a joke buy the book
Yeah, stay with your own people who agree with you. Ya know the believers who you agree with. Not a good practice, folks. I recommend Joel S Baden and David M Carr on Genesis. There are many others but here are two that will keep you busy.
Once again, I have to apologize for this late reply. I'm not sure why YT doesn't place them were I can find them. But once again, you are simply appealing to someone else's authority. Is there a specific point in the video that you wish to challenge? Lastly, I never suggest that my students "not" read positions that they disagree with, but only that they also read scholars that provide arguments from the biblical text revealing why some positions are poorly defended and contrary to the evidence.
@@askabibleprof7099 once again, he just doesn't respond to the point. Anyway, read the scholars. He has a problem with that and he doesn't want his followers to read scholars because that's appealing to authority. What a joke.
@@askabibleprof7099 he has no idea who are the names I mentioned are. I would be so embarrassed if I were he. He doesn't even acknowledge that. He knows the names. Lol that's why when I respond to his videos I deal in the third person. It's for people that really want to study the Bible, and he's not one of them
@@askabibleprof7099 they got the point. They know who the scholars are. You don't. I already know this. It's funny when the so-called Bible professor doesn't want sources named who are the best scholars in the field, but we know how you apologists are. You're making a fool out of yourself not even recognizing names. Keep up the good work.
@@gmac6503 I'm not sure others get anything, you simply promote scholars that you agree with, you never make any kind of substantive assertion of your own from any particular text. You stand on the shoulders of others, you never make an original observation of your own. How it that a defensible position?
Glad to hear that you benefited. Any commentary that provides you with greater insight into the truth and trustworthiness of scriptures while also strengthening your faith in them and the Lord is a very good commentary. Blessings.
@@askabibleprof7099 Sorry, I didn't know that was the spelling of it. Cursed youtube subtitles. Good content, definitely something to ponder on my next purchase
Hi, would you possibly do a TH-cam video on some of the commentaries that you would recommend? I have been researching all of these: (NIV application set, NICOT/NICNT set, Believers Bible commentary, word biblical commentary set, The Bible Knowledge commentary OT & NT, Baker Exegetical set, The New American commentary, & the IVP Bible Background OT & NT commentary to name a few). Just wanting some direction on ones out of these that you may recommend for the layperson? I have read the entire Bible, but want to dive deeper in my studies of course, but will be brand new to using commentaries. Thank you and God Bless!
Dr.Shanks, you have discussed well and laid down the key points. Would you also recommend some good Commentaries from an Evangelical and Scholarly point of view. Thanks so much for the good discourse !
Actually, I will be doing some videos on these types of questions in the future. The next will probably focus on how to determine which commentary is best for the individual. I suspect that one will be available in about a month, right now I am in a heavy grading period, so my time is very limited. I am also currently doing the script for how to write a biblical research paper, but that will be more than a month out. Thanks for asking.
Why not read scholars? Evangelical and Scholarly do not go together normally. Here's a list _The Jewish Annotated New Testament_ by Amy-Jill Levine (Editor), Marc Zvi Brettler (Editor) _The Jewish Study Bible:_ Second Edition by Adele Berlin (Editor), Marc Zvi Brettler (Editor) _The Jewish Annotated Apocrypha_ by Jonathan Klawans (Editor), Lawrence M. Wills (Editor) _The New Oxford Annotated Bible with Apocrypha:_ Fifth Edition: New Revised Standard Version: by Michael Coogan (Editor), Marc Brettler (Editor), Carol Newsom (Editor), Pheme Perkins (Editor) _HarperCollins Study Bible:_ Fully Revised & Updated by Harold W. Attridge (Author), Society of Biblical Literature (Author) _The SBL Study Bible_ Hardcover - November 21, 2023 by Society of Biblical Literature (Author) A thoroughly revised edition of The HarperCollins Study Bible _Fortress Commentary on the Bible: Two Volume Set_ Kindle Edition by Gale A. Yee (Author), Matthew J. M. Coomber (Editor), Margaret Aymer (Editor
The commentary that recognizes the book of Genesis and other "history" books of the Old Testament are myths and that many of the stories in these books are based on mythologies from the ancient Near East is a good scholar. I would gladly buy that scholar's commentary. Recommended Reading: "Ancient Near Eastern Thought & the Old Testament" by John H. Walton
I appreciate the interaction, but regrettably I must disagree with Dr Walton. Many of his conclusions, assumptions, not to mention aspects of his methodology contains catastrophic flaws. Please consider the interviews with Dr. Oswalt on this channel, maybe start with this one: th-cam.com/video/iiSE778y288/w-d-xo.html.
@@askabibleprof7099 "Catastrophic flaws"? Dr Walton is a highly respected Old Testament scholar and doesn't make any "conclusions" or "assumptions" in that book. If you've read it, you'll recall that he stated in the introduction that he's not trying to convince you that the Old Testament is based on myths, but is just laying out the facts and letting you decide for yourself. No assumptions, no conclusions. EDIT: I'll refute the video you recommended either tomorrow or this weekend.
@@txfreethinker Again, thanks for watching. That may be what Dr. Walton implies in his book, but he has gone on record, stating that the OT contains pagan mythology. He's embraced the same flawed biases and presuppositions of modern secular and liberal scholars who have failed to understand (or maybe respect is a better concept) the corrective nature of the OT. For example, many ancient pagan religions and cultures have an "ark" story/mythological event. However, the OT provides the corrective narrative and historical documentation of that event. Just because the OT documents the event does not demand that embedding pagan mythology in order to communicate something about the "God of Israel." That Dr. Walton academic accomplishments deserve respect is recognized; nevertheless, one can appreciate his scholarship and still reject some of his conclusions.
I tend to avoid Bibles that have pastoral commentaries inside of them. No matter how good the pastor is it often seemed to me to smack of some real pride to your own thoughts inside the very Bible. I see this as different from text critical notes or small comments on items but the Dr. So and So NIV commentary was always a bit braggadocios for me.
I'm sorry that I some how missed your comment. But I pretty much agree with you concerning "study" Bibles. Some of them contain outright inaccuracies and/or uncritical notes. Most I know of don't even provide the author(s) of these "commentary notes." Don't get me wrong, some are helpful, but I still would like to know who wrote them. It would not surprise me to learn that some were written simply be friends of some editor(s), and that they were simply plagiarized from other sources. Who really knows where they come from.
Thanks Dr. Shanks
Glad that you found it helpful, thanks for watching.
Yeah i notice that, i check the background (author & content inside) - sometimes i didn't check well, i choose the best, deep & 2nd hand cheap. Thanks for the info
Glad that you found it beneficial! I always try get used commentaries first.
Johnathan Sarfati has a commentary book on Genesis. There are a lot of prophecies in the OT about a day of judgement that happened in Maccabees, and also about the day of judgement 70 AD.
Thanks for watching, hope you found it helpful.
This is such an excellent channel. I've been watching religious content on youtube for years and they finally recommended this channel.
So glad you found it helpful. The pandemic has made it difficult to post more videos, but hopefully that will change in a couple of months.
Hi Dr. Shanks, would you possibly do a TH-cam video on some of the commentaries that you would recommend? I have been researching all of these: (NIV application set, NICOT/NICNT set, Believers Bible commentary, word biblical commentary set, The Bible Knowledge commentary OT & NT, Baker Exegetical set, The New American commentary, & the IVP Bible Background OT & NT commentary to name a few). Just wanting some direction on ones out of these that you may recommend for the layperson? I have read the entire Bible, but want to dive deeper in my studies of course, but will be brand new to using commentaries. Thank you and God Bless!
That is a possibility, I will have to mull that one over. Is there a particular book in the Bible that you are thinking about getting a commentary for your studies?
@@askabibleprof7099I wanted to try to get a large commentary set where there is a volume for every book of the Bible (maybe like NICOT/NICNT), along with maybe a two volume commentary (maybe like the Bible knowledge set.) As far as books of the Bible, I do want to dive deeper in to Revelation and 1&2 Corinthians. I tend to lean more to the continuationism side than cessationism, but would like to go more in depth with studies on both views. When looking at authors/scholars of commentaries, I am unsure of who I should probably look more into on the study of continuationism.
Here's a list:
_The Jewish Annotated New Testament_ by Amy-Jill Levine (Editor), Marc Zvi Brettler (Editor)
_The Jewish Study Bible:_ Second Edition by Adele Berlin (Editor), Marc Zvi Brettler (Editor)
_The Jewish Annotated Apocrypha_ by Jonathan Klawans (Editor), Lawrence M. Wills (Editor)
_The New Oxford Annotated Bible with Apocrypha:_ Fifth Edition: New Revised Standard Version: by Michael Coogan (Editor), Marc Brettler (Editor), Carol Newsom (Editor), Pheme Perkins (Editor)
_HarperCollins Study Bible:_ Fully Revised & Updated by Harold W. Attridge (Author), Society of Biblical Literature (Author)
_The SBL Study Bible_ Hardcover - November 21, 2023
by Society of Biblical Literature (Author)
A thoroughly revised edition of The HarperCollins Study Bible
_Fortress Commentary on the Bible: Two Volume Set_ Kindle Edition
by Gale A. Yee (Author), Matthew J. M. Coomber (Editor), Margaret Aymer (Editor
@@gmac6503 Great, you provided a bibliography, but what does that prove? Anyone can do the same and they don't have to have a substantive position on any particular issue or an original thought of your own. It's kind of boring to be truthful.
@@askabibleprof7099 i have Mr. fake professor. provided a couple of sources so they can learn on their own, and you never do respond to points I do make so I really don't care how you want to have your followers just follow you. You're unlearned, sir.
Hey prof. What do you think of Barnes notes, John gill and Adam Clarke commentaries? May the LORD bless you.
I don't have any of the commentaries you have mentioned. So my ability to comment of them is very limited. What I do know is that they are very dated. That's not to say they don't have value or any good insights. Nevertheless, I personally try to use more current commentaries. I do this simply because so much has been learned and discovered since the late 18th century. So if you have any of these, then good, but I would start to incrementally supplement your library with more current commentaries. Hope that helps.
He's a FAKE bible prof. He does not even have a library lol. I have all 3 you mentioned. Gill is a hyper cal and Spurgeon admits that while Clarke is your Arminian defender and his opinion on the serpent is amusing while Barnes is hard to find I think but ok. You have to remember they are all outdated though. The prof here has no idea who they are. lol
I bit the bullet and bought Logos 8 Bible software. Logos 8 is pricey but worth it if you can swing it. I can pick and chose which commentaries I want, buy particular commentary series, and make inter-commentator comparisons at deep discounts to print copies. Logos 8 has been a total game-changer to my biblical studies...I'll never go back to print copies. Yes, there is an extensive array of lousy commentaries about forwarding liberal, progressive, and just plain heretical pseudo-doctrines angling for a popular audience. I tend to compare different expositors to piece together what makes expositional, theological, contextual, and systematic sense on passages. I like Moo, Block, Bruce, Walvoord, Zuck, and a couple others. The only "evangelical preacher" commentary series I'd heartily recommend is John MacArthur's...but the cost here is upward of $600.00 (buy a book or two at a time and grow your library). MacArthur is also worth it you're a died-in-the wool Calvinist-leaning type (like me). Your advice here is fantastic for serious Bible students...particularly your admonition about commentaries offering "exegetical comments" that range from simply incorrect to off-the-rails bizarre.
James; right, electronic commentaries can be found at a considerable savings. The problem for me is that as you know, I'm at a computer looking at a screen all the time. Consequently, I prefer hard print because it gives my eyes a break, and I can read them even if there is a power outage. Some times I just need to get away from my desk.
Great vid.
I'm considering buying some biblical books (including bibles) , and glad I came accross your channel. You've made some great points in this video.
Thx for posting.
Glad you found it helpful, thanks for watching and happy new year.
The Historical David: The Real Life of an Invented Hero Kindle Edition
by Joel Baden is only $1.99 on kindle. He is a true scholar and professor.
Interesting, can you be more specific? Is it your assertion that Kind David never existed, or that the biblical record regarding him is an invention? Can you be more precise?
@@askabibleprof7099 why don't you buy the book since it's only $1.99 and read it for yourself. He is a scholar and I know you don't like them but why don't you read it and give us what you think. OK clown. The guy has never heard of Joe Baden or John Collins, who has the best commentary on Daniel. Oh wait, they're from Yale so he's not gonna bother tell me something why don't you tell me what you think about king David that ain't gonna happen he never responds to questions.
@@askabibleprof7099 he asked me if I could be more specific, but I didn't give a commentary on the commentary I mentioned. I didn't give an opinion at all. This clown can't have a conversation with anybody who he knows can derail him in seconds. It's like the dude who claims that he could beat up Mike Tyson and yet never went to the gym to challenge him. This guy is a joke buy the book
@@askabibleprof7099 let me know when you want to buy the book. I'll even buy it for you. Deal with that.
@@askabibleprof7099 instead of promoting this excellent book, this so-called professor just wants to derail the whole conversation. What a clown.
Yeah, stay with your own people who agree with you. Ya know the believers who you agree with. Not a good practice, folks.
I recommend Joel S Baden and David M Carr on Genesis.
There are many others but here are two that will keep you busy.
Once again, I have to apologize for this late reply. I'm not sure why YT doesn't place them were I can find them. But once again, you are simply appealing to someone else's authority. Is there a specific point in the video that you wish to challenge? Lastly, I never suggest that my students "not" read positions that they disagree with, but only that they also read scholars that provide arguments from the biblical text revealing why some positions are poorly defended and contrary to the evidence.
@@askabibleprof7099 once again, he just doesn't respond to the point. Anyway, read the scholars. He has a problem with that and he doesn't want his followers to read scholars because that's appealing to authority. What a joke.
@@askabibleprof7099 he has no idea who are the names I mentioned are. I would be so embarrassed if I were he. He doesn't even acknowledge that. He knows the names. Lol that's why when I respond to his videos I deal in the third person. It's for people that really want to study the Bible, and he's not one of them
@@askabibleprof7099 they got the point. They know who the scholars are. You don't. I already know this. It's funny when the so-called Bible professor doesn't want sources named who are the best scholars in the field, but we know how you apologists are. You're making a fool out of yourself not even recognizing names. Keep up the good work.
@@gmac6503 I'm not sure others get anything, you simply promote scholars that you agree with, you never make any kind of substantive assertion of your own from any particular text. You stand on the shoulders of others, you never make an original observation of your own. How it that a defensible position?
I love Dr. Michael Heiser (RIP), OT scholar & author of 𝒰𝓃𝓈𝑒𝑒𝓃 𝑅𝑒𝒶𝓁𝓂. I also love my Tony Evans Bible commentary.
Glad to hear that you benefited. Any commentary that provides you with greater insight into the truth and trustworthiness of scriptures while also strengthening your faith in them and the Lord is a very good commentary. Blessings.
So if I get a doctorate of ministry. I become a demon?
Hmmm, not sure how you arrived at that conclusion from this video. It doesn't suggest that DMins have no purpose or value.
@@askabibleprof7099 Sorry, I didn't know that was the spelling of it. Cursed youtube subtitles. Good content, definitely something to ponder on my next purchase
@@DellBlackberry22 Yeah, it's a bummer when the technology gremlins get you, lol. Thanks for watching, merry Christmas.
@@askabibleprof7099 Thanks. You too.
Hi, would you possibly do a TH-cam video on some of the commentaries that you would recommend? I have been researching all of these: (NIV application set, NICOT/NICNT set, Believers Bible commentary, word biblical commentary set, The Bible Knowledge commentary OT & NT, Baker Exegetical set, The New American commentary, & the IVP Bible Background OT & NT commentary to name a few). Just wanting some direction on ones out of these that you may recommend for the layperson? I have read the entire Bible, but want to dive deeper in my studies of course, but will be brand new to using commentaries. Thank you and God Bless!
Dr.Shanks, you have discussed well and laid down the key points.
Would you also recommend some good Commentaries from an Evangelical and Scholarly point of view. Thanks so much for the good discourse !
Actually, I will be doing some videos on these types of questions in the future. The next will probably focus on how to determine which commentary is best for the individual. I suspect that one will be available in about a month, right now I am in a heavy grading period, so my time is very limited. I am also currently doing the script for how to write a biblical research paper, but that will be more than a month out. Thanks for asking.
Dr?? yeah like James White. lol Dr lol
Why not read scholars? Evangelical and Scholarly do not go together normally. Here's a list
_The Jewish Annotated New Testament_ by Amy-Jill Levine (Editor), Marc Zvi Brettler (Editor)
_The Jewish Study Bible:_ Second Edition by Adele Berlin (Editor), Marc Zvi Brettler (Editor)
_The Jewish Annotated Apocrypha_ by Jonathan Klawans (Editor), Lawrence M. Wills (Editor)
_The New Oxford Annotated Bible with Apocrypha:_ Fifth Edition: New Revised Standard Version: by Michael Coogan (Editor), Marc Brettler (Editor), Carol Newsom (Editor), Pheme Perkins (Editor)
_HarperCollins Study Bible:_ Fully Revised & Updated by Harold W. Attridge (Author), Society of Biblical Literature (Author)
_The SBL Study Bible_ Hardcover - November 21, 2023
by Society of Biblical Literature (Author)
A thoroughly revised edition of The HarperCollins Study Bible
_Fortress Commentary on the Bible: Two Volume Set_ Kindle Edition
by Gale A. Yee (Author), Matthew J. M. Coomber (Editor), Margaret Aymer (Editor
The commentary that recognizes the book of Genesis and other "history" books of the Old Testament are myths and that many of the stories in these books are based on mythologies from the ancient Near East is a good scholar. I would gladly buy that scholar's commentary.
Recommended Reading:
"Ancient Near Eastern Thought & the Old Testament" by John H. Walton
I appreciate the interaction, but regrettably I must disagree with Dr Walton. Many of his conclusions, assumptions, not to mention aspects of his methodology contains catastrophic flaws. Please consider the interviews with Dr. Oswalt on this channel, maybe start with this one: th-cam.com/video/iiSE778y288/w-d-xo.html.
@@askabibleprof7099 "Catastrophic flaws"? Dr Walton is a highly respected Old Testament scholar and doesn't make any "conclusions" or "assumptions" in that book. If you've read it, you'll recall that he stated in the introduction that he's not trying to convince you that the Old Testament is based on myths, but is just laying out the facts and letting you decide for yourself. No assumptions, no conclusions.
EDIT: I'll refute the video you recommended either tomorrow or this weekend.
@@txfreethinker Again, thanks for watching. That may be what Dr. Walton implies in his book, but he has gone on record, stating that the OT contains pagan mythology. He's embraced the same flawed biases and presuppositions of modern secular and liberal scholars who have failed to understand (or maybe respect is a better concept) the corrective nature of the OT. For example, many ancient pagan religions and cultures have an "ark" story/mythological event. However, the OT provides the corrective narrative and historical documentation of that event. Just because the OT documents the event does not demand that embedding pagan mythology in order to communicate something about the "God of Israel." That Dr. Walton academic accomplishments deserve respect is recognized; nevertheless, one can appreciate his scholarship and still reject some of his conclusions.
I tend to avoid Bibles that have pastoral commentaries inside of them. No matter how good the pastor is it often seemed to me to smack of some real pride to your own thoughts inside the very Bible. I see this as different from text critical notes or small comments on items but the Dr. So and So NIV commentary was always a bit braggadocios for me.
I'm sorry that I some how missed your comment. But I pretty much agree with you concerning "study" Bibles. Some of them contain outright inaccuracies and/or uncritical notes. Most I know of don't even provide the author(s) of these "commentary notes." Don't get me wrong, some are helpful, but I still would like to know who wrote them. It would not surprise me to learn that some were written simply be friends of some editor(s), and that they were simply plagiarized from other sources. Who really knows where they come from.