Ms Kang may be a journalist, but she is not an interviewer. Ms Sedaris and Ms Everett are so intelligent and naturally humorous and this interview was saved by them.
I love these 2 women but the interviewer's vocal fry made this unbearable to listen to. Letting these 2 women interview each other would have been the way to go.
Inkoo's Valley Girl upspeak ruins this. So annoying when you are really interested in the interviewees but the moderator makes it unbearable to listen to.
These two are hilarious and I agree that this was the wrong interviewer. I think her job as a tv critic insulates her and makes her take herself too seriously.
Needed an experienced interviewer to keep up with these two. Inkoo's default was "as you've gotten older"...wanted to mute, but Amy and Bridget STARRED in spite of interviewer awkwardness and rudeness
It takes a special talent to make an interview with these talented and creative people boring. I did enjoy that They found ways to make fun of her to her face. 12:53
Interviewing 2 Guests, 2 Friends, together was a BRILLIANT Idea.The Energy, Joy, and Play between the 2 of them (with interviewer prompts) was OUTSTANDING. Lovely, Talented, CREATIVE, & DETERMINED individuals, both. MUCH enjoyed! 🌹🌹🌹
I’m trying to be understanding, but Kang comes off as being out of her depth or unprepared. Her questioning style, her “Bay Area” affect, the ding dongs of it all, I’m not sure why she was chosen for this interview. Bridget and Amy were very gracious with her.
That interviewer was so bad at this that it came off as disrespectful. Completely out of her depth. Did they not think about having her practice in a less important venue? Or find someone who wasn't completely unable to host an event?
I don’t think that’s sad. There’s a certain smell that I come across once in a while that I can only describe as pink plastic and it transports me to my childhood.
Love the guests💛💛 but they really didn't need an interviewer😂
Ms Kang may be a journalist, but she is not an interviewer. Ms Sedaris and Ms Everett are so intelligent and naturally humorous and this interview was saved by them.
it’s painful- I don’t think I can make it
Agreed
I love these 2 women but the interviewer's vocal fry made this unbearable to listen to. Letting these 2 women interview each other would have been the way to go.
I knew the comments would eat the commentator alive .. but, These two LADIES ARE HYSTERICAL AND GENUINE AND Thankyou for this , New Yorker!
I wish the facilitator had more energy and it was better prepared. Needs to be more fast-paced and energetic with between two comedians.
5 minutes in and I'm all Kanged out! Byeeee!
you lasted longer than I did and I love Amy sedaris so much.
Inkoo's Valley Girl upspeak ruins this. So annoying when you are really interested in the interviewees but the moderator makes it unbearable to listen to.
Agreed. This moderator did zero favors for these two hilarious creatives.
Gawd!! I thought it was just me😱😳 I can't even finish the vid & these are 2 of my favorite women. It's insufferable.
First thing out of interviewers mouth is an INSULT! WTF 😢
These two are hilarious and I agree that this was the wrong interviewer. I think her job as a tv critic insulates her and makes her take herself too seriously.
There’s some kind of paradox with having such an interviewer with so little chemistry
Needed an experienced interviewer to keep up with these two. Inkoo's default was "as you've gotten older"...wanted to mute, but Amy and Bridget STARRED in spite of interviewer awkwardness and rudeness
Better moderator needed. Upspeak valley girl blah blah come on
It takes a special talent to make an interview with these talented and creative people boring. I did enjoy that They found ways to make fun of her to her face. 12:53
What is going on with kang?
What do you mean?
Interviewing 2 Guests, 2 Friends, together was a BRILLIANT Idea.The Energy, Joy, and Play between the 2 of them (with interviewer prompts) was OUTSTANDING.
Lovely, Talented, CREATIVE, & DETERMINED individuals, both. MUCH enjoyed! 🌹🌹🌹
Thank you New Yorker! ❤ Love Amy, say hi to David.
Took 8 minutes before a question was even asked....
I’m trying to be understanding, but Kang comes off as being out of her depth or unprepared. Her questioning style, her “Bay Area” affect, the ding dongs of it all, I’m not sure why she was chosen for this interview. Bridget and Amy were very gracious with her.
Amazing transformation- you have such talent ❤
That interviewer was so bad at this that it came off as disrespectful. Completely out of her depth. Did they not think about having her practice in a less important venue? Or find someone who wasn't completely unable to host an event?
"I have to say this: thank you for being here." Are you not thankful that they are there? What is wrong with this lady?
Why the interviewer thinks there’re the Star.
Can we please give Amy a box to rest her feet on? This happens to me all the time with chairs. It’s uncomfortable after a while.
Pretty sure she can speak for herself. If she wanted a box, she’d ask for one.
Longest introduction ever.
Adore this. Lower chairs or foot support anyone?
LOVE LOVE LOVE
6:07 Amy's face is all of us. This interviewer is horrible.
I love rabbits too Amy. A 74 years young guy and l agree they are cute and cuddly. The fur reminds me of a woman’s skin. Sad or what?
I don’t think that’s sad. There’s a certain smell that I come across once in a while that I can only describe as pink plastic and it transports me to my childhood.
⚓️ Thanks TNYer 🌈
I want to be a whole people!
Love both of them, but yawn.
🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁
🎉😂❤
Cokl