For anyone interested in the Podcast he mentioned, The Fighter Pilot Podcast, here is some more info I wrote in reply to another comment if any one else is interested! The back catalog has interviews with a pilot of every modern and many past fighters (all Gen 4/5 and some gen 2/3). The first 36 episodes are not aircraft specific, just flying and related stuff (AA, different mission types, training, etc.). Here are some of the aircraft specific episodes I’ve enjoyed: Ep. 37 the f-18, Ep.42 the Tomcat, Ep.45 the F-16, Ep. 68 the JAS39 Gripen, Ep. 111 the f-111, and Ep.61 the F-22. They also have a lot of interviews about bombers (Ep. 67 the B-2, ep.72 the f117 and ep. 97 Avro Vulcan) jump out at me in particular as being a really good bomber episodes. Enjoy!
Great stuff. Not a DCS player, not much time for gaming these days. But man, this reminds me of playing Falcon 4 twenty years ago. For all its bugginess, I’m reminded of just how ahead of its time it was. Flew many co op missions exactly like this with a mate who was just as into it. I’m also reminded of just how incredible and immersive the dynamic campaign mode was. Many times over the years I have reminisced and wondered if there would be a game that recreated that. Now I’m just happy to watch you and Growling Sidewinder vids on DSC, with a particular nostalgia for the viper. Fly Safe!
20+ years ago, I was a SHF Comms tech at Misawa AB, home to a Wild Weasel Squadron, which actually changed designations from the 442nd to the 35th while I served there. Good times!
Dan Hampton, author of "Viper Pilot" who specialized in Wild Weasels made exactly the same points. The really great weapon for Weasels are sensor-fused munitions that seek heat, metal and noise, but the CBUs and Mavricks with Hi-Rez tv are pretty awesome.
Hey guys. My store: www.longshotstore.com/ Join me on Discord: discord.gg/drNE6bT In this DCS World (Digital Combat Simulaor) video im flying the f 16 viper with @Growling Sidewinder . We are doing a Wild Weasel mission inspired by episode 113 of the @The Fighter Pilot Podcast Link to the episode: th-cam.com/video/2EI2rYxMPHM/w-d-xo.html Hope you guys enjoy!
If I was you're wingman, I would immediately start sweating if you started the mission plan with "So about this podcast I watched last night" Great video!
Great video as usual. I figured I would weigh in on the differences between Marine air wing and the Air Force missions. DEAD is based off of the idea of DAS (deep air strikes) which is what the Air Force primarily focuses on doctrine wise (not saying the Air Force does not conduct CAS because they certainly do). SEAD is an infantry centric tactic based off of CAS (close air support) SEAD is conducted to give troops on the ground needed air support while protecting assets (the aircraft) in order for the guys on the ground to continue their mission with a higher survivability rate. SEAD missions have a couple different ways of deconfliction as well TOT or altitude. This is the primary purpose of at least the Marine Corps air wing.
you two make it look so easy !even though you're training, it was so on point. impressive. i'm just getting in and even if i flew on almost every MS flight sims, il2 GB and some other older sims, i struggle with even the most basic things in dcs😅
This easily ties in with that Super Hornet mission you 2 fine gentlemen did a while back as my favorite videos you've done so far bro, i love it! Also reminds me of a scene from the book Red Storm Rising where some Hornets attack Soviet targets and then have to go air-to-air with Fulcrums.. Hell yeah!! 👌👌
Well done video and great teamwork between you and GS. That first flyby when the radar was still up and at least one missile carrier still operational had me saying to the screen, "Oh, I don't know about that." LOL
AKA Total ass kicking by LS and GS on the enemy. Well done Gentleman. Well done. If the USAF decides to use remote pilots like you, hell is going to pay when you fly your missions.
Dan Hampton would have never took off with 6 Mavs on his Viper because he also loves staying alive when flying home XD. The innermost mavs would blow off your stabilators, the possibility of carrying 3 on each stations was only intended in case the Soviets invade Europe with thousands of tanks and you needed to take out as many of them as possible, regardless the aircrafts would go down after attacking. Great video guys, always a delight to watch ;)
Yeah that episode of Fighter pilot podcast was pretty interesting .... I recommend Dan Hampton's book "Viper Pilot". I've got it and it was pretty interesting reading :) ... and BTW great video enjoyed it :)
Longshot that was like shining yo shoes... Love 💕 that skating the earth surface sh.t...felt like I was flying with my phone... exciting...when I grow up,I hope to fly with youse guys...I'm 63...as always,keep up the good fight.Don't think I haven't detected your pronounced accent...I will thru the power of deduction at one point narrow your ethnicity down...fly on bro.
DEAD is SEAD's slightly older (DEAD came before SEAD, before DEAD/SEAD were really given a name) twin that has a complex. As soon as you mention SEAD, everyone starts jumping up and down trying to correct you by saying "You mean DEAD". Well it depends on the mission. If the intent is to simply get the site to not fire/stop firing before a strike package flies over - that's more a SEAD function. If the intent is to kinetically effect the site and it's equipment, that's DEAD. In DCS, due to a lack of true EW/EA capabilities, the missions almost always rely on you destroying either part or all of the site. The two concepts really go hand in hand, to be fair. You can suppress an AA threat by firing large volumes of HARMs, or by having actual aircraft push the target (aka Wild Weasel), or by firing guided munitions intended to destroy part or all of a AA site. In SEAD the main objective is to overwhelm the site to the point it either shuts down so it can't fire (typically done via Electronic Warfare/Attack means, but lobbing HARMs its way also works) and is no longer effective or is damaged/destroyed to the point it can no longer function (such as taking out a search and/or tracking radar for sites such as SA-2/3/6). The risk, in reality, with SEAD is that if a critical piece of the fire control system is only damaged, it could be repaired and later cause issues. In DEAD the objective is, obviously, the site's complete destruction - because a site can't work if the materiel is on fire and in several pieces. Destroying the launchers is arguably better, but (in reality) the morale hit when a SAM battery runs out of missiles (because Wild Weasel has made them waste all their munitions) or their search and track (target acquisition technically, but I always refer to it as a 'tracking radar')/search radar is taken out, enabling strike packages to simply bypass or ignore them is an arguably equal effect. Plus it means they need to be resupplied, which opens up interdiction options and can lead to the discovery of strategic ammunition storage depots. Both have their place and merits but one is not essentially more "correct" than the other.
Firing for suppression is usually less risky than firing for effect if it allows you to achieve some sort of greater objective. You'd have to be one steely-eyed missile man to stay at your station as those F-16's come around for another pass, or more afraid of taking one in the back from your CO for cowardice as you dove for the nearest ditch or foxhole. (Still a more inviting exit strategy than punching out over hostile territory) The DCS player has the advantage of a near-God-like omniscience of the threats he faces. If those SAMs had their usual IRL company of ZSUses and Strellas, spamming them with HARMs at range would have been safer than the low, slow, multi-pass.
Glad someone else used the fighter pilot podcast for inspiration for a mission. Have some criticisms that I wanted to put out there. Hopefully at least one of these can help you make better videos. I don’t know how close to the podcast you were going for, but it was such a cool episode, I wanted to get as close as possible to what those guys were doing. SAM system choice: SA-11 wasn’t used by Iraq. Thankfully for the US. SA3 would be way more fitting. Also putting AAA nearby the SAM system or possible IR sites like SA-9 would have been a nice touch. Load out choice: thought it would have been more fitting not to use HARMs, since they were considered a waste of a wing station. Triple Mavericks wouldn’t be used. Realism aside for DEAD you want to be fast. Guess you kinda needed all 6 for that 11, but that brings me back to point 1.
Two Dogs is referring to using a HARM as a way to destroy a target radar. He knows very little about Electronic Warfare. That doesn’t take anything away from his skill as a fighter pilot. He thinks from the viewpoint of blowing shit up. Electronic Warfare is about keeping his alive so that he can blow shit up. The HARM is just one of the tools EW uses and it does it very well.
It’s very good, the back catalog has interviews with a pilot of every modern and many past fighters. The first 36 episodes are not aircraft specific, just flying and related stuff (AA, different mission types, training, etc.). Here are some of the aircraft specific episodes I’ve enjoyed: Ep. 37 the f-18, Ep.42 the Tomcat, Ep.45 the F-16, Ep. 68 the JAS39 Gripen, Ep. 111 the f-111, and Ep.61 the F-22. They also have a lot of interviews about bombers (Ep. 67 the B-2, ep.72 the f117 and ep. 97 Avro Vulcan) jump out at me in particular as being a really good bomber episodes. Enjoy!
I may be wrong, but I remember to have read in F-16.net, that the F-16 is cleared to carry two AGM-65 missiles on each triple racks on stations 3 and 7. Missiles on innermost racks may inflict damage on horizontal stabilizers when fired.
Not to disparage your wild weasel pilot but the harm has two settings "home on radar" and "homes on last known gps" unless the radar is mobile and gets out of the area its toast or disabled. The Navy on your SA 11 mission would use a A6E to jam or in my time a Spark-Vark version of the F111. Suppression of Air Defense or SEAD covers anything from electronic jamming to destruction of units posing threats to Naval or Combined Arms units whether US or Allies. Great examples are the First Gulf War DS/DS.
Great VID!!!!!, I find dcs a bit cheat in comparison to what they had to do, here we can easily enter gps of waypoint and tpod to it, im sure they did not have that. It is much worse to identify location of threat target it while being defending, hats off. Also in dcs we dont have jhmcs in its full glory to make this easy. I like how you used mav instead of tpod slave which fails me always handoff never works :D again awesome video, will defo use this tactics against not only 11's but will try against 300's, probably need a two flight two ship.
When I heard you talking about a Wild Weasel in the podcast you were listeneing to, te first thing that came to mind was Dan "Two Dogs" Hampton. If you haven't read his book Viper Pilot then please do. I've read it three times already.
That was fantastic. What about the landing, parking, and shutdown though? Maybe I'm just a stickler for the details. Still, this is great. I'm subscribed.
Only thing I would have done differently is using gun on that radar, saving the Maverick for the launcher. As long as that long range radar is out of the picture, the SA-11s operating/area denial range is significantly reduced. But I'd also argue that 9 times out of 10, an SA-11 site is likely going to have either a short range SAM system (such as SA-8/SA-15) or a AAA system (such as a ZSU or SA-19, perhaps even MANPADs) defending it from what you were able to do (i.e. get within its minimum range and operate with impunity).
480thTFS Spangdahlem AB FRG (SEAD and Weasels) 335thTFS "Chiefs" Seymour Johnson AFB NC (Hunter Killer Weasels...) "worlds Largest Distributor of Mig Parts". Good times.
Using the long zoom of the tgp could have helped you ID the launchers far enough away to get off at least 4 Mavs at 4 launchers. Otherwise, pretty cool mission!
Need to do this with a proper SAM sight setup. There was no close air cover... No short range SAMs or AAA. Sites like that would have a Tunguska or two, at least a MANPAD.
There was an incident in Iraq where a Iraqi Roland had been attacked with multiple HARM's and continued to operate. It was finally taken out by 2 Hornets and a 1000lb bomb
So LS, was the Weasel guy you heard interviewed Dan "Two Dogs" Harmon? Sounds like him. He wrote an awesome book called "Viper Pilot", in which he describes an amazing career, and totally shits on the HARM. What was the name of the podcast?
It was him, they talk about the book in the podcast as well. There is a link in the pined comment & in the video description. The episode name is wild weasel, 113
Any mission briefing which starts with something like "So I was watching this podcast..." is a good briefing.
Lol thanks buddy
Next tutorial „how to WATCH a podcast“ 😊
The chatter gets better and better. The voice filter, the tactics. You guys are an awesome flight!
Appreciate it, glad you enjoyed, thank you very much
For anyone interested in the Podcast he mentioned, The Fighter Pilot Podcast, here is some more info I wrote in reply to another comment if any one else is interested!
The back catalog has interviews with a pilot of every modern and many past fighters (all Gen 4/5 and some gen 2/3). The first 36 episodes are not aircraft specific, just flying and related stuff (AA, different mission types, training, etc.). Here are some of the aircraft specific episodes I’ve enjoyed: Ep. 37 the f-18, Ep.42 the Tomcat, Ep.45 the F-16, Ep. 68 the JAS39 Gripen, Ep. 111 the f-111, and Ep.61 the F-22. They also have a lot of interviews about bombers (Ep. 67 the B-2, ep.72 the f117 and ep. 97 Avro Vulcan) jump out at me in particular as being a really good bomber episodes. Enjoy!
Great stuff. Not a DCS player, not much time for gaming these days. But man, this reminds me of playing Falcon 4 twenty years ago. For all its bugginess, I’m reminded of just how ahead of its time it was. Flew many co op missions exactly like this with a mate who was just as into it. I’m also reminded of just how incredible and immersive the dynamic campaign mode was. Many times over the years I have reminisced and wondered if there would be a game that recreated that. Now I’m just happy to watch you and Growling Sidewinder vids on DSC, with a particular nostalgia for the viper. Fly Safe!
Thanks, i appreciate the support and im glad i can be a part of your expirience.
20+ years ago, I was a SHF Comms tech at Misawa AB, home to a Wild Weasel Squadron, which actually changed designations from the 442nd to the 35th while I served there. Good times!
I listened to that episode of the Fighter Pilot Podcast. Two Dogs had me chuckling when he and Jell-O talked about the HARM.
Yeah, he sounds like an awesome dude
Have you read his book Viper Pilot? If not it’s a MUST read for us virtual Pilots. The audiobook has an awesome narrator.
Ill check it out, thanks
I know I'm 15, but have you read Two Dogs' book Viper Pilot? It's an amazing memoir about his time served in Iraq as a Wild Weasel
@@ace.texaco6774 I know I’m 35, but I read and reread that book while learning the Viper in BMS Falcon
Dan Hampton, author of "Viper Pilot" who specialized in Wild Weasels made exactly the same points. The really great weapon for Weasels are sensor-fused munitions that seek heat, metal and noise, but the CBUs and Mavricks with Hi-Rez tv are pretty awesome.
Add a couple ZSU-23's near the SAM sites. Little more sporting when flying that close.
Im training, taking it one step at a time
Right? I was thinking one Tunguska on site would have wrecked house.
hey longshot,awesome work!
i came by GS recommendation,stayed for the quality.
awesome the voice filter,the joker joke....and everything!
Glad you liked it. Thanks for the support
Woo buddy! Great opening. Easily one of the best flight operations simulations i have seen. Truly a very enjoyable video to watch.
Its very nice of you, awesome to hear.
Appreciate it, thank you!
Hey guys.
My store: www.longshotstore.com/
Join me on Discord: discord.gg/drNE6bT
In this DCS World (Digital Combat Simulaor) video im flying the f 16 viper with @Growling Sidewinder . We are doing a Wild Weasel mission inspired by episode 113 of the @The Fighter Pilot Podcast
Link to the episode: th-cam.com/video/2EI2rYxMPHM/w-d-xo.html
Hope you guys enjoy!
For some reason that link doesn't work for me, here's another th-cam.com/video/2EI2rYxMPHM/w-d-xo.html
Pilot: The AGM-88 is useless.
B-52 58-0248: *Agreed!*
If I was you're wingman, I would immediately start sweating if you started the mission plan with "So about this podcast I watched last night"
Great video!
Thank you man
Cool mission. The F-16 is a beast: 500 + knots with all that stores. Amazing. Dan Hampton would be proud.
This was probably one of the coolest videos I've watched for DCS Longshot or growling
Thank you buddy
Great video as usual. I figured I would weigh in on the differences between Marine air wing and the Air Force missions. DEAD is based off of the idea of DAS (deep air strikes) which is what the Air Force primarily focuses on doctrine wise (not saying the Air Force does not conduct CAS because they certainly do). SEAD is an infantry centric tactic based off of CAS (close air support) SEAD is conducted to give troops on the ground needed air support while protecting assets (the aircraft) in order for the guys on the ground to continue their mission with a higher survivability rate. SEAD missions have a couple different ways of deconfliction as well TOT or altitude. This is the primary purpose of at least the Marine Corps air wing.
Thanks man, and good to know👍
SEAD can also lead into DEAD
you two make it look so easy !even though you're training, it was so on point.
impressive.
i'm just getting in and even if i flew on almost every MS flight sims, il2 GB and some other older sims, i struggle with even the most basic things in dcs😅
Glad you liked it, thank you for your support
This easily ties in with that Super Hornet mission you 2 fine gentlemen did a while back as my favorite videos you've done so far bro, i love it! Also reminds me of a scene from the book Red Storm Rising where some Hornets attack Soviet targets and then have to go air-to-air with Fulcrums.. Hell yeah!! 👌👌
Thank you very much, im realy happy you liked those videos. Appreciate the support
Well done video and great teamwork between you and GS. That first flyby when the radar was still up and at least one missile carrier still operational had me saying to the screen, "Oh, I don't know about that." LOL
Thank you very much.
Pretty cool tactics taking that site out!
@7:14 [was that a "wingsuit" view? Lol...nice work!
Thank you sir, appreciate it and glad you liked it
You're getting super good at this mate!
Appreciate it man, cheers
AKA Total ass kicking by LS and GS on the enemy. Well done Gentleman. Well done. If the USAF decides to use remote pilots like you, hell is going to pay when you fly your missions.
Cool! I'd always heard that no good DEAD goes unpunished. Thanks for proving them wrong! 😄
I listen to that podcast too! One of the best episode. Great video by the way!
Thank you
Dan Hampton would have never took off with 6 Mavs on his Viper because he also loves staying alive when flying home XD. The innermost mavs would blow off your stabilators, the possibility of carrying 3 on each stations was only intended in case the Soviets invade Europe with thousands of tanks and you needed to take out as many of them as possible, regardless the aircrafts would go down after attacking. Great video guys, always a delight to watch ;)
Yeah that episode of Fighter pilot podcast was pretty interesting .... I recommend Dan Hampton's book "Viper Pilot". I've got it and it was pretty interesting reading :) ... and BTW great video enjoyed it :)
Thank you. Ill check this book out. Im glad you enjoyed
I have another of his books, "Lords Of The Sky." It's also a decent read.
Hearts pounding...sweating like a Stuck Hog.... KNOCK EM DOWN!! Yee Haw!!!! I LOVE IT!!!!🐦...
I think this is my favorite DCS video :) you guys did a great job, really enjoyable to watch. Keep doing more of these!
Thanks!
Love these kind of videos! Keep up the great work! 👍
Love you and sidewinder as a team. Really fun mission too. I would love to see more like it.
Longshot that was like shining yo shoes... Love 💕 that skating the earth surface sh.t...felt like I was flying with my phone... exciting...when I grow up,I hope to fly with youse guys...I'm 63...as always,keep up the good fight.Don't think I haven't detected your pronounced accent...I will thru the power of deduction at one point narrow your ethnicity down...fly on bro.
This is interesting. I heard of SEAD before, but I never heard of DEAD before.
The acronym pretty much writes itself. Deader is better.
DEAD is SEAD's slightly older (DEAD came before SEAD, before DEAD/SEAD were really given a name) twin that has a complex. As soon as you mention SEAD, everyone starts jumping up and down trying to correct you by saying "You mean DEAD". Well it depends on the mission. If the intent is to simply get the site to not fire/stop firing before a strike package flies over - that's more a SEAD function. If the intent is to kinetically effect the site and it's equipment, that's DEAD. In DCS, due to a lack of true EW/EA capabilities, the missions almost always rely on you destroying either part or all of the site.
The two concepts really go hand in hand, to be fair. You can suppress an AA threat by firing large volumes of HARMs, or by having actual aircraft push the target (aka Wild Weasel), or by firing guided munitions intended to destroy part or all of a AA site. In SEAD the main objective is to overwhelm the site to the point it either shuts down so it can't fire (typically done via Electronic Warfare/Attack means, but lobbing HARMs its way also works) and is no longer effective or is damaged/destroyed to the point it can no longer function (such as taking out a search and/or tracking radar for sites such as SA-2/3/6). The risk, in reality, with SEAD is that if a critical piece of the fire control system is only damaged, it could be repaired and later cause issues. In DEAD the objective is, obviously, the site's complete destruction - because a site can't work if the materiel is on fire and in several pieces.
Destroying the launchers is arguably better, but (in reality) the morale hit when a SAM battery runs out of missiles (because Wild Weasel has made them waste all their munitions) or their search and track (target acquisition technically, but I always refer to it as a 'tracking radar')/search radar is taken out, enabling strike packages to simply bypass or ignore them is an arguably equal effect. Plus it means they need to be resupplied, which opens up interdiction options and can lead to the discovery of strategic ammunition storage depots.
Both have their place and merits but one is not essentially more "correct" than the other.
😆👌
Coz you haven't heard the Fighter Pilot Podcast 😘
Firing for suppression is usually less risky than firing for effect if it allows you to achieve some sort of greater objective.
You'd have to be one steely-eyed missile man to stay at your station as those F-16's come around for another pass, or more afraid of taking one in the back from your CO for cowardice as you dove for the nearest ditch or foxhole. (Still a more inviting exit strategy than punching out over hostile territory) The DCS player has the advantage of a near-God-like omniscience of the threats he faces. If those SAMs had their usual IRL company of ZSUses and Strellas, spamming them with HARMs at range would have been safer than the low, slow, multi-pass.
Glad someone else used the fighter pilot podcast for inspiration for a mission. Have some criticisms that I wanted to put out there. Hopefully at least one of these can help you make better videos. I don’t know how close to the podcast you were going for, but it was such a cool episode, I wanted to get as close as possible to what those guys were doing.
SAM system choice: SA-11 wasn’t used by Iraq. Thankfully for the US. SA3 would be way more fitting.
Also putting AAA nearby the SAM system or possible IR sites like SA-9 would have been a nice touch.
Load out choice: thought it would have been more fitting not to use HARMs, since they were considered a waste of a wing station. Triple Mavericks wouldn’t be used. Realism aside for DEAD you want to be fast. Guess you kinda needed all 6 for that 11, but that brings me back to point 1.
Two Dogs is referring to using a HARM as a way to destroy a target radar. He knows very little about Electronic Warfare. That doesn’t take anything away from his skill as a fighter pilot. He thinks from the viewpoint of blowing shit up. Electronic Warfare is about keeping his alive so that he can blow shit up. The HARM is just one of the tools EW uses and it does it very well.
I have to start listening to that podcast immediately.
Highly recomended
It’s very good, the back catalog has interviews with a pilot of every modern and many past fighters. The first 36 episodes are not aircraft specific, just flying and related stuff (AA, different mission types, training, etc.). Here are some of the aircraft specific episodes I’ve enjoyed: Ep. 37 the f-18, Ep.42 the Tomcat, Ep.45 the F-16, Ep. 68 the JAS39 Gripen, Ep. 111 the f-111, and Ep.61 the F-22. They also have a lot of interviews about bombers (Ep. 67 the B-2, ep.72 the f117 and ep. 97 Avro Vulcan) jump out at me in particular as being a really good bomber episodes. Enjoy!
They're incredible, but they're all at least 1h long (at least the last episodes)
Came over from my boii GS. Glad to have found your channel and subbed
Awesome man, thanks
Amazing to see you guys refer to Fighter Pilot Podcast. GG guys ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Thanks man, glad you liked it
I may be wrong, but I remember to have read in F-16.net, that the F-16 is cleared to carry two AGM-65 missiles on each triple racks on stations 3 and 7. Missiles on innermost racks may inflict damage on horizontal stabilizers when fired.
Not to disparage your wild weasel pilot but the harm has two settings "home on radar" and "homes on last known gps" unless the radar is mobile and gets out of the area its toast or disabled. The Navy on your SA 11 mission would use a A6E to jam or in my time a Spark-Vark version of the F111. Suppression of Air Defense or SEAD covers anything from electronic jamming to destruction of units posing threats to Naval or Combined Arms units whether US or Allies. Great examples are the First Gulf War DS/DS.
Great VID!!!!!, I find dcs a bit cheat in comparison to what they had to do, here we can easily enter gps of waypoint and tpod to it, im sure they did not have that. It is much worse to identify location of threat target it while being defending, hats off. Also in dcs we dont have jhmcs in its full glory to make this easy. I like how you used mav instead of tpod slave which fails me always handoff never works :D again awesome video, will defo use this tactics against not only 11's but will try against 300's, probably need a two flight two ship.
Glad you enjoyed, its going to be my go to tactic as well. Thanks alot buddy
Thats was reaaally nice !
I'd love to see rafale vs su57
When I heard you talking about a Wild Weasel in the podcast you were listeneing to, te first thing that came to mind was Dan "Two Dogs" Hampton. If you haven't read his book Viper Pilot then please do. I've read it three times already.
It is my understanding the newer HARM's have a system where even if the radar turns off, it remembers where it is, making them much more effective.
They've been trying to do that since Vietnam. Results have been mixed.
Keep it up. What a great scenario. You're a great duet ^^
Thank you very much buddy
That was fantastic. What about the landing, parking, and shutdown though? Maybe I'm just a stickler for the details. Still, this is great. I'm subscribed.
Thank you
Only thing I would have done differently is using gun on that radar, saving the Maverick for the launcher. As long as that long range radar is out of the picture, the SA-11s operating/area denial range is significantly reduced.
But I'd also argue that 9 times out of 10, an SA-11 site is likely going to have either a short range SAM system (such as SA-8/SA-15) or a AAA system (such as a ZSU or SA-19, perhaps even MANPADs) defending it from what you were able to do (i.e. get within its minimum range and operate with impunity).
Agreed. But i am training, so.. one step at a time.
480thTFS Spangdahlem AB FRG (SEAD and Weasels) 335thTFS "Chiefs" Seymour Johnson AFB NC (Hunter Killer Weasels...) "worlds Largest Distributor of Mig Parts". Good times.
That was excellent guys really enjoyed that.
Thank you. Wait to see what i have for you today
My Uncle was in the 101st Airborne. Got to hang with the weasels For a little bit.
Great action !!!! Those Wild Weasels were no joke ..............
Yup, thank you
Now this looks like good fun! Wild weasel? Yes please!
You and GS make a Great Team.
Using the long zoom of the tgp could have helped you ID the launchers far enough away to get off at least 4 Mavs at 4 launchers. Otherwise, pretty cool mission!
Luckily those Syrians didn't have an old ZSU-23 hanging out by that SAM site.
Need to do this with a proper SAM sight setup. There was no close air cover... No short range SAMs or AAA. Sites like that would have a Tunguska or two, at least a MANPAD.
The Jokker was clutch.
There was an incident in Iraq where a Iraqi Roland had been attacked with multiple HARM's and continued to operate.
It was finally taken out by 2 Hornets and a 1000lb bomb
So LS, was the Weasel guy you heard interviewed Dan "Two Dogs" Harmon? Sounds like him. He wrote an awesome book called "Viper Pilot", in which he describes an amazing career, and totally shits on the HARM. What was the name of the podcast?
It was him, they talk about the book in the podcast as well.
There is a link in the pined comment & in the video description.
The episode name is wild weasel, 113
@@LongShotChannel Oh cool. thanks for that!
Two Dogs doesn’t know shit about Electronic Warfare and truly using the HARM.
Was not expecting a Joker reference XD.
Lol
@Longshot. You and Growling Sidewinder should try a DEAD mission against an S-400. I bet that would be a real challenge.
Well,guys, reality shows that HARM is working,and working well.
Nice one!
Sweet, new content !
Enjoy
WOW!
Every part of that title made the video and instant click
Thanks, hope you liked it
Looks like Im watching Iron Eagle again.
Great Job
Thank you
Very good quality video.
Appreciate it
Liking me some LGS - Lets get some.
Yea... I was the 1000the like. Love ya LS
Love ya too buddy. Thanks
Awesome mission.
Glad you liked it
1 minute on recommended :)
Love the voice filter. Which one are you using?
Its a mix of few effects
I am a little late but great vid and I am going to steal this tactic
Enjoy
@@LongShotChannel lol thanks keep up the great work and have a great rest of your day
You too, thanks
Good mission :)
Thank you sir
Make an air interdiction mission video
comom man, u didnt put any AAA cover...the speed u was passing guys with ak-47 would shoot u down, lol
Nice senario but it Will be more cute if it was s300 instead buk systeme and mig 29 with r77 fox3 instead fox 1
Next time
@@LongShotChannel sure we are waiting To see wild Weasel with s300 its gonna be awesome
@Longshot use the Enable button instead of radar lock...
Cool mission, but no Shilkas defending the battery?
One step at a time buddy.
How do you get that comms sound effect? Do you do something in post-production or do you have some sort of live audio filter?
Post. Im editing it
@@LongShotChannel you use audacity or something?
Premier pro
Whats the software that makes this radio " effect " when you're talking with your wingman?
Its not a software, it is me editing it in Premiere
You can use SRS for a similar effect in-game
I rather have more control over how it comes out.
@@ImperiumLibertas i know SRS im using it all the time
Awesome video as always, can I ask what map was this ?
Thanks. This is the Syria map
What voice software are you using ? It doesn't sound like SRS
Im editing it in Premiere
You guys need to have a plan before you go
this was a flail-ex
Nice video. How do i get my game to look as good as yours?
*WW*
Vin Diesel
Interesting that the site was not defended by SA-18 squads...
Am i alowd to train to be better?
@@LongShotChannel No. No train only skill.
I think normal voice is better for comprehension
5th
5minutes before anything happens is not cool