Why Are We Here? Exploring The Mystery Of Existence
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
- The origin of our universe is one of the greatest mysteries we face. Why is there something rather than nothing? How did we come to exist in a world with such precise laws of nature?
How we answer these questions determines everything, from the meaning of our lives to the secrets of our futures.
This episode of The Poetry Of Reality features Jack Symes in conversation with Richard Dawkins, joined by Jessica Frazier speaking on Hinduism, Silvia Jonas speaking on Jewish philosophy, and Richard Swinburne defending Christianity.
________________________
Join Substack:
richarddawkins...
Subscribe to Poetry of Reality Channel:
/ @poetryofreality
Follow:
Instagram: / the.poetry.of.reality
Twitter: / richarddawkins
Facebook: / richarddawkinsbooks
Reddit: / thepoetryofreality
Richard Dawkins is an incredibly patient man. Admirably so.
I believe he was forced to here.
Richard Dawkins didn't understand (or accept) that this (his) level of consciousness, is but one of many.
Death of the body enables the human spirit to move on into another level of 'awareness' (or consciousness if you prefer).
We are all part of the same eternal spirit which creates (has created) all that is.
There are thousands of accounts relating to NDE's (Near Death experiences) (on You Tube) which illustrate (explain) the levels of consciousness we all (repeat ALL) experience when the physical body dies.
Instead of merely denying (ignoring) this aspect of life, investigate this REALITY for a greater understanding of existence and consciousness. (And of course your own life !)
@@electricmanist Bravo. Exactly.
evidence?
@@alexf1179 You exist. You are here . Now if you consider yourself more than a meaningless accident, you are part of this life (on earth) for a purpose.
I could have listened to Richard Dawkins all night, but when the second guy started speaking, I tried, I really tried , but I just 😴 💤
Same here, he was tortuously tedious
YEP
Yeah that guy is so boring I forgot to listen 😂
It’s still rock and roll to me! 1:09:37
I was eyeball deep in the Pentecostal religion for the first 37 years of my life. Then I came across Mr. Dawkins, Mr. Hitchens, Mr. Barker and Mr. Krauss. My eyes and mind were opened thanks to these great minds. They helped me obtain a peace I had never known. I will be forever grateful to and for them.
What exactly did they teach you? because the only answer they have to the biggest question 's is that they "Don't know"
Sam Harris too - in case you haven’t already :)
you live in a world that creates ourselves.... the search for knowlrdge ends with the journey keep the fires and adventure before the discovery ie. the end of the journey
@@bryn3652 They teach that there is no evidence for religious dogma. Richard Swinburne's characterizations of a cosmos creator are empty assertions.
Richard Dawkins you are so inspiring,
We can see that Professor Richard Dawkins is intellectually three universes away from his fellow guests and that is why it pain us to witness, but he doesn't feel the same way and that is what makes him even greater.
I didn't have the patience to watch all except sir. Richard Dawkins. People of his stature should have been around in the panel. Thank you Richard Dawkins sir.
Greetings from Tamil Nadu India.
Never get tire of listening and to Richard Dawkins
but definitely find the others, mostly the other Richard just plain wrong!
Dawkins is so wrong he is a lost soul 😮
Of course...you are one of the 7% on this planet 😊
Richard you are a true hero. Standing up for truth in a world that has gone mad and in a way that should be used as a template for rational thinking and debate. Defiant, eloquent, open, repectful, and educational. Thank you from the bottom of my heart
richard gives generously to make us seek the wisdom which was imparted to us by the greeks in their islan ds and athens the ancient greeks lived in the meditteranean valley the did not k now that geology in the past had drained their ocean 3 or 4 times by drying up millioons of years ago
I think Richard began to get a bit bored.
Throughout humanity there has been madness, it's nothing new. There are reasons for madness. What is interesting is that there are reasons for virtually everything.
Highly admire Dawkins to be so patient with these fools.
He's the very essence of a gentleman.
My exact thoughts too!
You may disagree with Swinburne (I do too), but he's no fool.
@@vaclavmiller8032 He said incredibly foolish things. Being well spoken and erudite doesn't change that
I agree. As the decades pass, he is much more calm and willing to allow people to blather on. It's respectful and diplomatic.
Dawkins must be nominated for Nobel prize for patience!
Joke of the century 😅
And you are a clown of the century ;)
My three take aways -
The majesty of Richard Dawkin’s mind.
The patience of Richard Dawkin’s the man.
The failing of the host not to stop proceedings to straighten the puckered rug 😂
I love it how people quote old scriptures, wave their hands elaborately and clearly think that they are saying something of interest and value.
“Let him who hath still hands keep also still his lips” -Rodney, Ch 3 Verse 9
And still have no answer to the simple question asked.
meaning: "if ya don't work at anything, who should listen to what you have to say?@@Lopfff
Bible quotes. Nothing more irrational and ignorant than quoting scripture. As if they came up with it in the first place.
No kidding. Some voices are just loud and babble nonsense. It is blatantly obvious that they are just making shit up and have very little actual information of any value that they could even conjure up. Got to vet the speakers. I just walk out when they put dummies on the stage.
Thanks Richard Dawkins for your patience....
Poor Richard Dawkins, being surrounded by nonsense. Already checked his watch twice and keeps breathing in heavily... can feel you, bro.
True. I skipped others and watched his talk only.
it´s hard to agree more, that´s exactly how i feel suffering through these clowns as well. gave everyone a fair shake with their initial statments but it´s just nonsense or meandering talking but saying nothing. i feel my time on earth beeing sucked out of me listening to these npcs, who sound like an ai wrote their dialogue. so skip to dawkins when possible for your own sanity
"Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."@@symmetrie_bruch
Richard Dawkins has been reunited again with these kind of people who believe in magic.
Richard died inside for our sins
Richard is correct; we are living creatures in the here and now, but when our bodies die and decay we are gone forever. So many people are unable to accept this . .
We are unable to accept death because we are animals with a survival instinct
I don't agree with that, what's is the meaning of your life
its the reality and its the truth hence this is why its sad and people fear. people fear what is real because reality doesn't care about your feeling and its usually harsh
To me, Richard Dawkins is the human being that I love, cherish and appreciate the most of all the human beings I know on this planet ❤️
I desperately wish we'd had more Richard Dawkins on earth...
Dawkins is also a fast runner. Look how quick he moved when William Lane Craig.
How can there be any loving or cherishing in a universe of “blind, pitiless indifference”? Answers on a postcard.
Seeing Richard welcome the medium of podcast and take on the big conversations of our time is inspiring. Thankyou!
For Hitch!
NO, HE TALKS SHIT@@Zleec
Imagine this chat without Richard Dawkins 😂
Yeah...they could have started to speak about unicorns maybe... :DDDD
imagine this chat without richard dawkinns the search for truth shines in a beam of light the photon is equivalent of the phantom the ghost who walks
@@AlexFilliosare you psychotic
Turtles upon turtles to infinity and beyond
They would have started talking about magical T pots
I really thank Frazier for putting the ancient Vedic view of the question of origin so well. She could not have stated better
Its surprise that Vedic Philosophy explained something that modern physicists struggle to answer today.
Thank you for your work Richard in continually trying to debate these kind of people. They seem so educated but speak so much mumbo jumbo. You speak with common sense and clarity.
For those who are interested in saving their time and energy you can fast forward the other speakers and lesson to Richard Dawkins
One day you will be extremely embarrassed by this remark.
@@opinion3742 _Please_ elaborate!!! . . .
@@sharkamov No thanks. You go ahead and worship Dawkins to the point of stupidity if you want.
Why do people need a "reason" why we're here, as if we have a mission to carry out. If you have one, you created it.
Such ignorance.
Well, if there is no reason to be here then it doesn't make a difference whether you live or die which is extremely demoralizing. I'm sure you have counter arguments to that, I'm just answering your "why" question.
On what do you base your belief?
@@thulyblu5486it doesn't make a difference wether you live or die if our entire galaxy where to vanish without a trace the rest of the universe would not even notice it, The sooner you Come to terms with that the happier you Will live
Reality doesn't shape itself around what might or might not be demoralizing.
Richard is an evolutionary biologist by trade, but he's a trooper in spirit. Patience and self-control in abundance.
That reminds me of something I read on a philosophy book back in my high school times, "Nature doesn't have the obligation to work based on our capricious thoughts." In other words, it does work even if we don't understand how, and definitely we shouldn't be inventing explanations based on thoughts rather than what nature present us with (evidence).
I agree with Richard Dawkins when he once said that asking, "Why are we here", isn't very meaningful.
Yet he must have been asking himself that while sitting on that stage
Please, Richard, we need more conversations like this. Thank you!
As always Richard Dawkins is the only one talking common sense and debunking nonsense. The others are embarrassingly non scientific and wishy washy.
Absolutely right!
They should mathematically define wishy washy, divide into ancient indian texts and then have Richard S accordingly manipulate his chair particle. Shame Dawkins got in the way with his realistic nonsense
He is not "the only one" Mr I-am-ready-to-kiss-ass-tonight-and-henceforth
@MzeeMoja1 My response to your rather personal comment is that those that support the viewpoint of Dawkins see belief in a god as delusional. It's, therefore, hardly surprising that we would be dismissive of those who try and claim the contrary.
Richard was introduced as the "atheist view". Though I don't have a problem with that, the "science view" would have been more accurate and productive.
The older I get the stronger my atheism becomes. Thank you Hitchens, Dawkins, Darwin, Thales, and many many more.
I think u will be very surprised once you die.....
And Russel brand
Pascal has entered the chat.@@trinitymatrix9719
@@trinitymatrix9719 I know because that’s very emotionally healthy. It’s so healthy to tell a child if they don’t believe in the Bible they will burn in hell forever. Think about what that does to the mind and emotion well being of a child when you tell them this poison
Its absurd and total madness to imagine we are something out of nothing. Are you crazy brother?@@Scorned405
I love these types of conversations and any excuse to hear Richard Dawkins speak is always a treat. My only critique would be to cut the mic on those not speaking. It was slightly distracting to hear others breathing, clearing throats and clicking pens while another spoke. Please keep this content flowing, it's so important. Love what you do!
Dawkins for the win. These conversations are helping me hone my discussion skills above just being emotional and argumentative. Thanks.
Sir Richard Dawkins ( he should be knighted)....The Greatest Exponent in search of truth, Scientific Rational Thinking, he exposes the people who are unable to think , they only play with superfluous words ..their minds our biased in philosophy and religious doctrine...Thank you Sir for your brilliant discourse ...
Richard opened my eyes to the world of free thought
I understood what Richard Dawkins said and absolutely agree with him. I did not understand a think the other three were talking about. That says everything!
They don't want to commit to one clear idea because of how ridiculous it will sound so they talk in generalities and obscure language.
I just want to thank Richard Dawkins 🙏.
As someone who hasn't been Christian for several years all of this sounds like pure bologna aside from Prof. Dawkins's talking points.
They are all stupid. You should listen to Christopher Langan's conclusions.
I've not always agreed with everything Mr dawkins has said, but he absolutely always has a tremendous arguement, knowledge and set of points. I wonder what arguement, knowledge and points these other folk were trying to make??? It's truely mind numbing.
On what do you disagree and why?
@@Dr.Ian-Plect How about his take on gender?
their only point has and will be ''trust me, god done it'' and put that into any gap that current knowledge can not explain.
@@rianmacdonald9454 What you are expressing is not science, it is just the worst kind of ignorance, an ideological stance born out of a narrow mind, zero research, and a generally bad attitude. The fact that you think there is no conversation to be had does not speak well of you. How could it?
@@opinion3742 Well, I wasn't asking you.
But go ahead, lay out his take on gender, don't forget to include how he defines it.
You're a great man Richard. You are so healthy and bright for your age. Keep fighting the good fight.
He doesn't fight the good fight for free. But yes he's a great guy
Silvia Jonas brings Philosophy to the table with the word "purpose", making it very clear that she skipped Existentialism, that was when we noticed that purpose and meaning are aspects of human cognition and a storytelling resource that helps us grasp reality. Sartre, Camus, etc.
This was one of the most painful videos I’ve ever tried to listen to. I couldn’t finish it for fear of taking a head dive into my wood chipper
What an embarrassing performance for Richard Swinburne, who not only constantly clicked his pen and chuckled under his breath while others talked, but even went as far as not even acknowledging Silvia's name when answering her remark near the end. If his old age is to be used as an excuse, then the contrast of this behaviour with Richard Dawkins' who's only 6 years younger goes to show the difference of effects on the brain and character between a life of science and a life of religion.
Having studied Theology in the same era as Swinburne, I always disliked that old school mannerism of chuckling as if that alone proves the other person's ideas so worthless as to be laughable. Still makes me cringe!
Richard Dawkins a wonderful of explaining the things he taks about,and he isn’t bombastic.Hope we can see more of him,a great pleasure to hear him.
Kudos to Professor Dawkins for his patience.
Richard Dawkins, where did you get the patience to listen to other speakers? I am very calm but I admire your calmness.
25:45 "You probably see what I'm getting at." In fact, i was just then thinking, "What on earth is she going on about?"
If you think that the universe had a cause, as she does, then it seems to me you must be thinking, 'The universe is just another thing in the universe'. And if she answers me, 'No I'm not', I would answer 'I believe you are, because otherwise you would see how meaningless and self-contradictory the idea is. 'What caused the universe?', is not a scientific question but one of semantic befuddlement.
The woman in white actually had a reasonable point. It is foolish to expect there to be an "explanation" accessible to human brains to such questions as "why is there something rather than nothing," let alone a "causal" explanation.
The difference between clear thinking and a wishy-washy inconsistent twaddle could not be displayed in a more pronounced way.
It's quite possible to be remarkably whimsical with sophisticated words, wouldn't you agree?
It’s important to listen to all respectfully to understand truths, feelings, beliefs and reality. Humanism plays a significant role.
'Respect' is something _earned_ - not doled out willy-nilly, and _particularly_ not to someone who have nothing at all of _substance_ to contribute to such an important discussion!
No when people talking bollocks..
Thank you, Richard Dawkins.
The Jew and Christian are spouting utter nonsense as one might expect, the Hindu is vacillating between positions without really offering an argument while Professor Dawkins is the only one to make any semblance of sense.
I applaud his ability to endure their deluge of rubbish without bursting into laughter at their insanity.
I remember those wonderful Christmas Lectures back in 1991 when a young Richard Dawkins blew us away with his eloquence and riveting presentations in this very same theater. (especially the one with Douglas Adams).
It’s wonderful to see him looking so well after 32 years, and that his mind is still as sharp as ever.
If he’s inherited his parent’s genes for longevity, he’ll be with us for many years to come.
I remember those too. "Blew us away" is absolutely right. I then read "The Selfish Gene", the first non-fiction book I did not want to put down, but equally did not want to end. He is a treasure.
"The meaning of life is to watch my movies back-to-back." - Chuck Norris
Only really Dawkins getting to grips with reality there. He is immensely patient.
I would enjoy this more with Dawkins typing the jokes he is thinking as the others are talking.
Nice hair bro
😂 I thought the same
Disappointing debate. Would have loved to have heard Dawkins reply to more of the responses!
The other three just sit there and think well we better just be so mysterious that the audience is wowed. Dawkins is amazing.
There are many more than 7% atheist, with so many not daring to announce their belief, or lack of, especially in the Muslim world. I've had colleagues in Algeria and Malaysia state "Eddie, I wish I could speak my mind like you do.
Strict Catholic upbringing are subject to similar dare, though at least official reaction is less severe!!
Another 'failing' of societies is to identify a baby as of a certain religion - like in my world, though actually very casual in nature - not a religious upbringing, I still got a splash of water on my head before I was old enough to 'tell them what to do with it'!
I enjoy listening to these type of discussions however is always amazed how these so called brilliant people would repeatedly engage or entertain these discussion which always end in disagreement and the questions remains unanswered. Well thats brilliance for you.
By now we should know that there are some things that we do not know and living every moment the best way we can is the most important thing we can do.
Thank you for all of your work Richard
That was painful for Richard Dawkins 😊
When we talk to one another, we expand our consciousness. Let me offer these words as a bridge; "Life is the most precious thing that exists in the universe, and love is the most precious thing that exists in life." What we do know from our personal points of view is that the intrinsic value of life is to be happy and flourish...
For 50 years I have been searching for truth and have found that the greatest wisdom is in advaita Vedanta non duality....we can actually experience and be infinite Divine peace and love and bliss....we need to seek deep inside and find the truth... yoga and Buddhism have the best answers to every question....you religious people and atheists should grow up and consider what even Nobel prize winning physicists today are discovering what yogis knew 5,000 years ago 🙏🕉️☮️🥰
That's what happens if you don't read the science textbooks... you end up wasting your life on nonsense. ;-)
Whenever Dawkins takes note of something I hope to see a smackdown coming up (haven’t finished the video yet), but I know he’s gotten softer in old age lol
The meaning of life is to be alive.
What do you mean by „meaning“?
to learn the value of ALL LIFE.
That seems to be the case.
"If religion is going to be taking seriously, it must accord with science."
This was sooooo painful to watch ! The moderator should have kept the guests to the topics first stated. There was so much waffling and word salad from everyone except Richard Dawkins. He was as usual factual, rational, unbelievably calm and utterly polite. There should have been a Physicist in this panel. Well done Mr Dawkins .
Got me a PHD in invisible friends
There should've been a physicist, philosopher, psychologist, Hindu Yogi, Buddhist monk, and theologian with Richard 😅🤣😂
Agree
True randomness, devoid of cause by definition, presents itself as a compelling candidate for the self-existing cause of what we call reality
It would have been better if this were two separate debates. The two ladies could have discussed things ecumenically and compromisingly, while the two Richards could have had a proper battle 😂
I was waiting to see if we’d have a Jerry Springer moment - Richard S vs Richard D halfway through this lecture 😂
Richard Dawkins - you are the Jewel in Humanity’s Crown. Utterly irreplaceable !
Peculiar how otherwise acutely intelligent people can look like kindergarten children in their differences.
That’s why we love comedians who fill up stadiums…when you talk about things that may or may not exist you can say anything you want…relief.
This was a wonderful discussion! Thank you so much. I'm just stuck on Richard Dawkins' 'Wishful Thinking' contemplating if we went beyond the thought and mind, where there is no thought and no wishful thinking.
Richard Dawkins is the only one saying real things. To be faire, even Richard Dawkins is not giving well thought out reflections in this format. The other ones are like child throwing up wishy washy word salads. It's painful, and frankly when you've already been through those reflections before, extremely boring. It's weird that a theist is satisfied with replacing an unknown with another unknown and making up special rules for that unknown so it can't be questioned. Why not just do it with the universe.
Well said.. continous string of "why this and why that " and stopping questions just at the god's facade
Very true.
And ..... the ladys intro category argument : that 7 cant be divided by 3 into equal full parts. That doesnt prove anything ..... thats jibberish.
@@crockmans1386that wasn't a proof. It was an example of an explanation that doesn't involve causation. Her entire train of thought may have been wrongheaded, but it doesn't help to misunderstand her, either.
The venue needs to pony up for a telephoto lens.
Richard Dawkins's case presentation is unarguably practical. A pleasure to listen to. Well done.
After many years I've come to the conclusion that we are given life to witness Gods creations.
I thought this was very interesting but I did think it was sorely missing any mention of a phenomena that in my opinion is extremely relevant in this area which is: Self-organisation.
I think self-organisation (also known as 'spontaneous pattern formation') is a great explanation for how a system can evolve from following only basic (or 'fundamental') rules/laws to something that has emergent laws and structures when you 'zoom out'.
Of course that leaves the question of where the underlying laws came from, but those could've also emerged from self-organisation at a 'smaller' level, and so on. What's at the bottom? Maybe just raw-rule-following (ie perhaps something similar to math or computation?)
Ultimately though, I think the universe caused itself, and why? For the lulz!
Agreed
''Ultimately though, I think the universe caused itself, and why? For the lulz!'' - dude it was a drunken bet from a Saturday night piss up. lol
Yea ,,, as with Richard science is the grounding principle = facts
@johngrundowski3632 Sure the last line was half a joke but self-organisation is a scientific fact and I'm surprised that RichardD doesn't mention it more tbh.
How about this. Emergence occurrences are a phenomenon of a self-organizing system. Existence exists. And nature is the unfolding character of existence. For me what we are are talking about here is the idea that nature has aseity. Aseity is a religious word ascribed to God. Self-originating and self-maintaining. Of such a nature that inquiry into provenance is on it face irrational---or the first line of a joke.
That was painful! I am sure Richard D., went home and poured himself a good single malt!
If anything comes out of this, it is Richard Dawkins' politeness and kindness and his seemingly limitless ability to tolerate meaningless babble. These "thinkers" are reasoning on the same level as the people who claim that obesity is not caused by overeating and that failure to eat less has nothing to do with willpower. It comes over as utterly childish.
its amazing to see how people can convince themselves that their religion is more logical than science
We are the manifestation of the creation of God evolving with doubt and wisdom.. I am so thankful to experience life and thank you for this subject.
Its amazing how far we have come. From being something thinking to being something thinking something else
Wow... you are taking this to another detention. I would love to hear about your thinking@@Glenn-F-Rice
Richard Dawkins, Christoper Hitchens and Carl Sagan, three of the most influential thinkers of our times. Unfortunately we have lost two of them but their impact will be felt, and will hopefully increase, for decades and decades to come. I personally could not show his ability to put up with much of the drivel and gibberish from some of the others.
Whose God? there are so many out.
This has surely taken several years off of Dawkins's life.
That lady don’t understand that believe is not reality, sitting on the right side 💯science is very serious,it can teach you a lot trust ⭐️💯⭐️⭐️⭐️nuff respect to Richard Dawkins 💯this man really have common sense 💯👍
Love from Pakistan to Sir Dawkins
When a student asked the famously witty philosopher Sydney Morgenbesser "Why is there something rather than nothing?", Morgenbesser responded "Even if there were nothing, you still wouldn't be satisfied!"
We are here to learn how to love God as he loves us.
Wow. Jessica Frazier's incites really made me think. This universal mystery has preoccupied me for a long time. I am not going to become a Hindi. I am an atheist but that does not necessarily make me reject all religious notions. I also am glad to see women on this panel. I love women and their absence on this sort of panel really bothers me.
Thank you, I've been scrolling through the comment section looking for anyone else who isn't lumping all the guests together. Jessica was great, possibly even the best part of the debate for me. Grounding beliefs in reality is a pretty scientific belief system.
How could reality be "poetry" without a poet?
Am I alone in thinking that the host is just flat out wrong here: He suggests that Jessica's Hindu mindset is more aligned with Richard Swinburne's Christianity - when her explanations are vastly more aligned with Dawkins' and science, and here: He suggests Sylvia's views align more with Dawkins, when her understanding of causality aligns with Swinburne - I can describe a computer in terms of its functions, therefore its not causal... But why the computer exists is still causal. As with Swinburne's "why did these people come here today?" "For an 'interesting' conversation." "Why do they find it interesting?" "Because .. Because... Because brain chemistry, evolution, upbringing." And we're back to causality.
I don't necessarily have an issue with people who feel there is (must be ) a supreme being or a creator, what bothers me is that somehow this "being" always has a very personal relationship with them...seems not only unlikely, but very egotistical.
It seems more likely actually. The likelihood that someone would spend time designing us and just forget about us is unlikely
Ego: Edging God Out!!!💔🔥
Three of them are just throwing up word salads: lots of talk, not much being said. Especially the Richard who's on the wrong side of history. He's like child saying: it must be this because I see no other explanation when looking straight at the explanations without understanding it. Or refusing to understand it.
I believe in what Richard Dawkins says, the only problem I have is understanding of the complexity of who we are. I do believe the reason that people believe in God is you develop a community of people who think like you do, and your everyday life becomes more tolerable. None of what you have now will be with you once you die, but the feeling of life being better in this new world is a motivator.
Thank you Richard, for your service in the scientific field aswell as a promoter og rationality!
Poor Dawkins surrounded by nonsense and having to stay there very calm. All of them, and specially... Hinduism? WTF???
Richard Dawkins could just delete this debate. It's so boring and he almost doesn't speak, compared to the rest of the panel. He had so many more interesting debates compared to this one.
Oh Richard Swinburne, I hope your brain evolves some day, although I fear time is running out for you.
Even if a single brain could, I fear the evolutionary direction might not benefit humanity as a wfole
@@josmith9662 probably right.👍
The abrupt ending of this video makes me wonder what we didn't get to see.
What Christians seem to never understand is that “explanation” doesn’t mean to “explain things away” without any usefulness to it, it means “explaining in a way that is useful and can be used in the future”. By saying “it was God”, you can’t do anything about it. And we all know that just wishing and preying does nothing unless you actually do something about it.
I feel for Dawkins. He’s surrounded by “bull shit”…
and do you know what grows out of Cow shit ?
which means that saying has two interpretations
one is utter nonsense the other is an eternal truth
the ancients did that a lot with what they left
As above as below As below as Above
So bull shit can, by the sheep and wolves be understood to mean lies , same as saying cat shit, dog shit, bird shit ant shit, all can be transposed into the phrase to mean lies as the meaning transferred actually has nothing to do with the words used
So then the shepherds would transpose only with exact meaning,
So Bull means also cow
why is cow shit different from other shit
Well Magic mushrooms grow out of exactly only cow shit or bull shit
Magic mushrooms are an eternal truth, that will never change, they will always break delusions imagined in the PFC :)
I love the way the ancients play the game
So clever so funny
I said what I said. You know what I meant. Deal with it.
@@truthseeker6016 I have just Proven two interpretations, and you want to imagine there is only one, that everyone understands what one of two you mean lol, have a good delusion :)
🤫🤫🤫
@@gratefulkm You’ve proven NOTHING. Saying something doesn’t prove anything. Yes, you definitely are “Delusional”.
About 2 or 3 people could be dropped and it'd be a great video.
Should have been Dawkins vs Swinburne throughout
The purpose behind existence is to experience-and improve upon your experiences.
Therefore, do not judge or condemn or reject the deficiencies you observe in others but take your perceptions immediately to Divine Consciousness (what many call "God," "Allah," "Jehovah"-etc) and continually ask for a Divine Resolution of the problem.
Hold fast to the realization that wherever, whenever, Divine Consciousness is drawn into a problem the end result is always growth and development for all concerned.
Try to bear in mind always, you are on earth to bring Divine Consciousness down into your daily life, relationships and circumstances. You are here to use your minds for this special purpose.