The reason you switched to Ubuntu from Fedora, that's the exact reason matter when you choose the distro. Not everyone is advanced user, or have the time to spend in babysitting the PC. I used Fedora for a while and faced some issues. After spending a lot of time I could not resolve them. With Arch based distros, getting Nvidia drivers work was a pain for me. I prefer to stick to a simple distro like Ubuntu or Ubuntu based, which are easier to use and manage, and require less babysitting. I can focus on my work instead of my OS.
I resume Linux distros as Arch Debian Fedora. I think they cover 90% of market share. Then there are Gennto, NixOS, Void and others. And the main difference is the package management, some basic libraries and the modified kernel.
Here is one thing i wanna add to this video: Chose distro based on how you feel using it. If you want apps or stuff from other distros use distrobox, that way you can do whatever you want, you can use any app and distro doesn't matter.
@@ArcTechnologies for time being official ubuntu but i am gonna move to debian. It's not that i don't like ubuntu i don't like snaps and cannonical makes removing snaps from future versions on official version more and more dangerous for system because of that the way i see it at some point removing snaps from ubuntu in future may cause system crash. Folks from mint may have noticed a long ago what i mentioned which why they're working on LMDE along with original just in case.
Oh Debian is a good choice but I'm just curious... Why do people hate snaps? I have used Fedora for quite some time. Recently switched to Ubuntu. The only thing that annoys me on Ubuntu is the App Store. I installed Gnome Software which solved the issue.
Oh Debian is a good choice but I'm just curious... Why do you hate snaps? I kinda dislike Ubuntu mainly for other reasons. For example, the Ubuntu App Store is pretty weird so I used Gnome Software separately which solved the issue.
@@ArcTechnologies Snaps are an open standard with a closed store making it effectively a Ubuntu standard. The Ione advantage they have is they work with cli apps, but other than that flatpak is better and more open in every way.
I have been using Linux Mint for years after leaving Ubuntu. It is stable. Missing features: PDF reader features for students, Global menu applet, Wayland support, and PUBG gaming.
I hope in the near future open source projects become the go to option for everything so that people support the project because they are getting value. Thank you. Let me take a look at deepin.
To anyone who might be confused in regards to Linux distro's?...the distro of itself should be something you're comfortable using....if you're not sure?.....and you already have a computer/...you could try using it as a "Live USB" version to get a feel for it.....but my advice to you is this....take what you want from your current PC/ laptop....save it someplace either in the cloud or external storage?...and take the plunge....sure....study the distro you are most drawn to?.....read up on it etc?...but don't meander in between Windows and Linux....find the one for you?...and leave. don't look back...trust me you will not only broaden your mind and expose you to so much more?...but it will also give you a better understanding of computers in general...
hey ive been trying to customize ubuntu mate to make it more accessible for visually impaired but the installer of ubuntu mate is not so readable by the screen reader do you have any idea to fix this
Nice video! At this point after messing around for the first year generally I just recommend Silverblue to new switchers. It prevents them from seriously damaging their OS, stays up to date for hardware support and generally just works. The only drawback is that when they do need to add a package they have to substitute rpm-ostree for dnf, but it's not a huge deal. I also like Vanilla but it's not quite mature enough yet and the advantages it brings are not ones a novice user will need. Your point about not distro hopping is very valid, it becomes it's own hobby and keeps people from really mastering what they have. Unless someone does something amazing and unique, I'll stick with Silverblue until/unless Vanilla reaches parity and demonstrates the ability to provide smooth and routine upgrades to new versions.
I started with Ubuntu and after distro hopping returned back to Ubuntu and keep using it alongside Windows 10 while out of curiosity try various distros through VMs. I guess in terms of desktop environment I'm quiet used to GNOME the way it made on Ubuntu. I don't like vanilla GNOME experience. I also like KDE Plasma as it reminds me of Windows 7 days.
I don't distrohop much, but I do DE hop alot, I chose arch as my primary distro and I don't switch to anything else just like a new DE, hop to it. but i really really love hyprland and gnome
@@ArcTechnologies I used to like plasma but I don't think it is too much polished, it can be made polished don't get me wrong. But theming consistency is a factor here I think I dislike windows in general that's why I don't like the looks. And also hyprland is so much customisable that I spend too much time in it, gnome just works.
Yes I've mentioned it earlier in one of my videos that KDE Plasma isn't very consistent in terms of design. Gnome looks much more professional because of that consistency.
I use arch with Xfce and Hyprland desktop environments 😎. All of that on an old dell latitude e6230 with 8gb of ddr3 ram and 225gb ssd with an intel 2nd gen core i5. It works nice
My current line-up is Pop!_OS on two machines, Windows 11 + WSL, and I very recently swapped out Raspbian for VOID linux. Beyond that, I have experience with Ubuntu, Rockylinux, RedHat, and many more. I still have my stack of CDs I burned back in 2008 for distro hopping. I wonder if the loss of CD drives has hurt the beginner experience some. I know storage is cheaper than ever, but it still does not compare to burning a CD that cost pennies. In fact, the CD was vital to my early journey as the first distro I stuck with was a Puppy linux that loaded into RAM. I would boot from the CD, load my USB storage, and be off to the races. Much like Tails OS now, no trace after shutdown.
I have used multiple distros but yes I also agree that Fedora is one of the best as I didn't face any major problems with it. Only thing I didn't found solution on linux which I daily drive is the Verifying Digital Signatures on PDF, do you have any workaround with this??
Running ubuntu or its official derivative whether it is kubuntu lubuntu xubuntu etc feel slower due to snaps. better to use mint as base and install your fav DE. BTW how is it using debian sid ?
if anyone using firefox tell me that all those AI in firefox lab are free to use after sign in ? if u tried all of them , then which one is best all-rounder?
@@LeelaPavanKumarKakarla the project is a dumpster fire with a lead who has made questionable statements about genocide, LGBT people and refuses to have a code of conduct. He's banned from the Free Desktop project and other spaces due to his behavior. Better off without that kind of garbage.
@@rawmaterials3909 obviously it’s not no one at all, but it’s just something that not many people talk about. It’s normal to slightly exaggerate in video titles and most TH-camrs exaggerate even more
Just stick to a main distro, like Debian, Fedora, or Arch if you have some experience. If you need hand holding and want less CLI then use LinuxMint. Once you learn Linux then you can play around and see what you like or learn to do it yourself. For instance I am good enough I can use any Distro and do whatever I want and make them look pretty much the same and work about the same.
Ubuntu holds your hand and it doesn't have some of the mint downsides as you can install it on a wider array of hardware compared to mint that only works with old hardware and has issues with peripherals and printers that Ubuntu just uses with ease.
@@-Blue-_ I agree but if I get bored with one destro then I can change it as per my mood, with Mac you can't. Also most linux destros are highly customizable.
@@franklin_johnson01 Now idk if you know that but having terrible opinions about your OS choice in the comment section of a video that is about good operating system choices will get you a lot of hate and backlash.
The reason you switched to Ubuntu from Fedora, that's the exact reason matter when you choose the distro. Not everyone is advanced user, or have the time to spend in babysitting the PC. I used Fedora for a while and faced some issues. After spending a lot of time I could not resolve them. With Arch based distros, getting Nvidia drivers work was a pain for me. I prefer to stick to a simple distro like Ubuntu or Ubuntu based, which are easier to use and manage, and require less babysitting. I can focus on my work instead of my OS.
I resume Linux distros as Arch Debian Fedora. I think they cover 90% of market share. Then there are Gennto, NixOS, Void and others.
And the main difference is the package management, some basic libraries and the modified kernel.
As a beginner, I found ZorinOS very appealing when hopping from Windows,
Some recommend Linux Mint as well..
Zorin is beautiful!
@@gr0wnup5 isn't ram consumpsion to high?
you will end-up in arch
Ah Zorin my first love.
Try both.
Here is one thing i wanna add to this video: Chose distro based on how you feel using it. If you want apps or stuff from other distros use distrobox, that way you can do whatever you want, you can use any app and distro doesn't matter.
Thanks for the tip ❤️
Which distro do you use daily?
@@ArcTechnologies for time being official ubuntu but i am gonna move to debian. It's not that i don't like ubuntu i don't like snaps and cannonical makes removing snaps from future versions on official version more and more dangerous for system because of that the way i see it at some point removing snaps from ubuntu in future may cause system crash. Folks from mint may have noticed a long ago what i mentioned which why they're working on LMDE along with original just in case.
Oh Debian is a good choice but I'm just curious... Why do people hate snaps?
I have used Fedora for quite some time. Recently switched to Ubuntu. The only thing that annoys me on Ubuntu is the App Store. I installed Gnome Software which solved the issue.
Oh Debian is a good choice but I'm just curious... Why do you hate snaps?
I kinda dislike Ubuntu mainly for other reasons. For example, the Ubuntu App Store is pretty weird so I used Gnome Software separately which solved the issue.
@@ArcTechnologies Snaps are an open standard with a closed store making it effectively a Ubuntu standard. The Ione advantage they have is they work with cli apps, but other than that flatpak is better and more open in every way.
I have been using Linux Mint for years after leaving Ubuntu. It is stable. Missing features: PDF reader features for students, Global menu applet, Wayland support, and PUBG gaming.
Ohh what a editing which app are you using for edit this videos to next really cool.
Thanks! It is DaVinci Resolve.
I hope in the near future open source projects become the go to option for everything so that people support the project because they are getting value. Thank you. Let me take a look at deepin.
To anyone who might be confused in regards to Linux distro's?...the distro of itself should be something you're comfortable using....if you're not sure?.....and you already have a computer/...you could try using it as a "Live USB" version to get a feel for it.....but my advice to you is this....take what you want from your current PC/ laptop....save it someplace either in the cloud or external storage?...and take the plunge....sure....study the distro you are most drawn to?.....read up on it etc?...but don't meander in between Windows and Linux....find the one for you?...and leave. don't look back...trust me you will not only broaden your mind and expose you to so much more?...but it will also give you a better understanding of computers in general...
thanks for the tips but i gotta say, this is almost impossible to read
i dont think you quite get how most people read the ellipsis as
Having forced in SNAPS, no more canonical's UBUNTU for now, but I can go with other UBUNTU flavors like MINT, Zorin, POP...
hey ive been trying to customize ubuntu mate to make it more accessible for visually impaired but the installer of ubuntu mate is not so readable by the screen reader do you have any idea to fix this
Nice video! At this point after messing around for the first year generally I just recommend Silverblue to new switchers. It prevents them from seriously damaging their OS, stays up to date for hardware support and generally just works. The only drawback is that when they do need to add a package they have to substitute rpm-ostree for dnf, but it's not a huge deal.
I also like Vanilla but it's not quite mature enough yet and the advantages it brings are not ones a novice user will need.
Your point about not distro hopping is very valid, it becomes it's own hobby and keeps people from really mastering what they have. Unless someone does something amazing and unique, I'll stick with Silverblue until/unless Vanilla reaches parity and demonstrates the ability to provide smooth and routine upgrades to new versions.
Thanks you!
Oh wait I noticed the username now! Got your comment after a long time mate 🫂
@@ArcTechnologies Way too busy bud, unfortunately.
I started with Ubuntu and after distro hopping returned back to Ubuntu and keep using it alongside Windows 10 while out of curiosity try various distros through VMs. I guess in terms of desktop environment I'm quiet used to GNOME the way it made on Ubuntu. I don't like vanilla GNOME experience. I also like KDE Plasma as it reminds me of Windows 7 days.
Yes! I'm daily driving Ubuntu now.
I'm not a beginner but I still use an LMDE, it just works)
That's great!
I don't distrohop much, but I do DE hop alot, I chose arch as my primary distro and I don't switch to anything else just like a new DE, hop to it. but i really really love hyprland and gnome
Oh I love gnome too! What do you think about Plasma?
@@ArcTechnologies I used to like plasma but I don't think it is too much polished, it can be made polished don't get me wrong. But theming consistency is a factor here I think I dislike windows in general that's why I don't like the looks. And also hyprland is so much customisable that I spend too much time in it, gnome just works.
@@ArcTechnologies If I don't want any window manager I would choose gnome. But why not use a window manager (currently testing openbox and bspwm)
Yes I've mentioned it earlier in one of my videos that KDE Plasma isn't very consistent in terms of design. Gnome looks much more professional because of that consistency.
I use arch with Xfce and Hyprland desktop environments 😎. All of that on an old dell latitude e6230 with 8gb of ddr3 ram and 225gb ssd with an intel 2nd gen core i5. It works nice
Great setup!
@@ArcTechnologies thanks
What themes do you have on your gnome? It looks awesome
My current line-up is Pop!_OS on two machines, Windows 11 + WSL, and I very recently swapped out Raspbian for VOID linux. Beyond that, I have experience with Ubuntu, Rockylinux, RedHat, and many more.
I still have my stack of CDs I burned back in 2008 for distro hopping. I wonder if the loss of CD drives has hurt the beginner experience some. I know storage is cheaper than ever, but it still does not compare to burning a CD that cost pennies. In fact, the CD was vital to my early journey as the first distro I stuck with was a Puppy linux that loaded into RAM. I would boot from the CD, load my USB storage, and be off to the races. Much like Tails OS now, no trace after shutdown.
I have used multiple distros but yes I also agree that Fedora is one of the best as I didn't face any major problems with it. Only thing I didn't found solution on linux which I daily drive is the Verifying Digital Signatures on PDF, do you have any workaround with this??
which distro you using on your main ARC?
I use arch linux for now, BTW (With XFCE, Hyprland, labwc [openbox but wayland])
Running ubuntu or its official derivative whether it is kubuntu lubuntu xubuntu etc feel slower due to snaps. better to use mint as base and install your fav DE. BTW how is it using debian sid ?
Hello sir , as a developer who uses flutter everyday please suggest me desktop and distro please...
Hello fellow flutter dev 🫂
I would suggest the original Ubuntu with Gnome.
Thank you sir@@ArcTechnologies
if anyone using firefox tell me that all those AI in firefox lab are free to use after sign in ?
if u tried all of them , then which one is best all-rounder?
switched to Ubuntu, never looked back
now it time for arch
Can you share some links about gtk theme manager, that looks super cool.
Thanks! Visit bit.ly/evolvegtk
Quality content bos
Haha... Thanks! Trying my best.
commenting from Arch (xfce) :)
Great choice!
Fedora workstation ❤❤❤
Great video
No mention of openSUSE tumbleweed?
Would you review Turkman Linux?
Sure will check it out.
Good job!
can u share your evolve github repo?
github.com/arcnations-united/evolve
Thanks for showing your interest! Everything's a work in progress as of now...
7:57 Damn, you could tell how sad he was saying that.
He didn't fail Fedora, Fedora failed him.
Haha...
Trying to set things up on Fedora 41. Pretty solid even in Alpha!
I'm using windows on my ssd for gaming and arch+xfce4 on usb for study and productivity cuz I procrastinate a lot on windows
when will next version of xfce desktop will arrive ?
December 12, V 4.20
I think a wm( like hyprland bspwm )is very light wieght but not for beginners
@@LeelaPavanKumarKakarla the project is a dumpster fire with a lead who has made questionable statements about genocide, LGBT people and refuses to have a code of conduct. He's banned from the Free Desktop project and other spaces due to his behavior.
Better off without that kind of garbage.
bspwm is best as lightweight wm. hyprland is good but not lightweight.
I use arch btw
Me too
BTW I use Arch linux ;)
arch linux is the best distro. period
Great choice!
The best boy friend ever..! 👽❤
LoL 😂
Weirdest compliment
I'm sorry... but which part of your video contains the informations NOBODY is supposed to talk about, as the title clearly states? 😑
@@rawmaterials3909 obviously it’s not no one at all, but it’s just something that not many people talk about. It’s normal to slightly exaggerate in video titles and most TH-camrs exaggerate even more
BTW .. you missed one.
Just stick to a main distro, like Debian, Fedora, or Arch if you have some experience. If you need hand holding and want less CLI then use LinuxMint.
Once you learn Linux then you can play around and see what you like or learn to do it yourself. For instance I am good enough I can use any Distro and do whatever I want and make them look pretty much the same and work about the same.
Ubuntu holds your hand and it doesn't have some of the mint downsides as you can install it on a wider array of hardware compared to mint that only works with old hardware and has issues with peripherals and printers that Ubuntu just uses with ease.
3:48 gnome dont look like this bruh
Yeah it's themed
tell me the Linux Distro that doesn't look like macOS 🤢🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮
@@-Blue-_ I agree but if I get bored with one destro then I can change it as per my mood, with Mac you can't.
Also most linux destros are highly customizable.
All linux distros are a PITA
dont use linux if you want to game and have a good time in general
@@supernewhuman I game on Linux and have a great time in general!
Linux mint makes me wanna puke..the colors fatigue my eyes after long hours of usage..
You know you can change themes and single accent colors if you dont like it
Mint-L Dark is my favorite overall theme.
The best distro is windows 11
Sorry
@@franklin_johnson01 Now idk if you know that but having terrible opinions about your OS choice in the comment section of a video that is about good operating system choices will get you a lot of hate and backlash.
@@franklin_johnson01 clown
😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
Great joke