You can read the Future of European competitiveness report, both "Part A | A competitiveness strategy for Europe" and "Part B | In-depth analysis and recommendations" at the following link: commission.europa.eu/topics/strengthening-european-competitiveness/eu-competitiveness-looking-ahead_en
@@ChristopherReinkedoesn’t matter about the Lingo as a Lot of countries speak it and IF you put Subtitles on it it won’t satisfy EVERYBODY !. I for one are glad it’s in English as I,m Not living in the UK at the moment BUT live on a EU country so applies to ME!
EU is in decline because the Europeans have not adopted automation & digitization & robotization in a large scale. That's the only way to improve productivity, i.e. GDP/hour.
@@NoName-hg6ccNon che ci voglia tanto, noi italiani sappiamo distinguerci pure per coglionaggine. Solo da noi uno come Draghi potrebbe essere mandato via per la Meloni.
@@cwpv2477 Why not. There is no argument. This man is a highly educated economist with long term views and no political affiliation. He'd be perfect for the EU commission
@@matt003 Draghi worked for the World Bank in Washington, D.C., throughout the 1980s, and in 1991 returned to Rome to become Director General of the Italian Treasury. He left that role after a decade to join Goldman Sachs, where he remained until his appointment as Governor of the Bank of Italy in 2006. His tenure as Governor coincided with the 2008 Great Recession, and in the midst of this he was selected to become the first Chair of the Financial Stability Board, the global standard-setter that replaced the Financial Stability Forum. He left those roles after his nomination by the European Council in 2011 to serve as President of the ECB. The ecb politics are led by non elected officials that usually listen to what the member states have to say. As we all know the last 10 years of the european economy have been terrible. He also is connected to various american based banks, and: On 14 July 2022, the M5S revoked support to Draghi's coalition government regarding a decree concerning economic stimulus to offset the energy crisis. On the same day, despite having largely won the confidence vote, Draghi announced his resignation as prime minister, which was rejected by President Mattarella.[22] On 21 July, Draghi resigned for a second time following the failure of the confidence vote to pass with an absolute majority due to the withdrawals of M5S, Lega, and FI. On the same day, President Mattarella accepted the resignation and Draghi remained in office as caretaker prime minister. He was not able to hold his own gov or did not want to. He said great words in this report. I doubt it will be realised. I also highly doubt the current trend to look at the eu like a superstate.
Mario Draghi is a clever man, and he’s speaking the truth. But, in fact, many people have been saying this for years. The term "industrial policy" (though Mr. Draghi still denies it, likely to save face) was once unspeakable in polite circles. It was pure ideology, disguised as common sense. Those who called attention to it were ignored, ostracized, or mocked-until very recently. For them, this must feel both vindicating and insulting. Entire countries suffered deindustrialization and austerity policies in the name of cutting labor costs, market flexibility, and other empty promises, which were supposed to lead to innovation and prosperity. The results, however, are clear: lack of competitiveness, public anger, political instability, and scapegoating of the most vulnerable, including the migrant population. Now that the situation can’t be ignored, they suddenly communicate a change of heart. It’s not quite a full reversal, but it certainly feels overdue. The treatment of the qualified workforce has also been abysmal. For example, in Germany, the most economically important country in the union, PhDs are forced to take short-term jobs repeatedly, preventing them from focusing on any long-term projects-those that contribute to innovation and productivity-while jeopardizing their own economic well-being. Many suffer from depression, mental breakdowns, or simply leave research altogether, taking jobs in other sectors where they are overqualified but at least financially secure. Others leave Europe, contributing their ideas to other geopolitical regions where their qualifications and potential are respected, protected, and promoted. Meanwhile, some sink into poverty, their potential wasted. Is this any way to manage your top scientific talent? Could there be a more stupid approach? Despite official protests from academic bodies, nothing has changed. The rhetoric about innovation and productivity, while essential, now rings hollow. The issue of public finance has also been raised for years. Yet the official stance has always been to minimize public expenditure as much as possible. All sort of ideologues built entire careers on this nonsense. Meanwhile, less developed countries in the EU were constrained by the single currency, which, by design, prevented them from increasing public spending in the first place. Other more developed countries, like Germany, voluntarily shot themselves in the foot by legally restricting the productive use of public funds-a situation that persists even now. We can all imagine the impact this has had on wages and living standards for low- and middle-income earners. And now, they’re asking all member states to contribute again. What effect will this have on these countries’ internal situations? More austerity for the poor? More taxes on the middle class? Too little, too late. I sincerely hope I’m wrong.
In Iraly we got him s prime minister. We didn't have any little improovment.Just Bla bla bla. About Ucraine he told us " you prefer air cond or peace?". Actually we don't have aircond,we don't use eater in winter and the war is full power. I think he is more close to a clown than a genius.
A good political potential was created, at least we talk about the report in Poland, so it can be used to create more uniform market, and break down local politics. It slows EU companies down.
I live in Asia. I had chance to experience living in the country where the large projects are successfully completed. Industry is thriving and growing according to the strategies. When EU needs 1 year to write a 70pages report (this is what I found), you know how far these people are from the market.
Honest question, do you think you can write a report to give the direction on the future 20 years you take the same time as building a train station? China took less than 1 year for its report on china 2049?
when you start from 0 it's easier to go to 100... the real challenges starts when you have to go from 100 to 101. Many asian countries are now experiencing a slow down in their economies and demographic problems as well. Do not think Europe is incapable of improving but it's very hard to change a system so complex like the EU.
von der Leyen will go down in history as one of the key factors of the erosion and even downfall of the EU. She is a catastrophe for the future of the EU.
Europe must invest more in Europe and try their best to stop startups and any influence from the big powers outside like America. There is a lot of potential in Europe.
How is decarbonization expected to save Europe's economy? The history of progress in the energy sector has evolved from wood to coal to fossil fuels to nuclear energy (energy pattern: more calories per mass). Currently, batteries are not even close in their ability to store energy compared to oil. How will this new set of political directions help Europe overcome these physical limitations? Is it a vision to keep us occupied by restructuring established sectors and polluting the environment with windmills? Perhaps, I am not fully aware of the technological forecast. Does anyone have an opinion on this?
Green does not imply batteries. The current problem with energy is that the price is so high in the eu that it can’t be competitive. The conjecture is that switching to renewable sources will drop that cost significantly.
Look at Sweden. They were not aiming in decarbonization in the 90s, just increasing the energy offer (to the point it is still one of the cheapest in the EU today). They looked at the prices, natural capacities and long-term strategy and end up with a lot of Hydro, nuclear and some wind. The problem today is not that renewables are more expensive (solar and wind are cheaper than nuclear for instance), the problem is the f*cked up pricing model and the lack of offer. If we increase the offer a lot (it requires huge investment) we decarobonize together with lowering the energy prices
Carbon is not a pollutant, life is based on carbon. We breath out carbon dioxide, the plants use it to make oxygen and food for us (photosynthesis). Decarbonisation can enrich only the "elites" via new technologies under their control and via taxes on carbon.
EU is far advanced in looking after its public social civil civic systems its very visible and result oriented also its easier to manage it because of small sized compact Nations
32:00 "The task is now to define these common European projects" Seriously? You had 1 year, during which you came up with 2 PDFs and just now you will be defining the projects?? No wonder with these inefficient bureaucrats EU can never catch up to the US
Get a grip, they are supposed to strategically take action year on year. What do u think this is. And the US has double the debt than Europe carry, so don’t place ur bets just yet
Now for the most important part... Apply it. It would be a shame if they didn't apply it after his amazing work with the report. Europe needs less regulation, make the continent startup and business friendly, and invest like crazy in silicon and technology, but the good kind, not just digitalisation.
Dear European Commissioners, We have extremely good talents in Europe. European talents leave Europe because of a lack of investments (the EU should NOT do it) by private investors, due to regulation of work and taxes. Big companies avoid taxes, small ones do not, which makes it harder for the small ones who innovate. I am making this point simple to convey. It is an extremely bad decision to think that the EU is the solution because no investments are made by the private sector in tech. The EU should step back instead of becoming more involved. The policies seem to be purely ideological and not logical. I tend to believe this is due to ideology and maybe a bit of incompetence. However, from a logical standpoint, if we believe you are capable and unbiased in terms of ideology, these reforms are forcing states, through their debt or assets, to finance big corporations to build your vision, which ultimately gives you more power. I believe it is likely to be a mix of both, but in any case, communism ended badly, and if Europe continues on this path, it will not be much different. Regarding european defence, I do not know if you envy the United States, but our situations are very different. A European defense would be good for independence and the defense industry, but the states should oversee it. We do not share the same 3,000 years of history. Individuals need an attachment to their history and culture. This leads to population collapse-look at Mongolia, a model for society in that regard. If individuals do not have attachment, there is nothing to fight for. Hence why nationalism is returning? I am not advocating for nationalism, but people are increasingly against you. Going further in your ideology will not make things better. Listen to the people and make policies briging what they express and what is possible. Centralization without accountability to the people will lead to failure, and "common debt here is instrumental" seems to perfectly fit that description. Sincerely, AnotherEuropeanCitizen
Big companies avoid taxes and little ones do not? And that is the reason little companies don't invest in innovation, you believe. I'm sorry, sadly the countrary has been proven times and times again. Those are not happy results, but big companies remain the engine of nations because little ones don't have reason to invest big sums of money on research and developement, nor the expertise required...
@@dariobelardi333 various factors explain the lack of investment in innovation, but as said by the comissioners, there is a lack of investment. The intent of the letter is to say that the causes of non-investment should be tackled and not avoided by the EU investing itslef instead of the private sector.
@@Justanother1ne Deregulation of the market? Are you out of your mind? Yeah and what do you think it will happpen in the mean time? That foreign corporations will stay there watching and allow us to grow? For the love of God, even with regulations Amazon managed to cut off a lot of our internal retail market, with no protections we will be exposed. US companies use their size for predatory acquistions. Not only, Chinese corporations use CCP's funds to beat local markets through unfair competition. Without regulations our economies will be held hostage. Also nationalism doesn't work the way you think it does. It looses all its value once a group becomes big and diverse enough.
@@dejabu24 Despite the weird xenophobia that completely ignores the fact that the jobs occupied by immigrants in germany at the moment would be uncovered if not for them and all this while still needing more labour as of today. I agree with the rest. The EU needs to be more united, not more fragmented. The rest of the world is getting bigger, the EU can't become smaller.
Every state in the world does invest a bit. Why shouldn't EU do it? And while taxation shouldn't be excessive to strangle businesseses, big companies, especially if foreign, cannot expect not to pay a certain sum EU should absolutely become more involved especially on some strategic sectors, but I agree policies must no be based on ideologies. As for the single defense, no single states meet the requirements. As an American during the Revolution said, we either hang together or we hang separately. Moreover, we do share millennia of History, which is not only war
@@NoName-hg6cc The report on the future of European competitiveness written by Mario Draghi has been published by the European Commission. I am providing you with the website address below. As for the rest, we know why the European Union doesn't work and will never work, because the European states will never accept a complete and successful federalist project, because their interests are far too divergent. For example, France has a special link with the French-speaking world that others don't. Italy has a completely different industrial structure to Ireland, Cyprus or Malta. There are also anthropological differences in the way people relate to work. The different history of social struggles, the different degree of attachment to the notion of public service. In short, for all these reasons and more, the European Union, the federalist and pan-European project, cannot exist in this situation. This is why, as has always been the case since 1992, it will be an ever greater and more serious failure. Here is the address of the site. Good week to you. commission.europa.eu/topics/strengthening-european-competitiveness/eu-competitiveness-looking-ahead_en
European Union is a story of success. A team of European countries who have the same goal: peace, prosperity. GREEN ECONOMY for EU it mean MORE MONEY STAY INSIDE EU. If we make our energy , by solar, wind, water / hydro, nuclear - all green energy - all the money will stay in EU countries and we wont send the money to Arab countries, Russia, Norway, USA and UK (and these sent money to import oil and gas who pollute our air and destroy our environment!)
@@Eduard.Popa. sound very good but is not working because green energy solutions are not ready and are far more expensive than fossil fuels at this moment. The EU has started a transition without having the new technologies ready. By doing this it is killing its industry and is adding enormous economic burdens in the weakest segments of EU population.
I wanted to formulate my thoughts fully at first, but I have to now. War in Europe is not beneficial to you, no matter how much you fear Russia and do not want to throw Ukrainian corpses into the space between you and Russia. It is a huge amount of money, instability and constant change of political elites, since people are constantly dissatisfied with foreign policy and worry about the future. In Moldova, Transnistria, Georgia, Abkhazia, Ossetia it has always been like this, create a gray zone, and in Ukraine - Dobnas and Crimea, and everything will calm down. Ukraine is losing the most precious thing - life, but then you will lose Europe because of national populists. It is time to negotiate.
Fair enough Mario . Well , until the Fiscal Policy will be held by single State entities , foreign companies would be only interested in coming to Europe for laundering their profits in Luxembourg or Netherlands for example, altering the EU market. Fiscal Policy and Defense Policy are two pivotal bedrocks for strengthening and enhancing our global position. It doesn’t suffice having “a more digital and green economy “
European Union is witnessing Deindustrialsation. CHINA is outpacing European Union in Industrialization & Industrial development, along with infrastructure development. EU is crumbling 🥴
@@mise1348 because progress comes from private initiative never from public regulations and because we don’t need more debt, we need to attract private capital and this comes with economic freedom and a good legal framework. Why do you think the unicorns escape the EU to go to US?
@@cantacann just to get a first hand opinion of how much and how bad the EU bureaucracy regulates: ask any farmer in your country what is his opinion about this subject and what he thinks about the EU regulations
@@julio5prado I lives all my life in agriculture, regulation is bad, but agriculture is deeply subsidized. These subsidies are the cause of millions of people starving around the world. So, mostly farmers in the EU are the cause of children dying in Africa.
Industry needs continuous energy production. Some days it will be cloudy, some days it will be rainy. Some days there won't be any wind. Besides that, while producing those solar panels, you already release CO2 into the environment (think of the amount you have to produce). An engineer could calculate the amount of m² it would take to plant those solar panels and wind turbines. You cannot depend on nature, that's why civilization had to advance so far. The only option is diverse energy production, WITH nuclear. People should face it, or our kids won't have any habitable world.
Draghi Competitiveness Report , as well as VdL " Clean Industrial Deal " , make a very important point : INNOVATION. Take Electric Tractors and Farm Equipment: Europe , like many other Countries, has no Oil & Gas , so Electric Equipment for Farms and Construction is vital , many Countries Farmers and Construction Business are paying unsustainable prices for Diesel ,etc., so Electric - Hybrid Farm and Construction Equipment is a huge business. A few € billions well allocated can create local Manufacturing, Businesses, Parts, Services and skilled Workers for local Markets and Exports .
Following this and Ms. Meloni - will continue to do a fine job at pushing back when there are too many mandatory requirements that may compromise the republic. Draghi a steady hand- Good to see a functioning body like Italy - grapple with when to draw red lines.
The European Union is one of the few Countries in the World that can raise € 800 bn or € 1 Trillion and upgrade it's Manufacturing, Industrial , Financial, Skilled Workers & Machinists quality levels and outputs , change to Electric Transportation, new Heat Pumps, advance Drones, Agrivoltaics , etc. Very few Countries can do this level of upgrades and reforms . Why not do it ?
@@袁大陸 When the billions start flowing into EU green reindustrialization, you might end with another insight. What is certain is that the EU has the know how, and techs, necessary.
@@lacommission.-sitcom696 European troops invaded China grabbing its wealth and resources,prompting their people’s living standards before; now European countries only reduce their living standards to compete with China. The senile EU wants to compete with young new China not so easy.
@@errormatrix4159 In face of the III world war, European countries waste their budget on military equipment and ammunition, now they have no money to rebuild their technology industry ……
What’s the answer to Batteries of EV cars and Where’s the Electric coming from when countries are NOT set up for this Even now and getting rid of them and the turbine church hats that’s around the world and EV cars that you Can’t get rid of after they can’t be rebuilt in a crash and covering the world with Field’s that you can’t have any wild animals and Farm animals too ?. And again you CANOT recycle them either ?
Competitiveness only comes with capitalism and its rewards meaning low taxes . But also much less regulations. But also people that know how to create and compete. After decades of socialism. Those people do not exist. Everyone is now a socialist in their minds. Wants an easy job, vacations and early retirement. Europe is set to decline and that decline might now take on speed.
True socialism is you arre part of our community, you work and then you have the rights to get stuff if bad things happen , and everyone have to do that , this is not that , this is like because I was born this or that way I’m entitled to get something, also socialism is for the people of a country not for the entire world
Distribution of money that nobody has, but is created out of nothing, for things that nobody wants, for people and organizations that do not deserve it, to keep the circulation of money going.
Give more money to the people and let them decide what they want to do with it instead of forcing people to "buy" services which the governments think are good.
C'è solo un piccolo pensiero che non mi dà pace, la paura collettiva nel dire che in Italia a completamente sbagliato la riforma della giustizia, dando più potere ai corrotti ed ai corrotti. 2 parlano di più armi ma non di più diplomazia. Viene trattato da sovrano assoluto ma siamo in una democrazia e fiero di ciò scrivo questo post. Non è tutto ora quello che luccica.
🇪🇺 thanks for making this public. EEC/EU can you make Q&A with subtitles so the rest of the World can understand the questions asked? On hoe Europe can succeed? You can start with the happy knowledge the rest of the World loves Europe and wants to be part of its rebuilding. Making all EEC/EU discussion in subtitles so we can all be part of the progress to success.
Totalmente d'accordo. Ma ad una simile soluzione ci si arriverà o con la vittoria di Donald Trump o dall'unione dell'estrema destra con l'estrema sinistra unici movimenti ad oggi non ricattabili dai fondi internazionali di investimento ed unici politicamente avversi alla globalizzazione.
La maggior parte delle delle persone parla del suo popolo crede nelle capacità del suo paese pensare in grande vuol dire mettersi nei panni di altri paesi come un governo ed la politica cercano di susitere altre economie in difficoltà ed nella crescita il gruppo Europe si permette di avere una sua diplomazia, cerco di non fare mai dei esempi, ma guardare un TH-camr americano con i migliori prodotti che usa durante i suoi video ed guardare queste persone che parlano di un prodotto parlando inglese reputo che il mercato sarà interno non avrà possibilità in altri paesi, guardare un TH-camr asiatico o africano parlano di quello che hanno ma sapere che gli sta guardano un europeo capisco che investire soldi per il intrattenimento di qualità a sempre una buona resa, l'europa guarda le problematiche che le circondano come l'industria, l'industria sta cambiando nella vita della persona con quale precisione ed ricerca le industrie portano alla rovina di o crescita di un paese e continenti,
Finally something is going on. First time I saw the commission set a vision. We will see now if they are somehow capable of acting with the existing corset of paragraphs..... Either the end of the EU or the beginning
Shouldnt innovation come from the youth just like during the last few millenias? It would be an entirely innovative type of innovation if the EU was able to come up with an innovation drive without a quantitavely important youth cohort.
Then WHY keep throwing money at Ukraine ,you can only stroke the bear SO Long and he will wake up ,when Zelenskyy is loaded too ,it seems odd TO ME his palaces have Never been hit !. So that’s the Onlt reason we have to think about the war !.
Its called "The futureof European competitiveness", look it up on Bing. Part A is a summary, 60 pages, Part B is 350 something pages long and the full version
@@bunktwr it's great that we've achieved that but times change. Without the union, each individual country would be too small to matter at global level. Just look at the UK and how difficult it is to even import goods. What we need is common low EU-wide taxation, unified commerce laws, similar to encourage investment in what remains one of the richest markets in the world.
You can read the Future of European competitiveness report, both "Part A | A competitiveness strategy for Europe" and "Part B | In-depth analysis and recommendations" at the following link:
commission.europa.eu/topics/strengthening-european-competitiveness/eu-competitiveness-looking-ahead_en
❤❤❤
@@EuropeanCommission corrupted
Why is the report in English only? Are you aware the UK has now left the EU?
@@ChristopherReinkedoesn’t matter about the Lingo as a Lot of countries speak it and IF you put Subtitles on it it won’t satisfy EVERYBODY !.
I for one are glad it’s in English as I,m Not living in the UK at the moment BUT live on a EU country so applies to ME!
EU is in decline because the Europeans have not adopted automation & digitization & robotization in a large scale. That's the only way to improve productivity, i.e. GDP/hour.
I would really like this man to lead the EU commission sooner than later
@@TainyT888 Why are you offending, learn how to carry a confrontation
puh pls no
😂😂😂 Povero cucciolo
@@NoName-hg6ccNon che ci voglia tanto, noi italiani sappiamo distinguerci pure per coglionaggine. Solo da noi uno come Draghi potrebbe essere mandato via per la Meloni.
@@TruenoBestWaifu Per fortuna la Meloni sta seguendo, in politica estera almeno, la sua linea
Please give that man responsibility in the EU.
pls dont
Power
Grazie
@@cwpv2477 Why not. There is no argument. This man is a highly educated economist with long term views and no political affiliation. He'd be perfect for the EU commission
@@matt003 Draghi worked for the World Bank in Washington, D.C., throughout the 1980s, and in 1991 returned to Rome to become Director General of the Italian Treasury. He left that role after a decade to join Goldman Sachs, where he remained until his appointment as Governor of the Bank of Italy in 2006. His tenure as Governor coincided with the 2008 Great Recession, and in the midst of this he was selected to become the first Chair of the Financial Stability Board, the global standard-setter that replaced the Financial Stability Forum.
He left those roles after his nomination by the European Council in 2011 to serve as President of the ECB. The ecb politics are led by non elected officials that usually listen to what the member states have to say. As we all know the last 10 years of the european economy have been terrible. He also is connected to various american based banks, and: On 14 July 2022, the M5S revoked support to Draghi's coalition government regarding a decree concerning economic stimulus to offset the energy crisis. On the same day, despite having largely won the confidence vote, Draghi announced his resignation as prime minister, which was rejected by President Mattarella.[22] On 21 July, Draghi resigned for a second time following the failure of the confidence vote to pass with an absolute majority due to the withdrawals of M5S, Lega, and FI. On the same day, President Mattarella accepted the resignation and Draghi remained in office as caretaker prime minister. He was not able to hold his own gov or did not want to. He said great words in this report. I doubt it will be realised. I also highly doubt the current trend to look at the eu like a superstate.
Mario Draghi is a clever man, and he’s speaking the truth. But, in fact, many people have been saying this for years. The term "industrial policy" (though Mr. Draghi still denies it, likely to save face) was once unspeakable in polite circles. It was pure ideology, disguised as common sense. Those who called attention to it were ignored, ostracized, or mocked-until very recently. For them, this must feel both vindicating and insulting. Entire countries suffered deindustrialization and austerity policies in the name of cutting labor costs, market flexibility, and other empty promises, which were supposed to lead to innovation and prosperity. The results, however, are clear: lack of competitiveness, public anger, political instability, and scapegoating of the most vulnerable, including the migrant population. Now that the situation can’t be ignored, they suddenly communicate a change of heart. It’s not quite a full reversal, but it certainly feels overdue.
The treatment of the qualified workforce has also been abysmal. For example, in Germany, the most economically important country in the union, PhDs are forced to take short-term jobs repeatedly, preventing them from focusing on any long-term projects-those that contribute to innovation and productivity-while jeopardizing their own economic well-being. Many suffer from depression, mental breakdowns, or simply leave research altogether, taking jobs in other sectors where they are overqualified but at least financially secure. Others leave Europe, contributing their ideas to other geopolitical regions where their qualifications and potential are respected, protected, and promoted. Meanwhile, some sink into poverty, their potential wasted. Is this any way to manage your top scientific talent? Could there be a more stupid approach? Despite official protests from academic bodies, nothing has changed. The rhetoric about innovation and productivity, while essential, now rings hollow.
The issue of public finance has also been raised for years. Yet the official stance has always been to minimize public expenditure as much as possible. All sort of ideologues built entire careers on this nonsense. Meanwhile, less developed countries in the EU were constrained by the single currency, which, by design, prevented them from increasing public spending in the first place. Other more developed countries, like Germany, voluntarily shot themselves in the foot by legally restricting the productive use of public funds-a situation that persists even now. We can all imagine the impact this has had on wages and living standards for low- and middle-income earners. And now, they’re asking all member states to contribute again. What effect will this have on these countries’ internal situations? More austerity for the poor? More taxes on the middle class?
Too little, too late. I sincerely hope I’m wrong.
well said old boy
Report says all the right things. Have to see European politicians react adequaly to correct the problems to believe it.
He is very right. It is time to be realistic and count how beautiful is Europe. We need strong industrial policy shared by all state members
Per un'Europa unita e forte! Grazie Mario. 🇪🇺
Finally somebody said the obvious - the king is naked! Give this man to spearhead this change!
In Iraly we got him s prime minister. We didn't have any little improovment.Just Bla bla bla.
About Ucraine he told us " you prefer air cond or peace?".
Actually we don't have aircond,we don't use eater in winter and the war is full power. I think he is more close to a clown than a genius.
Para decir lo obvio no hace falta ningún informe.. Hasta los más comunes de los ciudadanos sabemos eso.
A good political potential was created, at least we talk about the report in Poland, so it can be used to create more uniform market, and break down local politics. It slows EU companies down.
I live in Asia. I had chance to experience living in the country where the large projects are successfully completed. Industry is thriving and growing according to the strategies. When EU needs 1 year to write a 70pages report (this is what I found), you know how far these people are from the market.
Honest question, do you think you can write a report to give the direction on the future 20 years you take the same time as building a train station?
China took less than 1 year for its report on china 2049?
It’s almost 400 pages not 70.
when you start from 0 it's easier to go to 100... the real challenges starts when you have to go from 100 to 101. Many asian countries are now experiencing a slow down in their economies and demographic problems as well. Do not think Europe is incapable of improving but it's very hard to change a system so complex like the EU.
@@lore00star a lot of that complexity has been self-inflicted. EU should have worked to simplify and integrate things, not hyper-regulate
@@cantacann1. This report will not be applied. 2. EU changes its policies every year. Nothing here is to stay for 20 years. EU is governed by ppt.
Grazie Mario
@@TainyT888 Spiega.
@@maxharbig1167 Si è sbagliato l'ha confuso con il videogame super mario bros!!
Thank god there is Draghi. I really hope the Eu will listen and act for real
Congratulations for your excellent video on how can European Union become more competitive in the future as a region.
OMG, I rewatched this video 20 times. I love it.
von der Leyen will go down in history as one of the key factors of the erosion and even downfall of the EU. She is a catastrophe for the future of the EU.
Why?
Where can we download the report? Thank you in advance
i2.res.24o.it/pdf2010/Editrice/ILSOLE24ORE/ILSOLE24ORE/Online/_Oggetti_Embedded/Documenti/2024/09/09/2024-Draghi-report-PART-A-V3.pdf
commission.europa.eu/document/download/ec1409c1-d4b4-4882-8bdd-3519f86bbb92_en?filename=The%20future%20of%20European%20competitiveness_%20In-depth%20analysis%20and%20recommendations_0.pdf
@@lorydexccplease explain. Or point an explanation.
Thanks
first comment pinned under the video :)
Mario Draghi is the most respected public figure worldwide. A true treasure in these times of crisis and anxiety for the future.
Yeah. No.
@@rhenriquez73 the wolf in the sheeps flock!
you what
When we implement it?
Great speach and report. It is important to make EU aparatus effective and agile to ensure decision making. Start acting!
In Italy we have been so blind to make Mr.Draghi go. This man should be now be given a pivotal role in the EU community.
Draghi would have been wasted as Italy PM
Let’s stand all together for our common land. Europe is calling 🇪🇺
🤣🤣
LONG LIVE EUROPE
Europe must invest more in Europe and try their best to stop startups and any influence from the big powers outside like America.
There is a lot of potential in Europe.
Implement the Plan soon, sooner than possible
How is decarbonization expected to save Europe's economy? The history of progress in the energy sector has evolved from wood to coal to fossil fuels to nuclear energy (energy pattern: more calories per mass). Currently, batteries are not even close in their ability to store energy compared to oil. How will this new set of political directions help Europe overcome these physical limitations? Is it a vision to keep us occupied by restructuring established sectors and polluting the environment with windmills? Perhaps, I am not fully aware of the technological forecast. Does anyone have an opinion on this?
Green does not imply batteries. The current problem with energy is that the price is so high in the eu that it can’t be competitive. The conjecture is that switching to renewable sources will drop that cost significantly.
Look at Sweden. They were not aiming in decarbonization in the 90s, just increasing the energy offer (to the point it is still one of the cheapest in the EU today). They looked at the prices, natural capacities and long-term strategy and end up with a lot of Hydro, nuclear and some wind. The problem today is not that renewables are more expensive (solar and wind are cheaper than nuclear for instance), the problem is the f*cked up pricing model and the lack of offer. If we increase the offer a lot (it requires huge investment) we decarobonize together with lowering the energy prices
Carbon is not a pollutant, life is based on carbon. We breath out carbon dioxide, the plants use it to make oxygen and food for us (photosynthesis). Decarbonisation can enrich only the "elites" via new technologies under their control and via taxes on carbon.
EU is far advanced in looking after its public social civil civic systems its very visible and result oriented also its easier to manage it because of small sized compact Nations
This is all in English because we love the Irish and they didn’t bring an interpreter
🤣
back to old latin language for Unionem Europaeam 😏
Hienoa,MD on omalla paikallaan ja me tarvitsemme hänen osaamistaan,periksiantanattomuutaan ja suhteitaan koko EU: nyt,kiitos
great conversation!) thx
Interesting this report. Now it's time to realize it practically. I trust Mario Draghi a lot
Questions in Italian? How many of the 400M understood the question? This is why European unity is hard. We can’t even communicate with each other
Criminals in action
Sorry , Shen Mr.Draghy was Prime Ministre and not Monster .am sorry again for thé erreur.
YES, EUROPEAN PEOPLE 🇪🇺
32:00 "The task is now to define these common European projects"
Seriously? You had 1 year, during which you came up with 2 PDFs and just now you will be defining the projects??
No wonder with these inefficient bureaucrats EU can never catch up to the US
Get a grip, they are supposed to strategically take action year on year. What do u think this is.
And the US has double the debt than Europe carry, so don’t place ur bets just yet
ad unionem realem Europaeam, vivificamus linguam Latinam sicut Hebraei hebraicam renovabant. Non insanit, ambitiosus est! 😇💪✊
Now for the most important part... Apply it. It would be a shame if they didn't apply it after his amazing work with the report. Europe needs less regulation, make the continent startup and business friendly, and invest like crazy in silicon and technology, but the good kind, not just digitalisation.
Dear European Commissioners,
We have extremely good talents in Europe. European talents leave Europe because of a lack of investments (the EU should NOT do it) by private investors, due to regulation of work and taxes. Big companies avoid taxes, small ones do not, which makes it harder for the small ones who innovate. I am making this point simple to convey. It is an extremely bad decision to think that the EU is the solution because no investments are made by the private sector in tech. The EU should step back instead of becoming more involved. The policies seem to be purely ideological and not logical. I tend to believe this is due to ideology and maybe a bit of incompetence. However, from a logical standpoint, if we believe you are capable and unbiased in terms of ideology, these reforms are forcing states, through their debt or assets, to finance big corporations to build your vision, which ultimately gives you more power. I believe it is likely to be a mix of both, but in any case, communism ended badly, and if Europe continues on this path, it will not be much different.
Regarding european defence, I do not know if you envy the United States, but our situations are very different. A European defense would be good for independence and the defense industry, but the states should oversee it. We do not share the same 3,000 years of history. Individuals need an attachment to their history and culture.
This leads to population collapse-look at Mongolia, a model for society in that regard. If individuals do not have attachment, there is nothing to fight for.
Hence why nationalism is returning?
I am not advocating for nationalism, but people are increasingly against you. Going further in your ideology will not make things better. Listen to the people and make policies briging what they express and what is possible. Centralization without accountability to the people will lead to failure, and "common debt here is instrumental" seems to perfectly fit that description.
Sincerely,
AnotherEuropeanCitizen
Big companies avoid taxes and little ones do not? And that is the reason little companies don't invest in innovation, you believe. I'm sorry, sadly the countrary has been proven times and times again. Those are not happy results, but big companies remain the engine of nations because little ones don't have reason to invest big sums of money on research and developement, nor the expertise required...
@@dariobelardi333 various factors explain the lack of investment in innovation, but as said by the comissioners, there is a lack of investment.
The intent of the letter is to say that the causes of non-investment should be tackled and not avoided by the EU investing itslef instead of the private sector.
@@Justanother1ne Deregulation of the market? Are you out of your mind? Yeah and what do you think it will happpen in the mean time? That foreign corporations will stay there watching and allow us to grow? For the love of God, even with regulations Amazon managed to cut off a lot of our internal retail market, with no protections we will be exposed. US companies use their size for predatory acquistions. Not only, Chinese corporations use CCP's funds to beat local markets through unfair competition. Without regulations our economies will be held hostage.
Also nationalism doesn't work the way you think it does. It looses all its value once a group becomes big and diverse enough.
@@dejabu24 Despite the weird xenophobia that completely ignores the fact that the jobs occupied by immigrants in germany at the moment would be uncovered if not for them and all this while still needing more labour as of today. I agree with the rest. The EU needs to be more united, not more fragmented. The rest of the world is getting bigger, the EU can't become smaller.
Every state in the world does invest a bit. Why shouldn't EU do it?
And while taxation shouldn't be excessive to strangle businesseses, big companies, especially if foreign, cannot expect not to pay a certain sum
EU should absolutely become more involved especially on some strategic sectors, but I agree policies must no be based on ideologies.
As for the single defense, no single states meet the requirements. As an American during the Revolution said, we either hang together or we hang separately. Moreover, we do share millennia of History, which is not only war
Some bullshit, everyone knows that Europe lost the start in digital tech, we didn't need a report for that. Things move to slow in Europe
I think the report says more than the obvious, but I still haven't read it
@@NoName-hg6cc The report on the future of European competitiveness
written by Mario Draghi has been published by the European Commission. I am providing you with the website address below. As for the rest, we know why the European Union doesn't work and will never work, because the European states will never accept a complete and successful federalist project, because their interests are far too divergent. For example, France has a special link with the French-speaking world that others don't. Italy has a completely different industrial structure to Ireland, Cyprus or Malta. There are also anthropological differences in the way people relate to work. The different history of social struggles, the different degree of attachment to the notion of public service. In short, for all these reasons and more, the European Union, the federalist and pan-European project, cannot exist in this situation. This is why, as has always been the case since 1992, it will be an ever greater and more serious failure. Here is the address of the site. Good week to you. commission.europa.eu/topics/strengthening-european-competitiveness/eu-competitiveness-looking-ahead_en
The report says why we lost it and how to make up for that. If u think that that’s obvious I recommend you submit for a Nobel prize in economics
❤🇪🇺❤🇷🇴❤
European Union is a story of success. A team of European countries who have the same goal: peace, prosperity.
GREEN ECONOMY for EU it mean MORE MONEY STAY INSIDE EU.
If we make our energy , by solar, wind, water / hydro, nuclear - all green energy - all the money will stay in EU countries and we wont send the money to Arab countries, Russia, Norway, USA and UK (and these sent money to import oil and gas who pollute our air and destroy our environment!)
@@Eduard.Popa. sound very good but is not working because green energy solutions are not ready and are far more expensive than fossil fuels at this moment. The EU has started a transition without having the new technologies ready. By doing this it is killing its industry and is adding enormous economic burdens in the weakest segments of EU population.
I wanted to formulate my thoughts fully at first, but I have to now. War in Europe is not beneficial to you, no matter how much you fear Russia and do not want to throw Ukrainian corpses into the space between you and Russia. It is a huge amount of money, instability and constant change of political elites, since people are constantly dissatisfied with foreign policy and worry about the future. In Moldova, Transnistria, Georgia, Abkhazia, Ossetia it has always been like this, create a gray zone, and in Ukraine - Dobnas and Crimea, and everything will calm down. Ukraine is losing the most precious thing - life, but then you will lose Europe because of national populists. It is time to negotiate.
why does this video have only 31k view wtf
Grazie mille Fratelli e Sorelle mi avete salvato la vita ❤️
A Giant
Fair enough Mario . Well , until the Fiscal Policy will be held by single State entities , foreign companies would be only interested in coming to Europe for laundering their profits in Luxembourg or Netherlands for example, altering the EU market. Fiscal Policy and Defense Policy are two pivotal bedrocks for strengthening and enhancing our global position. It doesn’t suffice having “a more digital and green economy “
European Union is witnessing Deindustrialsation. CHINA is outpacing European Union in Industrialization & Industrial development, along with infrastructure development.
EU is crumbling 🥴
Inside sabotage
@@PingPingO9😂No, you're just doing dumb things. You literally threw away your cheap energy because no one knows lol
@@ZHEN-NING-x9c7z USA sabotage, the tribe that rules USA and Europe want this for some reason.
Great. Evolution.
Great...this is the first immediate new Deal....a bit later the second one must be introduced. Roosevelt docet ever
What the EU needs is deregulation, deregulation and more deregulation instead of more debt to finance programs designed by bureaucrats!
why?
But is it national government fault? Have you seen how much the EU regulates and national governments do?
@@mise1348 because progress comes from private initiative never from public regulations and because we don’t need more debt, we need to attract private capital and this comes with economic freedom and a good legal framework. Why do you think the unicorns escape the EU to go to US?
@@cantacann just to get a first hand opinion of how much and how bad the EU bureaucracy regulates: ask any farmer in your country what is his opinion about this subject and what he thinks about the EU regulations
@@julio5prado I lives all my life in agriculture, regulation is bad, but agriculture is deeply subsidized.
These subsidies are the cause of millions of people starving around the world.
So, mostly farmers in the EU are the cause of children dying in Africa.
The characters' personalities are enough for me to know that it is not worth following this lecture.
Implement the Plan soon without if and but
Thanks!
Grazie
Industry needs continuous energy production. Some days it will be cloudy, some days it will be rainy. Some days there won't be any wind. Besides that, while producing those solar panels, you already release CO2 into the environment (think of the amount you have to produce). An engineer could calculate the amount of m² it would take to plant those solar panels and wind turbines. You cannot depend on nature, that's why civilization had to advance so far. The only option is diverse energy production, WITH nuclear. People should face it, or our kids won't have any habitable world.
Draghi Competitiveness Report , as well as VdL " Clean Industrial Deal " , make a very important point : INNOVATION. Take Electric Tractors and Farm Equipment: Europe , like many other Countries, has no Oil & Gas , so Electric Equipment for Farms and Construction is vital , many Countries Farmers and Construction Business are paying unsustainable prices for Diesel ,etc., so Electric - Hybrid Farm and Construction Equipment is a huge business. A few € billions well allocated can create local Manufacturing, Businesses, Parts, Services and skilled Workers for local Markets and Exports .
Arianna podestà 💚🇮🇹
EU: onwards and forever upwards!
“forever upwards” buddy we’ll be lucky if we manage a year or two upwards
Following this and Ms. Meloni - will continue to do a fine job at pushing back when there are too many mandatory requirements that may compromise the republic. Draghi a steady hand- Good to see a functioning body like Italy - grapple with when to draw red lines.
Mario and Ursula made some very promising remarks, I hope the countries take their advice serious
She is corrupt
what about he??? They are all corrupt to funnel billions of taxpayers money into fraudulent circles and taking us to energetic suicidal and war
Bureaucracy and taxes approved. Simpletons.
EU forever United 🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺❤
The European Union is one of the few Countries in the World that can raise € 800 bn or € 1 Trillion and upgrade it's Manufacturing, Industrial , Financial, Skilled Workers & Machinists quality levels and outputs , change to Electric Transportation, new Heat Pumps, advance Drones, Agrivoltaics , etc. Very few Countries can do this level of upgrades and reforms . Why not do it ?
EU has no courage to compete with China on EV ,solar power ⋯so EU only writing a beautiful report without real context for future competition.
@@袁大陸 I am calmly confident that we can raise to the challenge.
@@袁大陸 When the billions start flowing into EU green reindustrialization, you might end with another insight.
What is certain is that the EU has the know how, and techs, necessary.
@@lacommission.-sitcom696
European troops invaded China grabbing its wealth and resources,prompting their people’s living standards before; now European countries only reduce their living standards to compete with China. The senile EU wants to compete with young new China not so easy.
@@errormatrix4159
In face of the III world war, European countries waste their budget on military equipment and ammunition, now they have no money to rebuild their technology industry ……
EU must have a strong economy to prove the success of our project. 🎉
What’s the answer to Batteries of EV cars and Where’s the Electric coming from when countries are NOT set up for this Even now and getting rid of them and the turbine church hats that’s around the world and EV cars that you Can’t get rid of after they can’t be rebuilt in a crash and covering the world with Field’s that you can’t have any wild animals and Farm animals too ?.
And again you CANOT recycle them either ?
Competitiveness only comes with capitalism and its rewards meaning low taxes . But also much less regulations. But also people that know how to create and compete. After decades of socialism. Those people do not exist. Everyone is now a socialist in their minds. Wants an easy job, vacations and early retirement. Europe is set to decline and that decline might now take on speed.
True socialism is you arre part of our community, you work and then you have the rights to get stuff if bad things happen , and everyone have to do that , this is not that , this is like because I was born this or that way I’m entitled to get something, also socialism is for the people of a country not for the entire world
Less taxes maybe, but not so much to damage welfare
Distribution of money that nobody has, but is created out of nothing, for things that nobody wants, for people and organizations that do not deserve it, to keep the circulation of money going.
And to bury European citizens under even more debt...
EU makes TRILLIONS
Grande Mario, un vero orgoglio italiano ed europeo!!
Vote Volt Europe if you want to have such policies implemented💪
They support increasing R&D spending to 5% of GDP and other policies he is proposing.
Give more money to the people and let them decide what they want to do with it instead of forcing people to "buy" services which the governments think are good.
L'idea, tra le righe, molto sottospoglie è questa:
sono gli Stati Uniti d'Europa.
She lost me at "cutting red tape" in the EU 😂
Dexit!
If Germany wants to become irrelevant
Without the EU, say hello to 3rd world status on the long run.
SO ONCE it’s All Digital what happens in the 1st major strikes 😤,the World goes to pot!
You have answer in EU Notice of Breach???
Breach of my personal data for many years?
Well done Draghi !
Mario Draghi sei un eroe ❤❤❤
Cover it up..fast!
C'è solo un piccolo pensiero che non mi dà pace, la paura collettiva nel dire che in Italia a completamente sbagliato la riforma della giustizia, dando più potere ai corrotti ed ai corrotti. 2 parlano di più armi ma non di più diplomazia. Viene trattato da sovrano assoluto ma siamo in una democrazia e fiero di ciò scrivo questo post. Non è tutto ora quello che luccica.
🇪🇺 thanks for making this public. EEC/EU can you make Q&A with subtitles so the rest of the World can understand the questions asked? On hoe Europe can succeed? You can start with the happy knowledge the rest of the World loves Europe and wants to be part of its rebuilding. Making all EEC/EU discussion in subtitles so we can all be part of the progress to success.
✊✊✊✅❤❤❤❤❤❤
It would be best for ursula to go to prison she has already done enough damage
No Long ខ្ញុំមិនអាចរងចាំយូរទេ
GRANDE DRAGHI !!!!! 🗽🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺
GRANDE VON DER LAYEN !!! 🗽🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺
😊😊🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰☺️☺️☺️
Act soon
❤❤🇮🇹🇩🇪🇬🇧🇺🇸🇫🇷🚤🇪🇸🇰🇷🇯🇵❤❤
you already destroyed europe in last 20 years..now same people say they will save EU. ahaha
Hai ragione guarda che commenti scrivono, la gente non ha capito un c...o !
Poi detto da un Ciccio Mela🥴
Come no, detto da te poi 😂😂😂
L'europa deve mollare gli Stati Uniti e allearsi con la Russia, e la qualità di vita migliorerebbe di molto in Europa.
Totalmente d'accordo. Ma ad una simile soluzione ci si arriverà o con la vittoria di Donald Trump o dall'unione dell'estrema destra con l'estrema sinistra unici movimenti ad oggi non ricattabili dai fondi internazionali di investimento ed unici politicamente avversi alla globalizzazione.
lets see if they will be able to realise just 50% of this
La maggior parte delle delle persone parla del suo popolo crede nelle capacità del suo paese pensare in grande vuol dire mettersi nei panni di altri paesi come un governo ed la politica cercano di susitere altre economie in difficoltà ed nella crescita il gruppo Europe si permette di avere una sua diplomazia, cerco di non fare mai dei esempi, ma guardare un TH-camr americano con i migliori prodotti che usa durante i suoi video ed guardare queste persone che parlano di un prodotto parlando inglese reputo che il mercato sarà interno non avrà possibilità in altri paesi, guardare un TH-camr asiatico o africano parlano di quello che hanno ma sapere che gli sta guardano un europeo capisco che investire soldi per il intrattenimento di qualità a sempre una buona resa, l'europa guarda le problematiche che le circondano come l'industria, l'industria sta cambiando nella vita della persona con quale precisione ed ricerca le industrie portano alla rovina di o crescita di un paese e continenti,
Finally something is going on. First time I saw the commission set a vision.
We will see now if they are somehow capable of acting with the existing corset of paragraphs.....
Either the end of the EU or the beginning
Only hurra-comments allowed here? Typical EU, far away from the people and democracy
Your comment was allowed. There are other video to spread bs and find "kameraden" to enjoy yourself with 😂
@@NoName-hg6cc argumentum ad hominem and straw man arguments do not help and are no substitutes for anything
Shouldnt innovation come from the youth just like during the last few millenias? It would be an entirely innovative type of innovation if the EU was able to come up with an innovation drive without a quantitavely important youth cohort.
Ma la Russia non doveva crollare ?
Crappy speeches, poor leaders
You go there and make a better speech, based on SUBSTANCE, of course, not hot air
Then WHY keep throwing money at Ukraine ,you can only stroke the bear SO Long and he will wake up ,when Zelenskyy is loaded too ,it seems odd TO ME his palaces have Never been hit !.
So that’s the Onlt reason we have to think about the war !.
Had we had a federation Mario's recommendations would have been swiftly implemented....
"the report is here" where?
commission.europa.eu/document/download/ec1409c1-d4b4-4882-8bdd-3519f86bbb92_en?filename=The%20future%20of%20European%20competitiveness_%20In-depth%20analysis%20and%20recommendations_0.pdf
commission.europa.eu/document/download/ec1409c1-d4b4-4882-8bdd-3519f86bbb92_en?filename=The%20future%20of%20European%20competitiveness_%20In-depth%20analysis%20and%20recommendations_0.pdf
on the Commission's website, search for "EU competitiveness: Looking ahead"
i2.res.24o.it/pdf2010/Editrice/ILSOLE24ORE/ILSOLE24ORE/Online/_Oggetti_Embedded/Documenti/2024/09/09/2024-Draghi-report-PART-A-V3.pdf
Its called "The futureof European competitiveness", look it up on Bing. Part A is a summary, 60 pages, Part B is 350 something pages long and the full version
Europe: the only States community that need to speak a foreing community language in order to comunicate. 😅 Such a shame.
Language is only a tool. The problem it is not the language used to communicate. The problems are the europeans theirself.
Still, one of the biggest economy in the world.
@@sisko212 i totally agree
@@asganawayaway exactly, and this is something we all Europeans achieved in the last 10 centuries, without any forced economical community.
@@bunktwr it's great that we've achieved that but times change. Without the union, each individual country would be too small to matter at global level. Just look at the UK and how difficult it is to even import goods. What we need is common low EU-wide taxation, unified commerce laws, similar to encourage investment in what remains one of the richest markets in the world.
👔✒🎧