@33:30 Who decides to breach a contract? It seems, to a bar card laymen, that none, without an actually right to a complaint, would, without necessity, breach a contract they intended to fulfill. If that is their case, then only apple's bring lawsuits; Especially when the contract is frustrated.
one who is in legitimate contract is one who can breach a known contractual obligation. there can be no other capable of a breach, other than they with full knowledge and agreement with any contract, fundamentally.
@@Reaction1s ah so someone can fail to uphold an agreement despite trying to fulfill it, while another can intentionally fail. does that make a difference in terms of violation? or does either constitute a breach? im sure a judge would take this into account
Have Larry Sharpe on to talk about 3rd parties. Larry Sharpe is running for governor of new york
@33:30 Who decides to breach a contract? It seems, to a bar card laymen, that none, without an actually right to a complaint, would, without necessity, breach a contract they intended to fulfill. If that is their case, then only apple's bring lawsuits; Especially when the contract is frustrated.
one who is in legitimate contract is one who can breach a known contractual obligation. there can be no other capable of a breach, other than they with full knowledge and agreement with any contract, fundamentally.
@@azza-in_this_day_and_age I was trying to say that there is breach which is with intent, and frustration which is without intent.
@@Reaction1s ah so someone can fail to uphold an agreement despite trying to fulfill it, while another can intentionally fail. does that make a difference in terms of violation? or does either constitute a breach? im sure a judge would take this into account