Y1/IB 23) Positive Externalities in Consumption and Production

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.ย. 2024
  • Y1/IB 23) Positive Externalities in Production and Consumption - An understanding behind why positive externalities in production and consumption cause market failure

ความคิดเห็น • 80

  • @hussmo371
    @hussmo371 7 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    Econplusdal is the plug🔌

  • @FuturePastPerson
    @FuturePastPerson 3 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    0:33 If only he knew how relevant that would become...

    • @lots2410
      @lots2410 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yesssss

  • @martoargoba7110
    @martoargoba7110 9 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Thank you very much for these videos, I cannot explain how appreciative i am of them

  • @charzza2802
    @charzza2802 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    this man low-key predicted covid classic dal

  • @azharsheikh8805
    @azharsheikh8805 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    This is how one must teach! Amazing!

  • @Ultravengo
    @Ultravengo 10 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Very good video! Simple but very effective explanations that even somebody who doesnt do economics understands

  • @husnaa6473
    @husnaa6473 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'll say it again... best econ teacher ever!

  • @nnbb12122
    @nnbb12122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Simple, clear and to the point! You make the subject very interesting... Thank you very much!

  • @nas8277
    @nas8277 ปีที่แล้ว

    i always try to remember to like all your videos. your explanation is solid. i really appreciate your help. carry on making more videos!👍👍👍👍👍 my way of hitting the thumbs up button is my way of wanting you to earn revenue in return for your hard work!

  • @jeminmangukiya8655
    @jeminmangukiya8655 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i like your brief explanation
    truely saying i was stuck on externalaties for few weeks and finally got out
    thank you very much
    by the way i like your british accent

  • @jdunce3560
    @jdunce3560 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks very much. You legend! Keep it up

  • @willhamilton3912
    @willhamilton3912 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing! What a legend!

  • @giannitorti3729
    @giannitorti3729 5 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    0:33 An anti-vax mum would probably mark you down

  • @kaygad8691
    @kaygad8691 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    God bless you

  • @sammarjaei2802
    @sammarjaei2802 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you!! and keep making videos!!!

  • @ciallandegrascoffey6216
    @ciallandegrascoffey6216 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    this man is a living God

  • @eloisecartwright2128
    @eloisecartwright2128 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi Dal, so sorry to bother you with this silly question. I don't understand why the social costs are greater than the private costs if these are POSITIVE externalities. Would really appreciate if you could shine a light on this situation xx

  • @NorthsidePiplup
    @NorthsidePiplup 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A video that actually really helped

  • @usman99628
    @usman99628 7 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Dal you're a wavy guy but isnt potential welfare gain more accurate than welfare loss. dont wanna question the master but thats what the cgp book says

    • @EconplusDal
      @EconplusDal  7 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      I really don't like the wording of a 'potential welfare gain'. If welfare could have been gained but isn't then it is being lost by definition! Keeping things simple is my philosophy

    • @KungFuKeni
      @KungFuKeni 7 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      uak mate dal put you in your place! Shoulda lead by your own words "don't question the master"

    • @usman99628
      @usman99628 7 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      loool who are you mate? suck out

    • @realdvgarg
      @realdvgarg 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@usman99628 yoooooooo ded

    • @mockmay2401
      @mockmay2401 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EconplusDal Sir your philosophy is saving my life

  • @karyllesoriano2957
    @karyllesoriano2957 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You're a legend

  • @malharhelmsley6897
    @malharhelmsley6897 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    very good explanation sir , thank you very very very much for making these videos

  • @sunnyhe2283
    @sunnyhe2283 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your explanation is brilliant!

  • @yosefbezabh8549
    @yosefbezabh8549 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    AMazing description . But not included that ,what the graph looks like when government take some action to regulate the market

  • @lorenzolavieri1022
    @lorenzolavieri1022 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video broooo

  • @nia-yl7lq
    @nia-yl7lq 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does the market equilibrium only take into account private costs & at 3:08 do you mean the extra unit consumed? because i thought that part was +ve externalities of consumption, just a little confused there. Other than that great videos and I love the list you put together, very helpful!

  • @yingyun1314
    @yingyun1314 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @paddywall8531
    @paddywall8531 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are the MSC and MPC equal for consumption, but not equal for production?

  • @lukepatterson9064
    @lukepatterson9064 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yo Mr Dal, my teacher taught the positive production externality the same as you have - the net welfare loss derived from the initial equilibirum on the diagram. My textbook and the graphs on google for positive production externalties is derived from Q2 though, with welfare loss extending upwards to the MPC curve... not sure who to believe

    • @tylerzhang5442
      @tylerzhang5442 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The are the same with different ways of thinking.

  • @saweera123
    @saweera123 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    why is price lower if MSC take into account external and private cost. surely it should be higher than private cost price to reflect true cost of production to society hence be charged as a higher price....or is that just for negative externalities

  • @moozzzzz
    @moozzzzz 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Does it matter if you call it welfare gain instead of loss? Because we used welfare gain in class and i'm not sure if it's correct or not...

    • @jamas3000
      @jamas3000 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      LJ Avr Basically it's welfare to be gained by increasing production. So you could say that, but personally I would go with welfare loss to be on the safer side.

    • @EconplusDal
      @EconplusDal  8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      +jamas3000 Nice reply, it is a welfare loss. Stick with that

  • @henrytaylor6881
    @henrytaylor6881 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    legend

  • @yeetushmm6073
    @yeetushmm6073 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the beginning of my economics studies. wish me luck guys

  • @shreysrivastava2553
    @shreysrivastava2553 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    you spelt externalities wrong XD thanks for all you do, mr dal!

  • @henrymorgan906
    @henrymorgan906 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Saving A LEVELS FOR ME

  • @harley7138
    @harley7138 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What’s the difference between IB22 and IB23??

  • @ekbeckett
    @ekbeckett 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Positive exteralities

  • @madrampagerz6788
    @madrampagerz6788 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Third party benefits that are ? Didn’t heard the word was it crew ????

  • @evdoku2481
    @evdoku2481 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But the marginal social cost on the graph at 6:52 is further to the right of the marginal private costs - doesn't this show that that is a negative externality because there is a greater cost to society than the private factory owner?

    • @shvetankhasal1354
      @shvetankhasal1354 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      have you got the answer to this now, cuz i wanna know!! my doubt exactly

    • @EconplusDal
      @EconplusDal  7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Shve Hasal If social cost is to the right of private cost it means that costs are lower not higher. Hence positive externality

    • @adamtaylor8990
      @adamtaylor8990 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The curve shifting to the right indicates a greater level of production of a good that provides welfare to society, this caused price (also cost if that helps) to drop thus indicating a lower price for a good that has benefits to society.

  • @shaanahmed1668
    @shaanahmed1668 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can somebody explain to me why positive externality is a market failure?

    • @EconplusDal
      @EconplusDal  9 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      ***** Remember what market failure is: the inability of the free market to allocate resources at the social optimum. Because of the extra benefits (3rd party benefits) arising from positive externalities, not enough resources are allocated to goods/services that generate them. Society is therefore losing out on potential welfare from the under-production and subsequent under-consumption of such goods/services. The fact that quantity in the free market doesn't reflect the social optimum quantity reflects the fact that there is a misallocation of resources - the definition of market failure

  • @rafiqwarrior2
    @rafiqwarrior2 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you still get a diagram right if you put MPC=MSC instead of MSC= MPC ?

    • @jennellex6774
      @jennellex6774 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah it’s the same thing 😂

    • @rafiqwarrior2
      @rafiqwarrior2 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jen X lol just making sure

  • @yes-gh2xu
    @yes-gh2xu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:07, 6:20

  • @sennyoucrswl698
    @sennyoucrswl698 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi sir, thank you for this amazing explanation. I have one question. Say if a firm has researched and developed a new medicine, should this be a production or consumption externality? I think both the production and the consumption of the new medicine cause external benefits to the society.

    • @karthagoy3142
      @karthagoy3142 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes i know what you mean but i still think it is positive externality of consumption because if the vaccines get manufactured and not used it helps Nobody.

  • @Sakib97
    @Sakib97 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it always the social curve that moves left or right?

  • @danfolo9405
    @danfolo9405 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why would positive externalities in production be social costs and not social benefits? P.s exam tomorrow!

    • @starsky7078
      @starsky7078 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +dan folo cost = firm, benefit = consumers

  • @oscariajian9347
    @oscariajian9347 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    6:43 "..by producing them we gain more benefit than costs", what does that mean?
    BTW great content, really appreciate it!

    • @abhishek17ajay
      @abhishek17ajay 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      i've the same doubt

    • @reecemcbride4804
      @reecemcbride4804 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It means the benefits to society outweigh the negative costs to producing them. For example the positive impact of taking a vaccine to protect yourself and others from illnesses, outweigh the costs of production when making them. Hope that helps

  • @max1999_
    @max1999_ 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does the msc=mpc curve ever change ?

    • @realFriedrichHayek
      @realFriedrichHayek 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Max Attwood In this example we are looking only at only the benefits of consuming/producing a good. It is fine to think about the other curve but for just positive externailites it is not needed.

    • @Account2129
      @Account2129 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      this curve only moves when drawing positive or negative externalities in PRODUCTION as the msc=mpc curve is like the supply curve( supply goes hand in hand with production just as demand goes hand in hand with consumption)

  • @eleanorconboy5519
    @eleanorconboy5519 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    you spelt externalities wrong on the whiteboard!

    • @Normaldude10174
      @Normaldude10174 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      oh my goodness. The whole video is now worthless

  • @omorrrahman529
    @omorrrahman529 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    U look like my boy zain nazar

  • @URNOTWANT
    @URNOTWANT 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do you mean by poach?

    • @vishaljain4915
      @vishaljain4915 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      steal, some firms can just offer a particular worker a higher wage if they work for their company and 'poach' that worker.

  • @BliiiiBlaaaaBluuuub
    @BliiiiBlaaaaBluuuub 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    whaaaaaaaats the difference between merit goods and positive externality?

    • @Equitybonds24
      @Equitybonds24 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      BliiiiBlaaaaBluuuub a merit good will cause a positive externality. When it's consumed welfare is gain by the consumer as well as third parties. This could be education or healthcare.

  • @gtraqs_
    @gtraqs_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    POSITIVE EXTERALITIES :p

  • @Theo-vh9iy
    @Theo-vh9iy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    daddy dal

  • @broadwall5456
    @broadwall5456 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    lowkey you spelt externalities.....

  • @peerapongwattanthaweesin8304
    @peerapongwattanthaweesin8304 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    covid