@@weilandiv8310 carlin spends like an hour on em in the beginning of King of Kings....but I'm sure a nice 3 or so hour video by these guys would be great!
The Persian way of war makes perfect sense for the wide open spaces of Asia. You're not going to change everything because of one mountainous sector on your nortwestern frontier. And even then, the Persian center held very well at Marathon (even without their cavalry), and simply got flanked and cut down. The hoplite isn't overrated but the Persians were perfectly capable of handling it. Alexander did what he did with combined arms and military brilliance, not mere heavy armor.
I'm going to nitpick a little. But from my understanding. ELAM is a language and culture isolate. They were different from Sumerians and Akkadians. But also completely different from the Iranic tribes of the north. Persians and Medes are the Iranic tribes that arrive from the north. Persians are able to settle in Elam because Assyria destroys Elam. Laying salt to their lands etc. I used to do the same for the longest time, associate ELAM with Persia. But there is actually a divide and a whole ethnical change between the 2 tnx to the Assyrians.
That's my understanding too. I have heard some people have tried to draw connections between it and Tamil, not sure if there's any truth to it or if its just Tamil nationalist hype. If it is true though I suspect it would be a case of proto-Tamil being brought India by Iranian plateau farmers, not the other way around.
@@andersschmich8600 probably Tamil nationalist hype. That reminds me of all of the Albanian nationalists claiming that they are the true Hellenes and that the word Greek doesn't appear until the modern era...
Pretty sure the iranian tribes had arrived centuries before with the horse and chariot living as semi nomads on the prephery of most of asain and Levant civilizations. They where ceolizing with them for generations starting in the bronze age as they served as boarder guard vessels, mercenaries cavery/ charioteers (just like the czars cossacks) and horse traders(they probably introduced domesticated horses and chariots and maybe even the wheel) to the urban elites. Persians belonged to the wider median civilization which was much more Levant influenced but persian culture had creolized around elam long before its fall and when it did their urban and religious culture were very much absorbed by persians making them persians compared to other Iranians like the wider medes. Like persain zoroastrianism is seen to have an elamite root. As they point out, the persians rise to empire pretty much revolved around them over throwing the later assyrians for being such jerks. Elam is assumed to be a myceanean or minoan equivalent to the persians much like the later is to the idea of the Dorian Greeks.
The Assyrians still exist as an ethnic identity. Or at least they did. They converted to Christianity some time ago and ISIS wiped them out around 2014.
The Kurds descendant from the Medes. So they are still around as well. They speak what is called the Northwestern Iranian dialect. Which is different then what people in Iran/Persia speak Farsi. Medes are mixed with Armenians, Assyrians, Jews etc. like what would happen if you lived in cities of Media. While Persians rode their horses around Iran.
At 2:38:14 you're mistaken; Megalopolis wasn't the capital of Messenia. That would be Messene, a city built under the guidelines of Epaminondas like Megalopolis after the battle of Leuctra, and whose walls Demetrius the besieger failed to get and got wounded in the process. Megalopolis was rather the only real city of the mountainous Arcadians, alongside Mantineia. The Arcadians were enemies of the Spartans themselves but were not Helotes like the Messenians, nor were they conquered by the Spartans at any point anyhow.
Regarding Arabia under Achaemenids,. The Achaemenids take over old Assyrian holding (Gerrha) which is today the Bahrain/Qatar area. Back then it was known for its gold and silver craftsmanship. Also, the Achaemenids do control Magan aka Makkan, Oman/UAE area. Which was an area for resources (Copper). In Western Arabia, the Achaemenids control Tayma in modern-day Saudi Arabia, which was a major Oasis inhabited since the Bronze Age This Tayma place actually has deep Egyptian/Jewish/Babylonian roots. The idea is trade from Egypt to Babylon, went thru Tayma and not thru Israel. Basically Nile, across the Red Sea, to Tayma, then towards Babylon.
During Alexanders time, its my understanding Rome was involved in a war with his uncle Alexander molossus of Epirus. The latter died fighting in italy and is recorded as lamenting his lot fighting in italy while alexander fought women in asia
I dont think he even fought the Romans because he would have had to beat the Samnites first they controlled the mountains of central Italy and beefed with the southern Greeks.
@@geordiejones5618 Pyrrhus fought the Romans and won, but his victories were all too "pyrrhic"--too costly. The Romans could call up troops faster than Pyrrhus could replace his own Epirotes.
Wow I like your content. Editing and narrating make your channel my favorite. Your work should be admired . You are deserve more subscriber I hope you must gain 1 Million subscriber by the end of this year. Please keep continue this type of amazing work. Your admirable hard work and deep research make you the best channel on TH-cam. But brother I am waiting for an promised video on Skanderbeg when it will come? I have a curiosity also can I ask your name? And Where are you from?
I'm pretty sure Xenophon's line about the Persians previously being good at melee combat is completely bunk, and says more about the Greeks than the Persians. First, what is "good" at melee before the Greeks? Hill tribes with taka shields and axes flinging javelins, probably, but those were light troops. Of course there was heavy infantry before the Greeks, but I think what set the Persian army apart was economy of scale. Also, Xenophon's postulation there is kind of propaganda. He's basically saying "now is our time," isn't he? He paints Persia as decadent and ready to be replaced by a newer, more vigorous empire. In fact, a Persian might make the same comment, but likely his comparison would be more about mounted cavalry and chariots than heavy infantry.
I stick with the author hans delbrück, who saw the persian armies as small elite cavalry force (calling the numbers in literature pure fantasy). If they were a great cavalry army (with bows and spears) they could have had a hard time facing an well drilled spear infantry, which a lot of self esteem bc of former victories. Bc withstanding a cavalry charge bf gun powder needed this two factors: drill and self esteem (like: will my neighbour in the formation stand or run? That deceides if i will fight or run)
Ezra is the story of the first return to Jerusalem to rebuild the temple - Nehemiah is the story of rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem - you can read them together as they used to be one book.
Pretty cool statement at around 1:28:00. Private slaves vs. Public slaves? Athenians slaves compared to Spartan Helots. With Persians owning Assyrians, Greek, Egyptians publically as subjects similar to Helots. But then those "slaves" owning private slaves of their own. So a bit deeper than just Spartans owning Helots. Because Helots didn't get to own their own slaves. This might be a bit full of holes, but actually a pretty good starting point to a pretty good frame of things.
@@johnmurdoch8534 Hey John, I just bought some of your cousin's company stock. Robert Murdoch's NewsCorp. Currently at around $24 Targetting $37. It's their financial wing that seems to be carrying the weight. Wall Street Journal, MarketWatch Investor Business Daily, Barrons, etc... These post-COVID wealthy home and stock owners think they are sophisticated now and are subscribing like crazy to all these financial publications. And apparently also voting Republican in Virginia.
@@MarkVrem rupert? No friend to me! Tucker carlson is interesting but the rest of fox news is really braindraining. Id rather eat a box of crayons than sit through tv news to be honest.
plutarchs life of artaxerxes is weird..perhaps because as thersites said hes more listing acts rather than tying it together. Demetrius as a man is more compelling than antigonus because he is far more human..he was grandiose and brilliant, usually one to see on the side of mercy in accounts related to his father's wars who gained and lost..he had many more highs and lows than antigonus and antigonus' flaws were the flaws of all the diadochi save for ptolemy, hubris and overambition. We dont hear of antigonus chasing skirt or building great weapons.
I thought "unarmored Persians" is a dispelled myth, and especially for the Persian Army not Persians, there was smaller ethnicities that apparently wore more armor. Also Herodotus states that Persians pierced the Athenian middle at Marathon, they collapsed it completely, but lost at flanks.
Been doing some reading on Wicker shields. You can take them at face value as Wicker shields, good enough to stop arrows/stones. Light to carry on fast and long marches in hot weather. etc. There actually is an alternative. Apparently, in China, there is evidence that clay was baked into the wicker shield, which would make them a bit harder. I don't see why the Mesopotamian places wouldn't also be baking clay into their shields. They loved baking clay from what we know. Having clay-hardened wicker shields for the immortals would feel more in context with the rest of their leather/metal scale armor.
@@MarkVrem Good points on the strengths of wicker shields. Of course the Persian military was perfectly fine for conquering the near east. Not every military though is built for every region, situation, and opponent.
@@seanchick5918 it looks like it comes down to the shape of the arrow or spear head. A wicker shield will stop a wide-headed hunting arrow or spearhead. The type of weapon a non- professional soldier would carry. On the other hand Greek hoplites would have specializes narrow head spears or arrows and wicker shield stands no chance
@@seanchick5918 I've read about it a couple of times but yes you are correct, separating fact from exaggeration and whatnot is super frustrating. I personally think Darius made the story up and killed the real Bardiya. Another great show from ya, thanks!!
I believe the Persian empire was much weaker than you think. When he invaded Pakistan, he encountered native Indian kingdoms, not Persian satraps. There was no trace of Persian institutions in the area that was nominally part of the Persian empire. I think they were loosing border provinces. What hapened to Trace i Europe, they just lost it. I also bet they had lost control over Northern Caucasus, parts of Central Asia...
Yeah those ottomans killing their sons is still super bad, like it’s better if the brothers kill each other because of sibling rivalry amongst royals but when a father dies it to his own children that’s just fucked
Iran is cradle of civilization throughout last 12 millennia. From jirof culture to summer , ilam and Hittite to Safavid and West is inconceivable without Iranian chronology. Iranian we’re mithraic includes Cyrus. Iran was Iran as always since yamnaya ( scathian, sarmations ,ionian and Allen’s)Iranian plateau. Persian one nomadic power of other nomads .. hittites , assyrians, sumerians . Persian had 3 capitals and first university education was built in Naishapour 1800 years ago. Another great show would be about Iranian philosophers &poets .
I feel so sorry for both of you for liking the new Dune movie; its an absolute insult for anyone who has read the series; like someone who only read Fellowship of the Ring and make Lord of the Ring has a movie, which according to the interviews, is all the "fans" of in the casts have read, as *every* character, and plotline is so very, very wrong
does it seem to you that the persian empire was better ran than the roman empire? I think the romans would have benefited very much from the satrap system.
You'd be amazed what insane assholes can accomplish when they have a good sister by their side or some bad women telling them in more and more forceful terms what they are doing wrong. Nuns for the lonely Lionheart make better Braveheart ripoffs
The Persians couldn't spur philosophy since they had none. Please cite one Persian philosophical text. The is Woke historical revisionism. The only people who could have influenced them were the Indians of the lands of Sapta Sindu but there's no connection.
I didnt like the visuals of most of the new dune. way to grey and uninspired and not weird enough. Also, way too many grand, but not particularly interesting, panning shots with dramatic tones that only work well while in a theater, and even then, usually only once.
I'm pretty interested in Persia, and I really tried, but I only made it about 10 mins before Chick annoyed me enough to quit. Good to know he's having a hard time, karma maybe. Hey Sean, you're the worst!
Just in case Sean sees that post, here's me to spin the earth back right-ways up. Sean you're the best! Also Sean, though easier said than done, be patient; 2022 will see good guys & gals bring some hope back to the world. Patience!
I would love to see a video on just the Assyrians!!!
Same. Maybe something for 2022.
Me too! Ashurbanipal was so depressed and miserable, as told in his diary. I have to know more!
@@weilandiv8310 carlin spends like an hour on em in the beginning of King of Kings....but I'm sure a nice 3 or so hour video by these guys would be great!
hell yeah
Watch some football play some Vidya and fall asleep listening to Thersites. Sundays are the best.
Miss those days
Egypt: Revolts
Persia: How many times do we have to teach you this lesson old man?!
good "joke" haha
Excellent talk fellas. A dedicated Assyrian talk would be a gift.
The Persian way of war makes perfect sense for the wide open spaces of Asia. You're not going to change everything because of one mountainous sector on your nortwestern frontier. And even then, the Persian center held very well at Marathon (even without their cavalry), and simply got flanked and cut down. The hoplite isn't overrated but the Persians were perfectly capable of handling it. Alexander did what he did with combined arms and military brilliance, not mere heavy armor.
Found your channel 2 weeks ago, really enjoy listening to it while playing Age of the Empires.
I'm going to nitpick a little. But from my understanding. ELAM is a language and culture isolate. They were different from Sumerians and Akkadians. But also completely different from the Iranic tribes of the north. Persians and Medes are the Iranic tribes that arrive from the north. Persians are able to settle in Elam because Assyria destroys Elam. Laying salt to their lands etc. I used to do the same for the longest time, associate ELAM with Persia. But there is actually a divide and a whole ethnical change between the 2 tnx to the Assyrians.
You’re correct about Elam, the Bible even distinguishes a difference between them and other nations too.
That's my understanding too. I have heard some people have tried to draw connections between it and Tamil, not sure if there's any truth to it or if its just Tamil nationalist hype. If it is true though I suspect it would be a case of proto-Tamil being brought India by Iranian plateau farmers, not the other way around.
@@andersschmich8600 probably Tamil nationalist hype. That reminds me of all of the Albanian nationalists claiming that they are the true Hellenes and that the word Greek doesn't appear until the modern era...
Pretty sure the iranian tribes had arrived centuries before with the horse and chariot living as semi nomads on the prephery of most of asain and Levant civilizations. They where ceolizing with them for generations starting in the bronze age as they served as boarder guard vessels, mercenaries cavery/ charioteers (just like the czars cossacks) and horse traders(they probably introduced domesticated horses and chariots and maybe even the wheel) to the urban elites. Persians belonged to the wider median civilization which was much more Levant influenced but persian culture had creolized around elam long before its fall and when it did their urban and religious culture were very much absorbed by persians making them persians compared to other Iranians like the wider medes. Like persain zoroastrianism is seen to have an elamite root. As they point out, the persians rise to empire pretty much revolved around them over throwing the later assyrians for being such jerks. Elam is assumed to be a myceanean or minoan equivalent to the persians much like the later is to the idea of the Dorian Greeks.
The Assyrians still exist as an ethnic identity. Or at least they did. They converted to Christianity some time ago and ISIS wiped them out around 2014.
Still plenty in Syria.
But probably more in The USA than in Iraq nowadays.
The Kurds descendant from the Medes. So they are still around as well. They speak what is called the Northwestern Iranian dialect. Which is different then what people in Iran/Persia speak Farsi. Medes are mixed with Armenians, Assyrians, Jews etc. like what would happen if you lived in cities of Media. While Persians rode their horses around Iran.
At 2:38:14 you're mistaken; Megalopolis wasn't the capital of Messenia. That would be Messene, a city built under the guidelines of Epaminondas like Megalopolis after the battle of Leuctra, and whose walls Demetrius the besieger failed to get and got wounded in the process. Megalopolis was rather the only real city of the mountainous Arcadians, alongside Mantineia.
The Arcadians were enemies of the Spartans themselves but were not Helotes like the Messenians, nor were they conquered by the Spartans at any point anyhow.
Keep up the good work!! Great historical content with humor and some real language. Can’t beat it!
Thanks for making this, I wanted to get into persian history but have almost no clue were to start.
Great topic choice!
Regarding Arabia under Achaemenids,. The Achaemenids take over old Assyrian holding (Gerrha) which is today the Bahrain/Qatar area. Back then it was known for its gold and silver craftsmanship. Also, the Achaemenids do control Magan aka Makkan, Oman/UAE area. Which was an area for resources (Copper). In Western Arabia, the Achaemenids control Tayma in modern-day Saudi Arabia, which was a major Oasis inhabited since the Bronze Age This Tayma place actually has deep Egyptian/Jewish/Babylonian roots. The idea is trade from Egypt to Babylon, went thru Tayma and not thru Israel. Basically Nile, across the Red Sea, to Tayma, then towards Babylon.
"God dammit Waffles!"
I was actually sipping from my scotch at this point in the conversation.....which ended up on my laptop screen....
Thanks.
The Babylonian exile was more important for happening than for them being freed by the Persians. So Nebuchadnezzar the Second would be more important.
During Alexanders time, its my understanding Rome was involved in a war with his uncle Alexander molossus of Epirus. The latter died fighting in italy and is recorded as lamenting his lot fighting in italy while alexander fought women in asia
"and is recorded as lamenting his lot fighting in italy while alexander fought women in asia"
Sounds like some bull shit later propaganda by Romans.
@@Rokiriko The Romans were good at bullshit and propaganda.
I dont think he even fought the Romans because he would have had to beat the Samnites first they controlled the mountains of central Italy and beefed with the southern Greeks.
@@geordiejones5618 Pyrrhus fought the Romans and won, but his victories were all too "pyrrhic"--too costly. The Romans could call up troops faster than Pyrrhus could replace his own Epirotes.
Love the content thersites
Wow I like your content. Editing and narrating make your channel my favorite. Your work should be admired . You are deserve more subscriber I hope you must gain 1 Million subscriber by the end of this year. Please keep continue this type of amazing work. Your admirable hard work and deep research make you the best channel on TH-cam. But brother I am waiting for an promised video on Skanderbeg when it will come? I have a curiosity also can I ask your name? And Where are you from?
I'm pretty sure Xenophon's line about the Persians previously being good at melee combat is completely bunk, and says more about the Greeks than the Persians. First, what is "good" at melee before the Greeks? Hill tribes with taka shields and axes flinging javelins, probably, but those were light troops. Of course there was heavy infantry before the Greeks, but I think what set the Persian army apart was economy of scale.
Also, Xenophon's postulation there is kind of propaganda. He's basically saying "now is our time," isn't he? He paints Persia as decadent and ready to be replaced by a newer, more vigorous empire. In fact, a Persian might make the same comment, but likely his comparison would be more about mounted cavalry and chariots than heavy infantry.
I stick with the author hans delbrück, who saw the persian armies as small elite cavalry force (calling the numbers in literature pure fantasy).
If they were a great cavalry army (with bows and spears) they could have had a hard time facing an well drilled spear infantry, which a lot of self esteem bc of former victories.
Bc withstanding a cavalry charge bf gun powder needed this two factors: drill and self esteem (like: will my neighbour in the formation stand or run? That deceides if i will fight or run)
Another awesome video, thanks for making such good content guys! Viva Elagabalus!
The Persians really need a new PR director for the West. Lol. They were very magnanimous and benevolent all things considered during that period
Preach
They make sure the sound quality is up for the important topics lol
Your work is fantastic. Would it be possible to add a search function to your channel, please?
Ezra is the story of the first return to Jerusalem to rebuild the temple - Nehemiah is the story of rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem - you can read them together as they used to be one book.
I plan to read them back to back in 2022
Pretty cool statement at around 1:28:00. Private slaves vs. Public slaves? Athenians slaves compared to Spartan Helots. With Persians owning Assyrians, Greek, Egyptians publically as subjects similar to Helots. But then those "slaves" owning private slaves of their own. So a bit deeper than just Spartans owning Helots. Because Helots didn't get to own their own slaves. This might be a bit full of holes, but actually a pretty good starting point to a pretty good frame of things.
2:17:07 ''God damn it, waffles.'' LOL
The guy who died in warriors was Windows from the Thing.
He just cannot get a break.
Im pretty excited about Virginia and the democrats having a rough time lol
Me too but the GOP turd that got in is no friend of the people either.
@@johnmurdoch8534 Hey John, I just bought some of your cousin's company stock. Robert Murdoch's NewsCorp. Currently at around $24 Targetting $37. It's their financial wing that seems to be carrying the weight. Wall Street Journal, MarketWatch Investor Business Daily, Barrons, etc... These post-COVID wealthy home and stock owners think they are sophisticated now and are subscribing like crazy to all these financial publications. And apparently also voting Republican in Virginia.
@@MarkVrem rupert? No friend to me! Tucker carlson is interesting but the rest of fox news is really braindraining. Id rather eat a box of crayons than sit through tv news to be honest.
@@johnmurdoch8534 yah same here if I am being honesty LOL
You should have some of your subs to join you in one of these discussions
The Gore Vidal novel Creation got me interested in the Achaemenids.
I thought arta meant righteousness.
It does in Sanskrit.
Cyrus is an uncommon but not rare first name in The USA, presumably via The Hebrew Bible.
In Old Persian it meant Truth, very much in keeping with the Zoroastrian fixation with the concept.
Seems popular in the south...
plutarchs life of artaxerxes is weird..perhaps because as thersites said hes more listing acts rather than tying it together. Demetrius as a man is more compelling than antigonus because he is far more human..he was grandiose and brilliant, usually one to see on the side of mercy in accounts related to his father's wars who gained and lost..he had many more highs and lows than antigonus and antigonus' flaws were the flaws of all the diadochi save for ptolemy, hubris and overambition. We dont hear of antigonus chasing skirt or building great weapons.
Watch the TV series "See", Jason did a pretty good job in that.
I thought "unarmored Persians" is a dispelled myth, and especially for the Persian Army not Persians, there was smaller ethnicities that apparently wore more armor. Also Herodotus states that Persians pierced the Athenian middle at Marathon, they collapsed it completely, but lost at flanks.
Do you have a book to recommend so I can investigate?
Been doing some reading on Wicker shields. You can take them at face value as Wicker shields, good enough to stop arrows/stones. Light to carry on fast and long marches in hot weather. etc. There actually is an alternative. Apparently, in China, there is evidence that clay was baked into the wicker shield, which would make them a bit harder. I don't see why the Mesopotamian places wouldn't also be baking clay into their shields. They loved baking clay from what we know. Having clay-hardened wicker shields for the immortals would feel more in context with the rest of their leather/metal scale armor.
@@MarkVrem Good points on the strengths of wicker shields. Of course the Persian military was perfectly fine for conquering the near east. Not every military though is built for every region, situation, and opponent.
@@seanchick5918 it looks like it comes down to the shape of the arrow or spear head. A wicker shield will stop a wide-headed hunting arrow or spearhead. The type of weapon a non- professional soldier would carry. On the other hand Greek hoplites would have specializes narrow head spears or arrows and wicker shield stands no chance
47:00 caligula
There's records that show Cambyses didn't kill the Apis Bull
It is disputed, like many details of the Persian kings.
@@seanchick5918 I've read about it a couple of times but yes you are correct, separating fact from exaggeration and whatnot is super frustrating. I personally think Darius made the story up and killed the real Bardiya. Another great show from ya, thanks!!
@@herbthompson8937 I am inclined to think that, particularly with Bardiya. Still, it is so frustrating with the sources.
I believe the Persian empire was much weaker than you think. When he invaded Pakistan, he encountered native Indian kingdoms, not Persian satraps. There was no trace of Persian institutions in the area that was nominally part of the Persian empire. I think they were loosing border provinces. What hapened to Trace i Europe, they just lost it. I also bet they had lost control over Northern Caucasus, parts of Central Asia...
Yeah those ottomans killing their sons is still super bad, like it’s better if the brothers kill each other because of sibling rivalry amongst royals but when a father dies it to his own children that’s just fucked
Does it*
Iran is cradle of civilization throughout last 12 millennia. From jirof culture to summer , ilam and Hittite to Safavid and West is inconceivable without Iranian chronology. Iranian we’re mithraic includes Cyrus. Iran was Iran as always since yamnaya ( scathian, sarmations ,ionian and Allen’s)Iranian plateau. Persian one nomadic power of other nomads .. hittites , assyrians, sumerians . Persian had 3 capitals and first university education was built in Naishapour 1800 years ago. Another great show would be about Iranian philosophers &poets .
If you will
I feel so sorry for both of you for liking the new Dune movie; its an absolute insult for anyone who has read the series; like someone who only read Fellowship of the Ring and make Lord of the Ring has a movie, which according to the interviews, is all the "fans" of in the casts have read, as *every* character, and plotline is so very, very wrong
does it seem to you that the persian empire was better ran than the roman empire? I think the romans would have benefited very much from the satrap system.
2:30:47 Maybe they sought more in life.
Momoa is pretty good in the Frontier tbh.
You'd be amazed what insane assholes can accomplish when they have a good sister by their side or some bad women telling them in more and more forceful terms what they are doing wrong. Nuns for the lonely Lionheart make better Braveheart ripoffs
The Persians couldn't spur philosophy since they had none. Please cite one Persian philosophical text. The is Woke historical revisionism. The only people who could have influenced them were the Indians of the lands of Sapta Sindu but there's no connection.
Virginia is easily more interesting. Persepolis has nothing on Richmond, and The Confederacy like Persia, had two capitols.
"if you will" x1000
35:07 Lmao
I really love your videos but you should stop speaking about recent USA in a Persian video
Psalms 2 and 110 are about Cyrus.
Cyrus is god's Son and Melchizedek, our ONLY link to God.
I didnt like the visuals of most of the new dune. way to grey and uninspired and not weird enough.
Also, way too many grand, but not particularly interesting, panning shots with dramatic tones that only work well while in a theater, and even then, usually only once.
i thought pkd died before the movie was released
nice
Interesting. What made the Egyptians revolt so many times against Persia?
How could you talk continously about Persians for 4 hours ^^'
How could you NOT?
Carlin talks about it for 12 hours!
There's a lot to talk about
Hi, love the content but you break it up for 1 hour casts
Poor waffles :/
Randomly found some video that started with some soys Reeeeeeeeeeing @ the begining. Epic. Cope.
Naked Celts!?!
Learning from history, alway preemptively strike no matter the situation even if it was for both shit movies that I haven’t seen. 😉
are you guys progressive democrats? I would talk about that...less.
😂😂👏
No no it’s not as bad ww84
I'm pretty interested in Persia, and I really tried, but I only made it about 10 mins before Chick annoyed me enough to quit. Good to know he's having a hard time, karma maybe. Hey Sean, you're the worst!
Just in case Sean sees that post, here's me to spin the earth back right-ways up. Sean you're the best! Also Sean, though easier said than done, be patient; 2022 will see good guys & gals bring some hope back to the world. Patience!
Thanks Mark. Made my day! :)
Lol wut?
I would thoroughly enjoy this podcast morphing into a norm one with the norm/ adam eget dynamic
Wtf? You right in the head? What is wrong with Sean? He has such a good chemistry with Thersites.
Of course he's miserable.
ALL progressives are!
TRUMP 24
UNSUBSCRIBED.
If you will