Woovebox: step-by-step guide and brief review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 81

  • @vroteg
    @vroteg หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sadly unlike you said in the video there is no physical midi in. Which is a deal breaker for many including me. Shame. As I’m looking for something like this to complement M8.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Oh, did I say that? Let's pin your comment then - thanks for pointing that out!

  • @FreeBeat
    @FreeBeat 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Great video! Love seeing other creators finally getting their hands on the Woovebox :) It's a beast of a groove box and best of all, the creator is extremely accepting of any and all feedback, and seems very dedicated to constant firmware updates. Again, great job!

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you very much! Yes, I saw your video a couple of weeks ago (everyone did). ;-)
      This is an incredible piece of musical gear, and that it's made by a single developer is just ... mindblowing. I mean, all the peripherals (how the firmware is updated, the web page, the documentation) is very well made and leaves nothing to be wished for!

    • @Congasjones
      @Congasjones 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks to you too @FreeBeat for your videos -if it wasn’t for your first one , I would never of found this amazing groovebox❤️

  • @Wooveboxing
    @Wooveboxing 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Btw here is how to quickly and easily setup a 64 step pattern:
    1. Go to the pattern page
    2. Enter the context menu by holding WRITE and pressing the encoder
    3. Select Chn. 4 and long press the encoder to validate (The Woovebox will automatically link 4 patterns together)
    4. Then I usually enter live record mode by holding WRITE and pressing PLAY, and then playing something
    Once you've done it once or twice it becomes second nature and you can also create 8 bar and 16 bar patterns. I'll have a video on that later this week if you want to see it in action!

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thanks for pointing that out! Please feel free to link your videos here for some additional audience. TH-cam is a collaborative space (the more people talk about a particular topic, the more views everyone gets)
      I'll certainly do some more videos in the future. :-)

    • @Wooveboxing
      @Wooveboxing 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mr_floydst Thank you and looking forward to your future videos

  • @thefumigator
    @thefumigator 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    FM + FX + VA + SEQ + Sampler + etc etc in such a tiny box, with midi in and out. Amazing. I'm sold

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Thanks for watching - I agree, this is just incredible. Ivo, the creator of this box, told me he invested 3 years of his life into this, pondering every line of code regarding it's impact on DSP resources.

  • @DrRSPMD2010
    @DrRSPMD2010 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    That’s really an amazing pocket synthesizer, I will order one. Thanks Floyd for your very useful video.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thanks for watching!

  • @mksln
    @mksln 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You always sell yourself short Floyd, that's a nice simple track as well as an awesome tutorial, great stuff as always! 👍

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi, thanks for your kind words. I felt I needed to drop that line so certain people know a video creator can't compose a "fire track" everytime a synth is explained. :-)

  • @Wooveboxing
    @Wooveboxing 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Awesome video!

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Awesome box! :-)

  • @_mickmccarthy
    @_mickmccarthy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That's a very powerful little device!

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching - yes, it is. The first time I noticed that playing the chords also changes all the other tracks put a huge smile on my face. :-)

  • @mk500
    @mk500 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the way you explained and presented this fun box! Very entertaining.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks so much!

  • @wiggesobk
    @wiggesobk 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice video. I will definetly rewatch this when i got my woovebox.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you! Hope it will be useful. :-)

  • @roncordell
    @roncordell 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Cool that you picked one up and it's very intriguing! While the display is limiting I get tired of peering at tiny OLED screens to read them which I can't do without glasses anyway. Also interesting commentary on how adherence to UI convention and form (once learned) makes it much easier to use - this is a perpetual challenge (I'm looking at you, Roland) for which some people have a knack for creating such user interfaces and the rest of us struggle at it. I looked at the Woovebox when folks were commenting about it on a recent video you published and was tempted then. But I have so many bits of hardware to learn and explore that I'm going to let this bit of GAS pass for now.... no, really! Seriously... (goes and checks on Woovebox availability) ;) - Whew! Safe through October at least...

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks for your comment! The maker of this box clearly has spent a lot of time thinking about the user experience and design principles. Once you grasped the general idea, you can operate it blindfolded. But man, I spent a week reading the (excellent) documentation and still had some questions.
      Oh, and I bought myself some varysight glasses last week. I can feel your pain. ;-)

    • @mksln
      @mksln 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mr_floydst Actually its interesting that you mention that it can be used without looking at it! As visually impaired musicians might be a great audience for the Woovebox in that case, as there are not many grooveboxes that can be used without looking at the user interface! and I see people with visual impairment consistently asking on forums, reddit, etc about getting modifications to allow using both computer and hardware devices for them.

  • @geoffclapp5280
    @geoffclapp5280 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's like a groovebox from the 90s squeezed into a pocket operator format. I don't really miss my MC505 lol. I think that if they could put a real display like 128/52 dot LCD and build a UI it would be worth $250. As it stands, I imagine myself trying to read a pdf on my phone to do simple things and having a bad time.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi, thanks for watching - you're not wrong there. ;-)
      It really depends on what you're looking for - using a phone to create music is possible, but ultimately frustrating because the UI is never precise enough for playing music accurately. You're right about reading a lot of documentation before getting a grasp of this instrument, though. This is one tough cookie.

  • @GazRendar
    @GazRendar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool! You've been picking up some fun new gear lately. I've been on the fence about the Woovebox since I saw FreeBeat demo it a few weeks ago. Might be a great little device that fits in somewhere between a PO-33 and an OP-Z. Definitely looking forward to seeing more videos about it before I make a final decision to buy one or not. Great break down vid. Thanks for putting in the chapters to make it easier to jump back and forth.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thanks! I saw Freebeat's video as well (I think everyone saw it) ;-)
      You're right in your assessment. This wraps all the POs into one comfortable package and then adds in even more functions.

  • @The_artist_called_The_Engineer
    @The_artist_called_The_Engineer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well I just ordered my Woovebox. I agree I don’t lie the buttons and display so my first task while I wait patiently for delivery will be to design and print a nicer front cover. Won’t fix the display but I understand that the computer interface may make up for this…

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Congrats! Well yes, the user interface is pretty sparse here. But it's really quick to learn so you can mostly use it without even looking at it.

  • @rexcellencemagee6729
    @rexcellencemagee6729 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I haven’t seen you in while Floyd! I hope you’re well! I just got the black box and Roland SH-4D so as cool as this product is, mama would would kick my tail for spending anything on what I believe to be already be the best two pieces of a work station ever made. I like the size of this and would be really handy stuck in the hospital or something like that, which unfortunately happens more often than I’d like! Oh well, as Joe Pesci said in My Cousin Vinny, I got to be honest with you, I really could use an ass kickin! lol, I am going to get one because with little effort it’s a great writing tool!

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi, thanks for watching! I hope you're doing well? Going to hospitals shouldn't be routine... And yes, this is so small and yet so packed with features, and the chord tracks are so musical.

  • @unclemick-synths
    @unclemick-synths 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Cool gadget. Seems a bit better executed than PO.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes indeed. I think the POs were a big inspiration here, but this box really takes the concept to another level.

  • @DawlessHouseMusic
    @DawlessHouseMusic 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think this is a winner.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think so, too, and man, this is well-deserved. (There is no big company behind this, it's the work of one single person)

  • @HotDumpsterCrab
    @HotDumpsterCrab 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It’s a really cool idea, but I can’t read the display and $250 is a bit too much. If it had a nice screen it would be a no brainer.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thanks for watching! I think you're right with your assessment on the screen, but I think the price is really okay. For example, you'd had to buy _all_ the pocket operators and then you'd still not be able to do all the things this box does. The chord track is the star of the show for me personally. ;-)

    • @Congasjones
      @Congasjones 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Plus it does everything! Sequence midi sampling synth etc ❤

    • @mk500
      @mk500 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This would have been SO much better if they had opted for 14 segment display modules instead of 8 segment; and it wouldn’t have ruined the aesthetic. And they have the budget at $250.

    • @bornach
      @bornach 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      And the nice screen didn't waste half the real estate on cutesy animations of sewing machines, submarines, factories, etc

    • @HotDumpsterCrab
      @HotDumpsterCrab 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mr_floydst That’s true. I do still want one, but I’m visually impaired so I’m afraid it’ll be too difficult for me to navigate. Would you say you can get along with using only muscle memory like with a pocket operator?

  • @cooksoni.a
    @cooksoni.a 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WOW. This is look AMAZING. I want to buy it, and I want listen to the music and dance the night away. Okay?

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching - I'm afraid I just handed out the last dancing permit for today and now I'm closing my office. ;-)

  • @firstandlast4415
    @firstandlast4415 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @0:20 love your impression of Cuckoo. 🙂

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching! Ah yes, I love Cuckoos videos. Wasn't aware I lifted that from him (not intentional) :-)

    • @firstandlast4415
      @firstandlast4415 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Love the Computer World Kraftwerk type music by the way. Great video.

  • @nerddub
    @nerddub 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    looks pretty cool, and feature packed for its size; although deciperhing the UI via 7 segment displays is pretty terrible to the uninitiated, an OLED with readable text prompts would be much better, IMO

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're right, that would have been helpful. But learning the UI is quickly done due to it's strict design principles. You can navigate it eyes closed after an hour or two.

    • @nerddub
      @nerddub 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mr_floydst nice, thanks for the reply!

    • @41Vega
      @41Vega หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think it’s cost cutting, adding an OLED screen to this would jump up the price a bit I would think.

  • @Congasjones
    @Congasjones 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi great video and cool to see some love for this outstanding groovebox-what was the set up for the midi? Thanks

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi, thanks for watching! It was just Woovebox MIDI OUT into PEAK MIDI IN. The Rolands just stood around there for occasional button mashing. ;-) (Audio daisy chain: Woovebox->S1->J6->ZOOM R20 recorder)

    • @Congasjones
      @Congasjones 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mr_floydst thanks

  • @arcanics1971
    @arcanics1971 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting little box of wonder. Not for me, but fascinating all the same.
    Also, hey there wee yella sub! You the boat of boogie!

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I placed it there for you to spot. Perhaps I should turn this into a challenge in my upcoming videos ;)

  • @AppliedCryogenics
    @AppliedCryogenics 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Not cryptic enough. Needs one LED and one button, with a morse code UI

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well, you're not going to believe this :-) th-cam.com/video/Z3t94ceMHJo/w-d-xo.html

  • @zdravkodimitrov
    @zdravkodimitrov 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the Deluge all over again, but with 1/10 of the buttons. As the makers of that groovebox learned, a small full rez screen makes all the difference.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Judging from viewer comments so far, the screen seems to be the biggest point of concern...

  • @Hakucho64
    @Hakucho64 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I see you like Massive Attack, Pink Floyd, etc. Have you listened to Faithless? They're more than just "God is a DJ". Try their album Outrospective.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have listened to all their albums so many times. Oh. Snap. There goes my Baseball Cap. ;-)

  • @Alex23092709
    @Alex23092709 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:45 Not LC, but LED display

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're right, obviously! Thanks for pointing that out.

  • @kolajam1143
    @kolajam1143 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MIDI IN and Out 3.5mm jack ? ?

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      3.5mm MIDI out, plus Bluetooth MIDI in/out.

  • @mohawkmikeandfriends2257
    @mohawkmikeandfriends2257 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cute device but the price and display are deal breakers for me. Even if it had a small oled it would be tempting but probably a pass from me. I am.not a fan of menu diving workflows and I would get fristrated way before i had something usable. Still great to see a new product come out with this many features, but would need to be half the price for me to get my wallet out. Im way too cheap for this to just be a curiosity/toy

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching! I think the screen is a reason of concern for most people in this comments section. The menus here are absolutely flat, though, there is no "diving" needed: One button=one function. But it's a steep learning curve at first for sure.

  • @gctechs
    @gctechs 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wish they would stop using these 7-segment displays in the music gear, once and for all. A version with an OLED screen and two encoders please.

    • @humfreee
      @humfreee 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yup, I'm really hoping this is a success so that they make "Woovebox XL" with a better UI because the sequencer/synth/sampler functionality that's packed into this device is unmatched by existing grooveboxes.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi, thanks for watching. You're right, a bigger screen would make things easier a lot. (Though -as I said in the video- after some days, you don't look at the screen anymore because the workflow follows the same guidelines whereever you are)

  • @bigbizz118
    @bigbizz118 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just a p033 but instead of giving me something different you give me the same thing. Just could have gave it a old Nokia screen

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching my TH-cam video! ;-)

  • @clown134
    @clown134 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how do people justify this price? it's like 30$ worth of actual hardware .. for 250$
    like at what point does a 500% profit margin become ridiculous?

    • @clown134
      @clown134 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and before some keyboard warrior flames me or whatever , I understand labor is involved in this process, but if it were sold for something like $80 they could sell a million of these things to people who would love them make just as much money and be able to give the product to so many more people rather than just privileged TH-camrs and established artists

    • @clown134
      @clown134 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it's just obvious who the intended target market is, for a product which would obviously be of great value for like, amateur hobbyists rather than TH-camrs who can fit 300$ into their budget for a quirky toy

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Hi, thanks for watching!
      This box was developed by one person only over the course of over 3 years, and he wrote all the software from the ground up. The value is not in the hardware, but in research and development. So for example, let's assume a programmer earns $60k a year, that's $180k to recoup. So roughly 1000 devices need to be sold to break even. That's only a quick and dirty calculation ;-)
      Plus you really need to compare it to other devices in that price bracket. You'd need to buy 3 or 4 Volcas for example and then you'd end up with a cluttered desk, a lot of cables, lesser sequencers and lower polyphony.

    • @mr_floydst
      @mr_floydst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I can understand your frustration and I can understand that $250 is a lot of money and not everyone can throw that amount of cash at a seemingly toylike looking music gadget. Thing is, despite is miniscule looks, this is really not a toy and I hope my video shows why. The next best thing to compare this to is the Novation Circuit tracks, which costs $350, and that instrument is lacking many of the functions the Woovebox has.
      If you have the time, you can build MicroDexed: th-cam.com/video/ZFvrbFw_cPg/w-d-xo.html - this will land in the price bracket you're thinking of and is equally tiny and portable (if you 3D print the case)

    • @mikolasstrajt3874
      @mikolasstrajt3874 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Software development is hard. This thing clearly has barebones hardware but very powerful and sofisticated software which was a lot of work to put together.
      Also - even with barebones hardware it's probably bit more expensive than 30$.