one thing I found interesting was the feb 2022 NATO trained army of Ukraine numbering 160,000 men (considered the best trained army in europe who could take out any european competitor) who were poised to launch their pre announced rolling offensive against the Donbass (who had legally expressed their right to self determination under UN charter article one) lasted three weeks against a Russian army of 44,000 plus the Donbass Militias who basically provided the infantry in the back of the APCs. What Russia did was intervene under UN charter article 5 which is why they call it the SMO - using NATOs theft of Kosovo as the precedent, though Kosovo didn't get to vote on the matter. Ukraine is now on NATO trained army number four according to the experts in these things and the NATO training isn't working because we have a combined arms doctrine (even though we have forgotten how to do it) and Ukraine lacks air and firepower superiority without the ability to achieve an anti air umbrella. Every bright Idea it has had has been flipped back against them by a factor of ten. In the 80s Ukraine had close to 80m inside its borders. now it has around 21m left, most of whom are ethnic Russians so the wests desire for a forever war to emulate the terror campaign in the 1950s when the CIA reactivated the Galen networks is unlikely to happen. Russia will take what it wants as a buffer then leave the debt ridden ungrateful western part for the EU to deal with. My worry is the azov/right sector types will use all those stolen arms to strike into the EU - as the saying goes 'to see who the west will fight next - look at who they are arming now.'
I think the reasons the Germans gave for not suppling the Taurus Missile system to be used in Ukraine was that they would have to have people on the ground helping to deploy them.
Of course we have got British troops in Ukraine, under the guise of " Advisory force" Much like when i was in the " mob " back in 70's, the Vietnam war..we had troops there , mainly , Australian, but we played an "Advisory role" ??? You can believe what you want???
It would be refreshing to think old soldiers studied history and realised Russia had a legitimate claim to Crimea, the citizens voted to stay with R. Indeed they formed local militia groups to repel any approaching Uks. The predominantly Russia enclavs of Lugansk etc fought off ruthless attacks resilting in the deaths of 14000 citizens. Till 2022 nato spent $$$ building immense fortifications, also reason R has moved so slowly. The financial mile in London wants R's treasure house of natural resources, simple as that. The 500k dead young men mean nothing to them. Oh and the Maidan coup was orchestrated by the west in 2014.
You forgot Ukraine lost in 2014, thousands of ukrops and Nato troops were surrounded in DEBALTSEVO. The ukrainians talked peace Russia wanted them to sign minsk agreements , which they reneged on.Germany and France were guarantors and failed to get Ukraine to sign it and played fo time and nato tried to rebuild their army.
You've joined this unnecessary conflict well after the blue touch paper was 🔥the agreement of not one inch east when the soviet union rolled out of eastern Europe, and finally the US & UK removing the democratic government if Ukraine.
Both wars are being orchestrated by the same group. Zelenski is not Ukrainian and I am sure he understands why Ukraine now plays second fiddle to the greater Is rail project.
In or out of the EU, our special force boys enjoy an open border policy. Ask no questions. They will tell you no lies. 😉😉 They go where we send them. May they never be captured. Live to tell many story's in the pub. Amen.
First year of the war the UK SAS was training troops behind the frontline and the Russians used glide bombs to target the large grouping of troops apparently the UK SAS suffering KIA and WIA should be simple to confirm by visiting the SAS cemetery in Hereford (I’m sure it’s open to the public) although there are ways to hide the fact ie: training accidents etc
I totally agree with having advisers over there, if they are there. But I don't think we should commit to sending troops on the ground, so to speak. I hope both sides see sense soon and start some sort of cease fire, as too many troops are dying on both sides. Great chat 👍. I hope you are well Keith.
The war was nearly over 2 years ago but Boris Johnson travelled to Kiev and passed on orders from America to keep fighting. The Ukrainians should have had more sense than to trust the Americans and perfidious Albion.
Crimea is ethnically Russian and only became a part of Ukraine during the USSR period. Crimea would probably still be Ukrainian were it not for the Ameican led Maidan Coup.
@@garagenigelwhat are you talking about ukraine was the most powerful nato backed army in Eastern Europe and they couldn't get it plz explain to me how any nato force could get it?
@@garagenigelnope because if they thought the could…which the can’t…they would have done it already. You cannot have it both ways it doesn’t work like that…
Around 6 months ago, Russia released casualties numbers of foreigners fighting for the UA. Can't remember exactly, Poles were at the top of the list over 1K, and the US was 3rd or 4th with around 500 gone, overall, around 45% of foreigners were no more according to data Russia provided then. So it is more than safe to say, that NATO forces are on the ground in UA. In the Kursk invasion, percentage of foreign fighters was even higher than before. Lot of Polish, US, French soldiers got on that list.
There are no doubt specialists on the ground but not as many as some would like to imagine. Uk simply cannot afford to have its SF slaughtered in a war that is already lost.
At the beginning Russian Intel was bad, very bad. Even so the Russians now have the largest and most battle hardened military in the European theatre. Everything NATO threw at it has been destroyed has the British Army even got any rifle ammunition left. 🤣
@@inthearea63 lol are you joking me?, Nato got rid of how many russian soldiers?, tanks?, APCs? and and Aircraft?, without ever having to do it themselves, plus they cleared out lots of old stock from storage and had it put to use, russia will never recover.
John The problem has been the poor Russian infantry having to fight with shovels. There's another total bollocks, made up load of crap, but you can use it if you like.
The UK has around 800 men on the ground. Every 'special' unit is there both for training and many have been active. There has been losses and the training has been complained about as being a bunch of airsofters.
Who got the US involved with Cuba? JFK - democrat Who got the US involved in Vietnam? LBJ - democrat. Who was arming the Mujahadeen at the start of the Russian invasion of Afghanistan? The peanut farmer - democrat. Ditto for the clusterf**k with Iran in 1979. How many wars did the US get involved in between 2016-20? Granted, Bush x2 got involved in wars, but Iraq did invade Q8 and there was 9/11, so there was provocation.
It was the American Stinger missile that brought the end for the Russians in Afghanistan a few years later NATO forces were there fighting the same enemy, The Oss trained and equipped Ho Chi Minh Viet Mihn on the promise of Vietnamese Independence if he helped America drive the Japanese out of South Asia,, after the second world war with the help of the British and Japanese the French took back control of Vietnam but Ho and Giapp were having none of that and decimated the French forces at Dien bein Phu Ho took the North and the Americans stepped up aggression from the South and those B52s dropped twice the amount of ordinance on the North of Vietnam than was dropped by allied forces in Europe during the Second World War possibly over 1,5 million civilians killed and not to mention their illegal raids on Cambodia, Ukraine was the result of Americas panicked withdrawal from Afghanistan, Putin saw the green light and went in, Who knows it could still lead to all-out War and Both British and the American government are playing with fire,The same as the Americans did in Vietnam with both Ho and Giapp.
NATO can't officially put troops into Ukraine for obvious reasons. The only organisation that could potentially bring the fighting to some sort of end is the UN but we've seen many failed efforts by the UN in the past (the Former Yugoslavia to name one) that have been utterly brushed aside by the two, or more, warring factions. The fact that Russia is one of the permanent members of the UN Security Council makes any vote to use UN troops to secure peace in Ukraine extremely difficult as they will just use their veto to block any such move. Yes, NATO was directly involved with the war in Afghanistan (2001 - 2021) but that was under the banner of the war on terrorism and not directly attacking a sovereign nation.
Thing is keith, Russia didn't have much choice but to invade Ukraine. A lot the satelite countries became members of NATO as you've mentioned before in prevoius vid's... It's a tough one this mukker...
BS if you believe Russian propaganda, then you don’t have a mind of your own. Ukraine was becoming more prosperous for its size, geographical and population. That’s why they invaded the industrial and agricultural part of Ukraine and try to cut it off from its export market by capturing the coast.
@@petersone6172 ukraine is run by nazis i dont suppose you belive that either, but the thing is you obvs belive the western propagander, and russia invaded to rescue citizens of donbas who were being murdered by the ukrainians back in 2014 up until the sop, then they (ukraine) went into kursk and murdered some more, but of course being a beliver of western propagander you wouldnt know that.
@@petersone6172Please know your fact's. In the east of Ukraine resides a very large Russian speaking population that saw themselves as Ukrainian, for many years during the 2000's, until 2014 they had no choice but defend themselves from the brutality of Ukrainian armed forces by trying to force them reject their customs and way of life. Online are interviews of a former senior commander stated that their orders were to destroy the population in Dotnesk, Dobass etc etc. There are other interviews from other personnel's saying the evidence.
It's often said God is "all seeing and all knowing" do you know what else is all seeing and all knowing? The intuition. Also this is where knowledge of God comes from because it takes a miracle otherwise and those can't be easy to do.
So I have to look into history during the Spanish Civil War there were international brigade and sum were on the right it happens when you have a war of this type movies are on the left though an international brigade has been formed by those who are in brackets on the right unfortunately warfare and politics never mix well both sides use the captured personnel their own advantage in the said makes good read
This is not new news ! The UK has been training Ukrainian troops in Ukraine since 2022. The long range missiles cannot be launched without our satellite data which is why a red line will be crossed if they do. Whatever training we have given them has not worked, the war is lost !
My opinion seems to have upset 1 or more contributors to your channel. If at anytime you want me to “do one” as I have been told at least once after this video, I will without prejudice.
The west has been fighting against Communism for over 100 years in one form or another , and better men have fought against it and lost unfortunately , thats my take on it for what its worth ! Thank you . God bless . x
Ukraine has faught russia over 10 years keith. Started in 2014 with invasion of crimea. It is a war. I had a friend in ukraine was bomed out of her apartment by russian missile, ljved on streets many months. Last i heard was livi nd in the bombed out apartment in kharkov its 30 miles from russian boarder. Not much is left standing in her city now even hospitalz were attacked. There are some uk forces in ukraine but as advisors and trainers i believe at the moment. Its not a hot war for us yet. Hope it helps
No, it started with the American led coup which removed the legally elected Ukrainian government. Crimea jumped ship from Ukraine after that. There is an intercepted telephone converstation between Victoria Nuland and the US Ambassador to Ukraine talking about who they would put in their puppet government. The intercept is confirmed as real with Nuland calling it a great piece of espionage. Ukraine is losing the war and America and NATO are losers and Nuland was sacked from the State Department earlier this year.
Every war has its “ developments “ in technology and tactics. Britain will have had troops in virtually every conflict around the world as “ advisors” or “ observers”. This is how the British army stays abreast of developments and at the forefront of inovations and how it gets an accurate assessment of the situation on the ground in order to report back to the politicians so that they can stay informed and be prepared to adjust political policy. To think that the biggest war in Europe is taking place since the Second World War and that Britain doesn’t have “ boots on the ground “ would, in my opinion be very nieve. I just wish the west was doing more.
Perhaps the question shouldn't be have we got troops in Ukraine but rather why they are there? One interesting theory is lithium. Not the Nirvana track but the vital ingredient for all those wokemobiles - Teslas etc. The WEF doesn't want China then Putin to have such control over lithium supplies. It spoils all their crooked little con schemes about a climate catastrophe. Follow the money ... Thanks for opening another interesting topic for discussion.
there are reports and some footage of uk,us and french special forces corpses having been identified during mop up operations in Kursk these unfortunates in most cases were not even told they were going there until last minute. THere is suggestion that they were scarificed for political gain in order to keep the support coming .
Keith , you’re normally always right in what You say , another good video once again . However I am disappointed in some people’s comments about what they are saying . To summarise , some people ( fair does its thier opinion ) but they are appeasing the Russians . Appeasement doesn’t work .
The North Koreans (or the Charley Chans) haven't fought their own shadows since the 50s and 60s, let alone fought ANY Western forces since, either. Oh, and a small number of British lads gave them both a bloody good pasting back then, too.
@bl123-w8l It doesn't mean its infantry bods are any real use, though. Any country that HAS to rely on such weapons to "win" anything isn't much cop at all, really, is it?
Picking a fight with a nuclear power on its doorstep is an act of profound stupidity !
JFK speech June 10, 1963
He says exactly that
Nothing will happen. At alll.
Just like that, am I a genius like you, or are there so many fools in this world that people don't believe it?
@greengoblin144 , and if it does, you wouldn't know cause you'll be dead instantly 😂😂😂
@@greengoblin144 a recent quote from president Putin ….( not verbatim )
“ if NATO goes too far , WE WILL ALL DIE “
And our (NATO mercs) losses are high, we really have no business being there.
So you are saying Russia do have a point to be in Ukraine ?
@@javidjames3319 Indeed..
@@javidjames3319they have their reasons.
@@javidjames3319they have their reasons.
@@FreethoughtsOnlineI think We shall have to agree to disagree and leave at that .
They call them advisors/technicians I believe.
Andrew Bridgen admitted it in an interview that British troops are operating the Storm Shadow system
one thing I found interesting was the feb 2022 NATO trained army of Ukraine numbering 160,000 men (considered the best trained army in europe who could take out any european competitor) who were poised to launch their pre announced rolling offensive against the Donbass (who had legally expressed their right to self determination under UN charter article one) lasted three weeks against a Russian army of 44,000 plus the Donbass Militias who basically provided the infantry in the back of the APCs. What Russia did was intervene under UN charter article 5 which is why they call it the SMO - using NATOs theft of Kosovo as the precedent, though Kosovo didn't get to vote on the matter.
Ukraine is now on NATO trained army number four according to the experts in these things and the NATO training isn't working because we have a combined arms doctrine (even though we have forgotten how to do it) and Ukraine lacks air and firepower superiority without the ability to achieve an anti air umbrella. Every bright Idea it has had has been flipped back against them by a factor of ten.
In the 80s Ukraine had close to 80m inside its borders. now it has around 21m left, most of whom are ethnic Russians so the wests desire for a forever war to emulate the terror campaign in the 1950s when the CIA reactivated the Galen networks is unlikely to happen. Russia will take what it wants as a buffer then leave the debt ridden ungrateful western part for the EU to deal with. My worry is the azov/right sector types will use all those stolen arms to strike into the EU - as the saying goes 'to see who the west will fight next - look at who they are arming now.'
Clueless!
I think the reasons the Germans gave for not suppling the Taurus Missile system to be used in Ukraine was that they would have to have people on the ground helping to deploy them.
Of course we have got British troops in Ukraine, under the guise of " Advisory force"
Much like when i was in the " mob " back in 70's, the Vietnam war..we had troops there , mainly , Australian, but we played an "Advisory role" ???
You can believe what you want???
We and the Americans had plenty of "Advisors"back in Vietnam.
Some days they dropped a hundred tons of :advice"...
The question should be "Why would anyone think we didn't have boots in Ukraine"? You can bet your beret we have people in there right now!
The UK needs to stop following America off a cliff.
100% 💯
The UK can think for itself
Agree 100 percent mate,
All Europe following each other like sheep !
Baaaaaaa
@@allanxxxxxxxx No it can't.
It would be refreshing to think old soldiers studied history and realised Russia had a legitimate claim to Crimea, the citizens voted to stay with R. Indeed they formed local militia groups to repel any approaching Uks. The predominantly Russia enclavs of Lugansk etc fought off ruthless attacks resilting in the deaths of 14000 citizens. Till 2022 nato spent $$$ building immense fortifications, also reason R has moved so slowly. The financial mile in London wants R's treasure house of natural resources, simple as that. The 500k dead young men mean nothing to them. Oh and the Maidan coup was orchestrated by the west in 2014.
All fact's are spot on.👍
Spot on. Rare to see it put so succinctly. Shame more people aren’t aware.
You forgot Ukraine lost in 2014, thousands of ukrops and Nato troops were surrounded in DEBALTSEVO. The ukrainians talked peace Russia wanted them to sign minsk agreements , which they reneged on.Germany and France were guarantors and failed to get Ukraine to sign it and played fo time and nato tried to rebuild their army.
The power of western msm
I made a similar comment but the censor was at work. 👍
You've joined this unnecessary conflict well after the blue touch paper was 🔥the agreement of not one inch east when the soviet union rolled out of eastern Europe, and finally the US & UK removing the democratic government if Ukraine.
The censor is at work again. 🤐
Great Keith 👍
Why would we want to deploy NATO nukes on the Ukraine/Russia border ? This would give Putin only minutes to decide to launch or not !
Those who started the war (America) wanted to destroy Russia and steal its vast mineral wealth.
This is why NATO want Ukraine....the good news is, it's all falling apart quite spectacularly.
NATO also wants regime change in Russia so they can break up the Russian Federation and take all their natural resources.
Totally agree with you keep making these great commentaries.
Of course we will have people there on advisory duties and training
Lol and the rest
North Korea sent advisors too
Tbh we are at war already
Great Vid as usual. and you are spot on.
What is it with The British that they will go anywhere in the world to get into a war??
Unfortunately in this case Britain is once again fighting on ´the side of evil. 🙁
No idea why we are no pro notsi at the moment. All this support for kiev and tel Aviv is disgusting.
Both wars are being orchestrated by the same group. Zelenski is not Ukrainian and I am sure he understands why Ukraine now plays second fiddle to the greater Is rail project.
In or out of the EU, our special force boys enjoy an open border policy. Ask no questions. They will tell you no lies. 😉😉
They go where we send them. May they never be captured. Live to tell many story's in the pub. Amen.
First year of the war the UK SAS was training troops behind the frontline and the Russians used glide bombs to target the large grouping of troops apparently the UK SAS suffering KIA and WIA should be simple to confirm by visiting the SAS cemetery in Hereford (I’m sure it’s open to the public) although there are ways to hide the fact ie: training accidents etc
@@zaynevanday142 . So how do you think or know that then lad???? Hummmm"
@@JayMac-gh1kxdid I just trigger you Son ? 😂
@@zaynevanday142 I think you did 😊👍
I would say yes , but maybe some Special Forces, or SAS
I totally agree with having advisers over there, if they are there. But I don't think we should commit to sending troops on the ground, so to speak. I hope both sides see sense soon and start some sort of cease fire, as too many troops are dying on both sides. Great chat 👍. I hope you are well Keith.
NONSENSE....
North Korea sent advisors
Royal marines have been in Kyiv for years it's common knowledge
The war was nearly over 2 years ago but Boris Johnson travelled to Kiev and passed on orders from America to keep fighting. The Ukrainians should have had more sense than to trust the Americans and perfidious Albion.
@@ShadowBlack-vh5ed
So what?
Yes, and UK probably has the most SF there.
I think the yanks,poles, Czechs and Estonians will beg to differ!
Ally Deployment Yes All Sorts ,Totally We have eyes ears and physical presence on the ground
As if he's walking about with a beret on😅
A few Russain bots on here loving your chat
👍🤣
I'm no intelligence expert, but if the Storm Shadow missile is in theatre, then UK have UK trained personnel there as well. Specialised piece of kit.
Same as the Patriot system.
They're operated by "contractors'... apparently.
Will the UK never learn russia will never let them have crimea
Crimea is ethnically Russian and only became a part of Ukraine during the USSR period. Crimea would probably still be Ukrainian were it not for the Ameican led Maidan Coup.
NATO could take it tomorrow if NATO wanted to Putin knows it!
@@garagenigelwhat are you talking about ukraine was the most powerful nato backed army in Eastern Europe and they couldn't get it plz explain to me how any nato force could get it?
@@garagenigel
NATO knows that if it puts one official foot into this conflict it will be crushed. This is not the 70s, the world has moved on.
@@garagenigelnope because if they thought the could…which the can’t…they would have done it already. You cannot have it both ways it doesn’t work like that…
Around 6 months ago, Russia released casualties numbers of foreigners fighting for the UA. Can't remember exactly, Poles were at the top of the list over 1K, and the US
was 3rd or 4th with around 500 gone, overall, around 45% of foreigners were no more according to data Russia provided then. So it is more than safe to say, that NATO
forces are on the ground in UA. In the Kursk invasion, percentage of foreign fighters was even higher than before. Lot of Polish, US, French soldiers got on that list.
The UK trained the northern alliance in ambush tactics in crickhowell in the 80s.
There are no doubt specialists on the ground but not as many as some would like to imagine. Uk simply cannot afford to have its SF slaughtered in a war that is already lost.
Slaughtered?
Are you a civvy?
That’s not a word we would use in a conversation.
I followed the narration. And I'm full of respect for you in presenting information without miring it with political/ideological/ethnic bias.
Yes my grandson has just gone in, 6 mounth telephone silence. I have ex military friends going in soon
A thousand days into a twelve day special operation, time tables a little out.
At the beginning Russian Intel was bad, very bad. Even so the Russians now have the largest and most battle hardened military in the European theatre. Everything NATO threw at it has been destroyed has the British Army even got any rifle ammunition left. 🤣
@@inthearea63 lol are you joking me?, Nato got rid of how many russian soldiers?, tanks?, APCs? and and Aircraft?, without ever having to do it themselves, plus they cleared out lots of old stock from storage and had it put to use, russia will never recover.
@@inthearea63 no bites yet Ivan!
John
The problem has been the poor Russian infantry having to fight with shovels. There's another total bollocks, made up load of crap, but you can use it if you like.
@@garagenigelhe’s right I thought it was 3 days. As quoted by General Milly.
I’m sure to buddy! Keep these uploads coming much enjoyed😊 regards to you and Tracer❤😊❤😊God bless.
The UK has around 800 men on the ground.
Every 'special' unit is there both for training and many have been active.
There has been losses and the training has been complained about as being a bunch of airsofters.
Nato will have had "observers" there from day one. Who those observers are you can draw your own conclusions about that
We've had 350 royal marines in and out of Ukraine for the last two years years!
Our kids will be going if Trump wins the US election tomorrow
Who got the US involved with Cuba? JFK - democrat
Who got the US involved in Vietnam? LBJ - democrat.
Who was arming the Mujahadeen at the start of the Russian invasion of Afghanistan? The peanut farmer - democrat.
Ditto for the clusterf**k with Iran in 1979.
How many wars did the US get involved in between 2016-20?
Granted, Bush x2 got involved in wars, but Iraq did invade Q8 and there was 9/11, so there was provocation.
IF they are there, then it'll be on an advisory basis.
IF? LMFAO
It was the American Stinger missile that brought the end for the Russians in Afghanistan a few years later NATO forces were there fighting the same enemy, The Oss trained and equipped Ho Chi Minh Viet Mihn on the promise of Vietnamese Independence if he helped America drive the Japanese out of South Asia,, after the second world war with the help of the British and Japanese the French took back control of Vietnam but Ho and Giapp were having none of that and decimated the French forces at Dien bein Phu Ho took the North and the Americans stepped up aggression from the South and those B52s dropped twice the amount of ordinance on the North of Vietnam than was dropped by allied forces in Europe during the Second World War possibly over 1,5 million civilians killed and not to mention their illegal raids on Cambodia, Ukraine was the result of Americas panicked withdrawal from Afghanistan, Putin saw the green light and went in, Who knows it could still lead to all-out War and Both British and the American government are playing with fire,The same as the Americans did in Vietnam with both Ho and Giapp.
We have been there for some time
Brilliant video
Many was there in 2014
NATO should stop “poking the Russian bear” it might bite 💀💀
It might lick your hand and sniff your fanny!
It's tried to bite Ukraine since 2014. So being a simp
@dylanandmolly3739 😂😂
Yes they’re there but for op sec I’ll say no more.
NATO can't officially put troops into Ukraine for obvious reasons. The only organisation that could potentially bring the fighting to some sort of end is the UN but we've seen many failed efforts by the UN in the past (the Former Yugoslavia to name one) that have been utterly brushed aside by the two, or more, warring factions. The fact that Russia is one of the permanent members of the UN Security Council makes any vote to use UN troops to secure peace in Ukraine extremely difficult as they will just use their veto to block any such move. Yes, NATO was directly involved with the war in Afghanistan (2001 - 2021) but that was under the banner of the war on terrorism and not directly attacking a sovereign nation.
I wonder how many actually know the max age they can be recalled under Section 68 ;)
I would rather go to prison than fight for the new British values of ana-lism and turning sko-ol kids into transformers.
So the legend about english bad teeth is true...
We do have the men in black out there m8!!
Im sure we have assets on the ground even if its just for intel.
Thing is keith, Russia didn't have much choice but to invade Ukraine. A lot the satelite countries became members of NATO as you've mentioned before in prevoius vid's... It's a tough one this mukker...
BS if you believe Russian propaganda, then you don’t have a mind of your own. Ukraine was becoming more prosperous for its size, geographical and population. That’s why they invaded the industrial and agricultural part of Ukraine and try to cut it off from its export market by capturing the coast.
Oh really..! I don't believe in Russian propoganda and I DO have a mind of my own Thank you.
@@petersone6172Ukraine becoming more prosperous, I think you mean blackstone are .
@@petersone6172 ukraine is run by nazis i dont suppose you belive that either, but the thing is you obvs belive the western propagander, and russia invaded to rescue citizens of donbas who were being murdered by the ukrainians back in 2014 up until the sop, then they (ukraine) went into kursk and murdered some more, but of course being a beliver of western propagander you wouldnt know that.
@@petersone6172Please know your fact's.
In the east of Ukraine resides a very large Russian speaking population that saw themselves as Ukrainian, for many years during the 2000's, until 2014 they had no choice but defend themselves from the brutality of Ukrainian armed forces by trying to force them reject their customs and way of life.
Online are interviews of a former senior commander stated that their orders were to destroy the population in Dotnesk, Dobass etc etc.
There are other interviews from other personnel's saying the evidence.
Did SBS troops help in the sinking of the Moskva?
It's often said God is "all seeing and all knowing" do you know what else is all seeing and all knowing? The intuition.
Also this is where knowledge of God comes from because it takes a miracle otherwise and those can't be easy to do.
there was video yesterday show scottish speakingout there same with down under
Ukraina yest no NATO War is close
Ussr all so had mig fighter jet pilots fighting with the South!! N shooting down the yanks!! In the V'nam war!! If you didn't know Keith !!
Yep Keith i NATO SF UNITS are in and out of Ukraine
They have the t wagon in a pie shop
So I have to look into history during the Spanish Civil War there were international brigade and sum were on the right it happens when you have a war of this type movies are on the left though an international brigade has been formed by those who are in brackets on the right unfortunately warfare and politics never mix well both sides use the captured personnel their own advantage in the said makes good read
This is not new news ! The UK has been training Ukrainian troops in Ukraine since 2022. The long range missiles cannot be launched without our satellite data which is why a red line will be crossed if they do. Whatever training we have given them has not worked, the war is lost !
My opinion seems to have upset 1 or more contributors to your channel. If at anytime you want me to “do one” as I have been told at least once after this video, I will without prejudice.
I won't take down any comments from either side of the argument as long as we are all respectful. I like to hear differing views mucker.
The west has been fighting against Communism for over 100 years in one form or another , and better men have fought against it and lost unfortunately , thats my take on it for what its worth ! Thank you . God bless . x
Communism?? Which country has communism because Russia isn't communist
@@garagenigel Smedley Butler War is a racket , sums it up
Please do not conflate the present day Russia with the USSR.
@@stu281 My apoloogies for any offence !
@@spitztheweevil no worries happens all the time. The fight against communism does go on. As it never sleeps.
opps think
Ukraine has faught russia over 10 years keith. Started in 2014 with invasion of crimea. It is a war.
I had a friend in ukraine was bomed out of her apartment by russian missile, ljved on streets many months. Last i heard was livi nd in the bombed out apartment in kharkov its 30 miles from russian boarder. Not much is left standing in her city now even hospitalz were attacked.
There are some uk forces in ukraine but as advisors and trainers i believe at the moment. Its not a hot war for us yet.
Hope it helps
No, it started with the American led coup which removed the legally elected Ukrainian government. Crimea jumped ship from Ukraine after that. There is an intercepted telephone converstation between Victoria Nuland and the US Ambassador to Ukraine talking about who they would put in their puppet government. The intercept is confirmed as real with Nuland calling it a great piece of espionage. Ukraine is losing the war and America and NATO are losers and Nuland was sacked from the State Department earlier this year.
Get your facts straight. The war started in 2014 in response to the American led Maidan Coup.
Every war has its “ developments “ in technology and tactics. Britain will have had troops in virtually every conflict around the world as “ advisors” or “ observers”. This is how the British army stays abreast of developments and at the forefront of inovations and how it gets an accurate assessment of the situation on the ground in order to report back to the politicians so that they can stay informed and be prepared to adjust political policy. To think that the biggest war in Europe is taking place since the Second World War and that Britain doesn’t have “ boots on the ground “ would, in my opinion be very nieve. I just wish the west was doing more.
Perhaps the question shouldn't be have we got troops in Ukraine but rather why they are there?
One interesting theory is lithium. Not the Nirvana track but the vital ingredient for all those wokemobiles - Teslas etc.
The WEF doesn't want China then Putin to have such control over lithium supplies. It spoils all their crooked little con schemes about a climate catastrophe.
Follow the money ...
Thanks for opening another interesting topic for discussion.
there are reports and some footage of uk,us and french special forces corpses having been identified during mop up operations in Kursk these unfortunates in most cases were not even told they were going there until last minute. THere is suggestion that they were scarificed for political gain in order to keep the support coming .
Utter nonsense 😂😂
@@garagenigelhe’s right.
Defo in Ukraine , it’s a secret 😂
Old headline news.
Keith , you’re normally always right in what You say , another good video once again .
However I am disappointed in some people’s comments about what they are saying .
To summarise , some people ( fair does its thier opinion ) but they are appeasing the Russians .
Appeasement doesn’t work .
I know mate, no worries 👍
😂😂😂😂
keep tabbing.
Dam NATO are all old men what is going on here young men died them all ?
CIA in Afghanistan? Charlie Wilsons War, I've read the book but haven't seen the film. Tom Hanks played Charlie.
Yeah green on mucker that we have BOOTS on the ground m8 already m8 .. pals there already m8. Other than that i cant say or tell more!! 😊
On the wrong side 😂
@@zaynevanday142 must be one of those ruskie bot
😂
The Russians already prepared a very warm welcome
Wrong way introducing reason of this situation are you just liar.
😂😂😂 Nato is a thing of history 😂😂😂
Jajajaja ahí vienen los norcoreanos, y todo occidente llorando
The North Koreans (or the Charley Chans) haven't fought their own shadows since the 50s and 60s, let alone fought ANY Western forces since, either. Oh, and a small number of British lads gave them both a bloody good pasting back then, too.
No all good here mucker, no one will be worrying about North Korean soldiers........apart from their family's, very sad.
👍👌
@@JohnBuckersdifferent game now that they've got nukes and icbms
@bl123-w8l It doesn't mean its infantry bods are any real use, though.
Any country that HAS to rely on such weapons to "win" anything isn't much cop at all, really, is it?
Evil Nato stop your madness ukraine belong to Russia