I hate to admit it: You're right. Really don't like the deepfaking on already deaged material, since mostly it looks weird and get's way to much praise for work, that is basically build upon the work of others... but this looks really good. Almost as De Niro in "GoodFellas" and weirdly the eyes look more alive. Would watch the movie with this level of editing for sure.
It's totally the eyes. DeNiro's got his old-man eyes in the original movie, even after de-aging him. The deepfake gives him youthful eyes. That difference is shocking.
Well the blue eyes were originally done to match Sheeran in real life, albeit they were done distractingly poorly. I wish DeNiro just wore color contacts in the film. The deepfake uses images of DeNiro's true eyes so it looks so much more natural.
This is so good; and with this you nailed the concept of younger people versus older people. Faces literally change; you can't just smooth away the wrinkles and call it a day. When he was younger, he had fuller lips, a five o clock shadow, vibrant eyes, a smoother jaw line, etc. You nailed it man, good job.
@@gamerdude4465 Yep. Exactly why LucasFilm hired him. Because he's a no-talent hack. Look, dude... this online "too cool for school, never impressed by anything" attitude coupled with complete and utter ignorance about how things are done + crapping on people who put out stuff when you predictably have nothing of value to offer TH-cam is way too predictable and hilarious. I'd tell you to quick while you're ahead but you never were ahead of anything. Next time, just don't post anything - you won't look as foolish.
@TheSkyWhale so you pick like 3 scenes where he's face didn't looked great of a three and a half hour movie which have 300 scenes, and you're making a point now? Hahaha!
@@reinisvaza4071 That's not the point he made, what he means is that even though we are supposed to be looking at ed Sheeran who most people don't know, we still see Deniro. And as most of us who grew up with Deniro's movies know that the deepfake looks more natural and you care less about the face and more about the story, whereas the deaging effect by Netflix even though its brilliant it just doesn't feel right since we humans are so quick to recognise if something is human or fake, or in this case a young Deniro or CGI Deniro
You put your finger on what's off about the original effect. If they cleaned it up around the eyes, then it would have been a much more convincing effect.
DeNiro looks like Creed that time he dyed his hair black and passed himself off as a 30-year old in the Office. It was such a distraction from the story. Not sure why they insisted on the CGI route when they could of cast a younger actor for the role.
What also throws me off, is that even in the very beginning of the movie when he’s at his youngest he walks like an 80 year old man, all slumped over. So he looks decent but as soon as he stands up it’s gone for me
Damn I love Scorsese but his research department is a fucking idiot if they didn't find this, considering it's a superior alternative. Fuck, I badly want someone to show Scorsese this video in an interview. Instant MI lmao
It’s obvious it looks better, to be fair you had a good starting point, since ILM deagening involved making cgi necks and helped makeups hairline. But it definitely makes you realize that an extra deepfake pass was needed. Amazing, amazing job!!
In most interviews with ILM they note how Scorsese didn't want DeNiro and Pesci to look exactly as they were at the time, but more like they were wearing prosthetic enhancements (this is why Pesci's nose doesn't look like his nose). A weird approach, it's like Scorsese said "we'll never be able to fool them because the audience knows their faces too well", so he decided to just have ILM create new faces that look a lot like the actors, and focus more on making it look like the character is actually there than making it look exactly as the actors were at that age (and properly translating the performance the actor gave).
@@matiful23 Prioritizing performance over believably being younger is an interesting approach. Even in this video, which I think shows that OBVIOUSLY the deepfake is more convincing for aging... there are a number of shots where bits of the performance are changed and it could change how we read the character. Little downturns in the mouth or subtleties around the eyes are less expressive, giving him a more neutral look in the deepfakes. I noticed it @2:20 but now that I look back through it... pretty much every shot reads slightly more neutrally in the deepfake.
@@mcfatty007 It's really noticeable on that scene at the end. He's not doing that thing De Niro does with his mouth in the ILM version. Also, deepfake can't slim down actors on their necks and body - which they did a lot of. Not yet anyways.
It looks incredible on a phone but try watching this on a large television. Even at 1080p, deepfakes use a lot of compression that'll stand out next to filmed elements. At higher resolutions it'd be even more distracting.
I hate to say this but you are right. Eyes in the original look unnatural, like glass. Here it looks way more natural. And i hated all of these Irishman deepfakes before. This was done nicely.
@@everydayworkingjoe5526 Yeah, but that wouldn't really fit here since Frank Sheeran is supposed to be a tough and muscular guy. Which this Deepfake De Niro fits perfectly.
You all are unbelievable. It's an AI filter. This guy didn't do anything. You all are praising him while insultingly ignoring the ACTUAL work put by people who worked on these scenes.
@@gamerdude4465 You don't get credit for work, only results. And this result looks better than what's in the film. I wasn't praising the guy either, I was praising the effect itself. Let me tell you something mate, envy is the only sin which gives no pleasure.
If studios are going to continue this trend of de-aging actors, at the very least they could use deepfake tech to study facial features they might’ve missed. To me, the eyes in these clips are the biggest change between the two and are totally what makes the difference between believable and unbelievable.
I mean they just need to pull one of De Niro age stage when he did a movie at age "30" and deepfake it to the timeline of the movie it suppose to be on. He's been on a movie every other year at least.
I remember that some time before the realse of the movie scorsese said he has problem with how the eyes looks, its intersting to know what he thinks about it today
@@lucasdamotta2931 - Yeah, should have waited five years and done it with body doubles and deepfake. I'm honestly interested to see where this tech goes. It'll be interesting to see them do biopics with the actual face of actors. The Beatles biopic would be amazing.
@@715creeks I agree, if we compare jimmy the Gent beating up Billy bats along side Tommy in Goodfellas, there is quite the difference, of course, one would argue it's DeNiro in his late 70's. They should've gotten a double.
@@flaviomelolima Ireland and Italy are European countries. Robert De Niro is of European descent so he passes as both Italian and Irish. What you said makes no sense at all. If Robert De Niro was Asian or African then maybe there would be an issue, but not in this case.
I don't understand why the film industry isn't using deepfakes more often. I mean every time they de-age a celebrity in one of these things, someone inevitably comes out with a deepfake after the fact that looks better than the original. You can't tell me a dude sitting around with some spare time and a 2080Ti has more time and tech available to him than a Hollywood studio. Its crazy.
The reason is simple. Its not good enough yet. I work in vfx and at the time of this film it simply couldnt be used to get an actual good result. Films arent going to use deepfakes until its essentially atleast 95 percent perfect. Also remember that this deepfake was made years after they already started production on this film. At this point the tech is already much more advanced
The thing about the movie is they didn’t de-“age”. They only de-wrinkled. They basically took the equivalent of an airbrush to their faces. De-aging is much more about getting rid of wrinkles. Facial structure changes drastically as one gets older but they completely neglected that.
You should see what they did. They lifted his chin, tightened his cheeks removed the double chin. A lot went into the technology. It's honestly leading innovation, what they're doing.
I love the fact that you seems to really think you know better than ILM visual effect experts and basically anyone who was involved in creating this movie
Br0wnH3s that’s not an argument. ILM doesn’t just get a free pass because they’re experts. Besides, even though they’ve done some great things, the studio also has a long history of mediocre CGI due to technical limitations, budget constraints, time constraints, and even bad decisions. The de-aging is just very poor and not believable at all. It’s a good thing most people just got used to looking past it and were still able enjoy the unreal movie.
@@jakelm4256 get a free pass because they're experts ? what are you talking about ? either they know what they're doing or they don't. secondly there is no such thing as de-aging. You live, you get old, than you die. They probably knows it doesn't look 100% real but they made a choice along with the director in their workflow and were satisfied enough with the result. Or maybe you know something better than ILM and you probably should teach them, maybe they will lend you their free pass or whatever.
Yes the eyes ruined it for me. The ‘blue’ just looked like very old man cataract eyes, not a youthful deep dark eyes he actually had as shown in this deep fake. I Would definitely pay for a fan fix of the whole thing.
I’ve watched this like 50 times now. I beg you, please, release the entire movie. This is absolutely insane how big a difference it is. It allows the movie to be what it is meant to be. Please do it.
I remember a multimedia class I took in college and we discussed realism. It’s hard to fool the human brain because it’s used to seeing certain things in reality and creates a permanent imprint of the visuals. If a studio’s VFX can’t fool the brain, it’s going to look fake. There are many layers of realism to consider and this guy nails what the major studios for years have failed to do. Good work my friend. ✊🏼
Well It's deepfake over cgi younger face. It wouldn't look this good on the De Niro in his 70s. It's looks great but it's just enhancement of what they already did.
Deep faking 2min30 is not the same thing as deep faking 3h. Plus the result is still meh if you look closely. You'd have to add extra man hours into it to manually retweek everything. Which would cost a lot of money.
He is handpicking scenes, they did a full head replacement in that film, not a face replacement. Which means you don't have to worry about consistence, even when he does a 360 turn, you'll have a hard time matching the back of the head to the face correctly in motion without headreplacement That's just the start of why headreplacement is still better.
What if I told you, they mucked it up on purpose? Scorsese answers to people above his paygrade, and while we're distracted by the Irishman's fails, you're not wising up to all the deep fakes you WILL NEVER notice, on Netflix or elsewhere.
Netflix: “Remember all those years ago when we met?” *flashes back to being 65 instead of 75* Deepfake: *actually makes them look like they’re in their 30s*
I couldn’t tell his age either, or how old he was supposed to be. The CGI wasn’t good and I would’ve preferred just younger actors. Like in goodfellas, it’d make the story a lot more immersing.
With all due respect they Could have used a double or a posture man, But no they went with a half paralysed grandpa way. Still loved the movie though. The technical team sucked ass.
Ajax Sid THATS WHAT I SAID!! They could’ve just CGed De Niro’s face over the double. And even the de-aging they used still made De Niro, Pesci and Pacino look like 50-60 year old men lol
This looks ABSOLUTELY incredible. Really, really good work. If Luke had looked this good at the end of The Mandalorian I wouldn’t have been completely taken out of the show at the end. Seriously though, looks exactly like DeNiro in the late 80s/early 90s. Phenomenal.
Even if ILM had nailed the de-aging on the face, they couldn't do anything about the body. When DeNiro is stomping on the guy on the sidewalk, he looks stupid, all hunched over, his arms all curled up against his body like a baby learning to walk. Every time he moves, he's giving away the fact that he's really 77 and not whatever age he's pretending to be. They should've done what Fincher did on Benjamin Button and use appropriate body doubles.
As a huge Scorsese fan, I absolutely cannot believe they sat there and decided “yep, that looks good enough to be in this film”, it completely killed any sort of immersion I had
zombiesingularity surprised nobody at Netflix brought it up, the film would’ve benefited if instead it just cut to a close up of his daughters horrified face while you could hear the beating take place off screen, it was that fucking bad
@@mdavis1992 Dunno if they did, but it would have been good if they had given DeNiro knee and ankle braces to wear. He could popped ibuprofen as well to help him ease any joint pain too and maybe taken up Yoga. One of the reasons Deniro walks like this is probably because of dodgy joints and unsure footing. He didn't need to be doing cart wheels, but he needed to look like he was a bit more sure of himself and his footing. Harrison Ford wouldn't have this problem.
The problem is people know how young DeNiro looks and not how Frank looks. I think it was a wrong choice in the end. This and the old man's body movement took me out of it. If they used a body double with CGI face it might be better.
Your work is legitly better quality than the actual movie. Deniro's age looks a bit inconsistent in different scenes, but most of your work is Top notch.
of course the deepfake isn't perfect, but it's very convincing. But just imagine how it's going to be improved in the next 5 years or so (or even less)
The face too. With the age rhe facial structures changes, the nose and ears became bigger and skin flabby, they forgott all this details and just focus on the wrinkles.
4 ปีที่แล้ว +3
@@masterwerneck Exactly, look how his "young" eyes are more open. His gaze is awake. The old eyes look tired and sleepy.
@@MicroClases_Ciencia Far from perfect, the test footage they did as a proof of concept worked extremely well. In the film the way her muscles and skin move is off.
I'll wait for someone to deepfake the whole movie before I watch it. This one waas seamless, you did an excellent job. Scorsese should see it and hire you to release an updated version
i wonder about that. who owns the rights to update the film? is it even possible? i mean, they have all that facial data somewhere. that would be incredible. the movie is fantastic and i think it deserves it
@@damienscott6561 they just need to redo it with a different actor with the deep fake. Ridley Scott did few visual tweaks in the new release of blade runner.
It’s one of the very extremely minor issues I’m sure we all had with the film, Scorsese nailed almost every aspect but the CGI face. At least it wasn’t as bad as justice league superman lip.
Tim2049 I’ve seen worse. I still got chills watching that scene a bit, but i understand what you mean. it looked like he wasn’t even touching him lmao.
To be fair, what we’re seeing isn’t a contest, it’s a de-aging deepfake layered on top of an already de-aged DeNiro. The deepfakes wouldn’t look that good without the CGI.
They are not using because it cant produce 8K image. Calculations takes too much time and you need to do lots of compositing to fix errors. Deep Fake is good for low quality work not production.
Absolutely incredible. He actually looks like a young de Niro. The Irishman is a great movie but I couldn't get immersed in it because it was always old de Niro no matter the age they were trying to depict. I think the other issue is that de Niro moves like an old man, and that's something that you can't fix.
Definitely looks more like younger De Niro however I believe the idea was to make De Niro look more like the real version of Frank Sheeran and not like himself. Great work nonetheless.
Yeah but they missed the ball. If they wanted to give him fake contacts; they still could of. The point is; when they made him de-age into his supposed 20's and 30's he still looked 70.
Absolutely stunning work... or training. Looks completely convincing and makes the actual movie look like they used a lookalike actor in place of Deniro. Yours looks like actual young Deniro. I can't believe professional movie studios aren't using this tech yet for de-aging. They should honestly pay you to just redo all those scenes and re-release the movie. It really looks that much better. Seriously, great work! You have the best DeepFake algorithm I've seen to date!
INDUSTRIAL LIGHT & MAGIC: "This is going to cost millions, our whole fleet of facial modeling and animations department will take the best part of the year to get it at 75 percent. Shamook "Give me a packet of crisps and the afternoon in my bedroom. I'll have it at 100 percent by next morning."
@José Menendéz I have no problem enjoying simple things, and I enjoyed this movie. But it wasn't all that great. Maybe Scorsese's 7th or 8th best movie.
@@ManuTheGreat79 It can be fixed, through mocapping. Get an actor whose body resembles a younger DeNiro and then stick this deep faked face on him. Voila.
I think it was Jeremy Jahns that said that how he saw the de aging in The Irishman was that it was making the character look younger, not Deniro. He compared it to Ant Man where in that, they make Michael Douglas look like how he did in one of his older movies, but in the Irishman, it's making the character Deniro is playing, look like a younger version of that character. So, I think Scorsese was going about this much differently than what can be done in a deepfake. Plus, your deepfake is much easier to do because of the effects already in the movie, I imagine it wouldn't be as seamless if you were deepfaking Deniro on his own.
True! But the biggest problem in the original is his mouth! :D The shape of it, the moving.. it's clearly an old man's mouth. That's why it's so bad. It's worse than some coloring mistake :(
The Irishman was a good film, only thing that partly ruined the experience was how weird the deaged DeNiro looked. This video is proof Hollywood should use Deepfake going forward.
@@cheezyfilmsproductions1842 yeah, they say that blah blah blah, then how come Pacino looks nothing like Hoffa and actually looks like a Donnie Brasco era Pacino?
@@GetToDaChoppa-k5r He's not the main character. They wanted to capture something with DeNiro that called for him to not look like himself -- I mean they went so far as to digitally change his eye color for the entire film. They obviously didn't want him to look exactly like a young DeNiro. Clearly they didn't have that same goal with other characters. You approach characters in a film on a case by case basis, not as a collective.
What's wrong the title 'The Irishman'? Personally, Al Pacino's and Joe Pesci's de-aging looked fine, but maybe the Deepfake versions would make it better.
Regardless of how relatively cheap it would be compared to the million-dollar VFX, the deepfakes wouldn't look this good without it. You can't have someone put a cherry on top of a sundae, and have the comments be like, "make a movie with the cherry instead".
The problem with the Netflix version was always the coloring of Deniro's eyes. His character was supposed to have blue eyes but instead of just using contacts they digitally colored his eyes blue. The lighting of the eyes was always off, usually too bright blue and glowing for the scene.
This is superb! Truly amazing, I wish we could see a full film with this alteration! One tiny food for thought perhaps: at 1:17 The Younger DeNiro looks more smug/amused like he would in Goodfellas or Casino etc but this was a serious conversation Frank was having with the mafia bosses, he wouldn't appear as relaxed or at ease. This might be due to the available footage training the software?
Honestly with this technology the movie would have been completely different, i could not appreciate it as much as I wanted because of the strange de niro's face without much expression and this weird aspect of not old, not young. You should contact Scorsese and show him this stuff, after all he works now for his legacy, and the irishman could be better technically.
This is by far your best work and also i think, the best work of deep fake there is out there. Its bizarre how good it looks and how it makes us believe its a young De Niro.
Fascinating! Especially if we take into account how much it cost and what amount of time it took to de-age the actors in THE IRISHMAN. Now one really talented guy can do it at his home computer and make it look even better in many parts. Hats off! :-) greetings from germany
It's really impressive. Part of me wonders if the weird sleepy vibe the original gives RDN is deliberate though - he seems too quick and intelligent now. Frank Sheeran was a docile, thoughtless sociopath who did whatever he was told without any sense of want or ambition, and those dull eyes really contribute to that.
Yes, it looks amazing, just like young De Niro. But that is not the role here people…yes it looks more like De Niro but he is playing Frank Sheeran this movie and not the role of himself…
They shoulda just hired you.
With an offer he can't refuse
ⅰи∂ㄩㄅ360 Edit from the edit? yeah, real hard
they shoulda just hired another actor instead of relying on """""stars""""""
Hollywood is more about connections and getting your friends work then results
@@Glatium with an Hoffa he can't refuse
The original deaged de Niro looks constantly grumpy. Deepfaked de Niro has that sharp, Goodfellas/Casino energy.
To be fair if you look at a picture of frank sheeran he has that grumpy look
Not really, the deepfaked de Niro looks dead inside. The perfect combo would be the deepfake, but have artists work on the eyes manually.
I was thinking the same thing about Casino
In Netflix his eyes are old and tired you can clearly see an old man .
I hate to admit it: You're right. Really don't like the deepfaking on already deaged material, since mostly it looks weird and get's way to much praise for work, that is basically build upon the work of others... but this looks really good. Almost as De Niro in "GoodFellas" and weirdly the eyes look more alive. Would watch the movie with this level of editing for sure.
It's totally the eyes. DeNiro's got his old-man eyes in the original movie, even after de-aging him. The deepfake gives him youthful eyes. That difference is shocking.
All I see is his eyes are too bright blue in the de-aged version. Seems like that was implemented on purpose but not sure why..
Exactly! The de-aging process does not take away the extra folds of skin.
Well the blue eyes were originally done to match Sheeran in real life, albeit they were done distractingly poorly. I wish DeNiro just wore color contacts in the film. The deepfake uses images of DeNiro's true eyes so it looks so much more natural.
Agreed. So much better. Honestly, I couldn't really watch the Netflix released version because the effects were too distracting.
O it's the facial structure. The de aging effects only took off the wrinkles and neglected the nose/ears size, flacid chicks and so on.
This is so good; and with this you nailed the concept of younger people versus older people. Faces literally change; you can't just smooth away the wrinkles and call it a day. When he was younger, he had fuller lips, a five o clock shadow, vibrant eyes, a smoother jaw line, etc. You nailed it man, good job.
Nah you people don't realize this channel didn't do anything.
This guy just used deepfake on ALREADY done work. Which isn't a big deal.
@@gamerdude4465 Yep. Exactly why LucasFilm hired him. Because he's a no-talent hack. Look, dude... this online "too cool for school, never impressed by anything" attitude coupled with complete and utter ignorance about how things are done + crapping on people who put out stuff when you predictably have nothing of value to offer TH-cam is way too predictable and hilarious. I'd tell you to quick while you're ahead but you never were ahead of anything. Next time, just don't post anything - you won't look as foolish.
@@gamerdude4465So at the very least it’s a proof of concept for an amazing refinement process. 🤷
Deepfake the whole thing release it on pirate bay!
He should get paid for it
@@monsieurbrochant7528 fundme page. But it gotta be rogue cos scorcese and them are gonna roll Cochran out of his grave.
H. C Not sure if he would be able to do anything about it. I mean look at the Star Wars „despecialized“ Fan edit.
Also do some edit (cut it down) and add some music! Someone has to fix the mistakes Scorsese made! PS. Deep fake looks amazing!
Hell yeah. It’s a damn shame it wasn’t done like this from the beginning.
everyone chip in 200$ so he can do the full movie...this needs to be done
If 200 is all it takes I’ll put in 50.
Fuck yeah
I would start a go fund me for a new deep fake in a second if it weren’t for the fact it would probably get shut down due to copyright:/
@@Sco10 why would you spend 200 million dollars to lose a copyright case
Im in! Really!!
Wow, the deepfake makes a convincing early 90s DeNiro.
But he isn't playing 90s De Niro. He is playing Frank Sheeran, who always looked older than his actual age. Look at Sheeran's pictures.
Man looks right out of A Bronx Tale
@TheSkyWhale so you pick like 3 scenes where he's face didn't looked great of a three and a half hour movie which have 300 scenes, and you're making a point now? Hahaha!
@@reinisvaza4071 That's not the point he made, what he means is that even though we are supposed to be looking at ed Sheeran who most people don't know, we still see Deniro. And as most of us who grew up with Deniro's movies know that the deepfake looks more natural and you care less about the face and more about the story, whereas the deaging effect by Netflix even though its brilliant it just doesn't feel right since we humans are so quick to recognise if something is human or fake, or in this case a young Deniro or CGI Deniro
Congrats on getting hired by Lucasfilm. Can't wait to see what you do over there.
That special edition of Mandalorian season 2 finale it's gonna be awesome.
Wait its real, if yes I'm glad to hear it
High hopes for the new Indiana Jones Movie.
@@unkommentiertesgameplay or something original
so basically they hired him for making Luke Skywalker face in Book of Bobba Fett
The original looks like De Niro with his 50-year-old skin and 80-year-old eyes, which is why the effects still look weird.
You put your finger on what's off about the original effect. If they cleaned it up around the eyes, then it would have been a much more convincing effect.
Even around the mouth. ILM did an amazing job but his should have been the finishing layer to bring it home
DeNiro looks like Creed that time he dyed his hair black and passed himself off as a 30-year old in the Office.
It was such a distraction from the story. Not sure why they insisted on the CGI route when they could of cast a younger actor for the role.
What also throws me off, is that even in the very beginning of the movie when he’s at his youngest he walks like an 80 year old man, all slumped over. So he looks decent but as soon as he stands up it’s gone for me
Yes i was thiking it will be good in men in black soon deniro will transform to thar insect
I would pay to watch a deepfake version of this movie.
I’m actually going to wait for that inevitable version before i decide to watch it
@@JimvsBob brilliant movie. Hope you watch it
@@JimvsBob Good idea. Its a great movie but the CGI is distracting.
Yea same
Make it happen! It’s infuriating how badly they fumbled the CGI in this incredible film. These clips are amazing.
They need to completely “deepfake” the entire movie for all the actors. The data, the technology is there.
imagine how cute with baby faces and all!
Valmor Nascimento will still kick like an old man though!
Damn I love Scorsese but his research department is a fucking idiot if they didn't find this, considering it's a superior alternative. Fuck, I badly want someone to show Scorsese this video in an interview. Instant MI lmao
@@boristrninic6709 I don't know, can't deepfake aid that too?
@Czterdziestysiódmy Scorsese is definitely clueless about deepfake. He's too old and old school to know what it is. Even many youth don't.
I hope to see a "remastered" version of _The Irishman_ in a few years when the deepfake technology has been perfected.
They were clearly not really trying to make him look exactly like a younger Di Niro.
@@justincase1853 No thanks. We destroy film culture by constantly replacing the past.
Agreed a hundred times better.
@@liteflightify Clearly.
@@liteflightify they should have
It’s obvious it looks better, to be fair you had a good starting point, since ILM deagening involved making cgi necks and helped makeups hairline. But it definitely makes you realize that an extra deepfake pass was needed. Amazing, amazing job!!
They actually used deepfakes as reference.
In most interviews with ILM they note how Scorsese didn't want DeNiro and Pesci to look exactly as they were at the time, but more like they were wearing prosthetic enhancements (this is why Pesci's nose doesn't look like his nose). A weird approach, it's like Scorsese said "we'll never be able to fool them because the audience knows their faces too well", so he decided to just have ILM create new faces that look a lot like the actors, and focus more on making it look like the character is actually there than making it look exactly as the actors were at that age (and properly translating the performance the actor gave).
@@matiful23 Prioritizing performance over believably being younger is an interesting approach.
Even in this video, which I think shows that OBVIOUSLY the deepfake is more convincing for aging... there are a number of shots where bits of the performance are changed and it could change how we read the character.
Little downturns in the mouth or subtleties around the eyes are less expressive, giving him a more neutral look in the deepfakes. I noticed it @2:20 but now that I look back through it... pretty much every shot reads slightly more neutrally in the deepfake.
@@mcfatty007 It's really noticeable on that scene at the end. He's not doing that thing De Niro does with his mouth in the ILM version.
Also, deepfake can't slim down actors on their necks and body - which they did a lot of. Not yet anyways.
Wow, that was a backhanded compliment. 😂
Mind-blowingly better.
Done on an already de-aged De Niro, let's not forget. But the eyes do look better.
The eyes look better because they digitally altered them to be blue in the film
Pretty sure those were contact lenses, but your point stands
It looks incredible on a phone but try watching this on a large television. Even at 1080p, deepfakes use a lot of compression that'll stand out next to filmed elements. At higher resolutions it'd be even more distracting.
They could have used a portion of the budget they spent to fix the compression, saved a chunk of money, and still have way better results.
Not only does he look younger than the original, but his eyes are full of life. While his eyes look dead in the original.
that's kind of the character the way i see it
Look at how "off" his eyes look at 0:15 in the original
@@pho3nix- Its because they gave De Niro blue eyes to match the real-life Frank. Thats why the de-aging looks even more off than it should.
I hate to say this but you are right. Eyes in the original look unnatural, like glass. Here it looks way more natural. And i hated all of these Irishman deepfakes before. This was done nicely.
You ever see Frank Sheeran? Stone cold. His eyes were dead since the 60s.
0:30 This one is unbelievable
If he was skinny, it would look like de niro from Taxi driver
@@everydayworkingjoe5526
Yeah, but that wouldn't really fit here since Frank Sheeran is supposed to be a tough and muscular guy. Which this Deepfake De Niro fits perfectly.
You all are unbelievable. It's an AI filter. This guy didn't do anything. You all are praising him while insultingly ignoring the ACTUAL work put by people who worked on these scenes.
@@gamerdude4465 You don't get credit for work, only results. And this result looks better than what's in the film. I wasn't praising the guy either, I was praising the effect itself. Let me tell you something mate, envy is the only sin which gives no pleasure.
If studios are going to continue this trend of de-aging actors, at the very least they could use deepfake tech to study facial features they might’ve missed.
To me, the eyes in these clips are the biggest change between the two and are totally what makes the difference between believable and unbelievable.
The eyes don't lie. Throughout the movie it was hard to ignore the strange eyes the 'young' CGI faces had...
I mean they just need to pull one of De Niro age stage when he did a movie at age "30" and deepfake it to the timeline of the movie it suppose to be on. He's been on a movie every other year at least.
I concur
To be fair, the character has blue eyes in the movie.
I remember that some time before the realse of the movie scorsese said he has problem with how the eyes looks, its intersting to know what he thinks about it today
This "young" Deniro in the original film was soooo weird. THIS. IS. PERFECT.
The DE-AGING cgi effect STILL makes Deniro look old.
DeepFake needs to be the new normal for de-aging actors. My God.
Maybe both?
Without the cgi effect deepfake will have a harder time masking those shaggy skin physics.
Incredible. Now if there was only a way to stop Bobby looking like a Geriatric when he beats the shop owner
deftones!!!!!
@@dennisrodman8706 👍🤘
LOL!! Right? I can't take that scene seriously.
Doubles, close takes...that scene was totally unnecessary
@@lucasdamotta2931 - Yeah, should have waited five years and done it with body doubles and deepfake. I'm honestly interested to see where this tech goes.
It'll be interesting to see them do biopics with the actual face of actors. The Beatles biopic would be amazing.
De Niro looks bloated in the IrishMan. the deepfake one makes him look like I remember him in Goodfellas
Totally agree
Yeah, he looks bloated, because his character look was like that. He wasn't slim like De Niro was in his 40s and 50s.
Agreed. The Netflix version looks like de-aged and also dying of severe alcoholism.
Also, he looks so awkward beating up a dude in his 40s on a street corner. Should’ve got a body double or shot it differently
@@715creeks I agree, if we compare jimmy the Gent beating up Billy bats along side Tommy in Goodfellas, there is quite the difference, of course, one would argue it's DeNiro in his late 70's. They should've gotten a double.
Damn you made him look like DeNiro in Casino....holy shit.
Nah goodfellas in Casino his hair is different
@@JohnDoe69986
Deepfake De Niro gives me Untouchables De Niro vibes too
Feels like I’m watching Jimmy Conway. Prime years
The deepfake version looks like De Niro back in the day when he played Don Vito in The Godfather part II. Should've been like this..
He's not supposed to look like young DeNiro, he's supposed to look like young Frank Sheeran.
nah he looks exactly like he did in goodfellas
@Spiros Pa i'm thinking the Untouchables
No, cause he’s supposed to look like an irish not a random young italian guy.
@@flaviomelolima Ireland and Italy are European countries. Robert De Niro is of European descent so he passes as both Italian and Irish. What you said makes no sense at all. If Robert De Niro was Asian or African then maybe there would be an issue, but not in this case.
I don't understand why the film industry isn't using deepfakes more often. I mean every time they de-age a celebrity in one of these things, someone inevitably comes out with a deepfake after the fact that looks better than the original. You can't tell me a dude sitting around with some spare time and a 2080Ti has more time and tech available to him than a Hollywood studio. Its crazy.
@Esther Sparrow It's because the technology isn't perfect yet. Simple as that.
@Esther Sparrow Don't think the Irishman is a good example of that, it's a very good movie
It's actually crazy how better this looks in comparison
The reason is simple. Its not good enough yet. I work in vfx and at the time of this film it simply couldnt be used to get an actual good result.
Films arent going to use deepfakes until its essentially atleast 95 percent perfect. Also remember that this deepfake was made years after they already started production on this film. At this point the tech is already much more advanced
One of the reason is that it will make many people unemployed.
The thing about the movie is they didn’t de-“age”. They only de-wrinkled. They basically took the equivalent of an airbrush to their faces. De-aging is much more about getting rid of wrinkles. Facial structure changes drastically as one gets older but they completely neglected that.
True!
You should see what they did. They lifted his chin, tightened his cheeks removed the double chin. A lot went into the technology. It's honestly leading innovation, what they're doing.
I love the fact that you seems to really think you know better than ILM visual effect experts and basically anyone who was involved in creating this movie
Br0wnH3s that’s not an argument. ILM doesn’t just get a free pass because they’re experts. Besides, even though they’ve done some great things, the studio also has a long history of mediocre CGI due to technical limitations, budget constraints, time constraints, and even bad decisions. The de-aging is just very poor and not believable at all. It’s a good thing most people just got used to looking past it and were still able enjoy the unreal movie.
@@jakelm4256 get a free pass because they're experts ? what are you talking about ? either they know what they're doing or they don't. secondly there is no such thing as de-aging. You live, you get old, than you die. They probably knows it doesn't look 100% real but they made a choice along with the director in their workflow and were satisfied enough with the result. Or maybe you know something better than ILM and you probably should teach them, maybe they will lend you their free pass or whatever.
The Eyes looks much better. I hated De Niro's Eyes in the Netflix version.
I think the problem was they made his eyes blue to convince us Frank was Irish
Yeah, his eyes looked droopy and washed out in the Netflix version. In this it's like Bobby from the 90s era
@@domenicofolino8289 his top eye lids are sagged, i mean he is old now.
sure they look more realistic to the actor, but the whole reason was that Frank HAD blue eyes and was IRISH!
It was a stylistic choice, but I agree. We don't need Bob to look just like Frank, just make him young again and make it look like young DeNiro.
Really big difference in the eyes and the overall "frowny" expression he has in the original clips. Amazing!
Yes the mouth area is where the age was very visible.
Stronger chin, too
Yes the eyes ruined it for me. The ‘blue’ just looked like very old man cataract eyes, not a youthful deep dark eyes he actually had as shown in this deep fake. I Would definitely pay for a fan fix of the whole thing.
“Frowny” “😟” lmao
@@sandyg.8318 I dunno, how else would you describe that?
This is unbelievably good.
I don’t know how you do it, but you should be the go-to guy in the movie biz for this stuff. You’re talented man.
He's been hired by Lucasfilm.
He doesn't do anything. He just lazily applies AI and makes the fool out of you people.
@@thomasvleminckx & I think he was fired by them. Why would they give money to lazy pricks?
I’ve watched this like 50 times now. I beg you, please, release the entire movie. This is absolutely insane how big a difference it is. It allows the movie to be what it is meant to be. Please do it.
This movie needs a deepfake reboot clearly
That what i was thinking too
Imagine if a Modder make by himself or remaster the movie in deepFake what bless
Someone should show this to Martin Scorsese so he can make a directors cut.
What they showed in Netflix was already THE director's cut.
No directors cuts with Scorsese
Definitely should
More like little corrections. The movie is already a director's cut.
He never was supposed to look like young Robert De Niro.
I remember a multimedia class I took in college and we discussed realism. It’s hard to fool the human brain because it’s used to seeing certain things in reality and creates a permanent imprint of the visuals. If a studio’s VFX can’t fool the brain, it’s going to look fake. There are many layers of realism to consider and this guy nails what the major studios for years have failed to do. Good work my friend. ✊🏼
I'll say it again... THIS is how it SHOULD be done!!!
Well It's deepfake over cgi younger face. It wouldn't look this good on the De Niro in his 70s. It's looks great but it's just enhancement of what they already did.
Morcorco so if it’s de aging + deep fake they could still start doing this to movies before they are released
@@Morcorco - Thing is, the Deep Fake would still work over DeNiro's 70 year old puss.
@Jack Meoff - Exactly!
Doesn't work in true HD
Deepfake: what one guy can achieve using his laptop in a kitchen beats an entire team of VFX company hired by Netflix.
to be fair they tried to make him look like Irishman, not Italian. Blue eyes etc. still failed thou
Deep faking 2min30 is not the same thing as deep faking 3h.
Plus the result is still meh if you look closely. You'd have to add extra man hours into it to manually retweek everything. Which would cost a lot of money.
@@jean-naymar602 will still cost a lot less money then CGI everything
He is handpicking scenes, they did a full head replacement in that film, not a face replacement. Which means you don't have to worry about consistence, even when he does a 360 turn, you'll have a hard time matching the back of the head to the face correctly in motion without headreplacement
That's just the start of why headreplacement is still better.
What if I told you, they mucked it up on purpose? Scorsese answers to people above his paygrade, and while we're distracted by the Irishman's fails, you're not wising up to all the deep fakes you WILL NEVER notice, on Netflix or elsewhere.
Netflix: “Remember all those years ago when we met?” *flashes back to being 65 instead of 75*
Deepfake: *actually makes them look like they’re in their 30s*
It was actually closer to ‘55 that they met.
I couldn’t tell his age either, or how old he was supposed to be. The CGI wasn’t good and I would’ve preferred just younger actors. Like in goodfellas, it’d make the story a lot more immersing.
This deepfake would’ve worked really well in the flashbacks to the Joffa timeline.
Juan Carlos Rivera I agree. In particular, when he kicks the shit out of the storekeeper, he looks elderly, rather than a man in his 30s lol
40s
Damn, this is amazing. He just looks like DeNiro in his Goodfellas days.
exacto
And Casino days.
Now if only Deepfake could redo the awkward beatdown scene.
With all due respect they Could have used a double or a posture man, But no they went with a half paralysed grandpa way. Still loved the movie though. The technical team sucked ass.
Ajax Sid THATS WHAT I SAID!! They could’ve just CGed De Niro’s face over the double. And even the de-aging they used still made De Niro, Pesci and Pacino look like 50-60 year old men lol
I frickin hated that scene. Who in their right mind looked at that scene and said it was gonna be okay for the movie?
@@rossdiamondthief6627 I thought the same as well.
@@ajaxsid9034 seriously. The fact that the movie works so well in spite of all the bad makeup and stuff just shows you how good this thing is.
Their foggy eyes was the worst part. Now it looks stunning!
They gave him deep blue eyes when he always had brown eyes that reflected more.
Looks like someone with a Deniro mask so I'm gonna have to disagree
Amazing work, needs a final grit layer, too smooth
agreed. and also the movement a little smoother. on the other hand amazing!! job
This is fan made what do you expect.
yeap i agree with you
There's no grit layer in machine learning.
@@supersmashhead5663 it’s just criticism and it’s not even for you why u mad
This looks ABSOLUTELY incredible. Really, really good work. If Luke had looked this good at the end of The Mandalorian I wouldn’t have been completely taken out of the show at the end. Seriously though, looks exactly like DeNiro in the late 80s/early 90s. Phenomenal.
You shoud edit the whole movie. We will pay you, this movie needs you
Even if ILM had nailed the de-aging on the face, they couldn't do anything about the body. When DeNiro is stomping on the guy on the sidewalk, he looks stupid, all hunched over, his arms all curled up against his body like a baby learning to walk. Every time he moves, he's giving away the fact that he's really 77 and not whatever age he's pretending to be. They should've done what Fincher did on Benjamin Button and use appropriate body doubles.
As a huge Scorsese fan, I absolutely cannot believe they sat there and decided “yep, that looks good enough to be in this film”, it completely killed any sort of immersion I had
@@mdavis1992 it's because Netflix has a rushed filming schedule so imperfections sneak in, sadly
zombiesingularity surprised nobody at Netflix brought it up, the film would’ve benefited if instead it just cut to a close up of his daughters horrified face while you could hear the beating take place off screen, it was that fucking bad
@@mdavis1992 Dunno if they did, but it would have been good if they had given DeNiro knee and ankle braces to wear. He could popped ibuprofen as well to help him ease any joint pain too and maybe taken up Yoga. One of the reasons Deniro walks like this is probably because of dodgy joints and unsure footing. He didn't need to be doing cart wheels, but he needed to look like he was a bit more sure of himself and his footing. Harrison Ford wouldn't have this problem.
there are neural networks that can correct body position and allow you to animate someone after the fact
In defense of the Irishman's, they made him look closer to how Frank Sheeran actually looks instead of how Robert De Niro looked back then
Yeah after watching a few videos on how they did it, it seems the bigger challenge was figuring out how to de-age the character rather than De Niro.
Exactly!
People seem to forget that Roberts playing a character so he shouldn’t look like himself but younger, he should look like frank but younger
The problem is people know how young DeNiro looks and not how Frank looks. I think it was a wrong choice in the end. This and the old man's body movement took me out of it. If they used a body double with CGI face it might be better.
Exactly!
Your work is legitly better quality than the actual movie. Deniro's age looks a bit inconsistent in different scenes, but most of your work is Top notch.
I like the deepfake more than the CG Netflix used.
Really it's a deepfake over the Netflix CG so it's a combo.
Best of both worlds.
...and the Netflix CG was over the original face and acting of Mr. DeNiro himself. Best of THREE worlds.
@@elleroy9775 That is a very good point.
of course the deepfake isn't perfect, but it's very convincing. But just imagine how it's going to be improved in the next 5 years or so (or even less)
it actually is perfect, people blend it incorrectly....you need to bring the original back in 20% to get rid of those super smooth edges
To me it really looked like 90s De Niro, the resemblance is uncanny. Watch Heat or Casino and then watch this video.
@@dyveira just watched Casino few hours ago definitely look like him
Dunno the technology has its limitations
It's basically perfect idk what you're seeing.
Problem for me really wasn't the face, it was the body, and how even when he was supposed to be young he moved like an old man.
The face too. With the age rhe facial structures changes, the nose and ears became bigger and skin flabby, they forgott all this details and just focus on the wrinkles.
@@masterwerneck Exactly, look how his "young" eyes are more open. His gaze is awake. The old eyes look tired and sleepy.
his emotions come through so much better with your version it's insane.
Producer : “We make a game changing and the most expensive CGI in the history of cinema to make the actors face look younger in this movie”
TH-camr :
The deepfake wouldn't look nearly as good if the expensive cgi wasn't already there as a starting point.
@@HOTD108_ We don't use common sense here.
@@HOTD108_ Bro, you don't know if that is true for a fact. And if it is true, why not use both? cuz that shit was hilarious.
@@HOTD108_ it would look even better if they just deepfaced old de Niro's face.
@@aniruddhmurthy6970 wouldn't common sense dictate putting deepfake on top of the original technology as it's done here?
Imagine how embarrassing being the CGI Netflix team and watching this.
The deepfakes wouldn’t look this good without the CGI anyway, so how would they find it embarrassing?
@@hanzschmidt3234 do u realise the deepfake here is using the data achieved by films cgi team,
they prob paid millions for what they got too
ILM is fine. They have nothing to worry about over this. BUT, Grand Moff Tarkin... that VFX abortion needs its own 'come-to-jesus' talk.
@@MicroClases_Ciencia Far from perfect, the test footage they did as a proof of concept worked extremely well. In the film the way her muscles and skin move is off.
I'll wait for someone to deepfake the whole movie before I watch it. This one waas seamless, you did an excellent job. Scorsese should see it and hire you to release an updated version
I want to watch this edit!!
Even deepfake won't fix the scene when DeNiro's character beats up a store owner.
@@damienscott6561 Still would make it look a ton less cringy and watch-worthy
i wonder about that. who owns the rights to update the film? is it even possible? i mean, they have all that facial data somewhere. that would be incredible. the movie is fantastic and i think it deserves it
@@damienscott6561 they just need to redo it with a different actor with the deep fake. Ridley Scott did few visual tweaks in the new release of blade runner.
They would need to CG their movement too cause they were moving like two grandmas
“I heard you deep fakes.”
Almost perfect, but his face doesn’t look quite as expressive.
True, but in the original version the fake De-aging look is distracting quite often
He comes off looking more gangster in the younger version.
Replayed it many times...its expression are bland
The more expressive the more it looks like a grandpa playing tbh, age mimics distracted me from the movie
I came here to say that. Its like the mouth expressions are totally removed particularly on the sides.
The de-aging of Robert De Niro in "The Irishman" only made him look like an old man with a facelift.
The scene at 2:02 looks so good
Its kinda sad that someone did this at home lmao when the entire movie de aging technology still looks worse.
That's exactly what I thought. Very sad
It’s one of the very extremely minor issues I’m sure we all had with the film, Scorsese nailed almost every aspect but the CGI face. At least it wasn’t as bad as justice league superman lip.
@@somegeekguy Dont forger the fight choreography! DeNiro beating on that shopkeeper is literally the worst fight scene I've ever witnessed.
Tim2049 I’ve seen worse. I still got chills watching that scene a bit, but i understand what you mean. it looked like he wasn’t even touching him lmao.
To be fair, what we’re seeing isn’t a contest, it’s a de-aging deepfake layered on top of an already de-aged DeNiro.
The deepfakes wouldn’t look that good without the CGI.
The only issue is that the facial performance gets a little stiff
a lot more stiff
Nah nah nah
Nah it's fine
@@reverendx4ever you insulted him a little bit
I think this is why Scorsese didnt go the whole way. But this deepfake is really superb.
Why the hell aren’t studios using THIS technology, like seriously..?
Exactly. Maybe it'll make too many digital artist nervous.
It may be illegal due to the fact that it uses images from other films which the studio doesn’t have the rights to
@@joescad I think your right
They are not using because it cant produce 8K image. Calculations takes too much time and you need to do lots of compositing to fix errors. Deep Fake is good for low quality work not production.
@@bulentgercek AI upscaling will probably be able to fix the resolution.
Absolutely incredible. He actually looks like a young de Niro. The Irishman is a great movie but I couldn't get immersed in it because it was always old de Niro no matter the age they were trying to depict.
I think the other issue is that de Niro moves like an old man, and that's something that you can't fix.
Definitely looks more like younger De Niro however I believe the idea was to make De Niro look more like the real version of Frank Sheeran and not like himself. Great work nonetheless.
That’s a very important point that a lot of people are not understanding.
Yeah but they missed the ball. If they wanted to give him fake contacts; they still could of. The point is; when they made him de-age into his supposed 20's and 30's he still looked 70.
Isaiah Reimer
Although I felt it was a bit off, frank sheeran had old looking face even when he was in his 30’s so he looked older than he was
Absolutely stunning work... or training. Looks completely convincing and makes the actual movie look like they used a lookalike actor in place of Deniro. Yours looks like actual young Deniro. I can't believe professional movie studios aren't using this tech yet for de-aging.
They should honestly pay you to just redo all those scenes and re-release the movie. It really looks that much better. Seriously, great work! You have the best DeepFake algorithm I've seen to date!
The Netflix deniro looks like the dad of deepfake deniro.
The only issue with this is that the deepfake looks like De Niro perfectly. They were trying to make him look more like Frank Sheeran.
Now, remake the whole movie 🍿
This is SO much better than the way they originally did it. I just accepted it was a younger De Niro immediately. This is excellent work.
This looks so much better than the actual movie itself. You even got rid of that strange blue eye effect that is so weird.
INDUSTRIAL LIGHT & MAGIC: "This is going to cost millions, our whole fleet of facial modeling and animations department will take the best part of the year to get it at 75 percent.
Shamook "Give me a packet of crisps and the afternoon in my bedroom. I'll have it at 100 percent by next morning."
Crisps?? Haha
I wanna see what he would be able to do with the rushes that were shot directly.
Remember, ILM did almost all the work, it's deepfake over CGI
@@mamaluigi1579 Lol, no. It doesn't work that way.
Orangeflava its British for potato chips
Year 2099:
Goodfellas part 6 starring Joe pesci and Robert Deniro.
This is incredible. Why the hell didn't they just do this? The de-aging was the worst part of the movie.
Movie was meh
@José Menendéz I have no problem enjoying simple things, and I enjoyed this movie. But it wasn't all that great. Maybe Scorsese's 7th or 8th best movie.
The deepfake looks like they got into a time machine so they could cast 1990s De Niro. Outstanding work.
Yikes was halfway through before realising it wasn't a before and after it was an after and after after. Now to make the voices younger.
And perhaps it could make the gestures younger.
He moves like an old man. Perhaps this can be fixed
@@ManuTheGreat79 It can be fixed, through mocapping. Get an actor whose body resembles a younger DeNiro and then stick this deep faked face on him. Voila.
@@ManuTheGreat79 Bro how far you want to take it? Just take the actors out completely?
@@ManuTheGreat79 What else you're gonna change? The music? Editing? Why not make your own movie then?
@@Despair505 I can imagine we ( not me of course ) 'll make movies with dead actors. Bruce Lee, Steve McQueen,...
I think it was Jeremy Jahns that said that how he saw the de aging in The Irishman was that it was making the character look younger, not Deniro. He compared it to Ant Man where in that, they make Michael Douglas look like how he did in one of his older movies, but in the Irishman, it's making the character Deniro is playing, look like a younger version of that character. So, I think Scorsese was going about this much differently than what can be done in a deepfake. Plus, your deepfake is much easier to do because of the effects already in the movie, I imagine it wouldn't be as seamless if you were deepfaking Deniro on his own.
Jesus, that's insane. After seeing this, you realize how much money Netflix really wasted on VFX.
I wish it was also possible to deepfake a believable beatdown when DeNiro goes after the grocery guy.
Techniques Hollywood should start using:
- Virtual Engines for CGI
- Deepfakes for de-aging and stuntmen
The reason Netflix’s looks “off” is they made his eyes blue.
True! But the biggest problem in the original is his mouth! :D
The shape of it, the moving.. it's clearly an old man's mouth. That's why it's so bad.
It's worse than some coloring mistake :(
@@donniedarko0 I agree that the mouth/lips was the most "old" looking part in the original
The real-life Frank Sheeran had blue eyes.
Ijaz13 yeah and that’s why he looks weird
Patrick Tomasso Yep. It does look weird. But what other option did they have? They had to give him blue eyes.
Holy shit .... Soooo much better ❤
The Irishman was a good film, only thing that partly ruined the experience was how weird the deaged DeNiro looked. This video is proof Hollywood should use Deepfake going forward.
he actually looks like himself.. wish the movie achieved what you did.
They weren't trying to make him look like young Deniro. They were trying to make him look like the guy the movie is based on.
@@cheezyfilmsproductions1842 yeah, they say that blah blah blah, then how come Pacino looks nothing like Hoffa and actually looks like a Donnie Brasco era Pacino?
@@GetToDaChoppa-k5r He's not the main character. They wanted to capture something with DeNiro that called for him to not look like himself -- I mean they went so far as to digitally change his eye color for the entire film. They obviously didn't want him to look exactly like a young DeNiro. Clearly they didn't have that same goal with other characters. You approach characters in a film on a case by case basis, not as a collective.
Wilful ignorant people like you will think he made something remotely good compared to original version. He just added deepfake...
The film was good, but Pacino’s, De Niro’s and Pesci’s de-ageing effects were jarring, they took me and others out of the story.
In some scenes you even improved on the lighting. I felt the Netflix version made the skin too yellow at times, like he had jaundice 😅
Looks like him straight outta Casino. Incredible!
They should completely “deepfake” the entire movie for all the actors and officially call it " I Heard You Paint Houses"
I Heard You Deepfake Faces
What's wrong the title 'The Irishman'?
Personally, Al Pacino's and Joe Pesci's de-aging looked fine, but maybe the Deepfake versions would make it better.
@@WhyTho525 None of the trio looked a day under 70 for a single frame of the film.
Regardless of how relatively cheap it would be compared to the million-dollar VFX, the deepfakes wouldn't look this good without it.
You can't have someone put a cherry on top of a sundae, and have the comments be like, "make a movie with the cherry instead".
@@cockoffgewgle4993 Yeah, I think a lot of people feel that way.
The problem with the Netflix version was always the coloring of Deniro's eyes. His character was supposed to have blue eyes but instead of just using contacts they digitally colored his eyes blue. The lighting of the eyes was always off, usually too bright blue and glowing for the scene.
100%!!!! The eyes look awful!
He's a vampire
I can’t stop watching this. Deepfake Deniro looks so good. Need to remaster the whole movie now.
This is superb! Truly amazing, I wish we could see a full film with this alteration!
One tiny food for thought perhaps: at 1:17 The Younger DeNiro looks more smug/amused like he would in Goodfellas or Casino etc but this was a serious conversation Frank was having with the mafia bosses, he wouldn't appear as relaxed or at ease. This might be due to the available footage training the software?
Honestly with this technology the movie would have been completely different, i could not appreciate it as much as I wanted because of the strange de niro's face without much expression and this weird aspect of not old, not young. You should contact Scorsese and show him this stuff, after all he works now for his legacy, and the irishman could be better technically.
He wasn't supposed to look like young De Niro. He was supposed to look like Frank Sheeran.
I want a deepfake edition of this movie. Truly remarkable results
This is by far your best work and also i think, the best work of deep fake there is out there. Its bizarre how good it looks and how it makes us believe its a young De Niro.
Fascinating! Especially if we take into account how much it cost and what amount of time it took to de-age the actors in THE IRISHMAN. Now one really talented guy can do it at his home computer and make it look even better in many parts. Hats off! :-)
greetings from germany
It's really impressive. Part of me wonders if the weird sleepy vibe the original gives RDN is deliberate though - he seems too quick and intelligent now. Frank Sheeran was a docile, thoughtless sociopath who did whatever he was told without any sense of want or ambition, and those dull eyes really contribute to that.
2:20 that is just perfect
Yes, it looks amazing, just like young De Niro. But that is not the role here people…yes it looks more like De Niro but he is playing Frank Sheeran this movie and not the role of himself…
De-aged an already de-aged Deniro? Still interesting none the less.
These movies should seriously go back to the editing suite using this new tech. Makes a massive difference.
So much better! The eyes really bugged me in the Netflix version.
Robert DeNiro wasn’t supposed to look like a young Robert DeNiro he was supposed to look like a young Frank Sheeran.
This cool and all but De Niro’s character isn’t himself, its Frank Sheeran
RedRedMCmusic yeah but young frank Sheeran looks all wrong, his eyes are tired, he almost looks Chinese tbh
@@sulimanduliman8661 The real Frank Sheeran looked tired.
Why didn't they just cast young Frank Sheeran to play himself? Smh
@@JimTheCurator
did you poop today?
@@RedRedMCmusic Matter of fact, I did but it didn't look very convincing.