And he didn't even said that this guy is not a paid actor. Counterpoint, hiring a paid actor (or unpaid actor) for this challenge is something a coward would do, and CS is NOT a coward.
It was probably worth pointing out in the video just how low on time the opponent was. According to the rules of the challenge, if the opponent runs out of time, you don't deliver checkmate, and a win by time is not a draw, so you wouldn't get any additional money.
The same challenge, but not $2 for every point you lose, but $2 for every point of material difference in opponent's favor (i.e. Simp cannot capture much)
I really wonder if they meant to say they would pay for however many points Simp was lower than the opponent instead. Unless the person issuing the challenge just has that much money to throw away.
The opponent had 2.3 seconds in the end screen, so it was less mercy and moreso securing what he had since the challenge only applies if checkmate is achieved
@@UnknownRager96 yeah that's interesting, cause now that you point it out, the challange's wording didn't even take into account the outcome of simp winning, but through different means than checkmate. so it kinda looks like "win by checkmate I pay you, make a draw I pay you half less, but win in any other way you get no money" xd I don't know if that was intentional on creator's part
@@rohan1864 You could even argue that for a draw it would just be $1 total. It could be (maliciously) interpreted as: "I will send a) an additional $2 for each point of material you love before delivering checkmate, (or) b) for a draw, $1"
well, we assume the opponent doesn't resign, or rage quit, or something like that, because that violates the terms of the agreement. anyway, then you would just keep at it until someone lets it go until mate. again, according to the LETTER of the contract, trades are fine. BLUNDERS are not required. so, you can "lose" your entire starting army, valued at 31. then, you will need to trade about 4 pawns for -4 (estimate). you can promote 3 of the remaining pawns to a queen, and then botez gambit them all for -27. (promoting a pawn does not count as :losing: the pawn) of course, the final piece must be kept. total "loss" = ~ 62 pay $124. consultant fee @10% = $12.40
Looks like Simp paid the actor $100, because he gave away his women until he got over $100 and only then checkmated him. He could've got more, but apparently Simp isn't greedy.
@@IamGrimalkin I had a game that goes like this 1) I sacrificed my old queen 2) I promoted a pawn and created a new queen 3) I thought that I am genius cause I just teleported my queen to more active square and I didn't lost any material. 4) Material caunt was '-1'.
@bajanya_vmerty that's because you had -9 then +8 so you LOST 9 points, then gained 8, resulting in -1 overall. You didn't lose material because of promotion, you lost material for the queen sacrifice. A classic tradeoff of material value for a positional advantage
@@FoxSlyme But why did I get only 8 material, if I get a new queen? Queen worth 9. Isn't it because I lost a pawn in the process? I mean, you can say I didn't lost it, but leveled it up. But I can say my pawn is a cult member and sacrificed itself to summon a better warrior on the field.
Bro is just sacrificing a bunch of women for money
Andrew "Simp" Tate
And immediately after grooming them to be valuable!
More like chess pimp
Obviously to survive NNN
Now it's at 666 likes
53 dollars for him, 53 dollars for the paid actor.
106 dollars for him, 0 dollars for the unpaid Indian actor.
106 dollars for me (I stole it)
Opponent does not resign in a challenge that greatly benefits Simp from the opponent not resigning.
Very convenient... and not suspicious at all.
The funds from the challenge have to go into paying that actor you know.
Low elo players take the queen and feel on top of the world for the entire game
And he didn't even said that this guy is not a paid actor.
Counterpoint, hiring a paid actor (or unpaid actor) for this challenge is something a coward would do, and CS is NOT a coward.
Or the game is cherry picked.
very paid actor
The opponent whenever there's a money challenge: You know what? I DO feel like moving my king around aimlessly for 20 turns
Quite a few videos have the same.
Indian players do not quite
In low elo it's quite common
This isn’t the first money challenge?
@@SoujiOkitaTwo newgen found
It was probably worth pointing out in the video just how low on time the opponent was. According to the rules of the challenge, if the opponent runs out of time, you don't deliver checkmate, and a win by time is not a draw, so you wouldn't get any additional money.
That’s probably why he chosed to deliver a fast checkmate in the end
Ah, thanks, that totally explains why not all the pawns were pushed
Ty
Can’t believe that opponent didn’t resign when they only had a king left.
They could hope for stalemate I suppose. I wonder if a 100 rated player even knows what that is though
That's bc they're a paid actor
that's what 100 rated chess is like.
That's one way of getting rich by playing chess
Thanks for doing the fast version. Much better than skipping.
that was definitely a paid actor
Simp now has money anyway, so he can afford one😂
The actor got a 10% cut from this video.
the paidest actor ever
Props to this opponent for not resigning.
future simp is great. he does all the editing so simp can focus on the game
I sacrificed my woman for 18 dollars. She wasn’t too happy about it, but my buddy at work was thrilled!
4:16 A 132 seeing a pinned pawn like that is a bit hard to believe
that 132 probably didn't even see the pawn defending the knight
@@eaglepeakalphaunless they're blind, no
Usually simp says "Can't milk too much money from my viewer. But today he said IDGAF
Viewer: I'll pay you for losing material
Simp: Botez gambit, let's go
One day, he will say: "surely they won't resign, right?"
And the opponent resigns
The same challenge, but not $2 for every point you lose, but $2 for every point of material difference in opponent's favor
(i.e. Simp cannot capture much)
this is what the challenge should have been tbh. much more interesting!
Yeah this is what I thought it would be. Would have been a really cool challenge to see someone trying to win with the least material advantage
Waiting until the opponent only had 2.3 seconds left? Excellent work.
Opponent not resigning when having no pieces is amazing, what a well paid actor.
Fun fact: 106 USD equals approximately 2,695,047.72 Simp money
25 days of food
I really wonder if they meant to say they would pay for however many points Simp was lower than the opponent instead. Unless the person issuing the challenge just has that much money to throw away.
It was a $50 donation to issue the challenge, i think they just had that much money to throw away
Simp didn’t show him finding an opponent. Very suspicious
He hasn't done that in a WHILE. I'm pretty sure it's because that part usually felt like filler.
I appreciate you having mercy on the poor guy who made this challange in the end lol
The opponent had 2.3 seconds in the end screen, so it was less mercy and moreso securing what he had since the challenge only applies if checkmate is achieved
@@UnknownRager96 yeah that's interesting, cause now that you point it out, the challange's wording didn't even take into account the outcome of simp winning, but through different means than checkmate. so it kinda looks like "win by checkmate I pay you, make a draw I pay you half less, but win in any other way you get no money" xd I don't know if that was intentional on creator's part
@@rohan1864 You could even argue that for a draw it would just be $1 total. It could be (maliciously) interpreted as: "I will send a) an additional $2 for each point of material you love before delivering checkmate, (or) b) for a draw, $1"
Simp treats objects like women
Personification is HOT! We got Sentry-chan, Earth-chan...others
4:01 That was actually absolutely amazing that the 132-rated chess player actually saw that tactic - I mean, it's an Indian but still
That was savage on so many different levels.
Basically trade to an endgame and hope your opponent doesn't resign
Wow, simp actually hold back from just sacrificing the whole board.
Probably because the opponent had 2 seconds left on the clock
5:16 chess asmr
4:10 The the fact that your opponent saw Rxf4 is crazy 💀
well, we assume the opponent doesn't resign, or rage quit, or something like that, because that violates the terms of the agreement. anyway, then you would just keep at it until someone lets it go until mate.
again, according to the LETTER of the contract, trades are fine. BLUNDERS are not required.
so, you can "lose" your entire starting army, valued at 31.
then, you will need to trade about 4 pawns for -4 (estimate).
you can promote 3 of the remaining pawns to a queen, and then botez gambit them all for -27. (promoting a pawn does not count as :losing: the pawn) of course, the final piece must be kept.
total "loss" = ~ 62
pay $124. consultant fee @10% = $12.40
1:45 "of course he sees this" kkkkkkkkkkkkk
For anyone curious, the maximum amount of money he could’ve won with perfect play from him and a paid actor is $188
"Sacrificing my woman for $18... Absolutely always worth it" lmao
"Subscribe or your cat puts you on sale" lmao
Looks like Simp paid the actor $100, because he gave away his women until he got over $100 and only then checkmated him. He could've got more, but apparently Simp isn't greedy.
Opponent had 2 seconds on the clock
He had to "deliver a check mate" and the opponent was running out of time
Queen promotion Infinite money glitch, only drawback is limited time.
Every single pawn he promoted is actually +2$ cause he lost a pawn in the process each time. Missing this makes me think he is not an asian
He didn't lose a pawn, they just changed gender.
The Pawn's bounty increased.
@@IamGrimalkin I had a game that goes like this 1) I sacrificed my old queen 2) I promoted a pawn and created a new queen 3) I thought that I am genius cause I just teleported my queen to more active square and I didn't lost any material. 4) Material caunt was '-1'.
@bajanya_vmerty that's because you had -9 then +8
so you LOST 9 points, then gained 8, resulting in -1 overall. You didn't lose material because of promotion, you lost material for the queen sacrifice. A classic tradeoff of material value for a positional advantage
@@FoxSlyme But why did I get only 8 material, if I get a new queen? Queen worth 9. Isn't it because I lost a pawn in the process? I mean, you can say I didn't lost it, but leveled it up. But I can say my pawn is a cult member and sacrificed itself to summon a better warrior on the field.
I thought you had to subtract the value of the pieces you capture
Reenactment of the French Revolution.
I mean, weren't they Indian too? Legends state they can never give up in chess.
Infinite money glitch discovered
The women he sacrifices will meet him in heaven
If you're reading this, I hope you have a good day!
You too!
i dont :/ but thanks
Thanks man (or woman) 👍
U 2!
Holy smokes, that's a lot of money for where I live
Taketaketaketaketake
origins
origins
106% win rate
Paid actor splits half the winnings, right?
ballin
Quadrillion? Do you mean a million to the power of four or one thousand times a thousand to the power of four?
A million to the power of four is a septillion though
@@boredlake Depends on who you ask, look up the long scale.
Botez gambit, let's go!
Disregard women
Acquire currency
Bro missed 45$😢😢😢😢 he could promote more pawns
He needed the checkmate the opponent to get the money & the opponent's clock ran out so xDD
Why didn't you promote all your pawns????
Easy money
nope...promoted pawns still count as 1, therefore they ain't real women
Proof?
@@SoujiOkitaTwo material difference when taken. i believe it was even brought up in one of his much older videos.
57 minutes ago, let’s go