I've got the early version, too. Very sharp lens. I also have the Sigma art 24-105, which I fancy is very slightly better. But it's close. Trouble is the Sigmas a LOT heavier to carry about.
I watched another review that covered one important aspect your review didn't pick up. The noise of stabilization. The original mk 1 is definitely noisey with stabilization on, this is a problem for video guys and gals with sound on. The new version is silent. My takeaway is that is the deal breaker if you are going to use this lens a lot for videos, if not everything else you said about both being very similar is true. And it is true that if you are primarily a stills person, I am, then the original is great, especially for the price. In the video you also mentioned that these lenses were "prime," I'm assuming you are meaning L quality. But prime in photographic language as you well know doesn't mean L quality. But I did get the mk 2 version should I shoot more video sometime.
Just bought the OG 24-105 f4 from a nice Lady in Schwanheim for 250€s. With an absent Red Ring. (Being my first L, I kinda thought it was just a sticker / painted on.) Other than that the Lens is 100% one of the first Shots I took at the darkest part of the blue hour of an on coming Straßenbahn 16 -> Offenbach was probably one of the best Fotos I've yet taken. It was taken at iso 3200 on a 5D mkII, and has some noise in the street, ant the nose ofvthe Tram, but its was not as distracting as i thought. The joke is knowing that the Lens fairs poorly in low light I wasn't expexting anything. So I just took it freehand, and to my surprise the image came out really sharp. The only ghosting / blur is visible on the Schaumainkai Streetsign. Its a bit ghosted, but zoomed in perfectly legable. Like I said this was like 5 maximum 10 minutes before nightfall. I think I love this lens, and for 250€, when eveyone and their Dog wants 400€ for it, this was a no brainer.
Congratulations on your new purchase! It sounds like you got a great deal on the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L lens. Despite the missing red ring, it's still a fantastic lens known for its versatility and image quality. It's impressive to hear that you were able to capture such a sharp and clear shot in challenging low-light conditions with your Canon 5D Mark II. The fact that the image came out well despite the lens's reputation for being less suited to low-light situations speaks to your skill as a photographer and the capabilities of the camera. Getting such a great shot so quickly after acquiring the lens must be exciting and reaffirming of your decision to purchase it. It sounds like you're already enjoying the lens and getting some excellent results with it. Enjoy exploring the capabilities of your new lens further, and may it continue to inspire you to capture many more stunning images!
@@the_daniel_life ya I love it, the difference between the 80d and my old rebel T series I had is awesome, I love the big heavy heft of it. I’m taking it to canyonlands and arches national parks for a backpacking trip next week.
Hello. Thanks for the video. So if you didn't have either lens, and their only about $80 USD price difference now (refurbished) would you go with the new lens?
Both lenses are great for sensors up till 30mpx. For sensors with higher resolution better to have 24-70 ii of rf (for using with mirror less). Anyway, all lenses issued before 2012 will not show all advantages of new canon R5. So with sensors with 30 mpx and lower - good choice.
I bough the Mark 2 and the lens has a very noticeably loose front barrel when it's extended to 105mm / zoomed-in. Is that normal? It rattles when you shake it. I used to have the Mark 1 and I don't remember this being the case with the old version.
Hi is the flex for image stabilization of canon 24-105mm F1.4L version 1 same withe 24-105mm f1.4L version 2? Mine was broke keep on jumping when i turn Is On ..
Hey Daniel, great video. Sag mal ist es wirklich nen Kampf mit der Linse zu shooten wenn's dunkel wird? Ich möchte mir eine 6Dmarkii kaufen und lese überall das man da den ISO hoch pushen kann. Ich hatte eine apsc Camera, rebel t5i, leider kaputt gegangen und hatte natürlich mit dem Kit Linse 18-135 schon zu kämpfen. Ich hadere und schiele zur 24-70 2.8
the daniel life also da ich gerne Sonnenuntergänge fotografiere, die Skyline Manhattan bei Nacht von nyc plus Langzeitbelichtungen liebe wäre 2.8 angebracht. Habe aber auch mit ner 3.5 Blende bei Nacht fotografiert und die Photos waren nicht schlecht. Nur jetzt wendet sich das Blatt, Full Frame 6Dmarkii, ISO kannst hoch pushen was bei meiner rebel t5i natürlich nicht ging. Ich muss dann eh noch ne wide angle kaufen weil ich mal Sterne fotografieren will lach instagram.com/ninirockx/?hl=de
Hallo Nini, gut, wenn du ein Stativ dabei hast, dann wäre auch eine 4er Blende nicht schlecht. Ich fand bei dem 24-70mm den Zoom etwas zu gering um zu sagen, dass es ein guter Allrounder ist, der genug Brennweite abdeckt. Sobald die Sonne aufgeht brauchst du keine 2.8er Blende mehr und du hast mehr Brennweite. 2.8er Blende ist super um schöne Portrait zu schießen und auch wenn es darum geht bei Dunkelheit zu fotografieren. Für einen tollen Sternenhimmel kann ich dir das 24mm F/1.4L II empfehlen. Gruß, Daniel
Daniel, I've noticed that the new lens bulges or bubbles out slightly on the front of the lens. Is it safe to use a filter without it coming in contact with the lens? It looks like it would be very close or even possibly rub against it.
Thank you for this video! How does the zoom lens tube behave on the MK II after the two years? Does it also slide in and out on its own, like on the MK I? Recently, I bought a used MK I lens, in which the tube should not be so worn out-unfortunately it wasn't true (here is a video after receiving the lens: th-cam.com/video/jZd1pCb9ah4/w-d-xo.html ). That is a problem for me since I do not shoot/film horizontally that often. Is the zoom mechanism better on MK II? Is the lock/switch only for 24 mm or perhaps also for every other position between 24 mm and 105 mm?
You said it at 6:40, "I did not see the need for the new version..." Not many have seen the need for this obese, overpriced replacement. Great review as always!
I don't have the ability to take or display photos, but I can provide you with some information on the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM and its Mark II version. The Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM is a versatile lens known for its wide focal range and image stabilization. The Mark II version, Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM, is an updated model with improved optics and construction. Here are some key differences between the two: 1. **Optical Quality:** The Mark II version is designed with improved optics to deliver better image quality, reduced distortion, and improved sharpness, particularly at the edges of the frame. 2. **Construction:** The Mark II version features a more robust construction with additional weather sealing, making it more durable and resistant to environmental elements. 3. **Image Stabilization:** Both lenses come with image stabilization, but the Mark II version may have some improvements in this area for enhanced stability. 4. **Price:** Generally, the Mark II version is more expensive than the original version due to the improvements in optical quality and construction. When choosing between the two, consider your specific needs and budget. If optical quality and durability are crucial factors for you, the Mark II version might be worth the additional cost. If you are on a budget and the original version meets your requirements, it can still be a good choice. For a detailed and hands-on comparison, you might want to refer to photography websites, forums, or reviews where photographers share their experiences and sometimes provide image samples taken with both lenses.
Nice comparison video ! What do you think about the Sigma 24-104mm f/4 ART ? It is the go-to lens of Tony Northrup as well. He says it is Sharper & Brighter (T-stop, Transmission) than Canon's Mark I & II both. Should a Canon loyalist go for a 3rd party over OEM lens ? Do you trust Sigma's Quality Control ? Sigma is plagued with AF issues. I have 6D + 24-70mm f/4 L IS + 70-300 II Nano-USM + 40 STM and will now buy the 85mm f/1.4 IS L when it will be out in november.
Sigma discontinue their lenses constantly and they stop making spare parts so repairs will not be an option. There quality and workmanship in their products are inferior to name brand. I don't recommend any after market products.
@@the_daniel_life extra cost and there is no considerable improvements in image quality compared to the old one , only quiter image stabilizer if you shooting videos . And the newer one is bigger and heavier !!
мы? на весь интернет? :))) задрот, у тебя мания величия. Кстати, у меня Canon EF 24-105mm F/4L IS II USM уже давно есть, а ты всё копишь на него? Может в кредит возьмёшь, ущербное чучело?
Wearing a Nikon strap on a Canon camera is the most chaotic neutral thing I've ever seen.
Also thanks, helped me choose which one to buy.
It helps with deterring thieves 😂
@@adnmultimedia I bet you saw Kai W (DigitRev TV) take his 1Dx mkII out shooting this same lens in London. and just wanted t8 foll8w the fashion.
Increases dynamic range by two stops, I was told.
I have the version one and I'm very satisfied. It's my go to lens for general work.
I've got the early version, too. Very sharp lens.
I also have the Sigma art 24-105, which I fancy is very slightly better. But it's close.
Trouble is the Sigmas a LOT heavier to carry about.
I watched another review that covered one important aspect your review didn't pick up. The noise of stabilization. The original mk 1 is definitely noisey with stabilization on, this is a problem for video guys and gals with sound on. The new version is silent. My takeaway is that is the deal breaker if you are going to use this lens a lot for videos, if not everything else you said about both being very similar is true. And it is true that if you are primarily a stills person, I am, then the original is great, especially for the price. In the video you also mentioned that these lenses were "prime," I'm assuming you are meaning L quality. But prime in photographic language as you well know doesn't mean L quality. But I did get the mk 2 version should I shoot more video sometime.
Hello, thank you very much for that detailed feedback. Daniel
Greatings from Sachsenhausen FFM!
Just bought the OG 24-105 f4 from a nice Lady in Schwanheim for 250€s. With an absent Red Ring. (Being my first L, I kinda thought it was just a sticker / painted on.)
Other than that the Lens is 100% one of the first Shots I took at the darkest part of the blue hour of an on coming Straßenbahn 16 -> Offenbach was probably one of the best Fotos I've yet taken. It was taken at iso 3200 on a 5D mkII, and has some noise in the street, ant the nose ofvthe Tram, but its was not as distracting as i thought. The joke is knowing that the Lens fairs poorly in low light I wasn't expexting anything. So I just took it freehand, and to my surprise the image came out really sharp. The only ghosting / blur is visible on the Schaumainkai Streetsign. Its a bit ghosted, but zoomed in perfectly legable. Like I said this was like 5 maximum 10 minutes before nightfall.
I think I love this lens, and for 250€, when eveyone and their Dog wants 400€ for it, this was a no brainer.
Grüße zurück
Congratulations on your new purchase! It sounds like you got a great deal on the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L lens. Despite the missing red ring, it's still a fantastic lens known for its versatility and image quality.
It's impressive to hear that you were able to capture such a sharp and clear shot in challenging low-light conditions with your Canon 5D Mark II. The fact that the image came out well despite the lens's reputation for being less suited to low-light situations speaks to your skill as a photographer and the capabilities of the camera.
Getting such a great shot so quickly after acquiring the lens must be exciting and reaffirming of your decision to purchase it. It sounds like you're already enjoying the lens and getting some excellent results with it.
Enjoy exploring the capabilities of your new lens further, and may it continue to inspire you to capture many more stunning images!
I just bought version one last night for my 80D
Still a great lens and camera in 2024
@@the_daniel_life ya I love it, the difference between the 80d and my old rebel T series I had is awesome, I love the big heavy heft of it. I’m taking it to canyonlands and arches national parks for a backpacking trip next week.
Hello. Thanks for the video. So if you didn't have either lens, and their only about $80 USD price difference now (refurbished) would you go with the new lens?
Hello,
any time for the new version.
Regards,
Daniel
Have you done the comparison with RF of the same zoom range L and non-L series?
Nope.
th-cam.com/video/IEY73mlVE6s/w-d-xo.html
Check this review out
@@the_daniel_life
thank you for doing this video, your review saved me some money going with the v1 the sharpness wasn't enough of a difference to make me buy the v2
Hello, thanks for your feedback. Daniel
Today I own the RF 24-105mm
Both lenses are great for sensors up till 30mpx. For sensors with higher resolution better to have 24-70 ii of rf (for using with mirror less). Anyway, all lenses issued before 2012 will not show all advantages of new canon R5. So with sensors with 30 mpx and lower - good choice.
Why do you say that care to elaborate
I bough the Mark 2 and the lens has a very noticeably loose front barrel when it's extended to 105mm / zoomed-in. Is that normal? It rattles when you shake it. I used to have the Mark 1 and I don't remember this being the case with the old version.
Hello,
I did not notice any of these issues.
Did you buy a used or a new one?
Daniel
the daniel life It’s a brand new one :/
Hi is the flex for image stabilization of canon 24-105mm F1.4L version 1 same withe 24-105mm f1.4L version 2? Mine was broke keep on jumping when i turn Is On ..
1.4L version?
I don’t really get your question. Daniel
@@the_daniel_life yes sir. The 1st gen i mean. I think my flex is damage.. thats why im looking for compatibility of flex
@@DustyRiderTrailSeries I’m not 100 p sure. Maybe someone else might be able to answer your question. Otherwise Canon support. Daniel
Great and useful review, thank you!
Hey Daniel, great video. Sag mal ist es wirklich nen Kampf mit der Linse zu shooten wenn's dunkel wird? Ich möchte mir eine 6Dmarkii kaufen und lese überall das man da den ISO hoch pushen kann. Ich hatte eine apsc Camera, rebel t5i, leider kaputt gegangen und hatte natürlich mit dem Kit Linse 18-135 schon zu kämpfen. Ich hadere und schiele zur 24-70 2.8
+Nini RockX nimmst du denn viele deiner Projekte bei Dunkelheit auf?
the daniel life also da ich gerne Sonnenuntergänge fotografiere, die Skyline Manhattan bei Nacht von nyc plus Langzeitbelichtungen liebe wäre 2.8 angebracht. Habe aber auch mit ner 3.5 Blende bei Nacht fotografiert und die Photos waren nicht schlecht. Nur jetzt wendet sich das Blatt, Full Frame 6Dmarkii, ISO kannst hoch pushen was bei meiner rebel t5i natürlich nicht ging. Ich muss dann eh noch ne wide angle kaufen weil ich mal Sterne fotografieren will lach instagram.com/ninirockx/?hl=de
the daniel life 3.5 blende instagram.com/p/BKOPURPgiFk/
Helden der stadt
Hallo Nini,
gut, wenn du ein Stativ dabei hast, dann wäre auch eine 4er Blende nicht schlecht. Ich fand bei dem 24-70mm den Zoom etwas zu gering um zu sagen, dass es ein guter Allrounder ist, der genug Brennweite abdeckt.
Sobald die Sonne aufgeht brauchst du keine 2.8er Blende mehr und du hast mehr Brennweite.
2.8er Blende ist super um schöne Portrait zu schießen und auch wenn es darum geht bei Dunkelheit zu fotografieren. Für einen tollen Sternenhimmel kann ich dir das 24mm F/1.4L II empfehlen.
Gruß,
Daniel
Daniel, I've noticed that the new lens bulges or bubbles out slightly on the front of the lens. Is it safe to use a filter without it coming in contact with the lens? It looks like it would be very close or even possibly rub against it.
Hellp,
I recommend to use at least an UV-Filter on any lens which cost more than 500€.
Daniel
I have the old version however I don’t need to change it because they all have great features
Hey there, thanks for sharing your feedback. Daniel
Thank you for this video! How does the zoom lens tube behave on the MK II after the two years? Does it also slide in and out on its own, like on the MK I? Recently, I bought a used MK I lens, in which the tube should not be so worn out-unfortunately it wasn't true (here is a video after receiving the lens: th-cam.com/video/jZd1pCb9ah4/w-d-xo.html ). That is a problem for me since I do not shoot/film horizontally that often. Is the zoom mechanism better on MK II? Is the lock/switch only for 24 mm or perhaps also for every other position between 24 mm and 105 mm?
No the mark 2 has a lock that locks the zoom from creeping. The mark 1 had this problem for the ones that were abused and used.
You said it at 6:40, "I did not see the need for the new version..." Not many have seen the need for this obese, overpriced replacement. Great review as always!
Thanks a lot. The new one just feels better. Daniel
you should have done a comparison with same photos....in my opinion
I don't have the ability to take or display photos, but I can provide you with some information on the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM and its Mark II version.
The Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM is a versatile lens known for its wide focal range and image stabilization. The Mark II version, Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM, is an updated model with improved optics and construction.
Here are some key differences between the two:
1. **Optical Quality:** The Mark II version is designed with improved optics to deliver better image quality, reduced distortion, and improved sharpness, particularly at the edges of the frame.
2. **Construction:** The Mark II version features a more robust construction with additional weather sealing, making it more durable and resistant to environmental elements.
3. **Image Stabilization:** Both lenses come with image stabilization, but the Mark II version may have some improvements in this area for enhanced stability.
4. **Price:** Generally, the Mark II version is more expensive than the original version due to the improvements in optical quality and construction.
When choosing between the two, consider your specific needs and budget. If optical quality and durability are crucial factors for you, the Mark II version might be worth the additional cost. If you are on a budget and the original version meets your requirements, it can still be a good choice.
For a detailed and hands-on comparison, you might want to refer to photography websites, forums, or reviews where photographers share their experiences and sometimes provide image samples taken with both lenses.
Great review!
+navy navy thanks a lot. Daniel
I have😌 the old one 😬
Hope you like it. Daniel
Great Video Brother
Thank you. Daniel
Nice Video!
But why is old vs new written in german?
+Simon Irgendetwas Hello,
thanks. You mean the Thumbnail written on the German version?
I mean the thumpnail on to this video
That`s English. Daniel
🤷🏼♂️
Simon Irgendetwas ..ja genau
thank you for the review!!
What is a Nikon D 610 strap doing on a Mark 4 Body with 24-105mm ? i upgraded to Version 2 after 8 years of my Version 1 last month.
Did I hear you call this lens a prime twice?
I can’t remember
Yes he did and I was going to say the same thing! The result of doing too many videos and voiceovers may be!! :-)
Nice comparison video ! What do you think about the Sigma 24-104mm f/4 ART ? It is the go-to lens of Tony Northrup as well. He says it is Sharper & Brighter (T-stop, Transmission) than Canon's Mark I & II both. Should a Canon loyalist go for a 3rd party over OEM lens ? Do you trust Sigma's Quality Control ? Sigma is plagued with AF issues. I have 6D + 24-70mm f/4 L IS + 70-300 II Nano-USM + 40 STM and will now buy the 85mm f/1.4 IS L when it will be out in november.
Sigma discontinue their lenses constantly and they stop making spare parts so repairs will not be an option. There quality and workmanship in their products are inferior to name brand. I don't recommend any after market products.
I do prefer the first 24-105mm lens over the newer one.
Why? Regards, Daniel
@@the_daniel_life extra cost and there is no considerable improvements in image quality compared to the old one , only quiter image stabilizer if you shooting videos . And the newer one is bigger and heavier !!
never turn ring focus when on AF...
Both lenses have always manual focusing on being in autofocus mode as well.
Full time manual focus..
you use the wrong straps dude !! that's nikon one
I know.
5:03 a Canon using a strap to pretend to be a Nikon
Which is better between Canon 24-70mm f4L IS and 24--105mm f4L IS II vesrion?
II this one stands for two
@@the_daniel_life i know ll is stands for version 2?but which is better between Canon 24-70mm f4L and 24-105mm f4L Version 2?
有一款 ，24-105 stm 银圈
I've seen the MKI witht no red ring. Anyone know why?
I would not have purchased the Mark II if the IS on the Mark I did not die on me. Canon will no longer service the Mark I. :(
thanks for your feedback. Daniel
Spero di aver capito...non conosco l'inglese.
👍👍👍
Что за акцент? Индусы?
English please! Daniel
please, don't read , he is stupid drunk russian . it's a shame
здорово мы тебя смешали с дерьмом на весь интернет
мы? на весь интернет? :))) задрот, у тебя мания величия. Кстати, у меня Canon EF 24-105mm F/4L IS II USM уже давно есть, а ты всё копишь на него? Может в кредит возьмёшь, ущербное чучело?
Пётр Петров дружище, что говорит этот Васятка заебись объектив или лучше 24-70 f4 взять