Riemann approximation introduction | Accumulation and Riemann sums | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
  • Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing-and saving your progress-now: www.khanacadem...
    Approximating the area under a curve using some rectangles. This is called a "Riemann sum". Created by Sal Khan.
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacadem...
    Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacadem...
    AP Calculus AB on Khan Academy: Bill Scott uses Khan Academy to teach AP Calculus at Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts, and heÕs part of the teaching team that helped develop Khan AcademyÕs AP lessons. Phillips Academy was one of the first schools to teach AP nearly 60 years ago.
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy is a nonprofit with a mission to provide a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere. We believe learners of all ages should have unlimited access to free educational content they can master at their own pace. We use intelligent software, deep data analytics and intuitive user interfaces to help students and teachers around the world. Our resources cover preschool through early college education, including math, biology, chemistry, physics, economics, finance, history, grammar and more. We offer free personalized SAT test prep in partnership with the test developer, the College Board. Khan Academy has been translated into dozens of languages, and 100 million people use our platform worldwide every year. For more information, visit www.khanacademy.org, join us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter at @khanacademy. And remember, you can learn anything.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to Khan AcademyÕs AP Calculus AB channel: / channel
    Subscribe to Khan Academy: www.youtube.co...

ความคิดเห็น • 51

  • @hasanrants
    @hasanrants 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    thanks Sal, I'm watching this in 2024. You're the GOAT.

  • @minttea9466
    @minttea9466 8 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    i like how you said have fun

    • @Playcool18
      @Playcool18 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I m actually having lots of fun learning this, whereas during class I couldnt follow the teacher fast pacing.
      Which is why learning theory via videos is the future IMO.

    • @guoyuli6640
      @guoyuli6640 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Playcool18 Most of the teacher do not take time learning how to make lecture understandable or interesting, they just focus on the knowledge and “quiz and test”,this is why lost of lectures in schools are dreadful

  • @Youngegyptv
    @Youngegyptv 11 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Think you meant to say "1.5" instead of "1.25" at 4:31. I don't care though, I still love you. You're always there when my textbook fails me. :)

    • @deeptisrimaturi788
      @deeptisrimaturi788 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you know, on the khan academy website, they showed that he made that mistake.....so yeah!!

  • @JoshMadakor
    @JoshMadakor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    6:10 I don't wanna give up any of that "pink area" Sal..

  • @tootinyman
    @tootinyman 11 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great lesson, as always.

  • @hopesibeko8059
    @hopesibeko8059 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    the best way to introduce the work

  • @penaskarlriggy8974
    @penaskarlriggy8974 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this helped me so much thanks !!!! so useful

  • @HYPEREXTREAME
    @HYPEREXTREAME 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    can't wait for next lessons!

  • @ak-47520
    @ak-47520 ปีที่แล้ว

    So much more clearer now.

  • @oyinkan861
    @oyinkan861 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THANK YOU

  • @saurabhsingh-ow7ue
    @saurabhsingh-ow7ue 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you sir............

  • @ayanavadas2585
    @ayanavadas2585 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Concepts are much clear now 😌😌😌

  • @drallisimo34
    @drallisimo34 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    really cool!!!

  • @oliverburr8931
    @oliverburr8931 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    would it be more effective to take out delta x as a common factor once all the multiplications are laid out?

  • @zbint23
    @zbint23 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Why did you say 1.25 and 3.25 instead of 1.5 and 3.5.
    I'm gonna assume it was a mistake but just making sure there is no real reason.

    • @HoshinoMirai
      @HoshinoMirai 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well what is 1.5^2+1? He is right.

    • @mr-jookero2527
      @mr-jookero2527 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He’s khan

  • @Mo-qb5fb
    @Mo-qb5fb 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    why dont you just take delta x out to the front and put the rest of the function sums in the bracket

    • @admiralbaty
      @admiralbaty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      He effectively did that in the final step. The purpose of leaving them in is to illustrate how each delta-x functions as one of the terms for computing the area of the rectangle.

  • @daisyarechiga4992
    @daisyarechiga4992 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is it 4 rectangles?? When you subtract a and b do you always divide it by 4?

    • @bhanusinghal1918
      @bhanusinghal1918 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No, you can take as many rectangles as you want.

  • @NazbolCaliphDonaldaddeenTrump
    @NazbolCaliphDonaldaddeenTrump 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    how would I calculate the overestimate with this same exact example?

    • @leehernandez7555
      @leehernandez7555 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      President Donald J. Trump... at each delta x you form a rectangle and make it to where the rectangle's top right vertex is on the function. On that point is where you evaluate f(x).

    • @NazbolCaliphDonaldaddeenTrump
      @NazbolCaliphDonaldaddeenTrump 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lee Hernandez thank you very much!

    • @jesusllanas9318
      @jesusllanas9318 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      MQ 786 progress

  • @BrotherofWord
    @BrotherofWord 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the exact area under curve [1,3] = 9 2/3?

  • @otmanehamad2674
    @otmanehamad2674 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the king

  • @lubnafarah2788
    @lubnafarah2788 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do we not need to add on f(3) x 0.5
    Or is it not in the equation??

    • @jkbruin7304
      @jkbruin7304 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No because you're evaluating at the first endpoint so you don't include f(3).

  • @juliebradley1392
    @juliebradley1392 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you always want to have 4 rectangles to evaluate

    • @sulemanmazzar7555
      @sulemanmazzar7555 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      No you will be given an interval where you can find deltax and see how many rectangle you have

    • @carloscantu8547
      @carloscantu8547 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also (but this is probably way too late) the more triangles that you draw the better the approximate for the area is

    • @sulemanmazzar7555
      @sulemanmazzar7555 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Here you will need to use rectangles not triangles, but yes the more you have.. the better that is why we use the limit as the number of rectangle gets to infinity.

  • @enkephalin07
    @enkephalin07 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this method ever used again in Calc 2? It's not difficult to understand, it's just intensely tedious, esp after learning integration. Are there any instances in which integration techniques cannot be applied, and Riemann approximation has to be relied on?

  • @penebob1183
    @penebob1183 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    His Voice is so relaxing

  • @qdtv1030
    @qdtv1030 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why 4 as the width?

    • @mib6002
      @mib6002 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      4 is the number of rectangles

  • @alvinlepik5265
    @alvinlepik5265 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    These look like Darboux sums :o

    • @gxstly
      @gxstly 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alvin the Chipmunk Whats that?

  • @rogeriojunior9459
    @rogeriojunior9459 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quarentena

  • @ebrimaba5140
    @ebrimaba5140 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pls make the screen white

  • @kundurthisaikrishna2363
    @kundurthisaikrishna2363 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can u take the exactly 4 rectangles ?

    • @williamchen6882
      @williamchen6882 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      take the difference of a to b then divide by 4. After, add that to your a untill you get to b

  • @ajferrer96
    @ajferrer96 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    can u work on not repeating the same 2 words so many times while you're writing something, its kinda annoying

    • @davidhuang5645
      @davidhuang5645 8 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      +ajferrer96 Honestly stop being so picky. So many people have found this useful. He's doing it so it solidifies in your head.

    • @malia8819
      @malia8819 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He's a verbal processor. Back off.

  • @udit410
    @udit410 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    wrong explanation

    • @miao16
      @miao16 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Study With You ...congratulations?