Statutory Interpretation Rules of Interpretation

www.thelawbank.co.uk - The second of a series of videos looking at Statutory Interpretation. This one looks at the rules of interpretation and although long and at times complex tries to deal with all the key issues in one hit.

[@Joat_ent]

I really wish for more thorough videos like this one, it really helps when someone who actually understands the law teaches you about it.

[@pweddilana9261]

This series on statutory interpretation was very very helpful! Thank you so much!

[@nairnshelly]

I wish you were my lecturer. Excellent presentation. I have a clearer understanding of the approach. Thank you.

[@jamesbogart]

Your two lectures on this subject are quite brilliant in transparency .

[@iammcwaffles5514]

This video truly helped me understand this part of the law. Thank you so much!

[@zerojokez]

Thank GOD!!!! For the Law Bank!!!! seriously

[@user-qj5pc4pj9k]

Your videos are brilliant. All books go into the bin. Merry Christmas and happy new year to you and your family.

[@esmeevestjens9456]

This is very helpful, thank you for clearing this up!

[@amyxox]

This lecture is great! Saving GDL students 7 years on! 😅

[@TheLawBank]

I will try and get them all done before your exams in May

[@elle_la_vie]

this is so good. thank you very much for doing this video. this topic is now a lot clearer to me cause of your video. your explanation is very direct.

[@mzeesafaritv850]

Awesome delivery. Very Impressive!

[@mrs.lorijohnson]

Great channel, Clearer understanding for Statutory Interpretation. Thank You :)

[@DJE9684]

Brilliant lecture. Thank you.

[@latifah2163]

Omg I have heard a teacher so clear like you, its been so helpful, thank you.

[@jammymancy8637]

Great channel, huge help. Mocks tomorrow and this has been perfect!

[@sorankurdi]

great video, will look out for more of your videos

[@akashameer2271]

What an outstanding explanation, thank you Sir

[@keilanatalierose]

Thank you for this, so helpful

[@shafiqs2561]

YOU ARE NO DOUBT A BOSS ON INTERPRETATION...

[@faridqasimy5351]

Thanks this is a great channel.

[@TravelousA]

You are great lecturer. Thanks

[@rwhale6339]

This is really helpful, thank you!

[@cutefluffball]

Needed this

[@ThisDJ808]

Thank you this was really helpful

[@yesk2318]

👌👍❤️ awesome session. Love from an India law student.

[@beckyjohn6127]

Have you done a video on aids to statutory Interpretation and also the rule of language?

[@hazelkmorgan]

AWESOME! AWESOME! AWESOME!

[@konhunmaye9861]

Thank you!

[@TheLawBank]

No it is the next one to be done in the next week.

[@ludamcmullan8339]

Brilliant! Thank you!

[@ThisDJ808]

Hey, do you have a citation for whitely v chappell? I can not find this on Westlaw, and want to use it as an example of the literal rule. ANYONE?.....

[@123vic321vic]

Hi, please can you make a video on aids to interpretation?

[@girlygirly382]

great video xxx

[@lostheroes8704]

Amazing!

[@jujuaddo2531]

thank you very much

[@tacoadele7877]

so helpful!

[@s.plunkett8051]

Thank you ❤

[@jujuaddo2531]

however, can you please elaborate more on the purposive approach

[@mayeeviee223]

You are amazing!

[@dadddydm]

Wow,nicely explained

[@xTenshiAi]

this is very helpful thanks!! please make one on aids

[@elliemorley8302]

This is super clear, helped me with understanding the rules. But still struggling to identify these rules when looking at case reports, any advice?

[@TheLawBank]

What do you mean? Do mean when reading a case you don’t know which rule has been used?

[@elliemorley8302]

@@TheLawBank Sorry reading that back I realised I was super vague! When reading the decisions of judges is case reports we're asked to identify which rules of construciton the judges have applied. I struggle with identifying these, do you have any advice? Should I be looking for keywords?

[@abokefredamary6910]

best explanations ever

[@josephusplutocrat4550]

Thanks Law Bank

[@sihemotmanetelba9655]

Thank you very much.

[@weixian.tan.99]

Thank you 🙏

[@deimantesidla7094]

Have you published the aids that they use already ? I cant seem to find it...

[@arthurchakanyuka496]

brilliant

[@ss-3662]

Thank you so much. I have a final exam tomorrow. Wish me luck

[@prophetaaron5170]

This is Helpful

[@seweetgirlnay]

God bless you!!

[@rozalina531]

💕🙏🏻💕

[@CafeMelal]

Thank you

[@francollins4036]

Excellent

[@TheLawBank]

Thanks

[@CassandraLoizou]

I might actually pass my exam now lol

[@hazelkmorgan]

Has the one on aids been posted?

[@cilama2174]

are judges obliged to follow these rules?

[@mohsinalikhan625]

Why did he stopped making vedios ?

[@JoshGProductions]

Aids to Interpretation?

[@khevishgopaul1983]

aids to statutory int??

[@simm8602]

The literal rule is meant to be used even if it leads to an absurdity, but the golden rule can be used if the use of the literal rule would lead to an absurdity.
Does this mean that the judges can decide how big of an absurdity there would have to be before using the golden rule ?

[@christinemomanyi3544]

I wanted to answer you but this is from three years ago😭😭

[@Growwitholiviar]

@@christinemomanyi3544please answer it

[@TheLawBank]

Judges have discretion to decide what counts as an “absurdity” . So the threshold may vary from judge to judge. This is often a criticism of using anything but the literal rule as it makes the law hard to predict and possibly inconsistent. I hope that helps.

[@saraswatkin9226]

Since Brexit EU law does not apply does it?

[@evajayme7746]

Can you give me. Certificate after I study and pay to you? Because I simply understand you clearly. Thank u

[@evajayme7746]

Dear Sir. I like to study with you Directly. How much. Sir. In 80 credits?

[@londonrider3219]

thank you

[@TheLawBank]

😊

[@irdinajailani6360]

Wonderful explanation! Thank you very much :)

[@TheLawBank]

You're very welcome!

[@antibreeder1m]

Who here is full of mischief? We have a rule for that!! haha

[@mohammedjunaid9630]

got exam in 2 days

[@Petitz]

Yall tryna be legal practitioners or sumn?
Brazy

[@lordmountbatten154]

Thank you!

[@TheLawBank]

You're welcome!