Hong Kong was ceded to Britain in perpetuity. Beijing completely broke their promise on HK, therefore without Independence, the HK that we have known is gone.
利泰大樓仍然有很多老鼠。 CONFIDENTIAL AND URGENT! From: An owner of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 太子道西101-107號利泰大樓業主 Mobile Phone No.: To: The Legislative Council of the HKSAR, the Public Complaints Office and all members of the Legislative Council of the HKSAR Dear All, Re: Complaints about the Unauthorized Use of the Public/Common Areas at Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong and/or Other Public/Common Areas of Lee Tai Building by the Owner/Tenant of G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building and/or Other Relevant Owners/Tenants of Lee Tai Building and Complaints about the Noises and Vibrations caused by the Owner/Tenant of G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building and/or Other Relevant Owners/Tenants of Lee Tai Building [檔案編號：2-4933763902 (assigned by 1823)] [檔案編號：EP3/K03/RE/00034760-18 (assigned by EPD)] The case number assigned by The Ombudsman is OMB2019/1791. 投訴太子道西101-107號利泰大廈地下食肆懷疑違例改建抽風系統 (檔案編號：2-4933763902 assigned by FEHD) Complaints against the Buildings Department Complaints against Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun and Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong Complaints against Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong With reference to the captioned, the attached e-mails and the related documents, I understand that it may not be easy to fully resolve all the issues of my complaints before the end of November, 2020. However, as the Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong would leave the Legislative Council in December, 2020, the things which you can do and must do immediately are as follows: 1. Focus on the content and the questions in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department of Hong Kong; 2. Focus on the responses of the Buildings Department in the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, with reference no.: EB/5120/61/T02N; 3. Focus on my arguments relating to the content and the questions mentioned in 1. above and/or the responses of the Buildings Department mentioned in 2. above. Such arguments are stated in my previous e-mails sent to you. 4. Understand why the Buildings Department must fully understand the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 Building Management Ordinance of the Laws of Hong Kong including section 18 and section 34I etc. of CAP 344 of the Laws of Hong Kong for executing any of its duties relating to unauthorized building works or approval of works/drawings etc.. 5. Summon 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) to testify and give evidence as per Article 73 of the Basic Law with respect to the captioned complaints and ask 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) the following question(s): "Has 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building as per Cap 344 Building Management Ordinance for converting the relevant common parts of Lee Tai Building in the way mentioned before for its own use? If so, 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) is to provide all the relevant evidence(s) as per Article 73 of the Basic Law." 6. Ask the Buildings Department the relevant questions relating to the captioned and/or the matters/issues mentioned above including, but not limited to, those questions in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 mentioned in 1. above and request the Buildings Department to respond to such questions properly and immediately; 7. Decide whether the Buildings Department has violated Article 64 of the Basic Law and/or subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 Buildings Ordinance and/or any other enactment(s); www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html Article 64 of the Basic Law: The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must abide by the law and be accountable to the Legislative Council of the Region: it shall implement laws passed by the Council and already in force; it shall present regular policy addresses to the Council; it shall answer questions raised by members of the Council; ............................. www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001 Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance 16.Grounds on which approval or consent may be refused (1)The Building Authority may refuse to give his approval of any plans of building works where- ........................................................................... (d)the carrying out of the building works shown thereon would contravene the provisions of this Ordinance or of any other enactment, or would contravene any approved or draft plan prepared under the Town Planning Ordinance (Cap. 131); 8. Decide whether Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, fail to execute some of their powers and duties as per Article 73 of the Basic Law; 9. Ask Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun and Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong Complaints against Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong the relevant questions relating to the matters/issues mentioned above and request them to respond to such questions immediately. Some of the documents/e-mails mentioned above are attached to this e-mail for your easy reference. These documents/e-mails were sent to you previously. Of course, they are not exhaustive. The following weblinks are attached for your easy reference: www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001 www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344 www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344?xpid=ID_1438403038456_002 I do not consent to the disclosure of any part of any information sent or to be sent to you by me to anyone except the legislative councillors and/or the personnel handling my complaints, because I have to protect my privacy. From: An owner of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 太子道西101-107號利泰大樓業主 Mobile Phone No.:
"Why do we have to be something that we are not." 聽到真系流眼淚。
最大嘅問題你老竇老母都係中國人⋯⋯咁唯有整容囉染金頭髮帶藍色隱形眼鏡
@@bblo3523 香港都有一大班人無中國血統, 但世世代代住喺香港, 身份認同只有香港人
@@moshnnnn 香港是中国土地，不想做中国人滚去英国做难民去
@@jiannansanyue 你又為什麼在使用境外勢力的youtube， 明明身在國家之中， 卻違反國家的規定翻牆出來， 你是對中國有什麼不滿嗎？ 沒有黨你什麼都不是！
@@moshnnnn 香港都有一大班人無中國血統, 但世世代代住喺香港----3%
阿叔好好人，講說話好實在 👍
唔理係幾時首播，總之一次串燒所有相關主題，高質又多面，多謝蘋果果籽！
人口三萬，少過太古城，卻人人都是精英，把直布罷陀治理得井井有條。
阿叔做我們的特首好啦，講話句句到點，清醒過三條七
係清醒過同佢差不多年紀 仍在香港嗰班唔醒嘅就真
咁，入上水圍揾，🤭
天氣很好 不錯
好靚嘅郵筒！香港曾經有過！
好地方，優美好中意👍❤
“No need to interact...to observe respectfully” 絕對正確 無論是講緊馬騮定人
I wish Hong Kong can be like Gibraltar 🇬🇮👍👍👍
香港人抄襲廣州話。香這個字圍頭話（香港話）讀Hong，廣州話讀hoeng。
可憐，香港喱抄襲偷竊盜取廣州話來講，而且一句圍頭話（香港話）都不敢講。
圍頭話是深圳人發明的廣府話分支。圍頭話怎會不算廣東話。廣東話由廣府話、潮汕話同客家話組成。圍頭人是起源深圳的廣東人，圍頭話也屬於粵語廣府話的分支，同理廣州話也是廣東話中廣府話的分支。圍頭話也是廣東話。所以香港人為何不說粵語圍頭話，而要抄襲偷竊盜取粵語廣州話。
香港喱最鍾意偷來講的 撚 這個粗口都是廣州話粗口，圍頭話係冇架。香港人講圍頭話啦，我地澳門人一個字都唔識聽
香港人講返圍頭話啦 自卑唔講圍頭話真可憐
香港人崇拜廣州話，所以抄襲了廣州話。香港本土語言係圍頭話，但係你叫香港人講圍頭話，香港人會唔肯講。因為香港人崇拜廣州話覺得廣州話高雅，厭棄香港話（圍頭話）難聽老土唔入流。
茶樓、點心、腸粉、冰室係香港人抄襲偷盜廣州嘅嘢 我澳門人真係睇唔慣。冰室，又叫冰廳，廣州話用以稱呼冷飲店。其是南粵地方一種主要售賣冷飲、雪糕及沙冰等冷凍食品的飲食場所，起源發跡於廣州。在香港流行於1950至1960年代，被認為是茶餐廳的前身[1][2]。過往廣州的冰室會經營雪糕、凍奶、冰水，兼營咖啡、奶茶等熱飲和西餅麵包
茶樓雲吞早茶腸粉炒粉全部都係香港人抄襲廣州
澳門人香港人說的廣東話學術上最準確定義
叫作廣州話（澳門官方政府文書也寫作廣州話）廣州話英文叫Cantonese
Canton就是廣州英文舊稱
當然現在你也可以看到許多痕跡
譬如廣州機場代號是CAN
廣州塔英文叫Canton Tower
我係澳門人 澳門一直係廣府話/廣州話地區
但香港唔係 香港一百年前還在講圍頭話（香港話） 一百年前澳門和廣州影響力遠遠高過香港
香港人放棄圍頭話學我地講廣州話 香港人講廣東話口音非常難聽好多懶音（畢竟係抄返黎）
廣東話本身係錯誤名稱
魯迅講過：一直如此 便是對嗎
潮州都係廣東 梅州又係廣東
唔通潮州話梅州話都係廣府話？
呢個語言係名副其實嘅廣州話
我作為澳門高質大學生鍾意講求學術
希望啲ON9⃣️唔好介意
東網：香港人崇拜廣州話，不說圍頭話，令到香港話（圍頭話）消失th-cam.com/video/MLBOP4h-jec/w-d-xo.html
不可能
醒覺已太遲！
@@ほしのみやこ中國香港人應該 香港根本就係多省雲集，邊啲人多，就講邊度嘅話囉！
偷你個死人頭咩！（廣州話）
@@lktsang4510 佢每次都複制同貼上呢句上嚟，唔洗理佢
好喜欢果籽这些有趣的内容
我對佢嘅認識由個飛機場開始
正呀，等我過嚟探下你先。
人地叫似返個人生活， 香港係豬棚到生存
真係唔明點解要去 Gibraltar 問呢啲問題, 不嬲居住問題都係經濟大城市先有
好羨慕❤️❤️❤️
醒醒，香港，台湾不是直布罗陀
平行時空的澳門仲差唔多
澳门都冇英属殖民地历史……
澳門好佢地好多
、懵盛盛。好過o門。起碼揾定。蒙查查。不用要固左右而言它。
@@Hi-nf2uv 你澳門人?吾知就吾好代表澳門人講野。係咁先
外Q人。
直布羅陀樂陀絕對比香港人幸運，按道理，香港島係割讓畀英國既，而九龍則係租借地，但一回歸，就連香港島都送返畀大陸.......
九龍半島也是永久割讓的，新界是租的。
@@jasonjung0614 應該交還牛屎佬就可以留返九龍同港島
講到咁好，大家快D去啦，香港人個個移民創業都係開餐廳，冇D新意。大把地方搵兩餐都冇問題啦。
I wanna visit Gibraltar. Pretty interesting video.
好中意呢個系列～
有賭業，地方細，人口少。好明顯係歐洲嘅澳門。
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
歐洲嘅澳門係Monaco 蒙地卡羅
好明顯係歐洲嘅澳門。你冇乜知識。
Could you please date the experiences on these discovery channel? Thanks for educational purposes… seems it took place pre covid?
Good graphics to illustrate the plane landing
幸福
So like Hong kong
直布羅陀不像香港，英國🇬🇧絕對讓直布羅陀自主，人民不受太多政治困擾l
好想去直布羅陀呀
How good is “ceded in perpetuity”
Hong Kong was ceded to Britain in perpetuity. Beijing completely broke their promise on HK, therefore without Independence, the HK that we have known is gone.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
看看香港，唉⋯
諗起以前captv
加泰人要飲西水思源
直過直布羅陀~~
現在不只每天150人了！😡🤬🤯😤😱
仲有内地專才計劃
好似以前啟德機場
14:24 呢Part好應景
直布羅陀其實同香港好似，唔單只兩方都曾被英國統治，有着差唔多嘅文化，而且都面臨往同樣問題，如房價高企、上面有大國意圖吞併等，但唔同嘅係，直布羅陀公民係英國下有權做選擇，而香港係中共下只能被赤化，不禁感到無奈，希望香港人早日能同直布羅陀人一樣有權做選擇同享有民主。
（@ほしの みやこ 你個中共五毛粉紅狗成撚日Copy and Paste，話咩香港人無權用粵語，抄襲廣東話，語言就係不停改進同抄寫而來，照你咁講全世界人都抄襲緊幾百萬年前智人嘅語言啫，所以所有人都冇權用？根本自相矛盾！你又有權用撚日文啊？日文都係咁進化而嚟咋！你用咪啫係自打嘴巴？最後，我哋講咩關你撚事，收完五毛就返大陸玩抖音打拼音啦屌你老母臭閪見撚到都谷鬼氣！
👍
I envied why you so smart?
我是从大陆过来的，其实，如果可以，我还是建议香港人移民加拿大（美国相对难一些），这些小国家，容易受影响，既然选择出来了，争取尽量一步到位吧
加拿大大部份地区太凍不宜年長人
@@amandamak8808 如果是年长的人，我个人建议还是不要折腾了。。。让年轻人出去吧。。。。唉。。。
問的好，為什麼我們要成為不想成為的人，香港人為什麼？同樣問題，
好简单 因为直布罗陀有国民教育~
身在福中不知福，世界上不公平的事多得去，能成为一个特区居民已经好唔错了
看完⋯ 只會更想念英國🇬🇧
移民啊，想念英国总督大人？
@@祝枝山-o2m 真香港人都有BNO，喜歡💕什麼時候返祖家，都可以⋯⋯
@碳酸钙 典？所愛的是英國🇬🇧的法典、歷史
祖？！父祖輩很早已經是英國🇬🇧屬土公民！
@@freddyfreddy3177 呵呵，洋大人赐的东西就是香。你把英国当家，英国人把你当家人吗？？殖民地的二等公民还当出优越感了？？
听了二等公民的心酸故事，兄弟我打心底支持你回到英国
11:40 請問咩西班牙文歌?
當年廣機場一樣。 每日早上八點所有車輪停駛 。候飛機經過。
估唔到個節目咁具資訊性同有質素。
可惜当今的英国不再强大，不然香港不至于现在这样，同情理解你们
英國嘅😅紅色電話亭😅以前香港都有😢
住几天好，住久些呢？
和以前香港太相似。
🚷老伯你錯了，香港只有新界是租借99年，港島九龍是永久割讓
大清早亡了 明白吗
@@賴清德-i3w 亡了不分尸何时分尸
弱肉强食优胜劣汰
住幾個月應該唔錯😄
移民英国有点难。我有一个好想法，移民去直布罗陀，不就间接变成英国人了吗？
難？香港好多人可以去啦⋯⋯
不是英國人，只是國籍
直布羅拕 一國兩制， 直人治直
LOL
可以點移直布？？
错！香港95%土地租借而來？1840年南京条约永久割让香港島；1860年北京条约永久割让九龙界限街以南；1898年「新界拓展条约」租借新界99年。
其实正式来讲英国可以只归还新界以及界限街以北土地。我有亲戚甚至特等搬过港岛以为可以唔使回归。是英国人主动放手。
所以直布罗陀要有法例不准英国单方面改变当地未来。但香港就从来不被中英重视。香港亦都冇权改变。
@@taotao98103 也不是吧，邓说不还就打过去了啊。
@@potatocurry849 也不能这样說，只留下九龍和港岛實在沒有什麼發展空間才放棄吧。而鄧小平說不还就攻过去，大概是說笑或者是誤傳吧， 那時的中國大概也不能 有大規模戰爭，他們还要外國公司在那開工廠。
@@yiyichung746 你要看当时背景。中美蜜月期，刚打完越南交过投名状，英国根本没办法。。形势逼人强。
口裏說愛國？
心裏愛英國！
口說愛終國？
生活在美國！
所以呢？ 中國變成咁點愛？
@@尤茵 所以呢,, 你要走？
多数講普通話，香港高官爱港受國子女多数去英果1自認爱國爱港人士鍾意志加拿大一澳一川!譚常委子去澳卅，曾主席爱加拿大.」689和777子女去什麽地方教育?
直布羅陀人咪一樣要英國
藍絲成日罵英國，但其實係唔係香港人都好，大家一樣都喜歡&選擇英國
更證明大家不是崇洋才喜歡英國統治，英國統治並非完美，只不過是大家都不喜歡獨裁政權如中共
有錢果D藍絲轉個頭自己都移民去英國啦😒 口講說不身體卻很誠實
9成藍絲 有BNO
香港人抄襲廣州話。香這個字圍頭話（香港話）讀Hong，廣州話讀hoeng。
可憐，香港喱抄襲偷竊盜取廣州話來講，而且一句圍頭話（香港話）都不敢講。
圍頭話是深圳人發明的廣府話分支。圍頭話怎會不算廣東話。廣東話由廣府話、潮汕話同客家話組成。圍頭人是起源深圳的廣東人，圍頭話也屬於粵語廣府話的分支，同理廣州話也是廣東話中廣府話的分支。圍頭話也是廣東話。所以香港人為何不說粵語圍頭話，而要抄襲偷竊盜取粵語廣州話。
香港喱最鍾意偷來講的 撚 這個粗口都是廣州話粗口，圍頭話係冇架。香港人講圍頭話啦，我地澳門人一個字都唔識聽
香港人講返圍頭話啦 自卑唔講圍頭話真可憐
香港人崇拜廣州話，所以抄襲了廣州話。香港本土語言係圍頭話，但係你叫香港人講圍頭話，香港人會唔肯講。因為香港人崇拜廣州話覺得廣州話高雅，厭棄香港話（圍頭話）難聽老土唔入流。
茶樓、點心、腸粉、冰室係香港人抄襲偷盜廣州嘅嘢 我澳門人真係睇唔慣。冰室，又叫冰廳，廣州話用以稱呼冷飲店。其是南粵地方一種主要售賣冷飲、雪糕及沙冰等冷凍食品的飲食場所，起源發跡於廣州。在香港流行於1950至1960年代，被認為是茶餐廳的前身[1][2]。過往廣州的冰室會經營雪糕、凍奶、冰水，兼營咖啡、奶茶等熱飲和西餅麵包
茶樓雲吞早茶腸粉炒粉全部都係香港人抄襲廣州
澳門人香港人說的廣東話學術上最準確定義
叫作廣州話（澳門官方政府文書也寫作廣州話）廣州話英文叫Cantonese
Canton就是廣州英文舊稱
當然現在你也可以看到許多痕跡
譬如廣州機場代號是CAN
廣州塔英文叫Canton Tower
我係澳門人 澳門一直係廣府話/廣州話地區
但香港唔係 香港一百年前還在講圍頭話（香港話） 一百年前澳門和廣州影響力遠遠高過香港
香港人放棄圍頭話學我地講廣州話 香港人講廣東話口音非常難聽好多懶音（畢竟係抄返黎）
廣東話本身係錯誤名稱
魯迅講過：一直如此 便是對嗎
潮州都係廣東 梅州又係廣東
唔通潮州話梅州話都係廣府話？
呢個語言係名副其實嘅廣州話
我作為澳門高質大學生鍾意講求學術
希望啲ON9⃣️唔好介意
東網：香港人崇拜廣州話，不說圍頭話，令到香港話（圍頭話）消失th-cam.com/video/MLBOP4h-jec/w-d-xo.html
@@stc2858 果然黃絲講野唔洗講證據
@@peterchow2166 姐係你有bno
其實香港人就係香港人, 唔係D 咩自古以黎就乜乜乜既人種
尊駕父母先輩從哪到香港？🤔
人若感覺到10幾20年後又會出現香港嘅住屋問題
去那裡做乞丐或做量地官！
做完官!去英國， 愛爾蘭 試下是否適合!最後反九龍，
公屋都好乾淨，香港公屋區就冇吟乾淨.
全國得三萬人垃圾會有幾多？~香港一個天水圍都吾只啦🤣
成個制度，憲法，政治，體系都係香港人夢寐以求。
看到 这些香港人的留言我是惊呆了。
那就別看了，真的沒有人逼你
直布羅陀算是個風景優美生活寧靜的小地方, 但得油尖旺咁大, 管治3萬人比澳門仲少, 同有超過7百萬人嘅香港比少250倍人, 需要同要面對嘅問題都好難直接比較。如果只求居住的地方寬敞，相信地球上很多地方都可滿足到, 甚至乎香港有D單位嘅價錢可以在南美買個島住, 點解唔係咁多人去? 因為交通唔方便或設施唔完善囉。香港繁華先進便捷國際級大都會, 但弊處是居住環境狹窄樓價貴, 針無兩頭利, 這就是代價之ㄧ, 如果香港既繁華樓價又低, 點止有7百萬居民呀, 過千萬人湧咗入香港啦。叧外香港人注意嘅教育和醫療方面呢? 得油尖旺咁大, 會有幾多間醫院幾多専科醫生? 如果直布羅陀提供唔到適切治療，要去英國定西班牙醫治, 醫療費點計? 一個普通人健健康康, 甘於過平淡寜靜的生活, 居於世上很多地方都可以是樂土。但有一樣香港和直布羅陀是極相同的, 就是對相鄰的大陸和西班牙都絶對依賴，不可或缺, 物資和人流緊扣在ㄧ起。最不同是直布羅陀人未必同西班牙人有血源種族關係，但90%香港人同内地人一樣是中華民族。
分析得好好
@Natee Chan ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
直布羅陀比香港幸運 因為無民主回歸西班牙
住得 耐了會很 悶，太細了兩小時可反轉整個島什麼 娛樂都沒有要過西班牙。😴
北上消遣呢下好似
時間會改善。只有極權各倒退。
舊片
嗰到政府有收入就俾市民洗
香港政府有收入攞曬去起啲冇作用嘅嘢…
年青一代 想住公屋也要等五至二十年
😢😮香港納稅人😮😢俾左錢起公屋😢😮被分割😮😢等公屋😮😢就要等好耐😢😮
離開香港，會終生遺憾，不信?試試看。
言重/可以去到試一年.先買楼?試幾個月不適應，!可回港，想發達． 搵好多錢1 去旅行試兩個星期/
直布罗陀没有和香港的可比性吧
Btw，想去哪里都是他们的自由啦，不过我发现想离开的人好像屁民比较多
西班牙也有戰狼外交 LOL
香港無英國人非香港⋯⋯
香港人需要英國皇室、皇室需要香港人⋯⋯
英國懂人道，芝麻講它的自私，分化，霸道，霸業
好憎西班牙生人霸死地，貪人有錢想吞人地
無KFC 無M記 無Pizza Hut, 無戲院，無SASA, 23年惨!!
Hahaha😂
幾時都係話、食外國香腸好味過食中國臘腸😄😄😄😄😄😄
归根结底是西班牙不够强，如果西班牙又有了无敌舰队，英国也只能放弃直布罗陀吧
西班牙的無敵艦隊當年就是敗給了英國。現如今西班牙的發展程度確實也不如英國。
香港死因全因太過多中華膠和港奸了 !
clss
每日150個, 很多來到香港之後都掙到錢, 有d住公屋, 有的由公屋搬去居屋或買私樓, 基本上每日150個都是行香港人以前的舊路,,,,,,,,,,但今日香港的生活環境.........點同以前比。晒氣。有錢個班大陸人根本可以直接去白人國家............點解要來香港產子...或生活10年先再移民............因為想扮香港人囉。
直布羅陀永不能脫英獨立。
直布羅陀，新加坡，香港，孟買，蘇爾士，都是英裔步儲海權基地，希望千秋萬代控制。
時不予汝。
Take away your jealousy or envy, just put things in perspective: 7,000,000 people vs less than 30,000!
都话了，黑头发黄皮肤。不要偷换概念。
肯定好食用。咁肥。
還有一個福地是新加坡，也曾是英國的殖民地！
@碳酸钙 我覺得還是和當地人的治理方式有關係
哪个地方都有有钱人，个人的生活水平只和个人有关
為何他在當地仍然看cctvb? 為何他說自己是匪國人, 而不是說香港人呢? 他是藍人!
大中華膠就係咁樣，但唔等於認同中共
放棄香港身分 快去
利泰大樓仍然有很多老鼠。
CONFIDENTIAL AND URGENT!
From: An owner of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 太子道西101-107號利泰大樓業主
Mobile Phone No.:
To: The Legislative Council of the HKSAR, the Public Complaints Office and all members of the Legislative Council of the HKSAR
Dear All,
Re: Complaints about the Unauthorized Use of the Public/Common Areas at Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong and/or Other Public/Common Areas of Lee Tai Building by the Owner/Tenant of G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building and/or Other Relevant Owners/Tenants of Lee Tai Building and Complaints about the Noises and Vibrations caused by the Owner/Tenant of G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building and/or Other Relevant Owners/Tenants of Lee Tai Building [檔案編號：2-4933763902 (assigned by 1823)] [檔案編號：EP3/K03/RE/00034760-18 (assigned by EPD)] The case number assigned by The Ombudsman is OMB2019/1791. 投訴太子道西101-107號利泰大廈地下食肆懷疑違例改建抽風系統 (檔案編號：2-4933763902 assigned by FEHD)
Complaints against the Buildings Department
Complaints against Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun and Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong
Complaints against Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong
With reference to the captioned, the attached e-mails and the related documents, I understand that it may not be easy to fully resolve all the issues of my complaints before the end of November, 2020. However, as the Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong would leave the Legislative Council in December, 2020, the things which you can do and must do immediately are as follows:
1. Focus on the content and the questions in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department of Hong Kong;
2. Focus on the responses of the Buildings Department in the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, with reference no.: EB/5120/61/T02N;
3. Focus on my arguments relating to the content and the questions mentioned in 1. above and/or the responses of the Buildings Department mentioned in 2. above. Such arguments are stated in my previous e-mails sent to you.
4. Understand why the Buildings Department must fully understand the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 Building Management Ordinance of the Laws of Hong Kong including section 18 and section 34I etc. of CAP 344 of the Laws of Hong Kong for executing any of its duties relating to unauthorized building works or approval of works/drawings etc..
5. Summon 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) to testify and give evidence as per Article 73 of the Basic Law with respect to the captioned complaints and ask 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) the following question(s):
"Has 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building as per Cap 344 Building Management Ordinance for converting the relevant common parts of Lee Tai Building in the way mentioned before for its own use? If so, 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) is to provide all the relevant evidence(s) as per Article 73 of the Basic Law."
6. Ask the Buildings Department the relevant questions relating to the captioned and/or the matters/issues mentioned above including, but not limited to, those questions in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 mentioned in 1. above and request the Buildings Department to respond to such questions properly and immediately;
7. Decide whether the Buildings Department has violated Article 64 of the Basic Law and/or subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 Buildings Ordinance and/or any other enactment(s);
www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html
Article 64 of the Basic Law:
The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must abide by the law and be accountable to the Legislative Council of the Region: it shall implement laws passed by the Council and already in force; it shall present regular policy addresses to the Council; it shall answer questions raised by members of the Council; .............................
www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001
Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance
16.Grounds on which approval or consent may be refused
(1)The Building Authority may refuse to give his approval of any plans of building works where-
...........................................................................
(d)the carrying out of the building works shown thereon would contravene the provisions of this Ordinance or of any other enactment, or would contravene any approved or draft plan prepared under the Town Planning Ordinance (Cap. 131);
8. Decide whether Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, fail to execute some of their powers and duties as per Article 73 of the Basic Law;
9. Ask Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun and Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong
Complaints against Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong the relevant questions relating to the matters/issues mentioned above and request them to respond to such questions immediately.
Some of the documents/e-mails mentioned above are attached to this e-mail for your easy reference. These documents/e-mails were sent to you previously. Of course, they are not exhaustive.
The following weblinks are attached for your easy reference:
www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html
www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001
www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344
www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344?xpid=ID_1438403038456_002
I do not consent to the disclosure of any part of any information sent or to be sent to you by me to anyone except the legislative councillors and/or the personnel handling my complaints, because I have to protect my privacy.
From: An owner of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 太子道西101-107號利泰大樓業主
Mobile Phone No.:
英国的主流是不讲粤语的，想融入英国主流社会是要讲英的，真是江山易改本性难移。
香港記者去
這訪問香港人不說粵語說英文？你腦有事？
美國有好多大陸人都係唔識講英文，都淨係講普通話
@@尤茵 佢地真係on9 我係澳洲見部分大陸人都係,,
香港有一批港奸，中華膠，所以斷送了高度自治，淪落如今地步！
不是反骨仔打砸抢，逼中央，，中央不至于这么早干预
赶快去移民。
不用什麼趕快，「真」香港人（有BNO的）什麼時候也可以去的。
中国🇨🇳人葡萄了
如果當年香港都有機會公投的話，香港絕對有機會繼續屬於英國殖民地。可惜歷史係冇如果，香港最終都係被中共吞併
鳩嗡
@@woyau9189
算你有自知之明
不喜欢，也没有谁希望你留下吧
民主回歸中國 當年講出呢個口號啲人累街坊 香港保持中立 作為中國窗口 先係雙贏
蘋果又黎文宣洗腦 不過諗深一層 日日對住嘅地方都係咁細 成個國家得油尖旺咁大 悶都悶死 有架車俾你遊吓車河都冇掟去 不過諗深一層 日日對住嘅地方都係咁細 唯一好處真係放長假 叫做可以去吓西班牙同其他歐洲國家only
為了利益,好處就投靠外國,效忠外國！跟貓狗有何分別！有奶便是娘！中國是漢奸最多國家！引用何志平先生的視頻" 認賊作父"！只是個人意見！
原來西班牙咁似某強國做埋晒D野咁幼稚&智障仔的LOL
我们的师父很正派，从来不搞不正之风，从来不拉关系、走后门、攀权贵等，修炼法轮大法的人遍布社会各个阶层，上至党政军干部下至平民百姓，无论是谁请师父吃饭，师父从来不参加。师父也从来不给弟子添麻烦，无论师父遇到什么艰难的事情，比如说经济困难了……师父从来不跟弟子说，弟子们想帮师父做点事都做不成，比如说师父到什么地方去传法，想给师父买张火车票啊、飞机票啊，都买不成。也许你会想，师父办班，会有很大收入的，不缺钱。我们师父办班传法，在全国各种气功中是收费最低的，甚至引起其它功派的不满和嫉妒。
叶浩先生曾说，师父一九九二年开始传法，一年多了，经济困难到什么程度啊，出第一本《中国法轮功》和第二本《中国法轮功（修订本）》都没有钱出书，那时候出书要付钱给出版社的，到处去借钱，即使这样，师父不但没有提高办班收费，还一再减免那些困难学员的费用。师父在国内传法两年，一共举办了54期学习班，师父时时刻刻都在奔波着为众生操劳着，甚至连过年都不能和家人团聚。师父从来不告诉弟子传法中遇到的魔难、艰险，从来不要弟子一分钱，只为弟子无私的付出。
也许有人说你们师父对社会有什么贡献呀？我们师父在一九九二年、一九九三年东方健康博览会上，在全国2400多种气功中，被誉为明星功派，师父也赢得了最受欢迎的气功师称号，并且由于博览会期间，师父为广大群众祛病健身作出的无私奉献和法轮功的神奇功效，博览会组委会和专家委员会共同作出决定，大会将唯一的一个最高奖励“边缘科学進步奖”授予师父。在九三年健康博览会上，师父应邀在公安大学做了两场学术报告，收入的六万元全部捐给中华见义勇为基金会，在延边做的那场报告会收入七千元也全部献给红十字会。师父还为公安见义勇为积极分子、模范英雄人物几百人所受的刀伤、枪伤等做康复治疗，治疗效果达98%，当时公安部还专门给师父写了感谢信。
真正的平行时空的香港是柏林吧，可以把俄国类比于北方中国，DDR类比于广东。在直布罗陀英国人毕竟还是入侵者
都有公民自決，點睇。
@@cw-nh6kj 把反对者全部灭了就没有反对的了XD
HK ppl dont like ppl from mainland? dont forget your ancestors were from mainland...you forget! no eye see
my ancestors are from Hong Kong
Wrong. HK ppl don’t like the CCP
so what? Europeans had a common ancestor, they were ruled by Rome Empire, but they dont have to like each other
@@WEEW148
Too many Mainland Chinese flooded into HK resulting in a serious shortage of housing. Public Housing should have been built for the locals.
Human’s ancestors came from Africa, you're African!
希望中国政府可以支持点军火给西班牙，求吃瓜
把他养富，结果生了异心，还仇视大陆人。香港反骨仔跟澳门人差太远。
你懂條毛
關你鳥事，你是香港人?
@@leslieizq 是不是香港人又關你鳩事。
記者樣太醜!睇唔晒