ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ส.ค. 2024
- It's not that it is bad. It just not really what I want it to be, I really wanted it to be a 10.0-10.3 car with a really good 105 dart because that is really what could make it more special. So I did not play it much and this is what I could gather for gameplay.
Being serious about the Vextra tho. The mobility is good and the gun handling is excellent for a wheeled tank. It feels sorta in between a Type 16 and radkampf to how it plays mobility wise while still having gen 2 thermals as well. But it also has a weaker dart than both of those atm. Gaijin stated it is because they wanted it for the "lineup" which is just lmao cause they obviously do not care this much about keeping a vehicle in a lineup when they add stuff all the time. KF41, Namer, etc. I mean the Type 16 sits by itself at 9.7 in the Japan tree so idk. If Gaijin really wanted to add a 9.7 light tank to france they should just add the stabilized SK105 at 9.3/9.7 with a better dart.
I am a Gaijin partner and I have a discount link with Decal.
Store Link tinyurl.com/27fb92c7
Discord / discord
Twitch / cavenub (Stream is when I feel like it and is random/have time)
UserSight
live.warthunder.com/post/1032...
First Match 10-1 10 Assist YIPPEE 00:00
Second Match 11-1 06:01 - เกม
Now watch Gaijin add a stabilized SK 105 with a better dart at a higher BR.
In 5 years.
As is tradition for us French mains....
High BR autocannon IFV in a decade or two then
You mean same BR right ?
as an event reward
many report wherr made for the VEXTRA 105 it will get :
more armor,
better APFSDS,
130 km/h top speed,
a new transmission model,
same reload as other light tank for the br
Also a new br, like 10.3/10.0
9.7 just means constant 10.3 games anyhow...
9.3 also
@@CarameloWTI’m getting lucky w often 8.3 downtiers 🙏
that thing looks sussy at 9.7 without penetratable shell
The round is perfectly fine, that thing is nearly on par to what the M1 uses at 10.3.....
It's not all about the shell you know?
This thing is crazy mobile and the turret is super fast. It is much better at putting the gun on the target than stuff at the same BR.
@ricardohumildebrabo @aflyingcowboy31 good ammo let you alot of abilities to play
Yes same weakspots but otherwise you can allow yourself to shoot in them at different angles
Like difference between DM53 and DM33 on L55
In your statement I figured out that you don't need any good shells , so shoot stock
@aflyingcowboy31 Imagine 40 degrees turret traverse and armor ,5 second reload rate
@@jetacces "good ammo let you alot of abilities to play "
Yes we all know. At 9.7 it has as good of a round as the M1 does at 10.3, it also has batter round then what the US gets at 9.3 and has a better round then the 9.3 Type 16 (P).
Get over it. That round is more then fine for 9.7.
I recall this thing having the F2 dart in the dev server but the penetration values were wrong.
Well yes but GJ said : balans lmao
Team THINK decal? How!?
Man, I was really hoping that Gaijin would give us the AMX-10 RCR instead of the Vextra. This should have stayed at 8.7. and instead the upgraded AMX-10 RCR be at 9.7
how on earth is this a 8.7 vehicle....
Are you insane by chance?
You realize the 10 RCR would just be a heavier slower and worse 10RC ingame?!
You realize the Vextra is VASTLY better than any 10 RC?!!!
What kind of drugs are you on!
RCR would be slower than a classic RC with still no stab.
Ask for 10 RC TML late
Vextra with the TMK 105 Turret, a version of the regular AMX-10 Turret could have been a variant of the Vextra at 8.7. it means no stab, and AMX 10 gun with its dart and probably no thermal since it was just a testbed. It would have been a "Vextra early".
In its current state the Vextra should have the OFL F2 with 489mm of pen, a better acceleration and also a 6.7 ,reload as all 105mm. If iall of that were to be included the Vextra could even move to 10.3.
Second ÙwÚ
Imjelqfaffa
First :)
chad amethys
fix it instead commenting uwu
Kringa
erm