A... Mixed First-Impression of the Tarot of the Great Outdoors

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @Tarotismagic
    @Tarotismagic 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Niamh, I know you are aware of this now but for the ppl in the comments - I emailed the company about the cardstock problem and they told me they are reprinting the deck on a better card stock in 3 months time 🥳🥳🥳yay!

  • @TrioofWitchesTarot
    @TrioofWitchesTarot 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I laminated mine on both sides with clear contact paper. Great travel deck now. Also I heard on another channel that they got a message from the publisher that they will be republishing soon on better cardstock. Try the contact paper.

    • @aquamarine18
      @aquamarine18 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Do you mind sharing the brand and type (matte, etc.) of contact paper you used? I've never done this but want to try it with this deck.

    • @-NiamhWitch-
      @-NiamhWitch-  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, I found out the day that this went up that they are reprinting! I'm glad for that! Kind of wish I knew sooner because I would have waited to get my deck lol.

    • @TrioofWitchesTarot
      @TrioofWitchesTarot 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@aquamarine18 con-tact brand clear glossy. If you'd like more instructions I could post a how to video. It's not hard but can be a little fiddly.

  • @TarotMagpie
    @TarotMagpie 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do you have the Brian Froud Faeries or Tantric Dakini oracle? Those two are SO THIN I am almost afraid to use them. The art on this is gorgeous, such a shame the cardstock doesn't do it justice!

    • @-NiamhWitch-
      @-NiamhWitch-  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have the Brian Froud Fairies, and it is thin, however, it's also laminated (or has some kind of coating over it), so there's a bit of sturdiness to it that this deck unfortunately does not have. It's not just the thinness of this deck, it's also the texture... it really does feel like slightly thicker printer paper... and is so floppy!
      I did find out, however, that the company that makes this deck is reprinting it on better cardstock in a few months! Apparently a LOT of people complained...

    • @TarotMagpie
      @TarotMagpie 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@-NiamhWitch- Oh no, that really is bad then 😅 I'm glad they've listened and are fixing it though

  • @annazagorskaya
    @annazagorskaya 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello. Tell me, please, did the deck come to you from the seller in factory film or without film?

    • @-NiamhWitch-
      @-NiamhWitch-  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      From the seller. This was a verified purchase.

    • @annazagorskaya
      @annazagorskaya 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@-NiamhWitch- Was the deck wrapped in film?

    • @-NiamhWitch-
      @-NiamhWitch-  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@annazagorskaya I don't remember. I got this months ago. Ordered from Amazon.

    • @missjocy92
      @missjocy92 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mine was not wrapped in film. The box or the cards.

    • @annazagorskaya
      @annazagorskaya หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@missjocy92 thank you very much

  • @carolynbm
    @carolynbm 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This deck is beautiful. That’s too bad about the cardstock.

  • @patoberlein8419
    @patoberlein8419 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Card stock is a big issue to me

  • @missjocy92
    @missjocy92 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This deck for me is not RWS. I’m thinking of cutting off the card names and using it to read intuitively rather than with traditional meanings.