Northrop F-5 Freedom Fighter | The American Supersonic Light Fighter Aircraft | Upscaled Footage

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ส.ค. 2022
  • The Northrop F-5 is a family of supersonic light fighter aircraft initially designed as a privately funded project in the late 1950s by Northrop Corporation. There are two main models, the original F-5A and F-5B Freedom Fighter variants and the extensively updated F-5E and F-5F Tiger II variants. The design team wrapped a small, highly aerodynamic fighter around two compact and high-thrust General Electric J85 engines, focusing on performance and a low cost of maintenance. Smaller and simpler than contemporaries such as the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II, the F-5 cost less to procure and operate, making it a popular export aircraft. Though primarily designed for a day air superiority role, the aircraft is also a capable ground-attack platform. The F-5A entered service in the early 1960s. During the Cold War, over 800 were produced through 1972 for U.S. allies. Though at the time the United States Air Force (USAF) did not have a need for a light fighter, it did procure approximately 1,200 Northrop T-38 Talon trainer aircraft, which was based on Northrop's N-156 fighter design.
    After winning the International Fighter Aircraft Competition, a program aimed at providing effective low-cost fighters to American allies, in 1970 Northrop introduced the second-generation F-5E Tiger II in 1972. This upgrade included more powerful engines, larger fuel capacity, greater wing area and improved leading edge extensions for better turn rates, optional air-to-air refueling, and improved avionics including air-to-air radar. Primarily used by American allies, it remains in US service to support training exercises. It has served in a wide array of roles, being able to perform both air and ground attack duties; the type was used extensively in the Vietnam War.
    The F-5 was also developed into a dedicated reconnaissance aircraft, the RF-5 Tigereye. The F-5 also served as a starting point for a series of design studies which resulted in the Northrop YF-17 and the F/A-18 naval fighter aircraft.
    The design effort was led by Northrop vice president of engineering and aircraft designer Edgar Schmued who previously at North American Aviation had been the chief designer of the successful North American P-51 Mustang and F-86 Sabre fighters. Schmued recruited a strong engineering team to Northrop.
    From this tour, Schmued gave his team the goal of reversing the trend in fighter development towards greater size and weight in order to deliver an aircraft with high performance, enhanced maneuverability, and high reliability, while still delivering a cost advantage over contemporary fighters.Recognizing that expensive jet aircraft could not viably be replaced every few years, he also demanded "engineered growth potential" allowing service longevity in excess of 10 years.
    General characteristics
    Crew: 1
    Length: 48 ft 2.25 in (14.6876 m)
    Wingspan: 26 ft 8 in (8.13 m)
    27 ft 11.875 in (8.53123 m) with wing-tip missiles
    Height: 13 ft 4.5 in (4.077 m)
    Wing area: 186 sq ft (17.3 m2)
    Aspect ratio: 3.86
    Airfoil: NACA 65A004.8
    Empty weight: 9,583 lb (4,347 kg)
    Gross weight: 15,745 lb (7,142 kg) clean
    Max takeoff weight: 24,675 lb (11,192 kg)
    Fuel capacity:
    Internal fuel: 677 US gal (564 imp gal; 2,560 l)
    External fuel: up to 3x 275 US gal (229 imp gal; 1,040 l) drop-tanks
    Lift-to-drag ratio: 10.0
    Zero-lift drag coefficient: CD0.0200
    Frontal area: 3.4 sq ft (0.32 m2)
    Powerplant: 2 × General Electric J85-GE-21 afterburning turbojet engines, 3,500 lbf (16 kN) thrust each dry, 5,000 lbf (22 kN) with afterburner
    Performance
    Maximum speed: Mach 1.63 (1,741 km/h; 1,082 mph) at 36,000 ft (11,000 m)
    Maximum cruise speed: Mach 0.98 (1,050 km/h; 650 mph) at 36,000 ft (11,000 m)
    Economical cruise speed: Mach 0.8 (850 km/h; 530 mph) at 36,000 ft (11,000 m)
    Stall speed: 124 kn (143 mph, 230 km/h) 50% internal fuel, flaps and wheels extended
    Never exceed speed: 710 kn (820 mph, 1,310 km/h) IAS
    Range: 481 nmi (554 mi, 891 km) clean
    Combat radius (20 min reserve): 120 nmi (140 mi; 220 km) with 2x Sidewinders + 5,200 lb (2,400 kg) ordnance, with 5 minutes combat at max power at sea level
    Ferry range: 2,010 nmi (2,310 mi, 3,720 km)
    Ferry range (20 min reserve): 1,385 nmi (1,594 mi; 2,565 km) drop tanks retained
    Ferry range (20 min reserve): 1,590 nmi (1,830 mi; 2,940 km) drop tanks jettisoned
    Service ceiling: 51,800 ft (15,800 m)
    Service ceiling one engine out: 41,000 ft (12,000 m)
    Rate of climb: 34,500 ft/min (175 m/s)
    Lift-to-drag: 10:1
    Wing loading: 133 lb/sq ft (650 kg/m2) maximum
    Thrust/weight: 0.4 take-off thrust at maximum take-off weight
    Take-off run: 2,000 ft (610 m) with two Sidewinders at 15,745 lb (7,142 kg)
    Take-off run to 50 ft (15 m): 2,900 ft (884 m) with two Sidewinders at 15,745 lb (7,142 kg)
    Landing run from 50 ft (15 m): 3,701 ft (1,128 m) without brake-chute
    Landing run from 50 ft (15 m): 2,500 ft (762 m) with brake-chute
    #f5 #F5freedomfighter #supersonic
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 108

  • @Dronescapes
    @Dronescapes  ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Click the link to watch more aircraft, heroes and their stories, missions: th-cam.com/play/PLBI4gRjPKfnNx3Mp4xzYTtVARDWEr6nrT.html

  • @JCMills55
    @JCMills55 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I was a crew chief in the USAF on F-5E's in the late 70's. Amazing jet's all around. Our pilots loved flying them and our crew chiefs loved working on them. I was a crew chief on T-38's prior so had a good head start. It was some of the best times of my life.

    • @Dronescapes
      @Dronescapes  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for sharing

    • @sigmamale7241
      @sigmamale7241 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice to see an aircraft designed for the "maintenance" person...The A-4 sure as hell wasn't, IMO!

  • @HappyHands.
    @HappyHands. ปีที่แล้ว +4

    20min engine change is absolutely amazing

  • @jbrunieri1
    @jbrunieri1 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The first two series F 5E aircraft still fly today, they are operated by the Brazilian Air Force, the aircraft registration 11417 in the USAF, flies in the FAB with registration 4856 and the 1418 flies with the numeral 4857, both were modernized for the EM standard.

    • @yonniboy1
      @yonniboy1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Taiwan also still fly the F5E.

  • @oliverbeardsall2819
    @oliverbeardsall2819 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    watch out mav, we got a mig on our tail

    • @mahasir
      @mahasir ปีที่แล้ว +1

      keeping up foreign relation

  • @brentfellers9632
    @brentfellers9632 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    As an air cadets in CFB Penhold Alta. Canada, the graduates of the NCO program in the 70's, were treated to a LOW high speed pass by a cf5 and a cf104. Just thinking back I get GOOSEBUMPS!
    the pair of them sounded like "tie fighters" from Star Wars as they passed overhead. Then the roar / boom! Fucking ORGASMIC!!!

  • @jtjames79
    @jtjames79 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sweet one of my favorites!

  • @13stalag13
    @13stalag13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    8:02 talking about the Grumman Hellcat, shows film of Republic P-47 Thunderbolt.

    • @13stalag13
      @13stalag13 ปีที่แล้ว

      8:02, not 8:10

  • @alexandrec9372
    @alexandrec9372 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Aqui no Brasil o F5 foi adquirido no início dos anos de 1970, foram modernizados pela Embraer por volta de 2001 e a espectativa é continuar em serviço até 2025... Eu desconfio que ficarão por mais tempo ainda, um caça muito versátil e que seu design envelheceu muito bem e ainda parece um avião bastante moderno.
    Mais um excelente vídeo... 👏👏👏

  • @tonamg53
    @tonamg53 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This plane doesn’t need kerosene, it can fly on sheer freedom.

  • @MrFlintlock7
    @MrFlintlock7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This might be the best video I ever saw on the F-5!

  • @xuchun5371
    @xuchun5371 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    OMG ! a 1960's plane still can see all the time fly over our head from nearby AFB , then moment later , a F-18 will take off and chase it. sure they both having fun up there !

  • @cmscms123456
    @cmscms123456 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    F-5 cost per flight hour is very very low compared to all others in US inventory. Also, the Air Force has learned, that putting too many hours on the F-22 will lead to its early retirement, but the pilots still need to keep their hours up, in a high performance jet. The Air Force and US Navy has been interested in 'buying back' F-5's from foreign nations.
    I think some versions of the F-5 will be around to see the retirement of the F-15, F-16 and F-18... Cheap to keep.

    • @everydaydose7779
      @everydaydose7779 ปีที่แล้ว

      They should be revived ngl
      They can be used as trainer crafts for high G simulations till this day and can be exported even to this day for agressor/trainers for other countries

    • @cmscms123456
      @cmscms123456 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@everydaydose7779 A lot of countries leaders haven't come to realize, these jets are great low cost per hour to operate, and allow their fighter pilots to keep their hours up... I see Norway just sold off ALL of their F-16's having only F-35's now... good luck with the cost of keeping those nightmares flying, and their pilots hours up where they should be

    • @killingfields1424
      @killingfields1424 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Pentagons Joint Chiefs of Fighter Mafia has been draining continuesly the Federal Reserve of their ultra hard earned tax payers blood dollars by continuesly making new technologies that doesnt make any sense at all. Like their fat jet that they push to do ballet, forcing, bribing rich allies to buy those precious 5th generation garbage. They are still even until now clinging begging for mercy for those precious garbage as this old Vietnam relic continues to annihilate their masterpieces the F-35 and F-22 by those little Tigers, the F-5E in every field of operations. One more thing, the F-5 ultra smallish proportios is still the hardest to see on radars or sensors even without stealth technology. Just fly them at near deck level and you got a real invisible, silent death coming to its target even the F-16 cannot do

  • @dustyphillips3166
    @dustyphillips3166 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great content. You really need to work on the volume balance between the music and the narration.

  • @devinhuhta7629
    @devinhuhta7629 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video I love aviation videos

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent stuff bro

  • @mobylure
    @mobylure ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One of the most beautiful design in fighter plane. Love'em

  • @risingpower3658
    @risingpower3658 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I saw a standard air show display with an F-5. With this one, you need a starter to get them started.
    The plane did the same routine as any F-15, or F18.
    As I understand it the focus changed to a multirole fighter. That means it needs to be bigger to carry more bombs. That's like F-15, F-16, and our F-18.
    The form is not dead on this fighter plane.
    Iran's homegrown fighter is basically a homebuilt F5. They have evolved the plane up to the 'Tigershark' level.

  • @larrywarner4305
    @larrywarner4305 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This plane could probably hold its own even today.

  • @briantodd2376
    @briantodd2376 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great footage of a great aircraft. Need to work on the audio. 👍

  • @sadwingsraging3044
    @sadwingsraging3044 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Something you can point to as proof to the old saw _If it looks right it_ *is* _right._
    Best looking plane ever. It just looks _right._

  • @rickcarter4417
    @rickcarter4417 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aggressor aircraft are always painted so cool

  • @SliceofLife7777
    @SliceofLife7777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool

  • @ezequielpiacenza3776
    @ezequielpiacenza3776 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rapidísimo 👍👍👍y ágil

  • @gii_vannile
    @gii_vannile ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Northrop F-5 Freedom Fighter
    Thank you very much .
    Dec. 31st 2022 Wed. 08:00 am
    from Yokohama City Japan

    • @b1lleman
      @b1lleman ปีที่แล้ว +2

      a message from the future ! 🙂

  • @frankmccann29
    @frankmccann29 ปีที่แล้ว

    Col Bortman, God bless wherever you are. This aircraft is dangerous with upgraded ecm/fire control and I hope we never have to prove it. Incredible coverage of all aspects of aircraft. Regards.

  • @manuelchaguaceda585
    @manuelchaguaceda585 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bedankt

  • @HappyHands.
    @HappyHands. ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i always get this plane mixed up with the t-38

  • @michaelhusada2276
    @michaelhusada2276 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was a young teen in Indonesia when the country was looking to modernise their Air Force in the 1980s. They were flying F-5s, A-4s, and OV-10s. The F-20 was considered but they decided to go with F-16.
    I had a strong opinion that Indonesia should’ve gone with the Tigershark as it was significantly cheaper and easier to operate than the Falcon. Especially when they already flew the F-5s. They probably could’ve bought more for what they spent on the General Dynamic plane.

    • @Dronescapes
      @Dronescapes  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for sharing your insight Michael

  • @markmcghee984
    @markmcghee984 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was a crew chief on the F-5 in the 64 aggressor sq. Easy plane to work

  • @johngeverett
    @johngeverett ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting video.
    Very poor balance between the narrator volume (somewhat low) and the music (too loud)

  • @andrewlabat9963
    @andrewlabat9963 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My uncle flew one for his tours in Vietnam.. He said it could take some hits and brought him home..

  • @29madmangaud29
    @29madmangaud29 ปีที่แล้ว

    another "SNIPER" at 22:30,,,, love it!

  • @bradpittman5075
    @bradpittman5075 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Forever cool.

  • @oxcart4172
    @oxcart4172 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That Hellcat looks an awful lot like a Thunderbolt!

    • @mariodelgado9729
      @mariodelgado9729 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes indeed, @ 8:01, that is a Razorback P-47 and not a F6F Hellcat!!

  • @nate61
    @nate61 ปีที่แล้ว

    Extremely beautiful fast very moveable the perfect trainer

  • @44excalibur
    @44excalibur ปีที่แล้ว

    The F-5 Tiger was the predecessor of the YF-17 Cobra, which was the prototype for the F-18 Hornet.

  • @cordellej
    @cordellej ปีที่แล้ว

    nice P-47 thunderbolt there bub

  • @kevinmiller4486
    @kevinmiller4486 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video and information, but the music gets too loud. I don’t listen to documentaries to get blasted by music.

  • @29madmangaud29
    @29madmangaud29 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alright, @ 15:50 you've got a beautiful shot of "OUR" VMFT-401 Sniper aircraft "03) 761541, looks like in Miramar, Ca

  • @michaelhowell2541
    @michaelhowell2541 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oldie but a goodie!👍😂👁️👁️🇺🇸

  • @robertoferrari5397
    @robertoferrari5397 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ...i want one.

  • @kellymartin8090
    @kellymartin8090 ปีที่แล้ว

    The music between vocal narration is way too loud. Otherwise, good video!

  • @scottfuller1711
    @scottfuller1711 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The F-5 was never designed to be used by the US, it was designed to be a cheap plane to be given to our allies that couldn't afford an air program of their own.

    • @willsta21
      @willsta21 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tell that to NASA…

  • @ReviveHF
    @ReviveHF ปีที่แล้ว

    In the present day, the F16, F/A18, JF17 and F-CK 1 are the legacies of the F5.

  • @TD402dd
    @TD402dd 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the Vietnam war, the South flew them against Russian MiGs, and were able shoot them down. Later it received the name Razor for its sharp handling and difficulty in being seen.

  • @afpwarmodernizationarchive1320
    @afpwarmodernizationarchive1320 ปีที่แล้ว

    f-5 was direct rival of MiG-21 both are great small highly nimble fighters

  • @gort8203
    @gort8203 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The F-5 is great plane in many ways, but this video overstates its capabilities and draws shallow and inaccurate conclusions with regard to its air combat results against front line fighters. The F-5 was able to beat these fighters because it was flown by expert instructors under rules of engagement that suited its use as a training aid.

    • @xuchun5371
      @xuchun5371 ปีที่แล้ว

      this 1960's plane still can see all the time fly over our head from nearby AFB , then moment later , a F-18 will take off and chase it. the only different to me is F- 5 fly louder

    • @everydaydose7779
      @everydaydose7779 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If they continued variants of this plane
      They can still be easily the top tier light attack/trainer planes and if not the cheapest per unit but also per hour

    • @gort8203
      @gort8203 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@everydaydose7779 The F-5 was a great design I'd love to see fly forever, but it does not have the performance to be a ""top tier" trainer in today's world. Most airplanes can be pressed into the "light attack" role, but there are more suitable and less expensive alternatives than the F-5.

    • @kdrapertrucker
      @kdrapertrucker ปีที่แล้ว

      @@everydaydose7779 not really, they had pretty much stretched the Airframe to it's limits with the F-5F. The F-20 was a completely new design. And it gets more expensive to operate the older it gets. Newer aircraft are less expensive to maintain because they designed in modularity and self test capability. You have an electrical fault a modern aircraft, the self test localizes it to a certain box, the crew chief quickly disconnects and removes the box, replaces it, and the aircraft is set to go.

  • @jayrod9979
    @jayrod9979 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The US Navy still has an F-5 squadron based out of Key West(Boca Chica) that are used as aggressor fighters for training.

    • @Dronescapes
      @Dronescapes  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Very interesting Jay.

    • @jayrod9979
      @jayrod9979 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Dronescapes
      The Sundowners based out of Key West are exclusively F-5s...theres another "aggressor" squad out of Nevada that also still flies the F-5

  • @donalddouglas5661
    @donalddouglas5661 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The closest thing to reimagining the F-5 in today's fighter force is the F-16. The F-5 was perhaps the sleekest, most maneuverable and easiest fighter to maintain to date. Putting the keenest minds in aviation development to work toward revisiting/reimagining this design could yield fascinating and useful characteristics even in today's world.

    • @xuchun5371
      @xuchun5371 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      take notice , it was designed in later 50 's , that is amazing

    • @curtisbryce5096
      @curtisbryce5096 ปีที่แล้ว

      Have you forgotten the F20?

    • @briananthony4044
      @briananthony4044 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think the modern interpretation of the F-5 would be the Gripen, compact, simple to operate and maintain, can use roads or fields, cheaper to buy, etc.

    • @curtisbryce5096
      @curtisbryce5096 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@briananthony4044 Nah.

    • @marsmotion
      @marsmotion 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      quite. good observation. saying otherwise is very silly @@briananthony4044

  • @alanrogers7090
    @alanrogers7090 ปีที่แล้ว

    The narrator spoke about the Grumman F6F Hellcat Navy fighter, but showed a Republic P-46 Thunderbolt instead, TWICE!

  • @phoenixrising4073
    @phoenixrising4073 ปีที่แล้ว

    The F16 is usually what I consider my favorite fighter of all time, but the F20 might just top it. I really wish it would have been produced.

  • @azls73
    @azls73 ปีที่แล้ว

    i saw it flew just above my car a bit bigger to car roof top back in Singapore many years ago !!!

  • @penskepc2374
    @penskepc2374 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    U wonder if you could upgrade it to be a decent mosern air to air fighter

  • @mahasir
    @mahasir ปีที่แล้ว

    wow those days have lady marshaller

  • @kdrapertrucker
    @kdrapertrucker ปีที่แล้ว

    Hopefully Boeing/SAAB develop a fighter version of the T-7A as a 21st century version of the F-5.

  • @dave8599
    @dave8599 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:04 No, that is not a Hellcat, that is a P 47.

  • @mahasir
    @mahasir ปีที่แล้ว

    i think those enemy 'migs' lines in the script of top gun 1986 movie should be replaced with proper enemy 'F5' lines. no harm

  • @andrewnegron288
    @andrewnegron288 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this Jet , a very underated fighter , what if they'd paid attention to the F-20? ,who knows where it would have been around in today's world of jet combat around 4+ gen?.

    • @Dronescapes
      @Dronescapes  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😎

    • @bodasactra
      @bodasactra ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its a nice export fighter for our former colonial friends, with low military budgets, to get them off the prop. Beautiful and effective at its task in Normalville but we don't want to move it to Crazytown in our enthusiasm.

  • @ytn00b3
    @ytn00b3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    F-5 Tiger II still fly in Korea

    • @JR-dd8bf
      @JR-dd8bf ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In Brazil too

  • @aint_no_saint8782
    @aint_no_saint8782 ปีที่แล้ว

    Talks about Grumman Hellcat (Not the Northrop Black widow) shows video of a REPUBLIC THUNDERBOLT.....

    • @gort8203
      @gort8203 ปีที่แล้ว

      And doesn't actually link any of that to the F-5 in any meaningful way. These front line prop fighters have little in common with the genesis of the F-5.

  • @29madmangaud29
    @29madmangaud29 ปีที่แล้ว

    again @ 23:30

  • @ryanchung2028
    @ryanchung2028 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A bad little airplane especially the F 20. And no you know where the griffin gets its inspiration from

  • @killingfields1424
    @killingfields1424 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hated the most by the Airforce, John Voight and Pentagon's Fighter Mafia. Any attemp to make it better will be sabotage in any way they can

  • @1winlock
    @1winlock ปีที่แล้ว

    WTF Grumman?

  • @bodasactra
    @bodasactra ปีที่แล้ว

    Great for its purpose to rearm poor allied countries, emerging from pre WWII colonialism, still using prop planes for self defense. The overenthusiastic expectations of some that it could be a competitor with modern 4th gen, first line, American fighters that causes argument over this plane. The U.S. uses big fighters for many sound reasons, that is why this plane is outclassed.

  • @anthonyrone393
    @anthonyrone393 ปีที่แล้ว

    T38 on steroids...