Erratas are amazing for digital card games ONLY. For physical card games they need to just ban cards since it makes games incredibly hard to follow if your cards dont do what is literally printed on the card. Also as a player who owns the card an errata is usually just as bad as a ban in most circumstances. Bans in card games keep the game healthy and alive does it stink when an expensive card is banned yes but it makes the play experience better. Bans are a tcg players friend.
If you don’t follow the Lorcana news then you probably don’t play competitive, which means the errata probably doesn’t matter if you just play with friends
@@EmbracedDestiny thats 100% not true. I can show up to my local shop to play and not follow news or updates. I just do what the cards say. Erratas are awful for the health of a game, and one as young as lorcana, I setting a bad precedent
@@GameBrigade wouldn’t that be the same as it being banned though? Like the card is unhealthy and toxic, but if someone is not paying attention to the rules of tourneys they would go to their locals with their banned cards just like they would with their errata’s
The reason i figure they did this is to keep people from bitching about banning more cards. No one is screaming they need to errata hiram, a whole new world, or be prepared.
@@6thface Yeah especially for casual players it was nearly impossible to get rid of an readied character with ward. I think Ravensburger was looking out for that audience!
I dont have a problem with bucky, tho both my decks do well against green/steel. that said banning needs to be the plan ahead, i dont want to play in a format where people are playing with multiple cards that all do different things than what they read interacting with one another, and this is the perspective of a player who has had almost every mtg card memorized. i just dont think this style of errata is at all friendly for casual players.
Absolutely agreed with everything you said. It sucks because the errata was meant to be catering to casual players since competitive players already have tech to counter Bucky, but many casual players also don’t follow Lorcana news so they will only get confused by an errata.
I just love that all this controversy is around Bucky the freaking squirrel from the Emperors New Groove. 😂
🤣🤣🤣 he’s just as cunning in the game as he in the movie
Erratas are amazing for digital card games ONLY. For physical card games they need to just ban cards since it makes games incredibly hard to follow if your cards dont do what is literally printed on the card. Also as a player who owns the card an errata is usually just as bad as a ban in most circumstances. Bans in card games keep the game healthy and alive does it stink when an expensive card is banned yes but it makes the play experience better. Bans are a tcg players friend.
That works too, I’ve been waiting to see the first banned/limited/semi-limited list
Erratas in a physical card game shouldn't be legal. Ravensburger need a system to where ppl can send in their original Bucky cards for a new copy.
Hahaha yea it doesn’t make sense especially for people who don’t follow Lorcana news because they’ll never find out.
If you don’t follow the Lorcana news then you probably don’t play competitive, which means the errata probably doesn’t matter if you just play with friends
@@EmbracedDestiny thats 100% not true. I can show up to my local shop to play and not follow news or updates. I just do what the cards say. Erratas are awful for the health of a game, and one as young as lorcana, I setting a bad precedent
@@GameBrigade wouldn’t that be the same as it being banned though? Like the card is unhealthy and toxic, but if someone is not paying attention to the rules of tourneys they would go to their locals with their banned cards just like they would with their errata’s
@@EmbracedDestiny I'm ok with banning because it's easier to not play a card over remembering the changes that are not on the printed card
Love your breakdown of the changes, but poor Bucky 😢
Hey Novels! Yea i wish they left him alone :(
The reason i figure they did this is to keep people from bitching about banning more cards. No one is screaming they need to errata hiram, a whole new world, or be prepared.
I can see that. This was executed poorly either way but I’m hopeful for the future 🤞🏻
@@webwarriorfanatic they need not have hit bucky so hard with the nerf bat, but even though I play ES Bucky I thought it was to powerful.
@@6thface Yeah especially for casual players it was nearly impossible to get rid of an readied character with ward. I think Ravensburger was looking out for that audience!
Seems like they should have just banned it.
Yea it’s going to be confusing now. But i believe in their intentions lol
@@webwarriorfanatic I don't think people will be apt to play it competitively any longer.
@@chrissalmasi3407 i hope not man
@@webwarriorfanatic"The road to hell is paved would good intentions."
@@6thface lol yea that’s not good… I’m hoping this isn’t one of those times
They should have just banned the card. They took the card from great to completely useless. Errata on a physical card game is so dumb
Yea it’s rough owning the card and knowing the printed text means nothing 😔
I dont have a problem with bucky, tho both my decks do well against green/steel. that said banning needs to be the plan ahead, i dont want to play in a format where people are playing with multiple cards that all do different things than what they read interacting with one another, and this is the perspective of a player who has had almost every mtg card memorized. i just dont think this style of errata is at all friendly for casual players.
Absolutely agreed with everything you said. It sucks because the errata was meant to be catering to casual players since competitive players already have tech to counter Bucky, but many casual players also don’t follow Lorcana news so they will only get confused by an errata.
should have just removed ward
That would have been more than enough to make Bucky fair